ArticlePDF Available

The Designer's Situation Awareness Toolkit: Support for User-Centered Design

Authors:
  • SA Technologies

Abstract and Figures

Designing systems to support SA involves three phases: an analysis of SA requirements, the application of SA-oriented design principles, and the measurement of SA during design evaluation. The Designer's Situation Awareness Toolkit (DeSAT) provides support to the designer for each phase of this process through both tutorials and application specific tools. The tutorials cover the Goal Directed Task Analysis (GDTA) methodology for delineating SA requirements, SA oriented design principles, and the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) methodology. The application specific tools include a tool for documenting GDTAs, a Checklist tool to assist designers in evaluating how well a design concept has met the relevant SA requirements, a Design Guidance application, and a tool for creating and administering SAGAT queries (Super SAGAT). Through these tools, DeSAT provides a comprehensive approach for improving the designer's ability to create designs based on sound SA oriented design principles.
Content may be subject to copyright.
THE DESIGNER’S SITUATION AWARENESS TOOLKIT:
SUPPORT FOR USER-CENTERED DESIGN
Debra G. Jones, Mica R. Endsley, Mark Bolstad
SA Technologies, Inc.
Marietta, GA
Gil Estes
BGE Software
Marietta, GA
Designing systems to support SA involves three phases: an analysis of SA requirements,
the application of SA-oriented design principles, and the measurement of SA during
design evaluation. The Designer’s Situation Awareness Toolkit (DeSAT) provides
support to the designer for each phase of this process through both tutorials and
application specific tools. The tutorials cover the Goal Directed Task Analysis (GDTA)
methodology for delineating SA requirements, SA oriented design principles, and the
Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) methodology. The
application specific tools include a tool for documenting GDTAs, a Checklist tool to
assist designers in evaluating how well a design concept has met the relevant SA
requirements, a Design Guidance application, and a tool for creating and administering
SAGAT queries (Super SAGAT). Through these tools, DeSAT provides a
comprehensive approach for improving the designer’s ability to create designs based on
sound SA oriented design principles.
INTRODUCTION
The key to enabling users to cope with the
plethora of data characteristic of today’s
“information age” is to design systems that support
the user in building and maintaining a high level of
situation awareness (SA). Current technologies
often do not support operators as they seek to
develop SA; consequently operations are left
vulnerable to error. Problems with SA have been
found to be a major contributor to incidents and
accidents. For example, problems with SA were
found to be the leading causal factor in a review of
military aviation mishaps (Hartel, Smith, & Prince,
1991). In another study of accidents among major
air carriers, 88% of those involving human error
could be attributed to problems with situation
awareness (Endsley, 1995b). A similar review of
errors in other domains (such as air traffic control or
nuclear power) shows that this problem is not
limited to aviation, but is faced by complex systems
in a variety of domains.
Successfully enhancing SA through system
design requires that designers understand how to
combine and present the vast amounts of data
available in order to support the user’s ability to
develop SA. As true SA only exists in the mind of
the human operator, presenting large amounts of
data will do no good unless it is successfully
transmitted, absorbed and assimilated in a timely
manner by the person to form situation awareness.
One of the key benefits of looking at situation
awareness is that it tells the designer how all the
available data needs to be combined in order to
facilitate user understanding. Instead of loading the
user down with 100 pieces of miscellaneous data
provided in haphazard fashion, situation awareness
requirements provide guidance as to what the user’s
real comprehension and projection needs are. By
evaluating the SA requirements, system designers
can determine the best approach for bringing those
100 pieces of data together to form meaningful
information and to create groupings of data that can
be easily absorbed and assimilated in time critical
situations.
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48th ANNUAL MEETING—2004 653
In the past, the responsibility for correctly
integrating all the relevant information fell on the
user. This task left them overloaded and susceptible
to missing critical factors. Thus, providing systems
that support the SA process is essential meeting a
critical challenge in today’s complex environments.
Meeting this challenge requires a structured
approach that incorporates SA considerations into
the design process, including determining SA
requirements, designing for SA enhancement, and
measuring SA in design evaluation. The Designer’s
Situation Awareness Toolkit (DeSAT) was created
to support designers in effectively addressing these
three aspects of the design cycle. Figure 1 shows
how DeSAT will support each phase of the SA-
oriented design process to provide significant aid to
the designer within the system design process. Each
of the three major subcomponents of DeSAT will be
discussed separately, although they are all
functionally linked and support each other.
Requirements
Analysis
Technology
Analysis
Human Factors
Design Guidelines
& Standards
Design
Concepts
Final
Design
Evaluation
DeSA T
DeSA T
DeSA T
Figure 1: DeSAT and the system design process
SA Requirements Analysis. As a first step,
DeSAT guides the designer through the
identification of situation awareness requirements
for the application being considered. In order to
create effective designs, the designer must
understand what information (as opposed to data!)
the individual operators need as well as what
information their teammates need for a particular
mission. An awareness of the operator’s own state
as well as the state of their teammates, the systems,
and the current operational situation all contribute to
the operator’s overall SA.
SA Design Guidelines. Most significantly,
however, DeSAT does not simply provide a tool for
documenting these SA requirements, but provides a
significant advantage in tying these requirements to
the design process. Today’s designers find a
significant gap between the requirements analyses
they create and the translation of those requirements
into design realities. DeSAT’s role is to help bridge
this gap. The development of a system design for
successfully providing the multitude of SA
requirements that exist in complex systems is a
significant challenge. DeSAT features design
guidance to assist designers through this process.
SA Measurement. Finally there are many
concepts and technologies that are currently being
developed and touted as enhancing SA. Prototyping
and simulation of new technologies, new displays
and new automation concepts are extremely
important for evaluating the actual effects of
proposed concepts within the context of the task
domain. The Situation Awareness Global
Assessment Technique (SAGAT) has been
successfully used to provide this information by
directly and objectively measuring operator SA in
evaluating avionics concepts, display designs, and
interface technologies (Endsley, 1995a). The
SAGAT portion of DeSAT, called SuperSAGAT,
supports designers in systematically evaluating their
design concepts. SuperSAGAT allows designers to
easily customize SAGAT queries for their particular
domain, based on the SA requirements analysis for
that domain.
SA REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS
The SA requirements analysis component of
DeSAT consist of a tutorial describing how to
delineate SA requirements, a tool to help document
these requirements, and a tool for assessing if all of
the SA requirements have been incorporated into the
design.
GDTA Tutorial
The Goal Directed Task Analysis (GDTA)
addresses the need for delineating user SA
requirements as part of the design process. The
GDTA is a form of cognitive task analysis that
delineates the user’s goals, relevant decisions, and
associated SA requirements for a particular domain.
This tutorial walks the user through why a GDTA is
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48th ANNUAL MEETING—2004 654
needed, how to construct a GDTA, and what
techniques will help ensure successful data
collection and organization. Basic principles and
techniques are described and examples provided
regarding the use of the technique to ascertain SA
requirements from subject matter experts (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Screenshots from the GDTA Tutorial
GDTA Tool
Using the Goal Directed Task Analysis
approach provides a consistent way to document the
full range of SA requirements as they relate to
specific decisions and goals in a particular domain.
Using a standard format for documenting these
elements facilitates the knowledge elicitation during
interviews with subject matter experts and supports
communication of these requirements between
designers during concept development. This tool
was designed specifically for documenting GDTAs
and supports the designer in quickly creating graphic
representations of the GDTA (Figure 3).
Figure 3: GDTA Tool
GDTA Checklist Tool
The GDTA checklist tool assists designers in
evaluating a concept to ensure that the design meets
all the users’ SA requirements (Figure 4). Drawing
from a GDTA previously entered in the database via
the GDTA tool, this tool presents the user with a list
of goals from which the user can select one or more
goals to evaluate. Once a goal or set of goals has
been selected for analysis, the tool presents the user
with the associated decisions and SA requirements.
The user can then use this list as a checklist to
determine if any SA requirements have not been
accounted for in the design concept. After the user
has worked through the checklist, the tool provides a
summary of what SA requirements have been
omitted relative to each goal.
Figure 4: GDTA Checklist Tool
SA DESIGN GUIDELINES
The SA Design Guidelines portion of DeSAT
includes a tutorial and a guidelines application tool.
Both tools are designed to support designers in
applying SA oriented design principles to the design
process.
SA Oriented Design Tutorial
The SA Oriented Design tutorial delineates 50
design principles relevant to designing systems to
support SA. This tutorial provides basic background
information and a detailed explanation of the
relevant design principles for users who may have
little or no background in this area (Figure 5). It is
divided into 3 modules for ease of use. The first
module covers general SA oriented design issues
and issues related to managing uncertainty. The
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48th ANNUAL MEETING—2004 655
second module covers issues related to complexity
and alarms. The third module covers issues related
to automation and supporting SA in team operations.
Figure 5: Screenshots from the Design Guidelines
Tutorial
Design Guidelines Tool
The Design Guidelines tool provides the
designer with SA Oriented Design guidance (Figure
6). Based on existing theories of SA, available
empirical evidence, and existing guidelines in the
fields of human-computer interaction and human
factors, a taxonomy was created describing issues
relevant to designing systems to support SA. This
taxonomy provided the structure for further
developing design guidance for supporting designers
in creating systems that effectively support SA.
Using the taxonomy as an organizing feature, this
tool allows users to quickly select a topic and view
relevant questions, design guidance, design issues,
testing issues, examples, and the references from
which the guidance was aggregated. Topics include
general SA principles, as well as guidelines for
designing to support SA through visual displays,
auditory displays, alarms and alerts, controls,
automation, team operations, managing uncertainty,
and managing complexity.
Figure 6: Design Guidelines Tool
SA MEASUREMENT
The SA measurement part of DeSAT includes
two tools. The first is a tutorial describing the
SAGAT methodology. The second is
SuperSAGAT, an easy to use tool for creating and
administering SAGAT queries.
SAGAT Tutorial
The Situation Awareness Global Assessment
Technique (SAGAT) tutorial presents a technique
for objectively assessing user SA (Figure 7). This
tutorial describes the basic principles behind
SAGAT and how to administer SAGAT to
participants during an experiment. Further, it
explains how to analyze SAGAT data to obtain an
evaluation of user’s SA, both at a high level and
with respect to individual aspects of the system.
Figure 7: Screenshots from the SAGAT Tutorial
SuperSAGAT
The ability to effectively measure the impact of
a design on user’s SA is an essential element of SA-
Oriented Design. One proven approach to
objectively measuring SA is the Situation
Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT)
(Endsley, 1995a). SAGAT provides an unbiased
assessment of a person’s SA by directly querying
them regarding their current knowledge of the
various elements in an environment and comparing
their responses to the actual state of the
environment. The SAGAT methodology involves
freezing a man-in-the-loop simulation at random
points in time, removing information from the
participant’s display, and administering a battery of
queries to the participant. These queries are
developed based on a thorough analysis of the
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48th ANNUAL MEETING—2004 656
participant’s SA requirements. Although these
queries can be administered via pencil-paper,
collecting the data on a computer reduces the time
and effort required to analyze the data. The
drawback to computerized data collection is that
creating a program to run the queries can be time
consuming and difficult.
To ease this difficulty, SuperSAGAT was
developed to allow the user to quickly and easily
create and administer SAGAT queries. The data
collected with this computer based tool is stored in a
file that can easily be retrieved and formatted for
statistical analysis. This program has three
components: SAGAT Designer (Figure 8), SAGAT
Compiler (Figure 9), and SAGAT FileAdapter.
SAGAT Designer allows users to create a series of
SAGAT queries; SAGAT Compiler administers the
queries to the participant; and SAGAT FileAdapter
assists the user in linking image files to the program
when the program has been transferred from one
operating system to another.
Figure 8: Screenshot from SAGATDesigner
Figure 9: SAGATCompiler
SUMMARY
The Designer’s Situation Awareness Toolkit
provides a unique set of tools to assist designers in
creating systems that effectively support the user’s
ability to build and maintain an adequate level of
SA. DeSAT provides support to the designer for
each phase of the SA oriented design process
through both tutorials and application specific tools
(Figure 10). Further, by stocking the GDTA tool
and SuperSAGAT with existing versions for select
domains, the designer is provided with a foundation
that can be adapted as needed for other domains. By
supporting the designer during each phase of the SA
Oriented Design process, DeSAT provides a unique
tool for developing human centered systems by
providing a comprehensive approach for improving
the designer’s ability to create designs based on
sound SA oriented design principles.
Figure 10: DeSAT and the SA Oriented Design
Approach
REFERENCES
Endsley, M. R. (1995a). Measurement of Situation
Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human
Factors, 37(1), 65-84.
Endsley, M. R. (1995b). Toward a theory of
situation awareness in dynamic systems.
Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
Hartel, C. E., Smith, K., & Prince, C. (1991).
Defining aircrew coordination: Searching
mishaps for meaning, Sixth International
Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus,
OH.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by NASA Langley
Research Center (#NAS1-02069).
¾ GDTA Tutorial
¾ GDTA Tool
¾ GDTA Checklist Tool
¾ SA Oriented Design
Tutorial
¾ Design Guidelines Tool
SA Requirements
Analysis
SA-Oriented Design
SA Measurement ¾ SAGAT Tutorial
¾ SuperSAGAT
PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48th ANNUAL MEETING—2004 657
... This method focuses on the basic goals of the operator, major decisions that need to be made to accomplish these goals and the situation awareness requirements that are mandatory for decision-making (D. G. Jones et al. 2012). This method is suitable for exploring what operators ideally want to know, regardless of whether this information is already available (Endsley et al. 2003). ...
... The goal-directed task analysis is a technology-independent method that focuses on identifying the important goals, decisions, and situation awareness requirements of operators (D. G. Jones et al. 2012). A goal-directed task analysis can be used to determine what operators would ideally like to know to meet their goals, even if that information is not available with their currently used technology (Endsley et al. 2003). ...
... Therefore, the situation awareness requirements of the goaldirected task analysis can be used to explore possibilities of improving the presentation of information with any kind of technology (D. G. Jones et al. 2012). Based on previous literature, we identified augmented reality as a promising technology that might improve situation awareness in emergency control rooms (Brunetti et al. 2015;Luchetti et al. 2017;Nunes et al. 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
During crisis situations, emergency operators require fast information access to achieve situation awareness and make the best possible decisions. Augmented reality could be used to visualize the wealth of user-generated content available on social media and enable context-adaptive functions for emergency operators. Although emergency operators agree that social media analytics will be important for their future work, it poses a challenge to filter and visualize large amounts of social media data. We conducted a goal-directed task analysis to identify the situation awareness requirements of emergency operators. By collecting tweets during two storms in Germany we evaluated the usefulness of Twitter data for achieving situation awareness and conducted interviews with emergency operators to derive filter strategies for social media data. We synthesized the results by discussing how the unique interface of augmented reality can be used to integrate social media data into emergency control rooms for situation awareness support.
... They future write that participatory design strives for reciprocal learning opportunities and strives to imagine alternative realities. These techniques discussed in this article adhere to these principles and have been sourced from co-design and human-centered design toolkits (Jones et al., 2004;Sanders et al., 2010). ...
Article
Full-text available
Changing factors in the higher education context such as expansion and increased marketization have sparked interest in how universities can co-create and partner with students. However, while numerous articles discuss the importance or benefits of collaboration between students and staff, less attention has been placed on the explicit approaches to support partnership. This paper will outline an approach and discuss the benefits of integrating co-design into university service practice. Using a student-staff design thinking workshop model called ‘CoLabs', we will outline how co-creation with students can help university staff generate new ideas and solve ongoing issues. Activities to assist co-design with students, including storyboarding, are also summarized as well as authentic case studies of where co-design practices have helped drive change. The aim of this work is to provide the sector with an example of usable techniques to support co-design practices with students and reinforce the benefits of implementation of co-design in higher education.
... Situation awareness was measured twice with the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) questionnaire during the eye-tracking sequence (S2 Appendix). The 38-question SAGAT was achieved by an expert medical committee following the Goal Directed Task Analysis [21]. The numerical responses were accurate within a 10% range around the true value. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality in the world. Human factors and especially situation awareness has primarily responsibility to explain suboptimal cares. Based on eye tracking and behavior analysis in high fidelity simulation of PPH management, the goal of this study is to identify perceptual and cognitive key parameters of the expertise. Methods: Two groups of fifteen anesthetists (residents and experienced anesthetists) watched the beginning of a severe simulated PPH management. During this first experimental phase, situation awareness was assessed using SAGAT (Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique) questionnaire and visual behavior was analyzed with eye tracking. In the continuity of the video sequence, they have to step in the PPH situation and to provide care to the simulated patient. Performance of cares was evaluated and self-assessed as well as cognitive load. Results: No statistical difference between the residents and experienced anesthetists was observed on performance of simulated PPH management. The mean expected practice score was 76.9 ± 13.9%). Assessment of situation awareness (65 ± 7%), cognitive load (74.4 ± 11.3%) and theoretical knowledge of PPH (52.4 ± 3.5%) were also not statistically different between the two groups. Only results of self-assessed performance (respectively 66.1 ± 16.6 and 47.0 ± 20.8 for experts and residents) and eye-tracking data revealed that experts tended to get accurate evaluation of their performance and to monitor more the blood loss of the patient. Experts have in average 8.28% more fixating points than Novices and gazed the blood loss region longer (865 ms ± 439 vs. 717 ms ± 362). Conclusions: This study pointed out the limits of classical assessment of performance, and human factors based on questionnaires to identify expertise in simulated PPH care. A neuroscientific approach with new technology like eye tracking could provide new objective and more sensitive insights on human factors in simulated medical emergency situations.
... In small unit tactical levels a modified version of SAGAT called TSAT was used which follows the principles of cognitive engineering and human factors [24]. A SA toolkit called DeSAT has been devised which provides support for user-centered design by providing a simplistic way of SA requirement analysis, design process and evaluation [25]. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
The number of sensors available for civilian and military operations has grown tremendously over the last decades. With the growth of available sensor technologies, the complexity with which these sensors operate to provide environmental and system data has also multiplied. Retrieving and presenting this data in a format that is easily readable or understandable by the users is essential to the effectiveness of utilizing these sensors. This data has to be presented to the users in a way that matches their cognitive levels, provides acceptable levels of automation and does not cause sensory overloads. Presentation of data in such a format requires active involvement of users from the very beginning of the system development. The system also needs to be tested for situational awareness and workload levels. This paper is focused towards the participatory design methodology in making an active and rational UI for a Crew Assistance System based on the NATO Generic Vehicle Architecture standard. The Crew Assistance System is assessed for situational awareness and workload levels using the SAGAT (Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique) and NASA TLX (Task Load Index) technique. The system design also introduces an adaptable Rule-Based method for providing feedback in the Crew Assistance System and new concepts of feedback mechanisms for the NGVA standard. The system is mainly targeted towards crew members of military vehicles. It aims at improving tactical Command and Control systems by raising alarms at specific events and making intelligent future predictions allowing them to react quickly and correctly when having to make critical decisions.
Article
This chapter describes how Situational Awareness (SA) can differ between roles in the design-use process. SA is not traditionally used to describe awareness between roles in the design-use process. However, SA between individuals or groups having various roles in the design-use process could be described, assessed, and used as a tool for improving a design process.
Article
The purpose of this chapter is to describe important aspects of how to manage human factors in the development of fighter aircraft, by presenting prominent features of the domain, corresponding design concepts to cope with what is special, and guidance in the approach to managing human factors in the development of fighter aircraft. The chapter includes a description of the domain of fighter aircraft development, followed by a section on how to design for what is special about a fighter pilot, a fighter aircraft, and the flight environment. Examples of design concepts from the domain, such as HOTAS and Basic-T are discussed in light of domain specific demands. Later, human factor considerations, such as evaluation of human factors and usable systems, are discussed together with how to manage human factors in development.
Article
Human factors/ergonomics professionals regularly study the situation awareness (SA) problems of pilots, air traffic controllers, automobile drivers, power plant workers, ambulance dispatchers, urban search and rescue professionals, and unmanned vehicle operators, to mention a few. The challenge has been to define SA operationally and devise measurement strategies that focus on attention and recall on the one hand and relevant actions on the other. Although there have been many successes, challenges remain. This review is organized in three parts. Under “What?” we discuss definitions of SA, their interpretations in terms of human information processing and ecological psychological theories, as well as techniques for measuring SA. Under “So what?” we introduce SA applications'information requirements, technological tools, and training systems'that support the way people work and live. Finally, under “Now what?” we discuss future directions for SA research.
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents a theoretical model of situation awareness based on its role in dynamic human decision making in a variety of domains. Situation awareness is presented as a predominant concern in system operation, based on a descriptive view of decision making. The relationship between situation awareness and numerous individual and environmental factors is explored. Among these factors, attention and working memory are presented as critical factors limiting operators from acquiring and interpreting information from the environment to form situation awareness, and mental models and goal-directed behavior are hypothesized as important mechanisms for overcoming these limits. The impact of design features, workload, stress, system complexity, and automation on operator situation awareness is addressed, and a taxonomy of errors in situation awareness is introduced, based on the model presented. The model is used to generate design implications for enhancing operator situation awareness and future directions for situation awareness research.
Article
Full-text available
Methodologies for the empirical measurement of situation awareness are reviewed, including a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of each method and the potential limitations of the measures from a theoretical and practical viewpoint. Two studies are presented that investigate questions of validity and intrusiveness regarding a query-based technique. This technique requires that a simulation of the operational tasks be momentarily interrupted in order to query operators on their situation awareness. The results of the two studies indicate that the query technique is not intrusive on normal subject behavior during the trial and does not suffer from limitations of human memory, which provides an indication of empirical validity. The results of other validity studies regarding the technique are discussed along with recommendations for its use in measuring situation awareness in varied settings.
Defining aircrew coordination: Searching mishaps for meaning
  • C E Hartel
  • K Smith
  • C Prince
Hartel, C. E., Smith, K., & Prince, C. (1991). Defining aircrew coordination: Searching mishaps for meaning, Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH.