Three main hypotheses have been postulated over the past century to explain the outbreaking population dynamics of eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens). The Silviculture Hypothesis first arose in the 1920s, with the idea that outbreaks were driven by forestry practices favoring susceptible softwood species. In the 1960s, it was proposed that populations were governed by Multiple Equilibria, with warm weather conditions releasing low-density populations from the regulatory control of natural enemies. Dispersal from outbreak foci, or " epicenters, " was seen as causing widespread outbreaks that eventually collapsed following resource depletion. However, in the 1980s, following the re-analysis of data from the 1940s outbreak in New Brunswick, this interpretation was challenged. The alternative Oscillatory Hypothesis proposed that budworm population dynamics were governed by a second-order density-dependent process, with oscillations being driven by natural enemy–victim interactions. Under this hypothesis, weather and resource availability contribute to secondary fluctuations around the main oscillation, and weather and moth dispersal serve to synchronize population cycles regionally. Intensive, independent population studies during the peak and declining phases of the 1980s outbreak supported the principal tenet of the Oscillatory Hypothesis, but concluded that host plant quality played a more important role than this hypothesis proposed. More recent research on the early phase of spruce budworm cycles suggests that mate-finding and natural-enemy-driven Allee effects in low-density populations might be overcome by immigration of moths, which can facilitate the onset of outbreaks. Even more recent research has supported components of all three hypotheses attempting to explain spruce budworm dynamics. In the midst of a new rising outbreak (2006-present), we discuss the evolution of debates surrounding these hypotheses from a historic perspective, examine gaps in current knowledge, and suggest avenues for future research (e.g., intensive studies on low-density populations) to better understand and manage spruce budworm populations. The ecological mechanisms that drive periodic oscillations in animal populations have been a subject of intrigue and debate among population ecologists for at least a century (Elton 1924, Graham 1939, Berryman 1996, Liebhold and Kamata 2000). Outbreak-prone her-bivorous insects have attracted particularly intense study, because many of them have widespread and severe impacts on agricultural and forestry systems. This has included many empirical studies, of course, but herbivorous insects have also provided the foundations for theoretical debates about the mechanisms of animal population dynamics (reviewed in Berryman 2003). Such theoretical debates cry out for long-term data sets to help resolve them, and while these are unfortunately uncommon, they exist for a number of herbivorous insects. Long-term studies tend to generate a daunting quantity of data, and surprisingly often, the concordance between long-term data and theoretical expectations is not obvious. This can result in conflicting literature and in the lengthy persistence of conflicting hypotheses about population dynamics. The eastern spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens), Lepidoptera: Tortricidae; henceforth, just " spruce budworm " or " budworm ") exemplifies this conundrum. Despite more than 65 yr of intensive research, multiple long-term studies , and hundreds of published articles, our understanding of budworm population dynamics has seen paradigms shifting through the decades, but no broad consensus has been reached on the ecological factors that drive and modulate population oscillations (Sturtevant et al. 2015).