Scytalopus speluncae was described from a specimen collected at São João del Rei, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The holotype is housed in St. Petersburg (Zoological Insti‑ tute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Figure 1A), and the plate accompanying the type description depicts a pale grey bird with a whitish throat ("devident blanchâtre vers le milieu de la gorge et de la poitrine"). Subsequently, Chrostowski (1921) analyzed the holotype and ampli‑ fied the type description by mentioning the presence of brown‑fringed feathers in the rump region, a feature that was thereafter confirmed by an analysis of the same speci‑ men by Raposo et al. (2006). In 1958, Helmut Sick, without having the oppor‑ tunity to analyze the holotype of Ménétriés, described Scytalopus indigoticus novacapitalis, which is nowadays considered a separate species (Krabble and Schulenberg, 2003) and is part of the S. speluncae complex. Sick (1958, 1960) admitted doubts as to which species to assign his new taxon. S. novacapitalis is light grey with brown‑ fringed feathers in the rump and flanks, being, in fact, morphologically almost identical to S. speluncae, accord‑ ing to the posterior analysis of Raposo et al. (2006, based on holotype and topotypes). But, at the time, Sick was able to compare S. novacapitalis only with the White‑ breasted Tapaculo S. indigoticus and with the dark gray Mouse‑colored Tapaculo of the Brazilian coastal ranges (the Serra do Mar), referred by him, and most other au‑ thors, to Scytalopus speluncae but since described as a dis‑ tinct species, Scytalopus notorius Raposo et al. 2006. In addition to being uniform dark grey, S. notorius lacks any trace of brown in the rump and flanks in adult males. At the time (1958), no topotype of S. speluncae was available to Sick, nor was such material in existence two years later when he prepared a second publication review‑ ing Brazilian Rhinocryptidae (Sick 1960), in which he elevated S. i. novacapitalis to specific status for the follow‑ ing reasons: morphology close to indigoticus (much less to speluncae, though with some elements of intermediacy), but nevertheless with important differences (some of which, such as the slightly shorter bill and shorter rump The genus Scytalopus Gould, 1837 (Rhinocrypti‑ dae), which as currently recognized comprises c.40 spe‑ cies (Krabbe and Schulenberg 2003, Cuervo et al. 2005, Krabbe et al. 2005, Raposo et al. 2006), is one of the most confusing amongst Neotropical suboscines, as it presents a strong tendency to respond morphologically and vocally to geographical barriers. Nevertheless, these morphological and vocal responses are usually very subtle, making attempts to understand the evolution of different populations, as well as their taxonomy, highly complicat‑ ed. To understand such a complex genus, strong method‑ ological and conceptual parameters are required from the phenomenological point of view (species concept, careful study of geographical variation etc.), as well as from a no‑ menclatural perspective, following a strict interpretation of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999). This commentary focuses on some recently de‑ scribed species that comprise the species complex Scy-talopus speluncae (Ménétriés, 1835) (Given that several alternative spellings exist in the ornithological literature for Ménétriés, namely the present spelling, as well as Ménétries and even Ménétriès, and that we have already been 'accused' once, by Bornschein et al. 2007, of mis‑ spelling his name, we take the opportunity to record that the international library standard spelling is Ménétriés, as followed here and our earlier publication, Raposo et al. 2006.). In writing a single commentary, we are motivated by the fact that virtually all of these descriptions share the same weakness, namely that they have singularly failed to compare their purported new taxa with the holotype that bears the senior name of the complex. Despite this, our commentary does not deal with the validity of those species per se; thus we do not seek to discuss the relative importance of the vocal, morphological and molecular characters used to support the erection of these new taxa. Instead, we seek to demonstrate that the lack of compari‑ son with the relevant holotype has led to serious problems in the nomenclatural basis underlying the diagnoses of three new species belonging to the speluncae complex. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 16(1):78-81 março de 2008 COMENTÁRIO