This dissertation deals with syllable drop in Capivari and Campinas’ dialects and the principle aim is to verify whether there is one single phonological rule or two distinct syllable drop rules for both cities.
This work is based on generative phonological theory and variacionist sociolinguistics, hence we analyze both linguistic and social variables. The linguistic factors analyzed were the segments (feature geometry, cf. Clements & Hume 1995), syllable structure (cf. Selkirk 1982), metrical structure (Hayes 1995), prosody (Nespor & Vogel 1986), number of syllables, and usage frequency for the first word in the context. As for the social factors, we analyzed the subjects schooling, gender, age, and city.
At segmental level, we have found that it is not important for the segments to be equal in Capivari, and it is in Campinas instead. As for the consonants, coronals are biased, and nasals disfavor the process, in both cities. On the other hand, there is a great difference in consonantal context concerning to dorsals: syllable drop is favored in Capivari and disfavored in Campinas. Considering the vowels, there are differences between the cities, since sequences of [coronal + coronal] and [dorso-labial + coronal] are unbiased in Capivari and favoring in Campinas.
At the suprasegmental level, both the dialects behave differently as for syllable structure if the first one is CV followed by other types of structures: the process is neutralized in Capivari and there is a favoring effect in Campinas. Regarding number of syllables, the size of the word undergoing the process is important in Capivari (bigger words are slightly biased), and this variable has not been selected in Campinas.
In relation to the lexical level, usage frequency of the first word (subjected to deletion) matters in Campinas (average frequency words slightly favor; high frequency words are unbiased, and low frequency words slightly disfavor). Since this variable was not selected in Capivari, we understand that there is a difference in usage frequency of words between the cities.
Therefore, we can conclude that there are segmental, suprasegmental e lexical differences in Capivari and Campinas. There are equal effects in the variable Oral Cavity of Consonants if [nasal] feature is not taken into account (this variable was never selected in the cities), and equal effects in Prosody variable (the results were very similar: the process is a slightly favored between phonological phrases, it is unbiased between clitic groups and it is slightly disfavored between entonational phrases).