Content uploaded by Joël Fleurence
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Joël Fleurence on Jan 31, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Applied Biotechnology, Food Science and Policy 2003:1(1) xx–xx
© 2003 Open Mind Journals Limited. All rights reserved. 1
SHORT COMMUNICATION
AUTHOR
PROOF
COPY
ONLY
Introduction
Phycobiliproteins are the major photosynthetic pigments
found in rhodophyta (red algae), cyanobacteria (blue-green
algae) and in a class of flagellate unicellular eukaryotic algae
(cryptomonads) (Roman et al 2002). They are involved in
the light-harvesting (in the visible region from 450 nm to
650 nm) complementing other pigments such as
chlorophylls or carotenoïds. Phycobiliproteins compose
supramolecular aggregates called phycobilisomes, which
are located near photosystem II, one of two pigment
complexes involved in the photosynthesis mechanism. This
spatial arrangement allows a transfer of light energy to
chlorophyll for photosynthesis with greater than 90%
efficiency (Redlinger and Gantt 1982; Glazer 1984; Gantt
1990; Talarico 1996).
Phycobiliproteins were classified into three families
according to their absorption properties: phycoerythrins
(λ max = 565 nm), PE (red); phycocyanins (λ max =
620 nm), PC (blue); allophycocyanins (λ max = 650 nm),
AP (blue-green) (Rüdiger 1994). According to the original
source of phycobiliproteins a further differentiation was
adopted: C for cyanobacteria, R for rhodophyta and B for
bangiales (a particular family of red algae).
R-phycoerythrin (RPE) is a phycobiliprotein found in
most red algae. For example, it is present in Palmaria
palmata, which possesses a high protein level (up to 35%
of dry weight) (Morgan et al 1980; Fleurence 1999a).This
seaweed, widely known as dulse, is used in Europe as a sea
vegetable and as an ingredient in the food industry
(Indergaard and Minsas 1991). The pigment is composed
of open chain tetrapyrrolic (bilin) covalently linked to the
apoprotein (Figure 1). RPE is a protein with a relative mass
of 240
000. It comprises two major subunits (α, β) with Mr
of 20
000 and 21
000 respectively, and a minor subunit of
Mr 30
000 (γ) (Hilditch et al 1991; Galland Irmouli et al
2000). The molecular weight of the non denatured protein
structure suggests a (αβ)6γ polypeptide structure.
However, some structure variations were also described.
For instance, RPE contained in the red alga Gracilaria longa
possesses an apparent molecular weight of about 260
000
and is characterised by the presence of 4 subunits α, β, γ, γ’
with molecular weights of 19
000, 21
5000, 30
000 and
33
000 respectively (D’Agnolo et al 1994).
Because of its spectral properties, phycoerythrin is
widely used in biochemical techniques and clinical
Correspondence: Joël Fleurence, Laboratoire de Biologie Marine,
UPRES EA 2663, ISOMER, UFR Sciences et Techniques, 2 Rue de la
Houssinière, BP 92 208 44 322, Nantes cedex 3, France; tel
+33
251
125
660; fax +33 251 125 668; email Joel.Fleurence@isomer.univ-nantes.fr
R-phycoerythrin from red macroalgae:
strategies for extraction and potential
application in biotechnology
Joël Fleurence
Laboratoire de Biologie Marine, UFR Sciences et Techniques, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
Abstract: R-phycoerythrin (RPE) is a red fluorescent pigment belonging to the phycobiliprotein family. It is a protein with an apparent
molecular weight of Mr 240
000 , and comprises two major subunits of Mr 20
000 and Mr 21
000 respectively, and a minor subunit of
Mr 30
000. The RPE absorption spectrum shows three peaks with a maximum of 565 nm. This paper briefly describes several procedures
for the extraction and purification of the protein. Most are classical methods and include the grinding of algae in buffer solutions and
purification by chromatography or preparative electrophoresis. A new approach, based on cell wall hydrolysis by enzymes such as
xylanases and/or cellulases, was developed to obtain the RPE protein without the crushing of raw material. The pigment obtained is
then purified in one step using preparative electrophoresis. This enzymatic extraction of RPE produces a non denatured pigment, and
this recently patented biotechnological approach can be performed on a large scale. Here, the pros and cons of different extraction
modes are discussed, and the main uses and potential applications of phycoerythrin in food and biotechnological sectors are presented.
Keywords: macroalgae, R-phycoerythrin, enzymatic extraction process, biotechnological applications
Applied Biotechnology, Food Science and Policy 2003:1(1)
2
Fleurence
diagnoses. It is especially used as a fluorescent label in
immunoassay like other phycobiliproteins (Kronick and
Grossman 1983; Kronick 1986). RPE obtained from
Corallina officinalis or from Porphyra tenera (Nori) is
marketed by companies that specialise in the purchase of
biochemical reagents. Generally, the price of this pigment
is between 180 and 250 US dollars/mg, making RPE a
molecule of high value when extracted from algae.
Extraction processes of
phycoerythrin
Classical processes
The phycobiliproteins, especially phycoerythrin (PE), can
be extracted by soaking the seaweeds in water for several
days (Siegelman and Kycia 1978). This method extracts
the proteins by osmotic shock (Fleurence and Guyader
1995). However, this type of extraction takes a long time
and a partial degradation of phycoerythrin by the proteases
is the main disadvantage of this method.
Currently, most procedures used for the extraction of
RPE are based on cell wall breakage. In Corallina officinalis,
the macroalga is ground in liquid nitrogen and the resulting
powder is homogenised in the sodium phosphate buffer
pH 7.1 (Hilditch et al 1991). The pigment is further purified
by successive chromatographies (gel filtration and anion
exchange techniques). The same procedure based on the
mechanical grinding of frozen seaweeds was applied to the
extraction of RPE from red algae such as Phyllophora
antartica (MacColl et al 1996) or P. palmata (Galland-
Irmouli et al 2000). For P. palmata, however, the RPE was
purified by preparative electrophoresis after seaweed
grinding.
Grinding in liquid nitrogen is used to facilitate the
destruction of the cell wall, which is the main obstacle to
accessing and extracting the algal proteins. However, this
approach is not totally efficient for cell wall degradation
and is also costly on an industrial scale.
Alternative extraction methods for RPE or seaweed
proteins were investigated, and enzymatic hydrolysis of the
cell wall was suggested as another way of accessing algal
protein (Amano and Noda 1990; Fleurence 1999b).
Enzymatic processes
The biochemical composition of the cell wall is different
according to seaweed species. In rhodophyta P. palmata
(dulse), the cell wall mainly comprises a matrix of
polysaccharides [β- (1,3) / (1,4) D-Xylans] including a little
proportion of cellulose (3% w/w) and probably proteins
(Deniaud et al forthcoming). Regarding this composition, a
new strategy for algal protein extraction based on the
degradation of the cell wall by specific enzymes was
elaborated. In this context, the action of xylanases and
cellulases alone or coupled was tested. Xylanases and
cellulases were obtained from Aspergillus aculeatus and
Trichoderma resei, respectively. The optimal effect on the
extraction of RPE was observed with the combined action
of xylanases and cellulases. These data contradict those
previously describing the combined action of xylanases
(Disporotrichum sp) and cellulases (Trichoderma viride)
Figure 1 Structure of R-Phycoerythrin chromophoric group.
Table 1 Effect of the use of xylanases and cellulases activities
on the R-phycoerythrin extraction recovery
Yield recovery
of RPE
(% expressed
Temperature % Cellulase % Xylanases in total protein
(C°) pH /Substrate /Substrate extracted)
20 6 3.5 3.5 8.21
30 5 2 2 3.97
30 5 5 5 2.50
30 7 2 2 7.45
30 7 5 2 6.82
30 7 5 5 10.01
40 6 3.5 3.5 4.02
40 6 3.5 0.5 8.05
50 7 5 5 2.67
60 6 3.5 3.5 2.21
Applied Biotechnology, Food Science and Policy 2003:1(1) 3
R-phycoerythrin from red macroalgae
on protein extraction from P. palmata (Fleurence et al 1995).
However, the different biological source of xylanases could
explain this contradiction.
The better yield in phycoerythrin recovery (10% of RPE/
total protein extracted) was obtained with xylanases and
cellulases combined action at 30
°C at pH 7 over 4 hours
(Table 1). The ratios xylanases/algae and cellulases/algae
for an optimal extraction were 5% (w/w) (Table 1). On the
other hand, higher incubation temperatures (≥40
°C) or
lower pH (6≤ pH) led to a large decrease in the RPE recovery
yield (
–
70%) (Table 1). The RPE obtained after the
application of enzymatic processes was further purified
according to a standard protocol based on the use of
preparative electrophoresis (Galland-Irmouli et al 2000).
The amount of RPE extracted by enzymatic hydrolysis of
cell wall can reach 4 mg/g of dry alga. This is higher than
those generally recorded from procedures that grind
seaweeds (Table 2). The phycoerythrin obtained by this
Table 2 R-phycoerythrin (RPE) recovery yield comparison
according to the extraction and purification methods
Extraction and RPE
purification methods (mg/g of alga dry weight)
Grinding of frozen algae 0.40 (small scale purification)
Chromatography techniques 0.6 (large scale purification)
(Hilditch et al 1991)
Grinding of frozen algae 0.45
Preparative electophoresis
(Galland Irmouli et al 2000)
Cell wall enzymatic hydrolysis 4
Preparative electrophoresis
(Fleurence et al 2002)
94
67
43
30
20
kDa
R-phycoerythrin
Figure 2 Purity evaluation by SDS PAGE of R-phycoerythrin obtained by
enzymatic process and purified by preparative electrophoresis. (Experimental
conditions: I= 30 mA, time= 1h, stacking gel: 4
% acrylamide, separating gel: 12
%
(w/v), determination of RPE subunits: fluorescence emission and molecular
weight determination in SDS PAGE.)
-0,2
-0,15
-0,1
-0,05
0
0,05
450 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650
nm
Absorbance
Figure 3 Spectrum of R-phycoerythrin obtained by extraction enzymatic process and purified by preparative electrophoresis.
simple protocol is pure (Figure 2) and shows the main
spectral characteristics (λ max = 565 nm, a peak at 499 nm
and a shoulder at 545 nm) of the non denatured pigment
(Figure 3).
Therefore, enzymatic process is not denaturant for the
pigment and it obtains a better yield in the recovery of RPE.
An international patent request (Fleurence et al 2002)
regarding the use of this biotechnical approach to improve
the extraction of P. palmata proteins and the nutritional
value, which is estimated by the in vitro digestibility method
(Savoie and Gauthier 1986), has been registered.
Applied Biotechnology, Food Science and Policy 2003:1(1)
4
Fleurence
In addition, the size of proteins extracted is different
according to the activities of enzymes used in cell wall
degradation. For instance, the action of β glucanase (from
Aspergillus niger) on P. palmata allows extraction of
proteins showing a large distribution of molecular weights
(10 kDa <MW < 100 kDa) (Figure 4a). This is not the case
with the combined action of xylanases and cellulases for
which extraction of proteins possessing molecular weights
distributing between 90 and 30 kDa was observed (Figure
4b). Therefore, the enzymatic treatment of P. palmata algae
appears as a flexible method that allows the extraction of
proteins with different molecular sizes.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10 P11 P12 P13 P14 P15 P16 P17
Proteins extracted
Molecular weight (kDa)
Figure 4a Molecular weight ranges of Palmaria palmata proteins extracted by the enzymatic maceration (β-glucanases action). (Experimental conditions:
temperature: 40 °C incubation time: 6 h, determination of molecular weights: SDS PAGE.)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
Proteins extracted
Molecular weight (kDa)
Figure 4b Molecular weight ranges of Palmaria palmata proteins extracted by the enzymatic maceration (xylanase and cellulase combined action). (Experimental
conditions: temperature: 40 °C incubation time: 6 h, determination of molecular weights: SDS PAGE.)
Applied Biotechnology, Food Science and Policy 2003:1(1) 5
R-phycoerythrin from red macroalgae
Present and potential applications
of R-phycoerythrin
R-phycoerythrin is a fluorescent pigment that shows thermal
stability up to 60
°C (D’Agnolo et al 1993; Galland-Irmouli
et al 2000). RPE obtained from P. palmata is stable between
pH 3.5 and 9.5. These conditions are favourable for using
phycoerythrin as a colourant in the elaboration of cosmetic
or food products. However, the economic cost associated
with the extraction of RPE by classical means is a strong
deterrent for this type of industrial application. Conversely,
the use of enzymatic maceration could decrease the cost of
extraction especially if commercial enzymes are employed.
This is possible for some enzymatic activities previously
cited, such as the xylanases (shearzyme) or cellulases
(celluclast), which are commercially available and can be
purchased from Novo. Due to a lack of economic evaluation
for enzymatic extractive procedure used on a large scale, it
is as yet unknown if this new methodology could be cheaper
than the classical methods.
The original spectral properties and especially
fluorescence emission are the main advantages for a
biotechnical use of this algal pigment. Phycoerythrin
possesses an exceptionally high molar absorption coefficient
(near 2.4
×
106 M–1cm–1) and a quantum yield near 0.8, giving
the molecule a high sensitivity. PE emits in the orange-red
(fluorescence emission maxima = 580 nm), a spectral zone
where background fluorescence is exceptionally low. In
addition, RPE displays very intense fluorescence more than
20 times larger than those recorded for a molecular probe
such as fluorescein. Moreover, phycoerythrin shows optical
properties (eg lack of fluorescence background) appropriate
for use in molecular imaging 3-D technique (Chen et al
1997).
For these reasons, phycoerythrin conjugates, such as
antibody complex protein A-phycoerythrin and avidin-
phycoerythrin complexes, and can be used as a fluorescent
probe in flow cytometry, microscopy or immunoassay. The
use of RPE as a probe to evaluate the proximity or the
interaction between two molecules by fluorescence
resonance energy transfer (FRET) (Ha et al 1996) is also a
new perspective for the application of this algal pigment
(Galland-Irmouli et al 2000).
RPE subunits carry chromophoric groups and are
characterised by a deep rose colour. This property coupled
with the low molecular weight of subunits (Mr 20
000) is
an opportunity for using RPE as an internal marker in
electrophoretic techniques (non denaturant electrophoresis,
SDS-PAGE, isoelectrofocusing) (Araoz et al 1998) and size-
gel exclusion chromatography.
The utilisation of RPE for these biological properties
could also be another way to increase the valorisation
opportunities of this algal pigment. However, few studies
about the biological activities of this pigment are available,
presenting an opening for future research.
Currently, two main types of activities are linked to RPE:
anti parasitic and anti-tumour activities. Notably, RPE was
described as a defensive substance contained in the ink of
the marine mollusc Aplysia californica (Coelho et al 1998).
In this example, the pigment is provided by the red seaweeds
constituting the diet of the marine snail, and is further
modified by the animal digestion process.
Recently, anti-cancer activity was recorded for the RPE
and these three subunits α, β, γ (Bei et al 2002). The
experimentations were performed on cellular models (mouse
tumour cells, human liver carcinoma cells). The occlusion
of tumour blood vessels with the induction of cell
programmed death (apoptosis) appears to be the main
mechanism of RPE subunits. In addition, the natural
fluorescence of pigment subunits appears useful to follow
the pigment internalisation in the tumour cells.
Conclusion
R-phycoerythrin is an original pigment showing spectral
and biological properties of interest for industrial
application. The development of new extraction methods
such as enzymatic processes could decrease the economic
cost of obtaining RPE. Moreover, application of cell wall
enzymatic hydrolysis to improve protein extraction is also
applicable to other algae, and was successfully tested on
green seaweeds belonging to Ulva genus (Fleurence et al
1995). For these algae, enzymatic extractive process based
on application of cellulase, hemicellulase and β glucanase
mixture gave protein recovery yields comparable (18%–
22% expressed according to the total proteins) to those
recorded for efficient but denaturing chemical methods (eg
extraction with strong alkalis).
These previous works also demonstrated that each
process had to be adapted according to the chemical nature
of the cell wall. At present, lack of knowledge on cell wall
structure and sometimes the poor availability of some
enzymes appear to be the main restrictions to using this
biotechnical approach.
Nevertheless, cell wall enzymatic hydrolysis remains a
promising method for the extraction of proteins with high
Applied Biotechnology, Food Science and Policy 2003:1(1)
6
Fleurence
value, in non denaturant conditions. It could, for instance,
be tested for the extraction of particular phycoerythrins such
as the R-phycoerythrin IV found in Antarctic seaweeds or
B-phycoerythrin which is specific to the bangiale family
(eg Porphyra sp or Porhyridium sp).
References
Amano H, Noda H. 1990. Proteins from protoplasts from red alga Porphyra
yezoensis. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 56:1859–64.
Aroaz R, Lebert M, Häder DP. 1998. Electrophoretic applications of
phycobiliproteins. Electrophoresis, 19:215–19.
Bei H, Guang-Ce W, Chen-Kui Z, Zhen-Gang L. 2002. The experimental
research of R-phycoerythrin subunits on cancer treatment: a new
photosensitizer in PDT. Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 17:35–42.
Chen Z, Kaplan DL, Yang K, Kumar J, Marx KA, Triparthy SK. 1997.
Two-photons induced fluorescence from phycoerythrin protein. Appl
Opt, 36:1655–9.
Coelho L, Prince J, Nolen TG. 1998. Processing of defensive pigment in
Aplysia Californica: acquisition, modification and mobilization of
the red algal pigment R-phycoerythrin by the digestive gland. J Exp
Biol, 201:425–38.
D’Agnolo E, Rizzo R, Paoletti S, Murano E. 1993. A biliprotein from the
red alga Gracilaria longa: thermal stability of R-phycoerythrin. Ital
J Biochem, 42:316–18.
D’Agnolo E, Rizzo R, Paoletti S, Murano E. 1994. R-phycoerythrin from
the red alga Gracilaria longa. Phytochemistry, 35:693–6.
Deniaud E, Fleurence J, Lahaye M. Interactions of the mix-linked β-(1,3)/
β-(1,4)-D xylans in the cell walls of Palmaria palmata (Rhodophyta).
J Phycol. Forthcoming.
Fleurence J. 1999a. Seaweed proteins: biochemical, nutritional aspects
and potential uses. Trends Food Sci Technol, 103:25–8.
Fleurence J. 1999b. The enzymatic degradation of algal cell walls: a useful
approach for improving protein accessibility? J Appl Phycol, 11:
313–14.
Fleurence J, Antoine E, Luçon M. 2002. Method for extracting and
improving digestibility of Palmaria palmata proteins. PCT WO 02/
07528 A1. Paris: Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle.
Fleurence J, Guyader O. 1995. Contribution of electrophoresis of red
seaweeds (Gracilaria sp) used as food ingredients. Sci Aliments,
15:43–8.
Fleurence J, Le Coeur C, Mabeau S, Maurice M, Landreein A. 1995.
Comparison of different extractive procedures for proteins from edible
seaweeds Ulva rigida and Ulva rotundata. J Appl Phycol, 7:577–82.
Fleurence J, Massiani L, Guyader O, Mabeau S. 1995. Use of enzymatic
cell wall degradation for improvement of protein extraction from
Chondrus crispus, Gracilaria verrucosa and Palmaria palmata. J
Appl Phycol, 7:393–7.
Galland-Irmouli AV, Pons L, Luçon M, Villaume C, Mrabet NT, Guéant
JL, Fleurence J. 2000. One-step purification of R-phycoerythrin from
red macroalga Palmaria palmata using preparative polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis. J Chromatogr B, 117–23.
Gantt E. 1990. Pigmentation and photoacclimation. In Cole KM, Sheat
RG, eds. Biology of red algae. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr. 203–
19.
Glazer AN. 1984. Phycobilisomes: a macromolecular complex optimised
for light energy transfer. Biochim Biophys Acta, 768:29–51.
Ha T, Enderle T, Ogletree DF, Chemla DS, Selvin PR, Weiss S. 1996.
Probing the interaction between two single molecules: fluorescence
resonance energy transfer between a single donor and a single
acceptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93:6264–8.
Hilditch CM, Balding P, Jenkins R, Smith AJ, Rogers LJ. 1991. R-
phycoerythrin from the macroalga Coralina officinalis
(Rhodophyceae) and application of a derived phycofluor probe for
detecting sugar-binding sites on cell membranes. J Appl Phycol,
3:345–54.
Indegaard M, Minsaas J. 1991. Animal and human nutrition. In Guiry
MD, Blunden G, eds. Seaweed resources in Europe. Uses and
potential. Wiley. p 21–64.
Kronick MN. 1986. The use of phycobiliproteins as fluorescent labels in
immunoassay. J Immunol Methods, 92:1–13.
Kronick MN, Grossman AR. 1983. Immunoassay techniques with
fluorescent phycobiliproteins conjugates. Clin Chem, 29:1582–6.
MacColl R, Eisele LE, Williams EC, Bowser S. 1996. The discovery of a
novel R-phycoerythrin from Antarctic red alga. J Biol Chem,
271:17157–60.
Morgan KC, Wright JLC, Simpson FJ. 1980. Review of chemical
constituents of the red alga Palmaria palmata (Dulse). Eco Bot, 34:27–
50.
Redlinger T, Gantt E. 1982. A Mr 95,000 polypeptide in Porphyridium
cruentum phycobilisomes and thylakoids: possible function in linkage
of phycobilisomes to thylakoids and energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA, 79:5542–6.
Roman RB, Alvarez JM, Fernandez FGA, Grima EM. 2002. Recovery of
pure B-phycoerythrin from the microalga Porphyridium cruentum. J
Biotechnol, 93:73–85.
Rüdiger W. 1994. Phycobiliproteins and phycobilins. In Round FE,
Chapman DJ, eds. Progress in phycological research. London:
Biopress. p 97–135.
Savoie L, Gauthier SF. 1986. Dialysis cell for the in vitro measurement of
protein digestibility. J Food Sci, 51:494–8.
Siegelman HW, Kycia JH. 1978. Algal biliproteins. In Hellebust J, Craigie
JS, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ Pr. p 71–9.
Talarico L. 1996. Phycobiliproteins and phycobilisomes in red algae:
adaptive responses to light. Sci Mar, 60:205–22.