Content uploaded by Ari Waisman
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ari Waisman on Jul 29, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
D2R striatopallidal neurons
inhibit both locomotor and
drug reward processes
Pierre F Durieux1, Bertrand Bearzatto1, Stefania Guiducci2,
Thorsten Buch3, Ari Waisman4, Michele Zoli2,
Serge N Schiffmann1,5 & Alban de Kerchove d’Exaerde1,5
The specific functions of dopamine D2receptor–positive (D2R)
striatopallidal neurons remain poorly understood. Using a
genetic mouse model, we found that ablation of D2R neurons in
the entire striatum induced hyperlocomotion, whereas ablation
in the ventral striatum increased amphetamine conditioned
place preference. Thus D2R striatopallidal neurons limit both
locomotion and, unexpectedly, drug reinforcement.
The striatum is critically involved in motor and motivational func-
tions1,2. The dorsal striatum, caudate-putamen, isprimarily implicated
in motor control and the learning of habits and skills, whereas
the ventral striatum, the nucleus accumbens (NAc), is essential for
motivation and drug reinforcement1,3. Striatal dysfunction has been
demonstrated in movement disorders, including Parkinson’s and
Huntington’s disease, and in psychiatric disorders, such as schizophre-
nia and drug addiction4.
The GABA medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs, about 95% of
striatal neurons), which are targets of the cerebral cortex and the
midbrain dopaminergic neurons, form two pathways5.Thedopamine
D1receptor–positive (D1R) striatonigral MSNs project to the medial
globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata (direct pathway)
and coexpress dopamine D1receptors and substance P, whereas D2R
striatopallidal MSNs project to the lateral globus pallidus (indirect
pathway) and coexpress dopamine D2receptor, adenosine A2A receptor
(A2AR) and enkephalin (Enk). The specific role of the two efferent
pathways in motor and motivational control remains poorly under-
stood. D1R striatonigral and D2R striatopallidal neurons, which are
intermingled and morphologically indistinguishable, cannot be func-
tionally dissociated with techniques such as chemical lesions or surgery
and the currently available tools for selective targeting of these
populations are unsatisfactory. The Drd1a-andDrd2-egfp transgenic
mice obtained by BAC transgenesis6have recently shed some light on
the role of MSN subpopulations or genes in striatal pathophysio-
logy7–10. In regards to their role in motivation and drug addiction,
current studies are focused mostly on the D1R striatonigral neurons2.
To assess the role of D2R striatopallidal neurons, we selectively
ablated these cells in adult mice by Cre-mediated expression of a
diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) and diphtheria toxin injection11
(Supplementary Methods online). All animal procedures were
approved by the Universite
´Libre de Bruxelles School of Medicine
Ethical Committee. We generated mice expressing Cre recombinase
under the control of the Adora2a (A2AR) promoter (Adora2a-cre mice,
Supplementary Fig. 1 online) by BAC transgenesis. A2AR was chosen
because it is expressed more in D2R neurons than in any other brain
area12 and, in contrast to D2R, A2AR is supposed to not be expressed in
striatal cholinergic interneurons and mesostriatal dopaminergic cells.
In Adora2a-cre mice mated with a Rosa26-LacZ reporter strain,
b-galactosidase staining was only found in striatal Enk-positive cells
(Supplementary Fig. 1), indicating that Cre was selectively expressed
in D2R striatopallidal neurons.
Adora2a-cre mice were crossed with mice in which the expression of
a simian DTR (Hbegf ) gene from a ubiquitously active promoter is
prevented by a loxP-flanked stop cassette (inducible DTR mice,
iDTR)11, leading to double transgenic Adora2a-cre/+; iDTR/+ mice
(DTR-positive mice) that selectively expressed DTR in D2Rstriatopal-
lidal neurons (Supplementar y Fig. 2 online). Toxin was stereotaxically
injected into the striatum to produce unilateral or bilateral ablation of
D2R neurons in the entire striatum (full ablation) or in the NAc (NAc
ablation). We analyzed the kinetics of D2R striatopallidal ablation in
DTR-positive mice with unilateral striatum diphtheria toxin injections
by quantifying A2AR binding sites from 3–28 d after diphtheria toxin
injections (Fig. 1a–c). The injected side showed a 65% and 45%
reduction in A2AR binding in the dorsal and ventral striatum, respec-
tively, at 7 d after injections, and an almost complete loss of striatal
A2AR binding (97% in dorsal and 87% in ventral striatum) from 14 d
after diphtheria toxin injections, with no reduction in striatonigral
neuron–specific D1Rbinding(Fig. 1a–c). We found no changes in
binding sites in diphtheria toxin–injected control littermates lacking
DTR expression (Adora2a-cre–/–;iDTR/+; DTR negative mice) or in
saline-injected DTR-positive mice. The disappearance of D2Rstriato-
pallidal neuron mRNAs (D2R, A2AR and Enk) and the preservation of
D1R striatonigral neuron mRNAs (D1R and substance P) on the
injected side at 14 d after injections (Fig. 1d,e) confirmed the specificity
of the lesion. The same pattern of ablation was detected from
the anterior to the posterior striatum (Supplementar y Fig. 3 online).
The four subpopulations of striatal interneurons remained intact
(Supplementary Fig. 4 online).
In light of the connections between midbrain dopamine and striatal
neurons, we investigated the consequences of D2R striatopallidal
neuron loss on the mesostriatal dopamine system. Bilateral full ablation
of D2R striatopallidal neurons did not modify cell body or terminal
dopaminergic markers (Supplementary Fig. 5 online). To assess
dopaminergic function in vivo, we carried out intrastriatal micro-
dialysis in bilateral diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-positive and
Received 19 December 2008; accepted 28 January 2009; published online 8 March 2009; doi:10.1038/nn.2286
1Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Universite
´Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 2Department of Biomedical Sciences, Section of Physiology, University of Modena and
Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. 3Department of Pathology, Institute of Experimental Immunology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 4First Medical Department,
Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. 5These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence should be addressed to A.d.K.d.E.
(adekerch@ulb.ac.be).
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 12
[
NUMBER 4
[
APRIL 2009 393
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
© 2009 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.
DTR-negative mice. No difference in basal dopamine extracellular
concentration or in amphetamine (AMPH)-induced dopamine over-
flow was found between the two genotypes (Supplementary
Fig. 5). These results indicate that D2R striatopallidal neuron ablation
does not induce major modifications in striatal dopaminergic function.
As D2R neurons send GABAergic projections to GABA neurons of
the globus pallidus, we assessed the effect of bilateral D2Rneuronloss
on glutamic acid decarboxylase isoform 67 mRNA levels in the globus
pallidus as an indirect index of GABA neuron activity13 (Supplemen-
tary Fig. 6 online). We found an increase in glutamic acid decarbox-
ylase isoform 67 mRNA in the globus pallidus of DTR-positive mice as
compared with DTR-negative mice, confirming that the D2R striato-
pallidal neurons exert inhibitory control on globus pallidus GABA
neuron activity.
Locomotor activity in open fieldboxes was recorded daily for 30 min
(Fig. 2) in mice that underwent bilateral full striatum diphtheria toxin
injections. Starting at 6 d after diphtheria toxin injections, DTR-
positive mice became threefold to fourfold more active than controls
(Supplementary Video 1 online). This hyperactivity was stable
through day 16 (Fig. 2c) and DTR-positive mice were still hyperactive
(207 ± 19% of control level) 33 d after diphtheria toxin injection (data
not shown). These results demonstrate the inhibitory function of the
D2R striatopallidal neurons on locomotor activity.
As the ventral striatum is the key neuronal substrate for drug
reinforcement3,wecarriedoutaNAcD
2R striatopallidal neuron
ablation in DTR-positive mice (Fig. 2d,e). Enk mRNA levels in the
ventral striatum of diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-positive mice
decreased by 80% compared with control diphtheria toxin–injected
DTR-negative mice. We found a 30% reduction in Enk mRNA in the
dorsal striatum, selectively in its rostral part. Because dorsal striatum
shows progressive rostro-caudal enlargement, this limited rostral loss
modestly influenced the overall number of D2R striatopallidal neurons
in the dorsal striatum. NAc ablation did not show spontaneous
hyperlocomotion (Supplementary Fig. 7 online), demonstrating that
the NAc ablation of D2R striatopallidal neurons is functionally different
from the full ablation. NAc DTR-positive mice were examined in an
AMPH (1, 3 or 5 mg per kg) conditioned place preference (CPP)
procedure followed by an examination of CPP extinction over 1 week
(Fig. 2f). The DTR-positive mice showed a higher preference for the
AMPH-paired compartment as compared with controls on the first test
day (2 d after the last AMPH injection) and maintained greater CPP on
the following test days (4 and 9 d after last AMPH injection) (see
Supplementary Methods for statistical analyses). Note that there was a
loss of CPP for DTR-negative mice on day 9 (AMPH 1 and 3 mg per
kg), whereas DTR-positive mice still showed a preference for the
AMPH-paired compartment.
In summary, our results provide direct experimental evidence that
D2R striatopallidal neurons are critical for both the control of motor
behavior and drug reinforcement. The Adora2a-cre/+;iDTR/+ mouse,
allowing specific D2R striatopallidal neuron ablation, confirmed that
D1R–substance P–expressing and D2R-A2AR-Enk–expressing neurons
in the striatum are largely segregated. This model shows the advantage
of A2AR- over D2R-targeted transgenic mice for targeting D2Rstriato-
pallidal neurons, as A2AR does not target striatal cholinergic interneur-
ons and dopaminergic afferents14, thus avoiding cholinergic alterations
and distinguishing between post- and presynaptic dopaminergic
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
EnkSubstance P
DTR+DTR+
DTR–DTR–
Relative A2AR
mRNA levels (%)
Relative D2R
mRNA levels (%)
Relative Enk
mRNA levels (%)
Relative D1R
mRNA levels (%)
Relative
substance P
mRNA levels (%)
A2AR
A2AR
D1R
D2R
0
20
35791113151728
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Realtive binding levels (%)
Realtive binding levels (%)
Dorsal
striatum
Ventral
striatum
Dorsal
striatum
Ventral
striatum
Dorsal
striatum
Ventral
striatum
Dorsal
striatum
Ventral
striatum
Dorsal
striatum
Ventral
striatum
Dorsal
striatum
Ventral
striatum
*** ***
*** ***
*** ***
***
***
***
***
a
b
d
***
** ***
**
DTR+ DT A2ARDTR– DT A2AR
DTR+ DT D1RDTR+ DT D1R
DTR+ DT A2AR DTR– DT A2AR
DTR– DT D1R DTR– DT D1R
DTR+ saline A2AR
DTR+ saline D1R
e
c
Day 3 Day 7 Day 14 Day 28
D1R
Days after unilateral DT or saline injections Days after unilateral DT or saline injections
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 28
DTR+ saline A2AR
DTR+ saline D1R
Figure 1 Characterization of D2R striatopallidal neuron ablation after full striatum unilateral diphtheria toxin injections in DTR-positive mice (coronal sections,
level +1.2 mm relative to bregma). (a) Autoradiograms of A2ARs and D1Rs, markers of D2R striatopallidal and D1R striatonigral neurons, respectively, from
3–28 d after unilateral full striatum diphtheria toxin injections in DTR-positive (DTR+) mice, showing kinetics and specificity of the D2R striatopallidal neuron
ablation. (b,c)A
2ARandD
1R binding levels in the dorsal (b) and ventral (c) striatum of diphtheria toxin (DT)-injected DTR-positive mice and controls
(diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-negative (DTR–) or saline-injected DTR-positive mice) (n¼39 in each group). (d)In situ hybridization autoradiograms of
D2R striatopallidal (A2AR, D2R and Enk) and D1R striatonigral (D1R and substance P) neuron mRNAs at 14 d after unilateral full striatum diphtheria toxin
injections. (e) Striatopallidal (A2AR, D2R and Enk) and striatonigral (D1R and substance P) neuron mRNA levels at 14 d after diphtheria toxin injections (n¼7
in each group). Data are expressed as optical density values of the injected side in percent of the uninjected side. Arrows indicate the injected side. Scale bars
represent 1 mm. Data are reported as mean ± s.e.m. *** Po0.001 (as compared with diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-injected mice); ** P o0.001 (as
compared with saline-injected DTR-positive mice).
394 VOLUME 12
[
NUMBER 4
[
APRIL 2009 NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
© 2009 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.
mechanisms. The complete bilateral ablation of these neurons induces
persistent spontaneous hyperlocomotion, demonstrating a functional
effect of D2R striatopallidal neuron loss and validating the hypothesis
that A2AR-D2R–expressing neurons normally inhibit motor activity1.
The increase in AMPH CPP following ablation of D2R striatopallidal
neurons mainly in the NAc was unanticipated and is, to the best of our
knowledge, the first experimental demonstration that the pathway in
which these neurons take part normally inhibits drug reinforcement.
These data suggest that, similar to what has been observed for motor
control, reciprocal antagonism between D2R striatopallidal and
D1R striatonigral neurons is crucial for motivational processes and
reinforcement. The involvement of D2Rs in drug reward processes is
still puzzling15,asD
2Rs are expressed at many sites in the striatal
network. Our results suggest that the activation of postsynaptic D2Rs
on D2R striatopallidal neurons in the NAc facilitates drug reinforce-
ment by inhibiting these neurons4,15.
Together, these data show that Adora2a-cre/+;iDTR/+ mice are a
useful movement disorder model and underscore the need for char-
acterization of the specific cellular and molecular modifications that are
induced in D2R striatopallidal neurons by drugs of abuse.
Note: Supplementary information is available on the Nature Neuroscience website.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank M. Picciotto for helpful and critical comments on the manuscript and
D. Houtteman, S. Laghmiri and L. Cuvelier for expert technical assistance. P.F.D.
is Research Fellow of the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (bourse de doctorat
Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique) and A.d.K.d.E. is a Research Associate of the
DTR–DTR+
DTR–DTR+
Enk
rostral striatum
Enk
rostral striatum
Enk
caudal striatum
Enk
caudal striatum
Days before and after bilateral DT or saline injections
Horizontal distance in 30 min (cm)
–150
–100
–50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Day 2 after last
AMPH injection
Day 4 after last
AMPH injection
Day 9 after last
AMPH injection
Score (s)
f
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Relative Enk mRNA levels (%)Relative Enk mRNA levels (%)
***
Rostral striatum
Caudal
striatum
DTR+ saline DTR+ saline
DTR– DT DTR– DT
DTR– DT
DTR+ DT
DTR– DT
DTR+ DT
DTR+ DT DTR+ DT
** ** **
*** *** ***
***
**
** ** ** ** **
******
******
*** *** ***
***
***
Injections
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
AMPH
(mg per kg)
Rostral striatum
Caudal
striatum
a
de
bc
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
–3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
01350135 0135 01350135 0135
** **
Dorsal Ventral
Dorsal Ventral
Figure 2 Behavioral consequences of D2R striatopallidal neuron removal and quantification of the D2R striatopallidal neuron ablation. (a)In situ hybridization
autoradiograms of Enk mRNA in rostral (level +1.2 mm relative to bregma) and caudal (level 0.1 mm relative to bregma) coronal brain sections of full striatum
diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-positive and DTR-negative mice. (b) Quantification of Enk mRNA levels in rostral and caudal striatum. Data are expressed as
optical density values of the injected striatum in DTR-positive in percent of DTR-negative mice (n¼611 per group). (c) Locomotor activity of DTR-positive
and control mice 3 d before to 16 d after full striatum bilateral diphtheria toxin injections (n¼17 in diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-positive group and n¼6
per group in control DTR-negative diphtheria toxin–injected and saline–injected DTR-positive groups). (d,e)In situ hybridization autoradiogr ams (d)ofEnk
mRNA in rostral (level +1.2 mm relative to bregma) and caudal (level 0.1 mm relative to bregma) coronal brain sections of NAc diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-
positive and DTR-negative mice and quantification of Enk mRNA levels (e). Data are expressed as optical density values of the injected striatum as a percentage
of DTR-negative mice (n¼34–39 per group). (f) CPP for AMPH of diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-positive and DTR-negative mice. Preference score was
measured at days 2, 4 and 9 after the last AMPH injection (n¼8–14 in each group). Arrows indicate the injected side. Scale bars represent 1 mm. Data are
reported as mean ± s.e.m. Statistical comparisons were made between diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-positive mice and respective control mice. * Po0.05,
*** Po0.001 (as compared with diphtheria toxin–injected DTR-positive mice); ** P o0.001 (as compared with saline-injected DTR-positive mice).
Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium). This study was supported
by Fondation Me
´dicale Reine Elisabeth (Belgium), Fonds de la Recherche
Scientifique (Belgium), Fonds d’Encouragement a
`la Recherche from the
Universite
´Libre de Bruxelles, Action de Recherche Concerte
´e from the
Communaute
´Franc¸ aise Wallonie Bruxelles and Ministero Italiano dell’Universita
`
e della Ricerca (grant number PRIN20072BTSR2) to M.Z.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
P.F.D., S.N.S. and A.d.K.d.E. conceived and designed the experiments. P.F.D.,
A.d.K.d.E., B.B. and S.G. carried out the experiments. T.B. and A.W. contributed
materials. P.F.D., M.Z., S.N.S. and A.d.K.d.E. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Published online at http://www.nature.com/natureneuroscience/
Reprints and permissions information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/
reprintsandpermissions/
1. Graybiel, A.M. Curr. Biol. 10, 509–511 (2000).
2. Hyman, S.E., Malenka, R.C. & Nestler, E.J. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 565–598
(2006).
3. Everitt, B.J. & Robbins, T.W. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1481–1489 (2005).
4. Albin, R.L., Young, A.B. & Penney, J.B. Trends Neurosci. 12, 366–375 (1989).
5. Gerfen, C.R. et al. Science 250, 1429–1432 (1990).
6. Gong, S. et al. Nature 425, 917–925 (2003).
7. Lobo, M.K., Karsten, S.L., Gray, M., Geschwind, D.H. & Yang, X.W. Nat. Neurosci. 9,
443–452 (2006).
8. Shen, W. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1458–1466 (2007).
9. Kreitzer, A.C. & Malenka, R.C. Nature 445, 643–647 (2007).
10. Bertran–Gonzalez, J. J. Neurosci. 28, 5671–5685 (2008).
11. Buch, T. et al. Nat. Methods 2, 419–426 (2005).
12. Schiffmann, S.N. & Vanderhaeghen, J.J. J. Neurosci. 13, 1080–1087 (1993).
13. Chesselet, M.F. et al. Prog. Brain Res. 99, 143–154 (1993).
14. Sano, H. et al. J. Neurosci. 23, 9078–9088 (2003).
15. Self, D.W. Neuropharmacology 47, 242–255 (2004).
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE VOLUME 12
[
NUMBER 4
[
APRIL 2009 395
BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
© 2009 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved.