In his new book on the changing structure of television, the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1998) explores the vast forces of the 'market' in restructuring the content and delivery of television programmes. Television, he shows, is being 'dumbed down', its content restructured, and its social and educational mission degraded. Occupying a position of some ambivalence in relation to this restructuring project are the professionals--the journalists, interviewers and programme makers. These 'peer groups', as Bourdieu terms them, have the capacity either to blindly administer market commands or to respond in a more micro-political peer group manner. By its very nature, the latter pattern is semi-autonomous. Professional groups, through their practices, cannot be completely integrated. This perhaps explains the absence of support, notably financial, for professional groups initiated by the agencies of global capital over the past decade. Professional peer groups still retain considerable power to 'interfere' in the relationship between corporate businesses and consumers, and the State and its citizens. Looking at education, we can investigate the power to restructure teaching practices and peer group professional activities at a number of levels. Firstly, there is the traditional route of the 'status and resources game' played out in the univer