Preface
Groundwater is one of mankind’s most important natural resources because it is the main source of drinking water. Contaminated sites resulting from industrial activity, mining, improper waste disposal or accidents involving hazardous substances pose a permanent threat to aquifers. Harmful chemicals can leach from polluted areas, for instance through rain water infiltrating the soil, and migrate downwards until they reach an underlying aquifer. The groundwater may become contaminated as a result and no longer usable as drinking water. It is, therefore, very important to develop and implement methods of preventing and reducing groundwater pollution. Pump-and-treat, the most frequently used conventional method for groundwater remediation, exhibits a number of shortcomings, while permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) represent a new and innovative technology with many advantageous features.
PRBs enable physical, chemical or biological in situ treatment of contaminated groundwater by bringing it into contact with reactive materials. The reactive material is inserted underground in a natural aquifer and intercepts the pollution plume as it is carried along within the aquifer, and thus the contaminants are treated without either wholesale soil excavation or water pumping. This cost-effective clean-up technology has much less impact on the environment than other methods, and since it requires hardly any energy input during operation, it is generally more economical over the long term than methods such as pump-and-treat that require continuous energy input.
While extensive research has been performed on many technological aspects of PRBs, and a number of contaminants have already been successfully treated by PRB systems, long-term performance has not been extensively considered and little is known about the processes influencing the long-term behaviour. This gap in our knowledge is all the more problematic because design life has a decisive influence on the economic viability of PRBs.
This book describes methods for the evaluation and enhancement of the long-term performance of PRB systems, especially of those targeting heavy metals such as uranium and organic contaminants, by sorption and/or precipitation mechanisms. The contents originate mainly from original research work performed within an international collaborative project funded by the European Commission. The project was called “Long-Term Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers Used for the Remediation of Contaminated Groundwater” (acronym: “PEREBAR”) and was undertaken between the years 2000 and 2003. Processes that impair the barrier performance during PRB operation, and technologies to enhance the long-term efficacy of PRB systems were studied qualitatively and quantitatively. Two case study sites formed the central part of the project. The primary case study site was the former Hungarian uranium ore mining and processing area near the city of Pe´cs in Southern Hungary. The second site is located in Brunn am Gebirge, Austria, where an activated carbon PRB system is installed to treat a plume of organic contaminants at a former industrial site.
The first two chapters of this book introduce the field of PRBs as an innovative technology for passive groundwater remediation. Chapter 1 gives a brief introduction to the concept of PRBs. Potential reactive materials and the major biogeochemical mechanisms that can be utilised in PRBs are presented, and design considerations discussed. Particular attention is given to an up-to-date review on the application of PRBs, especially on the experiences and lessons learnt about the long-term performance of fullscale installations. Chapter 2 describes the practical aspects of PRB construction. In the first part of this chapter, cut-off wall construction methods are described, since PRB construction techniques are based firmly on experience gathered with these methods and because cut-off walls are integral parts of some PRB designs (e.g. funnel-and-gate systems). In the second part, PRB design considerations and construction techniques (including some innovative techniques) are explicitly discussed.
The next four chapters focus on the removal of uranium from contaminated groundwater by a selection of reactive materials including zeolites, hydroxyapatite (HAP) and elemental iron (Fe0, also widely referred to as “zero-valent iron” (ZVI)). The driving force behind the investigations described in these chapters was the case study site in Pe´cs, Hungary. Therefore the experimental conditions develop, chapter by chapter, towards the actual field conditions at that site. Chapter 3 describes the results of batch experiments conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of natural zeolitic tuff, hydroxyapatite, activated carbon, hydrated lime, elemental iron and iron oxides in removing uranium from aqueous solution. The experiments were conducted with simple solutions of uranyl nitrate dissolved in deionised water. It was found that elemental iron and hydroxyapatite are the most effective materials in removing uranium from water. Therefore, further experiments focused on these two materials.
Column experiments described in Chapter 4 showed that elemental iron and hydroxyapatite have strong uranium attenuation capabilities. The column experiments also showed the susceptibility of elemental iron to corrosion effects and the formation of secondary mineral precipitates due to the extreme geochemical conditions inside the iron matrix. A special feature of the column experiments was the development of a nondestructive method to measure the propagation of the uranium front during an experiment using a radiotracer. The column experiments were conducted with an artificial groundwater with a composition close to that of the case study site in Pe´cs. Chapter 5 describes the set-up and results of laboratory experiments conducted with groundwater taken from monitoring wells at the site in Pe´cs. These experiments focussed again on elemental iron and hydroxyapatite, and were conducted as column experiments and floor-scale box experiments (at cubic meter scale). The results of the experiments showed that the composition of the local groundwater, with its high concentrations of Ca, Mg, HCO3 and SO4, has a significant impact on the long-term functioning of PRB systems based on elemental iron.
Laboratory-based experiments are usually subject to rather artificial boundary conditions, and a number of crucial parameters and groundwater constituents may differ significantly from real field conditions. Therefore, with the experiments described in Chapter 6, the step from the laboratory to the field was taken. On-site column experiments with elemental iron and hydroxyapatite were designed and operated at a field test location on the former Hungarian uranium ore-processing site near the city of Pe´cs. The test site was located downstream of a large uranium-bearing waste rock pile where the shallow local groundwater showed significantly elevated concentrations of dissolved uranium. To simulate different flow conditions, small-scale columns were installed and operated within monitoring wells, and large-scale column experiments were located and operated very close to the monitoring wells used to supply their influent groundwater. The results of these on-site (and even partly in situ) column experiments showed that both elemental iron and hydroxyapatite effectively remove uranium from contaminated groundwater under field conditions. For elemental iron it could also be shown that the residence time of the contaminated groundwater in the reactive material controls, to some extent, the change of overall groundwater composition. It can be concluded that the volume of the reactive zone and the groundwater flow-velocity through the reactive zone are important design parameters for controlling adverse effects that occur within the elemental iron barriers (such as precipitation of secondary minerals) and are thus important to the long-term performance and operating life of iron-based PRBs.
The next two chapters address innovative ideas on improving the performance of PRBs, especially with respect to their long-term behaviour. Chapter 7 describes the development and testing of a new reactive material designed to sequester uranium (VI) from contaminated groundwater. This material, named PANSIL, consists of a polymeric resin coated onto the surface of quartz sand. The advantage of PANSIL is that it is selective towards the uranyl ion, available in a granular and durable form (important considerations for materials to be used in a PRB system), and does not have any side-effects on either the groundwater composition or the geochemical conditions in the barrier, and thus avoids secondary effects such as coating or clogging of the reactive matrix. Chapter 8 evaluates the feasibility of electrokinetic methods to positively affect the long-term efficiency of PRBs. The approach of coupling electrokinetic processes with PRB systems to reduce the advective transport of groundwater constituents that may impair the barrier function was studied in a series of laboratory experiments. The results described in this chapter suggest that the installation of an electrokinetic fence upstream of the barrier could indeed electrokinetically trap such groundwater constituents outside the barrier.
Chapters 9–11 report investigations and research work conducted at the two case study sites in Hungary and Austria. The characteristics of the former Hungarian uranium ore mining and processing site near the city of Pe´cs in Southern Hungary, including its pollution history, hydrogeology and ongoing remediation activities, are presented in Chapter 9. The chapter also describes the site investigations carried out to find and characterise a suitable location for an experimental PRB system to treat the uraniumcontaminated groundwater. In Chapter 10, the design, construction and operation of an experimental elemental iron barrier at the Pe´cs case study site are described. The aim of this pilot-scale barrier is the removal of dissolved uranium from the local groundwater. It consists of 38 tonnes of shredded cast iron placed in a shallow aquifer in a small valley downstream of a large, uranium-bearing waste rock pile. During the first year of operation uranium removal from the groundwater by the experimental barrier has been very successful. At the same time the change in overall groundwater composition of the barrier effluent indicated that strong geochemical processes were taking place inside the barrier material. These processes include the formation of significant amounts of precipitates, mainly carbonates, which in the long-term might lead to changes in the hydraulic properties of the system. Chapter 11 describes the geological, hydrogeological and environmental characteristics of a former industrial site in Brunn am Gebirge, Austria which is heavily contaminated with organic contaminants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), hydrocarbons, BTEX, phenols and chlorinated hydrocarbons. A groundwater remediation scheme, called a “Adsorptive Reactor and Barrier (AR&B) System”, has been implemented at the site. This system is designed as a hydraulic barrier with four gates that funnel the groundwater through adsorptive reactors containing activated carbon. This chapter also describes the routine monitoring applied at the site to document the groundwater clean-up efficiency of the AR&B system and additional sampling and testing conducted at the activated carbon reactors to investigate those hydrogeochemical parameters that may allow an assessment of the long-term performance of the system.
In the final chapter, Chapter 12, some issues concerning the regulatory acceptance of PRBs and cost data currently available for PRBs are discussed. By addressing the issue of long-term performance of PRBs, an important aspect of this technology, we aim to advance PRB technology as an accepted, scientifically sound, costeffective and stable tool for passive groundwater remediation. Thus we hope to contribute, with this book, to an improvement in pollution management and a reduction in the exposure of groundwater resources to harmful pollutants, and thereby safeguard water resources for future generations.
Karl Ernst Roehl, Karlsruhe, Germany
Tamas Meggyes, Franz-Georg Simon, Berlin, Germany
D. I. Stewart, Leeds, United Kingdom