ArticlePDF Available

Progoniada and Goniadella (Annelida: Polychaeta: Goniadidae) from the outer continental shelf and slope off south-eastern Brazil

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Species of the genera Progoniada and Goniadella are recorded from off the Brazilian coast, from depths of 93 to 808 m. The description of Progoniadaregularis is complemented with new data on the number of chevrons and micrognaths. Goniadellarevizee sp. nov. is described; it differs from the five known species of the genus mainly in having acicular chaetae above the dorsal cirrus, together with 20–21 uniramous chaetigers. The proboscideal papillae of both species are illustrated by scanning electron micrographs.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Progoniada and Goniadella (Annelida: Polychaeta:
Goniadidae) from the outer continental shelf and slope
south-eastern Brazil
Alexandra Elaine Rizzo* and Antonia Cec|
¤lia Zacagnini Amaral
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas^UNICAMP, CP 6109, 13083-970,
Campinas, SP^Brazil *Corresponding author, e-mail: aerizzo@hotmail.com
Species of the genera Progoniada and Goniadella are recorded from the Brazilian coast, from depths of
93 to 808 m. The description of Progoniada regularis is complemented with new data on the number of
chevrons and micrognaths. Goniadella revizee sp. nov. is described; it di¡ers from the ¢ve known species
of the genus mainly in having acicular chaetae above the dorsal cirrus, together with 20^21 uniramous
chaetigers. The proboscideal papillae of both species are illustrated by scanning electron micrographs.
INTRODUCTION
The family Goniadidae Kinberg, 1865 presently
comprises ten genera with about 73 species (Hilbig, 1994).
Records from the Brazilian coast include 16 species
belonging to the genera Glycinde,Goniada,Goniadides,
Progoniada and Ophioglycera (Hartman, 1965; Steiner,
2000). The complete list of Brazilian coastal species is
available on the site http://www.ib.unicamp.br/pesquisa/
projetos/biota/bentos___marinho/index.htm. The present
contribution adds new records of species of Progoniada and
Goniadella from the south-eastern coast of Brazil.
The goniadids are characterized by possession of an
annulated, conical prostomium and uniramous and sub-
biramous parapodia. The single exception is Progoniada,in
which all parapodia are uniramous. The end of the
proboscis includes paragnaths arranged in a dorsal and a
ventral arc; two macrognaths with several cusps in a
latero-ventral position and several micrognaths com-
posed of two basally jointed, Hþw-shaped pieces, and of
X- or Y-shaped single pieces, in the dorsal and/or
ventral positions. The proboscis is densely covered by
proboscideal papillae, which can be very diversi¢ed. The
genera Progoniada,Goniadella and Goniada have a paired
row of V-shaped structures, termed chevrons (Hartman,
1950).
Important taxononomic characters distinguishing
genera and species of Goniadidae include the number of
annulations of the prostomium, the shape and arrange-
ment of the proboscideal papillae, the presence or absence
of chevrons, the number and shape of the micrognaths in
the dorsal and ventral arc, the number of uniramous
chaetigers, the number and shape of the parapodial
lobes and the type of noto- and neuro-chaetae (Wilson,
2000).
Herein, we complement the description of Progoniada
regularis and describe a new species of Gonadiella. Both
species were collected in waters south-eastern Brazil
during the REVIZEE Programme Avaliac a
o do Potencial
Sustenta
¤vel dos Recursos Vivos na Zona Econo
mica
Exclusiva’.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens of Progoniada regularis and Goniadella revizee sp.
nov. were collected during the REVIZEE Programme/
South Score/Benthos sampling cruises of the RV ‘W.
Besnard’ in December 1997 to March 1999, on the outer
continental shelf and slope south-eastern Brazil. This
area extends from Ilha Grande Bay in southern Rio de
Janeiro State (24820.5270S43846.7590W) south to
Tr a m a n d a |¤in Rio Grande do Sul State (29828.750S
48809.350W). Water depths ranged from 60 to 808 m. The
samples were collected with vanVeen and box corer grabs
and with a dredge. The polychaetes were sorted from the
sediment, washed, ¢xed with 4% formalin, stored in 70%
alcohol, and identi¢ed.
For goniadids, the proboscis was dissected with
ophthalmic scissors, to examine the papillae, macro- and
micrognaths and chevrons. Measurements and line
drawings were made using ZEISS optical microscopy and
stereomicroscopy. Observations using scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) were made at the Laborato
¤rio
de Microscopia Eletro
nica, Instituto de Biologia,
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), with
JEOLJSM-5800 LV1equipment, after critical-point drying
with Balzers CPD 301equipment (temperature 308C, pres-
sure 80 kg cm2) and coating with 25 nm gold.The material
examined was deposited in the Museu de Histo
¤ria Natural of
UNICAMP, in the Polychaeta Collection (MHN-BPO).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
SYSTEMATICS
Fa m i l y GONIADIDAE Kinberg, 1865
Progoniada Hartman, 1965
Type species
Progoniada regularis Hartman, 1965.
Diagnosis
Proboscideal papillae of only a few types. Chevrons
present. First segment apodous and without chaetae, with
J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2004), 84,47^58
Printed in the United Kingdom
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
only lateral cirri. All parapodia uniramous, with only
composite chaetae, falcigerous and/or spinigerous.
Progoniada regularis Hartman, 1965
(Figures 1^3; Table 1)
Progoniada regularis Hartman, 1965: 100^101, plate 16;
Hartman & Fauchald, 1971: 76.
Material examined
A total of 89 specimens: Station 6646, 25843.780S
45816.0 60W, 198 m, 14 December 1997, MHN-BPO/AR-
51, 1 specimen. Station 6660, 24817. 67 8 0S43848.1980W,
314m, 9 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-30, 2 specimens.
Station 6669, 24807.3470S44842.1420W, 1 01 m , 1 1 Ja n u a r y
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-36, 6 specimens. Station 6671,
24832.910S44827.460W, 260 m, 11 January 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-31, 4 specimens. Station 6672, 26827.750S
44830.3510W, 165 m, 11 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-32,
1 specimen. Station 6676, 24849.6990S44844.9650W,
153 m, 12 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-38, 1 specimen.
Station 6677, 24840.7470S44850.8220W, 13 7 m , 1 2 J a nu a r y
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-39, 3 specimens. Station 6678,
24846.3570S45811.13 5 0W, 99 m, 12 January 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-33, 2 specimens. Station 6681, 25811. 0 0 5 0S
44856.60W, 168 m, 12 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-40, 1
specimen. Station 6686, 25836.9880S45813.571 0W, 1 5 3 m ,
13 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-34, 3 specimens. Station
6690, 27800.880S46840.210W, 280 m, 18 January 199 8,
MHN-BPO/AR-37, 1 specimen. Station 6706, 25848.600S
45844.500W, 184 m, 21 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-35,
1 specimen. Station 6737, 24813.35 0S43825.900W, 4 7 6 m ,
14 February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-317, 1 specimen.
Station 6738, 24811.6 0 0S43826.200W, 330 m, 14 February
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-321, 2 specimens. Station 6739,
24802.580S43830.800W, 147 m, 14 February 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-311, 2 specimens. Station 6741, 23849.900S
43814.400W, 138 m, 15 February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-
286, 5 specimens. Station 6744, 23851.5 0 0S42849.900W,
254 m,15 February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-316,7 specimens.
Station 6749, 23844.200S42829.800W, 325 m, 16 February
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-282, 2 specimens. Station 6753,
23836.540S42809.860W, 187 m, 16 February 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-322, 7 specimens. Station 6762, 23826.200S
41815.820W, 146 m, 28 February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-
309, 6 specimens. Station 6769, 22802.870S40805.930W,
93 m, 13 March 199 8, MHN-BPO/AR-328, 3 specimens.
Station 6783, 27809.900S46852.830W, 350 m, 14 March
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-329, 10 specimens. Station 6784,
27809.510S47804.850W, 195 m, 14 March 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-340, 4 specimens. Station 6791, 27848.780S
47810.630W, 358 m, 16 March 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-333,
2 specimens. Station 6793, 27846.490S47840.450W, 14 0 m ,
16 March 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-335, 2 specimens.
Station 6797, 28808.150S47822.610W, 190 m, 17 March
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-337, 1 specimen. Station 6801,
28834.160S47840.380W, 166 m, 17 March 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-332, 2 specimens. Station 6821, 29849.490S
48812.760W, 232 m, 24 March 1999, MHN-BPO/AR-330,
7 specimens.
Description
Thirteen complete specimens, with lengths from 3.42 to
13.62 mm and widths from 0.16 to 0.32 mm, and 76 incom-
plete specimens. Number of chaetigers from 27 to 83 in
complete specimens. Whitish body; pigment, when
present, brownish, irregular, subdistally on the prechaetal
lobes (Figure 3G); punctiform intersegmental pigment
present from the middle ventral region (Figure 3D). Speci-
mens with slender cylindrical body, of uniform width.
Conical prostomium as long as the ¢rst six chaetigers,
with eight distinctly visible rings (Figures 1A & 3A).
Prostomial appendages biarticulate, with robust basal
articulation and a median constriction; distal articulation
short, about one-fourth as long as basal articulation
(Figure 1B). Eyes not visible. Nuchal organs inconspicuous,
ciliated, located in latero-dorsal position in the basal
prostomial ring. Four small ciliated cavities on each
prostomial ring, two ventral and two dorsal, except on
distal and basal ring (Figure 1A). All proboscids invagi-
nated, with macro- and micrognaths located between
chaetigers 13 and 14. Proboscis with two macrognaths in
latero-ventral position; three micrognaths in ventral and
about 10^14 in dorsal arc, or fewer in juvenile specimens.
Macrognaths with three or four cusps. Micrognaths with a
single X-shaped piece, or two basally jointed H þw-
shaped pieces (Figure 3C), usually arranged in the
following manner: (a) in ventral position: three groups of
the large Hþw-shaped pieces; (b) in dorsal position: a
pair of small X-shaped pieces, located near the macro-
gnaths, externally; two large pairs, with H þw-shaped
pieces; a small X-shaped pair, rarely accompanied by a
smaller U-shaped piece; and three groups with Hþw-
shaped median pieces. Paired rows of chevrons of the inva-
ginated proboscis located at the level of chaetiger 6 or 7,
with about 14 to 22 slender V-shaped pieces (Figure 3B);
juvenile specimens with eight pairs. Proboscis surface
covered with low papillae, sub-triangular, with one
subapical ciliated pore (Figure 2A). Proboscideal papillae
more numerous on the dorsal region, composed of about
5^6 series of cordiform papillae with distal ends pointed,
on narrow base (Figure 2A, F^G). Latero-ventral region
with three larger series of smaller papillae with distal ends
pointed, on wide base (Figure 2B); the ¢rst with cordiform
papillae and the distal end laterally pointed (Figure 2C),
the second, tricuspid with the median cusp bi¢d (Figure
2D); the third with papillae rounded at base with distal
end slightly pointed (Figure 2E). A posterior row,
ventral, with lateral papillae, slightly spread on narrow
bases and with distal ends rounded (Figure 2H^I).
Papillae near chevrons smaller than other papillae, with
distal ends rounded. First segment apodous, without
chaetae, and with lateral cirri only (Figures 1A & 3A).
Parapodia with prechaetal lobe digitiform and postchaetal
lobe rounded; postchaetal lobe about one-half to one-third
length of prechaetal lobe (Figures 1C & 3E,G). Dorsal and
ventral cirri digitiform to subtriangular, about as long as
postchaetal lobe, or slightly shorter. Parapodia progres-
sively slightly longer and more slender from anterior to
posterior region. Chaetigers usually with six chaetae: two
falcigers with short distal appendages, located in the outer
region of the bundle (Figures 1D & 3H), two falcigers with
distal appendages long, in the intermediate region
(Figure 3I), and two long spinigers, in the inner part of
the bundle (Figures 1E & 3J). Last chaetigers rudimen-
tary, with fewer chaetae. Pygidial cirri not visible, probably
lost (Figure 3F).
48 A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral 49
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Figure 1. Progoniada regularis (SEM micrographs). (A) Anterior region, left latero-frontal view of the prostomium, showing the
ciliated cavity (cc); (B) prostomial appendages, frontal view; (C) parapodia of the median region, lateral view; (D) falcigerous
chaetae; (E) spinigerous and falcigerous chaetae. (D&E, chaetae from middle region.)
50 A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Figure 2. Progoniada regularis (SEM micrographs). (A) Proboscideal papillae; (B) latero-ventral papillae, arranged in enlarged
series of shorter papillae with distal ends pointed, on a wide base; (C) papilla with distal ends laterally pointed; (D) tricuspid
papilla with bi¢d median cusp; (E) papilla rounded at base and with distal end slightly pointed; (F) cordiform papillae; (G) detail
of the cordiform papilla; (H) £attened papillae with distal ends rounded, on a narrow base; (I) detail of the £attened papilla.
Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral 51
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Figure 3. Progoniada regularis. (A) Anterior region, dorsal view; proboscis invaginated, chevrons (ch) seen by transparency; (B)
paired rows of chevrons with 17 pieces each; (C) pieces of micrognaths, Hþw-shaped and basally jointed (left) and X-shaped
pieces accompanied by U-shaped piece (right); (D) median region, ventral view; (E) chaetiger 35, posterior view (dc, dorsal cirrus;
post, postchaetal lobe; pre, prechaetal lobe; vc, ventral cirrus); (F) last chaetigers; (G) chaetiger 50, posterior view; (H) falcigerous
chaetae with short distal appendages; (I) falcigerous chaeta with long distal appendage; (J) spinigerous chaetae.
Remarks
Gambi & Giangrande (1988) identi¢ed as Progoniada sp.
a single specimen collected from shallow depths in the
Adriatic Sea, which was found together with Goniada
maculata rsted, 1843 and Glycinde nordmanni (Malmgren,
1865). This specimen had ¢ve pairs of chevrons, and most
of the composite chaetae without the distal appendages;
some complete spinigers were present. We believe that the
specimen examined by Gambi & Giangrande (1988) is a
juvenile of Goniada sp., because although it had only unira-
mous chaetigers, the sub-biramous chaetigers might not
yet have developed. Species of the genus Progoniada have
only lateral cirri in the ¢rst chaetiger, but the specimen
from Mediterranean Sea had the ¢rst chaetiger complete,
without chaetae. In the area where P. regularis was collected
together with specimens of Goniada brunnea Treadwell, 1906
and G. maculata, we found two small specimens, one
complete and the other incomplete with nine prostomial
rings, one pair of eyes in the basal ring, most of the
chaetae spinigerous and some falcigerous, and 5^6 pairs of
chevrons. We identi¢ed them as juveniles of G. brunnea,
because all the chaetigers were uniramous, and the total
number of chaetigers in the complete specimen was less
than 40 uniramous chaetigers, as found in this species.
According to Gilbert (1984), species belonging to Goniada
have neuropodia with spinigerous chaetae, but inferior
falcigers may be present on some anterior chaetigers.
Besides the type species, the genus Progoniada includes
only P. simplex Hartman, 1971, described from the
Mozambique Basin. Both species were found in deep
waters, between 770 and 5001m. At Bermuda, Hartman
(1965) found some individuals with a short squat body
and long natatory chaetae, together with specimens of
P. regularis. She remarked that the former might be a
distinct species, rather than an epitoke.
The specimens examined for the present report had one
pair of chevron rows, each with about 14 to 22 pieces
(mean 18), except for one juvenile with only eight. The
number of chevrons on each side of the proboscis did not
vary. Juveniles also had fewer micrognaths, some still in
the process of development. Like the chevron number, the
ventral macro- and micrognaths showed little variation.
One specimen had one w-shaped piece with four instead
of three cusps. Micrognaths in the dorsal position
numbered from ten to 14, with the exception of one juve-
nile that had only six plus some pieces in the process of
development.
In the original description, Hartman (1965) mentioned
a ¢xed number (20) of pairs of chevrons and only ¢ve
H-shaped micrognaths in the dorsal arc, besides the three
usually found in the ventral arc.
Progoniada regularis di¡ers from P. simplex in that the
latter has only spinigerous chaetae (Table 1). Examination
of the holotype of P. simplex will be necessary to determine
whether this species distinction is valid.
Bathymetric distribution
Progoniada regularis has been reported from depths of 196
to 5023 m. In this study, the species was collected from 93
to 476 m.
Geographic distribution
Western Atlantic Ocean: Massachusetts, USA;
Bermuda; Surinam; north of the mouth of the
Amazon River, Pernambuco, and from Rio de Janeiro
to Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Goniadella Hartman, 1950
Type species
Eone gracilis Verril, 1873.
Diagnosis
Proboscideal papillae of one or several types. Chevrons
present. First segment apodous, without chaetae and with
one pair of lateral cirri. Anterior parapodia uniramous,
posterior sub-biramous. Prechaetal neuropodial lobe
entire, not bifurcated. Notopodial lobe absent or reduced.
Acicular notochaeta projecting directly from the epidermal
tissue, above or below the dorsal cirrus. Falcigerous and
spinigerous neurochaetae.
Goniadella revizee new species
(Figures 4^6, Table 2)
Type material
Twenty four specimens. Holotype: Station 6741,
23849.900S43814.4 00W, 138 m, 15 February 1998, MHN-
BPO/85-0; paratype series: Station 6741, 23849.900S
43814.400W, 138 m, 15 February 1998 MHN-BPO/85-1 to
MHN-BPO/85-23, 23 specimens.
Other material examined
A total of 95 specimens: Station 6666, 24817.1 2 9 0S
44812.179 0W, 163 m, 10 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-42,
52 A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of the species of Progoniada recorded in the literature.
Species Depth (m)
Lengthwidth
(mm)
Number of
chaetigers
Numbers of
chevrons
Proboscis:
micrognaths
(ventral; dorsal arc) Chaetae
P. regularis Hartman, 1965 770^5001 14^150.25 475 i 20^20 3; 5 Falcigers and
spinigers
P. simplex Hartman, 1971* 4886^5069 22.51.3 98 i 15^15 3; 10* Spinigers
Material examined 99^476 3.42^13.62
0.16^0.32
27^83 c 14^22 3; 10^13 Falcigers and
spinigers
*, Hartman (1971) may have erred in describing ten ventral micrognaths and three in the dorsal arc, because goniadids have 0, 3 or
more micrognaths in the ventral arc and a variable number in the dorsal arc.We assume that P. simplex has three ventral and ten dorsal
micrognaths in all its populations. c, complete; i, incomplete.
Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral 53
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Figure 4. Goniadella revizee sp. nov. (SEM micrographs). (A) Anterior region, dorsal view; (B) basal prostomial ring showing
nuchal organ (no) and ciliated cavity (cc), left lateral view; (C) rows of chevrons with 12 pieces (other four pieces were lost during
SEM processing); (D) acicular notochaetae; (E) transition between uniramous and sub-biramous parapodia (par); beginning of
acicular chaetae (ac) in the notopodium, dorsal view; (F) falcigerous chaetae, with long distal appendage (left) and with short
distal appendage (right).
54 A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Figure 5. Goniadella revizee sp. nov. (SEM micrographs). (A) Proboscideal papillae of two types with a ciliated subapical pore;
(B) papilla with a single cusp; (C) papilla with bicuspid distal end; (D) micrognaths of the ventral arc, view of the outer part;
(E) papillae located near the base of the proboscis; (F) arc of macro- (ma) and micrognaths (mi) in dorsal (d) and ventral (v)
position; (G) micrognath; (H) macrognath; (I) paired rows of chevrons with 19^20 pieces.
Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral 55
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Figure 6. Goniadella revizee sp. nov. (A) Prostomial appendages; (B) anterior region, dorsal view; (C) posterior region with inter-
segmental punctiform pigment seen by transparency in dorsal view; (D) chaetiger 6 (dc, dorsal cirrus; post, postchaetal lobe; pre,
prechaetal lobe; vc, ventral cirrus); (E) chaetiger 20; (F) chaetiger 31 (ac: acicular chaetae); (G) chaetiger 40 (D^G, all chaetigers
in posterior view); (H) spinigerous chaeta with long distal appendage (left) and falcigerous chaeta (right).
56 A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
Table 2. Morphological characteristics of species of Goniadella.
Species LengthNumber of
Number of
uniramous Number
Proboscis: macro-
gnaths (number of
cuspids)þmicrognaths Chaetae
References Geographic distribution Depth (m) width (mm) chaetigers Eyes parapodia of chevrons (ventral; dorsal) A F S
Goniadella gracilis (Verrill, 1873) sensu Hartman, 1950
Hartman, 1950 Massachusetts, Gay Head
(type locality)
Intertidal to 6 20 NM 1 pair basal þ
1 pair distal
30^31 26 4þ3; 10
(þ2^3 small)
3^43
^4NM
Pettibone, 1963 Massachusetts; Rhode Island 525 5501.0 4100 1 pair basal þ
1 pair subdistal
27^32 26 3^4þ3; 10 2^4NMNM
Walker, 1972 Liverpool Bay, England 15^37 12^23 NM NM 28^29 20^34 NM 1^22
^42
^3
Goniadella galaica (Rioja, 1923)
Rioja, 1923* Tambo Island, Mar|
¤n, Spain
(type locality)
NM 15^251NM 1pair 22
^23 17^24 3 þ3; 9^10 3 NM NM
Goniadella bobrezkii (Annenkova, 1929)
Annenkova, 1929 Black Sea (type locality) 12.5^17 13^140.5 90 1 pair basal þ
1 pair subdistal
24 17^18 5 þ15 2^3NMNM
Walker, 1972 North Sea and Black Sea NM NM NM 1 pair basalþ
1 pair distal
22^24 17^24 NM 2 2^31
^2
Wol¡ & Stegenga,
1975**
Scheldt River,
The Netherlands
84.00.2
(juvenile)
34 1 pair basalþ
1 pair subdistal
22 4^4* NM þ425
Goniadella falklandica Hartmann-Schro«der, 1986
Hartmann-Schro
«der,
1986*
Falkland Islands (type locality) 535 37 95 Not observed 45^47 15^16 NM þ4; 16* 3 4^64
^7
Goniadella unicirra Campoy & Aguirrezabalaga, 1984
Aguirrezabalaga,
1984
Guipu¤ zcoa Coast, Iberian
Peninsula (type locality)
30^70 NM 44 1 pair basal þ
1 pair subdistal
29 8^93
^4þ4;3 233
Goniadella sp. A Gilbert, 1984
Gilbert, 1984 Gulf of Mexico 19^56 24.50.8 5113 1 pair basal
(In Figure 33^
2f)
14^15 17^23 2 þ3^4; 11 NM NM NM
Goniadella revizee sp. nov.
Material examined Brazil (Rio de Janeiro to
Rio Grande do Sul)
99^808 8.08^20.3
0.14^0.3
54^129 Not observed 20^21 16^22 3 þ3; 8^10 1^32 3
*, Rioja (1923) described three micrognaths in dorsal and 9^10 in ventral position, and Hartmann-Schro
«der (198 6) described four micrognaths in dorsal and 16 in ventral position. They may have
erred, because goniadids have 0, 3 or more micrognaths in the ventral arc and avariable number (usually greater) in the dorsal arc. **, Wol¡ & Stegenga (1975) described eightV-shaped chevrons;
they illustrated the anterior region with two rows of chevrons, with four pieces on each. NM, not mentioned; A, acicular; F, falciger; S, spiniger.
2 specimens. Station 6671, 24832.910S44827.460W, 260 m,
11 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-50, 1 specimen. Station
6673, 24817.9390S44835.9830W, 133 m, 10 January 1998,
MHN-BPO/AR-43, 3 specimens. Station 6674, 24831.0 80S
44854.000W, 122 m, 10 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-4 4,
3 specimens. Station 6676, 24849.6990S44844.9650W,
153 m, 12 January 1998, MHN-BPO-AR45, 1 specimen.
Station 6678, 24846.3570S45811.1 35 0W, 9 9 m, 12 January
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-46, 3 specimens. Station 6679,
25818.874 0S44852.5160W, 808 m, 12 January 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-47, 2 specimens. Station 6686, 25836.9880S
45813.571 0W, 153 m, 13 January 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-49,
1 specimen. Station 6739, 24802.580S43830.800W, 14 7 m ,
14 February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-310, 6 specimens.
Station 6744, 23851.50 0S42849.900W, 254 m, 15 February
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-315, 1 specimen. Station 6750,
23840.080S42831.800W, 162 m, 16 February 199 8, MHN-
BPO/AR-312, 1 specimen. Station 6753, 23836.540S
42809.860W, 187 m, 16 February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-
323, 4 specimens. Station 6754, 23826.700S42814.0W,
131m, 17 February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-320, 2 speci-
mens. Station 6759, 23820.00S41822.00W, 11 0 m , 2 8
February 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-319, 32 specimens.
Station 6762, 23826.200S41815.820W, 146 m, 28 February
1998, MHN-BPO/AR-308, 30 specimens. Station 6784,
27809.510S47804.850W, 195 m, 14 March 1998, MHN-
BPO/AR-341, 1 specimen. Station 6797, 28808.150S
47822.610W, 190 m, 17 March 1998, MHN-BPO/AR-336, 1
specimen. Station 6817, 29828.750S48809.350W, 21 0 m , 2 3
March 1999, MHN-BPO/AR-342, 1 specimen.
Description
Holotype complete, with 75 chaetigers, length 10.6 mm,
width 0.28 mm. Paratype series with two complete, 21
incomplete specimens; complete specimens with 66^67
chaetigers, length 8.08^8.83 mm and width 0.24^
0.26 mm. Other material includes 13 complete specimens
with 54 to 129 chaetigers, length 8.25^20.3 mm and
width 0.14^0.3 mm, and 79 incomplete. Pigment, when
present, irregular, brownish, subdistally on the pre-
chaetal lobes and cirri; punctiform intersegmental
pigment present from biramous ventral region. Usually
with brown colouring on entire body, on dorsal and
ventral side.
Body long, anteriorly cylindrical, posteriorly slender.
Conical prostomium with eight rings (Figures 4A & 6B).
Prostomial appendages triarticulate, reaching the second
distal prostomial ring; basal article one-third size of
distal article (Figure 6A). Nuchal organs ciliated, drop-
shaped, located latero-dorsally on basal prostomial ring
four small ciliated cavities on each prostomial ring, two
ventral and two dorsal, except on distal and basal ring
(Figure 4B). Eyes not visible. All proboscids invaginated;
proboscis with two ventral macrognaths, three ventral
micrognaths, and 8^13 dorsal micrognaths (Figure 5F).
Macrognaths with three cusps (Figure 5H). Micrognaths
composed of two basally jointed pieces, one H-shaped and
the other smaller and w-shaped (Figure 5D, G); micro-
gnaths of ventral arc up to twice as large as micrognaths
of dorsal arc. Each row of chevrons with 16 to 22 in
V-shaped pieces (Figures 4C & 5I). Proboscideal papillae
mainly of two types, subtriangular, most with a single cusp
and some bicuspid; both types basally cleft, with a ciliated
subapical pore (Figure 5A^C). Papillae located near the
chevrons, with distal end rounded, and more distal
papillae with pointed ends; all papillae also basally cleft
with a ciliated subapical pore. Basal papillae smaller and
more rounded than others (Figure 5E). Parapodia of
posterior region longer and more slender than those of
anterior region. First segment apodous and achaetigerous,
with one pair of small digitiform lateral cirri (Figures 4B
& 6B). Parapodia composed of one digitiform prechaetal
lobe and one shorter, rounded postchaetal lobe, up to half
the length of the prechaetal lobe; and also of one dorsal
and one ventral cirrus, both digitiform to subtriangular
(Figure 6D,F). Biramous parapodia beginning on chae-
tiger 20^21 (20 in holotype), with the appearance of the
notochaetae (Figure 4E). Notopodium rudimentary, not
prominent, with 1^3 (usually two) simple acicular
chaetae, arising above dorsal cirrus (Figure 6E,G); one of
the chaetae with its tip slightly curved (Figure 4D).
Posterior neuropodia similar to anterior. Neuropodial
bundle usually composed of one pair of outer falcigerous
chaetae, one pair of spinigers with short distal appen-
dages in an intermediate position, and one spiniger
with one long distal appendage in the inner position of
the bundle (Figures 4F & 6H). Noto- and neuro-
podium each supported by one acicula. Anal opening
rounded, distal. Pygidium with one pair of slender
conical anal cirri, reaching in length the last three chae-
tigers (easily lost in ¢xed material).
Etymology
This species is dedicated to the REVIZEE Programme,
which made possible the collection of the material.
Remarks
Goniadella revizee sp. nov., Goniadella sp. A Gilbert, 1984
and Goniadella bobrezkii (Annenkova, 1929) di¡er from
other species of the genus mainly in possessing acicular
notochaetae above the dorsal cirrus on sub-biramous
parapodia, and in regard to the number of uniramous
chaetigers and chevrons. One of the acicular notochaetae
of G. re v i zee sp. nov. has its end slightly curved, similar to
those described for Goniadella unicirra Campoy &
Aguirrezabalaga, 1984 (in Aguirrezabalaga, 1984) and
G. bobrezkii.Goniadella bobrezkii is known from European
waters (Annenkova, 1929; Walker, 1972; Wol¡ & Stegenga,
1975). Goniadella bobrezkii di¡ers from Goniadella revizee sp.
nov. mainly in the number of uniramous chaetigers (24)
and the number of chevrons (17^18), but also in possessing
two pairs of eyes, and macrognaths with ¢ve cusps, besides
15 micrognaths. In the original description of this species,
the presence of ventral micrognaths was not mentioned.
Table 2 lists some morphological characteristics of the
¢ve described species of the genus Goniadella, taken from
the main references, and of Goniadella revizee sp. nov.
Goniadella gracilis (Verrill, 1873) and Goniadella falklandica
Hartmann-Schro
«der, 1986, described from the western
Atlantic, and Goniadella galaica (Rioja, 1923) from
Galicia, Spain, di¡er from Goniadella revizee sp.nov.in
having acicular notochaetae immediately below or on the
dorsal cirrus (Hartman, 1950: plate 5, ¢gure 7). In
Goniadella revizee sp. nov. the dorsal cirrus is next to the
neuropodial lobe in both the uniramous and the biramous
Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral 57
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
chaetigers. Moreover, these species have more uniramous
chaetigers than does Goniadella revizee sp.nov.(Table2).
Specimens from the Gulf of Mexico were ¢rst identi¢ed
as Goniadella sp. and G. gracilis. These specimens were later
transferred to Goniadella sp. A by Gilbert (1984), because
they did not share certain taxonomic characters with
G. gracilis, a species known from northern temperate
waters. Goniadella sp. A di¡ers from Goniadella revizee sp.
nov. in having: (a) 14^15 uniramous chaetigers; (b)
macrognaths with two cuspids; (c) straight acicular noto-
chaeta; and (d) a pair of eyes on the basal prostomial ring
(from ¢gure 33^2f, Gilbert, 1984).
Morphological di¡erences were found between the
specimens from the Brazilian south-east coast and those
from the Caribbean region. The specimens from
Brazil have: (a) 20^21 uniramous chaetigers; (b) macro-
gnaths with three cusps; (c) acicular notochaetae with the
ends slightly curved; and (d) eyes not evident. Gilbert
(1984) described the proboscideal papillae of Goniadella
sp. A as being of a single type, sub-triangular with only a
cusp. The SEM observations for the Brazilian population
revealed the existence of two types, with one or two cusps.
Although the specimens from both localities share certain
taxonomic characters, such as the number and position of
the acicular notochaetae and the number of pairs of chev-
rons, we decided to consider them two distinct species.
Our reasoning was based mainly on the di¡erent number
of uniramous chaetigers, which is usually the ¢rst charac-
teristic used to separate species in other genera of gonia-
dids. Additional di¡erences between these two species are
the size (lengthwidth), the number of cusps in the
macrognaths, the presence or absence of eyes, and the
range of depths where both species were found. In our
opinion, the di¡erences between Goniadella gilbertae sp.
nov. and other species are su⁄cient to justify designating
a new species.
Bathymetric distribution
Goniadella revizee sp. nov. occurred from 99 to 808 m.
Geographic distribution
Western Atlantic Ocean: Brazil, from Rio deJaneiro
to Rio Grande do Sul.
Our thanks to the CNPq (Conselho Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Cient|
¤¢co e Tecnolo
¤gico, Process no. 141504/
98-6), and to the MMA (Ministe
¤rio do Meio Ambiente, dos
Recursos H|¤dricos e da Amazo
nia Legal) for ¢nancial support.
We appreciate the facilities and assistance of the Departamento
de Zoologia and the sta¡ of the Laborato
¤rio de Microscopia
Eletro
nica, Instituto de Biologia, UNICAMP. We thank the
anonymous referees whose comments greatly improved the
manuscript. Our thanks also to Maren Boveri, for translating
the work of Annenkova (1929) from German to Portuguese.
Janet W. Reid revised the English text.
REFERENCES
Aguirrezabalaga, F., 1984. Contribucio
¤n al estudio de los
Ane
¤lidos Poliquetos de la Costa de Guipu¤ zcoa. Munibe
(Ciencias Naturales),36,119
^130.
Annenkova, N., 1929. Nachtrag zur Polychaetenfauna des
Schwarzen Meeres. I. Goniada bobrezkii sp.n. Comptes Rendus de
l’Acade
¤mie des Sciences de l’URSS,495
^497.
Gambi, M.C. & Giangrande, A., 1988. Record of the genus
Progoniada (Polychaeta: Goniadidae) in the Mediterranean
Sea. Atti della SocietaToscana di Scienze Naturali Residente in Piza.
Serie B, Memorie,95,147
^15 4.
Gilbert, K.M., 1984. Family Goniadidae Kinberg, 1866b.
Chapter 33. In Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern
Gulf of Mexico, vol. 5 (ed. J.M. Uebelacker and P.G. Johnson),
pp.33-1^33-19. Alabama: Mobile.
Hartman, O., 1950. Goniadidae, Glyceridae and Nephtyidae.
Allan Hancock Expeditions,15,1
^181.
Hartman, O., 1965. Deep-water benthic Polychaetous Annelids
New England to Bermuda and other North Atlantic areas.
Allan Hancock Foundation Publications,28,1
^378.
Hartman, O., 1971. Abyssal polychaetous annelids from the
Mozambique Basin southeast Africa, with a compendium
of abyssal polychaetous annelids from world-wide areas.
Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada,28,1407
^1428.
Hartman, O. & Fauchald, K., 1971. Deep-water benthic
Polychaetous Annelids New England to Bermuda and
other North Atlantic areas. Part II. Allan Hancock Monographs
in Marine Biology,6,1
^327.
Hartmann-Schro
«der, G., 1986. Polychaeten der 56. Reise der
‘‘Meteor’’ zu den South Shetland-Inseln (Antarktis).
Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum und Institut,83,71
^100.
Hilbig, B., 1994. 7. Family Goniadidae Kinberg, 1866. In
Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria basin and
western Santa Barbara channel.Vol.4.The Annelida, part 1.
Oligochaeta and Polychaeta: Phyllodocida (Phyllodocidae to
Paralacydoniidae) (ed. J.A. Blake and B. Hilbig), pp.215^230.
Santa Barbara, California: Santa Barbara Museum of
Natural History.
Pettibone, M.H., 1963. Marine polychaete worms of the New
England region. I. Aphroditidae through Trochochaetidae.
Bulletin. United States National Museum,227,1
^356.
Rioja, E., 1923. Algunas especies de ane
¤lidos poliquetas de las
costas de Gal|¤cia. Bolet|
¤n de la Real Sociedad Espan
ola de Historia
Na t u ra l ,23, 333^345.
Steiner, T.M., 2000. Eunicida e Phyllodocida (Polychaeta: Aciculata)
de praias do litoral norte do Estado de Sa
oPaulo. MSc thesis,
Instituto de Biocie
ncias, Universidade de Sa
o Paulo.
Walker, A.J.M., 1972. Goniadella gracilis, a polychaete new to
British seas. Marine Biology,14,85
^87.
Wilson, R.S., 2000. Family Goniadidae. In Polychaetes and Allies:
The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia.Vol. 4A. Polychaeta,
Myzostomida, Pogonophora, Echiura, Sipuncula (ed. P.L. Beesley
et al.), pp.129^131. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.
Wol¡, W.J. & Stegenga, H., 1975. Hesionura augeneri, Goniadella
bobretzkii,andParapodrilus psammophilus (Annelida, Polychaeta)
new to the Netherlands. Zoologische Bijdragen,17,82
^87.
Submitted 12 December 2002. Accepted 10 October 2 003.
58 A.E. Rizzo and A.C.Z. Amaral Progoniada and Goniadella (Goniadidae) from Brazil
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (2004)
... Remarks: Specimens studied from the central Atlantic and Peru Basin agree morphologically with the descriptions published by Rizzo and Amaral (2004a) and Böggemann 2005. The number of chevrons found for specimen ZMH-P 26697 collected from the central Atlantic is lower than given with 14-22 by Rizzo and Amaral (2004a) but falls into the range from 4 to 30 as given by Böggemann 2005. ...
... Remarks: Specimens studied from the central Atlantic and Peru Basin agree morphologically with the descriptions published by Rizzo and Amaral (2004a) and Böggemann 2005. The number of chevrons found for specimen ZMH-P 26697 collected from the central Atlantic is lower than given with 14-22 by Rizzo and Amaral (2004a) but falls into the range from 4 to 30 as given by Böggemann 2005. Some specimens from central Atlantic (ZMH-P 26697) and from Peru Basin (SMF 30497) with a median, brownish pigment dot ventrally on segments (from ca. ...
... Some specimens from central Atlantic (ZMH-P 26697) and from Peru Basin (SMF 30497) with a median, brownish pigment dot ventrally on segments (from ca. chaetiger 13 onwards in ZMH-P 26697), as described and figured by Rizzo and Amaral (2004a: fig. 3D). ...
Article
Distributional ranges of selected deep-sea annelids are examined in an integrative approach using genetic markers (COI, 18S) and morphology. The source material comes from various deep-sea expeditions to the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans realized between 1998 and 2015. Selection criteria for the eventual target species are a reliably documented widespread distribution in the deep-sea, and the presence in sufficient numbers of specimens in our source material. Specimens from museum collections are also incorporated. Species studied are Sigambra magnuncus, Bathyglycinde profunda and B. sibogana, Progoniada regularis, P. cf. regularis, and Spiophanes cf. longisetus, plus three newly described species: Octomagelona borowskii sp. nov., Spiophanes australis sp. nov., and Spiophanes pacificus sp. nov. Illustrated descriptions are provided and the morphological distinction to congeners discussed. Genetic diversity is highest in most frequently found species, also reflected by the large numbers of genetically divergent haplotypes. The majority of haplotypes are singletons. Pan-oceanic distribution is observed for Progoniada regularis, Bathyglycinde profunda and Sigambra magnuncus, but even species restricted to a single ocean have distributions spanning hundreds or even thousands of kilometres. Our data suggest multiple and possibly ongoing dispersal and genetic exchange between oceans, most cogent for Sigambra magnuncus.
... A partir da década de 70, foram impulsionadas em todo o país pesquisas sobre a distribuição e ecologia de poliquetas, gerando uma série de relevantes trabalhos, principalmente nas regiões sudeste/sul, entre os quais podem ser citados: Zibrowius (1970) ;Orensanz & Gianuca (1974);Nonato (1973); Amaral (1975Amaral ( , 1980Nonato (1981); Lana (1981Lana ( , 1984; Bolívar (1986); Bolívar & Lana (1987); Bolívar (1990); Paiva (1993); Ruta (1999); Muniz & Pires (1999); Muniz & Pires (2000); Rizzo & Amaral (2000); Attolini & Tararam (2001); Rizzo (2002); Faraco & Lana (2003); Rizzo & Amaral (2004) ;Amaral & Rossi-Wongtschowski (2004); Pagliosa (2005); Paiva (2006). Até o presente momento cerca de 800 espécies de poliquetas foram registradas para costa brasileira, distribuídas em 56 famílias, entre as 87 consideradas válidas (Amaral & Jablonski, 2005). ...
... Os poliquetas constituem aproximadamente um terço do número total das espécies do macrobentos, sendo considerado um dos organismos mais abundantes e estando presente em quase todos os ecossistemas bentônicos (Amaral et al., 2004). Apesar disso, ainda são escassos estudos referente à composição taxonômica de poliquetas no estado de Santa Catarina, principalmente no que se refere à plataforma continental externa. ...
... Para a região central, Paiva (2006), registrou um total de 30 famílias de poliquetas, no qual Eunicidae destacou-se como a mais abundante, responsável por 55,38% da abundância total. Amaral et al. (2004), registraram um total de 51 famílias para região sudeste/sul do país, nas quais Syllidae, Onuphidae e Eunicidae, foram as famílias numericamente dominantes, compreendendo 45,24% do total coletado. Conforme estes resultados, parece haver a existência de um padrão na distribuição das abundâncias das famílias em ambiente de plataforma externa e talude, para região sudeste/sul do Brasil. ...
... In the Italian waters, only 2 genera and 4 species are currently reported (Castelli et al. 2008 (Gambi and Giangrande 1988). However, Rizzo and Amaral (2004) indicated that the examined specimen could be a juvenile of Goniada sp., because although it had only uniramous chaetigers, the sub-biramous chaetigers might not yet have developed. ...
Article
Full-text available
Goniadella bobrezkii (Annenkova, 1929) is a small goniadid worm identifiable by the number of anterior uniramous parapodia and by the position of the posterior spine-like notochetae arising dorsal to dorsal cirri. Although it was already reported in the Mediterranean Sea, it has never been found in the Italian waters. This study represents the first generic and specific record of G. bobrezkii along Italian coasts. A total of 25 specimens were collected in a Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile bed, depth of 7 m, off Civitavecchia (Rome).
... The taxonomic knowledge of polychaetes is usually focused on specific taxa or regions (lana et al. 2009, riZZo & amaral 2004, almeida et al. 2012, riZZo & salaZar-valleJo 2014, riZZo et al. 2015. In the marine environment, careful regional taxonomic studies are particularly important for at least two factors: (1) there is a widely distributed species paradigm that has been challenged by studies of phylogeography and population genetics; and (2) such studies most times include comparisons with broad global collections, including comparisons of Brazilian specimens with type-material. ...
Article
Full-text available
We present herein a first synthesis of the available literature, together with an evaluation of the status of polychaete research in Brazil, but without providing an exhaustive list of the Brazilian polychaete literature, although most of the taxonomic papers on the local fauna are included in the bibliographic section. Although we have not included most of the abstracts and unpublished contributions, a significant part of the current knowledge on polychaetes from Brazil is only available as grey literature of limited or regional diffusion. The emphasis of the bibliographic list is on the literature produced by Brazilian polychaetologists, but relevant works produced abroad on the Brazilian fauna are equally included.
... The taxonomic knowledge of polychaetes is usually focused on specific taxa or regions (lana et al. 2009, riZZo & amaral 2004, almeida et al. 2012, riZZo & salaZar-valleJo 2014, riZZo et al. 2015. In the marine environment, careful regional taxonomic studies are particularly important for at least two factors: (1) there is a widely distributed species paradigm that has been challenged by studies of phylogeography and population genetics; and (2) such studies most times include comparisons with broad global collections, including comparisons of Brazilian specimens with type-material. ...
Article
This review assesses the current knowledge of polychaetes from Brazil, focusing on its historical development, known diversity, available human resources and collections. Despite advances made over the last few decades, the diversity of polychaetes in Brazil remains poorly known, since most of the eight marine ecoregions in the country are not properly sampled. About 1,400 species of polychaetes are known from Brazilian waters, corresponding to 10 % of the valid species worldwide. Taxonomic training has increased, but the distribution of researchers along the extensive coast remains uneven, with stronger representation in the southeastern region. Current research shortcomings and suggestions to increase taxonomic training and knowledge of polychaetes in the country are presented and discussed.
Article
Full-text available
A list of all known polychaete species reported in the primary literature is presented for the Caribbean Sea. The most speciesrich polychaete faunas are those of Cuba in the North Caribbean ecoregion and Trinidad-Tobago and Colombia in the South Caribbean ecoregion while the ecoregion with the greatest number of species is the Greater Antilles. While part of the explanation for these higher diversity areas may be due to collection effort, these areas may also be higher in species number as a result of being ecotones between the Gulf of Mexico in the north and the northern South American region to the south. The most species-rich families are the Syllidae, Eunicidae, Nereididae, Polynoidae, Sabellidae, Serpulidae, Terebellidae, and Spionidae. A brief discussion of the history of polychaete research identified many of the more important workers in the characterization of the polychaete fauna of the region. An analysis of the species-record accumulation curve for polychaetes indicated that this fauna has not yet been fully characterized. One portion of the polychaete fauna identified as being especially poorly known is that from the deep-water areas of the Caribbean.
Article
Full-text available
A checklist of polychaete species recorded fromParaná State (Southern Brazil, 25o10’– 25o58’ S /47o59’– 48o35’ W), including estuarine areas fromParanaguá and Guaratuba Bays and shallowcontinental shelf bottoms, is reported. Altogether44 families, 164 genera, and 259 valid species arecurrently known from the area. The list, whichprovides a synthesis of the regional taxonomicalwork carried out until now, can serve as a baselinesurvey for future studies.
Article
INTRODUCTION AND METHODS During an investigation of distribution and ecology of the Archiannelida of the estuarine area of the rivers Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt in the southwestern part of The Netherlands, three species of polychaetes new to the Dutch fauna were found. Because these species have not been reported very frequently from other localities, the finds are described in some detail. The first two species were found in samples taken with a o.i m2 Van Veengrab; the last one originated from a core sample taken in the beach. After collecting the samples have been treated in the way described by Boaden (1963). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Hesionura augeneri (Friedrich, 1937) (fig. 2) This species was found at two localities in the coastal water (fig. 1) at depths of s and 8 m, respectively. The bottom consisted of medium sand. The salinity at these localities normally is over 16.5°/00 CI-. Description (fig. 2). — Length up to 20 mm =135 segments; diameter without parapodia up to 120 μ. Prostomium bluntly conical, but elongated in longer animals, distally with four antennae. Four small, sometimes barely visible eyes dorsally on the prostomium. First segment with one pair of ventral cirri, second segments with one pair of dorsal cirri as well. Parapodia of the third segment bearing setae and a ventral cirrus; all other parapodia with a dorsal cirrus as well. Ventral cirri longer than the dorsal ones; especially in larger specimens the ventral cirri have a deep brown colour. Parapodia uniramous with acicula and four setae, three being compound and one simple. Pygidium with two long cirri.
Article
Polychaetes of the genus Goniadella Hartman were found in Liverpool Bay, England, in sand and sandy gravel below depths of 15 m. The worms had most of the characteristics of G. gracilis (Verrill), a species previously recorded only from eastern North America and South Africa.
Article
Twenty-six abyssal polychaetes are named from the Mozambique basin off southeast Africa. Three species and two genera are new: Progoniada simplex, Berkeleyia profunda, Bruunilla natalensis, and another in Sphaerodoridae to be described elsewhere. A new family Fauveliopsidae is erected, its species previously allied with Flabelligeridae. Three species are known from Indo-Pacific regions: Glycera papillosa, Ammotrypane brevibranchiata, Phalacrostemma elegans. One, Axionice spinifera, is antarctic; another, Scalibregma inflata, is cosmopolitan. Five generic categories are chiefly or wholly abyssal: Ilyphagus, Fauveliopsis, Flabelligella, Monorchos, Potamethus. Nine genera are cosmopolitan: Aphrodita, Euphrosine, Phyllochaetopterus, Chaetozone, Ammotrypane, Nicomache, Myriochele, Serpula. Unidentifiable species are in families Lacydonidae, Onuphidae, and Ampharetidae. A compendium names abyssal species from depths of 2000 m or more; included are nearly 500 species in 240 genera and 51 families.
Family Goniadidae Kinberg, 1866b. Chapter 33
  • K M Gilbert
Gilbert, K.M., 1984. Family Goniadidae Kinberg, 1866b. Chapter 33. In Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico, vol. 5 (ed. J.M. Uebelacker and P.G. Johnson), pp. 33-1^33-19. Alabama: Mobile.