Dinosaur tracks are biogenic, sedimentary structures
and not body fossils or biological objects in the common
sense. They result from the complex interaction of the
kinematics of the trackmaker, its foot anatomy, and the
substrate properties, and from taphonomic processes
acting prior to the incorporation of the tracks into the
sedimentary record. The objective of this work is an
interdisciplinary study of a large sample of dinosaur
tracks and trackways linking sedimentology with vertebrate
ichnology, palaeontology, and palaeoecology.
Excellent conditions are provided by the Late
Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) Chevenez—Combe Ronde
tracksite, which is one of several tracksites located
on the future course of the Transjurane highway
near Porrentruy (Canton Jura, NW Switzerland).
Here, eight superimposed dinosaur track-bearing
surfaces were systematically excavated level-by-level
within a 0,65 m thick laminite interval, unearthing
almost 1400 dinosaur tracks. The main track level,
located at the base of the interval, is the most diverse
ichnoassemblage composed of 14 trackways of tiny
(Pes Length < 25 cm) and small (25 cm < PL < 50 cm)
sauropods and 43 trackways of minute (PL < 10 cm),
small (10 cm < PL < 20 cm), and medium-sized
(20 cm < PL < 30 cm) bipedal, tridactyl dinosaurs.
The main issues are: (1) identification of true tracks,
undertracks, and overtracks, and their relationships with
substrate properties, their link with the exposure index,
and their utility in the reconstruction of the palaeoenvironment;
(2) implications of the main track level
ichnoassemblage for dinosaur behaviour, the terrestrial
palaeoecosystem, and vertebrate ichnofacies; (3) relationships
between variability in trackway patterns and
configurations with locomotion speed, behaviour, and
substrate properties as well as implications for locomotion
capabilities; (4) Quantification and relevance
of sauropod trackway gauge; and (5) interpretation of
manus-dominated and pes-only sauropod trackways.
The approach is first actualistic by studying
human footprints and processes acting during their
formation and preservation on modern tidal-flats.
In these highly structured environments, microbial
mats are ubiquitous, strongly facies-specific, and
occupy a key position during and after footprint formation.
Undertracks readily form in biolaminated
sediment, whilst underprints and deep tracks are
common in unlaminated, water-saturated sediment.
Most consolidated vertebrate tracks are affected
by taphonomic processes, including renewed
and/or repeated growth of microbial mats leading
to the formation of modified true tracks, internal
overtracks (track fills), and overtracks.
The sauropod tracks and the encasing laminite
interval of the Combe Ronde site are then subject
of detailed sedimentological and taphonomical
analyses. This discloses the sediment properties at
the time of track formation and reveals the processes
modifying the tracks during subaerial exposure
and integrating them into the sedimentary record.
Track morphology, associated track features,
and sedimentary features can be linked with the
exposure index, identifying the palaeoenvironment
as a supratidal flat not located in close proximity
to a coastline. These flats were susceptible for
track recording only during short periods after
wetting due to a rainy period or due to occasional
storms. Longer periods of subaerial exposure prior
to burial are indicated by the presence of internal
overtracks and/or overtracks, and rapid covering
up is indicated by the lack of overtracks on top
of tracks with large displacement rims. Crosssections
of sauropod tracks provide insight into
the consolidation history of the substrate prior to
track formation and into the walking dynamics
of dinosaurs, confirming that sauropods put their
hindfeet in a pronounced plantigrade way on the
ground.
The level-by-level superimposition of the studied
surfaces enables to identify true tracks, undertracks,
and overtracks. The best-defined true tracks
(anatomical morphotypes) of the main track level
are then used for ichnotaxonomy and trackmaker
identification, and the detailed analyses of trackway
parameters, including trackway gauge, provide
insight into the locomotion capabilities of dinosaurs.
The best-defined minute and small tridactyl tracks can
be assigned to the ichnogenus Carmelopodus, extending
it from the Middle Jurassic into the Late Jurassic.
These tracks were likely left by a small theropod dinosaur
similar in size to Compsognathus or Juravenator.
The medium-sized tridactyl tracks of morphotype II
exhibit some of the typical features of the ichnogenus
Therangospodus (attributed to large and robust theropods)
but also some of ornithopod ichnotaxa.
The sauropod trackways show a wide range of patterns
and configurations but are all medium- to widegauge.
Therefore, they are assigned tentatively to the
ichnogenus Brontopodus attributed to derived “brachiosaurid”
or “titanosaurid” dinosaurs. The variability
of the trackways reflects the general locomotion
capabilities of the trackmakers and is an expression of
individual walking style and behaviour, which may be
related to substrate properties. Trackway patterns (the
degree of manus overprinting by the pes) and different
trackway configurations including trackway gauge are
not only related to locomotion speed, and they provide
no evidence of a relationship with ontogeny.
The gauge of sauropod trackways can be
quantified with the pes trackway ratio and the here
defined [WAP/PL]-ratio (Width of the pes Angulation
Pattern / Pes Length). Gauge is possibly related to
the substrate and the behaviour of the trackmaker
adapting to it, but this does not change the overall
medium-gauge to wide-gauge appearance of the
trackways. The manus-dominated and pes-only
sauropod trackways of the Combe Ronde site are
explained by trackmakers exerting more pressure on
the manus than the pes, and by overprinting of the
manus by the pes, respectively.
The alignment of trackways on the main track
level shows no evidence of a nearby shoreline and
of interactions between the different groups of
dinosaurs. It indicates gregarious behaviour amongst
tiny and small sauropods, and suggests that minute
and small bipedal dinosaurs were frequent visitors on
the supratidal flats.
The ichnoassemblage of the main track level is
the first one found in the Jura Mountains displaying
abundant minute and small tridactyl tracks. This is
also typical for the other Ajoie ichnoassemblages,
which further exhibit tracks of tiny to large (up to 1,1
m PL) sauropods, and tracks of medium-sized to large
(up to 0,8 m PL) bipedal dinosaurs. Sauropod
trackways include narrow-gauge and wide-gauge
trackways indicating the presence of “basal” and
derived sauropods. This suggests that dwarfed
insular animals can be excluded as trackmakers of
the tiny and small sauropod trackways of the Ajoie
ichnoassemblages and the Combe Ronde tracksite
and that the Jura carbonate platform was connected
with the landmasses of the London-Brabant Massif
and the Massif Central during periods of emersion.
Dinosaurs used the Jura carbonate platform for the
establishment of in situ, predominantly saurischian
dinosaur populations, but also as a migration corridor
between the massifs.
Because the Ajoie ichnoassemblages are dominated
by small tridactyl tracks, they differ from other
Jurassic tetrapod ichnofacies in carbonate settings,
notably from the Brontopodus ichnofacies. In the
case of those ichnoassemblages commonly attributed
to the Brontopodus ichnofacies, the lack or rareness
of small tridactyl tracks may indicate the absence
of small trackmakers in those palaeoenvironments
or unsuitable conditions for the formation and
preservation of small tracks.
This study highlights the benefits of systematic
and interdisciplinary analyses of dinosaur tracks,
which disclose variations related to behaviour and
to differences in substrate. This allows recognizing
anatomical morphotypes and trackway configurations
representative of typical trackmaker behaviour. The
latter can then also be used in ichnotaxonomical
classification. Similar approaches should be in the
focus of future work and performed on the other
tracksites and ichnoassemblages of the Ajoie.
Together with the evidence from other tracksites of the
Jura Mountains, this will contribute towards a better
understanding of the terrestrial palaeoenvironments
and palaeogeography, and of dinosaur palaeoecology
and palaeobiogeography on the Jura carbonate
platform.