Content uploaded by Harry A. Atwater
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Harry A. Atwater
Content may be subject to copyright.
Microphotonic parabolic light directors fabricated by two-photon
lithography
J. H. Atwater, P. Spinelli, E. Kosten, J. Parsons, C. Van Lare et al.
Citation: Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 151113 (2011); doi: 10.1063/1.3648115
View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3648115
View Table of Contents: http://apl.aip.org/resource/1/APPLAB/v99/i15
Published by the American Institute of Physics.
Related Articles
One-way cloak based on nonreciprocal photonic crystal
Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 151112 (2011)
Microfabricated optofluidic ring resonator structures
Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 141108 (2011)
Enhanced coupling between light and surface plasmons by nano-structured Fabry–Pérot resonator
J. Appl. Phys. 110, 066102 (2011)
Note: A high transmission Faraday optical isolator in the 9.2 m range
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 096106 (2011)
Optical method for measuring thermal accommodation coefficients using a whispering-gallery microresonator
J. Chem. Phys. 135, 084313 (2011)
Additional information on Appl. Phys. Lett.
Journal Homepage: http://apl.aip.org/
Journal Information: http://apl.aip.org/about/about_the_journal
Top downloads: http://apl.aip.org/features/most_downloaded
Information for Authors: http://apl.aip.org/authors
Downloaded 18 Oct 2011 to 131.215.237.232. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
Microphotonic parabolic light directors fabricated by two-photon lithography
J. H. Atwater,
1,a)
P. Spinelli,
1
E. Kosten,
2
J. Parsons,
1
C. Van Lare,
1
J. Van de Groep,
1
J. Garcia de Abajo,
3
A. Polman,
1
and H. A. Atwater
2
1
Center for Nanophotonics, FOM-Institute AMOLF, Science Park 104, Amsterdam 1098XG, The Netherlands
2
Thomas J. Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena,
California 91125, USA
3
IO-CSIC, Serrano 121, Madrid 28006, Spain
(Received 8 August 2011; accepted 20 September 2011; published online 13 October 2011)
We have fabricated microphotonic parabolic light directors using two-photon lithography, thin-film
processing, and aperture formation by focused ion beam lithography. Optical transmission
measurements through upright parabolic directors 22 lm high and 10 lm in diameter exhibit strong
beam directivity with a beam divergence of 5.6
!
, in reasonable agreement with ray-tracing and
full-field electromagnetic simulations. The results indicate the suitability of microphotonic
parabolic light directors for producing collimated beams for applications in advanced solar cell and
light-emitting diode designs.
V
C
2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3648115]
Planar micro- and nano-fabrication has enabled the fab-
rication of a wide array of planar integrated microphotonic
components, including mirrors,
1–3
lenses,
4
splitters,
5
array
waveguide grating filters,
6
and other integrated compone nts.
7
Microphotonic components which control of out-of-plane
beam propagation have been designed using planar fabrica-
tion methods, such as Bragg mirrors for use in conjunction
with vertical cavity surface emitting lasers.
8
Recently, plas-
monic out-of-plane beam steering and focusing structures
9–11
have also been designed using planar fabrication methods. In
many cases, however, the direct fabrication of three-
dimensional microphotonic components offers greater design
flexibility for out-of-plane beam control.
Direct laser write lithography is a promising method to
fabricate three dimensional micro- and nano- photonic struc-
tures.
12
It has previously been used for fabrication of three
dimensional nanophotonic components such as infrared and
optical frequency metamaterials,
13
but less attention has
been devoted to design of three dimension microphotonic
components for beam opt ics. Three dimensional structure
fabrication by direct laser writing takes advantage of the
ability to expose a well-defined nanoscale voxel using two-
photon processes that occur at the waist of a tightly focused
infrared beam in a photosensitive resist medium.
In this paper, we report the fabrication of three dimen-
sional microphotonic parabolic beam directors in the form of
compound parabolic concentrators via direct laser write li-
thography. Microphotonic parabolic light directors employ the
well-known focusing properties of compound parabolic con-
centrators, which have previously only been fabricated at the
macroscopic scale.
14–16
Arrays of microphotonic compound
parabolic concentrator structures could be used in low-profile
format on top of solid-state photonic devices for a wide vari-
ety of optoelectronic applications such as collimation of light
emitted from light-emitting diodes or improving the efficiency
of solar cells by collimating the collected light in order to
reduce the entropy changes associated with light emission.
17
In order to create three-dimensional compound para-
bolic concentrator structures which redirect transmitted light,
a Nanoscribe photonic professional two-photon lithography
system was used.
18
The lithography system focuses an
expanded 785 nm laser beam to a diffraction-limited spot at
a point where it catalyzes a chemical change in a photoresist
(IP-L). This allows the user to write a single voxel instead of
a column, allowing three-dimensional structures to be writ-
ten. During fabrication, a glass substrate coated with opt ical
coupling fluid on one side to facilitate index matching and
IP-L two photon negative photoresist on the other is placed
at the beam focus and the structure is written in the exposed
IP-L by moving the glass substrate. The exposed resist is
then developed in 2-propanol, a process during which all
unwritten IP-L and all optical coupling fluid is disso lved. Af-
ter development, only the parabolic structures bonded to the
glass substrate remained. The structures are then coated with
FIG. 1. (a) SEM image of array of parabolic reflectors coated with silver;
(b) SEM image of single paraboloid; (c) plan view of single paraboloid with
light transmission aperture visible at bottom center; and (d) close up of light
aperture etched with a focused ion beam.
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail:
jhatwater@gmail.com.
0003-6951/2011/99(15)/151113/3/$30.00
V
C
2011 American Institute of Physics99, 151113-1
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 99, 151113 (2011)
Downloaded 18 Oct 2011 to 131.215.237.232. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
20 nm of chromium and 380 nm of silver using a plasma
sputter coater. Following metal coating, optical apertures
with diameters 0.7, 1.1, and 1.3 lm were etched into the bot-
toms of the paraboloids using focused ion beam lithography.
The end result is an array of micron-scale, silver-surfaced
three-dimensional parabolic structures anchored to a silver-
coated substrate at the base of the paraboloids.
During the process of creating microphotonic parabolic
structures, several discoveries regarding optimum write tech-
niques were made. Paraboloids written with a wall thickness
of 1 voxel (approximately 80-100 nm) were found to be
unstable during post-exposure processing. To overcome this
problem, paraboloids with thicker walls were fabricated by
writing five overlapping paraboloids consisting of a center
paraboloid and four others offset in the x and y directions by
þ/#250 nm. The thickness of the metal films used to coat the
paraboloids was also found to be an important parameter. In
fact, thin Ag films yielded a non-uniform coating of the
parabolas from top to bottom, resulting in significant losses
of light due to partial transparency of the metal film at the
bottom. Thick Ag films, on the other hand, resulted in
increased roughness on the inside and outside walls. The opti-
mal Ag thickness was found to be between 150 and 380 nm.
Figure 1(a) is an electron micrograph of silver-coated
22 lm high parabolic light directors spaced by 50 lm. Figure
1(b) is an enlarged view of a single paraboloid which illus-
trates the paraboloid wall thickness resulting from the over-
lap of exposed voxels in the writing process, visible as
concentric rings on the paraboloid, as well as the additional
surface roughness associated with the silver coating. Figure
1(c) is a top view of a single paraboloid that illustrates the
1.3 lm wide light aperture visible at the bottom center of the
structure. At the rim of the paraboloid, the wall thickness is
evident, as are the ripples created by the overlap of exposed
voxels during the multiple write process used to thicken the
paraboloid walls. Figure 1(d) is an enlarged view of the light
aperture which was etched in the bottom of the paraboloid
with focused ion beam nanolithography. It indicates that the
depth of the light aperture hole is approximately 1 lm and
extends into the glass layer.
Optical transmission measurements were performed on
parabolic light directors and reference apertures in the metal-
coated planar substrate with the same size as the ones in the
paraboloids. The light source was a broadband supercontin-
uum laser with approximately uniform intensity in the
spectral range between 450 nm and 1500 nm. A single-
wavelength source from an Ar ion laser operated at
k ¼ 514 nm was also used to study the emission of monochro-
matic light. Paraboloids and reference apertures were illumi-
nated from below through the glass substrate using a 25%
microscope objective with NA ¼ 0.5. The excitation spot was
FIG. 2. (Color online) Optical transmission images taken at different
heights for parabolic reflector and 1.3 lm reference aperture etched into sub-
strate 100 lm away with 20 x objective NA ¼ 0.75. Images (a)–(e): Parabo-
loid images with objective at heights z ¼ 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 lm above
the substrate. Images (f)–(j): Reference aperture images with objective at
heights z ¼ 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 lm above the substrate.
FIG. 3. (Color online) Directivity of transmission for parabolic light direc-
tors and reference apertures. FWHM of optical intensity profiles versus
objective lens height from transmission images taken at different heights for
parabolic reflector (red curve, at left) and reference aperture (blue curve, at
right). Dashed line indicates beam divergence half-angle from predictions of
ray tracing simulations. Solid line is the divergence half-angle obtained
from boundary element method full wave simulations.
151113-2 Atwater et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 151113 (2011)
Downloaded 18 Oct 2011 to 131.215.237.232. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions
defocused to uniformly illuminate both the paraboloids and
the reference apertures. Images were taken from the top with
a 20% microscope objective with numerical aperture
NA ¼ 0.75 and a working distance of 1 mm. Figure 2 shows
514 nm intensity images taken at heights above the substrate
surface ranging from z ¼ 0–100 lm, for light transmitted
through a paraboloid with a 1.3 lm aperture (panels (a)–(e))
and through a reference 1.3 lm aperture in the substrate (pan-
els (f)–(j)). Care was taken to record an unsaturated image at
the z ¼ 0 position in Figs. 2(a) and 2(f), and identical illumi-
nation conditions were maintained for Figs. 2(b)–2(e) and
2(g)–2(j) as the distance between the substrate and objective
was varied. These images illustrate the ability of paraboloids
to collimate light transmitted through the 1.3 lm aperture in
the bottom into a tight beam in the far field. These results
clearly indicate that the microphotonic paraboloid light direc-
tors can be used to create collimate beams from micron-scale
optical apertures.
Figure 3 shows a plot of the full width half maximum
(FWHM) profile obtained from line cuts at the center of the
spots shown in Fig. 2 as a function of height above the sub-
strate. The red curve corresponds to the FWHM of the spot
imaged above the paraboloids while the blue curve corre-
sponds to the FWHM of the spot imaged above reference
aperture. The black dashed line in Figure 3 corresponds to
the 5.6
!
angular spread of light emitted from the paraboloids
predicted by ray tracing calculations. The black solid line
represents the emission angle obtained from boundary ele-
ment method (BEM) calculations. Single-wavelength trans-
mission measurements were also taken at wavelength
k ¼ 514 nm and showed similar results to those seen from the
white light source in Figs 2 and 3. The data in Fig. 3 clearly
show that the emission of light from the parabola is highly
directional and in good qualitative agreement with ray-
tracing and BEM calculations.
Simulations of the electric field for a dipole emission
from the parabola were made using the boundary element
method. Figure 4 is an image of the calculated electric field
intensity jEj
2
for emissi on from a circularly polarized dipole
situated at the inner bottom of a parabolic silver mirror. The
calculations suggest that the field intensity at the top of the
parabola is quite spatial uniform inside the parabola and
remains confined in a spatially uniform beam up to a height
of approximately 50 lm, in agreement with the results of
Figs. 2(b) and 2(c).
The authors are grateful for technical assistance from G.
Vollenbroek and M. Vrucinic. The Caltech researchers are
supported by the Light-Matter Interactions Energy Frontier
Research Center, an EFRC program of the Office of Science,
United States Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-
SC0001293 (EDK and HAA). Researchers of the Center for
Nanophotonics at AMOLF are supported by the research
program of FOM which is financially supported by NWO.
1
H. Schenk, P. Du¨rr, T. Haase, D. Kunze, U. Sobe, H. Lakner, and H.
Ku¨ck, IEEE J. ST Quantum Electron. 6, 715 (2000).
2
C.-H. Ji and Y.-K. Kim J. Lightwave Technol. 21, 584 (2003).
3
W.-H. Juan and S. W. Pang J. Microelectromech. Syst. 7, 213 (1998).
4
P. Savander, Opt. Lasers Eng. 20, 97 (1994).
5
J. Leuthold and C. H. Joyner, J. Lightwave Technol. 19, 700 (2001).
6
S. Suzuki, Y. Inoue, and Y. Ohmori, Electron. Lett. 30, 642 (1994).
7
T. Tsuchizawa, K. Yamada, H. Fukuda, T. Watanabe, J. Takahashi, M.
Takahashi, T. Shoji, E. Tamechika, S. Itabashi, and H. Morita, IEEE J. ST.
Quantum Electron. 11, 232 (2005).
8
G. Hasnain, K. Tai, L. Yang, Y. H. Wang, R. J. Fischer, J. D. Wynn, B.
Weir, N. K. Dutta, and A. Y. Cho, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27, 1377
(1991).
9
H. J. Lezec, A. Degiron, E. Devaux, R. A. Linke, L. Martin-Moreno, F. J.
Garcia-Vidal, and T. W. Ebbesen, Science 297, 820 (2002).
10
E. Cubukcu, E. A. Kort, K. B. Crozier, and F. Capasso, Appl. Phys. Lett.
89, 093120 (2006).
11
Y. C. Jun, K. C. Y. Huang, and M. L. Brongersma, Nat. Commun. 2, 283
(2011).
12
S. Kawata, H. B. Sun, T. Tanaka, and K. Takada, Nature 412, 697 (2001).
13
M. S. Rill, C. Plet, M. Thiel, I. Staude, G. von Freymann, S. Linden, and
M. Wegener, Nature Mater. 7, 543 (2008).
14
W. T. Welford and R. Winston. High Collection Nonimaging Optics (Aca-
demic, San Diego, 1989).
15
R. Winston, Sol. Energy 16, 89 (1974).
16
R. Winston, Appl. Opt. 15, 291 (1976).
17
E. D. Kosten and H. A. Atwater, Proc. SPIE 8124, 81240F (2011).
18
N. Anscombe, Nature Photon. 4, 22 (2010).
FIG. 4. (Color online) Electric field intensity jE(x,z)j
2
profile at k ¼ 514 nm
for a radial cross section emerging from a Ag parabola illuminated by a
plane wave from bottom. Inset indicates field intensity in vicinity of the pa-
rabola with 1.3 lm diameter aperture.
151113-3 Atwater et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 151113 (2011)
Downloaded 18 Oct 2011 to 131.215.237.232. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://apl.aip.org/about/rights_and_permissions