ArticlePDF Available

Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. leucaena

Authors:
leucaena--1
FabaceaeCPea family
Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit.
leucaena
C. D. Whitesell and John A. Parrotta
Dr. Whitesell retired from the USDA Forest Service; Dr. Parrotta is a research forester at the
USDA Forest Service=s International Institute of Tropical Forestry, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico.
Other common names. leadtree, zarcilla, popinac, koa haole.
Synonyms. Leucaena glauca (L.) Benth., L. blancii Goyena, L. glabrata Rose, L. greggii
Watson, L. latisiliqua (L.) W.T. Gillis, L. salvadorensis Standl.
Growth habit, occurrence, and use. The genus Leucaena includes about 50 species of trees
and shrubs that are native to Central America and southeast Asia. Leaves, legumes (pods), and young
seeds of at least 4 Leucaena species have been used by humans for food since the time of the Mayans
(Brewbaker and others 1970). LeucaenaCLeucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit.Cthe most
widespread member of the genus, originated in Mexico and Central America (Brewbaker and others
1972) but is now considered pantropical. It is found throughout the West Indies from the Bahamas
and Cuba to Trinidad and Tobago and has become naturalized in southern Texas and southern
Florida; it also has been planted in California (Little and Wadsworth 1964). The species was
introduced to Puerto Rico and the Pacific Islands during the Spanish colonial era. It was introduced
to Hawaii about 1864. It invades cleared areas and forms dense thickets, either as a shrub or small
tree up to 10 m in height (Takahashi and Ripperton 1949). This species is evergreen when moisture
is not a limiting factor. Strains of leucaena can be categorized as one of two types: the Acommon@ (or
AHawaiian@) and the Agiant@ (or ASalvadorian@) (Brewbaker and others 1972). The common type,
representing the strains most commonly naturalized outside of the species= native range, is a
drought-tolerant, branchy, abundantly flowering, and aggressive shrub or small tree. The
Salvadorian type is an erect tree that attains heights up to 20 m (Brewbaker and others 1972; NAS
1984). In many parts of the world, the species is considered a weed.
Leucaena is used for a variety of purposes, including timber, fuelwood, forage, and organic
fertilizer. It is planted as a shade tree for coffee, cacao, and other cash crops; for soil fertility
improvement; erosion control; and site preparation in reforestation (Neal 1965; NAS 1984; Parrotta
1992; Whitesell 1974). The light reddish heartwood is easily worked but is of low to medium
durability. It is used for light construction, boxes, and particleboard. The wood is considered a
promising source of short-fiber pulp for paper production. The protein-rich leaves and legumes are
widely used as fodder for cattle, water buffalo, and goats. The protein content of dry forage ranges
from 14.0 to 16.2% (Oaks and Skov 1967). Depending on variety, the protein consists of 19 to
47% mimosine (Brewbaker and others 1972), an amino acid that can cause weight loss and ill
leucaena--2
health in monogastric animals such as pigs, horses, rabbits, and poultry when leucaena fodder
comprises more than 5 to 10% (by weight) of the diet. Ruminants (cows, buffalo, and goats) in
most parts of the world (except for Australia, Papua New Guinea, and parts of Africa and the
Pacific) have stomach microorganisms that render mimosine harmless.
Flowering and fruiting. Flowering phenology varies widely among varieties and with
location. The common type varieties flower year-round, often beginning as early as 4 to 6 months
after seed germination. The giant varieties flower seasonally, usually twice a year. The spherical,
whitish flower heads are 2.0 to 2.5 cm in diameter and are borne on stalks 2 to 3 cm long at the
ends or sides of twigs (Parrotta 1992). The fruits, generally produced in abundance from the first
year onward, are flat, thin legumes that are dark brown when ripe; they measure 10 to 15 cm long
and 1.5 to 2.0 cm wide. A legume contains 15 to 20 seeds (Parrotta 1992). The seeds are small (8
mm long), flat, teardrop-shaped, shiny, and dark brown with a thin but fairly durable seedcoat. The
seeds are usually released from dehiscent legumes while still on the tree, although unopened or
partially opened legumes may be carried some distance by wind. The legumes are commonly eaten
by and pass through the digestive tracts of livestock, which appear to be important dispersal agents
in pastures.
Collection, extraction, and storage. Legumes may be collected from branches when ripe,
before dehiscence; they should be sun-dried and then threshed to release seeds. Threshing is
commonly done by beating the dried legumes in cloth bags. There are about 17,000 to 24,000 clean
seeds/kg (11,000/lb) (Parrotta 1992). Unscarified seeds will remain viable for more than 1 year
when stored under dry conditions at ambient temperatures and up to 5 years stored at 2 to 6 ºC.
Dried, scarified seeds will remain viable for 6 to 12 months (van den Beldt and others 1985;
Daguma and others 1988; Parrotta 1992).
In Hawaii the larvae of a recently introduced beetleCAraecerus levipennis JordanCcan
destroy the seed. At times, virtually all of the legumes in certain stands are infested (Sherman and
Tamashiro 1956). Seeds should be fumigated as soon as possible after collection to kill the larvae.
Fumigation is accomplished by exposing the seeds to methyl bromide at a concentration of 32 g/m3
(0.032 oz/ft3) for 2 hours at 27 ºC.
Pregermination treatments. Although seeds may be sown without scarification,
mechanical scarification (abrasion with sandpaper or clipping the seedcoat) or either of the following
2 treatments are used to ensure more rapid and uniform germination (Parrotta 1992): (a) immersion
in hot water (80 ºC) for 3 to 4 minutes followed by soaking in water at room tmperature for up to
12 hours or (b) soaking in concentrated sulfuric acid for 15 to 30 minutes. Scarification may be
followed by inoculation with nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium bacteria (mixed with finely ground peat)
after coating the seeds with a gum arabic or concentrated sugar solution. Presowing inoculation of
seeds facilitates good field establishment in soil devoid of effective rhizobia strains.
Germination tests. Germination rates are commonly 50 to 98% for fresh seeds (Daguma
and others 1988; NAS 1984). Scarified seeds germinate 6 to 10 days after sowing; unscarified seeds
germinate 6 to 60 days after sowing (Parrotta 1992). Germination in leucaena is epigeal.
Nursery practice. Leucaena seeds germinate on or near the soil surface and should not be
planted deeper than 2 cm (: in). Nursery media should be well-drained, have good nutrient and
leucaena--3
water-holding capacity, and have a pH between 5.5 and 7.5 (van der Beldt and Brewbaker 1985).
Light shade is recommended during the first few weeks of seeding development, and full sun
thereafter (Parrotta 1992). Taproot development is rapid in young seedlings. Seedlings generally
reach plantable size (height of 20 cm or 8 in) in 2 to 3 months. Plantations may be established by
direct seeding (Francis 1993); by planting container seedlings, bareroot seedlings, stem cuttings (2 to
5 cm in diameter).
Literature Cited
Brewbaker JL, Plucknett DL, Gonzales V. 1972. Varietal trials of Leucaena leucocephala (Akoa
haole@) in Hawaii. Res. Bull. 166. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, College of Agriculture,
Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. 29 p.
Daguma B, Kang BT, Okali DUU. 1988. Factors affecting germination of leucaena (Leucaena
leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. seed. Seed Science and Technology 16(2): 489B500.
Francis JK. 1993. Leucaena leucocephala established by direst seeding in prepared seed spots under
difficult conditions. Nitrogen Fixing Tree Reports 11: 91B93.
Little EL Jr, Wadsworth FH. 1964. Common trees of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Agric.
Handbk. 249. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service. 548 p.
NAS [National Academy of Sciences]. 1984. Leucaena: promising forage and tree crop for the
tropics. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. 100 p.
Neal MC. 1965. In gardens of Hawaii. Special Publ. 50. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press. 924
p.
Oaks AJ, Skov O. 1967. Yield trials of Leucaena in the US Virgin Islands. Journal of Agriculture of
the University of Puerto Rico 51: 176B181.
Parrotta JA. 1992. Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit: leucaena, tantan. Res. Note SO-ITF-
SM-52. New Orleans: USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 8 p.
Sherman M, Tamashiro M. 1956. Biological control of Araecerus levipennis Jordan (Coleoptera:
Anthribidae). Proceedings of the Hawaii Entomological Society 16: 138B148.
Takahashi M, Ripperton JC. 1949. Koa haole (Leucaena glauca): its establishment, culture, and
utilization as a forage crop. Res. Bull. 100. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, College of
Agriculture. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. 56 p.
Van den Beldt RJ, Brewbaker JL, eds. 1985. Leucaena wood production and use. Waimanalo, HI:
Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association. 50 p.
Whitesell CD. 1974. Leucaena leucocephala, leucaena. In: Schopmeyer CS, tech. coord. Seeds of
woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handbk. 450. Washington, DC: USDA Forest
Service: 491B493.
leucaena--4
Figure 1CLeucaena leucocephala, leucaena: seed, × 4.
Figure 2CLeucaena leucocephala, leucaena: longitudinal section through a seed, × 12.
... Thus, proponents down-play the costs, while opponents down-play the benefits. Government agencies have long promoted the use of buffel grass and other invasive forage species including leucaena Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit (Walton 2009), gamba grass (Cameron and Lemcke 2006) and Olive hymenachne (Hall 2000). Foundations for a Broad-Scale ...
... Non-legislative measures could play an important role but would require broad stakeholder consultation during both development and implementation. Non-legislative elements may encourage consensus and/or compromise (Walton 2004) and could include voluntary codes of practice (Walton 2009), insurance mechanisms (Martin 2008) and certification procedures related to off-site impacts. Valid Australian precedents address species that are potential sources of illicit drugs (e.g., poppies in Tasmania (Department of Justice 2010); Indian hemp in New South Wales (Zurbo 2008)), which present many of the same issues as invasive pasture species. ...
... Valid Australian precedents address species that are potential sources of illicit drugs (e.g., poppies in Tasmania (Department of Justice 2010); Indian hemp in New South Wales (Zurbo 2008)), which present many of the same issues as invasive pasture species. The code of practice for leucaena (Walton 2009 ) provides a precedent though there are currently no reliable assessments of its effectiveness. Leucaena and buffel grass are both important, extensively cultivated forage species in northern Australia but a code of practice for buffel would have to be tailored for it (Grice 2006). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduced plants that have both production values and negative impacts can be contentious. Generally they are either treated as weeds and their use prohibited; or unfettered exploitation is permitted and land managers must individually contend with any negative effects. Buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) is contentious in Australia and there has been no attempt to broadly and systematically address the issues surrounding it. However, recent research indicates that there is some mutual acceptance by proponents and opponents of each others' perspectives and we contend that this provides the basis for a national approach. It would require thorough and on-going consultation with stakeholders and development of realistic goals that are applicable across a range of scales and responsive to regional differences in costs, benefits and socio-economic and biophysical circumstances. It would be necessary to clearly allocate responsibilities and ascertain the most appropriate balance between legislative and non-legislative mechanisms. A national approach could involve avoiding the introduction of additional genetic material, countering proliferation in regions where the species is sparse, preventing incursion into conservation reserves where it is absent, containing strategically located populations and managing communities to prevent or reduce dominance by buffel grass. This approach could be applied to other contentious plant species.
... The shrub which is freely available in Ibadan, South-west Nigeria is native to Mexico and Central America (Hill, 1971), but now widely distributed throughout the tropics. Different Uses of Leucaena leucocephala have been reported; it is planted as a shade tree for coffee, cacao and other cash crops; for soil fertility improvement; erosion control; site preparation in reforestation and used for a variety of other purposes including timber and fuel wood (Rushkin, 1984 andWhitesell, 1974). The proteinrich leaves and legumes are widely used as fodder for cattle, water buffalo, and goats (Sethi and Kulkani, 1995). ...
Article
Full-text available
Water, methanolic and ethanolic extracts of both fresh and dried parts (leaf blades, leaf petioles, stems, fruits, seeds and flowers) of Leucaena leucocephala (English name: white lead tree) were tested for their in vitro antinematodal activity against juveniles of Meloidogyne incognita, also phytochemical screening was carried out on these extracts, additionally total phenolics and total flavonoids were estimated in all studied parts of this plant. Results revealed that, all tested extracts possessed nematotoxic effects as they achieved mortality percentage varied between 28.54 to 100%. Water extracts of all tested samples showed 100% mortality except dried samples of both stem (69.00 %) and mature fruit (38.7 %). Methanol extracts of fresh samples of leaf blades, leaf petioles, stems, immature fruits, immature seeds and flowers showed 100% mortality; meanwhile the remaining parts gave only above than 50% mortality. In this regard, ethanol extracts of fresh and dried parts of the plant showed the least antinematodal activity (compared to both water and methanol extracts) except dried samples of both immature fruit (62.30 %) and flower (96.80 %). Preliminary phytochemical screening on all studied extracts of all plant parts revealed the presence of carbohydrates and/or glycosides, tannins, flavonoids, anthraquinones, steroids and/triterpenoids, sublimable substances, saponins, alkaloids and/or nitrogenous bases, cardiac glycosides, coumarins, chlorides, sulphates and iridoids in all samples. In this regard, results of preliminary phytochemical screening on all studied extracts of all plant parts showed that, the richest extracts in these studied phytochemicals are belonging to water extracts of all plant parts, followed by methanolic extracts of all plant parts, meanwhile ethanolic extracts of all plant parts were found to contain the least amounts of phytochemicals under investigation, respectively. Phytochemical content, total phenolics and total flavonoids are positively correlated with antinematodal activity.
... Likewise, soil analysis is also a possible improvement for future research. Our study did not include the analysis of soil characteristics; however, experimenters reported similar kind of soil in both systems with a slightly stonier soil in the ISS, which can promote the presence of shrubs such as those from the genus leucaena (Piedras, 1992). Soil analysis can identify characteristics that can be relatable to other paddock systems in the tropics, thus allowing us to replicate similar results in other areas. ...
Article
Full-text available
Intensive silvopastoral systems (ISS) are a sustainable alternative to monoculture systems (MS). The presence of trees and legumes improves animal welfare due to the increased food quality and quantity and the presence of shade while providing a variety of environmental services. As cattle behaviour is greatly affected by environmental conditions, knowledge on the behavioural trade-offs that cattle make to meet their demands while foraging in different grazing systems is important, as this will help us understand the perceived advantages of ISS. This pilot study assessed the behaviour of heifers in an ISS ( n =8 heifers) and MS ( n =8 heifers) in the Mexican tropics during the dry and rainy seasons, and its relationship with forage availability, mean travelled distance and the temperature humidity index (THI). In both seasons, daily foraging times were longer in the MS than the ISS ( P <0.01). The duration of rumination was higher for ISS ( P <0.01) and the duration of lying was higher for the dry season ( P <0.05). The decrease in foraging times in relation to THI was significantly higher in the ISS than in the MS (mean slope±SE: ISS=−4.64±0.34; MS=−2.34±0.22; t=−14.20, P <0.001). The results suggest that the forage availability and access to shade in the ISS allow cattle to rest longer and increase rumination, whereas cattle in MS spend more time searching for food and foraging at times of the day were the temperatures were higher as a compensatory strategy, which potentially decreases cattle’s welfare and production qualities when compared with the ISS. In conclusion, ISS are likely to generate positive behavioural trade-offs that result in better welfare conditions and higher productive potential.
... The shrub which is freely available in Ibadan, South-west Nigeria is native to Mexico and Central America (Hill, 1971), but now widely distributed throughout the tropics. It is planted as a shade tree for coffee, cacao, and other cash crops; for soil fertility improvement; erosion control; site preparation in reforestation and used for a variety of other purposes including timber and fuel wood (Rushkin, 1984;Whitesell, 1974). The protein-rich leaves and legumes *Address for correspondence: deleodeniyi@gmail.com ...
Article
Full-text available
The seed oil of Leuconia leucocephala was investigated for its antimicrobial activity and the pharmaceutical properties of its lotion formulation determined. The oil was extracted from the pulverised dried seeds of the Leuconia leucocephala plant by cold maceration in n-hexane. The oil was tested against four bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Esherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and four fungi (Aspergilus niger, Rhizopus stolon, Penicillum notatum and Candida albicans) isolates. Gentamycin and tioconazole were the reference drugs respectively. The oil was later formulated as a lotion and the pharmaceutical properties of the formulation determined.The oil was found to have a concentration-dependent activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, while showing no activity against the fungi tested. The lotion formulation of the oil containing oleic acid had good pharmaceutical properties and was stable over the test period. Leucaena leucocephala seed oil extract had a concentration-dependent activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and the lotion formulation had good pharmaceutical properties.
... Of the two legume tree species native to Puerto Rican STDF, only Pithecellobium unguis-cati is known to form nitrogen-fixing nodules, while this trait has not been reported in Pictetia aculeata (Sprent, 2001). Since its introduction to Puerto Rico sometime before 1825 (Parrotta, 1992), Leucaena appears have played the role of a pioneer tree in highly degraded STDF (Molina Colón and Lugo, 2006;Weaver and Schwagerl, 2008). Because fires were infrequent or absent in Puerto Rican STDF prior to human disturbance , this successional pathway was not prevalent for native species. ...
Article
Full-text available
Throughout the tropics, non-native grasses invade, dominate, and persist in areas where subtropical and tropical dry forests have been highly degraded. In Central America and the Caribbean Islands, forests that regenerate in grass-invaded areas are generally composed of one to a few tree species, usually of the Fabaceae family and often non-native. We investigated the ecological factors that drive these successional patterns in southwestern Puerto Rico, where African grasses dominate extensive areas that are maintained by fires. The non-native legume tree Leucaena leucocephala commonly establishes in these areas and forms persistent, mono-dominant stands. We planted 455 saplings of 13 native tree species and Leucaena in native forest understory and in grass-invaded areas that were either subjected to or protected from prescribed fires 4 months later. We measured growth and survival to test the following hypotheses: (1) saplings of native species are suppressed in grass-invaded areas compared to the forest understory, (2) Leucaena saplings outperform native species in grass-invaded areas, but not in the forest understory, and (3) Leucaena saplings are less susceptible to wildfires than native species. After 20 months, 50%, 40%, and 3% of native saplings survived in the forest, unburned-grass, and burned-grass treatments, respectively. Over the same period, 90%, 80%, and 25% of Leucaena survived in the same treatments. The fires immediately killed 65% of native saplings and 50% of Leucaena saplings. The majority of unburned native saplings died during a seasonal drought, when high irradiance and reduced soil organic matter content likely led to higher mortality in grass-invaded areas than in forest understory. Native species’ growth was low in all treatments, yet diameter growth was slightly higher in the unburned grass than the forest understory. Leucaena saplings grew faster than the native saplings in all three treatments, especially in the unburned grass. Slow growth and high mortality of native saplings in grass-invaded areas contribute to the dominance of Leucaena in forests that regenerate on these sites and suggest that Leucaena may play a beneficial role in dry forest restoration in the Caribbean.
Article
Full-text available
Underutilized legumes are common crops in developing countries with superior dietary potentials that could be useful sources of protein as well as some phytoconstituents. They are more tolerant of abiotic environmental conditions like drought than the major legumes. This makes them more adapted to harsh soil and climatic conditions, which helps to minimize the pressure brought on by climate change. However, despite their potential, underutilized legumes have been greatly overlooked compared to the major legumes due to supply constraints. Underutilized legumes in the subfamily Caesalpinioideae are better suited for use as animal feeds with little or no value as food for humans, and the extracts and infusions of the different parts of plant species in this subfamily are traditionally used for the treatment of different diseases. In addition, underutilized legumes in this subfamily contain phytoconstituents that are of pharmacological relevance, some of which have been isolated, characterized and evaluated for use in the treatment of a variety of disorders. Therefore, this review describes the medicinal activities of some selected underutilized legumes from five genera in the subfamily Caesalpinioideae as well as their phytoconstituents, which could be exploited as lead compounds for drug discovery.
Article
The following review discusses the findings of existing research surrounding the nutritional impact of leaf meals as incorporated in chicken diets, the importance of forages in sustainable poultry production and the capacity of hens to digest high fibre diets. The potential of conventional and/ or outdoor based systems for developing countries, the effects of outdoor production systems on the welfare of laying hens, and methods used in measuring forage intake and the feed items obtained by hens from the outdoor area are also discussed. This review highlights those factors affecting range utilisation, behaviours of free range hens and the recommendations for better range utilisation by laying hens, particularly in the tropics.
Article
The yield of 10 strains of Leucaena from widely separated regions in the Tropics was determined in replicated field trials. Yields varied from 3 to 8 tons of dry forage per acre per year between strains; these differences in yield are significant. The superiority of strains of L. leucocephala from Guatemala, El Salvador, Australia, and Peru is shown. Annual yields of protein varied from 832 to 2,550 pounds per acre. The protein content of dry forage ranged from 14 percent for L. esculenta from Mexico to 16.2 for a strain of L. leucocephala from the U.S. Virgin Islands. Any of these strains, producing 5 to 10 tons of dry forage and a ton of protein per acre annually, would serve as an excellent protein source for livestock enterprises in the dry Tropics.
Leucaena wood production and use. Waimanalo, HI: Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association
  • Rj Van Den Beldt
  • Jl Brewbaker
Van den Beldt RJ, Brewbaker JL, eds. 1985. Leucaena wood production and use. Waimanalo, HI: Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association. 50 p.
In gardens of Hawaii. Special Publ. 50
  • Mc Neal
Neal MC. 1965. In gardens of Hawaii. Special Publ. 50. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press. 924 p.
Varietal trials of Leucaena leucocephala (Akoa haole@) in Hawaii
  • Jl Brewbaker
  • Dl Plucknett
  • V Gonzales
Brewbaker JL, Plucknett DL, Gonzales V. 1972. Varietal trials of Leucaena leucocephala (Akoa haole@) in Hawaii. Res. Bull. 166. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, College of Agriculture, Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. 29 p.
Koa haole (Leucaena glauca): its establishment, culture, and utilization as a forage crop
  • M Takahashi
  • Jc Ripperton
Takahashi M, Ripperton JC. 1949. Koa haole (Leucaena glauca): its establishment, culture, and utilization as a forage crop. Res. Bull. 100. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, College of Agriculture. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. 56 p.
Leucaena leucocephala, leucaena In: Schopmeyer CS, tech. coord. Seeds of woody plants in the United States
  • Cd Whitesell
Whitesell CD. 1974. Leucaena leucocephala, leucaena. In: Schopmeyer CS, tech. coord. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handbk. 450. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service: 491B493. leucaena--4