Conference PaperPDF Available

Investigation of controlled building collapse - analysis and validation

Authors:
  • Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC)
Investigation of controlled building collapse analysis and validation
Gunther Blankenhorn, Steffen Mattern, Karl Schweizerhof
Institute for mechanics, University Karlsruhe (TH), Englerstr. 2, D-76131 Karlsruhe,
Germany, Gunther.Blankenhorn@ifm.uni-karlsruhe.de
Controlled destruction of buildings at the end of their life cycle has become more and more
important. These buildings are either no longer attractive in an architectural sense or did not
reach suffice standards. Especially industrial buildings which are no longer used because of
technological or business reasons are often demolished by controlled explosives. To avoid
damage of neighboring buildings or traffic facilities an accurate prediction of the effects of the
building collapse and the building debris is needed. Otherwise uncontrolled collapse may
cause a great physical and major collateral damage.
After several accidental events caused by apparently controlled demolition with explosives,
the research unit FOR 500 [1] funded by the German research Foundation (DFG Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft) has been formed. A main goal is the efficient and reliable
prediction of controlled collapse of reinforced concrete buildings. Investigations are done in
the fields of numerical methods, dealing with uncertainty data in numerical analysis, different
modeling approaches and optimization of blasting strategies for buildings. Four civil
engineering departments in Germany are included in this research unit.
The subproject in the focus of this contribution performed at Karlsruhe University has the
goal to investigate the collapse sequence of the building by the Finite Element Method. The
goal is to allow a detailed look at the phenomena which drive the problem and to validate
also more simple and efficient alternative analysis.
On this behalf the idealization of some structural parts as rigid is done, which speeds up the
calculation time, but has to be based on correct behavioral observations. Otherwise such
simple models may lead to wrong predictions mostly due to ignoring contacts and dynamic
effects.
As an example the blast demolition of an industrial building is investigated. The commercial
code LS-DYNA [2] is used for these investigations. Modeling and discretization aspects
concerning simplifications are discussed. Several studies with flexible and partially rigid parts
were performed. As no measurement data were available a validation is performed by a
video sequence, overlaying visualized numerical results and pictures from a video tape of the
real collapse. With reasonable assumptions fairly good predictions of collapse can be
achieved, which can then serve as a basis for simplified analyse e.g. with rigid body
programs [3].
[1] DFG Forschergruppe 500, http://www.sprengen.net, 2006.
[2] J.O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA, vs 971, Livermore Software Technology Cooperation, 2006.
[3] Research unit FOR500, Subproject 5: Object-oriented software system for multi-level
simulation and optimisation of explosive demolition processes of the global structures,
Institute for Computational Engineering, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany,
http://www.sprengen.net, 2007
... Such analyzes never try to model the final debris heap. Because of its strongly non-linear behavior and the high level of computational effort, successful modeling of the final and collapsed condition of large structures with FE is still an issue for current research and only a few examples have been found in literature, for instance (Michaloudis et al., 2011), (Blankenhorn et al., 2007), and (Luccioni et al., 2004). Unlike the continuum-based methods, discrete approaches such as the Discrete Element Method (DEM) (Cundall, 1971), the Rigid Bodies Spring Method (Kikuchi et al., 1992), the Finite Particle Method (Yu & Zhu, 2016), and further derivatives have some inherent advantages in considering the simulation of debris heaps. ...
Article
Full-text available
Progressive collapse is defined as either partial or overall failure of the structure due to losing one of the main structural elements. In order to control this chain reaction, it is important to study the main structural elements behavior under column removal. Precast concrete structures become widely used recently due to the quality control assurance, economical aspects, and time-saving construction. Due to this many researchers studied the precast concrete structures behavior under earthquake loading, observing the failure patterns, weak points, and how to overcome all those parameters, however, regarding progressive collapse , Precast concrete structures need intensive researches to cover all the parameters that will affect the structure's behavior due to accidental loading. One of the main parameters that still ambiguous is the Precast beam span lengths and its behavior on the overall structure When subjected to progressive collapse. In this paper, the influence of different span lengths of precast beams is studied under different column removal scenarios. A precast concrete structure case study is adopted and designed according to Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute and ACI 318-14 and a multiple 3D models, for different span lengths, are modeled in Extreme Loading of Structures software based on the Applied Element Method. Non-linear dynamic time-dependent analysis is conducted on two case studies; bare frame structure without any slab contribution (Case1), and full structure with slab contribution (Case2). Column removal scenarios are applied according to the UFC regulations, partial collapse took place in case1 while case 2 showed high resistance to progressive collapse. Observations are reported in terms of failure cause for case 1 and the resisting mechanism that took place in case 2. Rotational ductility redistributed applied loads for beams and columns are obtained for case 2. A comparison took place between the rotations obtained in the case study and the rotation limits specified by the UFC and found that the system is satisfying the UFC limits, and no additional consideration needs to be done in resisting progressive collapse.
... The numerical examples which are presented in this section cover a wide range starting from simple academic examples and expanding to fairly large numerical models with up to 150.000 elements. The models of the two exam- ples are among the 5 reference models of the research unit (FOR500) [6] [10] [11]. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
When buildings are not longer used, controlled deconstruction is necessary. Besides systematic dismounting with heavy machines, a very efficient way is to use controlled explosives. The main load-carrying structural parts of the building are weakened by an explosive charge, which leads to a specific collapse kinematics. This has to be predicted reliably, in order to consider the boundary conditions such as neighboring buildings and traffic loaded streets. When planning such a collapse event, it is desirable to have a reliable simulation of the complete collapse process, also considering the uncertainty of primary parameters influencing e.g. the resistance of structural elements of a building. The ‘Research Unit 500’ [1], funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft – DFG) develops a special simulation concept by subdividing the collapse analysis into several – problem specific – analyses.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.