Content uploaded by Beat Oertli
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Beat Oertli on May 02, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
THE ROLE OF PONDS
The ecological role of ponds in a changing world
Re
´gis Ce
´re
´ghino •Dani Boix •
Henry-Michel Cauchie •
Koen Martens •Beat Oertli
Received: 14 October 2013 / Accepted: 19 October 2013 / Published online: 7 November 2013
ÓSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Abstract The fifth conference of the European Pond
Conservation Network (Luxembourg, June 2012)
brought together researchers, environmental manag-
ers, and other stakeholders with the aim to share state-
of-the-art knowledge on the ecology, management,
and conservation of ponds in the context of the many
challenges facing the wider water environment.
Although well-known ecological patterns apply to
most ponds in Europe and elsewhere, recent data
highlight that part of the environmental variables
governing pond biodiversity remain specific to cli-
matic/biogeographic regions and to elevation ranges,
suggesting that, in addition to common practice,
management plans should include range-specific
measures. Beyond the contribution of individual
ponds to the aquatic and terrestrial life, connected
networks of ponds are vital in the provision of new
climate space as a response to global climate change,
by allowing the observed northward and/or upward
movements of species. In terms of services, ponds
offer sustainable solutions to key issues of water
management and climate change such as nutrient
retention, rainfall interception, or carbon sequestra-
tion. While the ecological role of ponds is now well-
established, authoritative research-based advice
remains needed to inform future direction in the
conservation of small water bodies and to further
bridge the gap between science and practice.
Keywords Biological diversity Conservation
Climate change Ecosystem services
Freshwater ecology
Guest editors: R. Ce
´re
´ghino, D. Boix, H.-M. Cauchie,
K. Martens & B. Oertli / Understanding the role of ponds in a
changing world
R. Ce
´re
´ghino (&)
INP, UPS EcoLab (Laboratoire Ecologie Fonctionnelle et
Environnement), Universite
´de Toulouse,
31062 Toulouse, France
e-mail: regis.cereghino@univ-tlse3.fr
R. Ce
´re
´ghino
CNRS, EcoLab (UMR-CNRS 5245), 118 Route de
Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France
D. Boix
Institut d’Ecologia Aqua
`tica, Universitat de Girona
(UdG), Girona, Campus Montilivi, 17071 Girona,
Catalonia, Spain
H.-M. Cauchie
Centre de Recherche Public Gabriel Lippman, 41, Rue du
Brill, 4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
K. Martens
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat
29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
B. Oertli
University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland,
Hepia Lullier, 150 Route de Presinge, 1254 Jussy-Geneva,
Switzerland
123
Hydrobiologia (2014) 723:1–6
DOI 10.1007/s10750-013-1719-y
Introduction
Worldwide, ponds of both natural of human origin
occur in all biogeographical regions, from desert to
tundra pools in the Arctic Circle. Estimates suggest
that there are 277,400,000 ponds less than 1 hectare in
size, plus 24,120,000 water bodies ranging from 1 to
10 ha, thus representing over 90% of the global 304
millions standing waterbodies, or 30% of global
standing water by surface area (Downing et al.,
2006). A literature search among the peer-reviewed,
scientific journals suggests that the number of papers
on pond biodiversity published per year has tripled
over the past decade (source: Thomson Reuters’ Web
of Knowledge
SM
, August 2013). In the context of
changing world (climate, landscapes, water uses, and
environmental policies), we can now ascertain that
ponds are biodiversity hotspots both in terms of
species composition and biological traits, and have a
significant role to play in the provision of ecosystem
services (EPCN, 2008). In addition, available data
point toward the idea that artificial, ‘‘man-made’’
ponds are not fundamentally ecologically different
from the ‘‘natural’’ ones (de Marco et al., 2013).
Biological diversity of man-made ponds in farmed and
urban landscapes was unambiguously related to well-
known ecological patterns (regionalization of assem-
blages, species-area effect, and successional patterns;
Declerck et al., 2006;Ce
´re
´ghino et al., 2008b; Ruhı
´
et al., 2012) rather than to particular uses (Scher &
Thie
´ry, 2005; Ruggiero et al., 2008; Le Viol et al.,
2009). In other words, with their small catchments,
ponds of all origins are a practical conservation
solution waiting to happen.
Combining information collected at sites across
Europe which represent a geographical distribution of
biodiversity found in the Atlantic, Central, and Med-
iterranean regions, it becomes apparent that freshwater
species show higher biogeographic turnover in com-
position and traits in ponds than in other extensive
freshwater habitats (Ce
´re
´ghino et al., 2012). On a local
to regional scale, we know that the value of ponds for
freshwater diversity lies in the varied network of
habitats that they provide (Davies et al., 2008), even in
urban areas (Gaston et al., 2005; Vermonden et al.,
2010). While pond biologists have focused on the
aquatic biota, it is noteworthy that the interactions at
the aquatic–terrestrial interface are numerous, and the
high productivity of ponds is profitable to the terrestrial
biocoenoses (Mozley, 1944; Baxter et al., 2005).
Emerging adult insects are heavily preyed on by bats,
birds, and spiders. Amphibians are preyed on by
snakes, eagles, owls, ravens, buzzards, herons, wild
boars, stoats, minks, martens, foxes, and badgers, while
the water shrew (Neomys fodiens) comes directly to
feed underwater on macroinvertebrate larvae.
In terms of services, ponds offer sustainable
solutions to some of the key issues of water manage-
ment and climate change. Ponds can remove diffuse
pollutants from surface waters, including sediment,
phosphorous, and nitrogen. For example, in the
intensively farmed landscape of northern Germany,
ponds strategically located to intercept water from
drainage systems can significantly reduce the nutrient
load of receiving waters through denitrification,
sedimentation processes and uptake from wetland
plants (Steidl et al., 2008). Moreover, while the
purpose of such man-made ponds is related to water
management (i.e., nutrient retention), biodiversity
may benefit from their presence and heterogeneity
(Becerra-Jurado et al., 2012; Herrmann, 2012). Stra-
tegically located pond networks have the potential to
hold water back at source, recharge aquifers, and
reduce the volumes of water generated before they
become a problem. Modeling studies in the United
Kingdom have shown that by installing 10,000 m
3
of
storage per km
2
, roughly equivalent to ten medium-
sized ponds, it is possible to capture all of a typical
heavy rainfall event from that km
2
, significantly
reducing water loss (Quinn et al., 2007). Because of
their huge number, farm ponds may globally sequester
as much carbon as the oceans (Downing et al., 2008).
A single 500 m
2
pond could sequester yearly 1000 kg
of carbon, i.e., as much as that produced by a car
during the same time period. Such selected, striking
examples support the case for the use of pond
protection and/or creation to help ameliorate climate
change and facilitate water resource management, and
emphasize the importance of considering the pond
resource as a whole rather than as individual sites.
More recently, ponds appeared as vital in the
provision of new climate space as a response to global
climate change (Rosset & Oertli, 2011). Without
connected networks of ponds, many amphibians and
invertebrates, for example, will be unable to undertake
the observed northward movement of species (Ott,
2001; Walther et al., 2002) (or upward movement in
the mountains), further threatening species existence
2 Hydrobiologia (2014) 723:1–6
123
(Ilg & Oertli, 2013). To enable the aquatic organisms
associated with ponds to adapt to climate change,
spatial land use planning from the European to local
level needs to provide opportunities for these taxa to
move through the landscape. Consequently, spatial
planners are key stakeholders in the development of
pond conservation. Spatial planning should encourage
measures that enable the pond biota to adapt to climate
change in particular by increasing connectivity, nota-
bly between the NATURA 2000 sites.
In this general context, continuing the series of
European Pond Conservation Network conferences,
the 5th EPCN meeting (Luxembourg, June 2012)
brought together researchers, environmental manag-
ers, and other stakeholders with the aim to share state-
of-the-art knowledge on the ecology, management,
and conservation of ponds in the context of the many
challenges facing the wider water environment. This
special issue gathers some of the key information
presented by international contributors, and provides
an overview of current basic and applied issues on the
ecological role of ponds as regards biological conser-
vation, ecosystem services, and the mitigation of
climate change effects on species.
The 5th EPCN conference
The keynote presentations, oral and poster contribu-
tions were distributed among 10 topics forming
sessions that covered the multi-faceted aspects of
relevant knowledge about ponds in the fields of socio-
economy, conservation and management of species,
pond ecosystems, and pondscapes, functional and
evolutionary ecology, and landscape ecology. In
addition, three workshops were devoted to the
practical conservation of ponds, pond policy within
the EU Water Framework Directive, and ponds and
local culture.
One-hundred and ten researchers and practitioners
from 19 countries attended the conference. It is
noteworthy that participants were more evenly dis-
tributed among represented countries than during the
former 2008 and 2010 conferences and that contrib-
utors from countries outside Europe (the USA, Israel,
Uruguay, Brazil, and Morocco) were present too, thus
achieving the EPCN’s objective to better disseminate
the value of the Network (Ce
´re
´ghino et al., 2008a;
Boix et al., 2012). Still, the conference mostly
attracted scientists. The content and extent of the
projects led by EPCN scientists and the related oral
and poster presentations (as well as recent publica-
tions), however, show that projects of EPCN members
clearly include collaborations with groups of stake-
holders as well as Actions aiming at influencing and
informing those people who have a direct impact upon
the European pond resource. Under this perspective,
we claim that both the success of pond research within
the framework of competitive calls for proposals and
the ‘‘success stories’’ experienced by pond managers/
conservationist are tightly linked to the collaborative
work that researchers and managers increasingly
develop in practice (see examples on the EPCN
website: www.europeanponds.org).
Highlights
Species–area relationships, habitat heterogeneity, and
surrounding environments are well-known key drivers
for local pond diversity. Jeliazkov et al. (2013)
emphasize, however, that species richness signifi-
cantly increases with pond density from local to
regional levels. In landscapes experiencing rapid
environmental changes, ponds indeed provide vital
stepping stones that are essential for the migration,
dispersal, and genetic exchange of wild species,
including those species which range over large areas
(birds and mammals) but require ponds as part of the
mosaic of wetland habitats they exploit. Where pond
density has declined, replacement through pond
creation could also restore previously fragmented
wetland landscapes (Dalbeck & Weinberg, 2009).
While the difference between large ponds and small
lakes is often debated (Oertli et al., 2005), Hamerlik
et al. (2013) report an interesting ecological threshold
separating alpine pond and lake systems, where, at a
surface area of 2 ha, the species-area pattern changes
significantly (alpha diversity was not related to area for
water bodies below 2 ha, but was positively correlated
with area in larger systems). The significant effects of
incoming detritus and incident light upon pond com-
munity diversity, however, reveal that changes in local
environments (e.g., the conversion of forest to crop-
ping systems) strongly influence food webs in small
water bodies (De
´zerald et al., 2013). The set of
environmental variables governing pond biodiversity
(both in terms of community composition and species
Hydrobiologia (2014) 723:1–6 3
123
traits) is to some extent specific to climatic/biogeo-
graphic regions (Ruhı
´et al., 2013; de Marco et al.,
2013; see also Ce
´re
´ghino et al., 2012) and to elevation
ranges (Ilg & Oertli, 2013). Therefore, although
biological diversity could be favoured by a common
set of pond management practices, data point toward
the idea that management plans should include eleva-
tion- and/or region-specific measures.
Life histories, dispersal patterns, and biological
interactions (notably the trophic ones) also play major
roles in determining pond biodiversity (Blaustein
et al., 2013). Life history patterns enable many
temporally segregated populations to utilize small
ecosystems by reducing competition for space and
habitat resources (de Andrade et al., 2013; see also
Cayrou & Ce
´re
´ghino, 2005). Colonization dynamics
strongly influence within and among population
genetic variation and evolutionary potential of popu-
lations (Ortells et al., 2013), and more specifically,
predators play a key role in generating patterns of food
web topology across regional environments (De
´zerald
et al., 2013). Like other freshwater (and terrestrial)
habitat types, ponds are subjected to species introduc-
tions (Rodriguez-Perez et al., 2013). Species richness
typically decreases when fish are present (Ruggiero
et al., 2008). Many fish species are predators to
macroinvertebrates, while those species introduced to
serve anthropogenic purposes (e.g., mosquitofish) can
cause substantial injuries to large numbers of larval
amphibians in a wetland (Shulse & Semlitsch, 2013).
Other introduced species like crayfish or mute swans
are likely to impact either native species (e.g.,
amphibians) and habitat structure (e.g., macrophyte
beds; Gayet et al., 2013), but the extent of adverse
impacts generated by these species appears to be
density-dependent.
Although ponds are small wetland features, they
may be regarded as key components of wider
landscapes. Compared to other surface waters, ponds
still receive little effective protection from legislation
or policy. More specifically, despite much interest in
the management of catchments, protection of ponds
through landscape scale protection measures is rarely
achieved. In this context, the Important Areas for
Ponds (IAP) concept proposed and developed by Pond
Conservation in the UK (Pond Conservation, 2007)
and the European Pond Conservation Network may
serve as a relevant scheme (see an outline at http://
campus.hesge.ch/epcn/projects_propond.asp). IAPs
are conceptually similar to the Important Bird Areas
(IBAs proposed by Birdlife International) and the
Important Plant Areas (IPAs by Plantlife Interna-
tional). Owing to the wide distribution of ponds, IAPs
concern large areas of the landscape, thereby calling
for landscape level management plans.
The ecological role and more generally the value of
ponds in our landscapes are better established than a
few years ago. In light of expected economic devel-
opment, authoritative research-based advice is now
needed to inform future direction in the conservation
of small water bodies. Initiatives such as the European
Pond Conservation Network play such a role by
bringing together scientists, practitioners, and policy
makers. To date, most ongoing projects led by EPCN
members clearly aim at strengthening our understand-
ing of pond biodiversity, ecosystem services, and the
links between these two aspects. Hence, we may
expect a flourish of relevant information to come and,
hopefully, the 6th EPCN conference to be held in
September 2014 in Huesca (Spain) should provide
opportunities to learn more about pond ecology, and
will certainly further contribute to bridge the gap
between science and practice.
Acknowledgments The fifth conference of the European
Pond Conservation Network has been made possible thanks to
funding by the Fonds National de la Recherche (Luxembourg)
(Convention FNR/12/AM3/15) and the Centre de Recherche
Public –Gabriel Lippmann. Many thanks are due to the local
organizers L. Hoffmann, C. Penny, D. Collard, C. Walczak, B.
Fauvel, S. Bonot, and O. Marquis. Mr G. Schmidt is sincerely
thanked for organizing the field trip in relation to the EU-LIFE
Loutre project. The scientific program of the conference has
been set in collaboration with Dr A. Hull (Liverpool John
Moores University, UK), Dr Pascale Nicolet (Pond
Conservation, UK), Dr Jeremy Biggs (Pond Conservation,
UK), and Dr T. Kalettka (Centre for Agricultural Landscape
research, Germany).
References
Baxter, C. V., K. D. Fausch & W. C. Saunders, 2005. Tangled
webs: reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams
and riparian zones. Freshwater Biology 50: 201–220.
Becerra-Jurado, G., R. Harrington & M. Kelly-Quinn, 2012. A
review of the potential of surface flow constructed wet-
lands to enhance macroinvertebrate diversity in agricul-
tural landscapes with particular reference to Integrated
Constructed Wetlands (ICWs). Hydrobiologia 692:
121–130.
Blaustein, J., A. Sadeh & L. Blaustein, 2013. Influence of fire
salamander larvae on among-pool distribution of mosquito
4 Hydrobiologia (2014) 723:1–6
123
egg rafts: oviposition habitat selection or egg raft preda-
tion? Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1554-1.
Boix, D., J. Biggs, R. Ce
´re
´ghino, A. P. Hull, T. Kalettka & B.
Oertli, 2012. Pond research and management in Europe –
small is beautiful. Hydrobiologia 689: 1–9.
Cayrou, J. & R. Ce
´re
´ghino, 2005. Life cycle phenology of some
aquatic insects: implications for pond conservation.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
15: 559–571.
Ce
´re
´ghino, R., J. Biggs, S. Declerck & B. Oertli, 2008a. The
ecology of European ponds: defining the characteristics of
a neglected freshwater habitat. Hydrobiologia 597: 1–6.
Ce
´re
´ghino, R., A. Ruggiero, P. Marty & S. Ange
´libert, 2008b.
Biodiversity and distribution patterns of freshwater inver-
tebrates in farm ponds of a southwestern French agricul-
tural landscape. Hydrobiologia 597: 43–51.
Ce
´re
´ghino, R., B. Oertli, M. Bazzanti, C. Coccia, A. Compin, J.
Biggs, N. Bressi, P. Grillas, A. Hull, T. Kalettka & O.
Scher, 2012. Biological traits of European pond macroin-
vertebrates. Hydrobiologia 689: 51–61.
Dalbeck, L. & K. Weinberg, 2009. Artificial ponds: a substitute
for natural beaver ponds in a central European Highland
(Eifel, Germany ?). Hydrobiologia 630: 49–62.
Davies, B., J. Biggs, P. Williams, M. Whitfield, P. Nicolet, D.
Sear, S. Bray & S. Maund, 2008. Comparative biodiversity
of aquatic habitats in the European agricultural landscape.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 125: 1–8.
de Andrade, E. V. E., I. J. L. Palhas & G. J. B. de Moura,
2013. Diurnal habitat segregation by tadpoles in two
temporary ponds in an Atlantic Rainforest Remnant,
Northeastern Brazil. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-
013-1645-z.
de Marco, P., D. S. Nogueira, C. Costa Correa, T. Bernardi
Vieira, K. Dias Silva, N. Silva Pinto, D. Bichsel, A.
S. Victoriano Hirota, R. R. Silva Vieira, F. Melo Carniero,
A. A. Bispo de Oliveira, P. Carvalho, R. Pereira Bastos, C.
Ilg & B. Oertli, 2013. Patterns in the organization of Cer-
rado pond biodiversity in Brazilian pasture landscapes.
Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1695-2.
Declerck, S., T. De Bie, D. Ercken, H. Hampel, S. Schrijvers, J.
VanWichelen, V. Gillard, R. Mandiki, B. Losson, D.
Bauwens, S. Keijers, W. Vyverman, B. Goddeeris, L. De
Meester, L. Brendonck & K. Martens, 2006. Ecological
characteristics of small farmland ponds: associations with
land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biological
Conservation 131: 523–532.
De
´zerald, O., S. Talaga, C. Leroy, J. F. Carrias, B. Corbara, A.
Dejean & R. Ce
´re
´ghino, 2013. Environmental determi-
nants of macroinvertebrate diversity in small water bodies:
insights from tank-bromeliads. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.
1007/s10750-013-1464-2.
Downing,J. A., Y. T. Prairie, J. J. Cole, C. M. Duarte, L. J. Tranvik,
R. G. Striegl,W. H. McDowell, P. Kortelainen, N. F. Caraco,
J. M. Melack& J. J. Middelburg, 2006. The globalabundance
and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments.
Limnology and Oceanography 51: 2388–2397.
Downing, J. A., J. J. Cole, J. J. Middelburg, R. G. Striegl, C.
M. Duarte, P. Kortelainen, Y. T. Prairie & K. A. Laube,
2008. Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally
eutrophic impoundments over the last century. Global
Biogeochemical Cycles 22: GB1018. doi:10.1029/
2006GB002854.
EPCN, 2008. The Pond Manifesto. Available: http://campus.
hesge.ch/epcn/projects.asp.
Gaston, K. J., R. M. Smith, K. Thompson & P. H. Warren, 2005.
Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods
for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation
14: 395–413.
Gayet, G., G. Matthieu, P. Defos du Rau & P. Grillas, 2013.
Effects of mute swans on wetlands: a synthesis. Hydrobi-
ologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1704-5.
Hamerlı
´k, L., M. Svitok, M. Novikmec, M. Oc
ˇadlı
´k & Peter.
Bitus
ˇı
´k, 2013. among-site and regional diversity patterns of
benthic macroinvertebrates in high altitude waterbodies:
do ponds differ from lakes? Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/
s10750-013-1621-7.
Herrmann, J., 2012. Chemical and biological benefits in a
stormwater wetland in Kalmar, SE Sweden. Limnologica
42: 299–309.
Ilg, C. & B. Oertli, 2013. How can we conserve cold stenotherm
communities in warming Alpine ponds? Hydrobiologia.
doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1538-1.
Jeliazkov, A., F. Chiron, J. Garnier, A. Besnard, M. Silvestre &
F. Jiguet, 2013. Level-dependence of the relationships
between amphibian biodiversity and environment in pond
systems within an intensive agricultural landscape. Hyd-
robiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1503-z.
Le Viol, I., J. Mocq, R. Julliard & C. Kerbiriou, 2009. The
contribution of motorway stormwater retention ponds to
the biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates. Biological
Conservation 142: 3163–3171.
Mozley, A., 1944. Temporary ponds, a neglected natural
resource. Nature 154: 490.
Oertli, B., J. Biggs, R. Ce
´re
´ghino, P. Grillas, P. Joly & J.
B. Lachavanne, 2005. Conservation and monitoring of
pond biodiversity: introduction. Aquatic Conservation:
Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 535–540.
Ortells, R., J. VanoVerbeke, G. Louette & L. de Meester, 2013.
Colonization of Daphnia magna in a newly created pond:
founder effects and secondary immigrants. Hydrobiologia.
doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1593-7.
Ott, J. A., 2001. Expansion of Mediterranean Odonata in Ger-
many and Europe. Consequences of climatic changes. In
Walther, G. R., C. A. Burga & P. J. Edwards (eds), Fin-
gerprints of climate change. Adapted behaviour and shift-
ing species ranges. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers,
New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: 89–111.
Pond Conservation, 2007. A Preliminary Assessment of
Important Areas for Ponds (IAPs) in Wales. Report pro-
duced for Countryside Council for Wales: 68 pp.
Quinn, P.F., J.M. Hewett, J. Jonzyk, & V. Glenis, 2007. The
PROACTIVE approach to Farm Integrated Runoff Man-
agement (FIRM) plans. Flood storage on Farms. Newcastle
University. Available: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/iq/download/
PROACTIVEFloods.doc.
Rodriguez-Perez, H., H. Cayuela, S. Hilaire, A. Olivier & F.
Mesleard, 2013. Is the exotic red swamp crayfish (Pro-
cambarus clarkii) a current threat for the Mediterranean
tree frog (Hyla meridionalis) in the Camargue (Southern
France)? Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1481-1.
Hydrobiologia (2014) 723:1–6 5
123
Rosset, V. & B. Oertli, 2011. Freshwater biodiversity under
climate warming pressure: identifying the winners and
losers in temperate standing waterbodies. Biological
Conservation 144: 2311–2319.
Ruggiero, A., R. Ce
´re
´ghino, J. Figuerola, P. Marty & S. Ang-
e
´libert, 2008. Farm ponds make a contribution to the bio-
diversity of aquatic insects in a French agricultural
landscape. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331: 298–308.
Ruhı
´, A., J. Herrmann, S. Gasco
´n, J. Sala, J. Geijer & D. Boix,
2012. Change in biological traits and community structure
of macroinvertebrates through primary succession in a
man-made Swedish wetland. Freshwater Science 31:
22–37.
Ruhı
´, A., E. Chappuis, D. Escoriza, M. Jover, J. Sala, D. Boix, S.
Gasco
´n & E. Gacia, 2013. Environmental filtering deter-
mines community patterns in temporary wetlands – a
multi-taxon approach. Hydrobiologia. doi:10.1007/
s10750-013-1514-9.
Scher, O. & A. Thie
´ry, 2005. Odonata, Amphibia and envi-
ronmental characteristics in motorway stormwater reten-
tion ponds (Southern France). Hydrobiologia 551: 237–
251.
Shulse, C. D. & R. D. Semlitsch, 2013. Western Mosquitofish
(Gambusia affinis) bolster the prevalence and severity of
tadpole tail injuries in experimental wetlands. Hydrobio-
logia. doi:10.1007/s10750-013-1502-0.
Steidl, J., T. Kalettka, V. Ehlert, J. Quast & J. Augustin, 2008.
Mitigation of pressures on water bodies by nutrient reten-
tion from agricultural drainage effluents using purification
ponds. Proceedings of the 10th International Drainage
Workshop, Vol. 16. Helsinki University of Technology:
187–194.
Vermonden, K., R. Leuven, G. van der Velde, A. Hendriks, M.
van Katwijk, J. Roelofs, E. Lucassen, O. Pedersen & K.
Sand-Jensen, 2010. Species pool versus site limitations of
macrophytes in urban waters. Aquatic Sciences – Research
Across Boundaries 72: 379–389.
Walther, G. R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.
J. C. Beebee, J. M. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg & F.
Bairlein, 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate
change. Nature 416: 389–395.
6 Hydrobiologia (2014) 723:1–6
123