ArticlePDF Available

Psychiatric profile and attention deficits in postural tachycardia syndrome

Authors:
  • Byrne Research

Abstract and Figures

Patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) often appear anxious and report inattention. Patients with POTS were formally assessed for psychiatric disorders and inattention and compared with patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and control subjects. Patients with POTS (n = 21), ADHD (n = 18) and normal control subjects (n = 20) were assessed for DSM-IV psychiatric disorders and completed a battery of questionnaires that assessed depression, anxiety and ADHD characteristics. Patients with POTS did not have an increased prevalence of major depression or anxiety disorders, including panic disorder, compared with the general population. Patients with POTS had mild depression. They scored as moderately anxious on the Beck Anxiety Inventory but did not exhibit a high level of anxiety sensitivity. Patients with POTS scored significantly higher on inattention and ADHD subscales than control subjects. These symptoms were not present during childhood. Patients with POTS do not have an increased lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders. Although they may seem anxious, they do not have excess cognitive anxiety. They do experience significant inattention which may be an important source of disability.
Content may be subject to copyright.
PSYCHIATRIC PROFILE AND ATTENTION DEFICITS IN
POSTURAL TACHYCARDIA SYNDROME
Vidya Raj, MB ChB1, Kirsten L. Haman, PhD1, Satish R. Raj, MD MSCI2,3, Daniel Byrne,
MS4, Randy D. Blakely, PhD1,3,6, Italo Biaggioni, MD2,3, David Robertson, MD2,3,5,6, and
Richard C. Shelton, MD1,3
1Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
2Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
3Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee,
USA.
4Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
5Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
6Center for Molecular Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville,
Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
Objectives—Patients with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) often appear anxious and report
inattention. We formally assessed patients with POTS for psychiatric disorders and inattention and
compared them to patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and control subjects.
Methods—Patients with POTS (N=21), ADHD (N=18) and normal control subjects (N=20) were
assessed for DSM-IV psychiatric disorders and completed a battery of questionnaires that assessed
depression, anxiety and ADHD characteristics.
Results—Patients with POTS did not have an increased prevalence of major depression or anxiety
disorders, including panic disorder, compared to the general population. Patients with POTS had
mild depression. They scored as moderately anxious on the Beck Anxiety Inventory, but did not
exhibit a high level of anxiety sensitivity. Patients with POTS scored significantly higher on
inattention and ADHD subscales than control subjects. These symptoms were not present during
childhood.
Conclusions—Patients with POTS do not have an increased lifetime prevalence of psychiatric
disorders. Although they may seem anxious, they do not have excess cognitive anxiety. They do
experience significant inattention, which may be an important source of disability.
Search Terms
Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS); Orthostatic Intolerance; Attention; Depression; Anxiety
Corresponding Author & Address for Reprints: Richard C. Shelton MD, Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of
Medicine, 1500 21st Ave., South, Suite 2200, Nashville, TN 37212, USA. Tel: (615) 343-9669 Fax: (615) 343-7868 Email:
Richard.Shelton@vanderbilt.edu.
COMPETING INTERESTS
None.
NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
Published in final edited form as:
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009 March ; 80(3): 339–344. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.144360.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
INTRODUCTION
Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), a disorder that affects an estimated 500,000 people
(~0.18%) in the United States alone, is an important source of disability in young adults.[1] It
shows a strong predilection for females, typically between the ages 20–50 years.[2] POTS is
a form of orthostatic intolerance characterized by an excessive increase in heart rate (>30 bpm)
on assuming the upright position associated with orthostatic symptoms, but in the absence of
orthostatic hypotension.[2–5] Their symptoms of dizziness, nausea, tremor, chronic fatigue
and exercise intolerance make even simple activities of daily living such as walking and bathing
exhausting prospects.[6]
Although the role of noradrenergic dysfunction is unclear, there is significant evidence of
central dysregulation of the noradrenergic system in POTS and an association between
dysregulation of norepinephrine (NE) homeostasis and psychiatric disorders, including
depression, panic disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). [7–9]
Centrally acting drugs that inhibit the pre-synaptic norepinephrine transporter (NET) (e.g.
tricyclic antidepressants, duloxetine, reboxetine, amphetamines and cocaine) produce the
clinical features of POTS.[10–13] Peripheral plasma norepinephrine (NE) is frequently raised
in patients with POTS, particularly when upright, and many clinical features of POTS such as
tachycardia, palpitations, shortness of breath, chest discomfort and tremor mimic the
hyperadrenergic features of a panic attack. In one family, the POTS phenotype segregated with
a heterozygous missense mutation in NET effecting >98% loss of function and elevated plasma
norepinephrine levels. The mutation tracked with POTS characteristics and the probands
complained of inattention.[10] While stimulants used to treat ADHD enhance alertness,
attention and working memory, very high levels of catecholamines disrupt these higher
cognitive functions. This effect can be reversed by α2–adrenoreceptor agonists which reduce
NE release.[9] Together, these findings suggest that the correct balance of central NE activity
is required to maintain normal attention and this could be impaired in POTS.
This cross-sectional controlled study assessed attention, mood, and anxiety symptoms in
patients with POTS and contrasted them with ADHD subjects and psychiatrically normal
control subjects. We tested the following hypotheses:
1. Patients with POTS will report a higher lifetime prevalence of depression and anxiety
disorders, and a higher magnitude of current depression and anxiety symptoms, than
controls and the prevalence will be comparable to subjects with ADHD.
2. Patients with POTS will show significant inattention relative to controls, and similar
to levels shown by subjects with ADHD.
METHODS
Patients and Study Design
The study was approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board and all
participants provided written informed consent prior to the study. Patients with POTS (N=23),
aged 18–65 years, were admitted as research subjects to the Vanderbilt Clinical Research
Center between January 2003 and December 2004. They were referred to Vanderbilt due to a
clinical suspicion of POTS or had received a clinical diagnosis. The diagnosis of POTS was
confirmed with current criteria, which include (1) symptoms of orthostatic intolerance and an
increase in heart rate of 30 beats per minute within 10 minutes of standing from a supine
position, but in the absence of orthostatic hypotension (fall in blood pressure of 20/10 mm
Hg);[2–4] (2) symptoms with standing that improved with recumbence; (3) symptoms had
occurred for at least 6 months; and (4) symptoms had occurred in the absence of other major
medical co-morbidity or another obvious cause of tachycardia (such as acute dehydration).
Raj et al. Page 2
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
None of the subjects were receiving medications which could affect autonomic function during
their admission, including psychotropic drugs. Subjects participated in the seated position and
were not acutely symptomatic during the testing.
Patients with POTS were matched by age, gender and race with 20 psychiatrically healthy
control subjects, who formed a comparison group for the self-report questionnaires used in the
study. They were free of current or lifetime history of DSM-IV [14] Axis I psychiatric disorders
as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID).[15]
Age-matched adults with ADHD (n=18) formed a second comparison group with the POTS
patients, in particular regarding symptoms of inattention and chronic psychiatric illness. All
ADHD patients had been previously diagnosed and treated for ADHD by a psychiatrist or
psychologist. To ensure they currently met criteria, we re-evaluated patients using DSM-IV
diagnostic criteria as recommended by Barkley.[16] All control and ADHD subjects were free
of medical co-morbidities and were not taking psychotropic agents. The control and ADHD
subjects did not receive formal autonomic function testing, but none complained of autonomic
symptoms on screening by a medical doctor (VR), and ADHD subjects did not meet POTS
criteria on testing supine and standing heart rate and blood pressure.
For data on DSM IV axis I diagnoses, subjects with POTS were compared with subjects with
ADHD and data from a large population of respondents (n=9282) to the National Comorbidity
Survey Replication (NCS population norms).[17] Similarly, data on Anxiety Sensitivity Index
score was also compared to published general population normative data.[18]
Measures
Subjects were assessed by a trained research assistant for current and lifetime history of axis
I psychiatric disorders using the SCID. Psychiatric diagnoses were made only if not accounted
for by the presence of a medical disorder. Any diagnostic questions were resolved based on
the consensus opinion of the project clinicians (KLH, RCS). Subjects completed the following
self-report questionnaires (further details are in a supplemental file):
1. The Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) - a well validated screening
questionnaire for depression.[19,20]
2. The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) – a commonly used measure of anxiety severity.
[21]
3. The Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) - assesses fear of anxiety-related symptoms.
[22]
4. The Connors Adult ADHD Rating Scale long form (CAARS-L) - rates items in four
factor domains including inattention/memory problems and hyperactivity/
restlessness.[23]
5. The ADHD Behavior Checklist for Adults (ABC-A) - measures the specific
inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms that comprise the DSM-IV criteria
for ADHD.[24]
Statistical Analysis
Differences among the groups were assessed using Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables
and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables, with a post-hoc Scheffe
multiple comparisons procedure used for pair-wise comparisons. Spearman’s test was
performed to analyze for bivariate correlations. A general linear model with inattention as the
dependent variable and gender, anxiety and depression as fixed factors was used to test for the
influence of potential confounding variables. All tests were two-sided and results were
considered significant if P<0.05. Data were analyzed with SPSS for Windows software, version
Raj et al. Page 3
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
14.0 (SPSS Inc.), and GraphPad Prism software, version 4 (GraphPad Software, San Diego,
Calif.). Results presented are means and standard deviations unless otherwise specified.
RESULTS
Patient Characteristics
One POTS patient declined to participate, reporting she felt too symptomatic. Data collected
on 2 of the 23 patients with POTS were not analyzed due to co-morbid ADHD that pre-dated
the diagnosis of POTS. One control subject was excluded after meeting criteria for a past
diagnosis of major depressive disorder. No ADHD volunteers were excluded. However, 3 of
23 initial subjects failed to participate and 2 subjects failed to complete the study so their data
could not be included. ADHD subjects could not be closely gender-matched with the POTS
patients due to the male bias of ADHD compared to the strong female predominance of POTS.
POTS patients reported mean length of illness from self-reported onset of symptoms as 6.9
±9.2 years. Characterizing data in the POTS subjects is presented in table 1 and baseline
demographic data for each patient group is compared in Table 2:
Groups did not differ significantly in age and education level and there was no difference in
gender distribution between the POTS and control groups. There were more men in the ADHD
group compared with the control group (P=0.027) reflecting the male predominance of ADHD.
All subjects were Caucasian, with the exception of one African-American patient with POTS
who was matched with an African-American control subject.
Prevalence of Mental Disorders
Lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorders in POTS patients and ADHD
subjects are presented in Table 3.
The lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders in patients with POTS was not significantly greater
than NCS population norms (P=0.83) and did not differ significantly from subjects with ADHD
(P=0.34). Subjects with ADHD had a non-significant trend toward a higher prevalence of
anxiety disorders than NCS population norms (P=0.08), including panic disorder (P=0.066).
Amongst anxiety disorders, the prevalence of panic disorder in patients with POTS did not
differ from NCS population norms (P=0.99) or subjects with ADHD (P=0.32).
There was no difference in the lifetime prevalence of major depressive disorder in patients with
POTS compared to NCS population norms (P=0.99). However, there was a higher prevalence
of major depressive disorder in subjects with ADHD compared to patients with POTS
(P=0.024) or NCS population norms (P<0.001).
Finally, the prevalence of substance abuse or dependence in patients with POTS did not differ
significantly from NCS population norms (P=0.73), but was significantly less than in subjects
with ADHD (P=0.025).
Prevalence of Depression Symptoms
The BDI-II score compared the magnitude of current depression symptoms in patients with
POTS, subjects with ADHD and control subjects free of DSM-IV axis I disorders. Patients
with POTS scored as mildly depressed (4.8±8.5). Overall, BDI-II scores differed significantly
among the groups (P< 0.001). Post-hoc analysis showed a significantly higher score in patients
with POTS compared to control subjects (14.8±8.5 vs. 1.4±1.5; P<0.001), and in ADHD
subjects compared to controls (10.7±9.8 vs. 1.4±1.5; P<0.001), but there was no significant
difference between the POTS and ADHD groups (P=0.239). For patients with POTS, there
Raj et al. Page 4
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
was a significant inverse correlation between length of illness and BDI-II score (rs=0.47,
p=0.04). There was no significant correlation of supine, upright or delta NE with BDI-II score
in the POTS group.
Prevalence of Anxiety Symptoms
The BAI compared the magnitude of current anxiety symptoms in the three groups (Figure 1
top). Patients with POTS scored as moderately anxious (22.5±9.8). Overall, BAI scores
differed significantly among the groups (P<0.001). Post-hoc analysis showed a significantly
higher score in patients with POTS compared to control subjects (1.3±1.6; P<0.001), and in
patients with POTS compared to subjects with ADHD (5.9±5.7; P<0.001), but there was no
significant difference between the ADHD and control groups (P=0.115). In the POTS group,
there was no significant correlation between length of illness and BAI score (rs =0.40,
P=0.09). There was also no significant correlation of supine, upright or delta NE with BAI
score in the POTS subjects. The 5 BAI items scoring with highest frequency in the POTS group
compared to the other groups were heart pounding and racing (2.3±0.6), feeling dizzy and
lightheaded (1.8±0.9), numbness and tingling (1.6±0.8), feeling unable to relax (1.5±0.8) and
feeling unsteady (1.5±0.9).
The ASI compared the magnitude of current fear of anxiety-related symptoms in the three
groups (Figure 1 bottom). Overall, ASI scores differed significantly between the groups
(P=0.001). Post-hoc analysis showed a significantly higher ASI score for the POTS patients
(15.4±9.8) than the control group (4.6±4.5; P=0.001), and in subjects with ADHD (11.8±9.7)
compared to controls (P=0.031), but there was no significant difference between the POTS and
ADHD groups (P=0.504). ASI scores for the 3 groups were also compared to the published
general population normative data of 19.1±9.11 (obtained from 12 non-clinical samples
comprising >4500 participants).[18] Patients with POTS experienced a trend toward lower
anxiety sensitivity than the general population (P=0.07), while subjects with ADHD
experienced higher anxiety sensitivity than the general population (P=0.001). As expected, our
psychiatrically normal control subjects experienced significantly less anxiety sensitivity than
the general population (P<0.001).
Among POTS patients, there was a significant inverse correlation between length of illness
and ASI score (rs =0.56, P=0.01).There was no significant correlation of supine, upright or
delta NE with ASI score in the POTS subjects.
Prevalence of Inattention Symptoms
Significant group differences were noted on all 8 CAARS-L subscales. Post-hoc analysis
showed that patients with POTS did not differ significantly from the controls for hyperactivity
(P=0.170), impulsivity (P=0.064), self-concept (P=0.196) and DSM-IV hyperactivity
(P=0.060) subscales, but both groups scored significantly lower than the ADHD group.
Patients with POTS experienced significantly more symptoms than the controls on three
CAARS-L subscales: Inattention/Memory problems (P=0.033), the CAARS-L “DSM-IV
Inattention” score (P<0.001) and the “DSM-IV ADHD” score (P=0.003) (Table 4). They also
scored significantly higher than the controls on the ADHD index (P=0.027). The ADHD group
scored significantly higher than either of the other groups on all CAARS-L subscales.
A general linear model analysis using gender, BDI score and ASI score was used to test for a
possible confounding influence by gender, current depression symptoms and current anxiety
sensitivity on inattention scores. First, using Connors DSM-IV inattention as the dependent
variable, the model showed no statistically significant effect of gender (P=0.307). There was
a statistically significant effect of BDI score (P=0.021) and ASI score (P=0.019), but group
Raj et al. Page 5
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
remained a statistically significant driver of the CAARS-L DSM-IV inattention score
(P<0.001) even when BDI and ASI scores were taken into account. Second, using CAARS-L
ADHD score as the dependent variable, the model showed no statistically significant effect of
gender (P=0.444) or ASI score (P=0.155). There was a statistically significant effect of BDI
score (P=0.005), but group remained a statistically significant driver of the CAARS-L ADHD
score (P<0.001) even when BDI score was taken into account.
In the POTS group, there were statistically significant inverse correlations between length of
illness and the following CAARS-L subscales: inattention/memory score (rs =0.46, P=0.05),
self concept score (rs =0.47, P=0.04), Connors DSM-IV hyperactivity score (rs =0.53,
P=0.02), DSM-IV ADHD score (rs =0.49, P=0.04) and ADHD index (rs =0.52, P=0.02).
There was no significant correlation of supine, upright or delta NE with any of the CAARS-L
subscale scores in subjects with POTS.
Prevalence of ADHD Symptoms in Childhood and Adulthood
Scores on the four ABC-A subscales were compared between the three groups, and data on
inattention are presented graphically in Figure 2. There were significant overall group
differences on all subscales (attention problems in childhood: P<0.001; hyperactivity in
childhood: P<0.001; inattention over the past 6 months: P<0.001; hyperactivity over the past
6 months: P<0.001).
For inattention in childhood, post-hoc analysis showed that patients with POTS (4.8±5.4) had
significantly less childhood symptoms than ADHD subjects (20.2±7.0; P<0.001) and did not
differ significantly from control subjects (2.9±2.6; P=0.499). However, for inattention over
the past six months, patients with POTS (10.7±7.8) had significantly more symptoms than
control subjects (2.2±2.1; P<0.001), but less than ADHD subjects (16.7±7.7; P=0.021).
For hyperactivity in childhood, post-hoc analysis showed that patients with POTS (5.7±6.2)
had significantly less childhood symptoms than ADHD subjects (18.8±9.3; P<0.001) and did
not differ significantly from control subjects (2.5±2.2; P=0.281). For hyperactivity over the
past six months, patients with POTS (7.9±6.6) had significantly more symptoms than control
subjects (1.8±2.0; P=0.007), but less than ADHD subjects (13.7±7.7; P=0.015).
DISCUSSION
Several studies have reported that patients with POTS have co-morbid psychiatric symptoms,
particularly anxiety and panic disorder.[8,25] Using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-
IV Axis I Disorders, we found that there was no significant difference in lifetime prevalence
of major depressive disorder in patients with POTS compared to a general population sample.
[17] Patients with POTS do, however, score as mildly depressed on quantitative measures of
current depression symptoms (BDI). This may reflect living with a chronic medical illness
rather than a phenomenon specific to POTS, as medical illness is commonly associated with
an increased frequency of depressive disorders.[26–28] Certainly, patients with POTS show
limitations across multiple domains of quality of life in common with other chronic medical
illnesses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure.[6] Interestingly,
there is a significant reduction in depressive symptoms (BDI score) as POTS progresses. This
could reflect a reduction in symptom burden over time, or indicate the psychological adjustment
of patients to living with a chronic illness.
Patients with POTS did not experience a significantly increased lifetime prevalence of anxiety
disorders (including panic disorder) compared to a general population sample [17] or subjects
with ADHD. For current anxiety symptoms, patients with POTS scored significantly higher
than controls and ADHD subjects on the BAI, and within the moderate anxiety range. However,
Raj et al. Page 6
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
when using the cognitively focused ASI, patients with POTS did not score higher than the
general population (they actually had a trend toward a lower score), although they still scored
higher than control subjects free of axis I psychiatric disorders. This is supported by the findings
of Masuki et al. who reported that ASI scores in 14 patients with POTS were significantly
higher than in control subjects, but within the limits of published general population data.
[29]
The contrast between the BAI score (moderate anxiety) and the ASI score (comparable to the
general population) in the POTS group is striking. A major difference between the BAI and
ASI is that the former measures both somatic symptoms and subjective anxiety and panic
symptoms on factor analysis, while the latter measures sensitivity to anxiety-provoking stimuli
but not somatic symptoms. Since the orthostatic symptoms experienced by patients with POTS
are similar to the somatic criteria required for the diagnosis of panic attacks or other anxiety
disorders (e.g. palpitations), it is likely that these symptoms, rather than psychological factors,
elevate the BAI scores. Unlike subjects with panic disorder, patients with POTS show several
important clinical differences that can be used to distinguish between the two disorders. These
include predictable precipitants for the onset of somatic symptoms in subjects with POTS (e.g.
dehydration and standing) while patients with panic disorder experience repeated episodes
without a clear precipitant. Further, patients with POTS experience a significant worsening of
somatic symptoms on adoption of the upright position while subjects with panic disorder
typically do not.[30] It is therefore likely that the somatic symptoms in POTS patients do not
represent panic disorder, which is appropriately reflected in the lower ASI score. This finding
is supported by two recent studies. Masuki et al. showed that excessive increase in heart rate
in patients with POTS in response to orthostatic stress is not caused by anxiety.[29] Kharuna
collected data on anxiety and somatic symptoms in response to anxiety-provoking stimuli and
found that symptoms of POTS were distinguishable from symptoms of panic disorder.[31]
Taken together, the evidence suggests that clinically observed anxiety in patients with POTS
is caused by biological rather than psychological factors.
As POTS progresses, there is a significant decrease in ASI score but no significant change in
BAI score. This suggests that there is a diminution in cognitive anxiety symptoms with time,
but not in somatic symptoms.
Our data suggest that patients with POTS experience inattention of a magnitude that is greater
than in controls but less severe than in adult ADHD subjects. Unlike ADHD subjects, patients
with POTS did not report more inattention during childhood. This could indicate a causal role
for POTS in attention difficulties, or suggest that the two problems share common antecedents.
Moreover, this might suggest common genetic underpinnings since noradrenergic gene
products regulate sympathetic tone, cardiac output, and attention. Interestingly, there is a
significant perceived reduction in the magnitude of inattention and ADHD symptoms as POTS
progresses. This could reflect patient adaptations or an improvement in POTS symptoms over
time.
Study Limitations
First, the sample size in this study is relatively small, although it does compare favorably to
other clinical research studies in POTS. It is possible that with a much larger cohort, some of
our non-significant trends might have become significant. Second, whereas psychiatric
diagnoses were evaluated using the gold standard of a structured interview, data on attention
was collected by subjective self-rated questionnaires. While these tools have been well
validated, future studies might benefit from using more objective outcome measures.
Raj et al. Page 7
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Conclusions
Patients with POTS do not have a higher than normal prevalence of anxiety disorders. While
they register with moderate anxiety using somatic assessment tools like the BAI, they have no
more anxiety than the general population using cognitive tools such as the ASI. Similarly,
patients with POTS do not have a significantly increased prevalence of major depression, but
do exhibit mild depressive symptoms. The main abnormality noted in patients with POTS was
difficulty with maintaining attention. These attention difficulties develop later in life, in
contrast to ADHD patients. Further investigation is required in order to identify the etiology
of these problems, and therefore guide clinicians in the selection of targeted treatments.
Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We acknowledge the professional assistance of the staff of the Vanderbilt Clinical Research Center and the research
subjects whose participation made this work possible.
FUNDING
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (Bethesda MD, USA) grants 2P01 HL56693, RO1
NS055670, K23 RR020783, M01 RR00095 & UL1 RR024975.
References List
1. Robertson D. The epidemic of orthostatic tachycardia and orthostatic intolerance. Am.J.Med.Sci
1999;317:75–77. [PubMed: 10037110]
2. Low PA, Opfer-Gehrking TL, Textor SC, et al. Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Neurology
1995;45:S19–S25. [PubMed: 7746369]
3. Raj SR, Black BK, Biaggioni I, et al. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition improves tachycardia in postural
tachycardia syndrome. Circulation 2005;111:2734–2740. [PubMed: 15911704]
4. Raj SR, Biaggioni I, Yamhure PC, et al. Renin-aldosterone paradox and perturbed blood volume
regulation underlying postural tachycardia syndrome. Circulation 2005;111:1574–1582. [PubMed:
15781744]
5. Grubb BP, Kanjwal Y, Kosinski DJ. The postural tachycardia syndrome: a concise guide to diagnosis
and management. J Cardiovasc.Electrophysiol 2006;17:108–112. [PubMed: 16426415]
6. Benrud-Larson LM, Dewar MS, Sandroni P, et al. Quality of life in patients with postural tachycardia
syndrome. Mayo Clin.Proc 2002;77:531–537. [PubMed: 12059122]
7. Harro J, Oreland L. Depression as a spreading adjustment disorder of monoaminergic neurons: a case
for primary implication of the locus coeruleus. Brain Res.Brain Res.Rev 2001;38:79–128. [PubMed:
11750928]
8. Esler M, Alvarenga M, Pier C, et al. The neuronal noradrenaline transporter, anxiety and cardiovascular
disease. J Psychopharmacol 2006;20:60–66. [PubMed: 16785272]
9. Biederman J, Spencer T. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a noradrenergic disorder.
Biol.Psychiatry 1999;46:1234–1242. [PubMed: 10560028]
10. Shannon JR, Flattem NL, Jordan J, et al. Orthostatic intolerance and tachycardia associated with
norepinephrine-transporter deficiency. N.Engl.J Med 2000;342:541–549. [PubMed: 10684912]
11. Robertson D, Flattem N, Tellioglu T, et al. Familial orthostatic tachycardia due to norepinephrine
transporter deficiency. Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci 2001;940:527–543. [PubMed: 11458707]
12. Vincent S, Bieck PR, Garland EM, et al. Clinical assessment of norepinephrine transporter blockade
through biochemical and pharmacological profiles. Circulation 2004;109:3202–3207. [PubMed:
15184278]
Raj et al. Page 8
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
13. Schroeder C, Tank J, Boschmann M, et al. Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibition as a human
model of orthostatic intolerance. Circulation 2002;105:347–353. [PubMed: 11804991]
14. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV. American Psychiatric Association;
1994.
15. First, MB.; Gibbon, M.; Spitzer, RL.; Williams, JBW. User's Guide for the Structured Interview for
DSM–IV Axis I Disorders – Research Version (SCID-I, version 2.0, February 1996 final version).
New York: Biometrics Research; 1996.
16. Barkley, RA. Attention-Deficit Disorder: A Handbook for Diagnosis and Treatment. New York:
Guilford Press; 1998.
17. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-
IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch.Gen.Psychiatry 2005;62:593–
602. [PubMed: 15939837]
18. Peterson, RA.; Reiss, S. Anxiety Sensitivity Index Revised test manual. Worthington, OH: IDS
Publishing Corporation; 1993.
19. Beck, AT.; Steer, RA.; Brown, GK. BDI-II manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation;
1996.
20. Nezu, AM.; Ronan, GF.; Meadows, EA.; McClure, KS. Practitioner's guide to empirically based
measures of depression. Springer: 2000.
21. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, et al. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric
properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:893–897. [PubMed: 3204199]
22. Peterson, RA.; Reiss, S. Anxiety Sensitivity Index Manual. Worthington, OH: International
Diagnostic Systems; 1992.
23. Conners CK. Rating scales in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: use in assessment and treatment
monitoring. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:24–30. [PubMed: 9680050]
24. Barkley, RA. ADHD behavior checklist for adults; The ADHD Report. 1995. p. 16
25. Benrud-Larson LM, Sandroni P, Haythornthwaite JA, et al. Correlates of functional disability in
patients with postural tachycardia syndrome: preliminary cross-sectional findings. Health Psychol
2003;22:643–648. [PubMed: 14640863]
26. Burvill PW, Johnson GA, Jamrozik KD, et al. Prevalence of depression after stroke: the Perth
Community Stroke Study. Br.J.Psychiatry 1995;166:320–327. [PubMed: 7788123]
27. Beck DA, Koenig HG. Minor depression: a review of the literature. Int.J.Psychiatry Med
1996;26:177–209. [PubMed: 8877487]
28. Lindeman S, Hamalainen J, Isometsa E, et al. The 12-month prevalence and risk factors for major
depressive episode in Finland: representative sample of 5993 adults. Acta Psychiatr.Scand
2000;102:178–184. [PubMed: 11008852]
29. Masuki S, Eisenach JH, Johnson C, et al. Excessive Heart Rate Response to Orthostatic Stress in
Postural Tachycardia Syndrome is Not Caused by Anxiety. J Appl Physiol 2006;102:1136–1142.
30. Kanjwal Y, Kosinski D, Grubb BP. The postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: definitions,
diagnosis, and management. Pacing Clin.Electrophysiol 2003;26:1747–1757. [PubMed: 12877710]
31. Khurana RK. Experimental induction of panic-like symptoms in patients with postural tachycardia
syndrome. Clin Auton Res 2006;16:371–377. [PubMed: 16915526]
Raj et al. Page 9
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 1.
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores (top panel) and the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI)
scores (bottom panel) are shown for the healthy control subjects (normals; solid black), patients
with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS; hashed lines), patients with attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; open bar), and published population norms (dark gray). The
overall P value is measured using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the 3 study groups
(not including the published population norms) and paired P values were performed using a
post-hoc Scheffe test. Data are presented as mean ± standard error. The differences between
the 2 anxiety tools may reflect the inclusion of somatic anxiety symptoms in the BAI, whereas
the ASI scores only for cognitive anxiety.
Raj et al. Page 10
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Figure 2.
The ADHD Behavior Checklist for Adults Inattention scores are presented for the 3 groups (as
outlined earlier) during their childhood (left) and during the last 6 months (right). The overall
P value is measured using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the 3 groups and paired P
values were performed using a post-hoc Scheffe test. Data are presented as mean ± standard
error.
Raj et al. Page 11
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Raj et al. Page 12
Table 1
Characterizing Data in Patients with POTS
Characteristic Supine Standing
Heart rate (bpm*)75±12 128±19 bpm
Blood pressure (mm Hg**)108/65±11/8 118/73±19/12 mmHg
NE (pg/ml***)267±98 962±720 pg/ml
POTS – Postural Tachycardia Syndrome. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
*bpm = beats per minute
**mmHg = millimeters Mercury
***pg/ml = picograms per milliliter.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Raj et al. Page 13
Table 2
Demographic Data for Patients with POTS, Normal Controls and ADHD Patients
Characteristic Normals
(N = 20) POTS
(N = 21) ADHD
(N = 18) P value
Age (years) 36.6±11.5 35.9±10.9 41.8±9.1 0.117*
Female, N (%) 18 (90%) 18 (86 %) 10 (56%) 0.022**
Race/Ethnicity – Caucasian N
(%) 19 (95%) 20 (95%) 18 (100%) 0.634**
Education (years) 16.4±3.4 14.3±2.8 14.8±2.6 0.090*
POTS – Postural Tachycardia Syndrome; ADHD – Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
*P value based on one way ANOVA assessing for difference between the groups.
**P value based on Fisher’s exact test for difference between the groups.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Raj et al. Page 14
Table 3
Lifetime Prevalence of Axis I Psychiatric Disorders in POTS Patients and ADHD Subjects
POTS (N=21) ADHD (N=18) Population** (N=9282)
None 8 (38.1%) 5 (25%)*
Major Depressive Disorder 4 (19.0%) 10 (50%) 1541 (16.6%)
Anxiety Disorders 7 (33.3%) 9 (45%) 1639 (28.8%, N=5692)
- Panic Disorder 1 (4.8%) 3 (15%) 436 (4.7%)
Substance abuse/dependence 2 (9.5%) 8 (40%) 1355 (14.6%)
POTS – Postural Tachycardia Syndrome; ADHD – Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
*For ADHD subjects, no other psychiatric disorder.
**Population data from National Comorbidity Survey replication data on the lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV axis I disorders.[17]
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
Raj et al. Page 15
Table 4
CAARS-L Subscale Scores
Subscale Controls
(N=20) POTS
(N=21) ADHD
(N=18) P value*
(POTS vs.
Controls)
P value*
(POTS vs.
ADHD)
Inattention/Memory 43.4±5.4 52.3±11.1 67.5±13.2 0.033 <0.001
DSM-IV Inattention 41.1±7.4 57.7±15.8 73.8±14.5 <0.001 0.001
DSM-IV ADHD 38.1±6.0 52.6±16.1 70.4±15.5 0.003 0.001
ADHD Index 38.9±4.3 46.5±10.3 62.4±12.0 0.027 <0.001
CAARS-L – Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scales-Long version; POTS – Postural Tachycardia Syndrome; ADHD – Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder; DSM-IV – Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
*P values based on post-hoc Scheffe multiple comparisons procedure. P values <0.05 are in bolded text.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 March 1.
... Thus, if cognition is impaired during active standing due to a functional deficit induced by orthostatic stress, then leg crossing might reduce the cognitive impairment. Concerning pathophysiological mechanisms, cerebrovascular mechanisms, such as reduced transcranial perfusion, and an association between sympathetic stress ("hyperarousal") and cognitive deterioration in patients with PoTS , which are exacerbated during standing, have been discussed [3,8,11,18]. ...
... This result is especially interesting in the context of the LPS as a measure of general cognitive ability, which showed no difference between patients with PoTS and HCs. Impaired attention in patients with PoTS was found in other studies in a seated position using Ruff 2 + 7 Speed Test [3], WAIS-III digits forward [8], ADHD subscales [18] and CANTAB [41], and also while standing using CogState [8,9] and TAP subtest for sustained attention [11]. In contrast, recent research found no differences in tonic alertness using the TAP in supine and passive upright positions; however, the sample size was small (PoTS n = 8, only neuropathic PoTS) [42]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Approximately 96% of patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (PoTS) report cognitive complaints. We investigated whether cognitive function is impaired during sitting and active standing in 30 patients with PoTS compared with 30 healthy controls (HCs) and whether it will improve with the counter manoeuvre of leg crossing. Methods: In this prospective pilot study, patients with PoTS were compared to HCs matched for age, sex, and educational level. Baseline data included norepinephrine plasma levels, autonomic testing and baseline cognitive function in a seated position [the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the Leistungsprüfsystem (LPS) subtests 1 and 2, and the Test of Attentional Performance (TAP)]. Cognitive functioning was examined in a randomized order in supine, upright and upright legs crossed position. The primary outcomes were the cognitive test scores between HCs and patients with PoTS at baseline testing, and among the different body positions. Results: Patients with PoTS had impaired attention (TAP median reaction time) in the seated position and impaired executive functioning (Stroop) while standing compared with HC. Stroop was influenced by position (supine versus upright versus upright legs crossed) only in the PoTS group. Leg crossing did not result in an improvement in executive function. In patients with PoTS, there was a negative correlation of Stroop with norepinephrine plasma levels while standing. Conclusion: Compared with HCs, PoTS participants showed impaired cognitive attention and executive function in the upright position that did not improve in the legs crossed position. Data provide further evidence for orthostatic cognitive deterioration in patients with PoTS. Trial registration information: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03681080).
... Additionally, scores on panic symptom inventories are similar for patients with POTS and PD (236). However, whether or not patients with POTS are at a higher risk for PD is contested (236,237). Patients with POTS have several clinical differences that help distinguish it from PD, including known precipitants for symptom onset (dehydration or standing) and worsening symptoms when assuming an upright position (238). POTS is diagnosed by testing to rule out autonomic failure and observation of tachycardia upon posture change (239). ...
Article
Full-text available
Panic disorder is a common psychiatric diagnosis characterized by acute, distressing somatic symptoms that mimic medically-relevant symptoms. As a result, individuals with panic disorder overutilize personal and healthcare resources in an attempt to diagnose and treat physical symptoms that are often medically benign. A biobehavioral perspective on these symptoms is needed that integrates psychological and medical knowledge to avoid costly treatments and prolonged suffering. This narrative review examines six common somatic symptoms of panic attacks (non-cardiac chest pain, palpitations, dyspnea, dizziness, abdominal distress, and paresthesia), identified in the literature as the most severe, prevalent, or critical for differential diagnosis in somatic illness, including long COVID. We review somatic illnesses that are commonly comorbid or produce panic-like symptoms, their relevant risk factors, characteristics that assist in distinguishing them from panic, and treatment approaches that are typical for these conditions. Additionally, this review discusses key factors, including cultural considerations, to assist healthcare professionals in differentiating benign from medically relevant symptoms in panic sufferers.
... Another hypothesis is that physical state may influence psychological anxiety. There are several reports of anxiety among POTS patients, indicating that anxiety in patients with POTS is caused by biological rather than psychological factors [27]. Patients with POTS have increased vigilance and anxiety related to their perception of cardiac symptoms [28]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), a subset of orthostatic dysregulation, has been reported to be associated with anxiety. POTS can be classified into two forms based on the degree of tachycardia during orthostasis. Reportedly, POTS with decreased orthostatic heart rate increase is associated with suppressed cardiac parasympathetic activity and increased sympathetic activity in the supine position. In this study, the relationship between the two types of POTS and anxiety was evaluated in terms of autonomic function. Methods Fifty-two patients (23 male, age 10–15 years) who were diagnosed with POTS at the Department of Pediatrics, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University from 2019 to 2021, completed a standing test and were accordingly classified into a Su group, with tachycardia from the supine position and a low heart rate increase on standing, a SI group, with a high heart rate increase during standing. They then completed the State-Trait Anxiety Scale for Children (STAIC) questionnaire. Autonomic function was assessed by frequency analysis (MemCalc method) based on heart rate, blood pressure changes, heart rate and blood pressure variability during the orthostatic test. Results Patients in the Su group had higher trait anxiety and state anxiety, lower cardiac parasympathetic activity (RR-HF) in the supine position, and greater variability in cardiac parasympathetic activity during orthostasis than were found for patients in the SI group. The Su group had a greater decrease in cardiac index on standing than that of the SI group. Conclusions The Su group results may be partly attributed to chronically low venous return. We also found that patients in the Su group had low parasympathetic activity in the supine position, which may interact with the anxiety-prone characteristics of these patients. Therefore, it seems necessary to consider both physical and psychosomatic treatment approaches for patients with POTS.
... Neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been reported to be associated with a high prevalence of comorbidity with migraine, asthma, and other physical disorders [28,29]. In OI, adult patients with POTS were reported to score significantly higher than controls on the inattention and ADHD subscales [30]. ASD is linked to autonomic dysfunction [31]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Orthostatic intolerance (OI), which is common in children and adolescents, negatively impacts their quality of life (QOL) due to physical symptoms that limit work, school, and daily activities. The purpose of this study is to explore the association of physical and psychosocial factors with QOL scores in children and adolescents with OI. Methods A cross sectional observational study was conducted. The study participants included 95 Japanese pediatric patients of age 9–15 years who were diagnosed with OI from April 2010 to March 2020. The QOL scores and the QOL T-scores of children with OI assessed using the KINDL-R questionnaire at the initial visit were compared with conventional normative data. The associations of physical and psychosocial factors with the QOL T-scores were examined using multiple linear regression. Results Pediatric patients with OI had significantly lower QOL scores than healthy children in both elementary (50.7 ± 13.5 vs. 67.9 ± 13.4, p < 0.001) and junior high schools (51.8 ± 14.6 vs. 61.3 ± 12.6, p < 0.001). This finding was observed in the physical, mental, self-esteem, friends, and school domains. Total QOL scores were significantly associated with school nonattendance (β = − 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = − 5.8 to − 0.5, p = 0.022) and poor relationship with school (β = − 5.0, 95% CI = − 9.8 to − 0.4, p = 0.035). Conclusions These results suggest that the assessment of QOL, including both physical and psychosocial aspects, especially school factors, needs to be implemented earlier in children and adolescents with OI.
... There are several reports of anxiety among POTS patients, indicating that anxiety in patients with POTS is caused by biological rather than psychological factors. 23 Patients with POTS have increased vigilance and anxiety related to their perception of cardiac symptoms. 24 The results of this study show that the Su group had a greater reduction in CI on standing than that of the SI group, indicating that there was less venous return to the heart while standing. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Background Postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), a subset of orthostatic dysregulation, has been reported to be associated with anxiety. POTS can be classified into two forms based on the degree of tachycardia during orthostasis. Reportedly, POTS with decreased orthostatic heart rate increase is associated with suppressed cardiac parasympathetic activity and increased sympathetic activity in the supine position. In this study, the relationship between the two types of POTS and anxiety was evaluated in terms of autonomic function. Methods Fifty-two patients (23 males, aged 10–15 years) who were diagnosed with POTS at the Department of Pediatrics, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University from 2019 to 2021, provided completed the State-Trait Anxiety Scale for Children (STAIC) questionnaire. They then completed a standing test and were accordingly classified into the two groups of POTS, the Su group, with tachycardia from the supine position and a low heart rate increase on standing, and the SI group, with a high heart rate increase during standing. Autonomic function was assessed by frequency analysis (MemCalc method) based on heart rate, blood pressure changes, heart rate, and blood pressure variability during the orthostatic test. Results Patients in the Su group had higher characteristic anxiety, lower cardiac parasympathetic activity (RR-HF) in the supine position, and greater variability in cardiac parasympathetic activity during orthostasis than those of patients in the SI group. The Su group had a greater decrease in cardiac index on standing than that of the SI group. Conclusions The Su group results may be partly attributed to chronically low venous return. We also found that patients in the Su group had low parasympathetic activity in the supine position, which may interact with the anxiety-prone characteristics of these patients. Therefore, it seems necessary to consider both physical and psychosomatic treatment approaches for patients with POTS. Trial registration The clinical trial registry of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Clinical Trial Registration No. 2662-2. Registered 5 March 2019. https://ompu.bvits.com/rinri/Common/print_approve.aspx?ID=3479
Article
Introduction: Data for Emergency Department utilisation and diagnoses in adolescents with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome are lacking, making prevention of these visits more difficult to achieve. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome between ages 12 and 18 years seen in the Emergency Department at a large tertiary care children's hospital. These subjects were age- and sex-matched with controls, with volume of primary and total diagnoses assessed. Due to the relatively small number of subjects, a ± 3-year variance was used among control patients for age matching. Results: A total of 297 patients in each group were evaluated. The percentage of female patients was 80.5%. The median age of the subjects was 15.1 years (interquartile range 14.1-15.9), and the median age of controls was 16.1 years (interquartile range 14.4-17.4) (p < 0.00001). Patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome had greater gastroenterologic and headache diagnoses (p < 0.00001); controls had greater autonomic and psychiatric diagnoses. Discussion: Adolescent patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome who present to the Emergency Department have a preponderance of gastroenterologic and headache complaints versus controls.
Article
Background and objective Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) is a chronic health condition affecting mostly women of childbearing age, and significantly impacting their health and quality of life. It is currently poorly understood with no approved licensed treatments. The aim of this systematic review was to contextualize the symptom burden of POTS, and review factors associated with this burden that may guide future treatments. The specific questions were (1) How does symptom burden in POTS compare to the burden in other long term conditions (LTCs), (2) Which factors are associated with POTS symptom burden, and (3) Which interventions show promise in reducing symptom burden in POTS. Databases and data treatment Electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, APA PsycArticles, OpenGrey) were searched from inception to January 2022 for observational studies reporting on the association between any biological, psychological or social factors and symptom burden, and randomized controlled trials reporting on interventions for symptom burden in adults with POTS. Two reviewers independently conducted eligibility screening, data extraction and quality assessment. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results/Conclusion 5159 entries were screened for eligibility. Twenty-nine studies were included (1372 participants with POTS of a total sample size of 2314, 17 High-, 12 Medium-quality), seventeen were observational and twelve were randomized controlled experimental and intervention trials. Overall methodological quality of the evidence was medium-high but heterogeneity was high and sample sizes modest, allowing moderately robust conclusions. Orthostatic symptom burden was higher in POTS than other LTCs. Serum activity against adrenergic α1 receptors, physical functioning, depression, catastrophizing, prolonged cognitive stress testing and anxiety were significantly associated with symptom burden in medium-high quality studies. Preliminary medium-high quality evidence from predominantly proof-of-concept (n = 11) studies and one 3-month 2 × 2 factorial design trial suggest that compression garments, propranolol, pyridostigmine, desmopressin, and bisoprolol may hold promise in reducing symptom burden. Directions for future research include investigating associated factors over time, the development of complex interventions which address both biological and psychosocial factors associated with symptom burden, and effectiveness trials of these interventions. Significance POTS symptom burden is high, particularly in relation to orthostatic intolerance when compared to other long-term conditions (LTCs). Despite this burden, there are no effectiveness randomized controlled trials of treatment to reduce symptoms in POTS. This review provides a starting point to understanding researched biological and psychosocial factors associated with this burden. There was however inconsistency in the measurement of symptom burden, lowering the confidence of cross-study inferences. A coherent definition of POTS symptom range, severity and impact along with a validated and reliable POTS-specific instrument is currently lacking. A standardized questionnaire to assess POTS symptom burden as a core outcome measure will help clarify future research and clinical practice.
Article
Full-text available
The development of a 21-item self-report inventory for measuring the severity of anxiety in psychiatric populations is described. The initial item pool of 86 items was drawn from three preexisting scales: the Anxiety Checklist, the Physician’s Desk Reference Checklist, and the Situational Anxiety Checklist. A series of analyses was used to reduce the item pool. The resulting Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a 21-item scale that showed high internal consistency (α = .92) and test—retest reliability over 1 week, r (81) = .75. The BAI discriminated anxious diagnostic groups (panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, etc.) from nonanxious diagnostic groups (major depression, dysthymic disorder, etc). In addition, the BAI was moderately correlated with the revised Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, r (150) = .51, and was only mildly correlated with the revised Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, r (153) = .25.
Article
Full-text available
The Perth Community Stroke Study (PCSS) was a population-based study of the incidence, cause, and outcome of acute stroke. Subjects from the study were assessed initially, by examination and interview, and at four- and 12-month follow-ups to determine differences in prevalence of depression between the sexes and between patients with first-ever and recurrent strokes. The prevalence of depressive illness four months after stroke in 294 patients from the PCSS was 23% (18-28%), 15% (11-19%) major depression and 8% (5-11%) minor depression. There were no significant differences between the sexes or between patients with first-ever and recurrent strokes. With a non-hierarchic approach to diagnosis of those with depression, 26% of men and 39% of women had an associated anxiety disorder, mainly agoraphobia. Nine per cent of male and 13% of female patients interviewed had evidence of depression at the time of the stroke. Twelve months after stroke 56% of the men were still depressed (40% major and 16% minor), as were 30% of the women (12% major and 18% minor). The prevalence of depression after stroke was comparable with that reported from other studies, and considerably less than that reported from in-patient and rehabilitation units.
Article
Errors in Byline, Author Affiliations, and Acknowledgment. In the Original Article titled “Lifetime Prevalence and Age-of-Onset Distributions of DSM-IV Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication,” published in the June issue of the ARCHIVES (2005;62:593-602), an author’s name was inadvertently omitted from the byline and author affiliations footnote on page 592, and another author’s affiliation was listed incorrectly. The byline should have appeared as follows: “Ronald C. Kessler, PhD; Patricia Berglund, MBA; Olga Demler, MA, MS; Robert Jin, MA; Kathleen R. Merikangas, PhD; Ellen E. Walters, MS.” The author affiliations footnote should have appeared as follows: “Author Affiliations: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Kessler; Mss Demler and Walters; and Mr Jin); Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Ms Berglund); and Section on Developmental Genetic Epidemiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Md (Dr Merikangas).” On page 601, the first sentence of the acknowledgment should have appeared as follows: “The authors appreciate the helpful comments of William Eaton, PhD, and Michael Von Korff, ScD.” Online versions of this article on the Archives of General Psychiatry Web site were corrected on June 10, 2005.
Book
Recent years have seen tremendous advances in understanding and treating Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Now in a revised and expanded third edition, this authoritative handbook brings the field up to date with current, practical information on nearly every aspect of the disorder. Drawing on his own and others' ongoing, influential research - and the wisdom gleaned from decades of front-line clinical experience - Russell A. Barkley provides insights and tools for professionals working with children, adolescents, or adults. Part I presents foundational knowledge about the nature and developmental course of ADHD and its neurological, genetic, and environmental underpinnings. The symptoms and subtypes of the disorder are discussed, as are associated cognitive and developmental challenges and psychiatric comorbidities. In Parts II and III, Barkley is joined by other leading experts who offer state-of-the-art guidelines for clinical management. Assessment instruments and procedures are described in detail, with expanded coverage of adult assessment. Treatment chapters then review the full array of available approaches - parent training programs, family-focused intervention for teens, school- and classroom-based approaches, psychological counseling, and pharmacotherapy - integrating findings from hundreds of new studies. The volume also addresses such developments as once-daily sustained delivery systems for stimulant medications and a new medication, atomoxetine. Of special note, a new chapter has been added on combined therapies. Chapters in the third edition now conclude with user-friendly Key Clinical Points. This comprehensive volume is intended for a broad range of professionals, including child and adult clinical psychologists and psychiatrists, school psychologists, and pediatricians. It serves as a scholarly yet accessible text for graduate-level courses. Note: Practitioners wishing to implement the assessment and treatment recommendations in the Handbook are advised to purchase the companion Workbook, which contains a complete set of forms, questionnaires, and handouts, in a large-size format with permission to photocopy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)(jacket)
Article
In orthostatic intolerance, the patient develops symptoms while standing that are relieved when the patient assumes a supine position. Different degrees of orthostatic intolerance exist, but not a system of grading severity. We have developed a system that grades the severity of orthostatic intolerance by the three-pronged criteria of the rapidity of development and the severity of orthostatic symptoms, the ability of the subject to withstand orthostatic stresses, and the degree of interference with daily living. In this article, this system is presented, and one disorder, postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS), is examined in some detail.
Article
The clinical experience of the authors has suggested there is a significant group of elderly and individuals with medical illness and depressive symptoms who do not meet DSM-IV criteria for major depression. We were interested in all available data regarding minor depression in both the medically ill and community individuals. MEDLINE was searched from 1965 to 1995, using the terms "depressive disorders" and "medical illness," as well as "atypical depression" and "elderly." Relevant references from these primary articles were also utilized. In medical patients, depressive symptoms were associated with decreased likelihood of discharge to home. Although diagnostic criteria vary, some suggest anhedonia as the central feature. From 3 to 16 percent of medical outpatients suffer from minor depression. Up to 64 percent of medical inpatients will complain of depressed mood. Studies in community samples found that minor depression was responsible for 9 to 16 percent of total disability days, and was associated with absenteeism from work, as well as separation and divorce. Little is known about the natural history and prognosis of minor depression. Minor depression is both common and has a significant impact on the health care system, and therefore deserves further study.
Article
Rating scales are valuable tools in both assessment and treatment monitoring. However, caution in their use is indicated because of several types of rater errors. Recent large-scale normative studies provide a set of instruments that cover child, adolescent, and adult ages, with separate gender norms and large representative samples. By including DSM-IV symptoms for ADHD in a proposed nationwide standardization of parent, teacher, and self-report scales, it is apparent that the proposed subtypes of ADHD are reasonable; however, item content in this standardization is somewhat broader than that proposed by DSM-IV. Empirical indexes were created and cross-validated, providing powerful discrimination between ADHD and non-ADHD samples. Separate scoring for the traditional DSM subtypes of ADHD allows both categorical and dimensional measures to be used in assessment and treatment monitoring.