ArticlePDF Available

The flower fly genus Citrogramma Vockeroth (Diptera: Syrphidae): Illustrated revision with descriptions of new species

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The flower fly genus Citrogramma is revised here. Seventeen new species are described; four lectotypes and one neotype are designated; two species are transferred from Xanthogramma to Citrogramma; and another Xanthogramma species, Xanthogramma fasciatum, is synonymized under Citrogramma clarum. Xanthogramma indica and Xanthogramma pruthii are considered junior synonyms of Scaeva latimaculata. Redescriptions, illustrations, synonymies, diagnoses, and distributional data are given for all species of Citrogramma recognized here, and an identification key is also provided. New specimens and species from New Caledonia, Taiwan, Nepal, and China expand the geographical range of the genus. The large number of new species proposed in this paper highlights the prevailing incomplete knowledge of this genus. New Guinea has the highest diversity of known Citrogramma species. © 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The flower fly genus Citrogramma Vockeroth (Diptera:
Syrphidae): illustrated revision with descriptions of
new species
XIMO MENGUAL*
Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box
37012, MRC-0169. Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA
Received 3 September 2010; revised 10 March 2011; accepted for publication 14 March 2011
The flower fly genus Citrogramma is revised here. Seventeen new species are described; four lectotypes and one
neotype are designated; two species are transferred from Xanthogramma to Citrogramma; and another Xantho-
gramma species, Xanthogramma fasciatum, is synonymized under Citrogramma clarum.Xanthogramma indica
and Xanthogramma pruthii are considered junior synonyms of Scaeva latimaculata. Redescriptions, illustrations,
synonymies, diagnoses, and distributional data are given for all species of Citrogramma recognized here, and an
identification key is also provided. New specimens and species from New Caledonia, Taiwan, Nepal, and China
expand the geographical range of the genus. The large number of new species proposed in this paper highlights
the prevailing incomplete knowledge of this genus. New Guinea has the highest diversity of known Citrogramma
species.
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172.
doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00750.x
ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: Australian Region – identification key – Oriental Region – synonym.
INTRODUCTION
Citrogramma Vockeroth, 1969, flower flies (Diptera:
Syrphidae), are found in the Australasian and Orien-
tal Regions, but often misidentified and confused with
other syrphine genera. Known from Nepal and India,
the genus ranges eastwards to the Solomon Islands
and New Caledonia, and south to the Brisbane and
Sydney environs in Australia. Relationships with
other genera are not well studied. Citrogramma is
currently placed within the tribe Syrphini of the
subfamily Syrphinae and bears a strong superficial
resemblance to Xanthogramma Schiner, 1860, but the
analyses by Mengual et al. (2009) found this genus to
be closer to Allograpta Osten Sacken, 1875.
Vockeroth (1969) described Citrogramma based on
Syrphus hervebazini Curran, 1928. As mentioned in
his revision of Syrphini genera, there were some
genera accepted by most authors with different limits,
but there was a tendency to divide the tribe Syrphini
in two major groups: the Syrphus group, with the
scutum entirely dark or indistinctly paler laterally,
and the Xanthogramma group, including species with
a well-defined, bright yellow lateral mesonotal
margin. Earlier authors, however, included in the
Syrphus group many species with a yellow mesonotal
margin, which other authors referred to Xantho-
gramma, e.g. Curran (1928, 1931a, b). Citrogramma
belongs to the Xanthogramma group, although many
species were originally described as Syrphus Fabri-
cius, 1775.
de Meijere (1907–1924) studied Diptera collected
from South-East Asia in a series of 16 papers.
Amongst these papers, he described three species of
Syrphus:Syrphus circumdatus,Syrphus luteifrons,
and Syrphus gedehanus:S. circumdatus and S. lutei-
frons were described from Moroka (de Meijere, 1908),
a locality in New Guinea (Papua New Guinea); S. cir-
cumdatus was based on a series of three males and
two females, but S. luteifrons only on a single male.
Later, de Meijere (1914) described Syrphus gedehanus
from Gunung Gedeh, Java (Indonesia), based on a
*E-mail: xmengual@gmail.com
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172. With 157 figures
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172 99
series of male and female specimens. After
Vockeroth’s (1969) revision, Knutson, Thompson &
Vockeroth (1975) transferred S. circumdatus and
S. gedehanus to Citrogramma. More recently, Thomp-
son & Vockeroth (1989) also placed S. luteifrons in
this genus.
Hervé-Bazin (1923a) described a new species,
Olbiosyrphus clarus, from material collected in Laos,
northern Vietnam, and Java by M. R. Vitalis de
Salvaza. Olbiosyrphus Mik, 1897 is now treated as a
synonym of Xanthogramma. Then, in his ‘Fauna
Entomologique de l’Indo-Chine Française’, Hervé-
Bazin (1926) expanded his original description with
figures and provided more details. In both publica-
tions, Hervé-Bazin related his new species to S. lutei-
frons,S. circumdatus, and S. gedehanus. Later,
Curran (1931b) transferred Olbiosyrphus clarus to
Syrphus. More recently, Vockeroth (1969) placed this
species in Citrogramma.
Brunetti (1923) described Xanthogramma citrinum
from Indian material (three males and two females)
and mentioned another male, in the Indian Museum,
that might possibly represent a different species based
on some morphological differences. Hervé-Bazin
(1923b) transferred X. citrinum to Olbiosyrphus,
explaining the differences between the two genera.
Curran (1928), in his revision of flower flies from the
Malay Peninsula, transferred this species to the genus
Syrphus Fabricius. Finally, Vockeroth (1969) placed
this species in his new genus Citrogramma.
Curran studied the Syrphidae of the Malay Penin-
sula and North Borneo held then in the collection of
the Federated Malay States Museums in a series of
articles (Curran, 1928, 1931a, b, 1942). In these revi-
sions he described many Syrphus species, of which
Vockeroth (1969) placed in Citrogramma the species
Syrphus difficilis Curran, 1928, Syrphus hervebazini
Curran, 1928, and Syrphus variscutatus Curran,
1928. In his papers, Curran also described other taxa
that Knutson et al. (1975) considered Citrogramma
species: Syrphus pendleburyi Curran, 1928 and
Syrphus fascipleura Curran, 1931.
After a very productive decade with a number of
publications (the 1920s), the study of Oriental flower
flies remained latent until the landmark world revi-
sion of the tribe Syrphini by Vockeroth (1969). Citro-
gramma species were mentioned in print only a few
times as Olbiosyrphus (in Frey, 1946) or Xantho-
gramma (in Keiser, 1958). In his generic revision,
Vockeroth (1969: 92–100) described Citrogramma,
transferred five known species to his new genus, and
described four new species. He admitted having
serious doubts of including his new species and the
previous ones in the same genus because of the great
dissimilarity in their male genitalia; ‘the greatest
interspecific variation in male genitalia for a Syrphini
genus’ in his opinion. He even considered referring
each species with different genitalia to a separate
genus, but finally decided to include all of them in
Citrogramma based on similar colour patterns of
thorax and abdomen, and particularly the metallic
bluish submedian stripes on the brownish pollinosity
of the scutum. He described three new species from
Papua New Guinea (Citrogramma bicornutum,Citro-
gramma quadricornutum, and Citrogramma sed-
lacekorum), each of them with very peculiar male
genitalia, and Citrogramma notiale, the first species
from Australia.
After this Syrphini revision, the name Citro-
gramma did not appear again until the regional
Diptera Catalogues appeared in print. Knutson et al.
(1975) placed in Citrogramma a total of nine Oriental
species, including four new synonyms as mentioned
above. Years later, in the ‘Catalogue of the Diptera of
Australasian and Oceanian regions’, Thompson &
Vockeroth (1989) included in Citrogramma five
species occurring in Papua New Guinea and one Aus-
tralian species.
More recently, Wyatt (1991) described five new
species of Citrogramma in his study of material
present in the collections of The Natural History
Museum (London, UK). He included notes and com-
ments on previously described species and provided
figures for scutal and pleural patterns and illustrated
different facial profiles. Citrogramma citrinoides
Wyatt, 1991 (a species similar to Citrogramma citri-
num) was described based on material from Malaysia,
as well as Citrogramma vockerothi Wyatt, 1991, which
also included material from Java in the type series.
From India, Wyatt (1991) described Citrogramma fla-
vigenum based on a single male, but he also described
a new species from Papua New Guinea, Citrogramma
robertsi Wyatt, 1991, this based on a single female. In
his work, Wyatt also described the first species from
the Solomon Islands, Citrogramma solomonense
Wyatt, 1991, only known from male specimens.
Wyatt (1991) also mentioned four more species not
formally described or named from the Oriental Region
(sp. A, sp. B, sp. C, and sp. D). Citrogramma sp. A was
a female from India for which a full description was
being prepared by Ghorpadé (1994). Ghorpadé (1994)
named this species Citrogramma chola.Citrogramma
sp. B, Wyatt’s second insufficiently described species,
is similar to Citrogramma clarum (see below). A third
species was also mentioned as Citrogramma sp. C,
which Ghorpadé was also working on. This species
was properly named by Ghorpadé (1994) as Citro-
gramma henryi and it is only known from Sri Lanka.
The fourth species, Citrogramma sp. D, was based on
a fairly distinct single female from Thailand, which is
named Citrogramma currani Ghorpadé sp. nov. in the
present revision.
100 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
The latest work in which new species of Citro-
gramma were described was by Ghorpadé (1994).
In his diagnostic keys to Syrphini from the Indian
subcontinent, Ghorpadé described two new species:
C. henryi and C. chola.Citrogramma henryi was
described from Sri Lanka, as already mentioned, and
C. chola was based on material from three southern
Indian states.
The aim of this revision is to describe the several
new Citrogramma species discovered, as well as to
indicate new synonyms and to provide a diagnostic
key for all known species. This work started with the
casual discovery of a male in the collection of the
National Museum of Natural History (USNM, Wash-
ington DC, USA), that I could not identify and prop-
erly place to genus at the beginning of my research.
This specimen was the male of C. robertsi Wyatt,
1991, a species based only on a single female. F. C.
Thompson started to study this genus more than 30
years ago. I followed him and after this identification,
I began to request identified material as well as
unidentified specimens that finally resulted in the
world revision of this genus that is presented here.
Seventeen new species are described (three species
are credited to Thompson who discovered them years
ago, one is credited to Ghorpadé who discovered it
independently, and another is described by Mengual
& Ghorpadé). The total number of Citrogramma
species now goes up to 41, with three other taxa not
formally described or named here for lack of proper
type material. A male (C. robertsi) and four females
(C. clarum,Citrogramma fascipleurum,C. luteifrons,
and C. solomonense) are sexes reported for first time
and described for these known species. One new
synonym is established (Xanthogramma fasciatum
Shiraki, 1930 =Citrogramma clarum) and two other
species transferred to Citrogramma:Xanthogramma
arisanicum Shiraki, 1930 and Xanthogramma fumi-
penne Matsumura, 1916. In this revision, lectotype
specimens for Citrogramma arisanicum,Citro-
gramma circumdatum,Citrogramma clarum, and
Citrogramma gedehanum are designated, as well as a
neotype specimen for C. luteifrons. In addition, Xan-
thogramma indica Nayar, 1968 and Xanthogramma
pruthii Deoras, 1942 are considered junior synonyms
of Scaeva latimaculata (Brunetti, 1923).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Complete synonymy, literature citations, and known
distributions are given for all species, as well as
redescriptions of some poorly described species and
full descriptions of new species. Illustrations of male
genitalia are also included if diagnostic and images of
the abdominal patterns are given for all species. Ter-
minology follows Thompson (1999a). The format and
abbreviations in the generic synonymy follow Thomp-
son (1999b, 2010). A term is used here for the first
time in Syrphidae, the supra-alar area (see Fig. 1).
The supra-alar area is the lateral margin of the
scutum immediately above the attachment of the
wing (McAlpine, 1981; Cumming & Wood, 2009).
Neither Speight (1987) nor Thompson (1999a) had
named this part of the scutum.
The acronyms used for collections likewise follow
the Evenhuis (2009) standards and their equivalents
are given in the Acknowledgements. The museum or
collection holdings appear in square brackets after
each specimen. Type localities and holotype holding
institutions are specified for each species. When no
geographical coordinates for type localities were pro-
vided on original labels, Google Earth software was
used to give an approximation. In the Material
examined section, studied specimens are grouped
by localities and country, and the use of ellipses
follows Standard English practice, merely indicating
that the missing information is the same as that in
the preceding record. For type specimens, identifi-
cation labels are indicated with quotation marks
(‘ ’), each line on the label separated by a forward
slash (/). Handwritten information on labels is indi-
cated in italics, and information difficult to read or
identify (unknown localities, names, or regions) is
indicated by placement between asterisks (* *). All
studied specimens are listed, otherwise it is explic-
itly noted.
All measurements are in millimetres and were
taken using a reticule in a Wild M5A microscope.
Illustrations of male genitalia were drawn using a
camera lucida mounted on an Olympus BX51 com-
pound microscope with the help of a Nikon SMZ1500
microscope. Manual drawings were redrawn as a vec-
torial image using Adobe Illustrator (version CS3).
Illustrations of male and female abdomens were com-
posed using CombineZP software based on images of
pinned specimens taken with a Canon EOS 40D
mounted on a Microptics Camlift and the help of
Adobe Lightroom (version 1.40).
GENUS CITROGRAMMA VOCKEROTH, 1969
Type species: Syrphus hervebazini Curran, 1928 by
original designation.
Vockeroth, 1969: 92, map 14, figs 7, 16, 56, 57, 58,
93, 94, 95. Knutson et al., 1975: 311; Kapoor, Malla &
Rajbhandari, 1979: 52; Datta & Chakraborti, 1985:
240; Thompson & Vockeroth, 1989: 442; Wyatt, 1991:
155–169, figs 1–16; Sun 1992: 1106; Ghorpadé 1994:
5; Yang, Huang & Cheng, 1998: 136; Rojo et al., 2003:
42; Ohara, 2004: 830; Mitra, Mukherjee & Banerjee,
2008: 3; Mengual et al., 2009: 7, 8, 21; Mengual &
Ghorpadé, 2010: 44, 45, figs 1, 2.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 101
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Olbiosyrphus of Hervé-Bazin, 1923a, b, 1926; Frey,
1946.
Syrphus of de Meijere, 1908 (in part), 1914 (in
part); Hervé-Bazin, 1923a; Curran, 1928 (in part),
1931a (in part), 1931b (in part), 1942 (in part);
Shiraki, 1930.
Xanthogramma of Matsumura, 1916 (in part); Bru-
netti, 1923; Shiraki, 1930 (in part); Hull, 1949; Keiser,
1958; Nayar & Nayar, 1965; Biswas, Lahiri & Ghosh,
1975; Knutson et al., 1975 (in part).
Description (adapted from Vockeroth, 1969: 92)
Rather small to large, slender to robust species.
Head: Face with tubercle, gradually sloping dorsally,
more abrupt ventrally, pilose; mouthparts normal; eye
bare; male holoptic; antenna short, shorter than face;
basoflagellomere short, roundish to oval; ocellar tri-
angle equilateral; occiput densely pilose.
Thorax: Scutum with broad, complete bright yellow
lateral margin; disc black with fine brownish/bluish
subshining pollinosity, sometimes also with shining
bluish medial and/or submedial vittae or (perhaps only
in slightly wetted specimens) entirely opaque black.
Postpronotum bare. Scutellum simple with dark sub-
scutellar fringe. Metasternum pilose with some long
hairs, bare only in C. quadricornutum Vockeroth,
1969. Wing: usually entirely microtrichose, partly bare
basally in some species; vein R4+5straight, without
appendix; crossvein r-m basal; vein M1sinuate, pro-
cessive; vein M2present, short. Alula normal, broad,
microtrichose. Legs: normal, not modified.
Abdomen: Usually elongate oval, parallel-sided;
slightly margined from middle of tergum 2 to end of
tergum 5, but sometimes with margin greatly
reduced, e.g. in C. quadricornutum present only on
tergum 5; terga 3 and 4 with an entire sub-basal
yellow fascia. Male genitalia. Very variable.
Etymology
Citrogramma is derived from the neuter adjective
citro, from the Greek (kitrion, kitron), meaning
‘citron-yellow, of citron’ (Brown, 1956: 206), and the
neuter noun gramma, from the Greek (gramma, -tos),
meaning ‘mark, written character, line’ (Brown, 1956:
378). Thus, Citrogramma refers to the lateral yellow
vitta of the scutum present in all species of the genus.
Vockeroth (1969) did not indicate the gender of
Citrogramma, but he used a neuter form for the
species epithet of his new species, e.g. bicornutum,
notiale,quadricornutum, and sedlacekorum. Vocker-
oth also changed the species epithet of the previously
Figure 1. Thorax and base of abdomen, parts, lateral view. 1, anterior anepistemum; 2, posterior anepistemum; 3,
anterior anepimeron; 4, dorsomedial anepimeron; 5, posterior anepimeron; 6, katepimeron; 7, area where the posterior
spiracular fringe is found; 1st t, 2nd t, first and second terga; 1st s, 2nd s, first and second sterna; anatg, anatergum;
anepm, anepimeron; anepst, anepisternum; aspr, anterior spiracle; cx1, cx2, cx3, coxa, pro-, meso- and meta-; epm3 =
metaepimeron; eps3, metaepisternum; kepm, katepimeron; kepst, katepisternum; ktg, katatergum; mr, meron; ms,
metasternum; pal cal, postalar callus; pprn, postpronotum; prepm, proepimeron; prepst, proepisternum; pspr, posterior
spiracle; sbsc, subscutellum; sct, scutum; sctl, scutellum; spal area, supra-alar area; trn sut, transverse suture (Adapted
from Thompson, 1999).
102 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
described species without neuter termination, i.e.
clarum,difficile, and variscutatum. According to
Article 30.2.3 of the International Code of Zoological
Nomenclature (ICZN, 1999), Citrogramma must
therefore be treated as of neuter gender, and all new
species names follow this gender except nouns in
apposition. For previously described species, the origi-
nal masculine or feminine is converted to neuter
form, following Article 34.2 of ICZN (1999).
Biology
Only one prey species has been cited for Citro-
gramma, the brown citrus aphid or Toxoptera citri-
cida (Kirkaldy, 1907) (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
(Michaud, 1999). This citation, however, is a mistaken
assumption, as also suggested by Rojo et al. (2003),
because C. citrinum, cited as Syrphus citrinum (Bru-
netti, 1923), is not found in Florida (USA) from where
Michaud documented the record. Michaud was con-
tacted, the voucher specimen for this record exam-
ined, and it did not belong to Citrogramma.
A specimen of Citrogramma amarilla Mengual sp.
nov. from Shillong (Meghalaya, India) has a label
with the annotation ‘Found resting on Pine with
aphid attack’. This note suggests that some species
could be aphidophagous. A female specimen of C. no-
tiale was collected ‘among Araucaria cunninghamii’.
There are also two specimens of C. circumdatum col-
lected from a logging area (Bulolo, Papua New
Guinea) with the note: ‘Castanopsis/Bamboo forest’,
and four species with individuals collected in ‘moss
forest’: Citrogramma difficile,C. fascipleurum,Citro-
gramma hervebazini, and C. vockerothi.
A reared female of C. notiale, found on Ageratum
houstonianum Mill. (Asteraceae) in Samsonvale (Aus-
tralia, Queensland), was studied and to my knowl-
edge it is the only Citrogramma puparium known (see
Figs 124–126). Finally, in the original description of
C. notiale, Vockeroth (1969) cited a paratype female
from Sydney (Australia, New South Wales) collected
by McIvor in tunnels of Bostrychopsis jesuita (Fabri-
cius, 1775) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), in a wasp’s
nest. However, so far, nothing is clearly known of the
biology of these flower flies.
Distribution
Citrogramma is found in Oriental (Indomalayan) and
Australasian biotic regions, crossing Wallace’s line,
and in the southern provinces of China (see Fig. 2).
Biogeographical or faunal regions provide a means for
categorizing the main features of the distribution of
existing animals or plants but there is a considerable
controversy about the reality and practicality of them
because limits of faunas and floras do not correspond
exactly to certain geographical or political bound-
aries. Biotic regions are only a pragmatic instrument
Figure 2. World distribution of Citrogramma Vockeroth. The limit shown is only an approximation defined by collecting
points for specimens examined.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 103
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
to represent the average patterns of animal distribu-
tion, making ‘standard’ units for comparison purposes
only (Thompson, 1972). Thompson (1999b) pointed
out that only three countries, China, Indonesia, and
Mexico, extend across biotic regional boundaries. For
these countries, he used political subunits to draw the
boundaries. As Thompson (1999b) mentioned, this
separation is not the most accurate.
The genus Citrogramma has been cited from
Sichuan Province (Palaearctic China) and recently
found in Tibet (K. Huo pers. comm.). Based on the
original work of Wallace (1876), Delfinado & Hardy
(1973) included the southern region of Sichuan in
the Oriental Region ‘. . . mingling with the Palaearc-
tic fauna in the mountains south of the Yangtze
River. . .’. Citrogramma specimens from Sichuan and
Tibet were collected in the southern areas of these
provinces, close to Yunnan Province (China) and
Arunachal Pradesh (India), respectively. Thus, fol-
lowing the political boundaries in Thompson (1999b:
51, 63), Citrogramma is present in the Palaearctic
Region.
Specimens are here reported from Nepal, India,
Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam,
Laos, Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines, China [Tibet
(Xizang), Yunnan, Fujian, Sichuan, Hainan], Papua
New Guinea (PNG), Solomon Islands, New Cale-
donia, and Australia (see below in each species’
description). Material collected in Hainan Province
and Tibet was studied and identified by Huo. New
specimens and species from New Caledonia, Taiwan,
Nepal, and China expand the geographical distribu-
tion of Citrogramma.
Citrogramma species are found in nine different
biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al., 2000; Mittermeier
et al., 2005), including the Western Ghats, Sri Lanka,
Himalaya, Indo-Burma, Sundaland, Wallacea, Philip-
pines, East Melanesian Islands, and New Caledonia.
By definition, New Guinea Island is not a hotspot
but it has the highest known diversity of the genus
Citrogramma in number of species: a total of 15
described species and two other not formally
described species, plus another species, C. solomon-
ense, found in Boungainville and New Britain islands
(two provinces of PNG but not New Guinea Island).
Similar high species diversity in New Guinea was
reported for the syrphid genus Eosphaerophoria Frey,
1946 (Mengual & Ghorpadé, 2010).
Diagnosis
The genus Citrogramma is recognized amongst the
syrphines (subfamily Syrphinae, tribe Syrphini) by
the following combination of characters: (1) scutum
with lateral broad yellow vitta; (2) metasternum
pilose (except Citrogramma quadricornutum); (3)
abdomen margined; (4) scutum black with medial
brown or olivaceous pollinosity, usually with subme-
tallic area divided into vittae or not; and (5) sub-
scutellar fringe present.
Species groups of Citrogramma
Vockeroth (1969) mentioned that species of this genus
show much greater variation in the male terminalia
than do those of any other genus of the Syrphini.
Although the male genitalia are very variable in
Citrogramma, there are some similarities like sternum
9 being unusually reduced. Based on male genitalia
characters, Citrogramma species can be divided into
three groups: (1) species with overall male genitalia
similar or identical to C. henryi (Figs 129, 130); (2)
species with a slight variation in male genitalia com-
pared to the male genitalia of C. henryi, e.g. C. robertsi
(Fig. 149) or Citrogramma schlingeri (Fig. 141); and
(3) species with male genitalia that are very different
compared to male genitalia of C. henryi, e.g. C. bicor-
nutum or C. quadricornutum (Figs 140, 153).
After checking the male genitalia of all the Citro-
gramma species, most of them have similar male
genitalia, identical to C. henryi (see Figs 127–130).
As a result of this fact, male genitalia characters are
not useful in describing species if they do not belong
to the groups 2 or 3, and it is also the reason why
most of the time male genitalia characters were not
used in the identification key. However, there are a
few species that only differ by the male genitalia;
those are the cases of C. notiale and Citrogramma
australe (Australia), Citrogramma pintada and Cit-
rogramma pinyton (Papua New Guinea), or Citro-
gramma schlingeri,Citrogramma distinctum, and
Citrogramma triton (Papua New Guinea). These are
cryptic species with the same morphology and dif-
ferent male genitalia living in the same geographical
area, and recent speciation could explain the small
amount of morphological variation.
As to morphological characters, there are a few
species groups that can be recognized: (1) the C. no-
tiale species group, with C. notiale,C. australe,
C. asombrosum,C. bicornutum, and C. quadricornu-
tum (probably including C. sedlacekorum,C. quadra-
tum, and others); (2) the C. luteifrons species group,
with C. luteifrons,C. luteopleurum,C. schlingeri,
C. distinctum,C. pinyton,C. triton, and C. pintada;
(3) the C. clarum species group, with C. clarum,
C. amarilla,C. sp. B, C. matsumurai,C. frederici, and
possibly some others; (4) the C. citrinum species
group, with C. citrinum,C. citrinoides,C. chola,
C. henryi, and C. flavigenum; and (5) the C. gedeha-
num species group, with C. gedehanum,C. variscu-
tatum,C. wyatti,C. currani,C. fascipleurum, and
C. difficile. None of these five species groups deserve
a supraspecific category, except to note that species in
104 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
the same group are more morphologically related to
any other species placed in another group. Some
species are not included in these groups, such as
C. hervebazini or C. shirakii, both with very similar
and distinct male genitalia.
GENERA RELATED TO CITROGRAMMA
Before the establishment of the genus Citrogramma
by Vockeroth (1969), the species of this genus were
placed in several genera, i.e. Syrphus,Xantho-
gramma,orOlbiosyrphus. The genus Syrphus has
diagnostic characters that separate it from Citro-
gramma: the presence of abundant erect hairs on
dorsal surface of the ventral calypter [with one excep-
tion, Syrphus nov. spec. 2 Vockeroth in Thompson,
Thompson & Fairman, (2000) from Chile], metaster-
num bare, and/or metacoxa with a tuft of hair at
posteromedial apical angle. However, not all Syrphus
species have this combination and some of these char-
acters are present in Citrogramma species, e.g.
C. quadricornutum has no hairs on metasternum.
Another genus related to Citrogramma in the lit-
erature is the genus Olbiosyrphus Mik, 1897, which
was originally described based on Syrphus laetus Fab-
ricius, 1794 to include species of Xanthogramma with
pilose eyes (Mik, 1897). When Hervé-Bazin (1923a)
described Olbiosyrphus clarus (=Citrogramma
clarum), this genus was linked with Citrogramma
although no hairs can be seen on the eyes of the type
material. Hervé-Bazin, in the same publication, con-
sidered three species of de Meijere very similar to
O. clarus, i.e. luteifrons,gedehanus, and circumdatus,
all as Syrphus (Olbiosyrphus), giving the taxonomic
rank of subgenus to Olbiosyrphus, but three years
later he raised it to the rank of genus (Hervé-Bazin,
1926). Vockeroth (1969) did not find significant evi-
dence to keep Olbiosyrphus separated from Xantho-
gramma and synonymized it, placing this species in
Citrogramma as C. clarum.
The most problematic genus related to Citro-
gramma, in terms of difficulty to correctly separate
from, has been Xanthogramma Schiner, 1860. Most of
the old studied specimens of Citrogramma were iden-
tified as Xanthogramma because of their external
morphological resemblance. Vockeroth (1969) could
not find a unique character to separate them, and so
Citrogramma appeared several times in his key.
Below, the main differences found between Xantho-
gramma and Citrogramma are listed:
1. Subscutellar fringe: present in Citrogramma and
absent in Xanthogramma.
2. Metasternum pilosity: Xanthogramma has metast-
ernum bare and Citrogramma has it pilose (excep-
tion in C. quadricornutum).
3. Facial profile: Xanthogramma has antennal base
more prominent than oral apex, whereas Citro-
gramma has oral apex more prominent than
antennal base in lateral view.
4. Lateral mesonotal vitta: in Xanthogramma, the
lateral mesonotal yellow vitta does not reach the
scutellum, or the yellow area of the scutellum, and
the scutellum is bicoloured with a black fascia on
the basal part and a yellow distal portion. Citro-
gramma has a lateral yellow vitta from postprono-
tum to scutellum joined with the yellow area of the
scutellum. In Citrogramma, the scutellum is
yellow and may or may not have a medial black
macula, which never interrupts the continuity of
the lateral yellow vitta as in Xanthogramma.
5. Sternum 9: Citrogramma has a greatly reduced
sternum 9 in most species, but Xanthogramma has
normal sternum 9 in size.
Vockeroth (1969) used the last character and the
distribution of katepisternal pilosity as diagnostic to
keep both genera separate, although in his descrip-
tion of Citrogramma he stated that sometimes the
two hair patches on katepisternum may or may not be
connected, but Xanthogramma has these two hair
patches separated. Thus, this character is not used
here. Although the literature relates Xanthogramma
to Citrogramma, it seems that they are not closely
related as stated by Vockeroth (1969). Mengual et al.
(2009), in their cladistic analysis of Allograpta using
morphological characters, included Citrogramma as a
related genus in the AllograptaSphaerophoria clade,
with other genera like Episyrphus Matsumura &
Adachi, 1917, Meliscaeva Frey, 1946, Anu Thompson,
2008, Exallandra Vockeroth, 1969, Giluwea Vocker-
oth, 1969, Allograpta,Sphaerophoria Lepeletier &
Serville, 1828, and Eosphaerophoria. The results
showed that Citrogramma resolved in a polytomy.
The AllograptaSphaerophoria clade was recovered
and studied by Mengual, Ståhls & Rojo (2008a, b), but
Citrogramma was not included because of the lack of
available molecular data. Recently, Mengual & Ghor-
padé (2010) included Citrogramma in the identifica-
tion key for genera related with Eosphaerophoria.
NOTES ON XANTHOGRAMMA SPECIES DESCRIBED
AS ORIENTAL
Citrogramma occurs principally in Oriental and Aus-
tralasian regions (see comments on distribution
above), ranging from Vietnam and southern China,
southward to Sydney in Australia. By contrast, and
with the transfer of the Taiwanese ‘Xanthogramma
species to Citrogramma,Xanthogramma occurs
mainly in the Holarctic region, with Palaearctic and
Nearctic species, except for three poorly known
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 105
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
species from the Oriental region: Xanthogramma cal-
ceata Sack, 1926, Xanthogramma pruthii Deoras,
1942, and Xanthogramma indica Nayar, 1968.
XANTHOGRAMMA CALCEATA SACK, 1926
Sack (1926: 570) described X. calceata based on a
single female from Negros Occidental, a province of
the Philippines located in the Western Visayas region.
The remainder of his collection is now located
in Frankfurt (Senckenbergische Naturforschende
Gesellschaft, Research Institute and Natural History
Museum), but the single female collected by Banks
used to describe X. calceata was not there. Material of
X. calceata was looked for in the Baker’s collection at
the National Museum of Natural History (Washing-
ton, D.C.) because most of the material studied by
Sack was collected by Baker, but nothing was found.
Thus, the type material of this species is considered
lost. Based on the original description, X. calceata is
unlikely to be a Citrogramma species. Sack (1926:
571) said: ‘Auf dem zweiten und dritten Ring je eine
auf der Mitte breit unterbrochene rotgelbe Mittel-
binde, die den Seitenrand nicht ganz erreich’ [On each
the second and third rings (=terga), one red-yellow
central band, medially broadly interrupted, which
does not completely reach the side edge]. This
abdominal pattern, with two yellow maculae on terga
2 and 3 not reaching lateral margins, is not found in
Citrogramma but it could be Xanthogramma Schiner,
1860 or Scaeva Fabricius, 1805. Xanthogramma cal-
ceata has yellow face with medial black vitta, yellow
frons with medial black vitta, and lunule yellow, with
a faint pattern on tergum 4, following Sack’s (1926:
570) description and drawing (1926: pl. 1, fig. 8).
XANTHOGRAMMA PRUTHII DEORAS, 1942
Deoras (1943) described a new species of Xantho-
gramma from the Delhi area (India), named
X. pruthii. This species was reared from eggs found
amongst groups of Myzus persicae (Sulzer, 1776) and
adults have terga 2 to 4 each with two lateral curved
yellow maculae. This species was mentioned again
from New Delhi and adjoining areas by Anand, Rai &
Sharma (1967) and Anand (1986). They also reported
another species of this genus, as Xanthogramma sp.,
feeding on Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach, 1843) and
Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris, 1776) (Hemiptera,
Aphididae). Deoras also related his new species to
C. citrinum, at that time the only ‘Xanthogramma
species described from India. Ghorpadé (unpubl. data)
examined the type material at the Indian Agricultural
Research Institute (IARI, New Delhi) and found it to
be Scaeva latimaculata (Brunetti, 1923).
Similarly, other such mistaken identities were pub-
lished for ‘Xanthogramma sp.’ by Rao (1969),
Gokulpure (1972), Habib (1973), Rai (1976), Das &
Raychaudhuri (1983), Agarwala, Dutta & Ray-
chaudhuri (1983), Agarwala, Láska & Raychaudhuri
(1984), Anand (1986), and Aslamkhan, Safdar & Azi-
zullah (1997) from central and northern India, and
Pakistan, which are probably misidentifications for
either S. latimaculata or Allograpta javana (Wiede-
mann, 1824) (K. Ghorpadé pers. comm.).
XANTHOGRAMMA INDICA NAYAR, 1968
Nayar (1968) described a new species from India
based on a single female from Kalatop, Dalhousie
(India: Himachal Pradesh) and mentioned that it was
similar to X. citrinum Brunettii (=Citrogramma cit-
rinum). Based on his original description, this species
can be separated from the genus Citrogramma based
on abdominal pattern, with terga 3 and 4 with two
lateral curved yellow maculae. Xanthogramma indica
and X. pruthii are both described from northern India
and they share a similar abdominal and mesonotal
pattern, medial black facial vitta, frons, leg colour
pattern, and pleural pattern. Hence X. indica and
X. pruthii could be the same species. This argument
was corroborated by Ghorpadé (unpubl. data), who
studied the type material at the Zoological Survey of
India (NZSI, Calcutta) and synonymized it with S. la-
timaculata after examining the type material of S. la-
timaculata at BMNH, London.
Thus, the genus Xanthogramma has not so far been
found in the Oriental Region, except for Xantho-
gramma coreanum Shiraki, 1930, taken in some Ori-
ental Provinces of southern China (K. Ghorpadé pers.
comm.).
CITROGRAMMA AMARILLA MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Olbiosyrphus clarum of Hervé-Bazin, 1923a, b (in
part).
Syrphus difficilis of Curran, 1928 (in part).
Syrphus clarus of Curran, 1931b (in part).
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose, dark brown pilose dorsolater-
ally; gena yellow, yellow pilose posteriorly with brown
hairs on genal suture, white pollinose posteriorly;
holoptic; lunule yellow; frontal triangle yellow, dark
brown pilose; vertical triangle black, black pilose;
ocelli reddish; antenna orangish, black pilose on scape
and pedicel; basoflagellomere dark dorsally and dis-
tally; arista dark; occiput black, silver pollinose, white
pilose on ventral half, yellow pilose on dorsal half.
106 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
KEY TO CITROGRAMMA SPECIES
1. Face entirely yellow, or with at most a narrow brown area on tubercle (Figs 3, 4).....................................17
–. Face with median black vitta (Figs 5, 7, 12).........................................................................................2
2. Wing completely microtrichose ........................................................................................................... 7
–. Wing partially microtrichose, bare basally (Figs 131, 132) .......................................................................3
3. Costal cell microtrichose. Male: genitalia large, tergum 9 broad; anterior anepisternum yellow .....................5
–. Costal cell bare. Male: genitalia small, tergum 9 about one quarter as broad as abdomen; anterior anepisternum
dark dorsally (only in male)...............................................................................................................4
4. Wing microtrichose, except costal cell bare and cell CuP bare only in small anterior area (Figs 131). Male: frontal
triangle broad; angle between eyes approximately 110° (male; female unknown) (Malay peninsula).................
......................................................................................................................C. pendleburyi (Curran)
–. Wing more extensively bare basally; costal cell bare, cells BM, R, and R1bare, and cells CuP, DM, R2+3,R
4+5bare
basally (Fig. 132). Male: frontal triangle broad; angle between eyes approximately 100° (India).......................
.............................................................................................................C. marissa Mengual sp. nov.
5. Scutellum yellow with a medial rounded black macula reaching anterior margin (Figs 11, 14). Anal lobe bare
basally. Male: lunule black, frontal triangle yellow with medial black triangle (Fig. 12). Female: frons yellow with
anteromedial black triangle reaching ocellar triangle and dividing yellow area in two (Fig. 13) (PNG)..............
..................................................................................................................C. sedlacekorum Vockeroth
–. Scutellum yellow with a medial rounded black macula and anterior yellow fascia (Figs 15–17). Anal lobe entirely
microtrichose. Male: lunule black, frontal triangle yellow (Fig. 6). Female: frons yellow with anteromedial black
triangle not reaching ocellar triangle, forming yellow inverted V-shaped macula (Fig. 7)...............................6
6. Cell CuP bare basally; cell BM bare on anterior half. Abdominal terga 3 and 4 with narrow yellow fascia, about
one fifth or less of tergum length (Figs 15, 16). Male: tergum 7 normal; tergum 8 large but normal; genitalia with
regular cercus (Fig. 140) (PNG)...........................................................................C. bicornutum Vockeroth
–. Cell CuP entirely microtrichose; cell BM bare only on basoanterior small area, mostly microtrichose. Abdominal
terga 3 and 4 with broad yellow fascia, about one third of tergum length (Fig. 17). Male: tergum 7 with
anterolateral and posterolateral processes; tergum 8 with long subcylindrical process; genitalia with very large
cercus, longer than surstylus (Figs 135–137) (male; female unknown) (New Caledonia)..................................
.......................................................................................................C. asombrosum Mengual sp. nov.
7. Male: tergum 2 with two large squared yellow macula (Fig. 18). Female: tergum 2 with two large yellow maculae
joined medially occupying more than half of tergum, leaving a black macula on anterior margin of tergum 2; terga
3 and 4 with narrow yellow fascia (about one quarter of tergum length) expanded anteromedially and posteriorly
(about half of tergum length) (Fig. 19) (New Guinea)..................................C. quadratum Mengual sp. nov.
–. Male and female: tergum 2 with yellow fascia, or with two typical ‘golf club’-shaped, triangular or oval yellow
maculae, sometimes joined medially (Figs 20, 22, 23, 25) ........................................................................8
8. Scutellum with medial dark macula reaching anterior margin (Figs 20, 25, 26).........................................12
–. Scutellum with medial dark macula not reaching anterior margin, with anterior yellow fascia. Sometimes only
with at most diffuse brownish macula, but never reaching anterior scutellar margin (Figs 17, 22–24).............9
9. Wing bare very basally in cell BM. Male genitalia with very large, prominent cercus, longer than surstylus
(Figs 135–137) (male; female unknown) (New Caledonia)...........................C. asombrosum Mengual sp. nov.
–. Wing completely microtrichose. Male genitalia different, cercus not longer than surstylus (Australia)...........10
10. Females (Fig. 23) (Australia).....................................................................................C. notiale Vockeroth
–. Males...........................................................................................................................................11
11. Surstylus without dorsal process, with posterior margin pointed (Figs 138, 139) (Australia)............................
...........................................................................................................C. australe Thompson sp. nov.
–. Surstylus with swollen densely pilose club-like dorsal process (Fig. 157) (Australia)...........C. notiale Vockeroth
12. Metafemur mainly yellow, black on distal one third to two fifths (Taiwan, Hainan).......................................
......................................................................................................C. arisanicum (Shiraki) comb. nov.
–. Metafemur entirely black, sometimes yellowish on basal quarter ............................................................13
13. Pro- and mesofemur darker, yellow on basal two fifths or less. Pro- and mesotibia dark, brownish. Scutum with
undivided grey/submetallic bluish central area. Anepimeron yellow. Male: frontal triangle yellow with posterior
black vitta on eye margin and medial black triangle (Fig. 27). Female: frons yellow with medial black triangle and
with black vitta on posterior eye margin forming yellow inverted V-shaped marking (Fig. 28). Female: tergum 2
with two yellow macula joined medially with the same width of yellow fascia on terga 3 and 4 (Fig. 25)
(PNG).......................................................................................................................C. robertsi Wyatt
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 107
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
[NOTE: One male specimen of C. robertsi (see notes on C. robertsi) has anepimeron partly black, but the other
characters apply.]
–. Pro- and mesofemur yellow, brownish distally and/or basally. Pro- and mesotibia yellow. Scutum with central
pollinose or submetallic area divided into vittae (Figs 36, 111). At least the anterior anepimeron black (Figs 32, 35,
36). Male: frontal triangle yellow on eye margin, with or without medial black triangle (Figs 6, 9). Female: tergum
2 with two yellow maculae or yellow fascia (Figs 34, 40) .......................................................................14
14. Pleuron darker: katepisternum black with dorsal small yellow macula not reaching yellow area of katepimeron.
Proepimeron mostly black with small yellow macula; anterior anepisternum black (Fig. 32) (male; female
unknown) (Borneo, Java)..........................................................................................C. vockerothi Wyatt
–. Katepisternum black ventrally with dorsal large yellow macula connecting yellow areas of posterior anepisternum
with katepimeron and katatergum, forming a continuous band (Fig. 31). Proepimeron and anterior anepisternum
yellow (Fig. 31)..............................................................................................................................15
15. Thorax with lateral yellow vitta very narrow, notopleuron and supra-alar area black laterally (Figs 35, 36). Dark
species with narrow pale abdominal fasciae; terga 3 and 4 with narrow yellow fascia: less than one third of tergum
length in males, around one fifth of tergum length in females (Figs 33, 34) (PNG)........................................
................................................................................................................C. circumdatum (de Meijere)
–. Thorax with lateral yellow vitta not usually narrow, without ventral black macula on supra-alar area (Fig. 31).
Terga 3 and 4 with yellow fascia broader: more than one third of tergum length in males, around one third of
tergum length in females (Figs 29, 39, 40) ..........................................................................................16
16. Gena entirely yellow. Halter capitulum dark (Fig. 29). Notopleuron and supra-alar area laterally mainly black
pilose with yellow hairs. Male genitalia greatly enlarged; surstylus with long yellow hair tufts. Female: tergum
2 with a yellow fascia (Fig. 41) (Borneo, Malay peninsula) ........................................C. hervebazini (Curran)
–. Gena yellow with a black macula medially on genal groove, ventrad to eye (Figs 31, 38). Halter entirely
orange-yellow (Figs 39 and 40). Notopleuron and supra-alar area laterally yellow pilose. Male genitalia small,
without striking hair tufts. Female: tergum 2 with two yellow maculae (Fig. 40) [Solomon Islands, New Britain
Island (PNG)] ......................................................................................................C. solomonense Wyatt
17. Metasternum bare. Small, slender species with a pair of blue submetallic vittae on the scutum and with a dark
basal triangle on the scutellum (Figs 42–44) (PNG)..........................................C. quadricornutum Vockeroth
–. Metasternum pilose ........................................................................................................................18
18. Posterior anepisternum black on anterior third or more; clearly distinct from yellow (Figs 80, 88)................35
–. Posterior anepisternum yellow; sometime dark yellow anteroventrally (Figs 48, 58)...................................19
19. Anepimeron yellow, sometimes posterior section dark only dorsally (Figs 64, 69) .......................................21
–. Anepimeron black (Fig. 48)..............................................................................................................20
20. Scutellum entirely yellow; metafemur yellow, black on distal third. Male: tergum 3 with half of lateral margin
yellow; tergum 4 with half of lateral margin yellow; tergum 5 with lateral margin entirely yellow (Fig. 45) (male;
female unknown) (Taiwan).............................................................C. fumipenne (Matsumura) comb. nov.
–. Scutellum yellow with medial broad diffuse brownish macula (Fig. 47); metafemur yellow on basal quarter to third,
black on distal two thirds to three quarters (always black on more than half). Male: tergum 3 with quarter of
lateral margin yellow; tergum 4 with one third of lateral margin yellow; tergum 5 with half of lateral margin
yellow (Fig. 47) (male only) [West Papua, Sulawesi (Indonesia)]................................C. luteifrons (de Meijere)
21. Costal cell brown, as dark as stigma, and darker than the rest of the wing. Pro- and mesofemur black basally,
yellow apically (female only) (PNG)...................................................................C. schlingeri species group
–. Costal cell hyaline or infuscate but in contrast with stigma; stigma always darker. Pro- and mesofemur yellow.
...................................................................................................................................................22
22. Wing paler; stigma never very dark brown. Abdominal yellow fasciae reaching lateral margin (Fig. 49).........29
–. Wing infuscate, partly or entirely brown; stigma dark brown (Fig. 55). Abdominal yellow fasciae may or may not
reach lateral margin (Figs 51, 54) .....................................................................................................23
23. Abdominal yellow fasciae on terga 3 and 4 reaching lateral margin; lateral yellow margin broader than fascia
length (Fig. 54) (PNG, New Ireland Island) .....................................................................C. sp. 1 Mengual
–. Abdominal yellow fasciae on terga 3 and 4 not reaching lateral margin (Figs 51, 52). If terga 3 and 4 with yellow
fascia reach lateral margin, then yellow section on lateral margin much narrower than the fascia, less than half
fascia length (Fig. 59)......................................................................................................................24
24. Males...........................................................................................................................................25
–. Females........................................................................................................................................27
25. Frontal triangle entirely yellow, at most orangish medially; lunule yellow (Fig. 58). Notopleuron and after
transversal suture with lateral high hair density yellow (Fig. 58) (PNG).....C. luteopleurum Mengual sp. nov.
–. Frontal triangle yellow with medial dorsoposterior margin with black vitta; lunule brown (Fig. 63). Notopleuron
and after transversal suture with lateral high hair density black (PNG)..................................................26
26. Male genitalia as in Figure 155. Surstylus much broader posteriorly than anteriorly.....................................
.............................................................................................................C. pintada Mengual sp. nov.
108 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
–. Male genitalia as in Figure 156. Surstylus with narrowest portion at middle.......C. pinyton Mengual sp. nov.
27. Lunule yellow, at most orangish; frons yellow with lateral black vitta on eye margin on posterior half from ocellar
triangle and ending ventrally before antennal insertion (Fig. 57) (PNG)......C. luteopleurum Mengual sp. nov.
–. Lunule brownish, with a clear dorsal dark macula that can be extended posterodorsally in medial black vitta
reaching ocellar triangle (Fig. 64), or forms medial triangular long brown macula not reaching ocellar triangle.
Frons otherwise yellow with lateral broad black vitta on eye margin until antennal insertion, as broad as the
distance between posterior ocelli.......................................................................................................28
28. Supra-alar area densely yellow pilose ventrally (Fig. 64). Abdominal terga 3 and 4 with anterior black fascia
narrower than yellow fascia, which is as broad as about half tergum length (Fig. 65) (PNG) ... C. sp. 2 Mengual
–. Supra-alar area densely black pilose ventrally. Abdominal terga 3 and 4 with anterior black fascia as broad as
yellow fascia; yellow fasciae narrower and as broad as about one quarter tergum length (Fig. 62) (PNG)..........
...............................................................C. pintada Mengual sp. nov. and C. pinyton Mengual sp. nov.
29. Wing partially microtrichose, bare basally (Figs 133, 134)......................................................................33
–. Wing entirely microtrichose..............................................................................................................30
30. Notopleuron yellow pilose; supra-alar area yellow pilose laterally ...........................................................32
–. Notopleuron yellow pilose with black hairs laterally; supra-alar area black and yellow pilose laterally (only
females)........................................................................................................................................31
31. Frons yellow, at most orange medially; lunule yellow (Fig. 46) [West Papua, Sulawesi (Indonesia)]..................
.....................................................................................................................C. luteifrons (de Meijere)
–. Frons yellow with anteromedial brown-black triangular macula reaching or not ocellar triangle; lunule dark
(Fig. 82) (India) ........................................................................................................C. chola Ghorpadé
[NOTE. Immature females of C. chola with anepisternum yellowish may run here. Immature females of C. henryi
(from Sri Lanka) might also run here.]
32. Normal species (about 10 mm). Male: angle between eyes approximately 100° or fewer; tergum 5 with two yellow
maculae joined medially (Fig. 67). Female: abdominal tergum 2 with yellow fascia (Fig. 68); frons completely
yellow with posterior black margin sinuate following ocellar triangle (Fig. 66)....C. amarilla Mengual sp. nov.
–. Large species (more than 12 mm). Male: angle between eyes approximately 120° (Fig. 70); tergum 5 with two
yellow maculae separated (Fig. 72). Female: abdominal tergum 2 with two yellow maculae clear separated
(Fig. 73); frons yellow with posterior narrow black fascia making posterior margin straight, and lateral eye margin
black on dorsal half (Fig. 71) (Taiwan, PNG) ...........................................C. matsumurai Mengual sp. nov.
33. Wing more extensively bare: costal cell bare; cells R and BM bare, cell R bare on basal three quarters; cells R2+3,
R4+5, CuA1, and anal lobe bare basally; cell CuP microtrichose on distal quarter (Fig. 134) (female; male unknown)
(Myanmar)...........................................................................................................C. sp. B sensu Wyatt
Wing mainly microtrichose; cell R bare on basoanterior half until the furca of cell R2+3, and cell BM with small bare
area very close to anterior margin (Fig. 133) .......................................................................................34
34. Female: frons yellow with medial orange macula pointed posteriorly to ocellar triangle (Fig. 122); pro- and
mesotarsus dark (only females) (India).......................................C. frederici Mengual & Ghorpadé sp. nov.
Female: frons entirely yellow (Fig. 75); pro- and mesotarsus yellow. Male: angle between eyes approximately 120°;
eye contiguity about twice or more as long as the distance between angle of eyes and antennal bases when viewed
from above (Fig. 74)...........................................................................................C. clarum (Hervé-Bazin)
35. Scutellum with a sharply defined basal black triangle (Figs 93, 101, 102)................................................ 45
–. Scutellum with at most a diffuse dark basal macula (Figs 83, 85, 91)......................................................36
36. Metafemur black, at most dull yellow at extreme base..........................................................................40
–. Metafemur yellow on basal third or more ...........................................................................................37
37. Frontal triangle narrow; angle between eyes 90° or under (Figs 81, 87)...................................................39
–. Frontal triangle broad; angle between eyes clearly more than 90° (Figs 70, 74). Females unknown, but females
with wing bare basally will run here.................................................................................................38
38. Male genitalia large; surstylus with long yellow hair tufts (Fig. 152). Wing completely microtrichose. Procoxa and
metacoxa yellow (Taiwan)...........................................................................C. shirakii Mengual sp. nov.
–. Male genitalia small; surstylus without long hair tufts (Fig. 144). Wing microtrichose, partly bare (cell R bare
anterobasally, and cell BM bare basally) (Fig. 133). Procoxa black on basal half, yellow on distal half; metacoxa
mainly dark/black (India).........................................................C. frederici Mengual & Ghorpadé sp. nov.
39. Male: notopleuron yellow pilose with black hairs posterolaterally; anterior anepimeron yellow (Fig. 80); lunule
brown; frontal triangle yellow (Fig. 81); tergum 3 with a yellow fascia markedly emarginate posteriorly and
distinctly narrowing to lateral margins (a few specimens have the fascia divided in centre); tergum 4 with a yellow
fascia with sinuate posterior margin and tergum 5 with a yellow fascia (Fig. 83). Female: notopleuron yellow pilose
with black hairs posterolaterally; anterior anepimeron yellow; lunule black with a dark area extended dorsome-
dially to vertex; frons with dorsal black fascia making the ocellar triangle broader (Fig. 82); tergum 4 with a yellow
fascia very sinuate (Fig. 84) (India) ..............................................................................C. chola Ghorpadé
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 109
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
–. Male: notopleuron entirely yellow pilose; anepimeron black, yellow dorsomedially (Fig. 88); lunule brown, frontal
triangle with a medial triangular brownish orange macula (Fig. 87); tergum 3 with a yellow fascia with subparallel
margins and only very slightly narrowing to lateral margins; tergum 4 with a yellow fascia with subparallel posterior
margin and tergum 5 with two yellow maculae (Fig. 85). Female: notopleuron yellow pilose with black hairs
posterolaterally; anterior anepimeron yellow; lunule yellow; frons yellow medially (Fig. 86); tergum 4 with
subparallel yellow fascia, broadening to lateral margins (Fig. 89) (India, Thailand, Malay peninsula, Hainan).....
.........................................................................................................................C. citrinum (Brunetti)
[NOTE. Citrogramma luteopleurum or females of C. luteifrons may key here if couplet 18 was not properly evaluated.
Citrogramma luteopleurum and C. luteifrons have dorsomedial anepimeron yellow and yellow macula on katepisternum
connected to anterior anepisternum forming a continuous band.]
40. Pro- and mesofemur entirely yellow, only brownish anteriorly in some cases; with this combination of characters:
lunule yellow with dorsal orange macula (Fig. 94); gena yellow (Fig. 94); wing slightly brownish distally; notopleuron
and supra-alar area mainly yellow pilose with a few black hairs (male; female unknown) (Malaysia, Hainan)...C-
. citrinoides Wyatt
[NOTE. Citrogramma flavigenum also has dense yellow hairs on the lateral section of notopleuron and supra-alar area,
but lunule is black, pro- and mesofemur are black basally, and some specimens have a brown macula on facial tubercle.]
–. Pro- and mesofemur at least black on basal fifth to quarter; with other combination of characters..................41
41. Gena yellow with a black macula medially on genal groove, ventrad to eye (Fig. 98) (Sri Lanka).......................
............................................................................................................................C. henryi Ghorpadé
–. Gena entirely yellow (Fig. 99) ...........................................................................................................42
42. Frontal triangle narrow; angle between eyes slightly under 90°; eye contiguity slightly shorter than the distance
between angle of eyes and antennal bases when viewed from above (Fig. 56) (male; female unknown)
(India)..................................................................................................................C. flavigenum Wyatt
–. Frontal triangle broader; angle between eyes approximately 105°; eyes contiguity about two times as long as the
distance between angle of eyes and antennal bases when viewed from above (Figs 9, 50)..............................43
43. Male: genitalia large, tergum 9 about half as broad as abdomen or more (Fig. 10). Frontal triangle yellow (Fig. 9).
Pro- and mesofemur yellow, brown on basal third to half; pro- and mesotibia yellow (Java) ..............................
...........................................................................................................C. pennardsi Mengual sp. nov.
–. Male: genitalia small, tergum 9 about one quarter as broad as abdomen or less. Frontal triangle yellow with a medial
brownish triangle, with narrow black vitta on dorsoposterior margin, from eye union to antennal base level (Fig. 50).
Pro- and mesofemur black, brownish apically; pro- and mesotibia brownish ...............................................44
44. Superior lobe elongate; surstylus, in lateral view, with posterior part broader than anterior part (Fig. 141) (male
only) (PNG).........................................................................................C. schlingeri Thompson sp. nov.
–. Superior lobe very elongated and narrower medially; surstylus elongate, digitiform (Fig. 142) (male only)
(PNG)................................................................................................C. distinctum Thompson sp. nov.
–. Superior lobe broader and shorter; surstylus broad, expanded laterally (Fig. 143) (male only) (PNG)..................
.................................................................................................................C. triton Mengual sp. nov.
45. Pro- and mesofemur black on basal third. Notopleuron yellow and black pilose. Male: face with lateral hairs mostly
black (Fig. 96) (Malaysia, Indonesia)..................................................................C. variscutatum (Curran)
–. Pro- and mesofemur entirely yellow. Notopleuron only yellow pilose. Male: face with lateral hairs extensively yellow
(Fig. 99)........................................................................................................................................46
46. Metafemur entirely black.................................................................................................................48
–. Metafemur yellow on basal half.........................................................................................................47
47. Gena entirely yellow (Fig. 99). Male: abdominal terga 3 and 4 with broad yellow fasciae strongly emarginate
posteromedially (Fig. 101); angle between eyes approximately 85-90° (Fig. 95). Female: frons yellow with medial
triangular black macula reaching or not reaching ocellar triangle, lateral margins black on posterodorsal half; lunule
dark (Fig. 97) (Thailand, Hainan, India)........................................................C. currani Ghorpadé sp. nov.
–. Gena yellow with dark macula on genal groove, ventrad to eye (Fig. 98). Male: abdominal terga 3 and 4 with straight
yellow fasciae narrowing laterally (Fig. 103); angle between eyes approximately 117° (Fig. 105). Female: frons
orangish yellow with lateral margins black on posterodorsal half; lunule yellow (Fig. 106) (PNG)......................
.................................................................................................................C. wyatti Mengual sp. nov.
48. Males...........................................................................................................................................49
–. Females........................................................................................................................................51
49. Facial hairs entirely yellow; frontal triangle black pilose. Notopleuron laterally yellow pilose. Anepimeron black,
except dorsomedial section yellow (Figs 115, 118)..................................................................................50
–. Face yellow pilose medially and ventrally, black pilose laterally from lunule to tentorial pit; frontal triangle black
pilose. Notopleuron yellow pilose, with black hairs posterolaterally. Anterior anepimeron black, dorsomedial and
posterior anepimeron yellow (Fig. 110) (Borneo)......................................................C. fascipleurum (Curran)
50. Terga 3 and 4 with yellow fascia, about one third of tergum length, slightly emarginate posteriorly and slightly
narrowed laterally (Fig. 112) (Malay peninsula, Borneo) ..................................................C. difficile (Curran)
110 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Thorax: Scutum blackish brown with dorsomedial
area uniformly bluish grey pollinose with some metal-
lic iridescence, with lateral broad yellow vitta, yellow
pilose with black hairs on posterior half and on posta-
lar callus, with two or three black hairs on noto-
pleuron; postpronotum yellow; notopleuron yellow
continuing to scutellum, with postalar callus entirely
yellow; scutellum yellow, black pilose, subscutellar
fringe complete with brown hairs. Pleuron mostly
yellow, except katepisternum black ventrally and
meron dark, entirely yellow pilose; metasternum
pilose; calypter yellow, brownish dorsally with long
yellow hairs and short black hairs on margin;
plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular fringes
yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane hyaline, entirely microtri-
chose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow, yellow pilose; pro-
and mesofemur yellow, mainly black pilose, yellow
pilose basally; pro- and mesotibia yellow, black pilose;
pro- and mesotarsus brown; metafemur yellow on
basal half to two thirds, brown/dark on distal third to
half; metatibia brown with medial yellow annulus;
metatarsus dark brown, black pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 67. Parallel-sided, slightly oval,
terga 3, 4, and 5 vaguely margined. Dorsum mainly
black or dark brown, black pilose dorsally and later-
ally except tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and
tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal half
and dorsally on yellow maculae; tergum 1 black,
yellow laterally; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral
round yellow maculae, extended forward laterally to
anterolateral tergum margin (like ‘golf club’-shaped
spots), yellow lateral margin on anterior half; terga 3
and 4 black with broad yellow fascia, about one third
to two fifths of tergum length; tergum 5 black with
very broad yellow fascia with posterior margin
curved; sterna mainly yellow, yellow and black pilose;
male genitalia small, as in Figures 127 and 130.
Female: Similar to male except for normal sexual
dimorphism and as follows: face entirely yellow
pilose, frons yellow, dark brown pilose; ocellar tri-
angle black; occiput yellow pilose. Scutum yellow
pilose, with some black hairs posteriorly close to
scutellum and on postalar callus, but lesser black
hairs than in male; notopleuron yellow pilose;
katepisternum grey pollinose on black ventral area.
Pro- and mesobasitarsomere yellowish basally,
brown distally; metafemur yellow on basal two
thirds, dark brown on distal third; abdominal
tergum 2 with two ‘golf club’-shaped yellow maculae
joined medially forming a yellow fascia but of dif-
ferent shape than those on terga 3 and 4; tergum 4
with yellow fascia broader at lateral margin; tergum
5 with yellow lateral margin on basal four fifths
(Fig. 68).
Variation: In all specimens the yellow annulus of the
metatibia is difficult to see because most of them
have brownish metatibia, so there is little contrast.
Paratype male from Philippines has abdomen com-
pressed anteroposteriorly; thus, abdominal charac-
ters are difficult to see but it seems that tergum 5
has two triangular yellow maculae instead of a
yellow fascia.
Females have small differences amongst them.
Some specimens have a few black hairs on postalar
callus but others do not. The most variant female is
the one from Pahang Province, previously a paratype
of C. difficile. Its frons matches the description but it
has a very small black fascia posteriorly on lateral
margin. Consequently it was not included as a
paratype. The other male from India was not included
in the type series because its head is lost.
Length (N =4): Body, 9.0–10.1 (9.7) mm; wing, 7.8–8.9
(8.3) mm.
–. Terga 3 and 4 with broader fascia, about half of tergum length, strongly emarginate posteriorly and very narrow
laterally, lateral yellow margin being narrower than half fascia length (Fig. 116) (Java, Sumatra, Hainan) ...........
.................................................................................................................C. gedehanum (de Meijere)
51. Lunule dark, brown to black; frons yellow with medial triangular black macula reaching black area of ocellar triangle
or not (Fig. 109). Posterior anepimeron mostly black (Fig. 114)................................................................52
–. Lunule yellow; frons yellow, slightly darker medially (Fig. 107). Posterior anepimeron yellow (Fig. 110) (Borneo)..
.....................................................................................................................C. fascipleurum (Curran)
52. Occiput dark/black pilose on dorsal third (Malay peninsula, Borneo) ..................................C. difficile (Curran)
–. Occiput yellow pilose on dorsal third (Java, Sumatra, Hainan) ................................C. gedehanum (de Meijere)
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 111
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 3–14. 3, Citrogramma amarilla, frontal view of female head. 4, Citrogramma flavigenum, frontal view of male
head. 5–7, Citrogramma bicornutum: 5, frontal view of male head; 6, dorsal view of male head; 7, anterodorsal view of
female head. 8–10, Citrogramma pennardsi: 8, dorsal view of male abdomen; 9, dorsal view of male head; 10, ventral view
of male genitalia (detail). 11–14, Citrogramma sedlacekorum: 11, dorsal view of female abdomen; 12, dorsal view of male
head; 13, dorsal view of female head; 14, dorsal view of male abdomen.
112 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 15–26. Dorsal view of abdomen. 15–16, Citrogramma bicornutum: 15, female; 16, male. 17, Citrogramma
asombrosum, male. 18–19, Citrogramma quadratum: 18, male; 19, female. 20–21, Citrogramma arisanicum: 20, male; 21,
female. 22, Citrogramma australe, male. 23–24, Citrogramma notiale: 22, female; 24, male. 25–26, Citrogramma robertsi:
25, female; 26, male.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 113
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 27–38. 27–28, Citrogramma robertsi: 27, dorsal view of male head; 28, dorsal view of female head. 29,
Citrogramma hervebazini, dorsal view of male abdomen. 30, Citrogramma vockerothi, dorsal view of male abdomen. 31,
Citrogramma solomonense, lateral view of male pleuron. 32, C. vockerothi, lateral view of male pleuron and head. 33–37,
Citrogramma circumdatum: 33, dorsal view of male abdomen; 34, dorsal view of female abdomen; 35, lateral view of male
pleuron; 36, dorsolateral view of female scutum and pleuron; 37, dorsal view of female head; 38, C. solomonense, lateral
view of male head.
114 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 39–50. 39–40, Citrogramma solomonense: 39, dorsal view of male abdomen; 40, dorsal view of female abdomen.
41, Citrogramma hervebazini, dorsal view of female abdomen. 42–44, Citrogramma quadricornutum: 42, dorsal view of
male abdomen; 43, dorsal view of female abdomen; 44, dorsal view of male scutum and scutellum. 45, Citrogramma
fumipenne, dorsal view of male abdomen. 46–49. Citrogramma luteifrons: 46, dorsal view of female head; 47, dorsal view
of male abdomen; 48, lateral view of male pleuron and head; 49, dorsal view of female abdomen. 50, Citrogramma
schlingeri, dorsal view of male head.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 115
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 51–62. 51–52, Citrogramma schlingeri: 51, dorsal view of male abdomen; 52, dorsal view of female abdomen. 53,
Citrogramma flavigenum, dorsal view of male abdomen. 54–55, Citrogramma sp. 1: 54, dorsal view of female abdomen;
55, wing. 56, C. flavigenum, dorsal view of male head. 57–60, Citrogramma luteopleurum: 57, dorsal view of female head;
58, dorsal view of male head and lateral view of scutum; 59, dorsal view of male abdomen; 60, dorsal view of female
abdomen. 61–62, Citrogramma pintada: 61, dorsal view of male abdomen; 62, dorsal view of female abdomen.
116 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 63–75. 63, Citrogramma pintada, dorsal view of male head. 64–65, Citrogramma sp. 2: 64, lateral view of
pleuron and dorsal view of female head; 65, dorsal view of female abdomen. 66–69, Citrogramma amarilla: 66, dorsal view
of female head; 67, dorsal view of male abdomen; 68, dorsal view of female abdomen; 69, lateral view of female pleuron
and head. 70–73, Citrogramma matsumurai: 70, dorsal view of male head; 71, dorsal view of female head; 72, dorsal view
of male abdomen; 73, dorsal view of female abdomen. 74–75, Citrogramma clarum: 74, dorsal view of male head; 75,
dorsal view of female head.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 117
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 76–87. 76–77, Citrogramma clarum: 76, dorsal view of male abdomen; 77, dorsal view of female abdomen. 78,
Citrogramma shirakii, dorsal view of male abdomen. 79, Citrogramma frederici, dorsal view of male abdomen. 80–84,
Citrogramma chola: 80, lateral view of male head and pleuron; 81, dorsal view of male head; 82, dorsal view of female
head; 83, dorsal view of male abdomen; 84, dorsal view of female abdomen. 85-87, Citrogramma citrinum: 85, dorsal view
of male abdomen; 86, dorsal view of female head; 87, dorsal view of male head.
118 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 88–99. 88–89, Citrogramma citrinum: 88, lateral view of male head and pleuron; 89, dorsal view of female
abdomen. 90, Citrogramma citrinoides, dorsal view of male abdomen. 91–92, Citrogramma henryi: 91, dorsal view of male
abdomen; 92, dorsal view of female abdomen. 93, Citrogramma variscutatum, dorsal view of male abdomen. 94,
C. citrinoides, frontal view of male head. 95, Citrogramma currani, dorsal view of male head. 96, C. variscutatum, lateral
view of male head. 97, C. currani, anterodorsal view of female head. 98, C. henryi, lateral view of male head. 99,
C. currani, lateral view of female head.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 119
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 100–111. 100, Citrogramma variscutatum, dorsal view of female abdomen. 101–102, Citrogramma currani: 101,
dorsal view of male abdomen; 102, dorsal view of female abdomen. 103–106, Citrogramma wyatti: 103, dorsal view of male
abdomen; 104, dorsal view of female abdomen; 105, anterodorsal view of male head; 106, dorsal view of female head. 107,
Citrogramma fascipleurum, anterodorsal view of female head. 108–109, Citrogramma difficile: 108, frontal view of male
head; 109, dorsal view of female head. 110, C. fascipleurum, lateral view of female pleuron and head. 111, C. difficile,
dorsal view of head, scutum and scutellum.
120 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 112–121. 112–115, Citrogramma difficile: 112, dorsal view of male abdomen; 113, dorsal view of female abdomen;
114, dorsal view of female head and lateral view of pleuron; 115, lateral view of male head and pleuron. 116–118,
Citrogramma gedehanum: 116, dorsal view of male abdomen; 117, dorsal view of female abdomen; 118, lateral view of
male pleuron. 119–120, Citrogramma marissa: 119, dorsal view of male abdomen; 120, dorsal view of female abdomen.
121, Citrogramma pendleburyi, dorsal view of male abdomen.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 121
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 122–130. 122–123, Citrogramma frederici: 122, frontal view of female head; 123, dorsal view of female abdomen.
124–126, Citrogramma notiale species group: 124, lateral view of puparium; 125, dorsal view of puparium; 126, posterior
view of posterior breathing tube and spiracular openings (detail). 127, Citrogramma citrinum, left lateral view of male
genitalia. 128–129, Citrogramma henryi: 128, left lateral view of male genitalia; 129, tergum 9 and surstyli, dorsal view.
130, C. henryi (from Vockeroth, 1969 as C. citrinum): a, left lateral view; b, superior lobe, lateral, outline only; c, sternum
9, superior lobes and aedeagal base, ventral view.
122 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Geographical distribution: India, Nepal, Java, Philip-
pines, Thailand, Laos, Hainan.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Spanish amarillo meaning yellow, and refers to the
large yellow areas on thorax and face. Species epithet
to be treated as a noun in apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Species very similar to
the female of Citrogramma matsumurai.Citro-
gramma matsumurai is larger than C. amarilla
(13.1 versus 9.9 mm) and its abdomen is more
oval. Female of C. matsumurai has frons mainly
yellow with posterior small black fascia joined to
ocellar triangle (Fig. 71); thus, black posterodorsal
Figures 131–139. 131–134, microtrichia pattern of wing. 131, Citrogramma pendleburyi. 132, Citrogramma marissa.
133, Citrogramma clarum. 134, Citrogramma sp. B. 135–137, Citrogramma asombrosum, male genitalia: 135, left lateral
view; 136, tergum 9 and surstyli, dorsal view; 137, terga 7, 8, and 9, and surstyli, lateroventral view (as in pinned
specimen). 138–139, Citrogramma australe: 138, left lateral view; 139, tergum 9 and surstyli, dorsal view.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 123
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
area of frons in C. matsumurai is larger (see
Figs 66, 71).
Citrogramma amarilla is clearly related to
C. clarum, but can be easily separated from this by
wing being completely microtrichose and frons entirely
yellow. Citrogramma clarum has wing partly bare
basally (cell R bare on basoanterior half; see Fig. 124)
and frons is black laterally on dorsal two fifths (narrow
lateral vitta from ocellar triangle) (Fig. 75).
Remarks: This species is clearly separable from
C. clarum by its wing microtrichia and frons. During
my study, I realised that the part of the identification
key including C. matsumurai,C. amarilla,C. sp. B,
and C. clarum could be a difficult species group, espe-
cially for females. Based on its widespread distribu-
tion, I did consider that this taxon defined here might
group females from several species that look morpho-
logically identical.
Figures 140–144. Male genitalia. 140, Citrogramma bicornutum (from Vockeroth, 1969): a, left lateral view; b, superior
lobe, lateral, outline only; c, sternum 9, superior lobes and aedeagal base, ventral view; d, right surstylus, lateral view.
141, Citrogramma schlingeri, left lateral view. 142, Citrogramma distinctum, left lateral view. 143, Citrogramma triton,
left lateral view. 144, Citrogramma frederici, left lateral view.
124 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Holotype male deposited in the Nationaal Nat-
uurhistorische Museum ‘Naturalis’ (Leiden, The
Netherlands) and labelled: ‘S. India, Madras St./
Anamalai Hills/Kadamparai 3500 ft./v1963/P. Susai
Nathan’ ‘Miogramma citrinum Brun.//det. v. Does-
burg’ [handwritten except third line] ‘HOLOTYPE/
Citrogramma/amarilla/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red,
second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: India: Tamil Nadu, Anaimalai Hills,
Kadamparai, 1067 m, 10°22N, 77°07.5E.
Figures 145–150. Male genitalia. 145, Citrogramma matsumurai, left lateral view. 146, Citrogramma wyatti, left lateral
view. 147–148, Citrogramma pennardsi: 147, left lateral view; 148, tergum 9 and surstyli, dorsal view. 149, Citrogramma
robertsi, left lateral view. 150, Citrogramma quadratum, left lateral view.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 125
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Figures 151–153. Male genitalia. 151, Citrogramma hervebazini (from Vockeroth, 1969): a, left lateral view, surstylus
outlined only; b, superior lobe, lateral, outline only; c, sternum 9, superior lobes and aedeagal base, ventral view; d, left
surstylus, lateral view. 152, Citrogramma shirakii, left lateral view. 153, Citrogramma quadricornutum (from Vockeroth,
1969): a, left lateral view (sternum 9 mostly hidden); b, superior lobe, lateral, outline only; c, sternum 9 and genitalia,
left lateral view; d, tergum 9 and cerci, dorsal view; e, sternum 9, superior lobes and aedeagal base, ventral view; f, right
surstylus, lateral view.
126 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes. India: West Bengal, Darjeeling,
Gopaldhara, Bw, 4720 ft, 10.vii.1911, H. Stevens [1,
BMNH]; PHILIPPINES: Mountain Prov., Abatan,
Buguias 60 km S of Bontoc, 1800–2000 m., 27.v.1964,
H.M. Torrevillas [1, BPBM]; NEPAL: Ktmd., Goda-
vari, 6000 ft, 13.viii.1967, Can. Nepal Exped. [1,
CNC]; MALAYSIA: B.N. Borneo, Mt Kinabalu,
Kenokok, 3300 ft, 24.iv.1929, H.M. Pendlebury [1,
BMNH]; INDONESIA: Java ‘Olbiosyrphus/clarum/H.-
B./cotype’[1, MNHN]; W Java, G. Tjimerang, Djam-
pang Tengah, 600 m, iii.1937, M.E. Walsh [1,
Figures 154–157. Male genitalia. 154, Citrogramma sedlacekorum (from Vockeroth, 1969): a, left lateral view (sternum
8 included); b, superior lobe, lateral, outline only; c, sternum 9, superior lobes and aedeagal base, ventral view; d, right
surstylus, lateral view. 155, Citrogramma pintada, left lateral view. 156, Citrogramma pinyton, left lateral view. 157,
Citrogramma notiale: a, left lateral view; b, superior lobe, lateral, outline only; c, sternum 9, superior lobes and aedeagal
base, ventral view; d, right surstylus, dorsal view.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 127
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
RMNH]; West Java, Wynkoopsbay, ii.1937, R. Mus.
Hist. Nat. Belg. I.G.11.161 [1, IRSNB]; THAILAND:
Khun Tan Mts., 4000 ft, v.1933, H.M. Smith [1,
USNM]; Chiang Mai Province, Dai Chow Cheng,
xi.1920, J.F. Rock [1, BPBM]; Chiang Mai Province,
Doi Chiang Dao, 1150 m, 11.viii.1990, H. Bänziger
[1, BMNH]; LAOS: Nam Long, 28.iv.1918, R. Vitalis
de Salvaza ‘Olbiosyrphus/clarum/Hervé-Bazin/cotype
[1, MNHN]; Dang He, 29.iv.1918, R. Vitalis de
Salvaza ‘Olbiosyrphus/clarum/Hervé-Bazin/cotype
[1, MNHN].
Nontype material. INDIA: Shillong, 15.vii.1961,
CIBC-IS [1, BMNH]; MALAYSIA: Pahang, Cameron
Highlands, Rhododendron Hill, 5200 ft, 21.vi.1923,
H.M. Pendlebury ‘Allotype/Syrphus/difficilis/Curran
[1, BMNH]; CHINA: Hainan, Wuzhishan City,
Shuiman Town, 23–25.v.2007, Yi-Bi Ba & Jun-Tong
Lang [2, SBSC] (Huo, unpubl. data).
CITROGRAMMA ARISANICUM (SHIRAKI, 1930)
COMB.NOV.
Xanthogramma arisanicum Shiraki, 1930: 405. Lec-
totype: , NIAS, here designated. Type locality:
Taiwan: Arisan, here restricted by lectotype designa-
tion. Shiraki,1930: 405, fig. 93a, b.
Xanthogramma arisanica of Knutson et al., 1975:
320.
Geographical distribution: Taiwan, Hainan.
Differential diagnosis: Very distinct species with a
medial black facial vitta, scutellum without defined
black triangle (Figs 20, 21), metafemur mainly yellow
and small male genitalia. Species with a medial black
facial vitta less evident than in other species, e.g.
C. circumdatum. Male has anepimeron black and a
broad yellow fascia on abdominal terga 3, 4, and 5
(Fig. 20). Female has anepimeron yellow, a broad
yellow fascia on abdominal terga 3, 4, and 5 and
tergum 2 with two yellow maculae slightly joined
medially (Fig. 21). The paralectotype shows the dor-
somedial area of the scutum covered with grey polli-
nosity and a bluish metallic iridescence divided by
two black vittae. In the male lectotype, this character
cannot be seen.
Remarks: Species originally described as Xantho-
gramma arisanicum Shiraki 1930. Only a male and a
female of the type series were available for study, and
both specimens belong to Citrogramma.
Shiraki based his species on a series of three
females and two males from different localities in
Taiwan, such as Arisan, Shishito, Kosempo, and
Fuhosho, but he did not designate a holotype in his
work. Amongst the syntypes, deposited at the Natural
Resources Inventory Center (National Institute for
Agro-environmental Sciences, Ibaraki, Tsukuba,
Japan), there is a pinned male labelled ‘Formosa./
Arisan, 1918/X 2–23./J. Sonana,/M. Yoshino’,
Xanthogramma/arisanicum/Det. T. Shiraki’ [hand-
written except third line], ‘Type’ [round, handwritten
in red] ‘LECTOTYPE/Citrogramma/arisanicum/det.
X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and third lines hand-
written]. This specimen is here designated as the
lectotype to fix and ensure the universal and consis-
tent interpretation of the name. The other female
syntype has been labelled as a paralectotype.
Type locality: Taiwan: Nantou County, Mount Arisan,
23°34N, 120°49E.
Material examined. Type material. Lectotype,as
above. Paralectotype.T
AIWAN: Formosa [=Taiwan],
Arisan, 2–23.x.1918, J. Sonana & M. Yoshino [1,
NIAS].
Nontype material. CHINA: Hainan, Wuzhishan City,
Shuiman Town, 23–25.v.2007, Ba Yi-Bi & Lang Jun-
Tong [11, SBSC] (Huo, unpubl. data).
CITROGRAMMA ASOMBROSUM MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, yellow with
medial dark vitta, from oral apex to antennal base,
narrower than yellow lateral areas of face, yellow
pilose, black pilose laterodorsally; gena yellow,
yellow pilose; holoptic; lunule yellow; frontal tri-
angle yellow with anteromedial black diffuse trian-
gular area pointed posteriorly, black pilose; vertical
triangle black, black pilose; ocelli reddish; antenna
dark brown, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere orangish, dark dorsally; arista
brown; occiput black, silver pollinose, white pilose
on ventral two thirds, golden-yellow pilose on dorsal
third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area uni-
formly grey pollinose with bluish metallic iridescence,
lateral yellow vitta and sublateral matte black vitta,
black and yellow pilose, but notopleuron yellow pilose
with some black hairs posteriorly; postpronotum
yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until scutel-
lum, with postalar callus entirely yellow and black
pilose; scutellum yellow with dorsomedial broad
defined dark macula not reaching anterior margin,
creating narrow yellow margin all around, black
pilose, subscutellar fringe complete with black hairs.
Pleuron mostly black, except anterior anepisternum
yellow; proepisternum yellow; posterior anepisternum
yellow on posterior half; katepisternum with dorsal
128 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
yellow macula; katepimeron and katatergum yellow,
black posteriorly. Pleuron entirely yellow pilose,
golden pollinose. Metasternum pilose; calypter yellow
with brownish hairs on margin; plumula yellow;
halter yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brownish, entirely microtri-
chose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Procoxa yellow, mesocoxa black, metacoxa yel-
lowish brown; pro- and mesofemur black dorsally
(exterior part of metafemur) and yellowish ventrally
(inner part of metafemur), mainly black pilose with
yellow hairs basally; pro- and mesotibia yellow; pro-
and mesotarsus brown; metaleg black, metafemur
slightly swollen, black pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 17. Parallel-sided, abdominal
margin partly visible on terga 4 and 5. Dorsum
mainly black, black pilose dorsally and laterally
except tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2
yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal half; tergum 1
black; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral triangu-
lar rounded-tip yellow maculae, yellow lateral
margin on anterior half; terga 3 and 4 black with
broad yellow fascia (about one third to two fifths of
tergum length) on anterior half of tergum, with ante-
rior narrow black fascia; tergum 5 black with medial
narrow yellow fascia; sterna yellow, yellow pilose
with black hairs laterally except terga 3 and 4 black
on posterior half, tergum 4 black pilose, with poste-
rior margin emarginate on right side to accommo-
date genitalia; tergum 5 reduced; genital segments
brownish, sternum 7 with anterior small projection
and posterior small projection, sternum 8 with pos-
terolateral large projection; male genitalia broad, as
in Figures 135–137.
Female: Unknown.
Length (N =1): Body, 8.1 mm; wing, 7.8 mm.
Geographical distribution: New Caledonia.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Spanish asombroso meaning amazing, astonishing.
This refers to the surprising male genitalia of this
species. Species epithet to be treated as an adjective.
Ecology: Holotype collected in a Malaise trap set in
tropical forest habitat.
Differential diagnosis: Very distinctive species with
black facial vitta, costal cell microtrichose, scutellum
with a medial black macula not reaching anterior
margin, and large male genitalia with processes on
terga 7 and 8. Citrogramma asombrosum is similar
to C. bicornutum, but C. asombrosum has cell BM
bare only very basally, cell CuP is entirely microtri-
chose and yellow abdominal fasciae are broader than
in C. bicornutum. Moreover, C. bicornutum has no
process on terga 7 and 8.
Remarks: Species known only from the holotype male.
This species is placed in two positions in the identi-
fication key because the bare area of the wing is
small, and may be misinterpreted.
Holotype male deposited in the Illinois Natural
History Survey (Champaign, Illinois, USA) and
labelled: ‘NEW CALEDONIA/Mt Khogis, 500 m/
17 km NNE Nouméa/30–31 Oct. 1992/MEIrwin,
DWWebb’ ‘Malaise Trap/in tropical/forest’ ‘Illinois
Nat. Hist. Survey’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/
asombrosum/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and
third lines handwritten].
Type locality: New Caledonia: South Province,
Nouméa, Mount Koghi (also spelled Koghis), 500 m,
22°12S, 166°30E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above.
CITROGRAMMA AUSTRALE THOMPSON SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with small facial tubercle, yellow
with medial thin dark vitta, from oral apex to anten-
nal base, narrower than yellow lateral areas of face,
yellow pilose; gena yellow, yellow pilose, white polli-
nose posteriorly; lunule yellow; holoptic; frontal tri-
angle yellow, black pilose; vertical triangle black, a
bit shorter than eye contiguity, black pilose; ocelli
reddish; antenna dark yellowish, black pilose on
scape and pedicel; basoflagellomere orangish, dark
dorsally; arista dark; occiput black, silver pollinose,
golden pollinose dorsally, pale pilose on ventral two
thirds, dark pilose on dorsal third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial grey
pollinose area with metallic iridescence forming two
anteroposterior vittae (see variation), with a lateral
broad yellow vitta, black pilose dorsally, yellow
pilose laterally on yellow vitta, densely yellowish
pilose on lateral notopleuron and supra-alar area;
postpronotum yellow, notopleuron yellow continuing
until scutellum, with postalar callus entirely yellow,
black and yellow pilose; scutellum yellow laterally
and anteriorly with dorsomedial semicircular
defined brown macula not reaching anterior margin,
black pilose, with a sparse subscutellar fringe with
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 129
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
black hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except posterior
anepisternum black on anterior half and dorsally,
katepisternum black with dorsal yellow macula,
meron black, anterior anepimeron black, katater-
gum black posteriorly, entirely yellow pilose; metast-
ernum pilose; ventral calypter yellow with yellow
hairs on margin, dorsal calypter yellow, darkened
anterodistally; plumula yellow; halter pedicel yellow
with capitulum brown; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brown, entirely microtrichose.
Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than costal cell
and slightly broader than cell BM.
Legs: Pro- and metacoxa and trochanter yellow, meso-
coxa and mesotrochanter brownish yellow; profemur
and tibia yellow; mesofemur yellow, brownish on
distal one fifth or less; pro- and mesobasotarsomere
yellow brown basally, dark distally, rest of tarsi black;
metafemur, metatibia, and metatarsi black, metafe-
mur brownish only very basally with short, strong,
rather setulose, anteroventral and posteroventral
hairs near apex. Legs black pilose with yellow hairs
on coxae.
Abdomen: Figure 22. Parallel-sided, slightly mar-
gined on terga 4 and 5. Dorsum mainly black, black
pilose dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow
pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally
on anterobasal half; tergum 1 black, yellow laterally;
tergum 2 black with two mesolateral triangular
yellow maculae, yellow lateral margin on anterior
half; terga 3 and 4 black with a medial broad (about
half of the tergum length) yellow fascia with anterior
margin parallel to tergal margin and posterior
margin concave; tergum 5 similar to 3 and 4, black
with medial yellow fascia narrowed dorsomedially;
terga 2, 3, 4, and 5 with a posterior narrow pollinose
fascia on posterior margin; sterna yellow, sterna 1
and 2 yellow pilose, everywhere else black pilose;
genital segments brownish; male genitalia large
reaching posterior margin of sternum 4, sternum 5
modified to accommodate it, brown, as in Figures 138
and 139.
Female: Unknown (but see comments under
C. notiale).
Variation: The two studied males differ in the grey
pollinose area on dorsal scutum. The scutum of the
paratype has no clear evidence of the metallic irides-
cence and looks like a black scutum with grey or black
pollinosity, probably because it was wetted. The holo-
type has this metallic iridescence but because of the
pin, it is not clear if the grey central pollinose area is
undivided like C. robertsi, or divided into two vittae,
like C. notiale.
Length (N =2): Body, 8.0–8.3 (8.2) mm; wing, 7.0–7.5
(7.3) mm.
Geographical distribution: Australia.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Latin australis meaning austral, southern (Brown,
1956: 112). It refers to the type locality of the species,
very south in the genus distribution and from Aus-
tralia. Species epithet to be treated as an adjective.
Differential diagnosis: Species difficult to distinguish
from C. notiale and found in the same region (Sydney
and Brisbane, Australia). Males of these two species
can be distinguished only using genitalia. Very differ-
ent species from the rest with a medial black facial
vitta, wing completely microtrichose, and scutellum
with a dark medial macula not reaching anterior
margin. The abdomen is almost parallel-sided with
tergum 2 with two subtriangular yellow maculae, and
a broad yellow fascia on terga 3, 4, and 5 (Fig. 22).
Remarks: The male genitalia of the paratype (Mt
Glorious, 8.xi.1969) are broken in multiple parts,
but the singular lingula that this species has can be
seen in one of these fragments. The other paratype
also has the lingula broken. Only four Citrogra-
mma species have lingula present in the male
genitalia: C. australe,C. notiale,C. asombrosum, and
C. quadricornutum.
Holotype male deposited in the Australian National
Insect Collection, CSIRO (Canberra, Australia)
and labelled: ‘?BRISBANE,/Q’land/C. F. Ashby’
‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/australe/det. X. Mengual
2009’ [red, second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Australia: Queensland, Brisbane,
27°28S, 153°01E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.A
USTRALIA: Brisbane, Queensland,
C.F. Ashby [1, ANIC];..., Mt Glorious, 8.xi.1969,
J.K. Guyomar [1, ANIC].
CITROGRAMMA BICORNUTUM VOCKEROTH, 1969
Citrogramma bicornutum Vockeroth, 1969: 98. Holo-
type: , BPBM, by original designation. Type locality:
Papua New Guinea: Daulo Pass. Vockeroth, 1969: 98,
fig. 95. Thompson & Vockeroth, 1989: 442; Wyatt,
1991: 155, 156.
130 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Differential diagnosis: Very distinct species with a
medial black facial vitta, cell BM bare on basal half,
and abdominal terga 3 and 4 each with a narrow
yellow fascia (Figs 15, 16). Similar to C. asombrosum,
but they differ in male genitalia, abdominal pattern
(C. asombrosum has a broad yellow fascia on terga 3
and 4) and geographical distribution (C. asombrosum
is only known from New Caledonia).
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA: NE,/Daulo Pass,/2500 m, V–2–1959’
‘C.D. Michener/Collector/BISHOP’ ‘HOLOTYPE/
Citrogramma/bicornutum/Vockeroth’ [red, handwrit-
ten except first line].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Eastern Highlands
Province, Daulo District, Daulo Pass, 2500 m, 6°01S,
145°12E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: (NE) Morobe
Province, Wau, 1200 m, 5.x.1962, J. Sedlacek, Malaise
trap [11, BPBM]; (NE) 6 km W of Wau, Nami
Creek, 1700 m, 15.vi.1962, Malaise trap, J. Sedlacek
[1, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA CHOLA GHORPADÉ, 1994
Citrogramma chola Ghorpadé, 1994: 9. Holotype: ,
USNM, by original designation. Type locality: India:
Nandi Hills.
Citrogramma sp. A of Wyatt 1991: 157, 166.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose ventrally, mainly yellow with
some black hairs on medial section, black pilose dor-
sally and laterally; gena yellow, dark pilose medially,
yellow pilose posteriorly, white pollinose posteriorly;
lunule dark, black area forming semicircular area;
holoptic; frontal triangle yellow, black pilose; vertical
triangle black, small, shorter than eye contiguity
(1:1.3), black pilose; ocelli reddish; antenna dark,
scape brownish, pedicel black, scape and pedicel black
pilose; basoflagellomere orangish, dark dorsally, oval;
arista black; occiput black, silver pollinose, pale pilose
on ventral half, golden yellow pilose on dorsal half
(Fig. 81).
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose with a metallic blue irides-
cence, mainly black pilose dorsally with some yellow
hairs, with a lateral yellow vitta; postpronotum
yellow; notopleuron yellow, orangish pilose with black
hairs posterolaterally; yellow vitta continuing until
scutellum, supra-alar area orangish yellow and black
pilose; postalar callus entirely yellow, mainly black
pilose; scutellum bright yellow with a dorsomedial
small diffuse light brown macula, black pilose, with a
complete subscutellar fringe with dark hairs. Pleuron
mostly yellow (Fig. 80), except katepisternum black
with dorsal yellow macula, meron black, posterior
anepisternum yellow with black vertical macula on
anterior third, entirely orangish yellow pilose;
metasternum pilose; ventral calypter yellow with long
yellowish hairs on margin, dorsal calypter yellow
basally and blackened distally with short black hairs
on margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular
fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane light brown, entirely microt-
richose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Procoxa yellow, dark basally; protrochanter
brown; mesocoxa and mesotrochanter brownish;
metacoxa and metatrochanter yellowish brown; pro-
and mesofemur yellow, mainly black pilose with
yellow hairs; metafemur yellowish on basal half, dark
on distal half, mainly black pilose with yellow hairs;
pro- and mesotibia yellow, black pilose; metatibia
black, black pilose; tarsi black, black pilose dorsolat-
erally and golden pilose ventrolaterally.
Abdomen: Figure 83. Parallel-sided, slightly oval;
terga 3, 4, and 5 margined. Dorsum mainly black,
black pilose dorsally and laterally except tergum 1
yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose
laterally on anterobasal quarter and on dorsal yellow
maculae; tergum 1 black, brownish anteriorly, yellow
laterally; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral broad
yellow maculae very narrowed laterally and extend-
ing forward to anterolateral tergal margin, yellow
lateral margin on anterior third; terga 3, 4, and 5
black with an anterior broad yellow fascia markedly
emarginate posteriorly and narrowed to lateral
margins, with a narrow black fascia on anterior
margin; lateral margins partially yellow: one quarter
to one third on tergum 3, half on tergum 4 and almost
the entire lateral margin on tergum 5; sterna yellow,
black pilose; genital segments yellowish; male geni-
talia as in Figures 127 and 130.
Female: Similar to male except normal sexual dimor-
phism and as follows: frons yellow with medial trian-
gular brown macula towards ocellar triangle not
reaching posterior black area, black lateral margin on
posterior half (Fig. 82); posterior section of ane-
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 131
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
pimeron dark; abdominal fasciae narrower without
emargination, tergum 4 with yellow fascia very
sinuate medially (Fig. 84).
Variation: One paratype specimen has a small brown-
ish area on facial tubercle that looks like a medial
vitta but does not reach the antennal base. The yellow
portion of lateral margin of abdominal terga varies
slightly. Some individuals have yellow pollinosity
on anepisternum and posterior anepisternum, and
they can look completely shiny yellow. Females can
present frons yellowish, with a very diffuse brownish
triangular macula not present in the lightest speci-
men. This specimen lacks medial brownish macula on
scutellum.
There is a female [India, P.S. Nathan, Frank M.
Hull collection C.N.C. 1973 (CNC)] with the metast-
ernum bare, probably hairs were rubbed off. The
specimen is in very bad condition, laterally com-
pressed, missing some legs. There is another female
specimen with the metasternum bare deposited at
RMNH.
Length (N =5): Body, 9.5–11.0 (10.3) mm; wing, 8.5–
9.2 (8.9) mm.
Geographical distribution: India.
Differential diagnosis: Species very similar to C. citri-
num, but with anepisternum yellow, different shape
of abdominal fasciae and the macula of katepister-
num usually connected with the yellow area of the
anterior anepisternum. Citrogramma citrinum has
anepisternum black, and the dorsal yellow macula on
katepisternum does not reach the yellow anterior
anepisternum (Figs 80, 88). Females of C. citrinum
have frons completely yellow; meanwhile females of
C. chola have a medial diffuse triangular brown
macula (Fig. 86).
Etymology: The species name is based on the Chola
Dynasty, which, in historical times, ruled the area
now known as northern Tamil Nadu, where the Palni
Hills lie, in the old Madura country. Species epithet to
be treated as a noun in apposition.
Remarks: Ghorpadé (1994) mentioned that C. flavige-
num Wyatt, 1991 would key out to C. chola Ghorpadé,
1994 in his key. The most evident difference is the
coloration of legs and anepimeron, with pro- and
mesofemur black basally and metafemur entirely
black in C. flavigenum. Ghorpadé (1994) also
explained that Citrogramma sp. A of Wyatt (1991)
was C. chola. Ghorpadé and I think that C. flavige-
num and C. chola could be the same species. Both
taxa are similar and sympatric, collected on the same
dates at the same location, but they can be distin-
guished perfectly by anepimeron, lunule, and metafe-
mur coloration. Characters based on coloration can
be variable, but only two specimens of almost 100
studied were difficult to identify, and male genitalia
show no differences between these species. In this
revision, I prefer to keep these two taxa tentatively
separate, pending other sources of information such
as DNA or larval morphology, which may help clarify
the species status.
Wyatt (1991) defined Citrogramma sp. A with bare
metasternum in the couplet 10 of his key, but Ghor-
padé (1994) clarified that this species possesses
metasternal hairs. I reviewed the specimen studied
by Wyatt (deposited at BMNH) and it does have
metasternum pilose.
Holotype male deposited in the National Museum
of Natural History (Washington D.C., USA) and
labelled: ‘INDIA: Karnataka/Nandi Hills 1467 m/
27.vii.1975/Ghorpade No. A207’ ‘GHORPADE/
COLLECTION/Bangalore’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogra-
mma/chola/Ghorpade 1994’ [red, second and third
lines handwritten].
Type locality: India: Karnataka State, Chikkaballapur
District, Nandi Hills, 1467 m, 13°22N, 77°40E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.I
NDIA: P.S. Nathan [2, CNC]; Kar-
nataka, Nandi Hills, 1467 m, 27.vii.1975, K.D. Ghor-
padé No. A207 [11, USNM]; Kerala, Kaikatty,
937 m, 1.i.1974, K.D. Ghorpadé No. A77 [1, USNM];
Tamil Nadu, Ootacamund, 2350 m, 23.x.1975, K.D.
Ghorpadé No. A254 [1, USNM; 1, CNC]; Kodai-
kanal, Pulney Hills, 6500 ft, iv.1953, P.S. Nathan
[1, CNC]; . . . , xi.1953, P.S. Nathan [1,
AMNH];..., 2250 m, 31.x.1975, K.D. Ghorpadé No.
A259 [1, BMNH].
Nontype material. INDIA: Arunachal Pradesh, Tirap
Dist., Hornbill Camp, 2000 ft, 8.xii.1981, M.L. Ripley
[1, USNM]; Karnataka, Nandi Hills, 1467 m,
27.vii.1975, K.D. Ghorpadé No. A207 [3, USNM];
Tamil Nadu, Ootacamund, 2350 m, 23.x.1975, K.D.
Ghorpadé No. A254 [24, USNM];...,21.x.1975,
K.D. Ghorpadé No. A251 [13, USNM]; Tamil
Nadu, Palani Hills, Sowrikadu, 1000 m, v.1978, T.R.
Susai Nathan [1, ZMAN]; Tamil Nadu, Kookal,
2000 m, 19.xi.2006, K. Ghorpade D592 [815,
USNM];..., 29.xii.2007, K. Ghorpade D592 [1,
USNM]; Tamil Nadu, Kodaikanal, 2150 m,
28.ix.1985, K.D. Ghorpadé No. B420 [1, USNM];
Tamil Nadu, Kookal sholah, 2000 m, 24–25.x.2006, K.
Ghorpade D577 [1, USNM]; Tamil Nadu, Glenmor-
gan, 2000 m, 1.ix.1991, K. Ghorpade [1, USNM];
Kerala, Munnar, Top Station, 28.xi.2002, K. Ghorpadé
D309 [1, USNM]; Anamalai Hills, Cinchona,
132 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
3500 ft, v.1969, T.R. Susai Nathan [1, ZMAN];
Aruchanal Hills, 3500 ft, v.1960 ‘Museum Leiden Col-
lectie Van Doesburg rec. 1973’ [1, RMNH].
CITROGRAMMA CIRCUMDATUM (DE MEIJERE, 1908)
Syrphus circumdatus de Meijere, 1908: 306. Lecto-
type: , ZMAN, here designated. Type locality: Papua
New Guinea: Moroka. de Meijere, 1908: 306, fig. 35,
1914: 157; Hervé-Bazin, 1923a: 25; Curran, 1931a:
312, 1931b: 350 (in part).
Olbiosyrphus circumdatus of Hervé-Bazin, 1926:
67; Frey, 1946: 163.
Citrogramma circumdatum of Knutson et al., 1975:
311 (in part); Thompson & Vockeroth, 1989: 442.
Citrogramma circumdata of Wyatt, 1991: 155, 157,
162, fig. 7.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea. Curran
(1931b) identified a female from Mt Kinabalu as
Syrphus circumdatus that Knutson et al. (1975) also
cited. This female is here identified as C. hervebazini
(Curran, 1928).
Differential diagnosis: Species with a distinct scutum
pattern: lateral yellow vitta narrowed ventrally on
notopleuron and supra-alar area with a lateral black
macula (Figs 35, 36). Citrogramma circumdatum
has a medial black facial vitta, scutellum with a
medial black macula, pro- and mesofemur mainly
yellow and katepisternum with a dorsal large yellow
macula.
Remarks: de Meijere (1908) based his new species
on a series of three males and two females from
Moroka (New Guinea) collected by Loria, but he did
not designate a holotype in his work. de Jong (2000)
explained that the syntypes from MSNG (=MCSN)
were lost in HNHM in 1956, but he did not mention
how many specimens were in MSNG. Recently, I
examined a specimen received from Ghorpadé, a
borrowed male labelled: ‘N. GUINEA S.E./Moroka,
1300 m./LORIA VII–XI 93’ ‘Museo
Civ. Genova’ ‘MCSNG’ ‘Citrogramma/pendleburyi/
(CURRAN)/K.D. Ghorpade det. 1983’ [second and
third lines handwritten]. The specimen is in very
bad condition: without wings, with only two legs
and the head and the abdomen glued on a label.
This male specimen is labelled as a paralectotype
and deposited in MSNG.
Amongst the examined syntypes (a male and a
female) deposited at the Zoölogisch Museum Amster-
dam (Universiteit van Amsterdam, the Netherlands),
there is a pinned male labelled ‘N. Guinea S.E.,
Moroka 1300 m., Loria, vii–xi.93’ ‘Museo Civ. Genova’
Syrphus circumdatus det. de Meijere’ (italics =
handwritten text) ‘Syrphus circumdatus de Meijere,
1908 ZMAN type DIPT.0970.1’. This specimen is here
designated lectotype to fix and ensure the universal
and consistent interpretation of the name. The other
syntype (‘Syrphus circumdatus de Meijere, 1908
ZMAN type DIPT.0970.2’) has been labelled as a
paralectotype.
Lectotype male deposited in the Zoölogisch Museum
Amsterdam (Universiteit van Amsterdam, the Neth-
erlands) and labelled: ‘N. Guinea S.E., Moroka
1300 m., Loria, vii–xi.93’ ‘Museo Civ. Genova’ ‘Syrphus
circumdatus det. de Meijere’ (italics =handwritten
text) ‘Syrphus circumdatus de Meijere, 1908 ZMAN
type DIPT.0970.1’ ‘LECTOTYPE/Citrogramma/
circumdatum/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and
third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Central Province,
Moroka (09°25S, 147°41,E), circa 1300 m above sea
level. Loria’s collecting locality ‘Moroka’ was located
by Thomas (1897: 607) amongst the mountains
behind the Astrolabe Range, near Mt Wori–Wori. Tate
(1940: 2) placed it at the ‘headwaters of the Musgrave
River’. Later, Laurie & Hill (1954: 151) gave the
coordinates of this locality as ‘09°24S, 147°32E’.
Loria’s specimen labels quote the elevation of Moroka
as ‘1300 m’. Tags on the Genova specimens identify
this locality with the ‘Bartholomew Range’. ‘Mt Wori-
Wori’ is today referenced as ‘Vori Vori Bluff’ (A.
Allison, unpubl. data) [extracted from Helgen et al.,
2008]. de Jong (2000) gave slightly different coordi-
nates, 09°25S, 147°35E.
Material examined: Type material. Lectotype, as
above. Paralectotypes. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: New
Guinea S.E., Moroka 1300 m, Loria, vii–xi.1893 [1,
ZMAN; 1, MSNG].
Nontype material. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Wau,
Nakata Ridge, 4700 ft, 9.vi.1968, J.W. Boyes (Boyes
Cytolog. Coll. #790, 793, 796, 798, 799, 800, 802) [5
3, CNC];...,11.vi.1968, J.W. Boyes (Boyes Cytolog.
Coll. #808) [65, CNC]; Morobe Prov., near Wau,
Mt Kaindi, 1200–1440 m, 24.viii.1983, S.E. & P.M.
Miller [1, USNM]; (NE) Morobe Province, Wau,
1700 m, 18.v.1969, Malaise trap, J. Sedlacek
[1, BPBM];..., 1250 m, 3.viii.1964,...[1,
BPBM];..., 1200 m, 10.v.1963,...[31,
BPBM];..., 1–10.v.1963,...[23, BPBM]; . . . ,
5.x.1962,...[2, BPBM];..., 17.ix.1961, J. Sed-
lacek [1, BPBM];...,15.viii.1961, Malaise trap, J.
& M. Sedlacek [2, BPBM];..., 17.iii.1965,...
[1, BPBM]; . . . , 1750 m, 23.viii.1965,...[11,
BPBM];..., 1250 m, 12.viii.1965,...[1,
BPBM];..., 25.viii.1965,...[1, BPBM]; . . . ,
1300 m, 25.vi.1961, J. Sedlacek [1, BPBM];
..., 1150m, 17.ix.1962, J. Sedlacek [1,
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 133
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
BPBM];...,1500 m, 24.ix.1961, J. Sedlacek [11,
BPBM];..., 1700 m, 16–19.v.1962, J. Sedlacek
[1, BPBM];..., 1100–1300 m.i.1966, J. Sedlacek
[1, BPBM];...,1400 m, 20.xii.1961, J. & J.H. Sed-
lacek [2, BPBM];..., 1150m, viii.1971, M. Sed-
lacek [1, BPBM];..., Edie Creek, 200 m,
5–11.x.1961, Malaise trap, J. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM];...,Kunai Ck., 1250 m, 26.viii.1963, Malaise
trap, J. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; (NE) 6 km W of Wau,
Nami Creek, 1700 m, 10.vi.1962, J. Sedlacek [17,
BPBM]; (NE) Nami Creek, 10.vi.1962, J. & M. Sed-
lacek [22, BPBM]; (NE) Mt Kaindi, 2350 m,
19.vii.1971, M. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; (NE) Mt
Kaindi, 1300–1400 m, vi.1968, N.L.H. Krauss [1,
BPBM]; NE. Feramin, 150–120 m, 1–6.vi.1959, W.W.
Brandt [2, BPBM]; Bulolo, Manki Logging Area,
7.vii.1983, H. Roberts [1, BMNH];...,
14.vi.1983,...[11, BMNH]; Bulolo, F.H. Taylor
[1, ANIC].
CITROGRAMMA CITRINOIDES WYATT, 1991
Citrogramma citrinoides Wyatt, 1991: 158. Holotype:
, BMNH, by original designation. Type locality:
Malaysia: Mt Jasar. Wyatt, 1991: 158, figs 6 and 14.
Syrphus variscutatus of Curran, 1928 (in part).
Geographical distribution: Malay Peninsula (Pahang),
Hainan.
Differential diagnosis: Distinct species only known
from male specimens. Face yellow, lunule yellow,
scutellum yellow, metafemur black and pro- and
mesofemur yellow. Very similar to C. flavigenum but
C. flavigenum with lunule black, brown macula on
facial tubercle, and pro- and mesofemur black basally;
both species yellow pilose on notopleuron and on
supra-alar area, but C. citrinoides has little black
hairs. Citrogramma flavigenum is only known from
southern India.
Remarks: Little variation was found in the type series
and nontype material. The most evident is tergum 3
usually with a yellow fascia with parallel margins,
but some specimens have this fascia slightly emar-
ginate posteromedially (Fig. 90). After the study of
the type material, I realised that some individuals
have pro- and mesofemur with a posterobasal brown-
ish area, but entirely yellow anterobasally. This only
posterior diffuse macula is very distinct from the
other character state used in couplet 40 of the key:
pro- and mesofemur black basally.
A male was found labelled as paratype and not
noted in the original description (Malaysia, Pahang,
Cameron Highlands, 5000–5500 ft, 12.vi.1935, H.M.
Pendlebury, BMNH). The paratype male collected on
22.ix.1938 has a head glued on of a different syrphid
genus, Allograpta Osten Sacken, 1875.
As mentioned by Wyatt (1991), there are some
individuals that were identified as paratype or para-
lectotype of C. variscutatum (Curran, 1928). They are
placed in the nontype material.
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘PAHANG, F.M.S./
Cameron Highlands/G. Jasar 5500 ft./256–1935
‘H.M. Pendlebury./Coll./F.M.S. Museums.’ [back of
the label] ‘Ex F.M.S./Museum./B.M. 1955–354’
‘HOLO–/TYPE’ [round red label] ‘HOLOTYPE
of/Citrogramma/citrinoides n. sp./det. N.P. Wyatt
1989’[1, BMNH].
Type locality: Malaysia: Pahang, Cameron Highlands,
Mount Jasar, 1676 m, 4°30N, 101°30E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.M
ALAYSIA: Pahang, Cameron High-
lands, 4800 ft, 26.vi.1935, H.M. Pendlebury [1,
BMNH];..., 5000–5500 ft, 12.vi.1935, . . . [1,
BMNH];..., 4000–4500 ft, 21.vi.1935, . . .
[1, BMNH]; Pahang, Cameron Highlands, Mount
Jasar, 5500 ft, 25.vi.1935, H.M. Pendlebury [3,
BMNH];..., 5565 ft, 13.xii.1939, . . .
[1, BMNH];..., 5565 ft, 22.ix.1938,...[1,
BMNH];..., 5565 ft, 19.v.1939,...[1, BMNH];
Pahang, Fraser’s Hill, Fine Tree Hill, 4600 ft,
3.ix.1933, H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH].
Nontype material. MALAYSIA: Pahang, Mount
Tahan, 6500–7100 ft, 13.xii.1921, H.M. Pendlebury
[1, BMNH];...‘Paratype Syrphus variscutatus
Curran’ [2, BMNH];..., 12.xii.1921,...‘Paratype
Syrphus variscutatus Curran’ [1, BMNH]; ...,
14.xii.1921,...‘Paratype Syrphus variscutatus
Curran’ [1, BMNH];..., Seat Point, 5460 ft,
17.i.1923, H.M. Pendlebury ‘Paratype Syrphus varis-
cutatus Curran’ [1, BMNH];..., Seat Point,
5960 ft, 3.i.1923, H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH];
Pahang, Cameron Highlands, 4800–5500 ft, 8.vi.1935,
H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH]; Pahang, Fraser’s Hill,
4200 ft, 7.vii.1931, H.M. Pendlebury [1, AMNH];
Pahang, Gunung Kechan, 6300 ft, 23.i.1923, H.M.
Pendlebury ‘Paratype Syrphus variscutatus Curran’
[1, AMNH]; Pahang, Brinchang, 34.xi–2.xii.1977, B.
Bendell [1, CNC]; CHINA: Hainan, Ledong County,
jianfengling, 16.xi.2006, Ke–Ke Huo [2, SBSC]
(Huo, unpubl. data).
CITROGRAMMA CITRINUM (BRUNETTI, 1923)
Xanthogramma citrinum Brunetti, 1923: 95. Holo-
type: , NZSI, by original designation. Type locality:
134 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
India: Mangaldai. Brunetti, 1923: 95, fig. 20; Shiraki,
1930: 405, 408; Nayar & Nayar, 1965: 241; Biswas
et al., 1975: 25.
Olbiosyrphus citrinus of Hervé-Bazin, 1923b: 290,
1926: 67; Frey, 1946: 163.
Syrphus citrinum of Curran, 1928: 198, 214, 1931a:
313, 319, 1942: 6.
Citrogramma citrinum of Knutson et al.,1975: 311
(in part is C. henryi); Kapoor et al., 1979: 52; Wyatt,
1991: 158, 163, fig. 13; Sun, 1992: 136; Ghorpadé,
1994: 9; Mitra et al., 2008: 3; Yang et al., 1998: 1106.
Geographical distribution: China, Thailand, India,
Malay Peninsula (Pahang, Perak).
Differential diagnosis: Species with face entirely
yellow (Fig. 87), posterior anepisternum black anteri-
orly (Fig. 88), scutellum with a diffused brownish
macula (Fig. 85) and metafemur yellow on basal third
to half. Citrogramma citrinum is similar to C. chola,
whose males have the frontal triangle narrow with an
angle between eyes under 90°. The differences from
C. chola are that C. citrinum has notopleuron entirely
yellow pilose and anepimeron black. Males of C. citri-
num have frontal triangle with a medial brownish
orange macula (Fig. 87), abdominal tergum 3 with a
yellow fascia with subparallel margins and slightly
emarginate posteriorly, and tergum 4 with a yellow
fascia with subparallel posterior margin to posterior
tergal margin (Fig. 85). Females of C. citrinum have
lunule yellow (Fig. 86), frons yellow medially and
tergum 4 with a yellow fascia slightly widening to
lateral margins; whereas females of C. chola have
frons yellow with an anteromedial dark triangular
macula and lunule dark (Fig. 82).
Remarks: Only one female specimen was studied
from Larut Hills, Perak, Malaysia. Brunetti (1923)
described the female of C. citrinum based on two
specimens: ‘Ghumti, Darjiling District, 4000 ft.,
vii.1911, type (Gravely)’ and ‘Sidapur, Coorg, S.
India, 8000 ft., 15.iii.1917’. The main difference with
the male individuals was the pleuron pattern, entirely
yellow with katepisternum black ventrally. Wyatt
(1991) suggested that males and females were wrongly
associated in the original description and that Brunetti
based his species in two different taxa. The studied
female has pleuron mostly yellow except posterior
anepisternum black on anterior third and katepister-
num black medial and ventrally. The female of C. citri-
num is very similar to females of C. chola and it also
has black hairs on posterolateral notopleuron (males of
C. citrinum do not). Another difference between these
females is that C. citrinum has anterior anepimeron
black pilose but C. chola has anepimeron entirely
yellow pilose. See also remarks under C. chola.
Brunetti (1923) cited a male from Janakmukh
(Abor Expedition) from the Zoological Survey of India
(NZSI), and considered it probably to be a distinct
species with a medial black facial vitta and metaleg
entirely black. Wyatt (1991) did not contradict this
possibility, and I think it is likely to be true and that
this specimen could key out to Citrogramma marissa
Mengual sp. nov.
Sun (1992) and Yang et al. (1998) cited C. citrinum
from Yunnan, Fujian, and Sichuan provinces of
China. I have not studied any specimen of C. citrinum
from China.
Keiser (1958) studied Citrogramma specimens from
several localities of Sri Lanka that he identified as
X. citrinum. These specimens must be C. henryi Ghor-
padé, 1994 (K. Ghorpadé pers. comm.) because it is
the only studied species that occurs on that island.
Similarly, Vockeroth (1969) cited C. citrinum from Sri
Lanka, and figured the male genitalia. Although not
major differences in male genitalia are present
between these species, the male genitalia in Vocker-
oth (1969: fig. 57) are that of C. henryi because he
only studied material of ‘C. citrinum’ from Sri Lanka,
and no other Citrogramma species is known from that
island.
Brunetti (1923: 97) based his species on a series of
three males and two females in the Indian Museum
(NZSI, Calcutta, West Bengal, India) and one male in
the Pusa collection (IARI, New Delhi, India). Brunetti
also mentioned the following information about the
holotype and allotype: ‘Mangaldai, Assam–Bhutan
Frontier, 26.xii.1910, type (Kemp)’ and ‘Ghumti,
Darjiling District, 4000 ft., vii.1911, type (Gravely)’.
Original type material was not available for the
present study.
Holotype male deposited in the National Zoological
Collection, Zoological Survey of India (Calcutta,
India) and labelled: ‘Assam–Bhutan Frontier/
Mangaldai dist., N.E., 26.xii.10/S.W. Kemp’ ‘Xantho.
citrina/Brun Type ’ ‘TYPE’ ‘2286/H2’ ‘Xantho. citri-
num Brun/Type /det. Brun. 1923’‘Citrogramma
citrinum (Brunetti)/K.D. Ghorpade det.1981’.
Type locality: India: Assam State, Darrang District,
Mangaldai (also spelt as Mangaldoi), 26°25N,
90°00E.
Material examined: Nontype material. MALAYSIA:
Perak F.M.S., Larut Hills, 3700–4500 ft, 12.ii.1932,
H.M. Pendlebury [1, USNM; 3, AMNH]; . . . ,
13.ii.1932,...[2, AMNH];..., 14.ii.1932,...[2,
AMNH];..., 17.ii.1932,...[3, USNM; 1,
AMNH]; Perak, Taiping, Gunung Hijau, 1430 m, H.
Bänzinger [3, BMNH]; Pahang, Fraser’s Hill, 27.x–
3.xi.1977, B. Bendell [7, CNC];..., 4200ft,
14.vii.1936, H.M. Pendlebury [4, BMNH]; ...,
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 135
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
3300ft, 30.ix.1932,...[1, BMNH]; Pahang, F.M.S.
Cameron’s Highlands, Rhododendron Hill, 22.vi.1923,
H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH; 1, AMNH];...,
5200 ft, 18.vi.1923,...[1, BMNH]; THAILAND:
Chiang Mai, 20.x.1920, F.4558 acc:22628 [2,
AMNH]; CHINA: Hainan, Ledong County, jianfen-
gling, 16.xi.2006, Ke-Ke Huo [1, SBSC] (Huo,
unpubl. data); Hainan, Wuzhishan City, Shuiman
Town, 23–25.v.2007, Yi-Bi Ba & Jun-Tong Lang [1,
SBSC] (Huo, unpubl. data).
CITROGRAMMA CLARUM (HERVÉ-BAZIN, 1923)
Olbiosyrphus clarus Hervé-Bazin, 1923a: 25. Lecto-
type: , MNHN, here designated. Type locality:
Vietnam: Chapa, here restricted by lectotype designa-
tion. Hervé-Bazin, 1923a: 25, 1923b: 290, 1926: 67,
figs 1, 2, and 3. Frey 1946: 163.
Syrphus clarus of Curran, 1928: 198, 1931a: 313,
1931b: 350.
Xanthogramma fasciatum Shiraki, 1930: 410 syn.
nov. Shiraki, 1930: 402, 410, fig. 94; Hull, 1949: 290.
Citrogramma clarum of Vockeroth, 1969: 95;
Knutson et al., 1975: 311; Wyatt, 1991: 155, 158;
Ghorpadé, 1994: 9.
Xanthogramma fasciata of Knutson et al., 1975: 320.
Geographical distribution: Vietnam, Thailand, Borneo
(Curran, 1931b; Vockeroth, 1969; Knutson et al.,
1975), Philippines (Frey, 1946; Knutson et al., 1975),
Taiwan, Java, Malay Peninsula (Pahang). Previous
authors cited this species from the Philippines and
Borneo, but I have not studied any specimen from
these localities. Curran (1931b) studied three males
from Mt Kinabalu that he identified as Syrphus
clarus. One of these males is deposited at BMNH and
it is identified here as C. amarilla Mengual sp. nov.
Differential diagnosis: Species very similar to C. sp. B
of Wyatt (1991), but with a different wing microtrichia
pattern (Figs 133, 134). It has the wing microtrichose
except cell R bare on basoanterior half until the furca
of cell R2+3and cell BM with small bare area very
close to anterior margin. Male of C. clarum has a
broad angle between eyes, approximately 115° or
more, and two yellow maculae on tergum 5. Citro-
gramma clarum females have usually a yellow fascia
on abdominal tergum 2 (Fig. 77), and they differ from
the ones of C. amarilla and C. matsumurai by having
small bare wing areas, and from females of C. lutei-
frons and C. chola (immature, light coloured speci-
mens) by no black hairs on notopleuron or supra-alar
area and also with some bare areas in the wing.
Females of C. frederici differ by having frons yellow
with a medial orange macula and pro- and mesotar-
sus dark.
Wyatt (1991) stated in his key that C. clarum has
scutum with a central submetallic area divided into
three distinct vittae. The scutum of C. clarum is
black, with a lateral broad yellow vitta. The central
black scutum has submetallic bluish iridescence with
a sublateral matte black vitta, but the central sub-
metallic area is uniform and not divided into vittae.
Remarks: In his original description, Hervé-Bazin
(1923a) gave a short diagnosis of his new species,
Olbiosyrphus clarus, based on material from Laos,
Tonkin (Vietnam) and Java. In 1926, Hervé-Bazin
redescribed this species, providing more details about
adult morphology and included three figures (habitus,
head, and pleuron), and the type material. His illus-
trations showed perfectly the abdominal pattern and
coloration of legs, pleuron pattern, and, the most
diagnostic character, the angle between eyes (Fig. 74).
He designated a male type from Chapa, Tonkin
(now Vietnam) collected on 8.vi.1916, and designated
a male cotype from the same location (Chapa,
11.vii.1918) and three more male cotypes from Laos
(Louang-Prabang, 12.ii.1915; Nan-Long, 28.iv.1918;
Dang-Hé, 29.iv.1918). He also mentioned in his col-
lection another male from Java in poor condition.
Hervé-Bazin (1926) did not designate a holotype.
Amongst the type material at the Muséum National
d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France), there is a male
labelled: ‘Chapa/8616’ [handwritten] ‘Olbiosyrphus/
clarus/Hervé-Bazin/Type ’ [blue, handwritten]
‘LECTOTYPE/Citrogramma/clarum/det. X. Mengual
2010’ [second and third lines handwritten]. This
specimen is here designated lectotype to fix and
ensure the universal and consistent interpretation of
the name. The name of the collector is not written on
any label, but in his paper, Hervé-Bazin (1923a)
pointed out that all specimens were collected by M.R.
Vitalis de Salvaza.
At the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle
(Paris, France), are the type specimen from Chapa
(=Sa Pa) collected on 8.vii.1916, plus three more
males from Nan-Long, Dang-Hé and Java. The other
two males from Chapa (11.vii.1918) and Louang-
Prabang were not found. From this type series, only
the currently designated lectotype male from Chapa
(8.vii.1916) is truly C. clarum, matching the original
description and illustrations of Hervé-Bazin. The
other three males key out to C. amarilla Mengual sp.
nov.
Xanthogramma fasciatum was described by Shiraki
originally from Taiwan based on a single female and
male (Shiraki, 1930). After the study of the type
material, there is no doubt that these specimens
belong to the genus Citrogramma based on head
morphology, scutellar fringe, and pilose metasternum.
The type material of X. fasciatum Shiraki and
136 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
C. clarum (Hervé-Bazin) do not have morphological
differences. Thus, I synonymize here X. fasciatum
with C. clarum following the Principle of Priority
(Article 23 of ICZN, 1999).
Type locality: Vietnam: Lao Cai Province (in Vietnam-
ese, Lào Cai), Sa Pa District (Sapa, English spelling),
Sa Pa (also spelt Chapa), 22°20N, 103°50E.
Material examined: Type material. Lectotype, as
above.
Nontype material. TAIWAN: Rakuraku, 11.ix.1924.
T. Shiraki, J. Sonan. ‘Xanthogramma fasciatum n. sp.
Det. T. Shiraki’, ‘Type’ [1, NIAS]; Kosempo, i.1918,
Col. T. Shiraki. ‘Xanthogramma fasciatum n. sp. Det.
T. Shiraki’, ‘Type’ [1, NIAS]; THAILAND [as Siam]:
Ban Pa Pae, 770 m, 23.xii.1932, Hugh M. Smith [2
4, USNM]; INDONESIA: Java, Gunung Bentang,
iii.1938, E. le Moult [1, BMNH]; MALAYSIA: Pahang,
Cameron Highlands, Rhododendron Hill, 5200 ft,
19.vi.1923, H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH].
CITROGRAMMA CURRANI GHORPADÉ SP.NOV.
Citrogramma sp. D of Wyatt, 1991: 167. Wyatt, 1991:
158, 167.
Citrogramma variscutatum of Curran, 1928 (in
part).
Description
The description of C. currani as well as the diagnosis
and the etymology are written by K. Ghorpadé fol-
lowing my style and using my wording, and adapted
to fit in this work. The studied material and remarks
are written by me.
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose; gena yellow, yellow pilose;
lunule yellow; frontal triangle yellow, black pilose;
vertical triangle black, black pilose, golden pollinose
(Fig. 95); antenna orangish brown; basoflagellomere
orangish, dark dorsally; occiput black, silver polli-
nose, entirely yellow pilose.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial grey
pollinose area, with sublateral matte black vitta
and lateral yellow vitta, mainly yellow pilose with
scattered black hairs; notopleuron yellow pilose,
densely yellow pilose on lateral notopleuron and
supra-alar area; postpronotum yellow; notopleuron
yellow continuing until scutellum, with postalar
callus entirely yellow with black hairs; scutellum
yellow with dorsomedial broad sharpened triangular
black macula, black pilose, subscutellar fringe com-
plete with black hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except
posterior anepisternum black on anterior half,
katepisternum black with dorsal yellow macula,
anepimeron black with dorsomedial section yellow,
meron black, katatergum black posteriorly, yellow
pilose; metasternum pilose; calypter yellow basally
and much blackened distally with long black hairs
on margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular
fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane hyaline, entirely microtrichose.
Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter orangish brown, black and
yellow pilose; pro- and mesofemur yellow; pro- and
mesotibia yellow; metafemur yellow on basal half to
three fifths, black on distal half to two fifths; metafe-
mur black; tarsi black.
Abdomen: Figure 101. Parallel-sided; terga 3, 4, and 5
slightly margined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose
dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose
and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal
half; tergum 1 black, yellowish laterally; tergum 2
black with two mesolateral yellow maculae, laterally
extended forward to anterolateral tergal margin and
broadened mesomedially, yellow lateral margin on
anterior half; terga 3 and 4 black with broad, about
half of tergum length, laterally and medially nar-
rowed yellow fascia with anterobasal narrow black
fascia; tergum 5 black with yellow fascia strongly
narrowed medially; sterna mainly yellow, sterna 2–4
black on posterior half, yellow and black pilose; male
genitalia as in Figures 127 and 130.
Female: Similar to male except: frons yellow with
medial triangular black macula towards ocellar tri-
angle reaching or not reaching posterior black area,
with black lateral margin on posterior half and small
black fascia anterior to ocellar triangle (Fig. 97);
lunule dark; anterior anepimeron black only on dorsal
two thirds and posterior anepimeron black on poste-
rior half, leaving basal anepimeron yellow; abdominal
fasciae narrower, about one third of tergum length,
with margins almost parallel to tergal edge and
pointed anteriorly on medial anterior margin
(Fig. 102).
Variation: Some specimens have black areas on
pleuron with grey pollinosity, not visible in the holo-
type specimen. There are two male specimens with
metafemur darker basally probably because of drying
or storage conditions and the basal yellow half of the
metafemur is not well distinguished. The two male
specimens from Vietnam have the scutellar black
macula slightly diffused, but clear. Females have
scutum with a dorsal bluish metallic area and two
dark vittae, not distinct.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 137
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Length (N =5): Body, 10.0–10.8 (10.4) mm; wing, 9.0–
9.9 (9.5) mm.
Geographical distribution: India, Thailand, Hainan,
Vietnam.
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to Charles
Howard Curran (1894–1972), a Canadian entomolo-
gist and dipterist specialist who contributed exten-
sively to descriptive dipterology, naming 2648 true fly
species (see Arnaud & Owen, 1981). The species
epithet to be treated as a masculine patronym.
Differential diagnosis: Species with face yellow, pos-
terior anepisternum partly black, scutellum yellow
with a triangular black macula, pro- and mesofemur
yellow, and metafemur basally yellow. Species very
similar to Citrogramma wyatti Mengual sp. nov., but
without black macula on genal groove (Fig. 99).
Females of C. currani have frons yellow and a black
macula medially, and lunule dark (Fig. 97).
Remarks: Wyatt (1991) mentioned this taxon as Cit-
rogramma sp. D based on a single female from Thai-
land, originally identified as C. variscutatum by
Curran (1928), with metafemur partly yellow as the
diagnostic character. Two other females from India (in
Arunachal Pradesh state, close to Myanmar) that key
out to Citrogramma sp. D were found in the USNM
collection. The two females from India were identical
to the female from Thailand. At the beginning, I
thought that these three females could be variants of
C. wyatti, but there are some important diagnostic
characters of that species that are not present: black
macula on genal groove, coloration of frons and
lunule. As they were all females, I decided to not
describe and name them formally. Later, Ghorpadé
sent me the description and the type material of his
new species from Thailand, C. currani, based only on
male specimens. Soon I realised that these were the
same species. The only confusion about C. currani is
a couple of males with darker metafemur that might
key to C. gedehanum. Both species have very similar
overall morphological characters, especially abdomi-
nal patterns.
Holotype male deposited in the Zoological Museum,
University of Copenhagen (København [ =Copen-
hagen], Denmark) and labelled: ‘THAILAND: Chieng
Mai Province/Doi Suthep, summit/1600 m 27.ix.1981/
Zool. Museum Copenhagen leg.’ ‘UZM’ ‘HOLOTYPE/
Citrogramma/currani/Ghorpadé, 2010/HOLOTYPE’
[pink].
Type locality: Thailand: Chiang Mai Province, Doi
Suthep, 1676 m, 18°4846′′N, 98°5337′′E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.T
HAILAND: Chiang Mai, Doi Suthep,
1600 m, 27.ix.1981, Zool. Museum Copenhagen [6,
ZMUC]; Chiang Mai, 26.x.1920, F.4567 acc:22628
[4, AMNH].
Nontype material. THAILAND: Nakhon Si Thamma-
rat Province, Khao Luang, 2000 ft, 29.iii.1922, H.M.
Pendlebury ‘Paralectotype Citrogramma variscu-
tatum’ [1, BMNH]; CHINA: Hainan, Ledong County,
jianfengling, 16.xi.2006, Ke–Ke Huo [3, SBSC]
(Huo, unpubl. data); INDIA: Arunachal Pradesh, Tirap
District, Hornbill Camp, 2000 ft, 8.xii.1981, M.L.
Ripley [1, USNM]; . . . , 14.xii.1981, . . . [1,
USNM]; Vietnam: Cao Bang Prov., Pia-Oac Mt Road,
1422 m, 22°33.972N105°52.238E, 24.v-5.vi.2011,
Castanopsis flowers, S Lingafelter, E. Jendek, E.
Vives, P. Hong Thai [1, USNM];..., general
daytime collecting,...[1, USNM].
CITROGRAMMA DIFFICILE (CURRAN, 1928)
Syrphus difficilis Curran, 1928: 213. Holotype: ,
BMNH, by original designation. Type locality: Malay-
sia: Cameron Highlands. Curran, 1928: 198, 213,
1931a: 313.
Citrogramma difficile of Vockeroth, 1969: 95;
Knutson et al., 1975: 311.
Citrogramma difficilis of Wyatt, 1991: 155, 158,
163.
Geographical distribution: Malay Peninsula
(Pahang), Borneo (Sabah, Sarawak).
Differential diagnosis: Species related to C. gedeha-
num and C. fascipleurum. Males differ from C. gede-
hanum only by the abdominal pattern and from
C. fascipleurum by yellow facial and notopleural
pilosity and black anepimeron. Females have lunule
dark and frons with a medial dark macula (Fig. 109),
in comparison with females of C. fascipleurum, which
have lunule yellow and frons yellow medially
(Fig. 107). Females of C. difficile and C. gedehanum
only differ in their occipital pilosity, which is black on
dorsal third in C. difficile.
Remarks: Curran (1928) questioned validity of C. dif-
ficile as a different species and pointed out the pos-
sibility that it could be a synonym of C. gedehanum
(de Meijere, 1914).
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural
History) (London, UK) and labelled: ‘PAHANG F.M.S./
Cameron Highlands/no. 4 Camp 4800 ft/Oct 14th
1923/H. M. Pendlebury’ ‘EX COLL./F.M.S./MUSEUM.’
[back of label] ‘TYPE/Syrphus/difficilis/No. Curran
[red] ‘LECTO–/TYPE’ [violet, round] ‘Pres. by/Fed.
138 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Malay States/Museum/B.M. 1934–74’ ‘LECTOTYPE
of/Syrphus/difficilis Curran/det. N.P. Wyatt 1989
‘LECTOTYPE/Citrogramma/difficile (Curran)/det. X.
Mengual 2009’ [red].
Type locality: Malaysia: Pahang, Cameron Highlands,
Camp no. 4, 1463 m, 4°30N, 101°27E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratype.M
ALAYSIA: Pahang, Cameron High-
lands, Rhododendron Hill, 5200 ft, 21.vi.1923, H.M.
Pendlebury [1, USNM].
Nontype material. MALAYSIA: Sarawak, Mt Dulit,
moss forest, 4000 ft, 18.x.1932, B.M. Hobby & A.W.
Moore [1, BMNH]; Sabah, Kinabalu National Park,
Headquarters area, 1560 m, 17.ix.1983, G.F. Hevel &
W.E. Steiner [1, USNM]; Sabah, 1 km S Kun-
dasang, 1530 m, 6.viii.1983, G.F. Hevel & W.E.
Steiner [1, USNM].
CITROGRAMMA DISTINCTUM
THOMPSON SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with low facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, with oral
apex slightly more prominent than antennal base,
entirely yellow, black pilose; gena yellow, dark
pilose; lunule yellow; holoptic; frontal triangle
yellow with very narrow posterior black vitta on eye
margin, black pilose; vertical triangle black, black
pilose, golden pollinose; ocelli reddish; antenna
orangish brown, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere orangish, dark dorsally; arista
dark; occiput black, silver pollinose, pale pilose on
ventral half, yellow pilose medially and dark pilose
on dorsal third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose with some metallic irides-
cence, with a lateral yellow vitta, black pilose except
notopleuron yellowish pilose on anteromedial half,
densely black pilose on lateral notopleuron and supra-
alar area; postpronotum yellow, brownish anteriorly;
notopleuron yellow continuing until scutellum, with
postalar callus entirely yellow; scutellum yellow with
dorsomedial broad dark brown macula, black pilose,
with a subscutellar fringe with black hairs, bare in
middle. Pleuron mostly yellow, except posterior ane-
pisternum black on anteroventral third, katepister-
num black with dorsal yellow macula, meron black,
posterior anepimeron black, katatergum black poste-
riorly, grey pollinose ventrally, mainly yellow
pilose, except anterior anepimeron black pilose
with little yellow hairs dorsally, anepisternum black
pilose on posterior and dorsal sections; metasternum
pilose; ventral calypter yellow with black hairs on
margin, dorsal calypter yellow, darkened anterodis-
tally; plumula yellow, long; halter orangish; spiracu-
lar fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brown, costal cell darker,
entirely microtrichose. Alula microtrichose, broad,
slightly broader than cell BM.
Legs: Pro- and mesocoxa and trochanter black, meta-
coxa and trochanter brownish; the rest of the legs
black, except pro- and mesofemur yellow brownish on
distal quarter and third respectively, and pro- and
mesotibia dark brown or black, brown pollinose. Legs
black pilose, tarsi golden pilose ventrolaterally.
Abdomen: See Figure 51. Parallel-sided, terga 2, 3,
and 4 margined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose
dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose
anterolaterally; tergum 1 black with a lateral yellow
macula; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral oblique
yellow maculae, extending forward laterally to ante-
rolateral tergal margin and broader mesomedially,
yellow lateral margin on anterior quarter to third;
terga 3 and 4 black with medial broad yellow fascia,
less than third of tergum length, extending antero-
laterally not reaching lateral margin; tergum 5
similar to 3 and 4 with narrower fascia; sterna yellow,
yellow pilose on sterna 1 and 2, black pilose on the
rest; male genitalia as in Figure 142.
Female: See description of females given below under
the C. schlingeri species group.
Length (N =1): Body, 9.5 mm; wing, 8.5 mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Latin distinctus meaning separate, different (Brown,
1956: 274), and refers to the distinctness of the
species although it is difficult to distinguish from
C. schlingeri and C. triton using external morphologi-
cal characters. Species epithet to be treated as an
adjective.
Differential diagnosis: Species with entirely yellow
face, gena yellow, broad frontal triangle (eye angle
more than 90°) with a narrow black fascia on eye
margin, costal cell darker than the rest of the wing
membrane (except stigma), brown macula on scutel-
lum and legs almost entirely black. As mentioned,
species difficult to distinguish from others in its
group, like C. schlingeri or C. triton; only male geni-
talia are different. Citrogramma pintada and C. piny-
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 139
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
ton are very similar and they probably belong to the
same species group, but these have anepisternum
yellow.
Remarks: Thompson studied Citrogramma
material in AMNH during his doctoral research
many years ago. He found two different new species,
C. schlingeri and C. distinctum, but never published
them. When this revisionary work was started, he
kindly offered this material to be included and new
studied material was included. The male genitalia of
C. distinctum are clearly different from the genitalia
of C. schlingeri and C. triton, but there are no exter-
nal morphological characters that can be used to
distinguish them. Females of this species group are
described together. Probably they are all a sympatric
cryptic species complex, occurring in the same geo-
graphical area.
Holotype male deposited in the American Museum
of Natural History (New York City, New York, USA)
and labelled: ‘Mt Dayman/Maneau Range/2230 m
N.SlopeNo.4/June 17–1953/Papua, New Guinea’
‘Geoffrey M. Tate/Collector’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogra-
mma/distinctum/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second
and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Northern Province
(also known as Oro Province), Ijivitari District, Mount
Dayman, 9°50S, 149°16E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above.
CITROGRAMMA FASCIPLEURUM (CURRAN, 1931)
Syrphus fascipleura Curran, 1931b: 352. Holotype: ,
BMNH, by original designation. Type locality: Malay-
sia: Mt Kinabalu. Curran, 1931a: 313, 1931b: 352.
Citrogramma fascipleura of Knutson et al., 1975:
311; Wyatt, 1991: 155, 158.
Citrogramma difficile of Wyatt, 1991 (in part).
Geographical distribution: Borneo.
Differential diagnosis: Citrogramma fascipleurum has
a shaped triangular black macula on scutellum, pro-
and mesofemur entirely yellow and metafemur black;
it is very similar to C. gedehanum and C. difficile.
Differences with C. gedehanum and C. difficile are
few: facial and notopleural pilosity black, and poste-
rior anepimeron yellow in males. The females of
C. fascipleurum have yellow lunule and the posterior
anepimeron is yellow (Fig. 110). The distribution of
C. fascipleurum overlaps with that of C. difficile.
Remarks: Holotype is not in very good condition with
abdomen glued to a label and right wing broken. The
female from Mt Dulit, previously identified as C. dif-
ficile (Wyatt, 1991), is here identified as C. fascipleu-
rum because both specimens share the same pleuron
pattern with anepimeron yellow except a dorsal black
macula on anterior section. The other morphological
character that distinguishes them from C. difficile is
the presence of black hairs on notopleuron.
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘Holo–/type’ [round, red
border] ‘Syrphus /TYPE/fascipleurum/Curran/
No.’ [red] ‘B.N. BORNEO,/Mt Kinabalu,/Kenokok,/
3.300 ft./22 Apr. 1929.’ ‘Pres. by/Fed. Malay States/
Museum. /B.M. 1934–74’ ‘Syrphus/fascipleurum/
Curran/Det./C.H. Curran’ ‘Citrogramma/fascipleurum
/(Curran)/K.D. Ghorpade det. 1979’.
Type locality: Malaysia: Sabah (in Borneo), Mount
Kinabalu, Kenokok, 1006 m, 6°04N, 116°33E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype, as above.
Nontype material. MALAYSIA: Sarawak, Mt Dulit,
moss forest, 4000 ft, B.M. Hobby & A.W. Moore [1,
BMNH].
CITROGRAMMA FLAVIGENUM WYATT, 1991
Citrogramma flavigena Wyatt, 1991: 159. Holotype:
, BMNH, by original designation. Type locality:
India: Kodaikanal. Wyatt, 1991: 158, 159, figs 5, 16.
Citrogramma flavigenum of Ghorpadé, 1994: 9.
Geographical distribution: India.
Differential diagnosis: Species similar to C. henryi,
but without the black macula on genal groove,
ventrad to eyes (Fig. 98). Citrogramma flavigenum
has gena yellow (Fig. 4), scutellum with a diffuse
brownish macula not always present (Fig. 53),
metafemur black, and pro- and mesofemur black on
basal quarter to third. Citrogramma flavigenum
differs from C. pennardsi and C. schlingeri by the
angle between eyes, which is under 90° in C. flavige-
num (Fig. 56).
Citrogramma flavigenum differs from C. citrinoides
by the coloration of pro- and mesofemur, being com-
pletely yellow in C. citrinoides. Lunule is yellow in
C. citrinoides, but dark in C. flavigenum.
Variation: In his original description, Wyatt (1991)
pointed out the brownish macula on facial tubercle
that the holotype had. This brown fasciated macula
is not always present amongst the material studied
here.
140 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Holotype male does not have the brownish macula
on scutellum. A specimen from Karnataka does not
have the brown macula on scutellum and the metafe-
mur is yellow basally. Citrogramma chola differs by
having anterior anepimeron yellow and metafemur
yellow on basal third to half (see notes about
C. chola). The Karnataka specimen has anepimeron
black, except dorsomedial section yellow like all indi-
viduals of C. flavigenum, and it has pro- and mesofe-
mur black basally.
The male deposited at CAS has the yellow fascia on
tergum 3 medially divided by a very narrow black
vitta forming two maculae. This is the only specimen
with this fascia divided that I have studied for the
Citrogramma genus, although the lectotype of C. ge-
dehanum is also close to having the yellow fascia
divided.
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘Kodaikanal 7000 ft./S.
India. 23III36’ ‘B.M. – C.M./Expedn to/S. India.
1936’ [back of the label] ‘HOLO–/TYPE’ [round, red]
HOLOTYPE of/Citrogramma/flavigenum n. sp./
det. N.P. Wyatt 1989’.
Type locality: India: Tamil Nadu, Dindigul District,
Kodaikanal, 2134 m, 10°13N, 77°28E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above.
Nontype material. INDIA: S India, Tamil Nadu,
Naduvattam, Nilgiri Hills, 6000 ft, v.1989, P.S.N.
‘Museum Leiden Collectie Van Doesburg rec. 1973’
[1, RMNH]; Karnataka, Nandi Hills, 1467 m,
27.vii.1975, K.D. Ghorpadé No. A207 [2, USNM];
South India, Anamalai Hills, Cinchona, 3500 ft,
ix.1967, T.R. Susai Nathan [1, ZMAN]; Tamil Nadu,
Kookal, 2000 m, 19.xi.2006, K.D. Ghorpade D592 [9
2, USNM];..., 21.v.2007, K.D. Ghorpadé D645
[1, USNM]; Tamil Nadu, Kookal Sholah, 2000 m,
24–25.x.2006, K.D. Ghorpadé D577 [3, USNM];
Kerala, Munnar, 2000 m, 23.iii.1977, K.D. Ghorpadé
A421 [1, USNM]; Tamil Nadu, Ootacamund,
2350 m, 23.x.1975, K.D. Ghorpadé A254 [1, USNM];
Tamil Nadu, Longwood Sholah, 1900 m, 26.xi.2003,
K.D. Ghorpadé D369 [1, USNM]; South India, 8 mi
NE Munnar, 6200 ft, 20.iii.1962, E.S. Ross & D.Q.
Cavagnaro [1, CAS].
CITROGRAMMA FREDERICI MENGUAL &GHORPADÉ
SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose, white pollinose laterally;
gena yellow, brown pilose medially, white pollinose
posteriorly; holoptic; lunule yellow; frontal triangle
yellow with orangish macula, black pilose, broad,
angle between eyes more than 90°; vertical triangle
black, black pilose; ocelli reddish; antenna brown,
black pilose on scape and pedicel; basoflagellomere
orangish ventrally; arista black; occiput black, silver
pollinose, whitish yellow pilose on ventral two
thirds, golden-yellow and black pilose on dorsal
third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose, with lateral yellow vitta and
sublateral matte black vitta, black and yellow dor-
sally pilose, lateral yellow macula yellow pilose except
postalar callus black pilose, densely yellow pilose on
lateral notopleuron and supra-alar area; postprono-
tum yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until
scutellum, with postalar callus entirely yellow; scutel-
lum yellow with medial orangish unclear macula,
black pilose, with complete subscutellar fringe of
black hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except katepister-
num black with dorsal yellow macula, meron black,
katatergum black posteriorly, posterior anepisternum
black on anterior half, and anepimeron yellow with
black maculae, entirely yellow pilose; metasternum
pilose; calypter yellow with yellow hairs on margin;
plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular fringes
yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brownish, microtrichose,
basally bare: cells R and BM bare basodorsally, cells
A1and R1bare basally. Alula microtrichose, broad,
broader than costal cell and slightly narrower than
cell BM.
Legs: Procoxa yellow, black dorsally; protrochanter,
femur and tibia yellow; mesocoxa and trochanter
black; mesofemur and tibia yellow, mainly black
pilose, yellow pilose basally; mesotarsus dark yellow,
brown; metacoxa and trochanter black; metafemur
yellow on basal half, black on distal half, mainly black
pilose, yellow pilose basally; metatibia black with
medial yellowish ring, black pilose; metatarsus black,
black pilose dorsally, golden yellow pilose ventrally.
Abdomen: Figure 79. Parallel-sided, slightly oval;
terga 3, 4, and 5 margined. Dorsum mainly black,
black pilose dorsally and laterally except tergum 1
yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose
laterally on anterobasal half; tergum 1 black, yellow
laterally; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral round
yellow maculae, extended forward laterally to ante-
rolateral tergal margin (like ‘golf club’-shaped spots),
yellow lateral margin on anterior half; tergum 3 black
with broad yellow fascia (about two fifths of tergum
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 141
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
length) with anterior margin almost parallel to ante-
rior margin and posterior margin slightly sinuate;
tergum 4 black with broad yellow fascia (about one
third of tergum length) expanded laterally; yellow
fascia on terga 3 and 4 reaching lateral margin;
tergum 5 black with two large yellow maculae, with
lateral margin almost entirely yellow; terga 2, 3, 4,
and 5 with shiny black fascia on posterior margin;
sterna 1 and 2 yellow, yellow pilose; sterna 3 and 4
yellow, black laterally, yellow pilose medially, black
elsewhere; genital segments brownish; male genitalia
brown, as in Figure 144.
Female: Similar to male except normal sexual dimor-
phism and as follows: frons yellow with medial orange
macula pointed posteriorly; anepisternum and ane-
pimeron entirely yellow. Wing microtrichose, basally
bare: cell R bare on basoanterior half until the furca
of cell R2+3and cell BM with small bare area very
close to anterior margin (Fig. 133). Terga 4 and 5
margined; tergum 2 black with yellow fascia extended
forward laterally to anterolateral tergal margin;
tergum 5 black with two large yellow maculae joined
medially (Fig. 123).
Length (N =2): Body, 11.6–12.0 (11.8) mm; wing,
9.7 mm.
Geographical distribution: India.
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to Frederic
Christian Thompson (USNM, Smithsonian Institu-
tion). Since his retirement in 2009, the government
addresses him by his first name, Frederic, but he is
hailed as Chris by his friends and colleagues. This
new species is named after Chris in his honour, for
dedicating his life to the study of the family Syr-
phidae and other Diptera, and for his guidance and
advice to all of his students, especially us (X. Mengual
and K. Ghorpadé), in pursuing our own research on
this family of flies.
Differential diagnosis: Species very distinct and large,
only known from southern India. Citrogramma fre-
derici keys out with C. shirakii, but they differ in
male genitalia and wing microtrichia, being bare
basally in C. frederici. Female specimen is very
similar to C. clarum; a dark orange macula on the
frons, wing partially bare, and dark protarsus sepa-
rate this female from the ones of C. clarum.
Remarks: Species only known from holotype male and
paratype female. This new species was originally
based on a single male. Later, Ghorpadé sent the
female specimen, which was identified by him as a
new species too. Thus both of us appear as co-authors.
Holotype male deposited in the Zoölogisch Museum
Amsterdam (Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Neth-
erlands) and labelled: ‘SOUTH INDIA/Mysore State/
Shimoga Dist./Agumbe Ghat/2000 ft. –V -1981/
T.R.Susai Nathan’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/
frederici/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and third
lines handwritten].’
Type locality: India: Karnataka State, Shimoga Dis-
trict, Mysore, Agumbe Ghat, 610 m, 13°30N, 75°05E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratype. INDIA: Karnataka, 4 km N. Agumbe,
621 m, 22.xi.1984, K. Ghorpadé B201 [1 , USNM].
CITROGRAMMA FUMIPENNE (MATSUMURA, 1916)
COMB.NOV.
Xanthogramma fumipenne Matsumura, 1916: 29.
Holotype: , NIAS, by monotypy. Type location:
Taiwan: Horisha. Matsumura, 1916: 29, fig. 20;
Shiraki, 1930: 402, 408 (in part).
Xanthogramma fumipennis of Matsumura, 1916:
28; Knutson et al., 1975: 320.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, black/dark brown pilose dorsally and later-
ally, yellow pilose on medial and ventral sections;
gena yellow, dark pilose on genal suture; lunule
yellow; holoptic; frontal triangle yellowish orange,
black pilose; angle between eyes approximately 90°;
vertical triangle black, black pilose; ocelli reddish;
antenna: only scape remains, which is brown, black
pilose; occiput black, silver pollinose, yellowish
pilose on ventral two thirds, dark pilose on dorsal
third.
Thorax: Scutum black, with lateral yellow vitta,
mainly yellow pilose with black hairs more abun-
dant on posterior quarter; postpronotum yellow;
notopleuron yellow continuing until scutellum,
yellow pilose; postalar callus yellow, black pilose;
scutellum yellow, black pilose, with subscutellar
fringe of black hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except
katepisternum black with dorsal yellow macula,
meron black, katatergum black posteriorly, ane-
pimeron black except dorsomedial portion yellow,
entirely yellow pilose; metasternum pilose; calypter
yellow with long yellow hairs and short black hairs
on margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular
fringes yellow.
142 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Wing: Wing membrane brownish, entirely microtri-
chose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Procoxa black on basal half, yellow on distal
half; profemur and tibia yellow, black pilose; protar-
sus brown except probasitarsomere yellow basally;
meso- and metacoxa black, meso- and metatrochanter
dark; mesofemur and tibia yellow; metafemur yellow
on basal two thirds, dark brown/black on distal third;
metatibia dark brown; meso- and metatarsus dark
brown, black pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 45. Parallel-sided, terga 3 and 4
weakly margined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose
dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose
laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on
anterobasal quarter; tergum 1 black; tergum 2 black
with two mesolateral round yellow maculae, extended
forward laterally to anterolateral tergal margin (like
‘golf club’-shaped spots), yellow lateral margin on
anterior quarter; terga 3 and 4 black with broad
yellow fascia with anterior margin slightly sinuate;
tergum 5 black with broad yellow fascia broadened
laterally, lateral margin almost entirely yellow;
sterna yellow, black pilose; male genitalia small, as in
Figures 127 and 130.
Female: Unknown.
Length (N =1): Body, 11.7 mm; wing, 10.4 mm.
Geographical distribution: Taiwan.
Differential diagnosis: Species with entire yellow
face, anepisternum yellow and anepimeron black.
Similar to C. luteifrons, from which differs by
having metafemur yellow on basal two thirds and
by the different abdominal pattern and geographical
distribution.
Remarks: Matsumura described X. fumipenne based
on a single male from Horisha, Taiwan (Formosa),
within his work on the economic Syrphidae of Japan
(Matsumura & Adachi, 1916). This species is here
transferred to the genus Citrogramma based on mor-
phological characters (head characters, scutellar
fringe, and pilose metasternum). Shiraki (1930)
redescribed this species and added more specimens
from different localities in Taiwan, such as Karenko,
Rakuraku, and Taikan, under the name X. fumi-
penne, and also described the female.
Amongst the examined material from the island
of Taiwan (Formosa), I have found three different
species, C. fumipenne comb. nov., C. shirakii sp. nov.,
and C. matsumurai sp. nov. Citrogramma fumipenne
is retained for the original male studied by Mat-
sumura, labelled ‘Formosa, Matsumura’, ‘Xanth.
fumipenne, Type Matsumura’. This male has a third
round label ‘Type’ that is the same as what Shiraki
used for his types. The other two species are based on
material identified by Shiraki as X. fumipenne.Citro-
gramma shirakii sp. nov. is based on a male from
Karenko with very large genitalia, distinct from
C. fumipenne, and anepisternum anteriorly black. In
his redescription of X. fumipenne, Shiraki mentioned
that the male had ‘hypopygium relatively very large,
prominent, rounded. . . with extremely long hairs’,
but these genitalia characters correspond to
C. shirakii Mengual sp. nov.
The female from Taikan that Shiraki (1930: 409)
described as C. fumipenne is a different taxon, C. mat-
sumurai Mengual sp. nov. It also has the round ‘Type’
label he used for type material. This female is quite
different from the male, with a lateral broad yellow
vitta on scutum and anepimeron entirely yellow, but
this sexual dimorphism has been seen in other
species, such as C. luteifrons. The size of the specimen
was also indicative (the female is larger than the
male of C. fumipenne), but this was not conclusive to
separate them as two different taxa. Finally, when
another male from Taiwan (deposited at MCZ) was
studied, I realised that this new male and the female
identified as C. fumipenne by Shiraki were the same
species.
To clarify the morphology of this species, a
re-description based on the holotype male of C. fumi-
penne is given.
Holotype male deposited in the National
Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences (Tsukuba,
Ibaraki, Japan) and labelled: ‘Formosa/Matsumura’
Xanth./fumipenne/Type/Matsumura’ [first and
second lines handwritten; third and fourth lines in
the back of the label] ‘Type’ [handwritten in red by
Shiraki] ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/fumipenne/det.
X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and third lines
handwritten].
Type locality: Taiwan: Taiwan (=Central Formosa),
Nantou Hsien (=Nantou County), Puli (=Horisha),
23°59N, 120°57E. Although it is not specified in the
type labels, Matsumura clarified that the type locality
was Horisha in the original description.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above.
CITROGRAMMA GEDEHANUM (DE MEIJERE, 1914)
Syrphus gedehanus de Meijere, 1914: 156. Lectotype:
, ZMAN, here designated. Type locality: Indonesia:
Java, Gunung Gedeh. de Meijere, 1914: 156; Hervé-
Bazin, 1923a: 25.
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 143
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Olbiosyrphus gedehanus of Hervé-Bazin, 1926: 67;
Frey, 1946: 163.
Citrogramma gedehanum of Knutson et al., 1975:
311.
Citrogramma gedehanus of Wyatt, 1991: 155, 158.
Geographical distribution: Java, Sumatra, Hainan.
Differential diagnosis: Species with yellow face, pos-
terior anepisternum black on anterior third or more,
scutellum with a defined black triangular macula,
notopleuron entirely yellow pilose, anepimeron black
except dorsomedial section (Fig. 118), pro- and
mesofemur entirely yellow and facial hairs exten-
sively yellow. Very similar to C. fascipleurum and
C. difficile, with similar bluish scutum divided by two
dark vittae broadening posteriorly. As mentioned
above, C. gedehanum differs from C. difficile by the
abdominal pattern in males (Figs 112, 116) and by
occipital hairs in females. Citrogramma fascipleurum
has yellow face with lateral black hairs, notopleuron
yellow pilose with some black hairs, and posterior
anepimeron yellow (Fig. 110).
Citrogramma gedehanum was described from Java
and there are also records from Sumatra. This species
belongs to a very complex species group with C. dif-
ficile,C. currani,C. fascipleurum,C. variscutatum,
and C. wyatti. In the identification key, morphological
characters are provided to key out all these species
properly. As mentioned by Curran (1928), I would not
be surprised if C. difficile was considered a variety of
C. gedehanum with a different abdominal pattern
after using more evidence and/or DNA analyses.
Remarks: de Meijere (1908) did not designate a holo-
type in his work when describing Syrphus gedehanus,
now C. gedehanum. In his original description there
is a note about the type material: ‘Gunung Gedeh,
März, JACOBSON leg.; G. Gedeh, Juni, 1500–
2000 m., 1, KONINGSBERGER leg.’.
de Jong (2000) explained in his book that the type
material of this species is deposited at ZMAN, con-
stituting two syntype males. One male is labelled
‘E. Jacobson/Goenoeag Gedeh/Java Maart 1911’,
Syrphus/gedehanus/det. de Meijere./Type’ [handwrit-
ten except third line, de Meijere] ‘Syrphus/
gedehanus/de Meijere 1914/ZMAN type DIPT.0989.1’.
The other male is labelled ‘E. Jacobson/Goenoeag
Gedeh/Java Maart 1911’ ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de
Meijere, 1914/ZMAN type DIPT.0989.2’. There is
another male labelled ‘Java/Jacobson’ ‘Syrphus/
gedehanus/de Meijere, 1914/ZMAN type? DIPT. 0989’
that de Jong (2000) also mentioned in his notes about
C. gedehanum as possible material of the type series.
After its study, this male is considered here as part of
the type series of C. gedehanum.
de Jong (2000) noticed that although de Meijere
(1914) described the male and female of S. gedehanus,
no female is present amongst the ZMAN material
collected by Jacobson. Thus, de Jong suggested that
the only female at ZMAN collected by Koningsberger
could belong to the type series of S. gedehanus.
However, de Meijere (1914) indicated only a male
collected by Koningsberger in his type material note.
This female specimen is labelled ‘Gedeh. JAVA/
Koningsberger/4.1911. 15002000 Mv. gedehanus
/??/det. de Meijere’ [handwritten except third line, de
Meijere] ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de Meijere 1914/ZMAN
type DIPT.0989.3’. After reviewing the material, this
female was excluded from the type series because it is
not a female of C. gedehanum, but of C. variscutatum.
Moreover, a male in RMNH that is labelled ‘Gedeh.
JAVA/Koningsberger/1911 Juni/15002000 m’isin
agreement with the material that de Meijere origi-
nally cited. Thus, I assigned this male as a paralec-
totype of C. gedehanum.
Amongst the examined syntypes (three males)
deposited at the Zoölogisch Museum Amsterdam
(Universiteit van Amsterdam, the Netherlands), there
is a pinned male labelled ‘E. Jacobson/Goenoeag
Gedeh/Java Maart 1911’, ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/det. de
Meijere./Type’ [handwritten except third line, de
Meijere] ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de Meijere 1914/ZMAN
type DIPT.0989.1’. This specimen is here designated
as the lectotype of C. gedehanum to fix and ensure the
universal and consistent interpretation of the name.
The other syntypes have been labelled as paralecto-
types of C. gedehanum.
Lectotype male deposited in the Zoölogisch
Museum Amsterdam (Universiteit van Amsterdam,
the Netherlands) and labelled: ‘E. Jacobson/Goenoeag
Gedeh/Java Maart 1911’, ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/det. de
Meijere./Type’ [handwritten except third line, de
Meijere] ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de Meijere 1914/
ZMAN type DIPT.0989.1’ ‘LECTOTYPE/Citrogra-
mma/gedehanum/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second
and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Indonesia: West Java, Gunung Gedeh,
6°47S, 106°57E.
Material examined: Type material. Lectotype,as
above. Paralectotypes.I
NDONESIA: West Java,
Gunung Gedeh, ‘E. Jacobson/Goenoeag Gedeh/Java
Maart 1911’, ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de Meijere 1914/
ZMAN type DIPT.0989.2’ [1, ZMAN];..., ‘Java/
Jacobson’, ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de Meijere 1914/
ZMAN type? DIPT. 0989’ [1, ZMAN];..., ‘Gedeh.
JAVA/Koningsberger/1911 Juni/19002000 m’[1,
RMNH].
144 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Nontype material. INDONESIA: West Sumatra,
Gunung Talakmau, 0°10N, 100°00E, ‘Edw. Jacobson/
Gun. Teleman/Sum. 6.1917’ [8, ZMAN; 1,
RMNH];...,‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de Meij.’ [handwrit-
ten, de Meijere] [2, ZMAN];..., ‘Syrphus/
gedehanus//de Meij.’ [handwritten, de Meijere] [1,
ZMAN]; N Sumatra, Aceh, Mount Leuser, 2000–
2300 m, 29.i.1937, A. Hoogerwerf [1, RMNH]; West
Java, Mount Pangrango, 3000 m, 24.xii.1919, D.V.L.
[1, ZMAN]; Central Java, Mount Telomoyo, 1900 m,
top, 20.x.1939. M.A. Lieftinck [1, RMNH]; Java,
Muller [9, RMNH]; Java, Blume [2, RMNH]; East
Java, G. Malang, Mts. Djampangs, x.1936, R. Mus.
Hist. Nat. Belg. I.G.11.161 [1, IRSNB]; CHINA:
Hainan, Ledong County, jianfengling, 16.xi.2006,
Ke-Ke Huo [6, SBSC] (Huo, unpubl. data).
CITROGRAMMA HENRYI GHORPADÉ, 1994
Citrogramma henryi Ghorpadé, 1994: 9. Holotype: ,
USNM, by original designation. Type locality: India:
Kande-ela. Ghorpadé, 1994: 9.
Xanthogramma citrinum of Keiser, 1958: 193.
Citrogramma citrinum of Vockeroth, 1969: 95,
fig. 57; Knutson et al., 1975 (in part).
Citrogramma sp. C of Wyatt, 1991: 158, 167.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, black pilose dorsally and medially, yellow
pilose on ventral section, white pollinose laterally;
gena yellow with black macula on genal groove, dark
and yellow pilose, white pollinose posteriorly
(Fig. 98); lunule orangish with a dark line delimiting
it; holoptic; frontal triangle yellow, black pilose; ver-
tical triangle black, shorter than eye contiguity, black
pilose, golden pollinose; ocelli reddish; antenna dark,
scape brownish, pedicel black, scape and pedicel black
pilose; basoflagellomere orangish, dark dorsally;
arista black; occiput black, silver pollinose, pale pilose
on ventral half, black pilose on dorsal half and yellow
pilose medially.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose with metallic iridescence,
entirely black pilose dorsally, with lateral yellow
vitta; postpronotum yellow; notopleuron yellow,
mainly black pilose, yellow pilose anteriorly; yellow
vitta continuing until scutellum, supra-alar area
orangish yellow and black pilose; postalar callus
entirely yellow, mainly black pilose; scutellum yellow
with a dorsomedial broad defined brown macula,
black pilose, with a complete (small bare area in
middle) subscutellar fringe with black hairs. Pleuron
entirely yellow pilose, mostly black except: anterior
anepisternum yellow, black on posterodorsal part;
dorsomedial anepimeron yellow; posterior anepister-
num black with yellow macula on posterior half to
two thirds; katepisternum black with dorsal yellow
macula; katepimeron yellow; katatergum mostly
yellow, black on posterior margin. Metasternum
pilose; calypter yellow with yellow and black hairs on
margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular
fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane light brown, entirely microt-
richose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter dark, brownish, coxa
yellow pilose, metacoxa with four to six long black
hairs anterolaterally, trochanter black pilose; pro- and
mesofemur black on basal third, yellow distally with
brownish areas, black pilose; pro- and mesotibiae
yellow, black pilose with some yellow hairs; metaleg
entirely black, black pilose; tarsi black, black pilose
dorsolaterally and golden pilose ventrolaterally.
Abdomen: Figure 91. Parallel-sided, abdominal terga
3, 4, and 5 margined. Dorsum mainly black, black
pilose dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow
pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally
on anterobasal one quarter to one third and on dorsal
yellow maculae; tergum 1 black; tergum 2 black with
two mesolateral broad yellow maculae narrowed lat-
erally and extending forward to anterolateral tergal
margin, yellow lateral margin on anterior third;
tergum 3 with broad sinuate yellow fascia markedly
emarginate posteriorly and narrowed to lateral
margins, with broad black fascia on anterior margin;
terga 4 and 5 black with similar fascia as the one on
tergum 3 but narrower and posterior emargination
less marked; lateral margins of terga 3, 4, and 5
partially yellow, about a third; sterna yellow, yellow
pilose on sterna 1 and 2, black pilose on the rest;
genital segments yellowish; male genitalia as in
Figures 128–130.
Female: Similar to male except for normal sexual
dimorphism and as follows: face yellow, usually with
brown area on facial tubercle; lunule dark; frons
yellow with anteromedial triangular black or dark
area extending posteromedially reaching ocellar tri-
angle, lateral yellow areas not converging posteriorly;
dorsal occiput and ocellar triangle golden pollinose;
scutum with the dorsomedial grey pollinose area
broader, with the lateral black area between lateral
yellow vitta and dorsomedial grey pollinose area very
narrow or difficult to distinguish; pro- and mesofemur
yellow, black on basal quarter; abdomen more oval,
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 145
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
tergum 2 with maculae narrower, terga 3, 4, and 5
with yellow fascia narrower, sinuate but less emar-
ginate (Fig. 92).
Variation: Some female specimens have a few black
hairs on posterior margin of anepisternum. The
medial brown facial macula or vitta varies in size
amongst studied specimens, but some females have
an entirely yellow face.
After reviewing most of the type material, the three
paratype males look like immature adults and
present anepimeron completely yellow with white pol-
linosity, and pro- and mesofemur yellow, brownish at
extreme base. The same occurs in females, with some
immature specimens being very pale (anepimeron
yellow and pro- and mesofemur yellow) and some
specimens have metafemur basally yellow. Most of
the paler specimens, but not all, are from the type-
locality (Sri Lanka: Nuwara Eliya). Owing to these
pale individuals, there is a small note in key couplet
31 above to explain this variability.
Length (N =5): Body, 10.0–11.5 (10.5) mm; wing, 8.8–
10.0 (9.4) mm.
Geographical distribution: Sri Lanka.
Etymology: This species honours G. M. Henry, an
orthopterist and ornithologist, formally an Assistant
in Systematic Entomology at the Colombo Museum in
Sri Lanka (then Ceylon).
Differential diagnosis: Endemic species to the island
of Sri Lanka, and the single species found on the
island so far. This species is characterized by face
entirely yellow with a black macula on genal groove,
scutellum yellow with a brownish macula, metafemur
black and pro- and mesofemur dark basally. Species
very similar to C. flavigenum, which has gena entirely
yellow (Fig. 4), scutellar brown macula smaller and
less evident, and facial tubercle slightly brown.
Another diagnostic character is the lateral pilosity of
the scutum: C. henryi has notopleuron and supra-alar
area black pilose and C. flavigenum has notopleuron
and supra-alar area yellow pilose, with a few black
hairs on the posteroventral section of notopleuron.
Remarks: Citrogramma citrinum was cited from Sri
Lanka by Vockeroth (1969) and Knutson et al. (1975).
These citations are in all probability C. henryi, the
only known species from that island.
Amongst the material in BMNH, there are three
specimens with an identification label ‘Xantho: yer-
buryi Brun. Det. Brnn. 1921–22’, and two of them
have in addition ‘Type ’ and ‘Type ’ labels for a
male and a female, respectively. It seems that Bru-
netti had selected these specimens for his new species
dedicated to its first collector, Yerbury, but he never
got to publish the name Xanthogramma yerburyi. All
of these three specimens correspond to C. henryi.In
the collection in BMNH, there is also a female
labelled ‘Nuwava Eliya, 9.v.1891, Lt.Col. Yerbury
1892–192’ with a glued head of another Syrphidae
genus. The head does not correspond to the body, but
the body is a female of C. henryi.
Holotype male deposited in the National Museum
of Natural History (Washington D.C., USA) and
labelled: ‘SRI LANKA:N.E. Dist./Kande-ela/2 June
1975/S.L. Wood & J.L. Pretty’ ‘Collected in/malaise/
trap’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/henryi/K.D. Ghor-
pade 1983’ [red, handwritten except fourth line].
Type locality: Sri Lanka: Central Province, District
Nuwara Eliya, Kande Ela, 6°56N, 80°46E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.S
RI LANKA: N.E. Dist., Nuwara
Eliya, Galway Nat. Res., 1790–1990 m, 22–23.x.1977
‘K.V. Krombein, T. Wijesinhe, M. Jayaweera, P.A.
Panawatta’ [23, USNM];...,6200 ft, 10.vi.1978,
Malaise trap ‘K.V. Krombein, P.B. Karunaratne, T.
Wijesinhe, V. Kulasekare, L. Jayawickrema’ [2,
USNM]; N.E. Dist., Nuwara Eliya, 27–29.v.1975 ‘D.H.
Messersmith, G.L. Williams, P.B. Karunaratne’ [1,
USNM]; N.E. Dist., Horton Plains, 23.iv.1980 ‘W.N.
Mathis, T. Wijesinhe, L. Jayawickrema’ [1, USNM];
N.E. Dist., Hakgala Sanctuary, 6300–6500 ft,
9–10.vi.1978 ‘K.V. Krombein, P.B. Karunaratne, T.
Wijesinhe, L. Jayawickrema’ [1, USNM]; N.E. Dist.,
Kande-ela, 2.vi.1975, S.L. Wood & J.L. Petty ‘collected
in Malaise trap’ [5, USNM]; N.E. Dist., Kande-ela
Reservoir, 5.6 mi SW Nuwara Eliya, 6200 ft,
10–21.ii.1970, Davis & Rowe [3, USNM]; Bad. Dist.,
Kande-ela Reservoir, 6200 ft, 1–5.x.1970, O.S. Flint
Jr. [21, USNM]; N.E. Dist., Hakgala Natural
Reserve, 6–7.ii.1979 ‘K.V. Krombein, P.B.
Karunaratne, T. Wijesinhe, S. Siriwardane, T.
Gunawardane’ [2, USNM]; N.E. Dist., Mt Piduruta-
lagala, 1 mi. N Nuwara Eliya, 6500–7500 ft,
14.ii.1970, Davis & Rowe [1, USNM]; N.E. Dist., Mt
Pidurutalagala, 6500–7500 ft, 8.x.1976 ‘G.F. Hevel,
R.F. Dietz IV, S. Karunaratne, D.W. Balasooriya’ [1,
USNM]; Ken. Dist., Rangala, 2.iv.1971, P. & P. Span-
gler [1, USNM]; Pidrutalagala, 20–2460 m,
19.ix.1953, F. Keiser [1, CNC]; C.P., ‘Strasby Estate’
Upcot, 4500 ft, 24.vii.1966, P.B. Karunaratne [3,
CNC]; Emelina, 25–29.xii.1918, R. Senior-White ‘B.M.
1924–100’ [1, BMNH];.... 12–13.i.1919,...[1,
BMNH];..., 5–8.vi.1913,...‘on bean’[1, BMNH];
Ohiya, iv.1929 ‘Colombo Museum’ [21, CNMS].
Nontype material. SRI LANKA: N.E. Dist., Hakgala
Natural Reserve, 1650–1800 m, 23–25.ii.1977 ‘K.V.
146 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Krombein, P.B. Karunaratne, P. Fernando, D.W. Bala-
sooriya’ [1, USNM]; Maskeliya, in bedroom,
20.i.1919, R. Senior White, ‘B.M. 1924–100’ [1,
BMNH]; Namunukuli, ii.1910 [1, BMNH]; Emelina.
5–8.vi.1913, R. Senior–White ‘on beans’ ‘B.M. 1924–
100’ [1, BMNH]; Nuwara Eliya, 12.vii.1892, Lt.Col.
Yerbury 1892–192 ‘Xantho: yerburyi Brun. Type .
Det. Brnn. 1921–22’ [1, BMNH];..., 18.v.1891,
Lt.Col. Yerbury 1892–192 ‘Xantho: yerburyi Brun.
Det. Brnn. 1921–22’ [1, BMNH]; ..., 11.vii.1892,
Lt.Col. Yerbury 1892–192 ‘Xantho: yerburyi Brun.
Type . Det. Brnn. 1921–22’ [1, BMNH];...,
9.v.1891, Lt.Col. Yerbury 1892–192 [1, BMNH];
Pidurutalagala For., Nuwara Eliya, 27.ii.1974, A.E.
Stubbs & P.J. Chandler ‘BMNH 1974–624’ [1,
BMNH].
CITROGRAMMA HERVEBAZINI (CURRAN, 1928)
Syrphus hervebazini Curran, 1928: 207. Lectotype: ,
BMNH, designated by Wyatt (1991) Type locality:
Malaysia: Camerons Highlands, Rhododendron Hill.
Curran, 1928: 199, 207, 1931a: 313.
Syrphus circumdatus of Curran, 1928 (in part);
Knutson et al., 1975 (in part).
Citrogramma hervebazini of Vockeroth, 1969: 95,
fig. 7; Knutson et al., 1975: 311; Wyatt, 1991: 155,
157, 164.
Geographical distribution: Malay Peninsula
(Pahang), Borneo (Sarawak).
Differential diagnosis: Peculiar species with yellow
gena, broad black facial vitta, scutellum with a
medial triangular black macula (Fig. 29), pro- and
mesotibia yellow (brownish distally and basally), and
large male genitalia with surstylus bearing long tufts
of hairs. An interesting character is the black halter
capitulum (see Figs 29, 41). Citrogramma hervebazini
keys near C. solomonense but they are quite distinct
as noted in the identification key.
Citrogramma hervebazini has similar male genita-
lia to the one of C. shirakii, but they have significant
morphological differences. Citrogramma hervebazini
has yellow face with black medial vitta, scutellum
with black macula, metafemur black, and halter
capitulum black. Although male genitalia are similar
in shape, C. hervebazini’s genitalia are larger, having
broader protuberance of the surstylus and larger
superior lobes (see Figs 151, 152).
Remarks: This taxon was designated the type species
of the genus Citrogramma by Vockeroth (1969: 95).
Curran (1928) based his new species C. hervebazini
on four males but he did not designate a holotype.
Wyatt (1991) studied three of these four males, and
designated a lectotype and paralectotypes. The fourth
male studied by Curran is deposited at the AMNH
and included here as a paralectotype.
Lectotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘PAHANG, F.M.S./
‘Cameron’s High–/lands.’/Rhododendron Hill ft./
5200 14th June, 1923/H.M. Pendlebury’ ‘Pres. by/Fed.
Malay States/Museum./B.M. 1934–74’ ‘TYPE/Syrphus/
hervebazini/No. Curran’ [red, handwritten by Curran]
‘LECTO–/TYPE’ [round, violet] LECTOTYPE
of/Syrphus/hervebazini Curran/det. N.P. Wyatt 1989’.
Type locality: Malaysia: Pahang, Cameron Highlands,
Rhododendron Hill, 1585 m, 4°30N, 101°27E.
Material examined: Type material. Lectotype,as
above. Paralectotypes.M
ALAYSIA: Pahang, Cameron
Highlands, Rhododendron Hill, 5200 ft, 18.vi.1923,
H.M. Pendlebury [2, BMNH]; ...,14.vi.1923, H.M.
Pendlebury [1, AMNH].
Nontype material. MALAYSIA: Sarawak, Mt Dulit,
moss forest, 4000 ft, 22.x.1932, native collected, Oxford
Univ. Exp. B.M. Hobby & A.W. Moore, B.M. 1933–254
[1, CNC]; Sarawak, Mt Dulit, moss forest, 4000 ft,
14.x.1932, native collected, Oxford Univ. Exp. B.M.
Hobby & A.W. Moore, B.M. 1933–254 [3, BMNH];
B.N. Borneo, Mt Kinabalu, Kamborangah, 7000 ft,
30.iii.1929, H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH].
CITROGRAMMA LUTEIFRONS (DE MEIJERE, 1908)
Syrphus luteifrons de Meijere, 1908: 304. Neotype: ,
ZMAN, here designated. Type locality: Indonesia:
Heuvelbivak, here restricted by neotype designation.
de Meijere, 1908: 304, fig. 37; 1914: 157; Hervé-Bazin,
1923a: 25; Shiraki, 1930: 405, 410.
Olbiosyrphus luteifrons of Hervé-Bazin, 1926: 67;
Frey, 1946: 163.
Citrogramma luteifrons of Thompson & Vockeroth,
1989: 442; Wyatt, 1991: 155.
Geographical distribution: Indonesia (West Papua,
Sulawesi).
Differential diagnosis: Species with different pleural
pattern in males and females. Males with yellow face,
posterior anepisternum yellow, anepimeron black,
and metafemur mainly black, yellow on basal quarter
to third (Fig. 48). It differs from C. fumipenne in col-
oration of metafemur, abdominal pattern, and by the
brownish macula on scutellum (C. fumipenne has
scutellum entirely yellow).
Females of C. luteifrons, collected from the neotype
locality (Heuvelbivak, West Papua), have anepimeron
yellow, slightly darker dorsally on posterior ane-
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 147
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
pimeron, like females of C. luteopleurum. Females of
both species are very similar, but they can be differ-
entiated by the abdominal pattern, as pointed out in
the key. Females of C. luteifrons have some black
hairs on notopleuron and they key out with immature
females of C. chola (couplet 31), but they differ in the
coloration of lunule and frons, which is yellow in
C. luteifrons (Fig. 46) and dark in C. chola (Fig. 82).
Remarks: de Meijere (1908) cited the type material as
follows: ‘Neu-Guinea: Moroka, 1 , Loria leg. (Mus.
Genua)’. de Jong (2000) pointed out that ‘the male
holotype from MCSN was lost in HNHM in 1956, and
non-type specimens identified by de Meijere are
in ZMAN’. After the study of the ZMAN material
of C. luteifrons, a male was found with the follow-
ing labels: ‘Z.NieuwGuinea/Lorentz 1909–10/
Heuvelbivak/800 m/715.xi.09’ [fourth and fifth lines
written vertically] ‘Syrphus /luteifrons/det. de
Meijere.’ (italics =handwritten, de Meijere). This
specimen is here designated as the neotype to fix and
ensure the universal and consistent interpretation of
C. luteifrons.
In the original description of S. luteifrons,de
Meijere (1908) wrote that the pleuron was mainly
yellow except the ventral portion and a pair of dark
brown maculae. These two dark maculae probably
correspond to those on anterior section of posterior
anepisternum and anepimeron; both areas are dark
or black in the material studied from ZMAN.
Neotype male deposited in the Zoölogisch Museum
Amsterdam (Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Neth-
erlands) and labelled: ‘Z.NieuwGuinea/Lorentz 1909–
10/Heuvelbivak/800 m/715.xi.09’ [fourth and fifth
lines written vertically] ‘Syrphus /luteifrons/det.
de Meijere.’ (italics =handwritten, de Meijere)
NEOTYPE/Citrogramma/luteifrons/det. X. Mengual
2009’ [red, handwritten except fourth line].
Type locality: Indonesia: West Papua, Heuvelbivak,
800 m, 4°30S, 138°45E.
Material examined: Type material. Neotype, as above.
Nontype material. INDONESIA: West Papua, Heuvel-
bivak, 800 m, 7–15.xi.1909, Lorentz [22, ZMAN];
Sulawesi (=Celebes Island), 30 km NW Rantepao,
Bulu–Bulu, 9–15.v.1966, Malaise trap, R. Straatman
[1, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA LUTEOPLEURUM MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Citrogramma luteifrons of Wyatt, 1991: 157, 165.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, mainly yellow pilose, dark pilose dorsally and
laterally, white pollinose laterally; gena yellow with a
brown macula ventrad to eye, mainly yellow pilose
with little dark hairs on macula, white pollinose pos-
teriorly; holoptic; lunule orange; frontal triangle
yellow with a medial triangular orange macula
pointed posteriorly, black pilose; vertical triangle
black, black pilose (Fig. 58); ocelli brownish; antenna
brownish, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere dark dorsally; arista brown; occiput
black, mainly silver pollinose, golden pollinose dor-
sally, yellowish-white pilose on ventral two thirds,
black pilose on dorsal third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose with some metallic irides-
cence, with lateral yellow vitta and sublateral narrow
matte black vitta, black and yellow pilose dorsally,
mainly yellow pilose laterally except postalar callus
entirely black pilose and some black hairs dorsally
after transverse suture, densely yellow pilose on
lateral notopleuron and supra-alar area; postprono-
tum yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until
scutellum; scutellum yellow with dorsomedial broad
brownish macula reaching posterior margin, black
pilose, with complete subscutellar fringe of black
hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow (Fig. 58), except katepis-
ternum black with a dorsal large yellow macula,
meron black and anepimeron yellow with a small
black macula on posterior section, entirely yellow
pilose; metasternum pilose; calypter yellow, black-
ened basally and distally, with yellow and black hairs
on margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular
fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brownish, lighter on posterior
margin, entirely microtrichose. Alula microtrichose,
broad, broader than costal cell, and slightly narrower
than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow, yellow pilose; pro-
and mesofemur and tibia yellow; pro- and mesotarsus
dark yellow, clearly different from tibia; metafemur
black, yellow, or yellowish on basal half; tibiae and
tarsi black; femur, tibia, and tarsus mainly black
pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 59. Parallel-sided, tergum 4 slightly
margined. Dorsum mainly matte black, except terga
2, 3, and 4 each with a posterior shiny black fascia,
black pilose dorsally and laterally except tergum 1
yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose
laterally on anterobasal third; tergum 1 black, yellow
laterally; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral
subtriangular yellow maculae, laterally extending
forward to anterolateral tergal margin (like ‘golf club’-
shaped spots), yellow lateral margin on anterior half;
148 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
terga 3 and 4 black with broad slightly sinuate yellow
fascia on anterior half of tergum, about two fifths of
tergum length, not reaching lateral margin; tergum 5
black with yellow fascia, widening laterally; sterna
yellow, yellow pilose with black hairs posteriorly;
genital segments yellowish; male genitalia brownish,
as in Figures 127 and 130.
Female: Similar to male except for normal sexual
dimorphism and as follows: face yellow entirely
pilose; frons yellow, orangish medially dorsad to
lunule, with a black vitta on lateral margin from
ocellar triangle to half distance between anterior
ocellus and antennal base; abdominal tergum 2 with
two yellow maculae joined medially forming a fascia;
terga 3, 4, and 5 with a straight yellow fascia not
reaching lateral margin (Fig. 60).
Variation: Coloration of coxa and trochanter is vari-
able. Some individuals have a yellowish ring on
metatibia, difficult to see. Some specimens have a
yellow fascia on tergum 4 that only the anterior
portion of the fascia reaches lateral margins, but
mostly not. Few specimens have tergum 5 with a
yellow fascia little widening laterally. The scutellar
brown macula is very clear in most of the specimens,
but some individuals can look like they have yellow
scutellum. The lateral matte black vitta of scutum
may be indistinguishable in some specimens. Some
individuals present a dark yellow area on anterior
half of posterior anepisternum as a result of the
drying process. Although it should not create confu-
sion, there is a note under couplet 39 explaining the
differences in a possible case of misinterpretation.
Length (N =5): Body, 10.0–10.8 (10.5) mm; wing, 8.5–
9.1 (8.8) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Latin luteus meaning yellow, and the Greek pleura
meaning side (Brown, 1956: 500, 618), and refers to
the large yellow area on pleuron of this species.
Species epithet to be treated as an adjective.
Differential diagnosis: Citrogramma luteopleurum
belongs to a species group where specimens present a
yellow fascia on terga 3 and 4 not reaching lateral
margins. The species are very difficult to differentiate
amongst the group, including C. pintada and
C. schlingeri.Citrogramma luteopleurum is similar to
C. pintada, but with frontal triangle entirely yellow
and lunule yellow; females of C. luteopleurum have
frons medially yellow.
Remarks: The male collected by H. Roberts (BMNH)
was identified and published as C. luteifrons by Wyatt
(1991), but it has posterior anepisternum yellow
(slightly dark yellow anteroventrally) and ane-
pimeron yellow with posterior anepimeron black very
dorsally; thus not matching the original description of
the species. Moreover, this BMNH male has abdomi-
nal tergum 3 with a yellow fascia that does not reach
lateral margins. This male is here designated as the
holotype of Citrogramma luteopleurum Mengual sp.
nov.
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘PAPUA NEW GUINEA:/
Kulolo Creek/9vi1983/H. Roberts’ [handwritten]
‘2128’ ‘Citrogramma sp. /nr. clarum HerveBaz./
det. N.P. Wyatt 1983’‘Citrogramma/luteifrons
(de Meijere)/det. N.P. Wyatt 1989’ ‘HOLOTYPE/
Citrogramma/luteopleurum/det. X. Mengual 2009
[red, second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province,
Wau, Kulolo Creek, 70°20S, 146°42E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: (NE) Morobe
Province, Wau, 1500 m, 24.ix.1961, J. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM];..., 1200 m, 10.v.1963, J. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM];..., Nakata Ridge, 4700 ft, 11.vi.1968, J.W.
Boyes [22, CNC]; Owen Stanley Range, Goilala,
Loloipa. 1–15.ii.1958, W.W. Brandt [12, BPBM];
Wau, 1250 m, 23.viii.1965, Malaise trap, J. & M.
Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; Tapini, 1100 m, 7.xi.1968,
N.L.H. Krauss [1, BPBM]; (NE) 6 km W of Wau,
Nami Creek, 1700 m, 15.vi.1962, Malaise trap, J.
Sedlacek [1, BPBM];..., 10.vi.1962,...[1,
BPBM]; NE Ialibu, 8–14.i.1968, 2900 m, Gressitt–
Maa [1, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA MARISSA MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, yellow with
medial dark vitta from oral apex to antennal base,
narrower than yellow lateral areas of face, mainly
yellow pilose, black pilose laterodorsally, white
pollinose laterally; gena yellow with black vitta on
genal suture, mainly yellow pilose with black hairs
on black vitta; holoptic; lunule dark; frontal triangle
yellow with anteromedial diffuse black subtrian-
gular area pointed posteriorly, black pilose; vertical
triangle black, black pilose; ocelli brownish; antenna
dark brown, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere orangish, dark dorsally; arista
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 149
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
black; occiput black, silver pollinose, yellowish pilose
on ventral third, golden-yellow pilose on dorsal two
thirds.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial grey polli-
nose area and three bluish vittae with some metallic
iridescence, lateral yellow vitta, yellow pilose with a
few black hairs; postpronotum yellow, black anteri-
orly; notopleuron yellow continuing until scutellum,
with ventral black vitta narrowing yellow area until
transverse suture; postalar callus entirely yellow,
yellow and black pilose; scutellum yellow with dorso-
medial triangular black macula reaching anterior
margin, black pilose, with complete subscutellar
fringe of black hairs. Pleuron mostly black, except
proepimeron yellow, posterior anepisternum with
yellow vitta on posterior third, katepisternum with
dorsal yellow macula, katepimeron and katatergum
with large yellow macula, entirely yellow pilose;
metasternum pilose; calypter yellow medially and
blackened basally and distally with black hairs on
margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular
fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane almost hyaline, partly microt-
richose: costal cell bare (with few microtrichia dis-
tally), cells R1,R
2+3,R
4+5, DM, and CuA1bare basally,
cell CuP bare dorsally, and cells BM and R almost
completely bare (Fig. 132). Alula microtrichose, broad,
broader than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter dark brown or black,
yellow pilose; pro- and mesofemur yellow, brownish
very distally, profemur yellow pilose with a few black
hairs distally, mesofemur yellow pilose on dorsal third
and black pilose on ventral two thirds; pro- and meso
tibia yellow; pro- and mesotarsus brown except proba-
sitarsomere yellow, black pilose; metaleg dark brown,
black pilose except metafemur yellow pilose dorsally.
Abdomen: Figure 119. Parallel-sided; terga 2, 3, and 4
clearly margined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose
dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose
laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on
anterobasal half; tergum 1 black; tergum 2 black with
two mesolateral round yellow maculae, laterally
extending forward to anterolateral tergal margin (like
‘golf club’-shaped spots), separated for about third of
tergum width, yellow lateral margin on anterior half;
terga 3 and 4 black with concave yellow fascia on
anterior half of the tergum, emarginate posteromedi-
ally, more strongly on tergum 4; tergum 5 black with
two triangular yellow maculae joined medially; sterna
1 and 2 yellow, sterna 3 and 4 yellow on anterior half
and black on posterior half, all of them yellow pilose
medially and black pilose laterally; sternum 5 yellow,
black pilose; genital segments brownish; male genita-
lia as in Figures 127 and 130.
Female: Similar to male except for normal sexual
dimorphism and as follows: black facial vitta less
evident; genal suture with black vitta less evident;
frons yellow with medial very diffuse black triangle
towards ocellar triangle reaching the posterior black
area or not, with black margin on posterior third;
occiput yellow pilose. Scutum black with metallic
bluish pollinosity that looks as though it is divided
into three vittae, but could be uniformly fused;
anterior anepisternum yellow, notopleuron without
ventral black vitta, posterior anepisternum with
broader yellow fascia, about half; scutellum with
dorsomedial black macula more diffuse; anepimeron
yellowish ventrally; protarsus brown; metafemur
yellowish on basal half; wing a little more bare
basally; abdominal tergum 2 with narrower and
longer yellow fascia narrowly interrupted medially;
terga 3 and 4 with fascia without emargination pos-
teriorly, broader laterally (Fig. 120).
Variation: Paratype male has no posterior emargin-
ation on fascia of terga 3 and 4; fascia appears
concave but complete. In some individuals the black
vitta on genal suture is less evident.
Females are more variable than males. The dark
female specimen collected on 15 December 1981 has
postpronotum brown; notopleuron black, yellow only
on anterior half; dorsum mainly black pilose; poste-
rior anepisternum with narrow yellow vitta; ane-
pimeron black; pro- and mesofemur brown on basal
one eighth to one sixth. The three paratype females
have similar frons with medial very diffuse broad
black macula that does not reach posterior black
area.
Length (N =5): Body, 8.0–8.6 (8.3) mm; wing, 7.2–8.3
(8.0) mm.
Geographical distribution: India.
Etymology: This new species is named after Marissa
Sendra i Peiró in her honour. She is the person who
gave me support since I started my career and
enjoyed and suffered with me in all my field expedi-
tions, museum visits, and life overseas. Species
epithet to be treated as a noun in apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Small species with medial
black facial vitta and wing extensively bare basally.
Citrogramma marissa has costal cell bare like
C. pendleburyi (Figs 131, 132), but it differs in having
basal wing cells bare and the angle between eyes
slightly narrower. Citrogramma marissa is only found
150 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
in north-east India, and C. pendleburyi is so far
known just from the Malay Peninsula.
Holotype male deposited in the National Museum
of Natural History (Washington D.C., USA) and
labelled: ‘INDIA: 2000/Arunachal Pradesh/Tirap
Dist./Hornbill Camp’ ‘Dec. 8.1981/Mary L. Ripley’
‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/marissa/det. X. Mengual
2009’ [red, second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: India: Arunachal Pradesh, Tirap Dist.,
Hornbill Camp, 610 m, 27°09N, 95°47E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype, as
above. Paratypes. INDIA: Arunachal Pradesh, Tirap
Dist., Hornbill Camp, 2000 ft, 9.xii.1981, Mary L.
Ripley [11, USNM];..., 8.xii.1981,...[1,
USNM];...,15.xii.1981,...[1, USNM].
CITROGRAMMA MATSUMURAI MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Xanthogramma fumipenne of Shiraki, 1930 (in part).
Description
Male: Head. Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose; gena yellow, yellow pilose;
lunule yellow; holoptic; frontal triangle yellow, black
pilose; angle between eyes approximately 115°
(Fig. 70); vertical triangle black, black pilose; ocelli
reddish; antenna brown, black pilose on scape and
pedicel; basoflagellomere brownish, dark dorsally;
arista brown; occiput black, yellowish pilose with
dark hairs on dorsal third.
Thorax. Scutum black, with lateral yellow vitta,
mainly yellow pilose; postpronotum yellow; notopleu-
ron yellow continuing until scutellum, yellow pilose;
postalar callus yellow, black and yellow pilose; scutel-
lum yellow, black pilose, subscutellar fringe of black
hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except katepisternum
black with large dorsal yellow macula, meron black,
katatergum black posteriorly, entirely yellow pilose;
metasternum pilose; calypter yellow; plumula yellow;
halter yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane hyaline, entirely microtri-
chose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow brownish; pro- and
mesofemur yellow; pro- and mesotibia yellow; metafe-
mur yellow on basal half to three fifths, black on
distal half to two fifths; metatibia black; tarsi black.
Abdomen: Figure 72. Parallel-sided, terga 3–5 mar-
gined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose dorsally and
laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and
tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal half;
tergum 1 black; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral
round yellow maculae, laterally extended forwards to
anterolateral tergum margin, yellow lateral margin
on anterior half; tergum 3 black with broad (about
half tergum length) straight yellow fascia with
margins parallel to edge of tergum; tergum 4 similar,
black with broad (about half tergum length) yellow
fascia broadened laterally with anterior margin
parallel to tergal edge and posterior margin slightly
curved; tergum 5 black with two broad yellow
maculae with lateral margin almost entirely yellow;
sterna yellow, yellow pilose; male genitalia small, as
in Figure 145.
Female: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose, dark brown pilose dorsolater-
ally; gena yellow, yellow pilose with brown hairs on
genal suture; lunule yellow; frons yellow with narrow
black area posteriorly making larger black area of
ocellar triangle, black pilose (Fig. 71); ocellar triangle
black, black pilose; ocelli reddish; antenna yellowish,
black pilose on scape and pedicel; basoflagellomere
dark dorsal; arista dark; occiput black, silver polli-
nose, yellow pilose.
Thorax: Scutum blackish, with lateral broad
yellow vitta, yellow pilose with black hairs scarcely
on dorsal section and on postalar callus; postprono-
tum yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until
scutellum, with postalar callus entirely yellow;
scutellum yellow, black pilose, with complete sub-
scutellar fringe of black hairs. Pleuron mostly
yellow, except katepisternum black ventrally and
meron black, entirely yellow pilose; metasternum
pilose; calypter yellow, with long yellow and short
dark hairs on margin; plumula yellow; halter
yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane light brown, entirely microt-
richose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow; pro- and mesofe-
mur yellow; pro- and mesotibia yellow; pro- and meso-
tarsus dark brown; metafemur yellow on basal two
thirds to three quarters, brown/dark on distal quarter
to third; metatibia dark brown with medial yellow
ring; metatarsus dark brown, black pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 73. Parallel-sided, slightly oval;
terga 3, 4, and 5 margined. Dorsum mainly black,
black pilose dorsally and laterally except tergum 1
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 151
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose
laterally on anterobasal third and dorsally on yellow
maculae; tergum 1 black, yellow laterally; tergum 2
black with two mesolateral round yellow maculae,
laterally extending forward to anterolateral tergal
margin (like ‘golf club’-shaped spots), yellow lateral
margin on anterior fifth; terga 3 and 4 black with
broad yellow fascia, about third of tergum length;
tergum 5 black with very broad yellow fascia with
posterior margin curved, widened laterally; sterna
mainly yellow, yellow, and black pilose.
Length (N =3): Body, 13.0–13.2 (13.1) mm; wing,
10.3–10.9 (10.6) mm.
Geographical distribution: Taiwan, New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet refers to Shonen Mat-
sumura (1872–1960), a pre-eminent Japanese ento-
mologist who worked mainly on the fauna of Japan
and Taiwan, and named more than 1200 new species
of insects. Species epithet to be treated as a noun in
apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Species with entire yellow face,
wing entirely microtrichose, anepisternum yellow and
anepimeron yellow. Citrogramma matsumurai is
similar to C. amarilla, from which differs by the
angle between eyes (approximately 100° or under in
C. amarilla), fifth tergum with a yellow fascia
(Fig. 67), and frons and abdominal pattern in females:
C. amarilla has frons completely yellow with poste-
rior black margin sinuate following ocellar triangle
(Fig. 66) and second abdominal tergum with yellow
fascia (Fig. 68).
Remarks: Matsumura described X. fumipenne based
on a single male from Horisha, Taiwan (Formosa)
(Matsumura & Adachi, 1916). Later, Shiraki (1930)
redescribed X. fumipenne and included a description
of the female. As mentioned above, there were three
different taxa within X. fumipenne of Shiraki (see
remarks under C. fumipenne). The female studied by
Shiraki (1930) is here transferred to a new species,
C. matsumurai Mengual sp. nov.
A full description of the male and female of C. mat-
sumurai is provided to clarify the morphology of this
species. The female from PNG keys out to C. mat-
sumurai, but I doubt her identity because scutellum
may have an unclear dark macula, indistinct because
of specimen condition. Hence, this female is not
included in the type material.
Holotype male deposited in the Museum of Com-
parative Zoology, Harvard University (Cambridge,
USA) and labelled: ‘Hori/Formosa/VI–6–34’ ‘L.
Gressitt/Collector’ ‘MCZ’ ‘Citrogramma/citrinum/
(Brunetti)/K. Ghorpadé det. 2009’ ‘HOLOTYPE/
Citrogramma/matsumurai/det. X. Mengual 2010
[red, second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Taiwan: Taiwan (Central Formosa),
Nantou Hsien (=Nantou County), Puli (=Hori–sha),
23°59N, 120°57E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.T
AIWAN: Taikan, 18.ix.1924, T.
Shiraki & J. Sonan. ‘Xanth. fumipenne Mats. Det. T.
Shiraki’ ‘Type’ [1, NIAS].
Nontype material. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: SE,
Mt Giluwe, 2500 m, 1.v.1963, J. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA NOTIALE VOCKEROTH, 1969
Citrogramma notiale Vockeroth, 1969: 95. Holotype:
, ANIC, by original designation. Type locality: Aus-
tralia: Brisbane. Vockeroth, 1969: 95, figs 16, 58;
Thompson & Vockeroth, 1989: 442.
Description
Male: See original description (Vockeroth, 1969: 95).
Female: Head: Face with small facial tubercle,
yellow with medial thin dark vitta, from oral apex
to antennal base, narrower than yellow lateral areas
of face, yellow pilose; gena yellow, yellow pilose,
white pollinose posteriorly; lunule yellow, brownish
medially; frons yellow with a medial triangular
black macula dorsad to lunule, black posteriorly and
laterally forming inverted V-shaped yellow fascia,
black pilose; vertical triangle black, black pilose;
ocelli reddish; antenna orangish, black pilose on
scape and pedicel; basoflagellomere orangish, dark
dorsally; arista dark; occiput black, silver pollinose,
golden pollinose dorsally, pale pilose on ventral two
thirds, golden yellow pilose on dorsal third with
black hairs.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial grey polli-
nose area with some metallic iridescence and two
anteroposterior bluish vittae, with lateral broad
yellow vitta, black and yellow pilose dorsally, yellow
pilose laterally on yellow vitta, densely yellowish
pilose on lateral notopleuron and supra-alar area;
postpronotum yellow, notopleuron yellow continuing
until scutellum, with postalar callus entirely yellow,
black and yellow pilose; scutellum yellow laterally
152 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
and anteriorly with dorsomedial semicircular defined
brown macula not reaching anterior margin, black
pilose, with a sparse subscutellar fringe of black
hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except posterior anepis-
ternum black on anterior half and dorsally, katepis-
ternum black with a dorsal yellow macula, meron
black, anterior anepimeron black dorsally, katater-
gum black posteriorly, entirely yellow pilose; metast-
ernum pilose; ventral calypter yellow with yellow
hairs on margin, dorsal calypter yellow, darkened
anterodistally; plumula yellow; halter pedicel yellow
with capitulum dark; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane hyaline, entirely microtri-
chose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than costal
cell and slightly broader than cell BM.
Legs: Pro- and metacoxa and trochanter yellow, meso-
coxa and mesotrochanter brownish; pro- and mesofe-
mur yellow, brownish posteriorly on distal two thirds;
pro- and mesotibia yellow; pro- and mesobasotarsom-
ere brownish yellow basally, dark distally, rest of tarsi
black; metafemur, metatibia, and metatarsi black.
Legs black pilose with yellow hairs on coxae; metafe-
mur with short, strong, rather setulose, anteroventral
and posteroventral hairs near apex.
Abdomen: Figure 23. Parallel-sided, broadening pos-
teriorly. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose dorsally
and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally
and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal
half; tergum 1 black, yellow laterally; tergum 2 black
with two mesolateral triangular yellow maculae,
yellow lateral margin on anterior half; terga 3, 4, and
5 black with medial broad (about third of tergum
length) yellow fascia slightly concave; terga 2, 3, 4,
and 5 with posterior narrow silver-dark pollinose
fascia on posterior margin; sterna yellow, black pilose.
Variation: Some female individuals have the ane-
pimeron entirely yellow. Female from the Bunya
Mountains has frons yellow medially, without clear
black macula.
Length (N =5): Body, 8.0–8.6 (8.2) mm; wing, 7.0–
7.8 (7.5) mm.
Puparium: Length 5.4 mm, width 3.2 mm (N=1).
Convexly inflated anteriorly, dorsoventrally flattened
posteriorly. Colour brownish beige (Figs 124, 125).
Pupal spiracles absent. Detail of posterior breathing
tube and spiracular openings in Figure 126.
Geographical distribution: Australia.
Ecology: Reared larva was collected from the plant
Ageratum houstonianum Mill. by C. J. Burwell.
Differential diagnosis: Small species with a narrow
black facial vitta and small facial tubercle, wing
entirely microtrichose, scutellum with a dark brown
macula not reaching anterior margin (Fig. 24),
metafemur black and male genitalia large. Citro-
gramma notiale is endemic to Australia, found in the
Brisbane (Queensland) and Sydney (New South
Wales) areas, and it is very similar to C. australe
Thompson sp. nov. Both species occur in the same
region and they only differ by male genitalia.
Although very similar morphologically, male genitalia
of these two species are completely different and
much modified (see Figs 138–139, 157). Citrogramma
arisanicum, from Taiwan, keys close to them but it is
very different: metafemur is mainly yellow, black on
distal third to two fifths; male genitalia small; and
scutellum has a brownish diffuse macula, in contrast
with the perfectly defined brown macula on scutellum
of the Australian species that does not reach anterior
margin.
Remarks: All the females studied in this revision are
identified as C. notiale based on the study of the
paratype specimen designated by the original author.
Females of C. notiale and C. australe, if any, might be
indistinguishable like the males. As the variation
seen amongst females does not follow any pattern and
none of them can be associated with males of C. aus-
trale, a full re-description is here given with notes
about variation.
There is only one Citrogramma puparium known
and the female imago belongs to C. notiale.
Holotype male deposited in the Australian National
Insect Collection, CSIRO (Canberra, Australia) and
labelled: ‘Brisbane, Qsld./AUST. 26.V.68/J.W.Boyes’
4Emerson/Toowong’‘Citrogramma/HOLOTYPE/
notiale/Vockeroth/No.’ [red] Citrogramma/notiale/
Vockeroth/HOLOTYPE /Reg. No./5760’ [red] ‘ANIC
Database No./29 014852’.
Type locality: Australia: Queensland, Brisbane,
27°28S, 153°01E.
Material examined: Type material. Paratype.A
USTRA-
LIA: Queensland, Brisbane, Toowong, 4 Emerson,
26.v.1968, J.W. Boyes [1, CNC].
Nontype material. AUSTRALIA: Queensland, Bris-
bane, 25.x.1953, F.M. Hull [1CNC]; . . . ,
24.x.1953,...[1, CNC]; Qld, Brisbane, C.F. Ashby
[1, ANIC];..., 30.vii.1939,...[1, ANIC];...,
6.viii.1939, . . . [1, ANIC];..., 3.vi.1941,...[1,
ANIC];..., 31.viii.1941,...[2, ANIC...,
13.ii.1960,...[1, ANIC];..., 3.vi.1962, ...[1,
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 153
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
ANIC];..., 24.viii.1941,...[1, ANIC];..., 14mi
SW of Sarina, 8.v.1955, K.R. Norris [1, CNC];...,
Mt Glorious, 8.xi.1969, J.K. Guyomar [15, ANIC;
1, USNM];..., 28.xii.1959, C.F. Ashby [1,
ANIC];..., 5.i.1963,...[1, ANIC];...,
6.xi.1965,...[2, ANIC];..., 16.xi.1965,...[2,
ANIC]; Qld, Bundaberg, viii–iv.1971, H. Frauca [1,
ANIC]; Qld, Lamington Nat. Park, Coomera River,
1200 ft, 28.v.1966, Z. Liepa [1, ANIC]; Qld, Bunya
Mountains, 19–21.xi.1967, J. & M. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM]; Queensland ‘Pres. by E. Brunetti. B.M. 1927–
184’ [1, BMNH]; Qld, Mount Nebo, Boombana Knob,
20.iii.1960, C. F. Ashby [2, ANIC]; Qld, Samsonvale
Cemetery, 8.5 km SSE Dayboro, 8.viii.1998, C.J.
Burwell, ex. Ageratum houstonianum, SEQ: 27°16S,
152°52E[1, QM]; Qld, Dayboro, 0.5 km S,
18–19.ix.1999, S.G. Evans 50152, SEQ: 27°12S,
152°49E[1, QM]; Qld, NW Bundaberg, 3.vi.1972,
H. Frauca [1, ANIC]; The Blunder, 16.ix.1967, C.F.
Ashby [1, ANIC]; Australian Capital Territory,
Cotter River, 23.xi.1956, S.J. Paramonov [1, ANIC];
New South Wales, Tooloom, 26.i.1926 [1, ANIC];
NSW, Lindfield, 33.46S, 151.11E, 11.vii.1982, M.
Stevens [1, ANIC]; NSW, 4 m. N of Bateman’s Bay,
14.x.1965, Z. Liepa [1, ANIC]; NSW, Kuringai
Chase, 8.xi.1967, J. & M. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; NSW,
Castle Hill, 17.viii.1911, A. White, B.M. 1917–104
[1, BMNH].
CITROGRAMMA PENDLEBURYI (CURRAN, 1928)
Syrphus pendleburyi Curran, 1928: 206. Holotype: ,
BMNH, by original designation. Type locality: Malay-
sia: Gunong Tahan. Curran, 1928: 199, 206, 1931a:
313.
Citrogramma pendleburyi of Knutson et al., 1975:
311; Wyatt, 1991: 155, 157.
Geographical distribution: Malay Peninsula
(Pahang).
Differential diagnosis: Species very similar to
C. marissa, with black facial vitta and costal cell bare.
Citrogramma pendleburyi differs in having wing
much more microtrichose basally (only cell CuP bare
on anterior margin) (Fig. 131; see Fig. 132) and a
slightly broader eye angle (about 110°). Citrogramma
marissa is only known from southern India and it is
smaller than C. pendleburyi. Other morphological dif-
ferences are the shape of yellow maculae on tergum 2
and the size of dark scutellar macula, much broader
and more rounded in C. marissa (see Figs 119, 121).
Remarks: Species only known from the holotype male
(Fig. 121).
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘MALAY PENIN:/Pahang,
F.M.S./Gunong Tahan/Seat Point 5460/Dec: 21st 1922/
H.M. Pendlebury’ ‘EX COLL:/F.M.S./Museum.’ [back
of the label] ‘Pres by/Fed. Maly States/Museum/B.M.
1934–74’ ‘TYPE/Syrphus/pendleburyi/No. Curran
[red, handwritten by Curran] ‘Holo–/type’ [red, round]
‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/pendleburyi (Curran)/det.
X. Mengual 2009’.
Type locality: Malaysia: Pahang State, Taman Negara
National Park, Mount Tahan, 1664 m, 4°37N,
102°14E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above.
CITROGRAMMA PENNARDSI MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, dark brown pilose with yellow hairs laterally
and ventrally, white pollinose laterally; gena yellow,
brown pilose, yellow pilose posteriorly; holoptic;
lunule yellowish; frontal triangle yellow, black pilose;
vertical triangle black, black pilose (Fig. 9); ocelli
reddish; antenna dark, black pilose on scape and
pedicel; basoflagellomere dark; arista black; occiput
black, silver pollinose, white pilose on ventral half,
golden-yellow pilose on medial quarter and black
pilose dorsally.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area uni-
formly metallic bluish pollinose, with lateral yellow
vitta, black pilose except notopleuron yellow pilose
on anterior half, densely black pilose on lateral
notopleuron and supra-alar area; postpronotum
yellow, brownish anteriorly; notopleuron yellow con-
tinuing until scutellum, with postalar callus entirely
yellow; scutellum yellow with very diffuse dorsome-
dial triangular brownish macula reaching the
posterior margin, black pilose, with complete sub-
scutellar fringe with black hairs. Pleuron mostly
yellow, except posterior anepisternum black on ante-
rior half, katepisternum dark with dorsal yellow
macula, anepimeron blackish posteriorly, and meron
dark, entirely yellow pilose, silver pollinose; metast-
ernum pilose; calypter yellow with yellow and black
hairs on margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spi-
racular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brownish yellow, entirely
microtrichose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader
than cell BM.
154 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Legs: Coxa yellow, trochanter brown, yellow and black
pilose; pro- and mesofemur brown, yellow on distal
third to half; pro- and mesotibia yellow, black pilose;
pro- and mesotarsus black; metaleg dark brown or
black, black pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 8. Parallel-sided; terga 3 and 4
margined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose dor-
sally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose
laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on
anterobasal half and medially on yellow maculae;
tergum 1 black, yellow laterally; tergum 2 black
with two mesolateral round yellow maculae, later-
ally extending forward to anterolateral tergal
margin (like ‘golf club’-shaped spots), yellow lateral
margin on anterior third to half; tergum 3 black
with anterior sinuate broad yellow fascia (about half
of tergum length), with anterior and posterior fascia
margins pointed forward medially and fascia not
reaching lateral margins; tergum 4 similar, black
with yellow fascia reaching lateral margins, with
lateral margin yellow on anterior half; tergum 5
similar to tergum 4, black with a sinuate broad
yellow fascia but lateral margin yellow on anterior
three quarters; sterna yellow, black pilose except
sterna 1 and 2 yellow pilose and sternum 3 yellow
pilose medially; genital segments yellowish; male
genitalia broad modifying posterior margin of
sternum 4, cerci large, as in Figures 10, 147, and
148.
Female: Unknown.
Variation: Paratype male has pleuron a bit lighter
with posterior anepisternum more pollinose making
the dark anterior half less evident. The same for
anepimeron that looks more yellow because of polli-
nosity. Lunule of both males is yellow, but it looks
darker in the holotype specimen because of the drying
process.
Length (N =2): Body, 10.0–10.2 (10.1) mm; wing,
10.5–10.9 (10.7) mm.
Geographical distribution: Java.
Etymology: This new species is named after Gerard
Pennards, a Dutch entomologist and syrphidologist
who helped me very much while going through the
Leiden Museum collection and sorting syrphids for
my studies. He worked very hard with the collection
during a special period of time for him because his
daughter Amalia Lynn was born in the course of this
study. Species epithet to be treated as a noun in
apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Species with yellow face,
yellow gena, posterior anepisternum partly black,
scutellum with a diffuse dark macula, metafemur
black and large male genitalia. Very distinct from
C. schlingeri although they key together, but C. pen-
nardsi has very large male genitalia and pro- and
mesofemur yellow, brown on basal third to half.
Remarks: Species known from only two male
individuals collected on the same day at the same
locality.
Holotype male deposited in the Nationaal Nat-
uurhistorische Museum ‘Naturalis’ (Leiden, The Neth-
erlands) and labelled: ‘W. Java. Gedeh/Tjibodas
2400 m./Lebak Saät/29.VI.37/M. A. Lieftinck’ ‘Museum
Leiden/Syrphus/gedehanus/de meij./F. Keiser det.’
[third and fourth lines handwritten] ‘HOLOTYPE/
Citrogramma/pennardsi/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red,
second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Indonesia: West Java, near Tjibodas,
Mount Gedeh, Lebak Saät, 8°15S, 112°10E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratype.I
NDONESIA: W. Java, Gedeh Tjibo-
das, 2400 m, Lebak Saät, 29.vi.1937, M.A. Lieftinck
[1, RMNH].
CITROGRAMMA PINTADA MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, mainly yellow pilose, dark pilose dorsally
and laterally; gena yellow, brown pilose, white
pollinose posteriorly; holoptic; lunule brown; frontal
triangle yellow with medial small brown macula
pointed posteriorly and with posterior lateral
margin with black vitta from eye union until anten-
nal base level, black pilose; vertical triangle black,
black pilose (Fig. 63); ocelli brownish; antenna
brownish, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere dark dorsally; arista brown; occiput
black, mainly silver pollinose, golden pollinose dor-
sally, yellowish-white pilose on ventral two thirds,
golden-yellow pilose on dorsal third with some black
hairs.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose with some metallic irides-
cence, with lateral yellow vitta, black pilose dorsally,
mainly black pilose laterally except notopleuron
yellow pilose anterodorsally, densely black pilose on
ventral notopleuron and supra-alar area; notopleuron
yellow continuing until scutellum; scutellum yellow
with dorsomedial broad brownish macula reaching
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 155
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
the posterior margin, black pilose, with complete
subscutellar fringe with black hairs. Pleuron mostly
yellow, except katepisternum black ventrally, meron
black and katatergum black posteriorly, entirely
yellow pilose; metasternum pilose; calypter yellow,
blackened basally and distally, with yellow and black
hairs on margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spi-
racular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brownish, lighter on posterior
margin, entirely microtrichose. Alula microtrichose,
broad, broader than costal cell and slightly narrower
than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow, yellow pilose; pro-
and mesofemur yellow, mainly black pilose, yellow
pilose basally; pro- and mesotibia dark yellow-
brownish, black pilose; pro- and mesotarsus dark
brown or black, clearly different from tibia; metafe-
mur dark, light brown on basal quarter, black pilose;
tibia and tarsus black, black pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 61. Parallel-sided; tergum 5 slightly
margined. Dorsum mainly matte black, except terga
2, 3, and 4 with a posterior shiny black fascia, black
pilose dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow
pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally
on anterobasal half; tergum 1 black, yellow laterally;
tergum 2 black with two mesolateral rounded yellow
maculae, laterally extending forward to anterolateral
tergal margin (like ‘golf club’-shaped spots), yellow
lateral margin on anterior half; terga 3 and 4 black
with slightly curved yellow fascia, about quarter of
tergum length, not reaching lateral margin; tergum 5
black with two subtriangular yellow maculae; sterna
yellow, yellow pilose with black hairs posteriorly;
genital segments yellowish; male genitalia brownish,
as in Figure 155.
Female: Similar to male except for normal sexual
dimorphism and as follows: lunule brown, yellowish
medially; frons yellow with medial brownish macula
dorsad to lunule extending dorsally and with broad
black vitta on lateral margin from ocellar triangle to
antennal bases, as wide as the distance between
posterior ocelli; metafemur more yellow basally, up to
half of femur length; abdominal tergum 2 with two
yellow maculae joined medially forming a narrow
fascia; terga 3 and 4 black with narrow yellow fascia
pointed forward and backward medially, not reaching
lateral margin; tergum 5 with slightly sinuate yellow
fascia (Fig. 62).
Variation: The pleural pilosity, in males and females,
ranges from entirely yellow to yellow pilose with
black hairs on posterior anepisternum and ane-
pimeron. There is a specimen with a slightly different
abdominal pattern, with yellow fascia on terga 3 and
4 with posterior margin emarginate medially. In the
female, the medial brown-orangish macula dorsad to
lunule can look less evident, and some specimens
have greater or lesser density of the black hairs on
notopleuron.
Length (N =5): Body, 9.2–10.0 (9.5) mm; wing, 8.0–8.8
(8.4) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Spanish pintado meaning painted, made-up (Brown,
1956: 219), and refers to the yellow frontal triangle of
males with a posterior black vitta from eye angle to
antennal base level. Species epithet to be treated as a
noun in apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Citrogramma pintada belongs
to a species group where the abdominal yellow fasciae
on terga 3 and 4 do not reach the lateral margins
(Figs 61, 62). Very similar to C. luteopleurum, differs
from it by having lunule brown and frontal triangle
with a black vitta dorsoposteriorly (Fig. 63). There is
a very different female from New Ireland Island
(PNG), named Citrogramma sp. 2, very similar to
C. pintada but that has supra-alar area densely
yellow pilose and yellow abdominal fasciae broader
(Figs 64, 65).
Citrogramma schlingeri,C. distinctum,C. triton,
C. luteifrons,C. pinyton,C. luteopleurum, and C. pin-
tada form a species group only known from New
Guinea. Species are very close morphologically and in
some cases only male genitalia can distinguish them,
e.g. C. pintada and C. pinyton.
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA (NE)/Wau, Morobe Distr./1200 m,
5.X.1962’ ‘J. Sedlacek/Malaise Trap/BISHOP’
‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/pintada/det. X. Mengual
2009’ [red, second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province,
Bulolo District, Wau, 1200 m, 70°20S, 146°42E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: Morobe Prov-
ince, Wau, 1200 m, 5.x.1962, J. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM];..., 1400 m, 20.xii.1961, . . . [11,
BPBM];..., 1250 m, 13.x.1962, . . .
[3, BPBM];...,1250 m, 11.viii.1965, Malaise trap,
J. & M. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; . . . , 1750 m,
8.ix.1965,...[1, BPBM];..., 1150m, vi.1971, M.
Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; Morobe Province, Mount
156 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Kaindi, 2350 m, 19.vii.1971, M. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM]; 6 km W of Wau, Nami Creek, 1700 m,
10.vi.1962, J. & M. Sedlacek [3, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA PINYTON MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
See description of C. pintada above. Morphologically,
C. pinyton and C. pintada are identical, with the
same variation in males and females. The only differ-
ences between them are the male genitalia (see
Figs 155, 156) and that specimens of C. pinyton
have more black hairs on anepisternum than those of
C. pintada.
Length (N =5): Body, 9.2–10.1 (9.7) mm; wing, 8.9–9.3
(9.0) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Greek pinytos meaning discreet, cautious (Brown,
1956: 457). Species epithet to be treated as neuter
adjective.
Differential diagnosis: As mentioned above, C. piny-
ton and C. pintada belong to the same species group,
but they can only be separated by male genitalia. The
females of C. pinyton were separated based on the
locality and dates because of the lack of morphological
differences with females of C. pintada.
The three males of C. pinyton were collected in
Bome (Goilala District, Central Province, PNG)
during March and April with other three females. The
males of C. pintada were collected in Wau and sur-
roundings (Bulolo District, Morobe Province, PNG)
from June to December, mainly in October. The locali-
ties of Wau and Bome are located at each side of
Owen Stanley Range, which divides the south-eastern
part of PNG in two slopes facing Coral Sea south and
Solomon Sea north. This central mountain-chain
has several high mounts, such as Mount Victoria
(4072 m), Mount Chapman (3376 m), and Mount
Albert Edward (3990 m). In some way, Owen Stanley
Range might have separated these two species in the
past so that they share adult morphology but not
male genitalia.
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA: PAPUA/Owen Stanley Range/
Goilala: Bome, 1950 m/III–16–31–1958’ ‘W.W. Brandt/
Collector/BISHOP’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/
pinyton/det. X. Mengual 2010’ [red, second and third
lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Central Province,
Goilala District, Bome, 1950 m, 8°16S, 147°4E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes. Owen Stanley Range, Goilala,
Bombe, 1950 m, 16–31.iii.1958, W.W. Brandt [12,
BPBM];...,16–30.iv.1958,...[11, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA QUADRATUM MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, yellow with
medial indefinite dark vitta, from oral apex to anten-
nal basis, narrower than yellow lateral areas of face,
mainly dark brown pilose, yellow pilose on ventral
portion, white pollinose laterally and ventrally; gena
yellow, mainly yellow pilose with a few brown hairs
on genal suture, white pollinose posteriorly; holoptic;
lunule dark, orangish medially; frontal triangle
yellow with anteromedial black triangular area
pointed posteriorly, black pilose; vertical triangle
black, black pilose; ocelli reddish; antenna dark
brown, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere dark, brownish ventrally; arista
black; occiput black, silver pollinose, yellow pilose
with some black hairs dorsally.
Thorax: Scutum dark, golden-grey pollinose with
three metallic bluish clearly defined vittae (median
vitta narrower), with lateral yellow vitta, black and
yellow pilose except notopleuron yellow pilose antero-
medially, densely black pilose on ventral notopleuron
and supra-alar area; postpronotum yellow; notopleu-
ron yellow, brownish ventrally, continuing until
scutellum with postalar callus entirely yellow; scutel-
lum yellow with dorsomedial broad brownish macula
reaching anterior margin, black pilose, complete sub-
scutellar fringe of dark brown hairs. Pleuron mostly
yellow, except katepisternum black ventrally, meron
dark, anepimeron dark, anterior anepisternum black-
ish posteriorly and posterior anepisternum black on
anterior half (brownish in holotype male), entirely
yellow pilose, yellowish white pollinose; metasternum
pilose; calypter yellow, darkened basally and distally
with dark hairs on margin; plumula yellow; halter
yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane yellowish, entirely microtri-
chose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Coxa yellow, trochanter brownish, yellow and
black pilose; pro- and mesofemur brownish, yellow
basally, mainly black pilose, yellow hairs basally; pro-
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 157
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
and mesotibia brown or darker; pro- and mesotarsus
dark brown, black pilose; metaleg dark brown or
black, black pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 18. Parallel-sided, narrowed poste-
riorly; terga 4 and 5 margined. Dorsum mainly
black, black pilose dorsally and laterally except
tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2
yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal quarter and
yellow pilose on maculae; tergum 1 black, yellow
laterally; tergum 2 dark brown-black with two
mesolateral broad, square yellow maculae, yellow
lateral margin on anterior half; tergum 3 blackish
with broad yellow fascia (about third to half of
abdomen length) with anterior margin pointed
forward medially, with anterior narrow black fascia;
tergum 4 blackish with yellow fascia narrower than
fascia on 3, with anterior narrow black fascia;
tergum 5 black with two small subtriangular yellow
maculae; anterior sterna yellow, yellow pilose,
sternum 4 black pilose, 5 and posterior sterna
darker, brown, black pilose; genital segments yellow-
ish in part; male genitalia as in Figure 150.
Female: Similar to male except: face yellow with
medial broad black vitta, dark pilose, yellow pilose on
ventral section; gena yellow, yellow pilose; frons
yellow with medial broad black vitta narrowing dor-
sally and reaching ocellar triangle, black laterally on
eye margin on dorsal half; occiput mainly yellow
pilose, black pilose on dorsal third; subscutellar fringe
less dense; pro- and mesofemur darker, brown.
Abdominal pattern different (Fig. 19): dorsum mainly
black, black pilose dorsally and laterally except
tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow
pilose laterally on anterobasal quarter; tergum 1
black, yellow laterally; tergum 2 black with two meso-
lateral broad yellow maculae joined medially forming
a broad yellow fascia narrowed laterally, occupying
more than half of tergum, reaching lateral margin
anteriorly with a medial black macula on anterior
margin of tergum 2; tergum 3 black with narrow
yellow fascia (about fifth of tergum length) expanded
medially anterior and posteriorly, occupying half of
tergum length; tergum 4 similar, black with narrow
yellow fascia (about fifth of tergum length) expanded
medially anteriorly and posteriorly but less, occupy-
ing one third of tergum length; tergum 5 black with
two lateral triangular yellow maculae pointed anteri-
orly; sterna yellow, mainly yellow pilose with black
hairs posteriorly.
Variation: The pleural pattern varies in males. The
male deposited at RMNH is lighter than the other
specimens, and it has anepimeron yellow and the
black areas of anepisternum look brownish, not as
clear as in the other males. The two individuals in
CNC are also a bit lighter than the specimens in
BPBM, but not like the male in RMNH.
The colour of anepimeron is variable, from yellow to
completely black, and it is probably because males
with yellowish or yellow and black anepimeron look
like immature adults. Some specimens have scutum
without bluish vittae as a result of preservation con-
dition. Colour of pro- and mesofemur is also variable
amongst specimens.
Length (N =5): Body, 8.7–9.5 (9.1) mm; wing, 8.2–9.2
(8.7) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from the
Latin quadratus meaning square, four-cornered
(Brown, 1956: 746), and refers to the square yellow
macula that this species has on the second abdominal
tergum. Species epithet to be treated as an adjective.
Differential diagnosis: Species very distinct with two
unusual square maculae on abdominal tergum 2 in
males (Fig. 18), and with medially broadened yellow
fasciae in females (Fig. 19). Citrogramma quadratum
can be related to other slender species such as C. rob-
ertsi or C. notiale by external morphology, but is easy
distinguishable by the characters mentioned above.
Remarks: Although it is the specimen with lightest
pleural pattern, the male in RMNH is the most
perfect. Metallic pollinosity can be easily seen on
this specimen, and antennae and legs are entire,
undamaged.
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
Nami Ck/10.VI.63’ [handwritten] ‘J. &M. Sedlacek/
Collectors/BISHOP’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/
quadratum/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and
third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province,
Wau, Nami Creek, 70°20S, 146°42E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: Morobe
Province, Mt Misim, 17.iii, Stevens [2, CNC];
16 km SW of Wau, Mt Kaindi, 2300 m, 8–9.vi.1962,
J. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; (NE) 6 km of Wau, Nami
Creek, 1700 m, 10.vi.1962, J. & M. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM]; Nami Creek, 10.vi.1962, J. & M. Sedlacek
[1, BPBM]; *Tresobul*, 2200 m, J. & M. Sedlacek
[1, BPBM]; NE, Daulo Pass, 2500 m, 2.v.1959,
C.D. Michener [1, BPBM]; INDONESIA: Papua
158 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Province, Iebele Camp, Neth. Ind.-American New
Guinea Exped., 2250 m, 3.xii.1938, L.J. Toxopeus
[1, RMNH].
CITROGRAMMA QUADRICORNUTUM VOCKEROTH, 1969
Citrogramma quadricornutum Vockeroth, 1969: 96.
Holotype: , BPBM, by original designation. Type
locality: Papua New Guinea: Wau. Vockeroth, 1969:
96, fig. 95; Thompson & Vockeroth, 1989: 442; Wyatt,
1991: 155, 157.
Description
Male: See original description in Vockeroth (1969:
96–98).
Female: Very similar to male: face yellow, medially
shiny and laterally white pollinose; gena yellow, with
a black macula on genal groove; frons yellow with
medial broad black vitta narrowing dorsally, with
bluish metallic iridescence, not reaching ocellar tri-
angle, black laterally on eye margin on dorsal half,
forming a narrow inverted V-shaped yellow macula;
antenna orange, basoflagellomere dark dorsally;
lunule yellow. Pleuron mostly yellow, except katepis-
ternum black with dorsal yellow macula, posterior
anepisternum black on anterior half, meron black,
anterior anepimeron black, and katatergum black
posteriorly. Metasternum bare. Scutellum yellow with
dorsal broad dark macula reaching anterior margin.
Coxa and trochanter yellow; pro- and mesolegs yellow
except tarsi dark; metaleg black. Same scutum and
abdominal pattern as in male, with yellow fasciae
narrower and two triangular yellow maculae joined
medially on tergum 2 (Fig. 43). Abdomen a bit
broader.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Diagnosis: Very distinct species with face entirely
yellow and large male genitalia. Citrogramma quad-
ricornutum is the only species of this genus with
metasternum bare, and it also has scutellum with a
broad defined black macula, scutum with two metallic
bluish vittae, and abdominal terga 2, 3, 4, and 5 with
posterior bluish metallic dark vittae (Figs 42, 43). In
general, C. quadricornutum is a small species with
the most extensive bluish metallic areas in its body,
on frons, scutum, pleuron, and abdomen.
Remarks: Vockeroth (1969) did not describe the
female of this species. A short description of the
only female studied, deposited in the BMNH, is here
provided.
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA: NE/Wau, 1250 m/10.V.1965’
‘J. Sedlacek/Collector/BISHOP’ ‘HOLOTYPE/
Citrogramma/quadricornutum/Vockeroth’ [red, hand-
written except first line].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province,
Bulolo District, Wau, 1250 m, 70°20S, 146°42E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratype.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: Morobe Prov-
ince, Wau, 1400 m, 20.xii.1961, J. & J.H. Sedlacek
[1, CNC]; (NE) 6 km W of Wau, Nami Creek,
1700 m, 10.vi.1962, J. Sedlacek [1, BPBM].
Nontype material. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: NE, Wau,
1150 m, vi.1971, M. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; . . . ,
13.vii.1971,...[1, BPBM]; Wau, Kulolo Creek,
10.vi.1983, H. Roberts [11, BMNH].
CITROGRAMMA ROBERTSI WYATT, 1991
Citrogramma robertsi Wyatt, 1991: 161. Holotype: ,
BMNH, by original designation. Type locality: Papua
New Guinea: Bulolo. Wyatt, 1991: 156, 161, figs 1, 11.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, yellow with
medial dark vitta, from oral apex to antennal basis,
narrower than yellow lateral areas of face, black
pilose dorsal and medially, yellow pilose on ventral
portion, white pollinose laterally and ventrally; gena
yellow, mainly yellow pilose with little black hairs,
white pollinose posteriorly; holoptic; lunule dark;
frontal triangle yellow with anteromedial black trian-
gular area pointed posteriorly, black pilose; vertical
triangle black, slightly longer than eye contiguity
(1.3:1), black pilose (Fig. 27); ocelli reddish; antenna
dark brown, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere orangish, dark dorsally, oval; arista
black; occiput blackish, silver pollinose, white pilose
on ventral two thirds, golden-yellow pilose on dorsal
third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose with some metallic irides-
cence, with lateral yellow vitta and sublateral matte
black vitta, black pilose except notopleuron yellowish
pilose on anterior half and some scarcely distributed
yellow hairs on dorsum, densely black pilose on
lateral notopleuron and supra-alar area; postprono-
tum yellow, brownish anteriorly; notopleuron yellow
continuing until scutellum, with postalar callus
entirely yellow; scutellum yellow with dorsomedial
broad defined dark macula reaching anterior margin,
black pilose, with subscutellar fringe with black
hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except katepisternum
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 159
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
brownish ventrally and meron dark, entirely yellow
pilose; metasternum pilose; calypter yellow basally
and very blackened distally with long black hairs on
margin; plumula yellow, long, about twice as long as
subalare; halter yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane infuscate, brown, entirely
microtrichose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader
than costal cell and slightly narrower than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow, yellow pilose except
metacoxa and metatrochanter black and yellow
pilose; pro- and mesofemur yellow on basal half to
third, black on distal half to two thirds; metafemur
black, only dark yellowish at the very basal section;
tibiae and tarsi black; femora, tibia and tarsi black
pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 26. Parallel-sided; tergum 3 weakly
margined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose dorsally
and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally
and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal
half; tergum 1 black, yellow laterally; tergum 2 black
with two mesolateral round yellow maculae, laterally
extending forward to anterolateral tergal margin (like
‘golf club’-shaped spots), yellow lateral margin on
anterior half; terga 3 and 4 black with narrow sinuate
yellow fascia on anterior half of tergum, resembling
result of union of two slightly concave maculae;
tergum 5 black with two small narrow subtriangular
yellow maculae; terga 2, 3, 4, and 5 with posterior
shiny black fascia on posterior margin; sterna yellow,
sterna 1 and 2 yellow pilose, everywhere else black
pilose; genital segments brownish; male genitalia
brown, as in Figure 149.
Female: Similar to male except for normal sexual
dimorphism and as follows: face yellow pilose ven-
trally, yellow pilose with some black hairs medially
and black pilose dorsally; occiput pale pilose on
ventral half, golden yellow pilose on dorsal half with
some golden hairs ventrally and black dorsally on
dorsal part; frons with anteromedial triangular black
area extended posteromedially, lateral yellow areas
converging posteriorly creating an inverted Y-shaped
area (Fig. 28); notopleuron mainly yellow pilose, black
pilose on lateral margin; abdominal tergum 2 with
narrow yellow fascia (similar to fascia on terga 3 and
4) narrowly interrupted medially and laterally
extending forward to anterolateral tergal margin,
with lateral margin yellow on anterior half; abdomi-
nal tergum 5 with two narrow, almost horizontal,
yellow maculae, which may look like a fascia inter-
rupted medially, extending anteriorly on lateral
margin (Fig. 25).
Variation: Some specimens have isolated black hairs
(three or four hairs and never together as a tuft) on
anterior anepimeron and posterior margin of anepis-
ternum. Females are rather similar to the description
of the holotype (see Wyatt, 1991: 161), but medial
dark facial vitta varies from very dark to light brown
although it is always visible. A few specimens also
have some black hairs on anterior anepimeron and/or
on posterior margin of anepisternum. Specimens may
also have a continuous macula like a yellow fascia on
abdominal tergum 2, with a narrow discontinuity not
visible.
There are darker specimens with posterior anepis-
ternum dark on anterior half, ranging from brown to
black. Dark specimens usually have katepisternum
darker ventrally and katatergum black posteriorly.
Some of these dark individuals have yellow irides-
cence and yellow pollinosity on anepisternum and
anepimeron; thus, they could look yellow. Dark indi-
viduals do not match with the description ‘Pleurae
with large continuously yellow area’ as stated by
Wyatt (1991: 161). This area is shown in Wyatt (1991:
168, fig. 1) by a stippled area.
Length (N =5): Body, 8.2–10.1 (9.4) mm; wing, 7.8–
9.75 (8.3) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Ecology: Female holotype was collected ‘in logged
forest’.
Differential diagnosis: Small, slender species with
abdomen almost parallel-sided. Species with wing
infuscated, scutellum yellow with triangular black
macula reaching anterior margin, and legs dark
brown except pro- and mesofemur yellow basally. Cit-
rogramma robertsi has abdomen with very narrow
yellow fasciae (Figs 25, 26), and male frontal triangle
yellow with posterior margin with a narrow black
vitta (Fig. 27), character not shared with other
species like C. pendleburyi,C. vockerothi,C. circum-
datum,C. hervebazini, and C. solomonense.
Remarks: Wyatt (1991) based his new species, C. rob-
ertsi, on a single female deposited in the BMNH. I
provided here a complete description of the male, as
several were found in other museum collections.
Holotype female deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘PAPUA NEW GUINEA:/
Bulolo,/Gumi Logging Area/9V1983/H. Roberts
[handwritten] ‘HOLO–/TYPE’ [round, red] ‘HOLO-
TYPE of/Citrogramma/robertsi n.sp./det. N.P.
Wyatt 1989’.
160 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province,
Bulolo District, Gumi Logging Area, 70°20S,
146°42E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above.
Nontype material. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: E. High-
lands Prov., Mt Gahavisuka Prov. Park (NW of
Goroka), Lipizuga Cr., c. 2200 m, 12–17.viii.1983, S.
& P. Miller [34, USNM]; Eastern Highlands
District, no. 9, Kimi Creek Camp, NE slopes Mt
Michael, 1980 m, 27.viii.1959, L.J. Brass, Coll. Sixth
Archbold Exped. to Papua New Guinea [3, AMNH];
Morobe Distr., Mt Misim, 17.iii, Stevens ‘Frank M.
Hull Collection C.N.C. 1973’ [1, CNC]; Morobe
Distr., Wau, 1400 m, 20.xii.1961, J. & J.H. Sedlacek
[12, BPBM];..., 16.vi.1961,...[1, BPBM]: 6
km W of Wau, Nami Creek, 1700 m, 10.vi.1962, J.
Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; Morobe, Nami Creek,
10.vi.1962, J. & M. Sedlacek [1, BPBM];...,
10.vi.1962, Light trap,...[1, BPBM]; Okapa, 64 km
S of Kainantu, 1800 m., 29.ix.1959, T.C. Maa [1,
BPBM]; Eliptamin Valley, 1200–1350 m,
1–15.viii.1959, W.W. Brandt [21, BPBM]; Daulo
Pass area, 2500 m, 5.vii.1957, D.E. Hardy [1,
BPBM]; Iongai, 10 km E of Mt Albert Edward,
1450 m, 7.xi.1965, J. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; Mt
Kaindi, 2350 m, v.1968, N.L.H. Krauss [1, BPBM];
Wau, 1200–1450 m, 18.vi.1968, N.L.H. Krauss [1,
BPBM];..., vii.1968,...[1, BPBM]; Feramin,
150–120 m, 23–31.v.1959, W.W. Brandt [1, BPBM];
NW Wisselmeren, Enarotadi, 14.vii–4.viii.1962, J.
Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; Owen Stanley Range, Goilala,
Bome, 1950 m, 24.ii–7.iii.1958, W.W. Brandt [1,
BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA SCHLINGERI THOMPSON SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with low facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, with oral apex
slightly more prominent than antennal base, entirely
yellow, black pilose; gena yellow, dark pilose; lunule
yellow; holoptic; frontal triangle yellow with very
narrow posterior black vitta on eye margin, black
pilose; vertical triangle black, as long as eye contigu-
ity, black pilose, golden pollinose (Fig. 50); ocelli
reddish; antenna orangish brown, black pilose on
scape and pedicel; basoflagellomere orangish, dark
dorsally; arista brown; occiput black, silver pollinose,
pale pilose on ventral half, yellow pilose medially and
dark pilose on dorsal third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose without brightness, with a
lateral yellow vitta, black pilose except notopleuron
yellowish pilose on anterior third, densely black pilose
on ventral notopleuron and supra-alar area; post-
pronotum yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until
scutellum, with postalar callus entirely yellow, black
pilose; scutellum yellow with dorsomedial broad
round brown macula, black pilose, with sparse incom-
plete subscutellar fringe with black hairs. Pleuron
mostly yellow, except posterior anepisternum black on
anterior third, katepisternum black with dorsal
yellow macula, meron black, posterior anepimeron
black, katatergum black posteriorly, grey pollinose
ventrally, mainly yellow pilose, except anterior ane-
pimeron with little black hairs and anepisternum
black pilose on posterodorsal quadrant; metasternum
pilose; calypter yellow basally and very blackened
distally, with long black hairs on margin; plumula
yellow, long, about twice as long as subalare; halter
orangish; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brown, costal cell darker,
entirely microtrichose. Alula microtrichose, broad,
slightly broader than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter orangish brown, black and
yellow pilose; femur, tibia and tarsus black, except
pro- and mesofemur yellowish distally, and pro- and
mesotibia yellowish basally; black pilose; tibia
orange-yellow pollinose.
Abdomen: Figure 51. Parallel-sided, terga 3 and 4
margined. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose dorsally
and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally
and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on anterobasal
quarter; tergum 1 black, yellow laterally; tergum 2
black with two mesolateral yellow maculae, laterally
extended forward to anterolateral tergal margin and
pointed mesomedially, yellow lateral margin on ante-
rior quarter; terga 3 and 4 black with broad, about
third of tergum length, medially narrowed yellow
fascia, not reaching lateral margin; tergum 5 black
with narrower yellow fascia constricted medially;
sterna yellow, yellow pilose; male genitalia as in
Figure 141.
Female: See description of females under C. schlingeri
species group.
Variation: Species variable. Some specimens with pro-
and mesotibia lighter, dark brown. Pleura mostly
yellow pilose with black hairs on posterior anepister-
num, but some individuals with black hairs on ane-
pimeron too. The coloration of anepimeron is variable:
in some specimens, like the holotype, anepimeron is
yellow with a black macula on posterior section; other
specimens have several small black maculae on ane-
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 161
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
pimeron; and at the other extreme, there are speci-
mens with anepimeron black except dorsomedial
section yellow.
The specimen from Goilala has the black macula on
posterior anepisternum not well defined and it can
look yellowish.
Length (N =2): Body, 8.0–10.2 (9.1) mm; wing, 7.2–9.4
(8.4) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: This new species is named after Evert
Irving Schlinger in his honour. Schlinger has
worked mainly on the family Acroceridae (Diptera)
and has described several genera and dozens of
new species. I am particularly indebted to Evert
Schlinger and his foundation for the economic
support during my postdoctoral studies at the
National Museum of Natural History (Smithsonian
Institution). Species epithet to be treated as a noun
in apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Species with entirely yellow
face, gena yellow, broad frontal triangle (angle
more than 90°) with a narrow black fascia on eye
margin, costal cell darker than rest of wing mem-
brane (except stigma), brown macula on scutellum
and legs almost entirely black. Species difficult to
distinguish from others in its group, like C. distinc-
tum or C. triton, and it can only be separated by
male genitalia. Citrogramma pintada and C. pinyton
are very similar and they probably belong to the
same species group, but these have anepisternum
yellow.
Remarks: Originally, Thompson diagnosed this
new species during his stay at AMNH many
years ago. At the very beginning of this revision,
Chris provided two undescribed species, a male of
C. schlingeri and another male of C. distinctum,
clearly differentiated by the male genitalia and the
colour of the anepimeron. After the study of BPBM
material, only the male genitalia were noted as dif-
ferent and a third species, C. triton, was diagnosed
in this species group. Females are very difficult to
distinguish for each species based on male speci-
mens. Only females of C. pintada and C. pinyton
could be separated by the coloration of costal cell.
Thus, females of this species group are described
together.
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA: NE:/Mt Wilhelm, 2550–2700 m,/
10.VIII.1969’ ‘J.L. Gressitt & Mena,/Collectors/
BISHOP MUSEUM’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/
schlingeri/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and
third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: (Simbu, Western
Highlands and Madang provinces intersection), Mount
Wilhelm, 2550–2700 m, 5°4800′′S, 145°0200′′E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: Eastern High-
lands District, no. 6, Pengagl Camp, east slopes Mt
Wilhelm, 2770 m, 22–24.vii.1959, L. J. Brass [1,
AMNH]; Neth. Ind. –American New Guinea Exped.,
Top Camp 2100 m, 25.i.1939, L.J. Toxopeus [1,
RMNH]; NE: Ialibu, 2650–2900 m, J.L. Gressitt [1,
BPBM]; Kepilam, J. & M. Sedlacek [1, BPBM];
Owen Stanley Range, Goilala: Bome, 1950 m,
16–30.iv.1958, W.W. Brandt [1, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA SCHLINGERI SPECIES GROUP
Females of C. schlingeri,C. distinctum, and C. triton.
Description
Female: Head: Face with a low facial tubercle,
gradually sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally,
with oral apex slightly more prominent than anten-
nal basis, entirely yellow, black pilose; gena yellow,
dark pilose; lunule orange; frons yellow with medial
triangular brown pointed dorsoposteriorly not reach-
ing ocellar triangle, with posterior black vitta on eye
margin from ocellar triangle until antennal base,
leaving inverted V-shaped yellow area, black pilose;
vertical triangle black, black pilose; ocelli reddish;
antenna orangish brown, black pilose on scape and
pedicel; basoflagellomere darker dorsally; arista dark
brown; occiput black, silver pollinose, pale pilose on
ventral half, yellow pilose medially and dark pilose
on dorsal third.
Thorax: Scutum black with a dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose without brightness, with a
lateral yellow vitta, mainly yellow pilose with some
black hairs except notopleuron yellow pilose on
anteromedial half, densely black pilose on lateral
notopleuron, on supra-alar area and on postalar
callus; postpronotum yellow; notopleuron yellow con-
tinuing until scutellum, with postalar callus entirely
yellow; scutellum yellow with dorsomedial broad
brown macula, black pilose, with sparse incomplete
subscutellar fringe with black hairs. Pleuron mostly
yellow, except katepisternum black with a dorsal
yellow macula, meron black, katatergum black poste-
riorly, mainly yellow pilose except anterior ane-
pimeron with little black hairs, anepisternum black
pilose on posterodorsal quadrant; some specimens
162 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
with some black hairs on anepimeron; metasternum
pilose; calypter yellow, blackened distally and basally
with long black hairs on margin; plumula yellow;
halter yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brown, costal cell darker like
stigma, entirely microtrichose. Alula microtrichose,
broad, slightly broader than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter orangish yellow, pro- and
mesocoxa partly black in some specimens, black and
yellow pilose; pro- and mesofemur yellowish distally,
and pro- and mesotibia yellowish basally; black
pilose; tibia orange-yellow pollinose.
Abdomen: Figure 52. Parallel-sided, slightly nar-
rowed posteriorly. Dorsum mainly black, black pilose
dorsally and laterally except tergum 1 yellow pilose
laterally and tergum 2 yellow pilose laterally on
anterobasal quarter; tergum 1 black, yellow laterally;
tergum 2 black with two mesolateral yellow maculae
joined medially forming narrow fascia, extended for-
wards laterally to anterolateral tergal margin, yellow
lateral margin on anterior quarter; terga 3 and 4
black with anterior straight yellow fascia, with
margins parallel to anterior margin of tergum, not
reaching lateral margin; tergum 5 black with narrow
yellow fascia reaching lateral margin; sterna yellow,
mainly yellow pilose, black pilose posteriorly.
Variation: Female collected by Samuelson from Mt
Missim has tergum 2 with two yellow maculae (like
‘golf club’-shaped spots) separated medially.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Remarks: After reviewing all the available Citro-
gramma material, there is no doubt about the validity
of this taxon but it was not easy to refer these females
to any of the three different taxa related to the
C. schlingeri species group, i.e. C. schlingeri,C. dis-
tinctum, and C. triton. Females of C. pintada,C. piny-
ton,C. luteifrons, and C. luteopleurum are very close
to the females of the C. schlingeri species group. The
dark coloration of the costal cell is different and it is
very characteristic in C. schlingeri group females.
Material examined: Nontype material. PAPUA NEW
GUINEA: Wau, Mt Kaindi, 8000 ft, 10.vi.1968, J.W.
Boyes [1, CNC]; (NE) 6 km W of Wau, Nami Creek,
1700 m, 10.vi.1962, Malaise trap, J. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM]; NE Morobe Province, Mt Missim, 1900 m,
10–15.v.1967, G.A. Samuelson [1, BPBM]; NE Mt
Hagen, 5°48S, 143°57E. 3400 m, 6.vi.1966, J.L.
Gressitt [1, BPBM]; NE Mt Missim, 2800 m,
23.iv.1968, J. Sedlacek [1, BPBM]; Mt Wilhelm,
9200 ft, v.1963, W.W. Brandt [1, ANIC].
CITROGRAMMA SEDLACEKORUM VOCKEROTH, 1969
Citrogramma sedlacekorum Vockeroth, 1969: 99.
Holotype: , BPBM, by original designation. Type
locality: Papua New Guinea: Wau. Vockeroth, 1969:
99, fig. 94; Thompson & Vockeroth, 1989: 442; Wyatt,
1991: 155, 156.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Diagnosis: Species similar to C. bicornutum and
C. asombrosum, with black facial vitta and costal cell
microtrichose. Citrogramma sedlacekorum differs
from the others two species by male frontal triangle
with a medial triangular dark macula, lunule black
(Figs 12, 13), scutellum yellow with a medial dark
macula reaching anterior margin (Figs 11, 14) and
anal lobe bare basally. Citrogramma sedlacekorum
also has enlarged male genitalia, very singular, with
sternum 8 presenting three subcylindrical processes
(Fig. 154).
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA: (NE)/Wau, Morobe Distr./1400 m,
20.XII.1961’ ‘J. &J.H. Sedlacek/Collector/BISHOP’
‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/sedlacekorum/Vockeroth
[red, handwritten except first line].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province,
Bulolo District, Wau, 70°20S, 146°42E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratype.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: (NE) Morobe,
Wau, 1200 m, 5.x.1962, J. & J.H. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM].
Nontype material. PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Wau,
1200 m, 20.iii.1968, M. Sedlacek [1, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA SHIRAKII MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Xanthogramma fumipenne of Shiraki, 1930 (in
part).
Description
Male: Head: Face with small facial tubercle, gradu-
ally sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose except black pilose dorsally;
gena yellow, yellow pilose with some brown hairs on
genal suture, white pollinose posteriorly; holoptic;
lunule dark yellow; frontal triangle yellow with
anteromedial black macula, black pilose; vertical tri-
angle black, slightly longer than eye contiguity,
black pilose; ocelli reddish; antenna orangish brown,
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 163
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
black pilose on scape and pedicel; basoflagellomere
dark dorsally; arista black; occiput black, golden pol-
linose, white pilose on ventral half, yellow pilose on
dorsal half.
Thorax: Scutum black, black and yellow pilose dorso-
medially, with lateral yellow vitta; postpronotum
yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until scutel-
lum, yellow pilose; postalar callus yellow, black pilose;
scutellum yellow, black pilose, with complete sub-
scutellar fringe with black hairs. Pleuron mostly
yellow, except posterior anepisternum black on ante-
rior third, katepisternum black with dorsal yellow
macula, meron black, posterior anepimeron black dor-
sally, entirely yellow pilose, white-grey pollinose on
black areas; metasternum pilose; calypter yellow,
blackened dorsally with dark and yellow hairs on
margin; plumula yellow; halter yellow; spiracular
fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane light brown, entirely microt-
richose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than cell
BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow except mesocoxa
and mesotrochanter dark; pro- and mesofemur yellow;
pro- and mesotibia yellow; pro- and mesotarsus
brown-dark; metafemur yellow, black on distal
quarter; metatibia and tarsus black.
Abdomen: Figure 78. Parallel-sided, dorsum mainly
black, black pilose dorsally and laterally except
tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow
pilose laterally on anterobasal half; tergum 1 black,
yellow laterally; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral
round/subtriangular yellow maculae, laterally extend-
ing forward to anterolateral tergal margin (like ‘golf
club’-shaped spots), yellow lateral margin on anterior
fifth; terga 3 and 4 black with broad yellow fascia,
about one third to two fifths of tergum length; tergum
5 black with broad yellow fascia, about half of tergum
length; terga 2, 3, 4, and 5 with anterior narrow black
fascia; sterna yellowish, black and yellow pilose; male
genitalia large, as in Figure 152; surstylus with long
erected yellowish hairs.
Female: Unknown.
Length (N =1): Body, 10.1 mm; wing, 8.8 mm.
Geographical distribution: Taiwan.
Etymology: The specific epithet honours Tokuichi
Shiraki (1882–1970), a Japanese entomologist who
worked mainly on Diptera and described new species
of Citrogramma in his comprehensive review of Syr-
phidae occurring in the Sino-Malayan subregion,
including the Indochinese peninsula, Taiwan, and
Japan, as well as Palaearctic eastern China and
Siberia (Shiraki, 1930). Species epithet to be treated
as a noun in apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Citrogramma shirakii can be
easily separated based on male genitalia. There is no
other species with surstylus with long yellow hairs
except C. hervebazini, but that species has yellow face
with medial black vitta, scutellum with black macula,
metafemur black, and halter capitulum black. Male
genitalia of C. shirakii and C. hervebazini are very
similar (see Figs 151, 152), but C. hervebazini has
larger superior lobes and surstylus with a larger
basoanterior protuberance bearing long yellow hairs.
Although C. shirakii has male genitalia similar to
C. hervebazini, it keys out with C. frederici sp. nov.,
which also has yellow face, posterior anepisternum
partly black anteriorly, metafemur yellow basally, and
frontal triangle more than 90°. Citrogramma shirakii
differs from C. frederici in male genitalia and wing
microtrichia.
Remarks: Shiraki (1930) originally identified the
holotype specimen as C. fumipenne (Matsumura,
1916). Citrogramma shirakii differs from C. fumi-
penne by having posterior anepisternum partly
black and anterior anepimeron yellow; whereas
C. fumipenne has anepisternum yellow and ane-
pimeron black except dorsomedial portion. Addition-
ally, the genitalia of C. fumipenne are very small
compared with the one of C. shirakii and with no
long hairs on surstylus.
Holotype male deposited in the Natural Resources
Inventory Center (National Institute for Agro-
environmental Sciences, Ibaraki, Tsukuba, Japan)
and labelled: ‘Formosa/Karenko, -19/VII 20–VIII 4./T.
Okuni,/J. Sonan,/K. Miy., M. Yosh.’ ‘Xanth. Mats/
fumipenne/Det. T. Shiraki’ [handwritten except
third line] ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/shirakii/
det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and third lines
handwritten].
Type locality: TAIWAN: Hualien County, Hualien City
(=Karenko), 23°5820′′N, 121°3623′′E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above.
CITROGRAMMA SOLOMONENSE WYATT, 1991
Citrogramma solomonensis Wyatt, 1991: 162. Holo-
type: , BMNH, by original designation. Type local-
ity: Solomon Islands: Jonapau. Wyatt, 1991: 157, 162,
figs 4, 8.
164 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Description
Male: See original description in Wyatt (1991: 162).
Female: Head. Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, yellow with
medial black vitta, from oral apex to antennal basis,
narrower than yellow lateral areas of face, yellow
pilose, dark pilose laterodorsally, white pollinose lat-
erally; gena yellow with a dark macula medially on
genal groove, ventrad to eye, mainly yellow pilose
with dark hairs on the dark macula, white pollinose
posteriorly; lunule dark; frons yellow with medial
triangular dark brown macula towards ocellar tri-
angle not reaching posterior black area, black
lateral margin on posterior half forming a yellow
inverted V-shaped vitta, black pilose; vertical tri-
angle black, black pilose; ocelli reddish; antenna
brownish, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere dark dorsally; arista black; occiput
black, mainly silver pollinose, golden pollinose dor-
sally, yellow pilose on ventral two thirds, black
pilose on dorsal third.
Thorax: Scutum black with dorsomedial area almost
uniformly grey pollinose with some metallic irides-
cence, with lateral yellow vitta and sublateral matte
black vitta, black pilose dorsally, postpronotum,
notopleuron and supra-alar area yellow pilose, posta-
lar callus black pilose, densely yellow pilose on lateral
notopleuron and supra-alar area; postpronotum
yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until scutel-
lum, with postalar callus entirely yellow; scutellum
yellow with dorsomedial broad defined triangular
black macula reaching posterior margin, black pilose,
with complete subscutellar fringe with black hairs.
Pleuron mostly yellow, except posterior anepisternum
black on anterior half, katepisternum black with a
dorsal yellow macula, meron black, katatergum
blackish posteriorly, entirely yellow pilose; metaster-
num pilose; calypter yellow, blackened basally, with
yellow and black hairs on margin; plumula yellow;
halter yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane brownish, entirely microtri-
chose. Alula microtrichose, broad, broader than costal
cell and slightly narrower than cell BM.
Legs: Pro- and metacoxa and trochanter brownish,
metacoxa and trochanter black; pro- and mesofemur
and tibia yellow; pro- and mesotarsus dark; metaleg
black, metafemur brownish basally.
Abdomen: Figure 40. Parallel-sided, slightly oval;
terga 2, 3, 4, and 5 clearly margined. Dorsum mainly
black, black pilose dorsally and laterally except
tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow
pilose laterally on anterobasal half; tergum 1 black,
yellow laterally; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral
curved yellow maculae, laterally extending forward to
anterolateral tergum margin, yellow lateral margin
on anterior two fifths; terga 3 and 4 black with
sinuate yellow fascia on anterior half of the tergum,
about third of tergum length, pointed forward medi-
ally and on lateral margin, not narrowed laterally;
tergum 5 black with a yellow fascia, broader laterally.
Variation: There are significant differences between
males and females. In males, the frontal triangle is
yellow with a medial triangular black macula
pointed dorsally; the dorsal part of the occiput is
yellow pilose; anepisternum black (Fig. 31); and coxa
and trochanter are black. Amongst the males, the
extension of the black macula on genal groove
varies (Fig. 38). In male specimens in perfect condi-
tion, the pollinose area of scutum has two black
vittae. Female specimen has the scutum broken and
pollinose area is not clear.
Length (N =5): Body, 11.0–11.6 (11.2) mm; wing, 9.0–
9.9 (9.4) mm.
Geographical distribution: Solomon Islands, Papua
New Guinea (Boungainville and New Britain islands).
Differential diagnosis: Species with a black facial
vitta, wing entirely microtrichose, scutum with broad
lateral yellow vitta, scutellum yellow with a black
macula (Figs 39, 40), katepisternum with a dorsal
large yellow macula, and pro- and mesofemur yellow.
Citrogramma solomonense is similar to C. hervebazini
but C. solomonense has yellow gena with a black
macula on genal groove (Fig. 38), halter entirely yel-
lowish, notopleuron and supra-alar area yellow pilose
(Fig. 31), and small male genitalia.
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘SOLOMON IS./
Guadalcanal/Jonapau/29:vi:1956/E.S. Brown/5380
[sixth line in vertical] ‘HOLO–/TYPE’ [red, round]
HOLOTYPE of/Citrogramma/solomonensis n.sp./
det. N.P. Wyatt 1989’.
Type locality: Solomon Islands: Guadalcanal Province,
Mount Chaunapaho (=Jonapau), 9°37S, 160°07E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype, as above.
Paratypes.S
OLOMON ISLANDS: Guadalcanal Province,
Jonapau, 29.vi.1956, E.S. Brown [2, BMNH]
Nontype material. SOLOMON ISLANDS: Guadalca-
nal, Suta (Suta-Gold Ridge), Mt Jonapau, 1000 m,
29.vi.1956, J.L. Gressitt [3, BPBM]; PAPUA NEW
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 165
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
GUINEA: Bougainville Island (=North Solomons),
Kokure, 690 m., 11.vi.1956, E.J. Ford, Jr. [2,
BPBM];..., 8.vi.1956,...[1, BPBM];...,
12.vi.1956,...[1, BPBM];...,14.vi.1956,...[1,
BPBM];..., 15.vi.1956,...[1, BPBM];...,
17.vi.1956,...[1, BPBM];...,21.vi.1956,...[1,
BPBM]; Bougainville Island, Guaba, 720 m,
19.vi.1956. E.J. Ford, Jr. [1, BPBM]; West New
Britain Province, Gisiluva, Nakanai Mts., 1050 m,
25.vii.1956, E.J. Ford, Jr. [1, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA TRITON MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
Male: See description of C. schlingeri and C. distinc-
tum above. Morphologically, C. triton,C. schlingeri,
and C. distinctum are identical. The only remark-
able difference is the male genitalia (see Figs 141–
143).
Female: See description of females given above under
the C. schlingeri species group.
Length (N =2): Body, 9.6–10.2 (9.9) mm; wing, 9.2–9.8
(9.5) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet is derived from
the Greek tritos meaning third (Brown, 1956: 798),
and it refers to the fact that it is the third species
found with the same adult morphology and different
male genitalia. Species epithet to be treated as
adjective.
Differential diagnosis: See comments on C. schlingeri
and C. distinctum above. Species with entirely yellow
face, gena yellow, broad frontal triangle (eye angle
more than 90°) with a narrow black fascia on eye
margin, costal cell darker than the rest of the wing
membrane (except stigma), brown macula on scutel-
lum and legs almost entirely black. As mentioned,
this species is difficult to distinguish from others in
its group, like C. schlingeri or C. distinctum; only
male genitalia are different. Citrogramma pintada
and C. pinyton are very similar and they probably
belong to the same species group, but these have
anepisternum yellow.
Remarks: Thompson discovered two new species,
C. schlingeri and C. distinctum, while studying Citro-
gramma material at AMNH. After the study of BPBM
material, a third species with the same adult mor-
phology was found, C. triton. The three species are
known from New Guinea and only the male genitalia
are clearly different for each of them. Females of this
species group are described together. Probably they
are all a sympatric cryptic species complex, occurring
in the same geographical area.
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA: NE/Mt Shungol,/2700m, 31.V.1967’
‘J.L. Gressit/& P. Colman/BISHOP MUSEUM’
‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/triton/det. X. Mengual
2010’ [red, second and third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Morobe Province,
Mount Shungol (also known as Mount Chungol),
2700 m, 6°51S, 146°42E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratype.P
APUA NEW GUINEA: Enga Province,
Yaibos, 2030–2180 m, 11.vi.1963, J. Sedlacek [1,
BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA VARISCUTATUM (CURRAN, 1928)
Syrphus variscutatus Curran, 1928: 210. Lectotype.
, BMNH, designated by Wyatt (1991). Type locality:
Malaysia: Mount Tahan. Curran, 1928: 198, 210,
1931a: 313, 318, 1931b: 352.
Citrogramma variscutatum of Vockeroth, 1969: 95;
Knutson et al., 1975: 311.
Citrogramma variscutatus of Wyatt, 1991: 155, 158,
165.
Geographical distribution: Malay Peninsula
(Pahang), Sumatra, Java.
Diagnosis: Species with face yellow (Fig. 96), poste-
rior anepimeron partly black, scutellum yellow with a
sharply black macula (Figs 93, 100), pro- and mesofe-
mur black basally, and notopleuron yellow and black
pilose. Citrogramma variscutatum is morphologically
close to C. wyatti,C. fascipleurum,C. difficile, and
C. gedehanum, but all of them have pro- and mesofe-
mur entirely yellow and notopleuron only yellow
pilose.
Remarks: Some specimens have anterior anepister-
num partly black, whereas others have it entirely
yellow.
Lectotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘MALAY PENIN:/Pahang,
F.M.S./Gunong Tahan/65007100’/Dec: 14th 1921/
H.M. Pendlebury’ ‘EX COLL:/F.M.S./MUSEUM’ [back
of label] ‘Pres. by/Fed. Malay States/Museum./
B.M. 1934–74’ ‘HoloTYPE/Syrphus/variscutatus/No.
Curran’ [red, handwritten by Curran] ‘LECTOTYPE
of/Syrphus/variscutatum Curran/det. N.P. Wyatt
1989’.
166 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Type locality: Malaysia: Pahang State, Taman Negara
National Park, Mount Tahan, 1981–2164 m, 4°37N,
102°14E.
Material examined: Type material. Lectotype,as
above. Paralectotypes.M
ALAYSIA: Pahang, Cameron
Highlands, Gunong Berumbang, 6050 ft, 17.vi.1923,
H.M. Pendlebury ‘C.H. Curran Collection Aco. 31144’
[1, AMNH; 2, BMNH]; Pahang, Mt Tahan, 6500–
7100 ft, 15.xii.1921, H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH].
Nontype material. MALAYSIA: Pahang, Cameron
Highlands, Gunong Berumbang, 6040 ft, 26.vii.1938,
H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH];...,
23.vii.1938,...[1, BMNH]; Pahang, Cameron
Highlands, Gunong Batu Brinchang, 6665 ft,
14.v.1939, H.M. Pendlebury [1, BMNH]; Pahang,
Gunong Benom, 6000 ft, 4.viii.1925, J.H.N. Evans
[3, BMNH];..., 2.vii.1925,...[2, BMNH];
Pahang, Cameron Highlands, Mt Brinchang, 5000–
6600 ft, 26.iv.1941, J.A. Reid [2, BMNH]; . . . ,
6600 ft, 14.ii.1964, H.T. Pagden [1, BMNH];...,
1–9.i.1959, L.W. Quate [9, BPBM];..., 2–7.i.1959,
L.W. Quate [10, BPBM]; Cameron Highlands, Mt
Batu Brinchang, 2200 m, 10.iii.1963, M.A. Lieftinck
[1, RMNH];..., 6660 ft, 21.ix.1938, H.M. Pendle-
bury [1, BMNH]; Cameron Highlands, swept tree,
xi.1961, D.H. Murphy ‘A422–18’ [1, USNM]; INDO-
NESIA: Sumatra, Lampung, Mt Tanggamoes (=Tang-
gamus), 2100 m, 19–31.iii.1940, M.A. Lieftinck [1,
RMNH]; West Java, Tjibodas, Mt Gede, 4500 ft, 1909,
Bryant & Palmer [2, USNM];..., Pangrango,
3000 m., 24.xii.1919, *Dr C.* [1, ZMAN];...,
Mt Gede, 1500–2000 m, iv.1911 ‘Gedeh. JAVA/
Koningsberger/4.1911. 15002000 m’‘v. gedehanus
/??/det. de Meijere’ (handwritten except third line, de
Meijere) ‘Syrphus/gedehanus/de Meijere 1914/ZMAN
type DIPT.0989.3’ [1, ZMAN].
CITROGRAMMA VOCKEROTHI WYATT, 1991
Citrogramma vockerothi Wyatt, 1991: 160. Holotype:
, BMNH, by original designation. Type locality:
Malaysia: Mount Dulit. Wyatt, 1991: 157, 161, figs 2,
10, 12.
Geographical distribution: Malay Peninsula (Pahang),
Borneo, Java.
Diagnosis: Species with yellow face with a medial
black vitta (Fig. 32), wing entirely microtrichose,
scutellum with a triangular black macula (Fig. 30),
pro- and mesofemur yellow, and anterior anepimeron
black (Fig. 32). Citrogramma vockerothi is quite dis-
tinct from other species by having a pleuron pattern
much darker: katepisternum black with a dorsal
small yellow macula not reaching yellow area of
katepimeron; proepimeron mostly black with small
yellow macula; and anterior anepisternum black
(Fig. 32).
Holotype male deposited in The Natural History
Museum, formerly British Museum (Natural History)
(London, UK) and labelled: ‘SARAWAK:/Mt Dulit./
4000 ft./moss forest/19.x.1932.’ ‘Oxford Univ. Exp./
B.M. Hobby &/A.W. Moore./B.M. 1933–254’ ‘HOLO–/
TYPE’ [red, round] ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/
vockerothi/det. X. Mengual 2009’ [red, second and
third lines handwritten].
Type locality: Malaysia: Sarawak State (Borneo
Island), Kapit Division, Belaga District, Mount Dulit
(=Banjaran Dulit), 1219 m, 3°13N, 114°16E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratypes.M
ALAYSIA: Sarawak, Mt Dulit,
4000 ft, 13.x.1932, B.M. Hobby & A.W. Moore [1,
BMNH]; INDONESIA: West Java, Tjibodas, 4000 ft,
i.1936, L.E. Cheesman [1, BMNH].
Nontype material. Malaysia: Pahang, Fraser’s Hill,
x.1948, N.L.H. Krauss [1, USNM]; British N.
Borneo (=Sabah), W Coast Residency, Kundasan,
1240 m, 15.x.1958 [3, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA WYATTI MENGUAL SP.NOV.
Description
Male: Head: Face with facial tubercle, gradually
sloping dorsally, more abrupt ventrally, entirely
yellow, yellow pilose; gena yellow with broad dark
macula on genal groove, yellow pilose with brown
hairs on dark area, white pollinose posteriorly; hol-
optic; lunule yellow; frontal triangle yellow with
anteromedial orangish macula, broad (about 115°),
black pilose (Fig. 105); vertical triangle black, shorter
than eye contiguity, black pilose; ocelli dark; antenna
yellow, black pilose on scape and pedicel;
basoflagellomere yellowish, dark dorsally; arista
black; occiput black, golden pollinose, pale pilose on
ventral half, yellow pilose on dorsal half with black
hairs on dorsal quarter.
Thorax: Scutum black, black and yellow pilose dorso-
medially, with lateral broad yellow vitta; postprono-
tum yellow; notopleuron yellow continuing until
scutellum, notopleuron and supra-alar area densely
yellow pilose laterally; postalar callus yellow, black
pilose; scutellum yellow with medial broad black
macula reaching anterior and posterior margins,
black pilose, complete subscutellar fringe of black
hairs. Pleuron mostly yellow, except posterior anepis-
ternum dark brown on anterior half, katepisternum
black with dorsal yellow macula, meron black, ante-
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 167
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
rior anepimeron dark dorsally, katatergum dark pos-
teriorly, entirely yellow pilose; metasternum pilose;
calypter yellow, blackened dorsally with dark and
yellow hairs on margin; plumula yellow; halter
yellow; spiracular fringes yellow.
Wing: Wing membrane hyaline, stigma dark, entirely
microtrichose. Alula microtrichose, broad, slightly
broader than cell BM.
Legs: Coxa and trochanter yellow except mesocoxa
and mesotrochanter dark; pro- and mesofemur yellow,
brownish distally; pro- and mesotibia yellow; pro- and
mesotarsus dark; metafemur yellow, black on distal
half; metatibia and metatarsus black; black pilose
except basal femur and coxa yellow pilose.
Abdomen: Figure 103. Parallel-sided, dorsum mainly
black, black pilose dorsally and laterally except
tergum 1 yellow pilose laterally and tergum 2 yellow
pilose laterally on anterobasal half; tergum 1 black,
yellow laterally; tergum 2 black with two mesolateral
round yellow maculae, laterally extending forward to
anterolateral tergal margin (like ‘golf club’-shaped
spots), yellow lateral margin on anterior third;
tergum 3 with yellow fascia with anterior margin
parallel to tergal margin and posterior margin
slightly concave; tergum 4 black with straight yellow
fascia parallel to tergal margin; tergum 5 black with
two triangular yellow maculae; terga 2, 3, 4, and 5
with anterior narrow black fascia and posterior bright
pollinose vitta; sterna yellowish, black and yellow
pilose; male genitalia as in Figure 146.
Female: Similar to male except for normal sexual
dimorphism and as follows: frons yellow, orangish
medially, with lateral black vitta on dorsal half
forming a narrow vitta on anterior ocellus (Fig. 106);
lunule yellow; occiput yellow pilose on ventral two
thirds, black pilose on dorsal third; notopleuron and
supra-alar area densely yellow pilose ventrally, with
little black hairs dorsally (Fig. 106); abdominal
tergum 2 with narrow yellow fascia laterally extend-
ing forward to anterolateral tergal margin; terga 3
and 4 black with narrow straight yellow fascia, about
quarter of tergum length; tergum 5 with two trian-
gular yellow maculae joined medially; terga 2, 3, 4,
and 5 with posterior bright pollinose vitta on poste-
rior margin (Fig. 104).
Length (N =2): Body, 8.9–9.4 (9.1) mm; wing, 8.0–8.6
(8.3) mm.
Geographical distribution: New Guinea.
Etymology: The specific epithet honours Nigel Wyatt
(Curator of Diptera, BMNH, London, UK). This new
species is dedicated to him for his kindness and help
during my visit to the BMNH and as recognition of
his review of Citrogramma (Wyatt, 1991), which was
very useful during this revisionary work. Species
epithet to be treated as a noun in apposition.
Differential diagnosis: Species with face yellow, pos-
terior anepisternum partly black, scutellum yellow
with a broad black triangular macula reaching ante-
rior and posterior margins (Figs 103, 104), pro- and
mesofemur yellow and metafemur yellow on basal
half, and gena entirely yellow. Very similar to C. cur-
rani but that species has no black macula on genal
groove and its lunule is yellow.
Remarks: See comments on C. currani.
Holotype male deposited in the Bernice P. Bishop
Museum (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) and labelled:
‘NEW GUINEA: PAPUA/Owen Stanley Range/
Goilala: Loloipa/XI–25–XII–10–1957’ ‘W.W. Brandt/
Collector/BISHOP’ ‘HOLOTYPE/Citrogramma/
wyatti/det. X. Mengual 2010’ [red, second and third
lines handwritten].
Type locality: Papua New Guinea: Owen Stanley
Range, Central Province, Goilala District, Loloipa,
8°21S, 146°59E.
Material examined: Type material. Holotype,as
above. Paratype.I
NDONESIA: West Papua, Heuvelbi-
vak, 800 m, 7–15.xi.1909, Lorentz [1, ZMAN].
CITROGRAMMA SPECIES NOT FORMALLY DESCRIBED
More than 600 Citrogramma specimens were studied
for this revisionary paper. Most of them belong to
existing species or to new taxa described here, but a
few individuals did not match those hypotheses. As
mentioned, females of Citrogramma are more difficult
to identify and separate than males. When no male
was found to be associated with a different female
morphology, females were kept as formally unde-
scribed. Given below are three examples of such taxa.
CITROGRAMMA SP.B
Citrogramma sp. B of Wyatt, 1991: 166. Type locality:
Myanmar: Nam Tamai Valley. Wyatt,1991: 157 (ident.
key), 166 (descr.).
Geographical distribution: Myanmar.
168 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Diagnosis: Species with yellow face, anepisternum
and anepimeron yellow, yellow scutellum, abdomen
with a yellow fascia reaching lateral margins, pro-
and mesofemur yellow, and wing bare basally. Very
similar to C. clarum, but it has wing with larger bare
areas basally (Fig. 134).
Remarks: Only one female is known with this wing
microtrichia pattern (Fig. 134). Wyatt (1991) included
a male and a female, but only the female has wing
with large bare areas basally. The male was misiden-
tified, here named as C. amarilla. As Wyatt sug-
gested, this female is treated as a distinct
undescribed species, to be named and described when
more material, especially males, are procured for
study.
Material examined: MYANMAR: Nam Tamai Valley,
3000 ft, 27°42N, 97°54E, 26.vii.1938, R. Kaulback
[1, BMNH].
CITROGRAMMA SP.1
Geographical distribution: New Ireland Island (Papua
New Guinea).
Diagnosis: Very distinct female, with strongly infus-
cated wings, lighter posteriorly (Fig. 55). It has the
abdomen more flat than other species, with broad
abdominal yellow fasciae, parallel to tergum margins,
and slightly broadened on lateral margins (Fig. 54).
Remarks: Very distinct species with anepisternum
and anepimeron yellow and wing strongly infuscated.
This is the only specimen whose characters do not
apply to either of the two alternatives (major groups)
in couplet 22 (one group with yellow abdominal
fasciae reaching lateral margins and wings pale or
hyaline, and another with yellow abdominal fasciae
not reaching lateral margins and wings being infus-
cated), and the reason why the key has couplet 23.
Material examined: PAPUA NEW GUINEA: New Ireland
Province, Schleinitz Mts., Lelet Plateau, x.1959, W.W.
Brandt [1, BPBM].
CITROGRAMMA SP.2
Geographical distribution: Papua New Guinea.
Diagnosis: Female very similar to C. pintada, but it
has supra-alar area densely yellow pilose ventrally,
notopleuron yellow pilose but black pilose posteroven-
trally (Fig. 64) and abdominal terga 3 and 4 with
anterior black fascia narrower than yellow fascia,
which is as broad as half tergum length (Fig. 65).
Citrogramma sp. 2 also differs by facial hairs being
entirely yellow, and by having a medial broad black
vitta on frons reaching ocellar triangle and dividing
the yellow area as two isolated lateral vittae (Fig. 64).
Remarks: Female specimen collected in Papua New
Guinea, with abdominal yellow fasciae on third to
fifth terga not reaching lateral margins (Fig. 65).
Compared with C. pintada, her facial pilosity, frons,
and scutum pilosity is different and the abdominal
yellow fasciae slightly broader, especially the one on
tergum 2. Citrogramma sp. 2 has also the pleural
pilosity different: entirely yellow except anterior
anepimeron black pilose; but this character may be
variable.
Material examined: PAPUA NEW GUINEA: Morobe,
Wau, Nakata Ridge, 4700 ft, 11.vi.1968, J.W. Boyes
[1, CNC].
These three taxa are included in the identification
key, although more material is needed to identify
them properly. Additionally, Huo studied some mate-
rial from Tibet that did not match my descriptions (K.
Huo pers. comm.). Huo studied Citrogramma speci-
mens collected in Tibet [CHINA: Tibet, Nyingchi,
26.ix.2008, Chao–Hui Pan (21, SBSC)], which
may key out as C. amarilla, but the female specimen
has abdominal tergum 2 with two narrow, elongate
yellow maculae. Whether or not these specimens
belong to C. amarilla will be discussed in a future
paper (K. Huo, unpubl. data).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank Nigel Wyatt, The Natural History Museum
[formerly the British Museum (Natural History)],
London (BMNH); Rob de Vries and Gerard Pennards,
Nationaal Natuurhistorische Museum, Leiden
(RMNH); Chris Manchester and David Yeates, Aus-
tralian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra
(ANIC); Christophe Daugeron and Emmanuel Del-
fosse, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris
(MNHN); Ben Brugge, Zoölogisch Museum, Univer-
siteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam (ZMAN); Neal
Evenhuis, Bishop Museum, Honolulu (BPBM); Shin-
ichi Yoshimatsu and Hiraku Yoshitake, Natural
Resources Inventory Center (National Institute for
Agro-environmental Sciences), Ibaraki, Tsukuba
(NIAS); as well as Jeffrey Skevington, Canadian
National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nema-
todes, Ottawa (CNC), for permission to study mate-
rial in their care. Other collection acronyms used are:
AMNH for American Museum of Natural History,
New York; CAS for California Academy of Sciences,
San Francisco; CNMS for Sri Lanka National
Museum, Colombo; IARI for the Indian Agricultural
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 169
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Research Institute, New Delhi; INHS for Illinois
Natural History Survey, Champaign; IRSNB for Insti-
tut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brus-
sels; MCZ for Museum of Comparative Zoology,
Harvard University, Cambridge; NZSI for National
Zoological Collection, Zoological Survey of India, Cal-
cutta; QM for Queensland Museum, Brisbane; SBSC
for School of Bioscience and Engineering, Shaanxi
University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi; USNM
for National Museum of Natural History, Washington
D.C.; and ZMUC for Zoological Museum, University of
Copenhagen, Copenhagen. Neal Evenhuis, Brian
Brown, Adrian Plant, and Scott Miller are thanked
for information about localities, collectors, and labels,
and Jean-Pierre Michaud for allowing me to study his
material. I am very grateful to Kumar Ghorpadé
for helpful comments and discussion on this genus
and for his contribution of two new species of Citro-
gramma. My special thanks to Gerard Pennards for
his invaluable help sorting unidentified material at
RMNH, Leiden. I am particularly indebted to Ke-Ke
Huo (School of Bioscience and Engineering, Shaanxi
University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China),
who improved the identification key with his com-
ments and shared with me his discoveries about
Chinese syrphidofauna. I am also grateful to Jeffrey
Skevington (CNC, Ottawa) for permission to repro-
duce illustrations from Vockeroth (1969) [Figures 130,
140, 151, 153, 154, 157]. I thank the Smithsonian
Institution for my postdoctoral fellowship at the
National Museum of Natural History, funded by the
Schlinger Foundation. I am much obliged to F. Chris-
tian Thompson for his continuous support and impor-
tant guidance and also for his critical comments on
working drafts of this manuscript.
REFERENCES
Agarwala BK, Dutta S, Raychaudhuri DN. 1983. An
account of Syrphid (Diptera: Syrphidae) predators of aphids
available in Darjeeling District of West Bengal and Sikkim.
Pranikee – Journal of Zoological Society of Orissa 4: 238–
244.
Agarwala BK, Láska P, Raychaudhuri DN. 1984.
Prey records of aphidophagous syrphid flies from India
(Diptera, Syrphidae). Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 81:
15–21.
Anand RK. 1986. Records of Syrphids predating on Aphids in
Delhi. Proceedings of the 2nd National Symposium on Recent
trends in Aphidological studies, 197–200.
Anand RK, Rai S, Sharma VK. 1967. Notes on hoverflies
(Diptera: Syrphidae) from Delhi and adjoining areas. Indian
Journal of Entomology 29: 307–308.
Arnaud PH, Owen TC. 1981. Charles Howard Curran
(1894–1972). Myia 2: vi +393 pp.
Aslamkhan M, Safdar S, Azizullah N. 1997. Biodiversity of
syrphidae of Pakistan. Biologia 43: 19–25.
Biswas S, Lahiri AR, Ghosh AK. 1975. A preliminary study
of the insect fauna of Meghalaya. 2. Diptera, Syrphidae:
eleven new records and notes on other species. Proceedings
of the Zoological Society Calcutta [1974] 27: 23–27.
Brown RW. 1956. Composition of scientific words. A manual
of methods and a lexicon of materials for the practice of
logotechnics. Baltimore: Brown RW.
Brunetti E. 1923. Diptera. Pipunculidae, Syrphidae, Conopi-
dae, Oestridae. In: Shipley AE, ed. Fauna of British India
including Ceylon and Burma, vol III. London: Taylor
Francis, xii +424 pp +vi plates.
Cumming JF, Wood DM. 2009. Adult morphology and ter-
minology. In: Brown BV, Borkent A, Cumming JM, Wood
DM, Woodley NE, Zumbado MA, eds. Manual of Central
American Diptera, vol. 1. Ottawa: NRC Research Press,
9–50.
Curran CH. 1928. The Syrphidae of the Malay Peninsula.
Journal of the Federal Malay States Museums 14: 141–324.
Curran CH. 1931a. Additional records and descriptions of
Syrphidae from the Malay Peninsula. Journal of the Federal
Malay States Museums 16: 290–338.
Curran CH. 1931b. Records and descriptions of Syrphidae
from North Borneo including Mt Kinabalu. Journal of the
Federal Malay States Museums 16: 333–376.
Curran CH. 1942. Syrphidae from Sarawak and the Malay
Peninsula (Diptera). American Museum Novitates 1216:
1–8.
Das SK, Raychaudhuri D. 1983. Parasitoids and predators
of Aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) from India – VI. New
records of seven Arachnids, one Dipteran and one Neu-
ropteran Predators from Himachal Pradesh, India. Entomon
8: 27–34.
Datta M, Chakraborti M. 1985. Fauna of Namdapha
Arunachal, Pradesh. Insecta: Diptera. Records of the Zoo-
logical Survey of India Special Issue 82: 231–252.
Delfinado MD, Hardy DE. 1973. A catalog of the Diptera of
the Oriental Region, volume 1, suborder Nematocera. Hono-
lulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Deoras PJ. 1943. Description of and biological notes on a new
species of Syrphidae from India. Indian Journal of Ento-
mology [1942]4: 217–219.
Evenhuis NL. 2009. The insect and spider collections of the
world website. Available at http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/
codens/ [accessed 30 August 2010].
Frey R. 1946. Übersicht der Gattungen der Syrphiden–
Unterfamilie Syrphinae (Syrphine +Bacchinae). Notulae
Entomologicae [1945]25: 152–172.
Ghorpadé K. 1994. Diagnostic keys to new and known
genera and species of Indian subcontinent Syrphini
(Diptera: Syrphidae). Colemania: Insect Biosystematics 3:
1–15.
Gokulpure RS. 1972. Further collection of the Syrphidae
(Diptera) from central India. Journal of the Bombay
Natural History Society 68: 848.
Habib R. 1973. Natural enemies and their role in limita-
tion and control of Brevicoryne brassicae L. in Pakistan.
170 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
Technical Bulletin Commonwealth Institute of Biological
Control 16: 69–78.
Helgen KM, Leary T, Doria G, Amori G. 2008. Catalogue
of melanesian rodents in the museum of genova (Mammalia,
Rodentia). Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale G
Doria 99: 653–686.
Hervé-Bazin J. 1923a. Diagnoses de Syrphides [Dipt] nou-
veaux du Laos (Indo-Chine francaise). Bulletin de la Société
entomologique de France 1923: 25–28.
Hervé-Bazin J. 1923b. Notes sur les Syrphides de l’Inde
[Dipteres]. Remarques et Notes synonymiques sur l’ouvrage
de M. E. Brunetti: ‘The Fauna of British India. Diptera, Vol
III, Syrphidae, etc.’. Bulletin de la Société entomologique de
France 1923: 289–299.
Hervé-Bazin J. 1926. Syrphides de l’Indo.Chine Francaise.
Encyclopédie Entomologique (B) II 3: 61–110.
Hull FM. 1949. The morphology and inter-relationship of the
genera of syrphid flies, recent and fossil. Transactions of the
Zoological Society of London 26: 257–408.
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature.
1999. International code of zoological nomenclature, 4th
edn. London: The International Trust for Zoological Nomen-
clature.
de Jong H. 2000. The types of Diptera described by J.C.H. de
Meijere. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
Kapoor VC, Malla YK, Rajbhandari Y. 1979. Syrphid
flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) from Kathmandu valley, Nepal
with a check list of Syrphidae of Nepal. Journal of Natural
History Museum, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu 3:
51–68.
Keiser F. 1958. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Syrphidenfauna
von Ceylon (Dipt.). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 65: 185–239.
Knutson LV, Thompson FC, Vockeroth JR. 1975. Family
Syrphidae. In: Delfinado MD, Hardy DE, eds. A catalog of
the Diptera of the Oriental Region, volume II, suborder
Brachycera through division Aschiza, suborder Cyclor-
rhapha. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 307–
374.
Laurie EMO, Hill JE. 1954. List of land mammals of New
Guinea, Celebes, and adjacent islands, 1758–1952. London:
British Museum (Natural History) Publications.
Matsumura S, Adachi J. 1916. Synopsis of the economic
Syrphidae of Japan. Pl. [sic] [=Pt] I. Entomological Maga-
zine Kyoto 2: 1–36. pl. 1.
McAlpine JF. 1981. Morphology and terminology – adults.
In: MacAlpine JF, Peterson BV, Shewell GE, Teskey HJ,
Vockeroth JR, Wood DM, eds. Manual of Neartic Diptera
vol. 1. Ottawa: Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Mono-
graph no 27,9–63.
de Meijere JCH. 1908. Studien uber sudostasiatische
Dipteren. III. Tijdschrift Voor Entomologie 51: 191–332. pls.
7–8.
de Meijere JCH. 1914. Studien uber sudostasiatische
Dipteren. IX. Tijdschrift Voor Entomologie 57: 137–168.
169–275, pls. 5–7.
Mengual X, Ghorpadé K. 2010. The flower fly genus
Eosphaerophoria Frey (Diptera, Syrphidae). ZooKeys 33:
39–80.
Mengual X, Ruiz C, Rojo S, Ståhls G, Thompson FC.
2009. A conspectus of the flower fly genus Allograpta
(Diptera: Syrphidae) with description of a new subgenus
and species. Zootaxa 2214: 1–28.
Mengual X, Ståhls G, Rojo S. 2008a. First phylogeny of
predatory flower flies (Diptera, Syrphidae, Syrphinae) using
mitochondrial COI and nuclear 28S rRNA genes: conflict
and congruence with the current tribal classification.
Cladistics 24: 543–562.
Mengual X, Ståhls G, Rojo S. 2008b. Molecular phylogeny
of Allograpta (Diptera, Syrphidae) reveals diversity of lin-
eales and non-monophyly of phytophagous taxa. Molecular
Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 715–727.
Michaud JP. 1999. Sources of mortality in colonies of brown
citrus aphid Toxoptera citricida.BioControl 44: 347–367.
Mik J. 1897. Einige Bemerkungen zur Dipteren–Familie der
Syrphiden. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung 16: 61–66. 113–
119.
Mitra B, Mukherjee M, Banerjee D. 2008. A check-list of
hover-flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of Eastern Himalayas.
Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper
284: 1–47.
Mittermeier RA, Robles Gil P, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J,
Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, da Fonseca
GAB. 2005. Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest
and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Mexico City:
Conservation International.
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca
GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation
priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.
Nayar JL. 1968. A contribution to our knowledge of high
altitude Syrphidae (Cyclorrhapha: Diptera) from N.W.
Himalaya. Part I – subfamily Syrphinae. Agra University
Journal of Research Science [1967] 16: 121–131.
Nayar JL, Nayar L. 1965. Some interesting syrphids of Agra.
Indian Journal of Entomology 27: 240–241.
Ohara K. 2004. Insecta: Diptera, Syrphidae. In: Yule CM, Sen
YH, eds. Freshwater invertebrates of the Malaysian region.
Kuala Lumpur: Academy of Sciences Malaysia, 826–831.
Rai BK. 1976. Pests of oilseed crops in India and their control.
New Delhi: ICAR.
Rao VP. 1969. India as a source of natural enemies of pests
of citrus. Proceedings of the 1st International Citrus Sympo-
sium 2: 785–792.
Rojo S, Gilbert F, Marcos-Garcia MA, Nieto JM, Mier
MP. 2003. A world review of predatory hoverflies (Diptera,
Syrphidae: Syrphinae) and their prey. Alicante: CIBIO Edi-
ciones.
Sack P. 1926. Syrphiden (Dipteren) von den Philippinen und
Malaya. The Philippine Journal of Science 29: 563–596.
Shiraki T. 1930. Die Syrphiden des Japanischen Kaiserre-
iches mit Berücksichtigung benachbarter Gebiete. Memoirs
of the Faculty of Science and Agriculture Taihoku Imperial
University 1.
Speight MCD. 1987. External morphology of adult Syrphidae
(Diptera). Tijdschrift Voor Entomologie 130: 141–175.
Sun CH. 1992. Diptera: Syrphidae. In: Chinese Academy of
Science, ed. Insects of the Hengduan Mountains region, the
REVISION OF THE GENUS CITROGRAMMA 171
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
comprehensive scientific expedition to the Qinghai-Xizang
plateau. Beijing: Science Press, 1098–1114.
Tate GHH. 1940. Notes on the types of certain early
described species of Monotremes marsupials Muridae and
bats from the Indo–Australian region. American Museum
Novitates 1061: 1–10.
Thomas OMR. 1897. Viaggio di Lamberto Loria nella Pap-
uasia Orientale. XIX. On the mammals collected in British
New Guinea by Dr. Lamberto Loria. Annali del Museo
Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 38: 606–622.
Thompson FC. 1972. A contribution to a generic revision of
the Neotropical Milesinae (Diptera: Syrphidae). Arquivos de
Zoologia (Sao Paulo) 23: 73–215.
Thompson FC. 1999a. A key to the genera of the flower flies
of the Neotropical Region including the descriptions of
genera and species and a glossary of taxonomic terms.
Contributions on Entomology International 3: 319–378.
Thompson FC. 1999b. Data Dictionary and Standards.
[Fruit fly expert identification system and systematic infor-
mation database]. Myia 9: 49–63.
Thompson FC. 2010. Syrphidae. Systema Dipterorum. Avail-
able at http://www.diptera.org [accessed on 27August 2010].
Thompson FC, Thompson BJ, Fairman JE. 2000. Only in
Costa Rica: new Neotropical flower flies (Diptera: Syr-
phidae). Studia Dipterologica 7: 33–43.
Thompson FC, Vockeroth JR. 1989. Family Syrphidae. In:
Evenhuis NL, ed. Catalog of the Diptera of the Australasian
and Oceanian Regions. Vol. 86, Hawaii: Bishop Museum
Special Publication, 437–458.
Vockeroth JR. 1969. A revision of the genera of the Syrphini
(Diptera: Syrphidae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society
of Canada, Vol. 62.
Wallace AR. 1876. The geographical distribution of animals.
Vo l 1 . London.
Wyatt NP. 1991. Notes on Citrogramma Vockeroth (Diptera:
Syrphidae) with descriptions of five new species. Oriental
Insects 25: 155–169.
Yang JK, Huang CH, Cheng XY. 1998. Syrphidae. In: Xue
WQ, Chao CM, eds. Flies of China, part I. Shenyang: Lia-
oning Science and Technology Press, 118–223.
172 X. MENGUAL
© 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 164, 99–172
... In order to be able to trace the original publications of such species it is essential to attribute the authors and its reference correctly. Several papers contain species where authors of species names are one or more subsets of that of the paper, and authorship for species may even include people that are not authors of the paper itself (e.g., Thompson & Torp 1986;Mengual 2012;Young et al. 2020), stressing the importance of correct attribution of authorship. ...
... In this the name will most likely be assigned to Mengual & Ghorpadé. In this paper (Mengual 2012) the family name of Ghorpadé is given but not his address. ...
... For most of the recent literature, the concerned authors can still be asked what their intentions were, and for some (Mengual and Young pers. comm.) it is certain that both the name and the description of some of the species published in their papers (Mengual 2012;Young et al. 2020) were given by the person not listed as author of the paper. ...
Article
Full-text available
In the present work, I discuss the authorship of nominal species and genus-group names in Meigen (1822) and argue that the names are nowadays not always stated as possibly intended by Meigen, due to the strict rules of the ICZN (1999). I suggest that the rules of the ICZN have been applied too strictly for pre-1900 publications and even for some more recent ones. Authors have used different ways to acknowledge the contribution of colleagues, sometimes giving the name of the colleague only after the specific epithet, sometimes stating they described the species, and in other cases stating they both provided the name and the description. Only in the latter two cases does the ICZN attribute authorship of the colleague(s) in question for that species name. Here I show that this interpretation is not widely known and suggest that the ICZN should recognize the authorship if the contributor’s name is given after the specific epithet without further explanation. Furthermore, I discuss how to recognize the author of nominal species and genus-group names and suggest adding unique author identifiers to each newly described species name.
... The Indomalayan fl ower fl ies are clearly understudied. Recent taxonomic revisionary works brought to attention this fact by the high number of new species discovered (Mengual & Ghorpadé 2010;Mengual 2012Mengual , 2016van Steenis & Hippa 2012;Thompson 2013Thompson , 2015Thompson , 2017aThompson , 2017bThompson , 2020 (Vockeroth & Thompson 1987;Thompson & Rotheray 1998;Thompson et al. 2010;Ssymank et al. 2021) and unpublished revisionary works by F.C. Thompson (Thompson 2006 for South America; Thompson et al. unpub. for Australia), except the Indomalayan Realm. ...
Article
Full-text available
Three new species of Myolepta Newman, 1838 are described from Thailand (M. iota sp. nov.), Laos (M. diaphora sp. nov.) and Indonesia (M. geras sp. nov. from Java), and new records of Myolepta petiolata Thompson, 1971 from Thailand are also provided. Diagnoses, illustrations and known distributional data are given. In addition, the generic affinities and subdivision of Myolepta are discussed based on these newly described taxa.
... To better understand the Taiwnese fauna, Brunetti (1923) and Shiraki (1968a, b) have also been used. The following literature was used for further identification of specific genera and species: Asiobaccha Violovitsh, 1976 (Mengual, 2016); Chalcosyrphus (Syrittoxylota) Hippa, 1978(Hippa, 1985; Citrogramma Vockeroth, 1969 (Mengual, 2012); Eristalina (Thompson, 2003); Microdontinae (Reemer and Ståhls, 2013); Milesia Latreille, 1804 (Hippa, 1990); Paragus Latreille, 1804 (Stuckenberg, 1954;Thompson and Ghorpade, 1988;Sorokina and Cheng, 2007); Platycheirus (van Steenis et al., 2019a); Pseudovolucella Shiraki, 1930 (Reemer andHippa, 2008); Sphegina (Hippa et al., 2015;van Steenis et al., 2018); Syritta Lepeletier & Serville, 1828 (Lyneborg and Barkemeyer, 2005); Syrphini (Ghorpade, 1994(Ghorpade, , 2009; Xylotini (Hippa, 1978). A key to the species of Allobaccha, Asarkina, Episyrphus and Meliscaeva collected during this expedition is provided. ...
Article
Full-text available
In May and June 2016, an international SYRPHIDAE expedition was held in Taiwan, visiting several major habitats in order to obtain further knowledge of the current state of the biodiversity of this country. The participants were from several different countries and most were specialized in SYRPHIDAE. The co-operation with the Department of Entomology of the National Taiwan University was established in early 2015 and collecting permits and Nagoya protocol requirements were arranged through this department. In total 20 localities were visited, each of which is discussed and habitat information is given. A preliminary list of collected material is presented. A key to the species of Allobaccha Curran, 1928, Asarkina Macquart, 1834, Episyrphus Matsumura & Adachi, 1917 and Meliscaeva Frey, 1946 collected during this expedition is provided. In total 136 species were collected of which 33 were new faunal records and possibly even undescribed species. In the discussion, the potential of the fauna and possible forthcoming papers dealing with more detailed systematics are mentioned. The identity of several specimens was checked by studying types in various museums, which led to a lectotype being designated for Zelima armipes Sack, 1922.
... Results from Mengual (2015) resolved Citrogramma, a genus found in the Palaearctic, Indomalayan and Australasian biotic regions (see Mengual, 2012), as the sister group of a New World lineage. This American evolutionary lineage, the Ocyptamus lineage, comprises the genera Eosalpingogaster Hull, 1949, Hermesomyia Vockeroth, 1969, Ocyptamus Macquart, 1834, Orphnabaccha Hull, 1949, and Toxomerus Macquart, 1855 in our study, but also other taxa not included in the present analysis (see Mengual et al., 2012Mengual et al., , 2018Miranda, 2017;Miranda et al., 2014Miranda et al., , 2016. ...
Article
Phylogenetic relationships of the Sphaerophoria lineage (Sphaerophoria Le Peletier & Audinet-Serville and related genera) were inferred based on molecular characters, with the specific aim to infer the phylogenetic placement of the Afrotropical Sphaerophoria species and Loveridgeana beattiei van Doesburg & van Doesburg. Three molecular markers were used, i.e., the mitochondrial protein-coding gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and the nuclear 28S and 18S ribosomal RNA genes. The Sphaerophoria lineage genera Exallandra Vockeroth and Loveridgeana were resolved within the genus Sphaerophoria, and the Indomalayan Eosphaerophoria Frey was placed sister to Citrogramma Vockeroth, both related to a large species radiation from the New World. Fazia Shannon and Allograpta Osten Sacken were recovered as non-monophyletic. Our results recovered two different Fazia clades with dissimilar natural history resulted from our analyses, and Allograpta species were resolved into two clades, one with Nearctic and Neotropical species and a second clade with species from Oceanian, Indomalayan and Afrotropical Regions. Exallandra is considered a subgenus of Sphaerophoria, S. (Exallandra) stat. rev., and Sphaerophoria cinctifacies (Speiser) n. comb. a member of this subgenus together with S. loewii Zetterstedt. A new Sphaerophoria subgenus is designated S. (Loveridgeana) stat. rev. to include S. beattiei n. comb. and the South African species, i.e., S. quadrituberculata Bezzi, S. retrocurva Hull, and S. aff. retrocurva. Based on their phylogenetic distinctiveness, functional traits, and ecological relevance we do recommend further ecological study and protection efforts for this Afrotropical group of pollinators.
... Of these, 201 species and 53 genera were listed from Peninsular Malaysia and Borneo. More recently, a few new species have been described or reported from Malaysia (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). The most comprehensive work on Malaysian Syrphidae is still the series of Curran (26)(27)(28)(29); unfortunately, they are incomplete in the species treated and obsolete in the classification used. ...
Article
A body of an unknown adult female was found within a shallow burial ground in Malaysia whereas the skull was exposed and visible on the ground. During autopsy examination, nine insect larvae were recovered from the interior of the human skull and subsequently preserved in 70% ethanol. The larvae were greyish in appearance, each with a posterior elongated breathing tube. A week after the autopsy, more larvae were collected at the burial site, and some of them were reared into adults. Adult specimens and larvae from the skull and from the burial site were sequenced to obtain DNA barcodes. Results showed all adult flies reared from the burial site, as well as the larvae collected from the skull were identified as Eristalinus arvorum (Fabricius, 1787) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Here, we report the colonization of E. arvorum larvae on a human corpse for the first time.
... Original descriptions and inspection of type material were used for syrphid identification, together with a few existing identification keys such as Differential diagnoses, synonymies, references and distributions are given for all species included in the study. New species are described following the terminology of Thompson (1999) and Mengual (2012). The abbreviations used for collections follow the standard of the Systema Dipterorum (Thompson 2013 In the description of type labels, the contents of each label are enclosed within double quotation (" "), italics denote handwriting and the individual lines of data are separated by a double forward slash ( // ). ...
Article
Full-text available
The flower flies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of French Polynesia are revised. A total of nine syrphid species were recorded from the five archipelagos of French Polynesia. Among them are two species new to science, Allograpta jacqi Mengual & Ramage sp. nov. and Melanostoma polynesiotes Mengual & Ramage sp. nov., and a new record for this country, Syritta aenigmatopatria Hardy, 1964. We provide DNA barcodes for all flower fly species of French Polynesia, making the syrphid fauna of this country the first one in the world to be entirely barcoded. New data on biology, flowers visited and some taxonomic notes are provided. An identification key for the species of Syrphidae in French Polynesia is given, as well as an identification key for the species of Melanostoma Schiner, 1860 in the Australasian and Oceanian Regions.
... Hover flies also acts as a biological monitor (De Silva, 1961) for environmental change. Syrphids are the second most important recognized pollinators and help in cross pollination (Mengual, 2012) of several plants, along with large potency in biological control of aphid pests to prevent economic hazards (Parui et al., 2002). Even then they are being properly harnessed either for pollination services or for bio control services, For all these reasons of scientific interests, environmental services, and economic welfare, hover flies are worthy of our attention. ...
Article
This study altogether includes 96 species of hover flies under 40 genera of 3 subfamilies.Our study further includes 4 species of hoverflies that are Chrysotoxum quadrifasciatum Brunetti, 1923; Eristalinus (Eristalinus) tabanoides (Jaennicke, 1867); Lycastrisalbipes Walker, 1857 and Eumerus aurifrons (Wiedemann, 1824) which are reported for the first time from the state of West Bengal. Their taxonomic keys and detailed diagnostic accounts, as well as the distributional scenario, have been discussed here with latest updatation of nomenclature pattern.
... Morphologically, the most similar genus to Xanthogramma is Citrogramma Vockeroth, 1969, but in Xanthogramma the subscutellar fringe is absent, the metasternum is bare, the antennal base is more promanent than the oral apex and the lateral yellow vitta of the scutum does not reach the scutellum (Mengual 2012 5-7.iv.20125-7.iv. , Taylor, 38.309°N, 26.141°E, 2525 Diagnosis. ...
Article
Examination of 122 specimens of Xanthogramma Schiner, 1861 (Diptera: Syrphidae) from varied localities in Europe (+Turkey) resulted in the description of two new species ( X. aeginae Ricarte, Nedeljković, and Vujić new species and X. pilosum Nedeljković, Ricarte, and Vujić new species ), as well as new data on six other species. Most of the examined material originated from the Balkan Peninsula and Greek islands. New species concepts were supported by morphological and molecular evidence. Relationships among the eight studied species were analysed and discussed based on the data of nuclear (ITS2) and mitochondrial (COI) genes sequences. An identification key to the European species of Xanthogramma is provided. Lectotypes are designated for Doros decoratum Zetterstedt, 1843, Lasiophthicus novus Rondani, 1857, Syrphus laetus Fabricius, 1794, Syrphus ornatus Meigen, 1822, and Xanthogramma nobilitatum Frey, 1946.
Article
Full-text available
Alternative uses of land use pattern have caused declination in pollinator globally. The current pollinator catastrophe anomaly affects food scarcity, magnifies problems with hidden hunger, erodes ecological resilience and threatens ecosystems. Despite visiting at least 72% of global food crops, dipteran pollinators always have received much less research attention than hymenopterans. Hoverflies (Insecta:Diptera: Syrphidae) being one of the largest pollinator group from the Dipteran lineage is worthy of more research priorities. The study on this group of flies represents a huge research gap, particularly from the plain land ecosystems of West Bengal. According to the report, the ISHI score (India State Hunger Index) is 20.97 which is atan alarming level. The current study includes a detailed systematics & diversity analysis of this pollinator from the dry deciduous landscape (Sonamukhi Forest) from the state. For the current study purpose, pollinators have been collected by net sweeping & by using different traps over 3 years. The detailed study includes 20 species under 16 genera over two subfamilies where Syrphinae (53%) are more prevalent than Eristalinae (47%). The most prevalent species is found to be Episyrphus (Episyrphus) balteatus (De Geer, 1776) whereas Sphaerophoria indiana Bigot, 1884 is rarely present in all the seasons. On the other hand, the results of the diversity analysis study show species diversity to be at its highest during the Pre-Monsoon season (H = 4.261) and its lowest during the Monsoon season (H=1.12). Further detailed studies at periodic interval are necessary for more accurate database development and for ecosystem monitoring.
Article
Alternative uses of land use pattern have caused declination in pollinator globally. The current pollinator catastrophe anomaly affects food scarcity, magnifies problems with hidden hunger, erodes ecological resilience and threatens ecosystems. Despite visiting at least 72% of global food crops, dipteran pollinators always have received much less research attention than hymenopterans. Hoverflies (Insecta:Diptera: Syrphidae) being one of the largest pollinator group from the Dipteran lineage is worthy of more research priorities. The study on this group of flies represents a huge research gap, particularly from the plain land ecosystems of West Bengal. According to the report, the ISHI score (India State Hunger Index) is 20.97 which is atan alarming level. The current study includes a detailed systematics & diversity analysis of this pollinator from the dry deciduous landscape (Sonamukhi Forest) from the state. For the current study purpose, pollinators have been collected by net sweeping & by using different traps over 3 years. The detailed study includes 20 species under 16 genera over two subfamilies where Syrphinae (53%) are more prevalent than Eristalinae (47%). The most prevalent species is found to be Episyrphus (Episyrphus) balteatus (De Geer, 1776) whereas Sphaerophoria indiana Bigot, 1884 is rarely present in all the seasons. On the other hand, the results of the diversity analysis study show species diversity to be at its highest during the Pre-Monsoon season (H = 4.261) and its lowest during the Monsoon season (H=1.12). Further detailed studies at periodic interval are necessary for more accurate database development and for ecosystem monitoring.
Article
A new subgenus [Allograpta (Costarica Mengual & Thompson), type Allograpta zumbadoi Thompson], and one new species [Allograpta (Costarica) nishida Mengual & Thompson; type-locality: Costa Rica, type-depository: Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad de Costa Rica] of flower flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are described from the Neotropical biotic region. A checklist of the world species of Allograpta including synonyms is provided, and a key to and diagnoses of the subgenera are also supplied. The phylogenetic relationships among Allograpta species, representing all hitherto detected morphological diversity of the genus, and related genera were studied under parsimony based on morphological characters.