Content uploaded by Richard Lund
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Richard Lund on Feb 09, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
On a Dentition of Polyrhizodus (Chondrichthyes, Petalodontiformes) from the Namurian Bear
Gulch Limestone of Montana
Author(s): Richard Lund
Reviewed work(s):
Source:
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology,
Vol. 3, No. 1 (Mar., 1983), pp. 1-6
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4522922 .
Accessed: 23/01/2013 10:22
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
.
The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology and Taylor & Francis, Ltd. are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:22:45 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
W
Y T
X3
Z
FIGURE 3. Polyrhizodus
digitatus
Leidy, MV6167, teeth T-Z in labial view. Scale in cm.
was observed (Herold, 1975), and a distinct
dentinoenameloid junction is present (Fig. 4). Ortho-
dentine is absent, as noted by Radinsky (1961).
The histology of the teeth of Polyrhizodus differs
from that of Petalodus in several particulars. Principal
vascular canals of the core of the crown become limited
to two vertical rows toward the apex, on each side of
and parallel to the cutting edge (Figs. 2, 5-7). The outer
zone of peripheral vascular canals and the depth of the
interdigitating enameloid also thicken dramatically, and
fiber bundles can be seen to extend across the apex of
the crown from one parallel-fibered layer to the other.
A central region (or core) of the apex extends down-
ward and can be seen to have a vertical columnar
structure, the details of which cannot presently be re-
solved. As in Polyrhizodus, however, orthodentine is
absent.
DISCUSSION
The groups of nominal Polyrhizodus species from
Britain and North America seem to differ in one re-
spect, the number of finger-like roots present. The Brit-
ish species are described and illustrated (Davis, 1883)
as varying between 11 and 22 roots, while no described
North American specimen exceeds 11 roots. Among
the nineteen nominal species listed by Hay (1901), all
but P. carbonarius St. John and Worthen (1875) are
Lower Carboniferous and have some distinct asym-
metry. Three species, P. dentatus, P. piasaensis and P.
ponticulus, are not Polyrhizodus but are allied to species
included in Chomatodus by Newberry and Worthen
(1870), while P. truncatus Newberry and Worthen,
1870, lacking divided roots, is a member of the genus
Antliodus (Hansen, written communication). The re-
maining taxa fall roughly into two groups based on
relative proportions of crown height to length. Poly-
rhizodus digitatus Leidy, 1857, as well as a series of
subsequently named teeth listed below, all conform to
the shape and proportions of the teeth in the Bear
Gulch specimen.
Polyrhizodus digitatus Leidy, 1857--Synonyms: P.
princeps Newberry and Worthen, 1866; P. lobatus
Newberry and Worthen, 1866; P. littoni Newberry and
Worthen, 1870; P. amplus St. John and Worthen, 1875;
P. williamsi St. John and Worthen, 1875; P. excavatus
St. John and Worthen, 1875.
Polyrhizodus porosus and the other North American
nominal species have a considerably higher crown in
proportion to the length than does P. digitatus. The
significance of this feature is unknown in the absence
of any information on the opposing dentition of P.
digitatus.
The current specimen provides no evidence of an
association of tooth shapes between Polyrhizodus and
Chomatodus, as suggested by Jaekel (1899). A rela-
tively close relationship between Polyrhizodus, Peta-
lodus and Antliodus is suggested on the basis of tooth
shapes and proportions (Newberry and Worthen, 1866,
1870; Davis, 1883), and it may be suggested that het-
erodonty is probably not present in any of these genera
(Hansen, 1968, on Petalodus). Polyrhizodus has a con-
siderably more primitive tooth histology than does
Petalodus, however. The thickened apical enameloid
and the high relief on the dentinoenameloid junction
may both be considered to confer mechanical stability
of an extreme degree to the teeth of Petalodus (Herold,
1975). This would imply specialization for durophagy
in Petalodus that is not seen in Polyrhizodus. The his-
tology of Antliodus is not known to me.
The absence of orthodentine in these petalodont teeth
contrasts strongly with the condition in all known cla-
dodont, xenacanth, and hybodont (Johnson, 1981)
teeth. Petalodont teeth also contrast with known holo-
cephalians and cochliodonts, which lack enameloid
as well as orthodentine (Radinsky, 1961; Patterson,
1965). The histology of the symphysial teeth of Edestus
(Taylor and Adamec, 1977) is quite similar in the pres-
4 JVP 3(1), March
1983
This content downloaded on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:22:45 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
.-~~~~ . .xL
Sii
I~~~ ~
,
:J•"
/~~ j. .-
...,
FIGURE
4. Polyrhizodus digitatus
Leidy,
MV6167, transverse section of the apex
of tooth Y1 between crossed
polars.
Lingual
surface
to right.
DEJ, dentinoenameloid
junction. Scale equals 1 mm.
FIGURES 5-7. Petalodus ohioensis, CM41065, Conemaugh
Group, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
5, Apex of tooth,
transverse
section. 6, Same in polarized
light, negative reversed. Scale in mm. 7, Apex of tooth, tangential
section, crossed
polars
with gypsum
plate;
lingual
surface to left. Scale equals 1 mm.
ence of enameloid and absence of orthodentine, al-
though the structure of the osteodentine of Edestus is
considerably more varied. The histology of the peta-
lodontid teeth thus adds one more item of evidence to
indicate a relationship with edestoids (and orodon-
toids). This relationship was originally formalized with
the erection of the taxon Bradyodonti (Woodward,
1921; Lund, 1977).
There is no heterodonty in Polyrhizodus, and no
striking evidence, aside from hypothetical transfor-
mation series, of any close relationship between the
Petalodontidae and either Climaxodus or Chomato-
dus. It is thus not possible to confirm the monophyly
of the Petalodontiformes on the basis of the present
evidence.
Acknowledgements-I thank Wendy Lund for tech-
nical support. National Science Foundation grants DEB
77-02548 and DEB 79-19492 supported the research.
REFERENCES
Davis, J. W. 1883. On the fossil fishes of the Carboniferous
Limestone series of Great Britain. Scientific Transac-
tions of the Royal Dublin Society (2)25:327-600.
JVP 3(1), March 1983 5
This content downloaded on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:22:45 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Hansen, M. C. 1968. The Upper Paleozoic genus Petalodus
(Bradyodonti) from North America. Proceedings of the
Nebraska Academy of Sciences, April 26-27; abstract.
Hay, O. P. 1901. Bibliography and Catalogue of the Fossil
Vertebrata of North America. Bulletin of the United
States Geological Survey 179:868 pp.
Herold, R. C. B. 1975. Scanning electron microscopy of
enameloid and dentine in fish teeth. Archives of Oral
Biology 20:635-640.
Jaekel, 0. 1899. Ueber die Organization der Petalodonten.
Zeitschrift der Deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft 51:
258-297; Berlin.
Johnson, G. D. 1981. Hybodontidae (Chondrichthyes) from
the Wichita-Albany Group (Early Permian) of Texas.
Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 1(1):
1-41.
Kerebel, B., Le Cabellec, M. T., Daculsi, G. and Kerebel,
L. M. 1978. Osteodentine and vascular osteodentine
of Anarhichas lupus (L.). Cell and Tissue Research 187:
135-146.
Leidy, J. 1857. Descriptions of the remains of fishes from
the Carboniferous Limestone of Illinois and Missouri.
Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 11:
87-90.
Lund, R. 1977. New information on the evolution of the
bradyodont Chondrichthyes. Fieldiana: Geology 33(28):
521-539.
1977. A new petalodont (Chondrichthyes, Brad-
yodonti) from the Upper Mississippian of Montana. An-
nals of Carnegie Museum 46(10): 129-155.
Malzahn, E. 1968. Uber neue Funde von Janassa bitu-
minosa (Schloth.) im nieder rheinischen Zechstein. Geo-
logisches Jahrbuch 85:67-96; Hannover.
Newberry, J. S. 1897. New species and a new genus of
American Paleozoic Fishes, together with notes on the
genera Oracanthus, Dactylodus, Polyrhizodus, Sanda-
lodus, Deltodus. Transactions of the New York Academy
of Sciences 16:282-303 + 3 pls.
- and Worthen, A. H. 1866. Descriptions of new
species of vertebrates, mainly from the Subcarbonifer-
ous Limestone and Coal Measures of Illinois. Geological
Survey of Illinois 2:9-131.
I
and 1870. Descriptions of fossil verte-
brates. Geological Survey of Illinois 4:347-374.
Orvig, T. 1966. Histologic studies of ostracoderms, plac-
oderms and fossil elasmobranchs. 2. On the dermal skel-
eton of two late Paleozoic elasmobranchs. Arkiv fdr
Zoologi 19:1-30 + 5 pls.
1967. Phylogeny of tooth tissues: Evolution of
some calcified tissues in early vertebrates. In Miles, A.
E. W. (ed.), Structural and Chemical Organization of
Teeth, Vol. 1:45-110. Academic Press, London.
Patterson, C. 1965. The phylogeny of the chimaeroids.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of Lon-
don (B) 249(757):101-219.
Radinsky, L. 1961. Tooth histology as a taxonomic crite-
rion for cartilaginous fishes. Journal of Morphology
109(1):73-92.
Reif, W. E. 1973. Morphologie und Ultrastruktur des Hai
"Schmelzes". Zoologica Scripta 2:231-250.
Shellis, R. P. and Berkovitz, B. K. B. 1980. Dentine struc-
ture in the rostral teeth of the sawfish Pristis (Elasmo-
branchii). Archives of Oral Biology 25:339-343.
St. John, O. H. and Worthen, A. H. 1875. Descriptions of
fossil fishes. Geological Survey of Illinois 6:245-488.
Taylor, K. and Adamec, T. 1977. Tooth histology and ul-
trastucture of a Paleozoic shark, Edestus heinrichii.
Fieldiana: Geology 33:441-470.
Woodward, A. S. 1921. Observations on some extinct elas-
mobranch fishes. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of
London, Sess. 133, pp. 29-39.
1889. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British
Museum. Part. I. Elasmobranchii. Taylor & Francis,
London, 474 pp.
6 JVP 3(1). March 1983
This content downloaded on Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:22:45 AM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions