Content uploaded by Claudio Benvenuti
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Claudio Benvenuti on Nov 27, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Gynecological Endocrinology, 2012; Early Online: 1–4
© 2012 Informa UK, Ltd.
ISSN 0951-3590 print/ISSN 1473-0766 online
DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2012.738724
Objective: To assess the safety of a nutraceutical compound
containing soy isoflavones and Lactobacillus sporogenes on
endometrium, breast and liver function. Setting: Outpatient
Menopausal Clinic. Study Design: 130 healthy postmenopausal
women suffering from menopausal symptoms were randomized
to receive soy isoflavones 60 mg and Lactobacillus sporogenes
1 billion spores (group E: 65 women) or calcium and vitamin D3
(group C: 65 women). Safety of the treatment was assessed at
baseline and after 1 year taking into account endometrial thick-
ness, mammographic density, serum levels of transaminases,
γ-GT and bilirubin. Efficacy of the treatment was evaluated
rating the score of menopausal symptoms at baseline and every
3 months. The statistical analysis was carried out with χ2
, Fisher
exact’s test and ANOVA. Results: After 12 months of treatment
mammographic density, endometrial thickness and hepatic
function did not show significant differences between groups,
while menopausal symptoms were progressively and signifi-
cantly reduced in severity and frequency during treatment with
soy isoflavones plus Lactobacillus sporogenes versus calcium
plus vitamin D3. Conclusion: A 12 months treatment with a
nutraceutical compound based on isoflavones and Lactobacillus
sporogenes at the recommended doses is safe for endometrium,
mammary glands and liver function in postmenopausal women.
Keywords: Endometrial thickness, isoflavones, lactobacillus,
menopausal symptoms, mammographic density
Introduction
Vasomotor menopausal symptoms impair women’s daily quality
of life. Appropriate treatment includes an early administration
of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) [1]. Customisation of
the dose, routes of administration, types of combination, annual
controls and treatment duration less than 5 years are guarantees
of a good risk/benet ratio [2]. Nevertheless, HRT use is usually
restricted to moderate or severe symptoms, and is limited by
contraindications and warnings such as mammary cancer or
advanced menopausal age. Moreover, many women simply refuse
HRT for a variety of reasons concerning fear of cancer and weight
gain [3] and request a “natural” approach [4]. In this scenario,
nutraceuticals classied as food supplements have a role in the
management of symptomatic menopausal women. Particularly,
soy isoavones (SI) are natural substances as genistein and daid-
zein with agonist-antagonist oestrogen action that have been
demonstrated to alleviate climacteric symptoms at the dose
between 40 and 80 mg/day [5,6].
SI exert elective stimulation of β-oestrogen receptors (βERs)
with less anity and lower potency than oestrogens [7], moreover
stimulate the synthesis of SHBG [8], therefore, safety in long-
term use could be expected. While epidemiological, experimental
and clinical studies suggest the ecacy of the phytoestrogens in
reducing the risks of endometrium and breast cancer [9,10], the
long-term results are not completely consistent [11–14].
It is well known that the absorption of the SI depends on the
presence of the intestinal ora that is capable to produce glyco-
sidases and therefore to hydrolyze genistin and daidzin to the
active aglycons [15,16]. Taken this consideration, it has been
appeared quite rational to combine SI with lactic acid bacteria in
the form of spores, resistant to the gastric and biliary secretion,
to assure the bioavailability of SI [17,18]. To date, clinical data
on long-term eects of nutraceuticals with SI and Lactobacillus
sporogenes on endometrium, mammary glands and liver func-
tion in postmenopausal women are lacking. e aim of the study
was to assess the eects of a nutraceutical compound containing
isoavones and Lactobacillus sporogenes compared to calcium
and vitamin D alone on endometrium, breast and liver function.
Material and methods
In a prospective randomised study 130 healthy postmenopausal
women suering from menopausal symptoms were enrolled.
Inclusion criteria were: age 45–65 years, amenorrhoea > 12
months, FSH > 30 mIU/mL, E2 < 20 pg/mL. Exclusion criteria
were: use of antibiotic in the last 6 months, HRT or treat-
ments for climacteric symptoms, dietetic regimens such as
strict vegetarian, high bre or high soy diet, regular consump-
tion of vitamin and mineral supplementation greater than the
Recommended Dietary Allowances, chronic disorders, benign
breast disease, endometrial thickness > 5 mm and BMI > 30. e
study was approved by the Local Ethic Committee. An informed
consent was obtained and the subject’s right to withdraw from
the study was clearly allowed. Using the randomization list
balanced in blocks of 10 provided for each centre, the patients
received one tablet per day (apart from meals) containing
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Endometrial, breast and liver safety of soy isoflavones plus Lactobacillus
sporogenes in post-menopausal women
Nicola Colacurci1, Pasquale De Franciscis1, Marco Atlante2, Pasquale Mancino3, Marco Monti3, Giuseppe Volpini4
& Claudio Benvenuti5
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences – Second University of Naples – Largo Madonna delle Grazie 1,
Naples, Italy, 2Menopausal Outpatient Clinic, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano Laziale, Rome, Italy, 3Department of Gynaecology,
Obstetrics and Urologic Sciences – La Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, 4ASL RMA Woman Health Centre S. Anna, Rome, Italy, and
5Medical Department, Rottapharm Madaus, Monza, Italy
Correspondence: Pasquale De Franciscis, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Sciences – Second University of Naples – Largo
Madonna delle Grazie 1, Via Tasso 133, 80127 Naples, Italy. Tel: +390815665603. Fax +390815665610. E-mail: pasquale.defranciscis@unina2.it
Gynecological Endocrinology
2012
00
00
1
4
© 2012 Informa UK, Ltd.
10.3109/09513590.2012.738724
0951-3590
1473-0766
Long-term safety of isoavones
N. Colacurci et al.
Gynecol Endocrinol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Francesca Gualtieri on 12/12/12
For personal use only.
2 N. Colacurci et al.
Gynecological Endocrinology
the active compound or placebo for 12 months. e active
compound contained a nutraceutical combination of SI 60 mg
(30 mg of genistin, 30 mg of daidzin), Lactobacillus sporogenes 1
billion spores, calcium 240 mg, vitamin D3 5 µg and glucosamine
250 mg (group E: 65 women); the placebo tablets contained
calcium 240 mg and vitamin D3 5 µg (group C: 65 women). Both
tablet types were supplied by the same manufacturing company
(Rottapharm Madaus, Italy), and were identical in appearance
and packaging. All subjects received a list of foods to avoid
containing soy and phytoestrogen. During the study the women
were encouraged to lead normal lives with no changes in dietary
habits, alcohol consumption, or physical activity.
Safety of the treatment was assessed at baseline and aer 1
year, and was based on endometrial thickness, mammographic
density, hepatic function, report of adverse events. Endometrial
thickness was measured with a 5.9-MHz transvaginal transducer
(Voluson 730 expert-GE) in the anteroposterior direction from
the echogenic interface of the endometrial-myometrial junc-
tion. Mammographic density was classied according to the
criteria set out by Wolfe as previously described [19]. Moreover,
mastodynia and mammary tension reported by the patients
were classied as mild, moderate and severe. Hepatic func-
tion was assessed by means of serum levels of transaminases,
γ-GT and bilirubin. Ecacy of the treatment was evaluated
rating the score of menopausal symptoms (ushing, nocturnal
sweating, palpitations, libido loss, vaginal dryness, dyspa-
reunia) at baseline and every 3 months. A standardized deni-
tion of severity was used to record the symptoms: 0= absent;
1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe; 4= very severe. Compliance
with use of the medication was conrmed by checking diaries
and obtaining unused tablets back at the end of the study. e
statistical analysis was carried out with χ2
, Fisher exact’s test
and ANOVA when appropriate.
Results
Baseline clinical characteristics were homogeneous between group
E (55.3 ± 7.6 years, BMI 24.9 ± 2.9, amenorrhoea 3.2 ± 2.8 years)
and group C (5.7 ± 7.7 years, 25.0 ± 2.9, amenorrhoea 2.8 ± 2.6
years). In group E the treatment was withdrawn in two cases for
cautionary reasons and in one case for diarrhoea, in group C one
patient discontinued the treatment for mammary tension and two
patients were lost to follow-up. Finally, data of sixty-two patients
for each group were available: aer 12 months of treatment
mammographic density and endometrial thickness decreased in
both study groups with no signicant dierence, hepatic func-
tion did not show signicant dierences between groups (Table
I); menopausal symptoms were progressively and signicantly
improved in terms of severity and frequency during active versus
placebo treatment (Figure1). No dierence in mastodynia and
mammary tension was observed between the groups.
Discussion
Altogether, our data show that a combination of nutraceuticals
based on SI and Lactobacillus sporogenes administered for 1
year at the recommended daily dose is safe for endometrium,
mammary tissue and hepatic function. e clinical outcome
also conrms the previously documented eectiveness on
menopausal symptoms of the combination favoured by the
improved bioavailability of the SI guaranteed by Lactobacillus
sporogenes [20–22].
It is well known that SI selectively bind to βERs, that are poorly
represented in the organs susceptible to estrogen-dependent
tumors [23], with less anity and milder action than oestrogens
[7]; moreover, they stimulate the synthesis of SHBG subtracting
estradiol from the circulation [8]. erefore, it could be expected
that SI have very slight eects on the endometrium and breasts,
much smaller than exogenous oestrogens, and the mixed
oestrogen agonist-antagonist properties showed by SI [24] can
explain the weak oestrogenic eects.
Epidemiological studies indicate a relatively low inci-
dence of hormone-dependent tumours both endometrial
[25,26] and breast [27,28] in populations that consume
high amounts of soy, although there is no general consensus
concerning the real daily quantity of soy intake in those
populations [29] and the effect may be restricted to soy food
consumption in the same amount commonly consumed in
Asian populations [30].
Experimental data on endometrial eects of SI are generally
reassuring [31–33], while those on breast eects are contrasting:
a large body of evidence suggests that SI protect against breast
cancer [34,35], but other reported that they may induce prolifera-
tion of cultured human MCF-7 breast cancer cells [36] and harm-
fully interact with selective estrogen receptor modulators such as
tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors [13,14].
More than 15 RCTs show no evidence of estrogenic or prolifera-
tive endometrial eects of SI [37] with the exception of a 5-year study
[11] that found no cases of endometrial hyperplasia aer 30-month
treatment but a small increase in the number of women that devel-
oped simple hyperplasia aer 5 years. e weaknesses of this study
have been highlighted [6] regarding the high dose of SI that was 2 to
2.5 times higher than the limit xed by the Italian Ministry for food
supplements containing isoavones (80 mg/day) [38].
Information on the relation between soy intake and breast
risk is limited and is focused on mammographic density as a
biomarker for cancer risk [39]. A systematic review of the few
available RCTs showed that SI intake does not alter breast density
in post-menopausal women, but may cause a small increase in
breast density in pre-menopausal women [40]. Larger long-term
trials are therefore required.
A very recent meta-analysis including 174 randomized clinical
trials with a total of 9629 women, 5502 of whom were treated with
phytoestrogens, reported a similar rate of adverse events with
Table I. Mammographic density score, endometrial thickness and liver function values before and aer the treatments.
Isoavones + lactobacillus (62 patients) Calcium + vitamin D3 (62 patients)
Baseline 1 Ye ar Baseline 1 Ye ar
Mammographic density score 1.89 ± 0.96 1.80 ± 0.95 1.75 ± 0.85 1.58 ± 0.84
Endometrial thickness 3.35 ± 0.95 3.08 ± 0.62 3.47 ± 1.07 3.12 ± 0.73
Alanine transaminase 19.9 ± 6.4 21.9 ± 6.5 20.2 ± 6.7 22.5 ± 7.2
Aspartate transaminase 20.6 ± 5.8 21.8 ± 5.4 20.5 ± 6.2 21.8 ± 5.6
Gamma-glutamyl transferase 24.3 ± 22.3 25.1 ± 24.6 25.6 ± 23.2 26.0 ± 25.5
Bilirubin 0.46 ± 0.25 0.42 ± 0.25 0.49 ± 0.29 0.41 ± 0.26
Gynecol Endocrinol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Francesca Gualtieri on 12/12/12
For personal use only.
Long-term safety of isoavones 3
© Informa UK, Ltd.
phytoestrogens and controls (36.7% vs. 38.0%) being gastrointes-
tinal eects statistically more frequent in phytoestrogens group
than in controls and no dierence in the incidence of gynaeco-
logical, neurological, or skeletal muscle eects between treat-
ment groups. In particular, there was no increased incidence of
side eects related to hormonal activity, such as risk of bleeding,
endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer and breast cancer
among women taking phytoestrogens compared with the control
group [41].
In agreement with the international literature [42] our ndings
are reassuring: in a homogeneous large sample of postmenopausal
patients treated for 12 months with 60 mg/day of SI enriched with
Lactobacillus sporogenes, neither endometrial stimulation nor
increase of breast density was observed. Moreover, enterohepatic
function does not appear impaired. In conclusion, SI plus lactoba-
cillus can eectively and safely be used at the recommended dose
in post-menopausal symptomatic women for whom HRT is not
indicated, is refused or discontinued.
Figure 1. Severity score of menopausal symptoms: percentage changes during the treatment. White bar: group E taking soy isoavones + lactobacillus
sporogenes. Grey bar: group C taking calcium + vitamin D3. (***p < 0.001 comparing group E vs. group C).
Gynecol Endocrinol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Francesca Gualtieri on 12/12/12
For personal use only.
4 N. Colacurci et al.
Gynecological Endocrinology
Acknowledgement
e authors have no nancial aliation (e.g. employment, direct
payments, stock holdings, retainers, consultantship, patient-
licensing arrangements, or honoraria) or involvement with any
commercial organization with direct nancial interest in the
subject or material discussed in this manuscript. e authors have
no nancial interest in any aspect of the work and did not receive
any nancial support. Any other potential conict of interest also
is disclosed.
Declaration of Interest: C. Benvenuti MD, ScD is consultant
for Rottapharm Madaus.
References
1. North American Menopause Society. Estrogen and progestogen use
in postmenopausal women: 2010 position statement of e North
American Menopause Society. Menopause 2010;17:242–255.
2. Gambacciani M. New HRT options for the treatment of menopausal
symptoms and the maintenance of quality of life in postmenopausal
women. Endocrine 2004;24:231–238.
3. Rabin DS, Cipparrone N, Linn ES, Moen M. Why menopausal women
do not want to take hormone replacement therapy. Menopause
1999;6:61–67.
4. Panay N. Integrating phytoestrogens with prescription medicines–a
conservative clinical approach to vasomotor symptom management.
Maturitas 2007;57:90–94.
5. Lethaby AE, Brown J, Marjoribanks J, Kronenberg F, Roberts H, Eden
J. Phytoestrogens for vasomotor menopausal symptoms. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD001395.
6. Messina M. Investigating the optimal soy protein and isoavone
intakes for women: a perspective. Womens Health (Lond Engl)
2008;4:337–356.
7. Setchell KD, Cassidy A. Dietary isoavones: biological eects and
relevance to human health. J Nutr 1999;129:758S–767S.
8. Pino AM, Valladares LE, Palma MA, Mancilla AM, Yáñez M,
Albala C. Dietary isoavones aect sex hormone-binding globulin
levels in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
2000;85:2797–2800.
9. Rose DP, Boyar AP, Wynder EL. International comparisons of mortality
rates for cancer of the breast, ovary, prostate, and colon, and per capita
food consumption. Cancer 1986;58:2363–2371.
10. Sirtori CR. Risks and benets of soy phytoestrogens in cardiovascular
diseases, cancer, climacteric symptoms and osteoporosis. Drug Saf
2001;24:665–682.
11. Unfer V, Casini ML, Costabile L, Mignosa M, Gerli S, Di Renzo GC.
Endometrial eects of long-term treatment with phytoestrogens:
a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fertil Steril
2004;82:145–8, quiz 265.
12. Palacios S, Pornel B, Bergeron C, Chantre P, Nogales F, Aubert L,
Vazquez F, et al. Endometrial safety assessment of a specic and
standardized soy extract according to international guidelines.
Menopause 2007;14:1006–1011.
13. Ju YH, Doerge DR, Allred KF, Allred CD, Helferich WG. Dietary
genistein negates the inhibitory eect of tamoxifen on growth of
estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells implanted in
athymic mice. Cancer Res 2002;62:2474–2477.
14. Ju YH, Doerge DR, Woodling KA, Hartman JA, Kwak J, Helferich
WG. Dietary genistein negates the inhibitory effect of letrozole
on the growth of aromatase-expressing estrogen-dependent
human breast cancer cells (MCF-7Ca) in vivo. Carcinogenesis
2008;29:2162–2168.
15. Izumi T, Piskula MK, Osawa S, Obata A, Tobe K, Saito M, Kataoka S, et
al. Soy isoavone aglycones are absorbed faster and in higher amounts
than their glucosides in humans. J Nutr 2000;130:1695–1699.
16. Borriello SP, Setchell KD, Axelson M, Lawson AM. Production and
metabolism of lignans by the human faecal ora. J Appl Bacteriol
1985;58:37–43.
17. Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G. Isoavone phytoestrogens in soymilk
fermented with ß-glucosidase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria.
Int J Food Sci Nutr 2011;62:111–120.
18. Ding WK, Shah NP. Enhancing the biotransformation of isoavones
in soymilk supplemented with lactose using probiotic bacteria during
extended fermentation. J Food Sci 2010;75:M140–M149.
19. Colacurci N, Fornaro F, De Franciscis P, Palermo M, del Vecchio
W. Eects of dierent types of hormone replacement therapy on
mammographic density. Maturitas 2001;40:159–164.
20. Agosta C, Atlante M, Benvenuti C. Randomized controlled study on
clinical ecacy of isoavones plus Lactobacillus sporogenes, associated
or not with a natural anxiolytic agent in menopause. Minerva Ginecol
2011;63:11–17.
21. Mucci M, Carraro C, Mancino P, Monti M, Papadia LS, Volpini G,
Benvenuti C. Soy isoavones, lactobacilli, Magnolia bark extract,
vitamin D3 and calcium. Controlled clinical study in menopause.
Minerva Ginecol 2006;58:323–334.
22. Benvenuti C, Setnikar I. Eect of Lactobacillus sporogenes on oral
isoavones bioavailability: single dose pharmacokinetic study in
menopausal women. Arzneimittelforschung 2011;61:605–609.
23. Gruber CJ, Tschugguel W, Schneeberger C, Huber JC. Production and
actions of estrogens. N Engl J Med 2002;346:340–352.
24. Kuiper GG, Lemmen JG, Carlsson B, Corton JC, Safe SH, van der Saag
PT, van der Burg B, Gustafsson JA. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals
and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology
1998;139:4252–4263.
25. Xu WH, Zheng W, Xiang YB, Ruan ZX, Cheng JR, Dai Q, Gao YT, Shu XO.
Soya food intake and risk of endometrial cancer among Chinese women
in Shanghai: population based case-control study. BMJ 2004;328:1285.
26. Goodman MT, Wilkens LR, Hankin JH, Lyu LC, Wu AH, Kolonel LN.
Association of soy and ber consumption with the risk of endometrial
cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1997;146:294–306.
27. Messina M, McCaskill-Stevens W, Lampe JW. Addressing the soy
and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop
proceedings. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1275–1284.
28. Trock BJ, Hilakivi-Clarke L, Clarke R. Meta-analysis of soy intake and
breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:459–471.
29. Nakamura Y, Tsuji S, Tonogai Y. Determination of the levels of
isoavonoids in soybeans and soy-derived foods and estimation of
isoavonoids in the Japanese daily intake. J AOAC Int 2000;83:635–650.
30. Wu AH, Yu MC, Tseng CC, Pike MC. Epidemiology of soy exposures
and breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2008;98:9–14.
31. Kayisli UA, Aksu CA, Berkkanoglu M, Arici A. Estrogenicity of
isoavones on human endometrial stromal and glandular cells. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:5539–5544.
32. Lian Z, Niwa K, Tagami K, Hashimoto M, Gao J, Yokoyama Y, Mori
H, Tamaya T. Preventive eects of isoavones, genistein and daidzein,
on estradiol-17beta-related endometrial carcinogenesis in mice. Jpn J
Cancer Res 2001;92:726–734.
33. Murray MJ, Meyer WR, Lessey BA, Oi RH, DeWire RE, Fritz MA. Soy
protein isolate with isoavones does not prevent estradiol-induced
endometrial hyperplasia in postmenopausal women: a pilot trial.
Menopause 2003;10:456–464.
34. Adlercreutz CH, Goldin BR, Gorbach SL, Höckerstedt KA, Watanabe S,
Hämäläinen EK, Markkanen MH, et al. Soybean phytoestrogen intake
and cancer risk. J Nutr 1995;125:757S–770S.
35. Messina M, Barnes S. e role of soy products in reducing risk of
cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:541–546.
36. Santell RC, Kieu N, Helferich WG. Genistein inhibits growth of
estrogen-independent human breast cancer cells in culture but not in
athymic mice. J Nutr 2000;130:1665–1669.
37. Messina M. e endometrial eects of isoavones: a discussion paper.
Complement er Clin Pract 2008;14:212–214.
38. Foth D, Nawroth F. Eect of phytoestrogens on the endometrium?
Fertil Steril 2005;83:256–7; author reply 257.
39. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal
patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1159–1169.
40. Hooper L, Madhavan G, Tice JA, Leinster SJ, Cassidy A. Eects of
isoavones on breast density in pre- and post-menopausal women: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Hum Reprod Update 2010;16:745–760.
41. Tempfer CB, Froese G, Heinze G, Bentz EK, Heer LA, Huber JC. Side
eects of phytoestrogens: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J
Med 2009;122:939–46.e9.
42. Consensus Opinion. e role of isoavones in menopausal health:
consensus opinion of the North American Menopause Society.
Menopause 2000;7:215–229.
Gynecol Endocrinol Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Francesca Gualtieri on 12/12/12
For personal use only.