Content uploaded by Soheil Solhjoo
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Soheil Solhjoo on Feb 26, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of ISSI, Vol.4 (2007), No. 1,2, pp. 24-27
Characteristic Points of Stress-Strain Curve at High Temperature
R. Ebrahimi1* and S. Solhjoo2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Iran
Abstract
Determination of critical points on hot stress-strain curve of metals is crucial in thermo-mechanical
processes design. In this investigation a mathematical modeling is given to illustrate the behavior of metal during
hot deformation processes such as hot rolling. The critical strain for the onset of dynamic recrystallization has
been obtained as a function of strain at the maximum stress. In addition, the transition strain from static
recrystallization to full metadynamic recrystallization has been presented to form an equation as a function of
peak strain, peak stress and steady-state stress. The results of this mathematical modeling are in a good
agreement with the experimental data.
Keywords: Dynamic Recrystallization, Metadynamic Recrystallization, Transition Strain, Critical Strain.
Introduction
Evaluation of forces and forming energy is the
most important aspect of mechanical design in metal
forming processes 1,2). This requires a knowledge of
the flow stress of metals. Predicting and controlling
the microstructure during hot deformation in
industrial processes such as hot rolling is of great
importance. Microstructure evolution and
deformation mechanisms during deformation are
closely related to flow stress 3-7). Determination of
mechanisms and microstructural evolution by
methods such as optical microscopy, scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) is possible but expensive
and time consuming. Many researchers have tried to
predict microstructural evolution from stress-strain
curves; thus, by proper designing of thermo-
mechanical processes, the suitable microstructure is
formed.
Flow stress is a function of dislocation density
(
ρ
) 8), and dislocation density at high temperature
is a function of some parameters such as primary
microstructure, temperature and strain rate.
Therefore, for a given microstructure, temperature
and strain rate condition, the change of stress versus
strain is closely related to metal microstructural
evolution. Appearance of the maximum stress on the
stress-strain curve and its slow decrement to the
steady-state stress are the characteristics of dynamic
recrystallization (DRX). This phenomenon usually
occurs in the metals with low to medium stacking
fault energy (SFE) such as Iron, Copper, Austenitic
Stainless Steel, etc.
*Corresponding author:
Tel: +98-711-6286531 Fax: +98-711-6287294
E-mail: ebrahimy@shirazu.ac.ir
Address: Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering,
School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Iran
Work hardening and dynamic recovery (DRV)
mechanisms control the flow stress up to the
maximum stress. DRX occurs before the maximum
stress, but since the latter is easier to determine, it is
practically used in the design of thermo-mechanical
processes even though many researches have tried to
locate the exact point of the on set of DRX on the
stress-strain curve, i.e. the critical strain 9-12).
After the peak of stress-strain curve is reached,
the rate of softening increases to a maximum value at
a particular strain. This particular strain is called
"transition strain to full metadynamic
recrystallization" 13,14). Determining this transition
strain is very important in industrial processes such
as hot rolling. This means that the process must be
designed in such a way to allow the nucleation of
new grains during deformation. Afterwards, full
metadynamic recrystallization happens in the time
between rolling stands. Therefore, critical points are
essential in the design of thermo-mechanincal
processes. The purpose of this paper is to present a
mathematical model which shows the metal
behaviour during hot deformation. This model can
exactly determine the critical strain, εC, for the onset
of DRX and the transition strain, εT, for static-
metadynamic recrystallization transition into full
metadynamic recrystallization after deformation.
Mathematical analysis of flow stress
Flow curves of metals having low to medium
SFE show clear DRX behavior. Thus, these curves
always have only one peak. McQueen et al. have
modeled the stress-strain curve up to the peak by 9,15):
)1(1exp
C
PPP
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢
⎣
⎡
⎟
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛−
⎟
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛
=
ε
ε
ε
ε
σ
σ
1. Assistant Professor
2. B. S. Student
International Journal of ISSI, Vol.4 (2007), No. 1,2
25
where C is a constant and must be determined for
each metal and σP and εP are the maximum stress and
strain at the maximum stress, respectively.
Figure 1 is a schematic hot flow curve when
DRX occurs. This curve indicates two zones. In zone
I, work hardening prevails DRV, so the flow stress
increases up to a maximum value. In zone II, DRV
and DRX occur simultaneously, thus flow stress
gradually decreases and at large strains reaches a
steady-state value. The derivative of flow stress is
positive in zone I and negative in zone II, and
approaches zero in the steady-state zone. Equation 2
demonstrates the stress-strain relationship after the
maximum stress as a complement for McQueen
equation 16):
()
)2(
22
exp
2
1⎥
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢
⎢
⎣
⎡
⎟
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛−−−+=
P
P
SPS C
ε
εε
εσσσσ
where σP is the maximum stress, εP is the strain at the
maximum stress and σS is the steady-state stress. In
order to determine the constant, C1, a point, K is
chosen on the curve such that K<1 and σK>σS. Then
C1 is given by equation 3:
()
)3(ln
12
2
2
1⎟
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛
−
−
+−
=
SK
SP
P
KK
C
σσ
σσ
ε
where σK is calculated by Eq. 1 at εK = KεP.
The equations represented by this model require
the values of stress and strain at the peak and stress at
the steady-state zone. These parameters can be
calculated by kinetic equations 16).
Fig. 1. Schematic flow curve at high temperature for
DRX.
Critical strain for the onset of DRX
During the deformation, an increase in the work
hardening increases the dislocation density leading to
a critical microstructural condition at which new
grains nucleate and new high-angle boundaries grow.
This phenomenon is called dynamic recrystallization,
DRX. Gradually, the dislocation density increases in
other areas as well. Therefore, the flow stress
increases up to a maximum value and the rate of
softening mechanism prevails work hardening
afterwards. Thus, flow stress reaches a steady-state
condition at which the rate of generation and
annihilation of dislocations become equal each other.
The critical strain at the onset of DRX can be
determined metallorgraphically from the observation
of microstructure of quenched specimens. This
technique requires a large number of specimens
deformed to different strains. On the other hand, the
critical strain thus obtained is not precise 11). Ryan
and McQueen observed an inflection in the
ε
σ
θ
∂
∂
=
vs. σ curve 15). Then Poliak and Jonas showed that
this inflection corresponds to the initiation of DRX
and occurs at εC=0.55εP for Nb-microalloyed steels
11). This is when the critical strain of the onset of
DRX, formerly reported by microscopic observation,
was εC=0.8εP 12).
In this research, applying Ryan and McQueen
theory and mathematical calculations, an equation is
introduced to calculate the critical strain at the onset
of DRX. The derivative of equation 1 gives:
)4(
11 ⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢
⎣
⎡−=
P
C
d
d
εε
σ
ε
σ
Fig. 2. Derivative of stress with respect to strain vs.
stress.
Fig. 2 is obtained from Eq. 4 by assuming
εP=0.85 and C=0.2 just as a sample data to show the
form of Eq. 4. The schematic shape of this curve is
exactly like the ones reported in the references, with
only one inflection 11). As Figure 3 and Figure 4
show, the second derivative of
ε
σ
θ
∂
∂
= with
respect to σ must be zero, in order to determine the
critical point.
)5(0
2
2
=
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
∂
∂
σ
ε
σ
d
d
by solving Eq. 5 we get the critical strain for the
onset of DRX as a function of strain at the maximum
stress:
)6(
11
1PC C
C
εε
⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢
⎣
⎡−−
−=
0
40
80
120
160
012345
Strain
Stress (MPa)
WH
DRV
WH-DRV-DRX
Steady State
DRX
region (I)
region (II)
International Journal of ISSI, Vol.4 (2007), No. 1,2
26
where C is the constant of equation 1 and varies
between 0.1 to 0.3 for different alloys 15). Therefore,
the critical strain values vary between 0.46εP to
0.49εP for different alloys which is in a good
agreement with values (εC=0.55εP) reported by other
researches for Nb-microalloyed steel 11). As a result,
if the flow stress equation for different alloys is
available, the exact amount of the critical strain for
the onset of DRX could be calculated by Eq. 6.
Fig.3. Derivative of work hardening rate with respect
to stress vs. stress.
Fig. 4. Second derivative of work hardening rate with
respect to stress vs. stress.
Transition strain to full metadynamic
recrystallization
As Figure 5 shows 13), whenever strain during hot
deformation reaches a critical value and then
deformation stops, the static recrystallization
phenomenon that occurs after deformation is called
metadynamic recrystallization. This is because
nucleation happens during deformation. After the
peak, the rate of softening increases continuously and
gets to its maximum value at a particular strain. If
deformation continues up to this specified strain and
then stops, full metadynamic recrystallization occurs.
This is due to the achievement of the maximum rate
of softening which guaranties that nucleus has
formed throughout the specimen. Thus, this certain
strain is called transition strain to full metadynamic
recrystallization state. The value of this strain is
reported 1.5εP for Nb-microalloyed steel 13,14).
Therefore, to estimate this transition strain, the
maximum value of softening i.e. maximum slope of
stress-strain curve at the zone with negative slope
and softening mechanism must be determined. So the
first derivative of
ε
σ
θ
∂
∂
= with respect to σ must be
zero.
)7(0=
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎝
⎛
σ
ε
σ
d
d
d
d
Fig. 5. Effects of strain on softening mechanisms
during and after deformation:
Zone I-SRX, Zone II-SRX and MDRX, Zone III-
Dynamic and MDRX [13].
by solving Eq. 7 we get the transition strain to
full metadynamic recrystallization as a function of
strain at the maximum stress:
)8(
1
C
P
PT
ε
εε
+=
where C1 is the constant of Eq. 2 that is
determined by Eq. 3. Now, in order to check Eq. 8,
we determine the transition strain for Figure 5 i.e.
for a Nb-microalloyed steel 13). From this curve we
found the approximate values of σS, σP and εP to be
113 MPa, 130 MPa and 0.85, respectively. Also by
assuming K=0.7, the approximate values of σK and εK
are 125 MPa and 0.6, respectively. Inserting these
values into Eq. 3, C1 is found to be 7.013. Eq. 8 gives
the transition strain of 1.2. Thus the ratio of the
transition strain to strain at the maximum stress
equals 1.41 ⎟
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛=41.1
P
T
ε
ε
which is comparable to the
approximate value of 1.5 ⎟
⎟
⎠
⎞
⎜
⎜
⎝
⎛≈5.1
P
T
ε
ε
reported by
other researches for Nb-microalloyed steel 13,14).
Conclusions
A mathematical model was presented to directly
determine the critical strain for onset of DRX and the
transition strain from static-metadynamic
recrystallization to full metadynamic recrystallization
International Journal of ISSI, Vol.4 (2007), No. 1,2
27
after deformation. Numerical results of these
equations are:
1-Critical strain, εC, for onset of DRX by Eq. 6
was found to be 0.46εP to 0.49εP which is in a good
agreement with 0.55εP, reported by other researches
for Nb-microalloyed steel.
2-Transition strain, εT, from static-metadynamic
recrystallization to full metadynamic recrystallization
after deformation is given by Eq. 8 which was
1.41εP for Nb-microalloyed steel that is comparable
to 1.5εP, reported by other investigators.
References
[1] T. Altan, F. W. Boulger, ASME Journal of
Engineering for Industry, 95(1973), 1009.
[2] R. Kishore, T. K. Sinha, Metall. and Mater.
Trans. A, 27(1996), 3340.
[3] S. Serajzadeh and A. Karimi Taheri, Mater.
Design, 23(2002), 271.
[4] S. I. Kim, Y. Lee, D. L. Lee, Y. C. Yoo, Mater.
Sci. Eng. A. 355(2003), 384.
[5] J. M. Cabrera, J. Ponce, J. M. Prado, J. Mater.
Process. Technol. 143-144 (2003), 403.
[6] S. H. Zahiri, C. H. J. Davies, P. D. Hodgson,
Scripta Mater., 52(2005), 299.
[7] M. Zhou, M. P. Clode, Mech. Mater. 27(1998),
63.
[8] G. E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-
Hill, New York, 1987.
[9] A. Cingara, H. J. McQueen, J. Mater. Process.
Technol. 36(1992), 31.
[10] A. Laasraoui, J. J. Jonas, Matall. Trans. A,
22(1991), 1545.
[11] E. I. Poliak, J. J. Jonas, ISIJ Int. 43(2003),
684.
[12] W. P. Sun, E.B. Hawbolt, ISIJ Int. 37(1997),
1000.
[13] P. Uranga, A. I. Fernandez, B. Lopez, J. M.
Rodriguez-Ibabe, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 345(2003),
319.
[14] A. M. Elwazri, E. Essadiqi, S. Yue, ISIJ Int.
44(2004), 744.
[15] N. D. Ryan, McQueen, Flow Stress, J. Mater.
Process. Technol. 21(1990), 177.
[16] R. Ebrahimi, S. H. Zahiri, A. Najafizadeh, J.
Mater. Process. Technol. 171(2006), 301.