Content uploaded by Rebecca A. Battista
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Rebecca A. Battista on Feb 11, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Pattern of developing the performance template
C Foster,
1
K J Hendrickson,
1
K Peyer,
1
B Reiner,
1
J J deKoning,
2
A Lucia,
3
R A Battista,
1
F J Hettinga,
2
J P Porcari,
1
G Wright
1
1
Department of Exercise and
Sport Science, University of
Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse,
Wisconsin, USA;
2
Research
Institute MOVE, VU University-
Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands;
3
Department of
Exercise Physiology, European
University of Madrid, Madrid,
Spain
Correspondence to:
Professor C Foster, Department
of Exercise and Sports Science,
University of Wisconsin-La
Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601,
USA; foster.carl@uwlax.edu
Accepted 7 December 2008
Published Online First
5 January 2009
ABSTRACT
Background: The pattern of energy expenditure during
sustained high-intensity exercise is influenced by several
variables. Data from athletic populations suggest that a
pre-exercise conceptual model, or template, is a central
variable relative to controlling energy expenditure.
Aims: The aim of this study was to make systematic
observations regarding how the performance template
develops in fit individuals who have limited specific
experience with sustained high-intensity exercise (eg,
time trials).
Methods: The study was conducted in four parts and
involved measuring performance (time and power output)
during: (A) six 3 km cycle time trials, (B) three 2 km
rowing time trials, (C) four 2 km rowing time trials with a
training period between trials 2 and 3, and (D) three
10 km cycle time trials. All time trials were self-paced
with feedback to the subjects regarding previous
performances and momentary pace.
Results: In all four series of time trials there was a
progressive pattern of improved performance averaging
6% over the first three trials and 10% over six trials. In all
studies improvement was associated with increased
power output during the early and middle portions of the
time trial and a progressively greater terminal rating of
perceived exertion. Despite the change in the pattern of
energy expenditure, the subjects did not achieve the
pattern usually displayed by athletes during comparable
events.
Conclusions: This study concludes that the pattern of
learning the performance template is primarily related to
increased confidence that the trial can be completed
without unreasonable levels of exertion or injury, but that
the process takes more than six trials to be complete.
The pattern of power output during self-paced
exercise has been suggested to be regulated in an
anticipatory manner, the ‘‘anticipatory feedback-
RPE model.’’
1
This pattern has been observed in
our previous results
2–5
and elsewhere,
6–10
is resistant
to change
11
and, when forced to change, is
associated with performance decrements.
12 13
During repeated sprint exercise, this anticipated
regulation is less evident
14
Other studies have
shown that humans adjust muscle power output
during prolonged exercise based on sensory feed-
back derived from progressively fatiguing muscles,
irrespective of previous competitive experience.
15–18
Given the importance of the apparently prepro-
grammed performance template to the anticipa-
tory feedback RPE model,
1
there are surprisingly
limited systematically collected data regarding how
this template develops, how it relates to practice
patterns and the number of trials required for a
stable template to develop. Accordingly, the
purpose of this study was to observe the pattern
of power output and performance with successive
exercise bouts in different groups of well-trained
individuals, during different types of exercise, and
with reference to the effects of training.
METHODS
All subjects provided written informed consent,
and the individual protocols were approved by the
university human subjects committee. In all
studies the subjects were very fit via other
elements of their lifestyle (.5 h/week of aerobic
exercise) but uniformly had little experience with
cycling or rowing time trials. Data on the subjects
are provided in table 1.
The study was conducted in four parts. In Part
A, the response to six 3 km cycle time trials was
observed with reference to the pattern of power
output. In Part B, the responses to three 2 km
rowing ergometer trials was observed. In Part C,
the effect of rowing practice on the power output
pattern during four 2 km rowing ergometer trials
was observed. In Part D, the response of recrea-
tional level cycle competitors was observed during
three 10 km cycling time trials.
In Part A, subjects performed incremental cycle
ergometer exercise to document fitness, habituate
the subjects and determine whether fitness
improved as a result of the repeated time trials.
The exercise protocol involved 3 min at a power
output of 25 W +25 W per minute until the subject
could not maintain a pedalling rate within 60–
90 rpm. Respiratory gas exchange data were
measured using open-circuit spirometry (AEI,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). Ventilatory (VT) and
respiratory compensation (RCT) thresholds were
determined according to standard methods.
19
Heart
rate (HR) was measured using radio telemetry.
Between incremental tests, the subjects performed
six 3 km cycle time trials on an electronically
braked racing cycle ergometer (Racer Mate, Seattle,
Washington) with 48–96 h of light exercise
between ttials. Prior to each time trial (in this
and all other parts of the study), the subject
performed a standard 10 min warm-up, with the
first 2 min at 25 W, the next 3 min at a power
output calculated to require ,75% of the VO
2
at
VT and the last 5 min at a power output calculated
to require ,90% of the VO
2
at VT. Following the
warm-up, the subject rested for 2 min before
beginning the time trial. To prevent excessive
starting forces on the ergometer frame, 30 s before
the beginning of the time trial the subject began
pedalling at 25 W. At the beginning of the time
trial, the subject was instructed to ‘‘begin racing’’
with the only instruction being to complete the
3 km as quickly as possible. During the trial, the
subject had feedback from the ergometer display,
Original article
Br J Sports Med 2009;43:765–769. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054841 765
group.bmj.com on June 1, 2013 - Published by bjsm.bmj.comDownloaded from
including velocity, power output, HR and distance completed.
During the trial, the subject rated their level of exertion using
the category ratio (0–10) Rating of Perceived Exertion scale
20
after each 300 m. After the trials, the data were averaged based
on the time required to complete each 300 m (eg, 10% of total
distance).
In Part B, the subjects performed an incremental test on a
wind-braked rowing ergometer (Concept II, Morrisville,
Vermont) for characterisation. The initial power output was
0.5 W 6body weight in kg, and was incremented by this
amount each minute until fatigue. Respiratory gas exchange
was performed using open-circuit spirometry as described
above. Subsequently, each subject performed three 2 km time
trials on the rowing ergometer, with 48–96 h between trials.
Other than to finish as quickly as possible, the subjects were
given no instructions. Each subject was informed of their
preceding best performance and had full access to information
about distance completed and momentary pace (eg, 500 m split)
from the ergometer display. The data were averaged and
analysed every 200 m (eg, 10% distance).
In Part C, the subjects performed incremental testing for
habituation and characterisation, as in Part B. Subsequently,
each subject performed two 2 km time trials on the rowing
ergometer, with no instructions other than to finish in the
shortest possible time. During the next month, the subjects
performed two rowing training sessions per week (total = 8),
with one training session being continuous and one interval,
with a total distance of 4–6 km. Specific instructions about
rowing technique were not provided. However, the subjects
were informed that the goal of the training was to allow them
to improve their performance for subsequent time trials.
Following this training, they performed two additional 2 km
rowing time trials. The subjects had access to their previous
performances, momentary distance completed and momentary
pace from the ergometer display. Data were averaged every
200 m.
In Part D, the subjects performed a preliminary incremental
exercise as in Part A. Subsequently, they performed three 10 km
time trials on an electrically braked cycle ergometer (Racer
Mate, Seattle, Washington). Other than the instruction to
finish as rapidly as possible, no instructions were provided,
although the subject knew their maximal power output from
the preliminary test and had access to distance, velocity, power
output and HR, just as they would during competition. Blood
lactate concentration was measured in fingertip capillary blood
Table 1 Characteristics (mean (SD)) of the subjects
Series Gender Age (years) Height (cm) Mass (kg) VO
2max
(l/min)
A Male 26.8 (3.8) 187 (8) 83.3 (3.3) 4.77 (0.26)
Female 21.3 (0.5) 159 (2) 52.3 (1.71) 2.15 (0.29)
B Male 23.5 (4.1) 180 (11) 79.5 (4.4) 4.00 (0.54)
Female 21.8 (2.0) 162 (5) 62.3 (6.8) 2.40 (0.40)
C Male 24.6 (3.8) 183 (5) 82.5 (3.6) 4.08 (0.60)
Female 23.9 (3.2) 168 (3) 54.0 (2.4) 2.54 (0.34)
D Male 39.2 (10.7) 179 (6) 81.1 (5.0) 4.30 (0.68)
Female 35.0 (11.3) 167 (11) 76.2 (21.2) 3.34 (0.75)
Figure 1 Changes in performance time, normalised to the first
performance in the four series of experiments. In Part C, only the first
two rowing time trials were included, as there was an intervening period
of training between trials 2 and 3.
Figure 2 Serial pattern of power output (top) and RPE (bottom) during
the six trails of Part A. Note the progressively higher power output during
the first 600 m of the ride during the successive trails and the
progressively higher RPE at the same point in the ride during successive
trials.
Original article
766 Br J Sports Med 2009;43:765–769. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054841
group.bmj.com on June 1, 2013 - Published by bjsm.bmj.comDownloaded from
(YSI Sport, Yellow Springs, Ohio) before the beginning of the
time trial (after the warm-up) and at the completion of each
2 km of the time trial. Other data were averaged for every 1 km
of the ride (eg, 10% of the total distance).
Statistical analyses were performed for all studies using
repeated-measures ANOVA. Post-hoc analyses were performed
when indicated by ANOVA using the Tukey procedure.
Statistical significance was accepted when p,0.05.
RESULTS
In Part A, the six 3000 m cycle trials were completed in 337 (SD
63), 321 (61). 317 (63), 310 (58), 306 (57) and 303 (56) s,
respectively. Except for T5 vs T6, each trial was significantly
faster than the preceding one. Together with the time results of
the other parts of the study, performance time normalised to
the first performance is presented in fig 1. The sequential
pattern of total power output and RPE in Part A is presented in
fig 2. There was a significant trials6distance interaction for
power output. This was characterised by a progressively greater
power output during the first half of successive trials, with non-
significant differences during the last half of each trial. During
the first 1 km, there was a perfect sequential pattern with each
subsequent trial having a higher power output than during the
preceding trial. In concert with this, there were no significant
differences in total power output during the last 300 m of any
trial. There was a significant distance6trials interaction for RPE.
Although less clear than for power output, the differences can
be characterised as a lower RPE during the beginning and middle
parts of the early trials, with small but still statistically
significant differences in the terminal RPE (8.4 (0.4), 8.6 (0.5),
8.8 (0.6), 8.8 (0.9), 9.1 (0.6) and 9.3 (0.6), respectively).
In Part B, the three 2 km rowing trials were completed in 583
(84), 543 (68) and 532 (68) s, respectively. Each sequential
performance was significantly faster than the preceding one.
The sequential pattern of power output per 200 m is presented
in fig 3 and was characterised by a higher power output in the
first half of successive trials, with minimal differences during
the last portion of the trial. The RPE at the conclusion of
successive trials was 5.8 (1.3), 6.8 (1.6) and 6.9 (1.4),
respectively, with the terminal RPE of T1 significantly less
than of T2 and T3.
In Part C, the four 2 km rowing ergometer trials were
completed in 606 (144), 583 (118), 546 (88) and 540 (83) s,
respectively. The time difference between all trials except T3
and T4 was significant. The pattern of power output integrated
every 200 m over successive trials is presented in fig 4 and was
characterised by progressively higher power output during the
early part of successive trials. The RPE at the conclusion of
successive trials was 6.0 (1.2), 6.6 (1.7), 7.5 (1.4) and 7.7 (1.3),
respectively, with the RPE in T1 significantly less than T2, and
T1 and T2 significantly less than T3 and T4. There was a
significant effect across the training period, but with minimal
differences in pacing strategy between T3 and T4.
In Part D, the three 10 km cycle time trials were completed in
1059 (96), 1022 (89) and 1006 (84) s, respectively. Each trial was
significant faster than the preceding one. The pattern of power
output, HR, RPE and blood lactate is presented in fig 5 and is
characterised by a higher power output earlier in sucessive trials,
with no differences in terminal power output. From the
midpoint of T1 until the finish, the RPE was lower than in
T2 and T3. The terminal RPE was lower in T1 (8.5 (1.4)) than in
T2 (9.3 (0.8)) and T3 (9.7 (0.7)).
DISCUSSION
The main finding of this study is the similarity of pattern of
acquiring a consistent pacing pattern in four groups of well-
trained non-athletes, using two different ergometric modes. In
the early trials, the initial power output was reduced during the
first portion of the trial, with the power output during the
terminal portions of the trial being remarkably consistent.
Subsequent trials were marked by a progressively more
aggressive early pace, with evidence that an essentially stable
performance template was achieved by the third or fourth trial.
The pattern of power output during all studies normalised to
the mean power output evolved from a low early power and
high power output in the terminal portion of the time trials, in
the combined results of the first trial, to a higher power during
the early portion with more moderate terminal power output
(fig 6). While not identical to the very high early power output
pattern observed in high level competitive cyclists and speed
skaters
2–4
during events of comparable duration, it was clear that
the pattern was evolving in that direction.
Supporting the observation of reductions in power output
during beginning portions of the first trials was evidence that
the RPE increased more slowly during the first part of the first
Figure 3 Serial pattern of power output during the three rowing time
trials in Part B. Note the higher power output during the early portion of
the trial during successive trials, with comparatively small differencesin
power output during the terminal portion of the trial.
Figure 4 Serial pattern of power output during the four rowing time
trails in Part C. Note the higher early power output in successive trails
with minimal differences in power output during the terminal portion of
the trail.
Original article
Br J Sports Med 2009;43:765–769. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054841 767
group.bmj.com on June 1, 2013 - Published by bjsm.bmj.comDownloaded from
time trials and that the RPE at the end of the time trials was
systematically lower. This trend was further reflected by the
pattern of blood lactate accumulation in Part D. Collectively, it
can be argued that the subjects were ‘‘holding back’’ during the
early trials, and then progressively increased their effort as they
became convinced that the time trial could be completed with a
particular strategy without negative consequences. This is not
unlike the slower speed of completion, designed to reduce errors,
typically observed in motor learning tasks.
21
Although the subjects were well trained generally, there was
no evidence of any training effect during cycling (peak power
output in part A was 281 (108) W before T1 and 288 (116) W
after T6), and there was a significant improvement in
performance across a period of training during the rowing
ergometer study (Part C). However, this was reasonably
attributable to the effects of practice on this specific ergometric
mode and seemed to be associated with the same trend toward a
modified pacing strategy (eg, higher early power output) in
successive trials.
In summary, the data from the current series of four studies
suggest that there is a learning effect during the performance of
successive high-intensity time trials. Although the largest effect
is during the first three trials, even after several trials these well-
trained subjects do not achieve the pattern of power output
typically displayed by athletes. This suggests that the pre-
exercise template that is a central feature of the ‘‘anticipatory
feedback-RPE model’’ is a non-constant feature and may require
some time to fully develop. In this regard, it would be of interest
to observe the way in which athletes spontaneously improve
their performance, and to determine whether performance
improvements are more attributable to increases in total power
output or to better optimisation of the pattern of power
distribution.
Figure 5 Serial pattern of power output, heart rate, REP and blood lactate concentration in Part D. Note the progressively higher values, particularly of
power output and blood lactate concentration during the early portion of the ride during successive trails.
Figure 6 Serial pattern of power output, normalised to the mean power
output of the entire time trial in the first and last trials of all studies
combined, in comparison with the pattern of power output in athletes
studied in our laboratory.
2–4
What this study adds
The pattern of developing the performance template appears to
follow a predictable pattern during several repetitions of time trial
exercise, characterised by a higher rate of energy expenditure
earlier in the event.
What is known on this topic
The pattern of energy expenditure during time trail exercise
appears to follow a predetermined template, which is modified by
a variety of sensory feedback mechanisms.
Original article
768 Br J Sports Med 2009;43:765–769. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054841
group.bmj.com on June 1, 2013 - Published by bjsm.bmj.comDownloaded from
Funding: KJH and KP were recipients of Dean’s Summer Research Fellowships at the
University of Wisconsin-La Crosse. BR received a research grant from the Graduate
Council of the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.
Competing interests: None.
Ethics approval: Ethics approval was provided by University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.
Patient consent: Obtained.
REFERENCES
1. Noakes TD. The anticipatory regulation of performance: The physiological basis for
pacing strategies and the development of the perception-based model for exercise
performance. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:392–400.
2. Foster C, deKoning JJ, Hettinga F, et al. Pattern of energy expenditure during
simulated competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:826–31.
3. Foster C, deKoning JJ, Hettinga F, et al. Effect of competitive distance on energy
expenditure during simulated competition. Int J Sports Med 2004;25:198–204.
4. deKoning JJ, Foster C, Lampen J, et al. Experimental evaluation of the power
balance model of speed skating. J Appl Physiol 2005;98:227–33.
5. Joseph T, Johnson B, Battista RA, et al. Perception of fatigue during simulated
competition. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:381–6.
6. Tucker R, Kayser B, Rae E, et al. Hyperoxia improves 20 km cycling time trial
performance by increasing muscle activitation levels while perceived exertion stays
the same. Eur J Appl Physiol 2007;101:771–81.
7. Ansley L, Robson PJ, St Clair Gibson A, et al. Anticipatory pacing strategies during
supramaximal exercise lasting longer than 30 s. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:309–14.
8. Bishop D, Bonnet D, Dawson B. The influence of pacing strategy on VO
2
and
supramaximal kayak performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:1041–7.
9. Peltonen JE, Rantamaki J, Nittyaraki SPT, et al. Effects of oxygen frraction in
inspired air on rowing performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985;27:573–9.
10. Rauch HG, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV, et al. A signaling role for muscle
glycogen in the regulation of pace during prolonged exercise. Br J Sports Med
2005;39:34–8.
11. Hulleman M, deKoning JJ, Hettinga FJ, et al. The effect of extrinsic motivation on
cycle time trial performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:709–15.
12. Hettinga FJ, deKoning JJ, Broersen FT, et al. Pacing strategy and the
occurrence of fatigue in 4000 m cycling time trials. Med Sci Sports Exerc
2006;38:1484–91.
13. Hettinga FJ, deKoning JJ, Meijer E, et al. The effect of pacing strategy on energy
expenditure duringa 1500-m cycling time trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:2212–18.
14. Mendez-Villanueve A, Hamer P, Bishop D. Fatigue in repeated sprint exercise is
related to muscle power factors and reduced neuromuscular activity. Eur J Appl
Physiol 2008;103:411–19.
15. Ulmer HV. Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during
heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experentia
1996;52:416–20.
16. St Clair Gibson A, Schabort EJ, Noakes TD. Reduced neuromuscular activity and
force generation during prolonged cycling. Am J Physiol 2001;281:187–196R.
17. Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV. From catastrophe to complexity: a novel
model of integrative central neural regularion of effort and fatigue during exercise in
humans. Br J Sports Med 2005;39:120–4.
18. Lambert EV, St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD. Complex systems model of fatigue:
integrative homeostatic control of peripheral physiological systems during exercise in
humans. Br J Sports Med 2005;39:52–62.
19. Foster C, Cotter HM. Blood lactate, respiratory and heart rate markers on the
capacity for sustained exercise. In: Maud PJ, Foster C, eds. Physiological assessment
of human fitness, 2nd edn. Champaign: Human Kinetics Press, 2005:63–76.
20. Borg G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 1998
21. Dewey RA. Psychology: an introduction. Scarborough: Wadsworth, 2004.
22. Hettinga FJ, de Koning JJ, Foster C. VO
2
response in supra-maximal cycling time
trial exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:230–6.
Original article
Br J Sports Med 2009;43:765–769. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.054841 769
group.bmj.com on June 1, 2013 - Published by bjsm.bmj.comDownloaded from
doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.054841
5, 2009 2009 43: 765-769 originally published online JanuaryBr J Sports Med
C Foster, K J Hendrickson, K Peyer, et al.
template
Pattern of developing the performance
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/10/765.full.html
Updated information and services can be found at:
These include:
References
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/10/765.full.html#related-urls
Article cited in:
http://bjsm.bmj.com/content/43/10/765.full.html#ref-list-1
This article cites 19 articles, 5 of which can be accessed free at:
service
Email alerting the box at the top right corner of the online article.
Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in
Collections
Topic
(155 articles)Editor's choice
Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections
Notes
http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
To request permissions go to:
http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintform
To order reprints go to:
http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/
To subscribe to BMJ go to:
group.bmj.com on June 1, 2013 - Published by bjsm.bmj.comDownloaded from