... Collaboration in the SC is influenced by its structure, and because collaboration is difficult to implement, many times the echelons of the SC suffer from a lack of coordination mechanisms with several operative consequences even if it is demonstrated that coordination enhances the performances of both the supplier and the Retailer (Sheu et al., 2006). It is Persona et al., 2005Henning, 2009Takahashi & Nakamura, 2004Elofson et al., 2007Masuchun et al, 2004Bowersox et al., 1999Lehtonen, 1998Bhaskaran, 1998Olhager, 2003Chiang et al., 2003Hameri & Nikkola, 2001Huang et al., 2006Kwon et al., 2007Kulp et al., 2004Sheu et al., 2006Papadakis, 2006Umeda & Zhang, 2006Malhotra et al., 2005Moyaux et al., 2007Beaudoin et al., 2007Power & Singh, 2007Wang & Shihua, 2004Jung et al, 2008Yang et al, 2007He & Liu, 2003Tribowski et al., 2009Jiang et al., 2010Lee et al., 2006Hof fman, 2006Pereira et al., 2009Pattersen et al., 2009 important to underline that in the past, the main elements to achieve collaboration were put up as evidence. Indeed, based on a survey conducted in the industrial districts of northern Taiwan, it is possible to understand that the position in the network and the firm sizes are key factors-in terms of business success-for coordination and consequently, for the management of the SC (Wang et al., 2004). ...