ArticlePDF Available

Orthodontics and root resorption. Part 1

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The first article in this series of two aims to outline the biological processes which form the basis of orthodontically-induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). It will also provide an overview of patient-related factors associated with OIIRR.
Content may be subject to copyright.
102
Orthodontic Update October 2010
Orthodontics and Root
Resorption Part 1
Abstract: The first article in this series of two aims to outline the biological processes which form the basis of orthodontically-induced
inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). It will also provide an overview of patient-related factors associated with OIIRR.
Clinical Relevance: This paper reviews the current evidence, in particular the patient-related aetiological factors, so that practitioners are
aware and can inform patients of these risks and, if possible, minimize the extent to which it occurs.
Ortho Update 2010; 3: 102–106
Christopher S Barker, BChD, MFDS RCS(Ed), Specialist Registrar in Orthodontics, Farnaz Parvizi, MPhil, BDS, FDS RCS(Eng), MOrth RCS(Ed),
Senior Registrar (FTTA) in Orthodontics, Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Frank Weiland, DMD, PhD, Specialist Practitioner
in Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, University Dental School, Vienna, Austria, Jonathan R Sandy, PhD, MOrth RCS, FDS RCS,
FMedSci, Professor and Honorary Consultant in Orthodontics and Anthony J Ireland, PhD, MSc, BDS, FDS RCS, MOrth RCS, Consultant in
Orthodontics, Royal United Hospitals, Bath Reader in Orthodontics, Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental School, Bristol, UK.
External apical root resorption
(EARR) stimulated by orthodontic
forces is known as orthodontically-
induced inflammatory root resorption
(OIIRR) and is a common complication of
orthodontic treatment. This association
has been recognized for many years and
it is known that some resorption occurs
in almost every patient who undergoes
orthodontic treatment. The prevalence
of OIIRR is such that it is seen in 90% of
patients under treatment. In most cases,
this is clinically insignificant.1 During a
course of orthodontic treatment, root
resorption results in an average loss of
around 1.5 mm per anterior tooth2 and has
been found to be severe (where at least
one tooth is affected by resorption greater
than 5 mm) in 5%3 of adults and 2%2 of
adolescents. When orthodontic forces are
applied, a local periodontal inflammatory
process is induced. This inflammation,
which is essential for tooth movement, is
the fundamental component of the root
resorption process and causes remodelling
of both cementum and dentine of
the roots.4 During periods of relative
quiescence, the cementum undergoes
repair such that, for most teeth in most
patients, the changes in root length are so
small as to be difficult to detect and are
often clinically insignificant5 (Figure 1).
Brezniak and Wasserstein4
describe three degrees of OIIRR:
Cemental or surface resorption with
remodelling. In this process, only the outer
cemental layers are resorbed and these are
later regenerated or remodelled.
Dentinal resorption with repair. In this
process, the cementum and the outer layers
of the dentine are resorbed and usually
repaired with cementoid material. The final
shape of the root after this resorption may
or may not be identical to the original form.
Circumferential apical root resorption.
In this process, full resorption of the
hard tissue components of the root apex
occurs and root shortening is evident
on radiographs. When the root loses
apical material beyond the cementum no
regeneration is possible.
Animal studies have
demonstrated that OIIRR is a part of what
is known as the hyaline zone elimination
process. Hyalinization occurs in the
periodontal ligament where the force
applied is above capillary blood pressure.
The affected tissues undergo aseptic
necrosis and send signals to macrophage
like cells, which then begin to remove this
tissue. Hyaline zone elimination is initiated
at its periphery, where the blood supply
to the periodontal ligament exists. During
this process of elimination, the nearby
outer surfaces of the root consisting of the
cementoblast layer covering the cementoid,
can be damaged leading to exposure of the
underlying, highly mineralized, cementum.
The resorption process continues until no
hyaline tissue is present and/or the force
level within the ligament decreases (Figures
2 and 3).
Categories of root resorption
Root resorption can be
categorized based on radiographic root
morphology and has been described by
several authors.6-7
Levander and Malmgren7
devised a classification which is as follows:
Grade 1: indicates an irregular root
outline;
Grade 2: < 2 mm root resorption (minor);
Grade 3: > 2 mm root resorption (severe);
Grade 4: resorption > one-third of root
length (extreme).
Occasionally, Grade 0 is added to this
classification to indicate no resorption
(Figure 4).
Aetiological factors
Christopher S Barker Farnaz Parvizi, Frank Weiland, Jonathan R Sandy and Anthony J Ireland
Orthodontic Update
103
October 2010
The aetiological factors
associated with OIIRR are complex and
multifactorial and can include patient-
related and treatment-related factors.1
Patient-related factors
Age
Most studies have not
found a consistent association between
chronological age and OIIRR.8 However,
Linge and Linge2 demonstrated that the
degree of root resorption observed in
patients undergoing treatment before
the age of 11 is less, perhaps due to the
preventive effect of the pre-dentine
layer on the underdeveloped roots. They
also suggested that resorption could be
avoided if tooth movement was completed
before the roots were fully developed.
Orthodontic tooth movement of immature
roots does not prevent root development
but these roots may not develop to their
true potential and have been found to be
shorter.9
Gender
There does not seem to be a
consistent association between gender
and OIIRR. Baumrind et al10 found a
greater prevalence of OIIRR in men than
in women in a group of adult orthodontic
patients. Conversely, Kjaer found a greater
prevalence of OIIRR in girls than in boys.11
Ethnicity
Sameshima and Sinclair’s12
Figure 1. (a) Pre-treatment DPT. (b) Mid-treatment DPT showing extensive root resorption in the labial
segments. (Courtesy of Mr Scott Deacon.)
a
b
Figure 2. Histological section of tooth exhibiting
root resorption.
Figure 3. Macroscopic identification of resorption lacunae occurring during orthodontic treatment and
a detailed view using confocal laser-scanning microscopy. From Weiland F. Constant versus dissipating
forces in or thodontics: the effect on initial tooth movement and root resorption. Eur J O rthod 2003; 25: 335-
342. Courtesy of Prof. F Weiland and reprinted with the permission of Oxford University Press.
104
Orthodontic Update October 2010
investigations into root resorption found
that there was a difference between
races, with Hispanic patients experiencing
significantly more OIIRR than White or Asian
patients. White patients tended to have less
OIIRR than Asians, although this was not
statistically significant
Medical history
There is not a strong association
between OIIRR and general health. Chronic
asthmatic patients have an increased
incidence of maxillary root resorption
(although not statistically significant),
perhaps as a result of the close proximity of
the apices to the inflamed maxillary sinus.13
Other investigators have named hormonal
deficiencies, such as hypothyroidism, as
risk factors, but this is not conclusive.14
There have been some anecdotal reports
of the effects of hyperparathyroidism on
root resorption with no consistent effects
described. Goultschin et al15 described
a case of an adult patient that showed
extensive external and internal root
resorption much like Figure 5. Midgett
et al.16 conducted an animal experiment
on beagle dogs with an induced state of
hyperparathyroidism. They found that
tooth movement in the experimental group
was quicker and related this to increased
bone turnover and decreased bone density.
There was no mention of an increase in root
resorption in these dogs.
Family history
There is a wide variation in
the extent of OIIRR between individuals
treated with the same mechanics and this
has led to the suggestion of a genetic
component to EARR. This was investigated
by Harris et al17 who conducted a study
into 103 full sibling pairs. They concluded
that there was a high genetic susceptibility
between siblings with an estimate of EARR
heritability of 70% for maxillary central
incisors and mandibular molars (but not
mandibular incisors). Although there is
very little the orthodontist can control
regarding the genetic component to OIIRR,
this information may be of use in alerting
the clinician to the possibility of increased
OIIRR in siblings of patients who have been
known to experience severe OIIRR.
Types of malocclusion
Patients with an acceptable
overjet and Class I occlusion at the
beginning of treatment are significantly
less likely to develop severe root resorption.
This probably reflects the smaller amounts
of tooth movement, particularly of the
maxillary incisors.
Class III cases are over-
represented in the group with severe root
resorption, perhaps owing to an increased
chance that proclined maxillary incisors
moving forward in compensation for Class
III skeletal relationship will have their roots
forced against the palatal cortical plate.5
Proffit18 suggests that some
malocclusions cause undesirable ’jiggling’
of the teeth once the teeth are in occlusion.
Such patients may have shortened roots
prior to treatment and are subsequently
at a higher risk of root resorption during
treatment, possibly due to uneven loading
of the periodontium.
Habits may also have a role in
the extent of root resorption. Odenrick
and Brattström19 found increased root
resorption prior to, and after, orthodontic
treatment in nail-biters. This could be
attributed to increased pressures on the
periodontium for sustained periods. This
may also be true of digit habits.
Tooth type and series
The teeth that most commonly
undergo root resorption, as a consequence
of orthodontic treatment, are the maxillary
lateral incisors and the maxillary central
incisors, followed by the mandibular
incisors and the distal root of the first
permanent molars.1,20 Sameshima and
Sinclair12 found that OIIRR affected single-
rooted teeth to a greater extent (Figure
6). This is confirmed in the investigations
by Mirabella and Årtun3 who found a
relationship between the amount of
resorption and increased tooth length and
reduced tooth width, thus the lateral incisor
having a narrow width would be more
susceptible.
Root form and morphology
In 1988, Levander and
Malmgren suggested that the degree
of root resorption in teeth with blunt or
pipette-shaped roots was significantly
higher than in teeth with normal root
lengths (Figure 7)7. However, more
recently, from a systematic review of
relevant randomized trials, Weltman
and co-workers1 have been unable to
demonstrate an association between teeth
with roots of unusual morphology and
increased susceptibility to moderate and
severe root resorption.
Dental anomalies
Associations between anomalies
of dental form and root resorption have
Figure 4. Categories of root resorption modified from Levander and Malmgren.7
Figure 5. Extensive external and internal root
resorption in a patient with hyperparathyroidism.
Orthodontic Update
105
October 2010
long been suspected because of the
polygenic inheritance patterns of these
anomalies and the heritability of external
apical root resorption. Investigations into
the association of dental anomalies, such
as developmentally absent teeth, peg-
shaped or diminutive lateral incisor, dens
invaginatus, taurodontism, ectopic eruption
and abnormally short-rooted teeth with
increased OIIRR, have revealed that there
are no statistically significant differences
with control groups.21
Trauma
It has been reported that
movement of teeth which have undergone
a traumatic injury, including those which
are endodontically treated, previously
avulsed or luxated, suffer a greater
frequency of root resorption.22–23 The
types of root resorption most frequently
associated with such teeth are progressive
inflammatory resorption and replacement
resorption (ankylosis). Malmgren et al24
reported that teeth that have undergone
slight or moderate trauma, and where the
periodontal ligament is intact, are not at a
greater risk of root resorption as a result of
orthodontic treatment. This is supported
by more recent studies.25–26 There is even a
suggestion that there may be a ’protective
effect of endodontically treated teeth
with possibly less OIIRR.3,27 Interestingly,
those traumatized teeth which show root
resorption prior to treatment tend to
undergo more resorption during treatment.
The evidence linking previous trauma (with
no signs of root resorption) and unusual
root morphology with root resorption
during orthodontic treatment is weak.
Conclusions
This first article has discussed
patient-related factors which may be
associated with orthodontically-induced
inflammatory root resorption. It highlights
the need for good patient assessment
and family history as there does appear
to be convincing evidence of a genetic
susceptibility to OIIRR, but individual
variation makes it difficult to predict the
likelihood or extent of root resorption
that might arise as a result of orthodontic
treatment. It is therefore important to try
and identify those factors which might
contribute to root resorption in order
to minimize their potential effect, and
patients must be advised of the risk of root
resorption before starting treatment, as
part of the process of informed consent.
The second article will outline
the current evidence on the effects of
different orthodontic treatment mechanics
on the susceptibility and extent of OIIRR.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Scott
Deacon for the use of his images for Figure
References
1. Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker
S, Kaizar EE. Root resorption associated
with orthodontic tooth movement:
a systematic review. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop ???? 137(4): 462–
476; discussion 12A.
2. Linge BO, Linge L. Apical root
resorption in upper anterior teeth. Eur J
Orthod 1983; 5(3): 173–183.
3. Mirabella AD, Artun J. Prevalence
and severity of apical root resorption
of maxillary anterior teeth in adult
orthodontic patients. Eur J Or thod
1995; 17(2): 93–99.
4. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A.
Orthodontically induced inflammatory
root resorption. Part I: The basic
science aspects. Angle Orthod 2002;
72(2): 175–179.
5. Kaley J, Phillips C. Factors related to
root resorption in edgewise practice.
Angle Orthod 1991; 61(2): 125–132.
6. Sharpe W, Reed B, Subtelny JD, Polson
A. Orthodontic relapse, apical root
resorption, and crestal alveolar bone
levels. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1987; 91(3): 252–258.
7. Levander E, Malmgren O. Evaluation
of the risk of root resorption during
orthodontic treatment: a study of
Figure 6. Average root resorption per tooth over a course of orthodontic treatment in 868 patients
(Sameshima and Sinclair, 200112).
Figure 7. DPT demonstrating pipette-shaped and blunted roots of the upper central and lateral incisor
teeth.
106
Orthodontic Update October 2010
upper incisors. Eur J Orthod 1988; 10(1):
30–38.
8. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A.
Orthodontically induced inflammatory
root resorption. Part II: The clinical
aspects. Angle Orthod 2002; 72(2): 180–
184.
9. Hendrix I, Carels C, Kuijpers-Jagtman
AM, Van THM. A radiographic study
of posterior apical root resorption in
orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105(4): 345–
349.
10. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Boyd RL. Apical root
resorption in orthodontically treated
adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1996; 110(3): 311–320.
11. Kjaer I. Morphological characteristics of
dentitions developing excessive root
resorption during orthodontic treatment.
Eur J Orthod 1995; 17(1): 25–34.
12. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting
and preventing root resorption: Part
I. Diagnostic factors. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119(5): 505–
510.
13. McNab S, Battistutta D, Taverne A,
Symons AL. External apical root
resorption of posterior teeth in
asthmatics after orthodontic treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;
116(5): 545–551.
14. Poumpros E, Loberg E, Engstrom C.
Thyroid function and root resorption.
Angle Orthod 1994; 64(5): 389–393;
discussion 94.
15. Goultschin J, Nitzan D, Azaz B. Root
resorption. Review and discussion. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982; 54(5):
586–590.
16. Midgett RJ, Shaye R, Fruge JF, Jr. The
effect of altered bone metabolism on
orthodontic tooth movement. Am J
Orthod 1981; 80(3): 256–262.
17. Harris EF, Kineret SE, Tolley EA. A
heritable component for external apical
root resorption in patients treated
orthodontically. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1997; 111(3): 301–309.
18. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM.
Contemporary Orthodontics. Mosby:
Elsevier, 2007: pp. 331–358.
19. Odenrick L, Brattstrom V. Nailbiting:
frequency and association with root
resorption during orthodontic treatment.
Br J Orthod 1985; 12(2): 78–81.
20. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption
after orthodontic treatment: Part 2.
Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1993; 103(2): 138–146.
21. Lee RY, Artun J, Alonzo TA. Are dental
anomalies risk factors for apical root
resorption in orthodontic patients? Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Or thop 1999; 116(2):
187–195.
22. Goldson L, Henrikson CO. Root resorption
during Begg treatment; a longitudinal
roentgenologic study. Am J Orthod 1975;
68(1): 55–66.
23. Hines FB, Jr. A radiographic evaluation
of the response of previously avulsed
teeth and partially avulsed teeth to
orthodontic movement. Am J Orthod
1979; 75(1): 1–19.
24. Malmgren O, Goldson L, Hill C, Orwin A,
Petrini L, Lundberg M. Root resorption
after orthodontic treatment of
traumatized teeth. Am J Orthod 1982;
82(6): 487–491.
25. Brin I, Tulloch JF, Koroluk L, Philips C.
External apical root resorption in Class
II malocclusion: a retrospective review
of 1– versus 2-phase treatment. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Or thop 2003; 124(2):
151–156.
26. Mandall N, Lowe C, Worthington H,
Sandler J, Derwent S, Abdi-Oskouei
M et al. Which orthodontic archwire
sequence? A randomized clinical trial. Eur
J Orthod 2006; 28(6): 561–566.
27. Remington DN, Joondeph DR, Artun
J, Riedel RA, Chapko MK. Long-term
evaluation of root resorption occurring
during orthodontic treatment. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Or thop 1989; 96(1):
43–46.
... The shape of the radiographic apex/root end may be affected by root end resorption, for example stemming from chronic inflammation or orthodontic tooth movement, which can result in blunting of the apex. 24 If a significant length of root end has been lost, a pseudo open apex may be present, increasing endodontic complexity and if sizeable, may need managed as an open apex case. Generally, if a file or gutta percha tip of a size 50 does not bind (friction fit) at the working length, the case can be considered as an open apex and obturation using a mineral trioxide-based material is preferable. ...
Article
This report presents an interesting case of idiopathic external apical root resorption (IEARR) affecting the non-occluding teeth in a 20-year-old Caucasian male patient with a Class III malocclusion. A review of the current literature is reported and the presenting features of the patient are discussed. Clinical Relevance: Root resorption evident prior to treatment can impact on the possibility of orthodontic treatment. This interesting case highlights a clinical need for treatment and also that root resorption can occur without active orthodontic forces.
Article
This systematic review evaluated root resorption as an outcome for patients who had orthodontic tooth movement. The results could provide the best available evidence for clinical decisions to minimize the risks and severity of root resorption. Electronic databases were searched, nonelectronic journals were hand searched, and experts in the field were consulted with no language restrictions. Study selection criteria included randomized clinical trials involving human subjects for orthodontic tooth movement, with fixed appliances, and root resorption recorded during or after treatment. Two authors independently reviewed and extracted data from the selected studies on a standardized form. The searches retrieved 921 unique citations. Titles and abstracts identified 144 full articles from which 13 remained after the inclusion criteria were applied. Differences in the methodologic approaches and reporting results made quantitative statistical comparisons impossible. Evidence suggests that comprehensive orthodontic treatment causes increased incidence and severity of root resorption, and heavy forces might be particularly harmful. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption is unaffected by archwire sequencing, bracket prescription, and self-ligation. Previous trauma and tooth morphology are unlikely causative factors. There is some evidence that a 2 to 3 month pause in treatment decreases total root resorption. The results were inconclusive in the clinical management of root resorption, but there is evidence to support the use of light forces, especially with incisor intrusion.
Article
Orthodontic movement, as documented in this study, can be accomplished successfully in the case of completely avulsed and partially avulsed teeth which have been reimplanted. These teeth respond to normal orthodontic forces and duration of treatment time by conventional orthodontic techniques and retention. Apical root resorption does occur more readily in these teeth before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Six of the eighty-one involved teeth were lost because of complete root dissolution. The involved teeth which were reimplanted immediately without pulpal treatment and their integrity protected as living tissue were successfully treated orthodontically with no known losses as of this writing. It will be interesting to observe the tissue response of these avulsed teeth in the years ahead. How will time and circumstances deal with these teeth?
Article
Forty-two patients consecutively treated by the Begg method, all of whose first premolars had been extracted before orthodontic treatment, were examined roentgenologically by an intraoral technique on three to four occasions. The examinations were made before treatment, during treatment (before uprighting of tipped teeth), after completion of treatment, and 6 months after completion of treatment.In order to determine the occurrence and degree of root resorptions during the treatment period, a root resorption index was constructed. The reproducibility of the resorption index was studied by two observers.For assessment of the incidence and degree of root resorptions, the series of roentgenograms from each patient were examined simultaneously. The reproducibility of the simultaneous evaluation was also studied.In all of the forty-two cases treated, root resorption was recorded in the last roentgenologic examination.Before treatment small resorptions were found in 4 per cent of the teeth. Already, before uprighting of the tipped teeth, irregular root contours (score 1), probably caused by resorptions, and resorptions < 2 mm. (score 3) were recorded for 25 per cent and 31 per cent, respectively, of the teeth. There was no visible resorption in 42 per cent of the teeth.At the completion of treatment resorption < 2 mm. (score 3) predominated with 48 per cent, resorption of 2 mm.—one third of the root (score 5) occurred in 3 per cent, and no visible resorption occurred in 23 per cent of the teeth.When analyzing the percentage distribution of different degrees of root resorption in the teeth examined, we found that the relatively high frequency of root resorption before uprighting of tipped teeth increased slightly at completion of treatment. The resorption increased more for the upper central incisors, which were subjected to root torque, than for the upper lateral incisors.The incidence of root resorption 6 months after completion of treatment was highest at the lower central incisors (95 per cent). The upper central and lateral incisors showed an incidence of 90 and 87 per cent, respectively, and the lower and upper canines showed an incidence of 79 and 72 per cent, respectively. The lower premolars showed the lowest incidence of root resorption (53 per cent).The teeth that exhibited root resorption prior to treatment developed more resorption than the average during orthodontic treatment. This was especially marked for the upper incisors.
Article
In a series of 200 consecutively debanded patients receiving comprehensive orthodontic treatment with the edgewise appliance, six (3%) showed severe resorption (greater than one-quarter of the root length) of both maxillary central incisors. For other teeth, resorption of this extent occurred in less than 1% of the patients. Using a case-control design, the characteristics of 21 patients with severe resorption were compared to randomly selected controls from the case series. There were significantly more Class III patients among the severe resorption cases than would have been expected. Risk indicators for resorption that were related to treatment procedures included approximation of the maxillary incisor roots against the lingual cortical plate (odds ratio 20), maxillary surgery (odds ratio 8), and root torque (odds ratio 4.5).
Article
The present study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term status of teeth that had undergone root resorption during active orthodontic treatment. A total of 100 patients who exhibited root resorption during appliance therapy were recalled at a mean period of 14.1 years (SD 0.4) after treatment. At those examinations full-mouth sets of periapical radiographs were taken and tooth mobility evaluated. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and long-term periapical radiographs were examined and compared for changes in root length and contour with time. At each stage scores were given on a scale from 0 to 4, depending on the degree of resorption. The maxillary incisors were affected more frequently and to a greater degree than the rest of the teeth during active treatment. The long-term evaluation showed no apparent changes after appliance removal except remodeling of rough and sharp edges. Hypermobility was observed in only two instances.
Article
The purpose of the study was to investigate the risk of severe apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in relation to resorption after initial treatment, 6–9 months; and in relation to apical root form. The risk of severe apical root resorption in relation to resorption after 6–9 months of treatment was studied on 390 upper incisors in 98 consecutive patients (55 boys, 43 girls). Intra-oral radiographs before treatment, after 6–9 months and after treatment were evaluated. The importance of the root form (normal, short, blunt, apically bent, pipette shaped) for root resorption was studied on 610 upper incisors in 153 patients (75 boys, 78 girls). Intra-oral radiographs before and after treatment were evaluated. Treatment was performed with an edgewise or a Begg technique and lasted from 11 to 29 months. An index from 0 to 4 (Fig. 1) was used for the evaluation of the degree of root resorption. Root resorption after treatment was significantly related to the resorption after the initial 6–9 months. The results indicate a risk of severe resorption in teeth with minor resorptions after 6–9 months. Even an irregular root contour after 6–9 months indicates a risk of severe resorption. No-severe resorption was found after treatment in teeth without resorption after 6–9 months. The degree of root resorption in teeth with blunt or pipette shaped roots was significantly higher than in teeth with a normal root form.
Article
This investigation examined the relationship of postorthodontic treatment relapse to crestal alveolar bone support and root resorption. Thirty-six persons having completed the retention phase of orthodontics at least 10 years earlier were divided into two groups based on the amount of relapse crowding of the mandibular anterior teeth. Eighteen subjects (relapse group) exhibited 2 mm or more of mandibular anterior relapse crowding and 18 subjects (nonrelapse group) exhibited no mandibular anterior relapse crowding. At time of recall, full-mouth series of periapical and bitewing radiographs were obtained as well as lateral cephalometric films to allow comparison with similar lateral cephalometric films obtained at pretreatment and retention time points. The radiographs were examined to assess three parameters: root resorption, crestal alveolar bone levels, and changes in the position and angulation of the maxillary incisors. The subjects in the relapse group had undergone longer periods of treatment and exhibited a greater prevalence of root resorption; they also displayed significantly greater crestal alveolar bone level distances, indicating greater loss of bone support than that observed in the nonrelapse group. The distances that teeth were translated seemed to affect the extent of root resorption and crestal bone loss with smaller amounts of tooth translation seemingly more prone to demonstrate tissue loss. The findings of this investigation suggest there may be a relationship between orthodontic relapse and the parameters of increased root resorption and decreased crestal alveolar bone levels.
Article
The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the incidence and intensity of nailbiting and its possible role in root resorption during orthodontic treatment. A sample of 1365 boys and girls, aged 13–15 years old, were investigated about their nailbiting habits. The possible effect of nailbiting on root resorption during orthodontic treatment was evaluated by radiographic examination of two groups, matched with regard to overjet, age, sex, length and type of orthodontic treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances, one group consisting of 21 severe nailbiters and the other a group of 21 patients without the habit. Replies to questionnaires distributed to 340 boys and girls showed that the incidence of nailbiting was 45 per cent. The habit of severe nailbiting among 1025 of the children investigated was registered in 14·3 per cent. There was no significant difference regarding the habit between boys and girls. The apical root resorption index was significantly higher in the severe nailbiters before ( p<0·01) and after ( p<0·001) orthodontic treatment.
Article
The incidence and extent of apical root resorption in maxillary incisors were studied radiographically in 719 consecutively treated orthodontic patients. Mean age at start of treatment was 12.8 years and mean observation time 3.6 years in both sexes. Root lengths were measured to the nearest 1/10 mm on standardized intra-oral radiographs taken before and after treatment. Mean root shortening for the four incisors were 0.73 mm and 0.67 mm for girls and boys respectively. When using the most severe single root resorption per patient as a parameter the mean was 1.34 mm for both sexes. A statistical search for clinical risk factors in apical root resorption indicated that patients starting treatment after 11 years of age experienced significantly more root resorption than patients starting earlier, even when taking residual root growth into account. Highly significant risk factors were: previous trauma, the correction of impacted maxillary canines, the use of rectangular archwires and Class II elastics. Fixed appliances caused significantly more apical root resorption than removable appliances. Sex, overbite, overjet and the length of time with bands on the teeth were not closely related to the amount of apical root resorption.
Article
The purpose of this study was to determine how bone remodeling changes induced by nutritional hyperparathyroidism affect tooth movement through alveolar bone. Twelve beagle dogs, approximately 1 year old, were randomly divided into two groups of six. The controls were fed a standard dog diet (calcium 0.54 percent, phosphorus 0.42 percent). The experimental diet was identical to that fed the controls except for a decrease in the calcium (0.12 percent) to phosphorus (1.20 percent) ratio. At the tenth week of diet administration, following extraction of the lower third premolars, the second and fourth premolars were moved toward each other with a reciprocal elastic force of 100 Gm. Twelve weeks later the animals were killed and the mandibles were prepared for laboratory evaluation, which included Paragon 1301 staining of undecalcified sections, scanning electron microscopy, and a bone ash analysis. Radioimmunoassays during the experiment showed that the test animals had significantly elevated levels of parathyroid hormone, indicating a probable state of hyperparathyroidism. The clinical data revealed more rapid tooth movement in the experimental animals. Laboratory data indicated that the hyperparathyroid animals had significantly decreased bone density, as well as bone remodeling changes consistent with high PTH levels. These findings suggest that, in addition to applied force, tooth movement is dependent upon the state of calcium metabolism in alveolar bone.