Victoria has over 35,000 wetlands, of which approximately 25,000 are defined as “naturally occurring”. These wetlands provide a number of ecosystem services and values. Many of these values are reliant on maintenance of the condition of wetlands.
Wetlands in Victoria are managed in accordance with the Victorian Waterway Management Strategy (VWMS). The VWMS identifies cropping as a threatening process to wetlands in fragmented landscapes and specifies a number of actions to address the risks to wetlands from cropping. Consistent with achieving the vision and actions of the VWMS, this project provides a review of the knowledge related to wetland values and cropping in the Victorian landscape. The information contained in this report can be used to inform policy development, prioritise research and develop management guidance for natural resource managers and landholders.
This review obtained information in three ways:
• literature review of written resources in grey and refereed published literature, unpublished reports and websites
• consultation with wetland managers (including farmers) and wetland researchers; and
• geospatial analysis of wetland distribution and cropping.
This information was used in a vulnerability assessment framework to assess the vulnerability of wetlands to cropping in Victoria at two spatial scales: site scale (individual wetlands) and landscape scale (regions or clusters of wetlands).
Wetland vulnerability at the site scale
Cropping in Victoria is generally a dryland activity, with broadacre production of grains such as wheat and barley, covering over 3 million hectares. These crop species are intolerant of long-term waterlogging and high salinities. Therefore, wetlands that are most likely to be exposed to cropping are frequently dry, generally shallow, and fresh to brackish. In addition, cropping does not occur on very steep or heavily forested land, so wetlands at risk identified in this study usually occur on plains areas with endorheic (internal) drainage patterns.
The factors that influence the likelihood that a farmer can and will crop a wetland include:
• the physical attributes of the wetland, e.g. wetland size (smaller wetlands are more likely to be cropped than larger wetlands) and soil constraints (the presence of heavy clay reduces the likelihood of cropping)
• the likelihood of economic gain, i.e. the potential crop yield versus the potential return on expenditure
• the risk of crop failure, e.g. frost, droughts and waterlogging risks
• legal limitations such as protection of endangered or rare species, and government legislation; and
• the farmer’s attitude towards conservation.
The overall aim of cropping practices is to produce a plant monoculture that results in a high yield of seed or grain. Broadacre cropping entails soil preparation (chemical amelioration, cultivation), sowing seed, application of biocides and fertilisers, and harvest. Each of these activities has the potential to impact on the biota and processes of wetlands.
There are multiple ecological consequences from cropping of wetlands. Cropping in wetlands has been found to reduce the germination of plants from the seed bank, and reduce the diversity of plants that establish. Invertebrate diversity and abundance can be impacted by the physical changes associated with cropping, as well as changes in hydrology that occur when wetlands are modified to enhance their value as cropland. Chemical and physical disturbances associated with cropping wetlands can modify food availability and reduce the numbers of amphibians, reptiles and mammals that use dry wetlands as a refuge. Cropped wetlands support fewer waterbirds that rely on a mosaic of wetlands for feeding and breeding.
The inherent resilience (or ‘adaptive capacity’) of temporary wetland plant and animal communities allows them to tolerate disturbance of different kinds. The seed bank, the high levels of biodiversity in the plant, plankton and invertebrate communities, as well as connectivity with other wetlands convey resilience and can ameliorate some potential impacts. Despite this, wetlands are highly vulnerable to cropping because a large number of their attributes (soil, seed bank, vegetation, invertebrates, vertebrates, water regime, water quality) and processes (germination, establishment, trophic interactions) are sensitive to the physical and chemical disturbances applied in cropping.
Therefore, although temporary wetlands are naturally resilient to disturbance, repeated and widespread cropping is likely to have a negative effect on their condition, and therefore the values and services they provide. Cropping has the capacity to remove shallow, temporary wetlands from the landscape altogether.
Wetland vulnerability at the landscape scale
At a landscape scale, wetlands are exposed to cropping in those agricultural areas of high wetland density where the topography, soil characters and rainfall are amenable to cropping. There is a low likelihood of cropping and impacts of cropping to wetlands on public land. The approximately 20,000 privately owned wetlands of natural origin are at the highest risk.
Geospatial analysis identified seven clusters of Victoria’s wetlands that could be exposed to the impacts of cropping. The incidence of cropping in the southern Victorian landscape is limited by a combination of landform and alternate agricultural enterprises. Wetland clusters at Bessiebelle and near Mt Gambier in western Victoria are currently only lightly impacted by cropping, but are potentially vulnerable to cropping in the future (with higher temperatures and more evaporation due to climate change).
Two of the wetland clusters in western Victoria (South East Grampians and West Wimmera) are currently impacted by cropping and were examined in detail to determine the scale of that impact. The results of this analysis indicate that changes in cropping practices and machinery that have occurred in the past decade (e.g. rock removal, direct-drill sowing, landscape clearance, use of airseeders with 20 m widths, sprayers with 33 m span), have increased the amount of cropping in wetlands in these regions.
A comparison of data collected for this study and data collected in c. 2010 revealed that the incidence of cropping in wetlands is now much higher than was previously recorded, with nearly 45 % of wetlands sampled in the South East Grampians cluster of wetlands impacted by cropping to some degree, compared to an estimate of 2 % in 2010. In the South East Grampians cluster cropping occurs on freshwater, rain-filled wetlands on volcanic-derived soils. There do not appear to be any substantial physical restrictions to an increase in the incidence of cropping in South East Grampians wetlands in dry years. In contrast, the percentage of wetlands cropped in the West Wimmera has remained relatively stable since 2010, at approximately 20 %. The West Wimmera cluster of wetlands occurs on a mosaic of undulating farmland and forested land, where wetlands are formed from groundwater and rainfall. Wetland cropping in the West Wimmera occurs at the edges of saline and fresh permanent wetlands, as well as in temporary wetlands. Cropping in the West Wimmera region is restricted by soil type, and the presence of trees and shrubs.
In both the East Grampians and West Wimmera regions the likelihood that a wetland will be cropped is related to:
• surrounding land use - wetlands adjacent to crop land are highly likely to be cropped
• wetland size and depth - shallow wetlands up to approximately 8 ha are more vulnerable than are larger wetlands
• wetland water regime - permanent wetlands are less likely to be fully cropped than temporary ones
• water quality - saline wetlands are not much cropped, brackish and freshwater more so
• presence of trees and shrubs across the wetland - wetlands dominated by non-woody vegetation are more likely to be cropped than those dominated by woody vegetation; and
• the conservation ethic of the land manager.
Wetlands, like all ecosystems, have some degree of adaptive capacity or resilience that allows them to withstand disturbance. One of the mechanisms that provides adaptive capacity in temporary wetlands is the connectivity among individual wetlands in a wetland mosaic. Cropping can increase fragmentation of that mosaic by reducing wetland size, removing smaller wetlands, and increasing the distances and resistance to dispersal among wetlands, thereby reducing wetland resilience at a landscape scale.
The outcomes of this review were used to briefly explore management recommendations for natural resource managers. There are three management options in relation to cropping in wetlands: do nothing, conserve what remains, or conserve and try to restore wetlands that are already impacted. Given the value of temporary wetlands in the Victorian landscape and their capacity to support high biodiversity and cultural values it is recommended that management should seek to conserve and improve the condition of the remaining unimpacted wetlands, and restore wetlands that are currently impacted where they contribute to landscape connectivity.
Actions could include:
• developing guidelines for management of unimpacted wetlands in cropping landscapes
• establishing buffers between cropping activities and wetlands
• identifying and preserving connectivity among wetlands; and
• prioritising wetlands and wetland mosaics for restoration.
There are significant barriers to the implementation of management actions. These barriers include:
• the fact that most of the wetlands are privately owned
• their dispersed nature across the landscape
• the availability of funding
• the lack of knowledge among landowners; and
• the difficulties in implementation of effective communication with landowners.
It is recommended that management actions target the economic and social drivers that make cropping in wetlands profitable and acceptable to farmers. The rapid rate of change that has been detected makes it necessary to implement conservation measures as soon as possible, before the majority of wetlands are removed from the landscape altogether, and the species dependent on them become rarer, more threatened or extinct.