The study presents not only the definition of income convergence and its classification
according to the nature of the analysed economic phenomenon, research method
used, extent of the study and the place of income convergence in selected growth theories,
but also the characteristics of various methods used to explore income convergence
as well as a comparative analysis of the empirical results obtained.
The analyses is concentrated on the EU member states which comprise a relatively
homogenous group of objects in terms of socio-economic development, characterised
by similar propensities to save, fertility, capital depreciation rates and levels of technology.
The time span covers the years 1995–2006. The data used for the purpose of the
study has been sourced mostly from The Conference Board and Groningen Growth and
Development Centre, Total Economy Database, supported by the World Oeconomic
Outlook and Eurostat’s databases.
The empirical evidence leads to an unambiguous conclusion that in the years
1993–2006 the EU member states experienced an absolute β income convergence. The
rate of convergence of the real GDP per capita was equal to 3.83% annually and the
convergence half-time approached 18 years. It is noteworthy, however, that the economic
transition in new members states and their integration with the “old” EU member
states – which involved more freedom of mobility of new technology, capital, goods,
products and labour – not only affected the higher evaluation of convergence rate as
compared to the results obtained by other authors but may also significantly shorten the
full time period of convergence. This conclusion seems to be supported by the results of
the marginal horizontal β convergence, both in its forward and backward approach.
The results of the conditional β convergence based on the equation estimated for
a selected subgroup of less developed countries (including the new EU member states
next to Portugal, Spain and Greece), where the competitive effect calculated by means
of the shift-share method was used as an additional explanatory variable, indicate
nearly the same income convergence rate as the results obtained for this group of countries
by means of the absolute β income convergence analysis. Different results, however,
are delivered by the conditional convergence approach when the differences between
individual economies related to their ITC expenditure are taken into account. In
that case an increase in the convergence half-time is observed.
The hypothesis about the real convergence in the EU member states is supported
also by the results generated by the absolute γ income convergence analysis and by the
dispersion and concentration measures. The use of the methods of analysis of stochastic
processes provides yet other evidence to support the existing view about a relatively
significant ambiguity of those results both in relation to the method and the type of the
unit root test used. It should be noted, however, that the evidence supporting the existence
of the convergence phenomenon is provided more frequently by the KwiatINCOME
CONVERGENCE IN EU MEMBER STATES ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
268
kowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin test rather than the Dickey-Fuller and the augmented
Dickey-Fuller tests.
The evaluation of the real convergence by means of the vertical marginal β convergence
method reveals that Estonia and Latvia have contributed to the income convergence
in the European Union whereas Poland and Lithuania have had a negative
impact on the speed of convergence. In the case of the vertical marginal σ convergence,
negative impact was reported for Portugal, Latvia, Poland and Slovenia in 1993.
In 2006 this group excluded Latvia, and Portugal’s impact was much weaker. It should
also be mentioned that in all those four approaches using the Mt, t + 1 measure, real convergence
in the EU member states was observed for the entire 1993–2006 period.
The obtained results may serve not only as indications for policy makers in relation
to the cohesion of the EU member states but also as a sound foundation for further
efforts concerning income convergence oriented at the diagnosis of the effects of the
crises and recessions on the convergence of socio-economic development in the EU
member states. It is also noteworthy to observe that the findings of the income convergence
analysis, particularly those of methodological character, may become indications
for the enhancement of the existing growth models and may set the development directions
for new research methods to be used in the analysis of this phenomenon.