... Whilst there is an overall consensus for the role of sub-continental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) as the source region of orangeites (e.g., Fraser and Hawkesworth, 1992;Tainton and McKenzie, 1994;Mitchell, 2006;Coe et al., 2008;Chalapathi Rao et al., 2011a;Giuliani et al., 2015), the depth of melting and the source region of kimberlites are unconstrained and remain controversial. Based on bulk-rock geochemistry, high-pressure experimental studies, and entrained diamond inclusions, a number of potential reservoirs have been invoked for kimberlites that range from a metasomatised (enriched) cratonic SCLM (Skinner, 1989;Tainton and McKenzie, 1994;Le Roex et al., 2003;Chalapathi Rao et al., 2004;Harris et al., 2004;Becker and Le Roex, 2006;Agashev et al., 2008;Donnelly et al., 2011;Griffin et al., 2014), solely asthenospheric (convecting) mantle (Mitchell, 1995(Mitchell, , 2006Wu et al., 2010;Tappe et al., 2012Tappe et al., , 2014, transition zone or lower mantle (Ringwood et al., 1992;Bizzarro et al., 2002;Nowell et al., 2004;Paton et al., 2009), the core-mantle boundary (Haggerty, 1999;Torsvik et al., 2010;Collerson et al., 2010) and also multiple reservoirs involving the asthenosphere and cratonic lithosphere (Tappe et al., 2011). Before constraining the genesis of the FALC kimberlites under study, it is imperative to assess the role of late-stage deuteric alteration and crustal contamination, in comparison with primitive kimberlite magma compositions that are reported. ...