ArticlePDF Available

New Data on the Morphology of Shell Muscles in Cambrian Helcionelloid Mollusks

Authors:

Abstract

Scars of shell muscles have been discovered on internal molds of helcionelloid mollusks of the family Stenothecidae for the first time. The localization of the scars is similar to that in the family Coreospiridae. Since these two families evolved from the ancestral group independently, similar shell muscle systems of Cambrian helcionelloid mollusks may be explained by parallel development.
254
Paleontological Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 254–256. Translated from Paleontologicheskii Zhurnal, No. 3, 2004, pp. 27–29.
Original Russian Text Copyright © 2004 by Parkhaev.
English Translation Copyright © 2004 by
åÄIä “Nauka
/Interperiodica” (Russia).
INTRODUCTION
After a recent publication by this author in which
the muscle scars of the Cambrian univalved mollusks
were described for the first time (Parkhaev, 2002a), the
study of the internal molds of mollusks of this age using
SEM was continued in order to yield new data on the
morphology of the shell muscle system. In this way,
scars of shell muscles have been discovered in molds of
helcionelloid mollusks from the family Stenothecidae.
MATERIAL
The material being studied is housed at the Paleon-
tological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
(collection nos. 2019, 4368, and 4664).
DISCUSSION
The internal molds of
Anabarella
sp. from the
Lower Cambrian of Transbaikal Region (Bystraya For-
mation, Georgievka Locality) contain a site with cellu-
lar microsculpture (Pl. 2, fig. 5) that is similar in
appearance to scars of shell muscles that have been
described earlier for Cambrian mollusks from the fam-
ilies Helcionellidae, Coreospiridae, and Onychochil-
idae (Parkhaev, 2002a). The scar is situated in the sub-
apical part of the mold at the boundary between its pos-
terior surface and the roof of the parietal train. The scar
consists of polygonal depressions that are 10–12
μ
m in
diameter and thin dividing balks approximately 3
μ
m
wide (Pl. 2, fig. 2). Such a type of microrelief of the
internal mold surface is a replica of the prismatic shell
layer, i.e., myostracum. The pallial myostracum shows
a similar prismatic structure in different groups of mol-
lusks and even in brachiopods (Taylor
et al.
, 1969;
1973; Williams and Wright, 1970; Popov, 1977;
Parkhaev, 2002a).
After the above-mentioned scars on the molds of
Transbaikalian anabarellas were discovered, I restudied
the vast collection of mollusks from the Lower Cam-
brian of South Australia, in which there are also mem-
bers of the genus
Anabarella
. The collection contains
several hundred differently preserved internal molds
and shells of
Anabarella australis
Runnegar, 1990.
Thorough investigation of the best preserved internal
molds revealed that some specimens bear muscle scars
on the subapical surface. The scars are not as distinct as
in Transbaikalian anabarellas (the polygonal depres-
sions and dividing balks are not as prominent in relief),
have a different shape, and slightly differ in position
New Data on the Morphology of Shell Muscles
in Cambrian Helcionelloid Mollusks
P. Yu. Parkhaev
Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya ul. 123, Moscow, 117997 Russia
e-mail: pparkh@paleo.ru
Received December 26, 2002
Abstract
—Scars of shell muscles have been discovered on internal molds of helcionelloid mollusks of the fam-
ily Stenothecidae for the first time. The localization of the scars is similar to that in the family Coreospiridae.
Since these two families evolved from the ancestral group independently, similar shell muscle systems of Cam-
brian helcionelloid mollusks may be explained by parallel development.
Key words
: morphology, Cambrian, univalved mollusks, shell muscles.
Explanation of Plate 2
Fig. 1.
Oelandiella korobkovi
Vostokova, 1962; specimen no. 4368/1008, internal mold; Lower Cambrian, lower part of the Tom-
motian Stage, Siberian Platform, southwestern Anabar Region, Kotu
œ
River: (1a) internal mold, right view,
×
26; (1b) umbilical area
with muscle scar,
×
250; (1c) same view, supposed margin of the scar is dotted,
×
250.
Fig. 2.
Anabarella
sp.; specimen no. 2019/1036, internal mold; Lower Cambrian, Botoman Stage; Transbaikalia, Chita Region, vil-
lage of Georgievka: (2a) internal mold, right view,
×
95; (2b) subapical area with muscle scar,
×
370; (2c) same view, supposed mar-
gin of the scar is dotted,
×
370.
Figs. 3 and 4.
Anabarella australis
Runnegar in Bengtson
et al.
, 1990; Lower Cambrian, Botoman Stage, South Australia, Yorke
Peninsula, Parara Limestone; (3) specimen no. 4664/1295, internal mold; Curramulka Quarry: (3a) internal mold, left view,
×
57;
(3b) subapical area with muscle scar,
×
110; (3c) same view, supposed margin of the scar is dotted,
×
110; (4) specimen
no. 4664/1648, internal mold; SYC-101 Borehole, depth 198.5 m: (4a) internal mold, left view,
×
60; (4b) subapical area with muscle
scar,
×
150; (4c) same view, supposed margin of the scar is dotted,
×
150.
PALEONTOLOGICAL JOURNAL
Vol. 38
No. 3
2004
NEW DATA ON THE MORPHOLOGY OF SHELL MUSCLES 255
1‡
Plate 2
300
μ
m1b 1c
30
μ
m
100
μ
m2‡ 2b 2c
3‡ 300
μ
m3b 3c
100
μ
m
4‡ 300
μ
m4b 4c
(Pl. 2, figs. 2, 3). A major part of the muscle scar in
A. australis
lies on the roof of the parietal train and
extends slightly to the posterior surface of the mold. In
addition, the scar goes as far as the lateral surfaces of
the train. The polygonal depressions are 10–15
μ
m in
diameter, and the width of the balks is about 3–5
μ
m.
Thus, muscle scars have been found in members of
the family Stenothecidae for the first time. It is note-
worthy that the position of these scars on the subapical
surface of the molds is also typical of another group of
Cambrian mollusks, i.e., the family Coreospiridae
(Pl. 2, fig. 1).
256
PALEONTOLOGICAL JOURNAL
Vol. 38
No. 3
2004
PARKHAEV
If the phylogenetic development of the Cambrian
univalved mollusks that was assumed by the author ear-
lier (Parkhaev, 2002b) is correct, i.e., the families
Coreospiridae and Stenothecidae evolved from the
ancestral Helcionellidae independently, this is an exam-
ple of parallel evolution of shell muscles in helcionel-
loid mollusks.
It is probable that the same localization of the mus-
cle attachment sites in coreospirids and stenothecids
was achieved by the general modification of the shell
shape in the ancestral helcionellids, which was accom-
panied by the displacement of the shell muscles from
the anterolateral areas to the subapical zone (figure). It
is obvious that, in the case of coreospirids, this dis-
placement is a result of spiral coiling of the shell. In
stenothecids, the shells of which are strongly laterally
compressed, the muscle displacement may be due to
this lateral compression. Today, unfortunately, we have
no data on the position of the muscle scars in the family
Trenellidae, which most probably evolved from Hel-
cionellidae and is ancestral to Stenothecidae (figure).
It is quite possible that trenellids possessed an inter-
mediate morphology in which muscles were located on
the lateral surface within the apical part of the shell.
It is noteworthy that the variability in shell structure
and the numerous cases of parallel development in shell
muscles are fairly common in gastropods. For instance,
a horseshoe-shaped shell muscle occurs among differ-
ent and relatively phylogenetically distant groups of
recent gastropods. In general, with slight modifications,
it is most typical of members of the primitive sub-
classes Scutibranchia and Cyclobranchia but also
occurs in some groups of Pectinibranchia (Capulidae
and Muricidae), Divasibranchia (Siphonariidae), and
even in Pulmonata (Acroloxidae and Planorbidae).
All these cases of independent development of the
horseshoe-shaped shell muscle are due to similar shell
morphogenesis (all the above-mentioned gastropods
have shells with a cap-shaped or similar form).
Obviously, the high plasticity of shell morphology
and, as a result, the plasticity in the structure of the shell
muscles were already present among Cambrian hel-
cionelloid mollusks. Thus, this supplies additional evi-
dence that helcionelloid mollusks belong to gastropods.
A further study of the microsculpture and microstruc-
ture of the shell of Cambrian univalved mollusks will
assist us in reconstructing the major evolutionary
changes in the shell muscular system, thus, in turn, pro-
viding additional material for the study of the evolution
of the earliest gastropods.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I am grateful to A.Yu. Rozanov for critical com-
ments and valuable discussions, to A.V. Mazin for pho-
tographs, and to L.T. Protasevitch for technical assis-
tance in using SEM. The study was supported by the
Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project
nos. 02-04-06198, 00-04-48409, 00-15-97764, and
03-04-06065).
REFERENCES
1. P. Yu. Parkhaev, “Phylogeny and Systematics of the
Cambrian Univalved Mollusks,” Paleontol. Zh., No. 1,
27–39 (2002a).
2. P. Yu. Parkhaev, “Muscle Scars of Cambrian Univalved
Mollusks and Their Systematic Importance,” Paleontol.
Zh., No. 5, 15–19 (2002b).
3. S. V. Popov, “Shell Microstructure and Systematics of
Cardiids” Tr. Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR
153
,
1
124 (1977).
4. J. D. Taylor, W.J. Kennedy, and A. Hall, “The Shell
Structure and Mineralogy of the Bivalvia,” Bull. Brit.
Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool.
3
(Suppl.), 1–125 (1969).
5. J. D. Taylor, W.J. Kennedy, and A. Hall, “The Shell
Structure and Mineralogy of the Bivalvia,” Bull. Brit.
Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool.
22
(9), 253–294 (1973).
6. A. Williams and A.D. Wright,
Shell Structure of the Cra-
niacea and Other Calcareous Inarticulate Brachiopoda
(Palaeontol. Assoc., London, 1970).
Coreospiridae
Helcionellidae
Trenellidae
(
no data on the position
of shell muscles
)
Stenothecidae
Changes in the localization of the attachment sites of shell muscles in helcionelloid mollusks that are associated with the morpho-
genesis of the shell (muscle scars are hatched).
... There are distinct boundaries between them and those without central tubercles ( Figure 6C,N). A similar microsculpture has been commonly discovered from the early Cambrian Mollusca [35,38,39,41,[45][46][47][48]. ...
... Moreover, the convex and concave polygonal textures were both interpreted as the imprints of muscle scars, for example, the polygonal microrelief structure in the columellar area of Aldanella rozanovi and the relief honeycomb microsculpture in the subapical area of Oelandiella sp. [46][47][48]. In this study, we prefer to interpret the zone with the imprints of the polygonal structures on the internal molds of the Eohalobia sclerites as the muscle attachment zone. ...
Article
Full-text available
The isolated sclerites of the Ocruranus and Eohalobia group are abundant among the early Cambrian small shelly fossil assemblages, which were recently assigned to the same scleritome as an early member of the polyplacophoran (chiton) stem lineage. However, the scleritome reconstruction and zoological affinities of these sclerites are still controversial due to the lack of exceptionally preserved articulated specimens with in-situ sclerites. Herein, we report new specimens of Ocruranus and Eohalobia sclerites from Member 5 of the Yanjiahe Formation, which provide new insights into the reconstruction of the original scleritome. The Eohalobia sclerites from the Yanjiahe Formation have an extended and upfolded proximal field with dense wrinkles, which seems to be a weakly mineralized structure and acted as a joint with another sclerite, Ocruranus. Comparing the butterfly-shaped proximal field on a unique sclerite of Eohalobia with the sub-apical field on Ocruranus sclerites suggests that the original scleritome of this group may consist of only two types of sclerites: the Ocruranus-type and the Eohalobia-type. The polygonal structure on the internal mold of Eohalobia sclerites is interpreted herein as the muscle attachment zone; their distribution corresponds well with that of the modern chitons, which provides strong evidence to support the close relationship between the Ocruranus–Eohalobia group and the Polyplacophora.
... According to it, the helcionelloid mollusks are the oldest representatives of the class Gastropoda. In recent years, this model has received a new development and detailed substantiation from the standpoint of the shell functional morphology of Cambrian forms (Parkhaev, 2000(Parkhaev, , 2001(Parkhaev, , 2002a(Parkhaev, , 2002b(Parkhaev, , 2004. In general, the structures associated with the circulation of water inside the mantle cavity (grooves, siphons, sinuses) as well as the character of the shell muscles arrangement were studied (Parkhaev, 2000(Parkhaev, , 2002b(Parkhaev, , 2004(Parkhaev, , 2014b. ...
... In recent years, this model has received a new development and detailed substantiation from the standpoint of the shell functional morphology of Cambrian forms (Parkhaev, 2000(Parkhaev, , 2001(Parkhaev, , 2002a(Parkhaev, , 2002b(Parkhaev, , 2004. In general, the structures associated with the circulation of water inside the mantle cavity (grooves, siphons, sinuses) as well as the character of the shell muscles arrangement were studied (Parkhaev, 2000(Parkhaev, , 2002b(Parkhaev, , 2004(Parkhaev, , 2014b. As a result, the details of internal anatomy of Cambrian mollusks and some peculiarities of their ecology were reconstructed and extensive data were obtained, making possible to solve taxonomic problems. ...
Article
Full-text available
Possible phylogenetic relationships of the Cambrian gastropod subclass Archaeobranchia with other high-rank taxa of the Golikov–Starobogatov's gastropod macrosystem are reconstructed. Archaeo-branchians can be direct or indirect ancestors to five extant subclasses, i.e., Cyclobranchia, Scutibranchia, Pectinibranchia, Divasibranchia, and Dextrobranchia. Three euthyneural subclasses (Sinistrobranchia, Opistobranchia, and Pulmonata) are later descendants of Divasibranchia. The model for transformation of the shell muscles arrangement reconstructed previously for the Cambrian cap-shaped mollusks, towards the muscle system of modern cyclobranchians is proposed. The evolution of Cyclobranchia through the minia-turization stage can explain reduction of the right portion of organs in the mantle complex.
... Despite some uncertainties, general phylogenetic opinions consider maikhanellids to be related to mollusks (Bengtson, 1992;Li et al., 2007), a conclusion that has been supported by studies on the microstructure of their shells (Kouchinsky, 1999;Parkhaev, 2004Parkhaev, , 2014Vendrasco et al., 2009Vendrasco et al., , 2010Vendrasco et al., , 2011Vendrasco and Checa, 2015). Previous studies considered the maikhanellids to be related to monoplacophorans (Qian and Bengtson, 1989;Feng et al., 2001;Yu, 2014) due to general morphological similarities in shell shape, although a detailed analysis based on muscle scar imprints or ultrastructure never established this relationship. ...
Article
Cap-shaped skeletal fossils are the earliest undisputed body fossils of mollusks appearing in the basal Cambrian. A study on the morphometry of cap-shaped fossils from the Nanjiang area (North Sichuan, China) is undertaken to understand the origin and evolution of the early mollusks. The distribution of these fossil cap-shaped mollusks indicates a stepwise increase in their diversity during the early Cambrian. Maikhanella Zhegallo in Voronin et al., 1982 co-occuring with the spinose sclerites of siphogonuchitids, is regarded as the earliest scleritized mollusk. It is followed by other maikhanellids, e.g., Purella Missarzhevsky, 1974 and Yunnanopleura Yu, 1987, which co-occur with the earliest univalved helcionellids, e.g., Igorella Missarzhevsky in Rozanov et al., 1969. Cluster analysis of their morphometric characteristics shows that the Maikhanella group is similar to the Purella and Yunnanopleura groups, but is less comparable with univalved helcionellids. The maikhanellids are interpreted as representatives of the stem group Aculifera, although it remains uncertain if one or two larger cap-shaped shell plates were present on the elongate slug-like body, comparable to those of Halkieria Poulsen, 1967 or Orthrozanclus Conway Morris and Caron, 2007. Maikhanellids are characterized by the prominent protrusions or scales on the cap-shaped shell plates arranged in a concentric pattern around the shell apex. Evolutionarily, the protrusions or scales are reduced in younger strata, whereas subsequently a typically concentric ornament developed, the cap-shaped shell plates developed higher profiles, and the apical region became increasingly bare of scales. Meanwhile, the cap-shaped shell plates gradually evolved into a helcionellid-like appearance with an anteroposteriorly inclined apex. The morphological evolution of the earliest sclerotized mollusks reflects biotic evolution and environmental adaption among the stem-group mollusks during the early Cambrian.
... Similar polygonal textures were previously described from the apical area and dorsal margin of Anabarella plana, and were interpreted as representing a prismatic outer shell layer ( Fig. 6A; Kouchinsky 1999). However, the polygonal network on the surface of molluscan internal moulds have also been interpreted as imprints of muscle scars (Fig. 6C, D; Parkhaev 2004bParkhaev , 2006Parkhaev , 2014, intra-prismatic membrane ( Fig. 6B; Vendrasco et al. 2010a, b), cells or cell aggregates of the outer mantle epithelium (Ushatinskaya & Parkhaev 2005), nacre or intra-nacreous membrane ( Fig. 6E; Vendrasco et al. 2015). In addition, Vendrasco et al. (2015) argued that a similar polygonal texture could also be formed during diagenetic alteration (Fig. 6F). ...
Article
Full-text available
Although various types of shell microstructures are documented from Cambrian molluscs, the precise organization and mineralogical composition of Terreneuvian molluscs are relatively unknown. Anabarella was one of the first helcionellid molluscs to appear in the Terreneuvian, with the genus surviving until the third epoch of the Cambrian. Here, shell microstructures of Anabarella australis have been studied based on new collections from the lower Cambrian (Series 2) Xinji Formation of the North China Block. Results show that A. australis has a laminar inner shell layer that consists of crossed foliated lamellar microstructure (CFL). Nacreous, crossed-lamellar and foliated aragonite microstructures previously documented in the older (Terreneuvian) species A. plana are here revised as preservational artefacts of the CFL layers. This complex skeletal organization of Anabarella suggests that mechanisms of molluscan biomineralization evolved very rapidly. Morphologically, specimens from the Chaijiawa section show a pattern of distinct ‘pseudo-dimorphism’ as external coatings are identical to Anabarella, while associated internal moulds are similar to the helcionelloid genus Planutenia. In contrast, internal moulds from the Shangzhangwan section show considerable morphological variation owing to preservational bias and show greater similarities to specimens from South Australia, Northeast Greenland and Germany. These observations demonstrate that the extensive morphological variation seen in the internal moulds of the cosmopolitan genus Anabarella are primarily preservational artefacts and are unlikely to represent the real intra- and interspecific variability of the animal. In these cases, Planutenia is here confirmed to be a subjective synonym of Anabarella.
Article
Full-text available
Small shelly fossils (SSFs) are highly informative of the ‘Cambrian explosion’. Their palaeobiodiversity has been documented from lower Cambrian deposits worldwide but it remains elusive in areas such as Iran, despite this region occupying a critical position on the north-western Gondwana margin during the early Cambrian. This new study of the SSFs of the lower Cambrian of northern Iran provides a large new dataset from this understudied area. We revise the micropalaeontological signal of the Soltanieh Formation of the Alborz Mountains and introduce novel data from the Soltanieh and overlying Barut Formations of the Soltanieh Mountains. The new, solid taxonomic and stratigraphic SSF data enable us to distinguish two successive microfaunal assemblages. The first occurs in the Soltanieh Formation of the Soltanieh and Alborz Mountains and is dominated by anabaritids (Anabarites trisulcatus, A. ex gr. trisulcatus, A. tristichus, A. dalirense sp. nov., Cambrotubulus decurvatus) along with protoconodonts (Protohertzina anabarica and P. unguliformis), maikhanellids (Maikhanella multa, Purella squamulosa and Purella sp.), Aetholicopalla adnata, indeterminate cones and irregular tubes. The second assemblage, from the Barut Formation, is dominated by a diverse assemblage of molluscs (Oelandiella korobkovi and cap-shaped morphotypes). Siphogonuchitid sclerites also occur in both assemblages. The two SSF assemblages are characteristic of the Terreneuvian. Our dataset enables us to assess the sequence of faunal change of the Ediacaran–Cambrian transition; in contrast to the tube–sclerite–brachiopod succession presented in the literature, the Iranian fauna changes from one dominated by tubes and sclerites, to one dominated by molluscs and sclerites.
Article
Full-text available
A diverse group of molluscs from the Cambrian Series 2, Stages 3–4 Xinji Formation of the North China Block (NCB) is described, based on more than 4500 specimens from three well‐studied sections in Shaanxi and Henan provinces, along the southern and southwestern margin of the NCB. Twenty molluscan species are identified, including one bivalve, three stem group gastropods, and 16 additional helcionelloids. Among these, six helcionelloid species are reported from the NCB for the first time, and one new species, Parailsanella luonanensis sp. nov. is proposed. This diverse molluscan fauna shares a large number of species with contemporaneous faunas of South Australia (15), Antarctica (7), Laurentia (6), Siberia (3) and South China (1). Faunal similarities are even greater on a generic level. The striking similarities of the molluscan faunas of North China, South Australia and Antarctica strongly support the hypothesis that the NCB was situated close to Eastern Gondwana, most likely close to South Australia in the Cambrian Epoch 2. In addition, well‐preserved shell attachment muscle scars were observed in the helcionelloid Figurina figurina, with two pairs of symmetrical, continuous, band‐like muscle scars, which are obviously different from the musculature of both gastropods and monoplacophorans. Because of this unique musculature, these characteristic Cambrian cap‐like molluscs are assigned to the Helcionelloida rather than to the Gastropoda or Monoplacophora.
Article
Full-text available
An assemblage of Cambrian Series 2, Stages 3–4, conchiferan mollusks from the Shackleton Limestone, Transantarctic Mountains, East Antarctica, is formally described and illustrated. The fauna includes one bivalve, one macromollusk, and 10 micromollusks, including the first description of the species Xinjispira simplex Zhou and Xiao, 1984 outside North China. The new fauna shows some similarity to previously described micromollusks from lower Cambrian glacial erratics from the Antarctic Peninsula. The fauna, mainly composed of steinkerns, is relatively low diversity, but the presence of diagnostic taxa, including helcionelloid Davidonia rostrata (Zhou and Xiao, 1984), bivalve Pojetaia runnegari Jell, 1980, cambroclavid Cambroclavus absonus Conway Morris in Bengtson et al., 1990, and bradoriid Spinospitella coronata Skovsted et al., 2006, as well as the botsfordiid brachiopod Schizopholis yorkensis (Ushatinskaya and Holmer in Gravestock et al., 2001), in the overlying Holyoake Formation correlates the succession to the Dailyatia odyssei Zone (Cambrian Stages 3–4) in South Australia.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
New problematic helcionelloid molluscs from the Shackleton Limestone (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 3-4) outcropping in the Transantarctic Mountains can be reliably identified to the new Dailyatia odyssei Zone of South Australia. Keystone taxa such as the Zone’s eponym, Pojetaia runnegari and Mackinnonia rostrata also allow for increased correlation of East Antarctica to other rock units in East Gondwana as well as Laurentia. Most taxa are represented by relatively poorly preserved steinkerns (internal moulds), reflected in their open nomenclature. Presented are results of elliptical Fourier analysis of the outlines of steinkerns of Mackinnonia rostrata from the Shackleton Limestone and Ajax limestone (Cambrian Series 2, Stages 3-4, South Australia) and Mackinnonia taconica from the Bastion Limestone (Cambrian Series 2, Stages 3-4, North-East Greenland). Principal component analysis of the protoconchs and supra-apical field is capable of reliably (p<0.05) distinguishing the three groups. The intraspecific variation uncovered between the M. rostrata assemblages is interpreted as incipient speciation. Problems with helcionelloid identification and taxonomy which hinder reliable biostratigraphy may be solved by techniques such as elliptical Fourier analysis which is sensitive to subtle morphological variation.
Article
Identification of the primary constituents of small shelly fossil (SSF) shells is important for explaining the evolution of SSF faunas. The characteristics and constituents of Terreneuvian tubular SSFs found in north-east Sichuan, China, are revealed using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Petrographic thin sections indicate that the chemical composition of the shells is mainly calcium carbonate with smaller amounts of phosphorus, silica and pyrite. Most of the tubular shells composed of calcium carbonate have a distinct layered structure. Evidence of replacement of the original shell by phosphatization, pyritization and silicification, and recrystallization of calcium carbonate have been found, all of which destroyed the shell's original layered structure. Most fossils treated with acetic acid are phosphatic casts or steinkerns, with some preserving organic textures of the shell as phosphatic casts. We conclude that the Terreneuvian tubular SSFs from north-east Sichuan were originally composed mainly of calcium carbonate; indeed, most Terreneuvian small skeletal fossils appear to have had an originally calcareous composition. The fossil casts or internal core fossils are composed of phosphate, which is related to local taphonomic processes.
Article
Full-text available
The history of the study and the development of ideas about the systematic position of the Cambrian univalved mollusks is reviewed. On the basis of the functional morphology of shells (Parkhaev, 2000a, 2001a), the phylogenetic scenario of the evolution of the group is reconstructed and its systematics is determined. Several new taxa are described, i.e., Archaeobranchia subclas. nov., Khairkhaniiformes ordo nov., Igarkiellidae fam. nov., Trenellidae fam. nov., Watsonellinae subfam. nov., and Runnegarella gen. nov.
Article
Full-text available
The structure of the shell muscles among the Cambrian mollusks has been a stumbling block for malacologists studying the morphology and phylogeny of the most ancient members of the phylum Mollusca. Apart from several dubious finds of the muscle scars among very few forms of the helcionelloideans (Runnegar, 1981; Vassiljeva, 1990; 1998, Geyer, 1994), the reliable position of the muscles within their shells remains unknown, and this fact has been repeatedly noted in the literature (Runnegar and Pojeta, 1974; Pojeta and Run-negar, 1976; Yochelson, 1978; Peel, 1991). This cir-cumstance coincides with the fact that, to date, we have obtained extensive data on the helcionelloid mollusks: about 500 of nominal species are already described (personal estimation). It is really surprising that the shells or internal moulds of helcionelloideans have sometimes perfect preservation even with visible ele-ments of the wall microstructure (Runnegar, 1983; Bengtson et al. , 1990; Kouchinsky, 2000) but, at the same time, lack the muscle scars, which can be rather distinctly preserved among some other Cambrian mol-lusks (bivalves, bellerophontids, etc.). To explain such a riddle, I speculated (Parkhaev, 2000) that the absence of the muscle scars on the shell of helcionelloideans could have been caused by a spe-cific position of the muscle attachment zone. Probably, the muscles were attached to the shell on the parietal wall in the subapical area. Therefore, it is really difficult to find the scars in this place due to its minor area, not very common preservation, or overlapping by the sub-sequent whorl (in coiled shells). Recent investigations support this speculation, at least for the spirally coiled forms. Also, the scars of the shell muscles were found on the internal moulds of cap-shaped helcionellids. The result of this study is presented in the paper. MATERIAL The extensive collection (about 5000 specimens) from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia (housed at
  • A Williams
  • A D Wright
A. Williams and A.D. Wright, Shell Structure of the Craniacea and Other Calcareous Inarticulate Brachiopoda (Palaeontol. Assoc., London, 1970).