Content uploaded by Justin Davies
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Justin Davies on Jan 23, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
28. Wauthy P, Pagnamenta A, Vassalli F, Naeije R, Brimioulle S. Right ventricular adapta-
tion to pulmonary hypertension: an interspecies comparison. Am J Physiol Heart Circ
Physiol 2004;286:H1441 –7.
29. Caudron J, FaresJ, Vivier PH, LefebvreV, Petitjean C, Dacher JN. Diagnostic accuracy
and variability of three semi-quantitative methods for assessing right ventricular sys-
tolic function from cardiac MRI in patients with acquired heart disease. Eur Radiol
2011;21:2111– 20.
30. Mauritz GJ, Kind T, MarcusJT, Bogaard HJ, van de Veerdonk M, Postmus PE et al. Pro-
gressive changes in right ventricular geometric shortening and long-term survival in
pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2012;141:935– 43.
31. Giusca S, Jurcut R, Coman IM, Ghiorghiu I, Catrina D, Popescu BA et al.
Right ventricular function predicts clinical response to specific vasodilator
therapy in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiography 2013;30:
17–26.
32. Tamborini G, Muratori M, Brusoni D, Celeste F, Maffessanti F, Caiani EG et al. Is
right ventricular systolic function reduced after cardiac surgery? A two- and
three-dimensional echocardiographic study. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009;10:
630–4.
33. Gleason WL, Braunwald E. Studies on the first derivative of the ventricular pressure
pulse in man. J Clin Invest 1962;42:80 – 91.
IMAGE FOCUS
.............................................................................................................................................................................
doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet137
Online publish-ahead-of-print 24 July 2013
Bioabsorbable scaffold optimization in provisional stenting: insight from
optical coherence tomography
Nicolas Foin
1
, Matteo Ghione
2
, Alessio Mattesini
2
, Justin E. Davies
1
, and Carlo Di Mario
2
*
1
International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College London, London, UK and
2
NIHR Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
* Corresponding author: Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK. Tel: +44 (0)207 3518616; fax: +44 (0)207 3518104, Email: c.dimario@rbht.nhs.uk
Since the emergence of biabsorbable vascular
scaffolds (BVS), treatment of bifurcation lesions
with these devices has remained a source of ques-
tion. Although SB dilatation has been previously
performed with BVS, it is not yet clear how
dilatation across BVS strut may impact scaffold
structure.
A 74-year-old lady with hypercholesterolaemia
and type 2 diabetes was admitted to our centre
due to non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.
Patient underwent percutaneous coronary inter-
vention and an everolimus 3.0 × 28 mm BVS
(Absorb BVS, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA,
USA) was implanted in the left anterior descend-
ing artery at the level of the well developed
second diagonal branch with a moderate lesion
involving the first diagonal branch. The scaffold
was post-dilated to 3.5 mm proximally and
dilated through the origin of the side branch with
a 2.0-mm semi-compliant balloon, slowly inflated
at 12 ATM.
Final angiogram showed satisfactory results with TIMI 3 flow in the both branches. Frequency domain optical coherence tomography
(FD-OCT) pullback was performed on the implanted scaffold (C7 System, St Jude Medical, St Paul, USA). Longitudinal view and cross-
sections (Panel A, 1–4) demonstrate the good side branch access after dilatation of side-branch ostium through the scaffold strut. Three-
dimensional OCT reconstruction of the main vessel reveals mild distortions of the scaffold observed distally at the level of the carina
(arrow) (Panels B and C ).
Despite the distortions of the scaffold strut observed distally on the three-dimensional reconstructions (arrow), all struts remained well
apposed to the vessel (Panel A, 2).
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. & The Author 2013. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Insights from a porcine model of chronic pressure overload 1149
by guest on January 23, 2015Downloaded from