In this work, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the following key points:
1. The relationship between the magnitude of a triggered event and the properties of the seismicity preceding it;
2. The role of the tectonic environment on the earthquakes clustering properties;
3. The (often ignored) presence of potential sources of bias in the b-value estimation that could severely affect any claim about the use of the b-value as a precursor of large earthquakes.
This dissertation is organized in three chapters, one for each listed point. Chapter I and Chapter II consist of manuscripts published on Geophysical Journal International and Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America journals, respectively.
Chapter III is a document that has been partly included in a publication on Geophysical Journal International.
In Chapter I, we focus on the magnitude-independence assumption (the magnitude of any earthquake is independent from the past), which stands behind the most common earthquake forecasting models. The reliability of this assumption, which severely limits the capability to forecast large earthquakes with high probabilities, has been questioned by several authors, who found evidence for correlated magnitudes and/or different seismicity patterns before earthquakes of different magnitudes. Our goal is to contribute to this discussion by empirically investigating the validity of the magnitude-independence assumption through a comprehensive and rigorous analysis. Specifically: i) we implement a metric-based correlation (inspired by the nearest-neighbor method proposed by Baiesi and Paczuski (2004) and elaborated by Zaliapin et al. (2008)) to identify the precursory seismicity, avoiding the use of space-time-magnitude windows for the identification of foreshocks, mainshocks and aftershocks; ii) we consider different instrumental catalogs and multiple synthetic (ETAS) catalogs; iii) we carefully consider spatiotemporal variations of the magnitude of completeness when statistically comparing the frequency-magnitude distribution of background and triggered earthquakes; iv) we statistically analyze different space-time-magnitude features of the seismicity which anticipates a triggered event. Our findings are in agreement with the magnitude-independence assumption which stands behind the most common earthquake forecast models. We find only one departure from the expected model: larger events tend to nucleate at a higher distance from the ongoing sequence. This result, which confirms the findings of a previous independent study, could be hopefully used to improve the current forecasting models. We also notice that the reliability of the magnitude-independence assumption may depend on the spatial scale considered, as we identify possible departures in small areas, which could reflect different ways to release locally seismic energy. Finally, we show that some significant departures from the magnitude-independence assumption do not survive when considering spatiotemporal variations of the magnitude of completeness.
In Chapter II, we contribute to answer the following question: do earthquake cluster properties change depending on the tectonic environment under consideration? The common answer to this question is positive, and it is generally based on discrepancies observed among a limited number of seismic sequences pertaining different tectonic environments. We contribute to this discussion analyzing the clustering properties in three areas related to distinct tectonic regimes: Italy, Southern California and Japan. Specifically, we investigate on this aspect by i) adopting the nearest-neighbor method [Baiesi and Paczuski (2004); Zaliapin et al. (2008)] to identify all the sequences of triggered events; ii) implementing a comprehensive statistical analysis of several features of the seismicity recorded in different instrumental catalogs. We demonstrate that sequences of triggered events are characterized by comparable distributions through the three regions, though the latter are characterized by a different dominant fault type (compressional, extensional or strike-slip). We conclude that, at least for active seismic crustal regions, the tectonic regime does not seem to play a key role in affecting the spatiotemporal clustering properties. These findings have two important implications: first, they suggest that calibrating earthquake forecast models based on the specific tectonic regime may not be necessary, at least in the case of active seismic crustal regions; second, they support the use of common declustering models, avoiding the need to re-calibrate them according to the tectonic environment. As regards the background seismicity, it shows some significant departures from the hypothesis of a stationary Poisson process when looking at short time scales (1-year time intervals). This could suggest transient perturbations of the background seismicity rate due to undetected seismicity or to localized physical processes, whose effects seem to decrease on longer time scales.
In Chapter III, we focus on the b-value estimation biases. The main motivation is that its variability has often been used to advocate its use as an earthquake precursor, and/or as a stress indicator. We first provide a broad review of the most common procedures for identifying temporal variations, which have been linked to the preparatory phase of large earthquakes. As a matter of fact, many studies claim that a decrease of the b-value occurs before large earthquakes, a feature which is generally explained in terms of increased stress. We then argue that several factors, which are very often neglected in seismology, may induce bias in the b-value estimation and lead to apparent variations that do not have any real physical meaning. To show that, we: i) analyze three theoretical biases: the Jensen inequality, the normal approximation for the b-value error estimate, and the correlation between the b-value and the maximum foreshock magnitude in the sequence; ii) we quantify (by numerical simulations) the bias induced by an improper magnitude of completeness selection, which affects the analysis of real seismic catalogs. We show that: i) the Jensen inequality and the normal approximation for the b-value error estimate influence, at different degree, the b-value and its uncertainty for catalogs with less than 100 data; ii) the maximum magnitude in the dataset may introduce a bias in the b-value estimate, by yielding a systematic underestimation of the b-value when a large earthquake is included; this bias is particularly severe for small datasets (N <= 500); iii) it is very likely to estimate a significantly low b-value only as a consequence of the incompleteness of the catalog and goodness-of-fits test, such as the Lilliefors test, could fail to spot an incomplete recording for small datasets, making this bias very difficult to be recognized: iv) assuming, for any space-time subset of a catalog, the same completeness threshold as for the whole catalog could induce strong errors. Our analysis casts doubt on many claims in the literature about significant b-value variations.