Natural resource managers are increasingly being asked to consider values outside their fields. This is especially evident with regards to wildlife habitat changes caused by forest management activities. Forest managers are being asked to balance both wildlife habitat and forest product outputs from the forest. Our approach of implementing a Habitat Evaluation Procedure as a module of the Landscape Management System is an example of how forest growth and yield models can be integrated with existing wildlife models to expand the forest manager's tool set. The Landscape Management System uses the Forest Vegetation Simulator to simulate forest growth and changes caused by silvicultural activities on the Satsop Forest ownership, located in southwestern Washington State. The Habitat Evaluation Procedure module then calculates Habitat Suitability Indexes and Habitat Units for Cooper's hawk (Accipiter Cooperii), pileated woodpecker (Drycopus pileatus), southern red- backed vole (Clethrionomys gapperi), and spotted towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus) from the resulting projected forest inventories. The result is a tool that allows forest managers to assess changes in wildlife habitat caused by potential forest management at the stand and ownership levels. Because the Landscape Management System produces summaries of a variety of forest outputs, both tabular and visual, the results can then be used in analyses of existing and proposed forest management plans. On a stand-by-stand basis, multiple silvicultural pathways can be tested to assess which pathways meet varying desired habitat and forest product outputs. Through the use of stand and ownership level simulations and analyses of multiple target outputs, forest managers and decisionmakers are able to better understand output tradeoffs at the landscape and watershed levels. The public has become increasingly concerned over the past three decades about potential negative effects on wild- life caused by development and other modifications of wild- life habitat. Conversion of naturally regenerated forests to intensively managed plantations for timber production has raised concerns about habitat for species that are associated with these forest structures at the present time and in the future. While planning current and future forest manage- ment activities, forest managers are being asked to address how management will affect forest systems in the coming decades. As concern grows and more species are studied, many of these species become candidates for special consideration ranging from a "species of concern" at the State level, such as the pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus) in Wash- ington State, to "threatened" or "endangered," such as the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) in the Pacific Northwest, the red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) in the Southeast, and the Kirtland's warbler (Dendroica kirtlandii) in the Lake States region, at both the State and Federal levels. Listing of these species resulted in regulatory constraints on forest management. Changes in Federal forest management in the Pacific Northwest under the Northwest Forest Plan to protect old forest habitat and the spotted owl exemplify the regulatory constraints. Har- vest on Pacific Northwest National Forests has virtually stopped. Technology has increased greatly during this time as well. Computing power has greatly increased, and forest growth and yield models, such as the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS), have been developed to predict forest growth and development though time. Using these tools, forest manag- ers can estimate potential harvest volumes and tree sizes in the future. From initial forest inventory data and simulated future data, managers create forest management plans based on criteria such as allowable harvest volume or stand structures, now and in the future, calculated from stand attributes such as tree species, sizes, and volumes. As demands on forests change, managers must estimate effects on other forest outputs such as wildlife habitat. Using a simulation system that includes wildlife habitat models, it may be possible for managers and other interested parties to gain insight into how current forest management may affect future forest outputs and ensure forests are managed in a sustainable manner. This study implements a Habitat Evaluation Procedure (HEP; USDI 1980a) within the Landscape Management System (LMS) for two reasons: first, to develop tools to support analysis of new management alternatives for Satsop Forest. Any analysis must be consistent with the original Satsop Forest HEP (Curt Leigh personal communication) to ensure comparable results. The original Satsop Forest HEP was performed on Satsop Forest, formerly the Satsop Nuclear Site, to assess losses of wildlife habitats caused by construc- tion of two nuclear power plants and to analyze management plans to mitigate for lost habitats. Second, because Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) models and the HEP use, primarily, tree-based measures, the HEP is used in this study to demonstrate linking wildlife habitat models with forest growth models within a forest simulation system.