The paper is essentially in three parts. (A) First it outlines and documents the labour market framework in TRYM and attempts to validate the framework by showing how it can explain certain historical facts such as why unemployment is now much more cyclical than in the 1960s. To further validate the framework, it is compared and reconciled with the labour market specifications in a recent paper by the RBA (Debelle and Vickery 1998). (B) The paper then turns to some of the implications of the framework and what it says about the linkages between wages and unemployment. An important aspect of how a wage change impacts on unemployment under our current monetary policy framework is via the interest rate reaction to the inflation generated by higher nominal wages. The paper therefore compares the monetary policy response in TRYM with that in other Australian macro models. It then looks at the full model response to a wage shock and demonstrates that the interest rate reaction is important in generating the short-term employment response. (C) The paper then looks at the macroeconomic consequences of reducing unemployment, including implications for living standards and macroeconomic aggregates such as national saving and investment. Inter alia the paper touches on what the model has to say about the sources of the increase in unemployment in the 1980s and 1990s. While it is impossible to be precise, the evidence from the model suggests that the observed increase in structural unemployment was only partly due to search effectiveness factors. It seems macroeconomic wage setting and price setting factors (eg institutional/bargaining factors, the fall in productivity growth, decline in the terms of trade, and perverse feedback such as to taxation and to the cyclicality of unemployment itself) played an important role in explaining the level and persistence of unemployment in the late 1980s early 1990s.