ArticlePDF Available

List of Fossil Faunal Remains from Potočka zijalka (Slovenia)

Authors:
Gernot Rabeder at University of Vienna
Gernot Rabeder
D. Döppes
D. Döppes
D. Döppes
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Miha Krofel at University of Ljubljana
Miha Krofel
Martina Pacher at Naturmuseum St. Gallen
Martina Pacher
  • Naturmuseum St. Gallen
Show all 7 authorsHide
Download full-text PDF
Read full-text
Download citation
Content uploaded by Miha Krofel
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Miha Krofel
Content may be subject to copyright.
Mitt. Komm. Quartärforsch. Österr. Akad. Wiss., 13:47–48, Wien 2004
The list of all taxa published by BRODAR, S. & M. (1983)
and verifi ed through fossil remains in Potočka zijalka,
could be confi rmed for the most part in course of the
renewed excavations.
Pisces und Mollusca were only collected during the exca-
vation Brodar. Among birds the number of species could
be increased to four, but Lagopus mutus (BRODAR, S. & M.,
1983) was not recovered during the recent excavations.
The sand lizard Lacerta agilis is evident by two dentalia,
whereas remains of Amphibians could not be collected.
In the assemblage of small mammals, in layer 8 after
Brodar, remains of Soricids and Arvicolids predominate.
In course of the recent collections the Sorex-taxa are
confi rmed, though no remains of Crocidura and Talpa
were found.
The genus Myotis and Eptesicus among bats could not be
established, whereas well determined remains of the genus
Barbastella are available, which are close to the fi nds from
Drachenloch near Mixnitz.
Among rodents we could not detect any remains of Glirids,
while in BRODAR, S. & M. (1983) Glis and Muscardinus
are mentioned. Microtus-species (with the exception of
M. agrestis) are confi rmed, as well as Arvicola. The terms
Microtus incertus and Arvicola cfr. Scherman have been
replaced by M. cf. subterraneus and A. terrestris. There
were no fi nds of hares in the recent material. Remains of
marmots were discovered in nearly all excavation areas of
the cave and confi rmed as faunal element of the Plenigla-
cial by one radiometric date.
Cave bear is the most abundant species among large
mammals, followed by remains of wolves. According to
BRODAR, S. & M. (1983) the few remains of brown bear
belong to the Holocene but the recent investigations sug-
gest Pleistocene remains as well. Cave lion is a newly
described species, although the specimen had already been
uncovered during the excavations by Brodar. A previous
mentioned phalange was incorrect determined (PACHER,
1998). Other Felidae are not available from the recent ex-
cavations, while BRODAR, S. & M. (1983) describe remains
of Lynx lynx from the cave entrance.
Concerning Mustelidae, Gulo gulo is fi rst determined in
the material from the recent excavation campaigns (DÖP-
PES, 2001). Martes foina is another new faunal element of
Potočka zijalka, but no remains of Mustela were evident
in the recent material.
Ungulata remains are rare, and only Rupicapra rupicapra
is confi rmed in the material of the renewed excavations.
Musk-ox, recovered during the excavation Brodar, is a
remarkable fi nd in the Southern Alps. According to BRO-
DAR, S. & M. (1983:189) it must have been imported by
men and it does not belong to the Pleistocene Fauna of
Slovenia (RAKOVEC, 1975:264).
References
BRODAR, S. & BRODAR, M., 1983. Potočka zijalka, visoko-
alpska postaja aurignacienskih lovcev (Potočka zijalka
– eine hochalpine Aurignacjäger-Station). — Dela 1
in 4. razr. SAZU, 24:1–213, Ljubljana.
DÖPPES, D., 2001. Gulo gulo (Mustelidae, Mammalia)
im Jungpleistozän Mitteleuropas. — Beitr. Paläont.,
26:1–95, Wien.
PACHER, M., 1998. Die pleistozäne Höhlenfundstelle
Potočka zijalka in Slowenien. — Geol.-Paläont. Mitt.
Innsbruck, 23:67–76, Innsbruck.
RAKOVEC, I., 1975. Razvoj kvatarne sesalske favne v Slo-
veniji. — Arh. vest., 24:225–270, Ljubljana.
List of Fossil Faunal Remains from Potočka zijalka
(Slovenia)
Gernot RABEDER1), Doris DÖPPES1), Miha KROFEL2), Martina PACHER1), Vida POHAR3), Karl L.
RAUSCHER1) & Gerhard WITHALM1)
RABEDER, G., DÖPPES, D., KROFEL, M., PACHER, M., POHAR, V., RAUSCHER, K. & WITHALM, G., 2004. List of Fossil Faunal
Remains from Potočka zijalka (Slovenia). — Mitt. Komm. Quartärforsch. Österr. Akad. Wiss., 13:47–48, Wien.
1) UNIV.-PROF. DR. GERNOT RABEDER, DR. DORIS DÖPPES,
DR. MARTINA PACHER, DR. KARL RAUSCHER & DR.
GERHA RD WITHALM, all: Institute of Palaeontology,
University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna,
Austria. e-mail: gernot.rabeder@univie.ac.at, doris.
doeppes@univie.ac.at, martina.pacher@univie.ac.at,
karl.rauscher@univie.ac.at, gerhard.withalm@univie.
ac.at
2) MIHA KROFEL, Zavrh 2, SI-1353 Borovnica, Slovenija.
e-mail: lynx_mk@hotmail.com
3) PROF. DR. VIDA POHAR, Department of Geology, Faculty
of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of
Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
48 Mitt. Komm. Quartärforsch. Österr. Akad. Wiss., 13, Wien, 2004
Table 1: List of faunal remains from Potočka zijalka.
BRODAR, S. & M. (1983) POHAR & RABEDER
Class Genus Species layer 1–7 layer 8–9 layer 1–7 layer 8–9
Amphibia Rana cf. temporaria — + — —
Rana cf. vulgaris — + — —
Reptilia Lacerta agilis + — 1
Aves Lagopus mutus + — 1 —
Pyrrhula pyrrhula — — 1 —
Emberiza sp. — — 1 —
Pyrrhocorax graculus — — 1 —
Garrulus cf. glandarius — — 1 —
Turdus ? sp. — — 1 —
Mammalia Sorex minutus — + — 2
Sorex alpinus — + — 1
Sorex araneus — + — 7
Crocidura sp. — + — —
Talpa europaea — + — —
Myotis myotis — + — —
Myotis sp. 1 — + — —
Myotis sp. 2 — + — —
Eptesicus serotinus — + — —
Barbastella cf. schadleri — — 5 —
Marmota marmota + — 1 1
Glis glis + — — —
Muscardinus avellanarius — + — —
Arvicola terrestris —„aff. Scher-
manni” — 2
Microtus arvalis — + — 24
Microtus agrestis — + — —
Microtus cf. subterraneus — „incertus“ — 11
Microtus nivalis + — — 3
Microtus oeconomus — — — 2
Lepus europaeus + — — —
Canis lupus + — ? 1
Vulpes vulpes + — —
Ursus arctos + ? ?
Ursus ingressus „spelaeus“„spelaeus“ ca. 50
Mustela nivalis + — —
Mustela sp. + — —
Martes foina — — — +
Martes martes — — — +
Gulo gulo — — 1 +
Panthera spelaea ? ? ? —
Lynx lynx — + — —
Cervus elaphus + — — —
Capreolus capreolus + — — —
Bos primigenius f. taurus + — — —
Rupicapra rupicapra + — 1 —
Ovibos moschatus + — — —
... In seguito è stato attribuito il rango di buona specie a Plecotus austriacus, distinta da Plecotus auritus (Lanza, 1960;Hanák, 1966), i Miniopteridae sono stati considerati una famiglia distinta da quella dei Vespertilionidae (Mein eTupinier, 1977), il Pipistrello di Savi è stato distinto dal genere Pipistrellus e ascritto al genere Hypsugo (Horáček eHanák, 1986) e il Serotino di Nilsson è stato distinto dal genere Eptesicus e ascritto al genere Amblyotus (Tiunov, 1989), ma in questo caso non c'è ancora accordo tra gli studiosi (cfr.Agnelli et al., 2004). Si sono, inoltre, precisati i criteri per riconoscere le differenze tra Myotis myotis e Myotis blythii (già Myotis oxygnathus) (Ruedi et al., 1990;Lanza e Agnelli, 1999) e sono state istituite alcune nuove specie come Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Jones eBarratt, 1999), Myotis aurascens (Benda eTsytsulina, 2000), ma in questo caso non c'è ancora accordo tra gli studiosi (cfr.Agnelli et al., 2004), Plecotus macrobullaris (Spitzenberger et al., 2003;) e Plecotus sardus, che attualmente rappresenta la prima ed unica specie endemica italiana in quanto segnalata soltanto in Sardegna (Mucedda et al., 2002;Agnelli et al., 2004). In occasione della revisione critica della fauna italiana si è esclusa definitivamente la possibile presenza di Nycteridae in Italia, Myotis dasycneme è stata considerata " specie accidentale " in quanto l'unica segnalazione riguarda un esemplare catturato a Trento nel 1881 (Amori et al., 1999;Lanza e Agnelli, 1999;Agnelli et al., 2004) e Rhinolophus blasii " specie di presenza non confermata " in quanto l'ultima segnalazione certa risale al 1927 in Val Rosandra (Trieste) (Agnelli et al., 2004). ...
... Nel Pleistocene superiore è presente anche a Riparo Mezzena, Grotta A di Veia e Covolo di Trene (Sorbini eDurante Pasa, 1974;Bon et al., 1991), Grotta del Broion (Bon et al., 1991), Grotta di Monte Cucco (Capasso Barbato e Kotsakis, 1986), Cittareale (Tata eKotsakis, 2005), Grotta Cola (Di Canzio e Petronio, 2001), Grotta di Castelcivita (Masini eAbbazzi, 1997) e Grotta di Dragonara (Kotsakis, 1987); nell'Olocene antico anche a Grotta d'Ernesto (Bartolomei, 1991), Grotta S. Angelo sulla Montagna dei Fiori (Wilkens, 1996) e Grotta del Cavallo (Cimò et al., 2005). La specie, inoltre, è conosciuta in vari giacimenti del Pleistocene superiore anche in Portogallo (Ferreira Bicho et al., 2003), Spagna (Altuna, 1972;Perez Ripoll, 1986;Sevilla García, 1988;Nadal, 2000;Sesé, 2007), Francia (Schreuder, 1959;Jullien, 1972;1976;Philippe et al., 1980;Clot e Evin, 1986;Desclaux e Defleur, 1997;Cregut-Bonnoure et al., 2005), Belgio (Gautier eHeinzelin, 1980), Polonia (Madeysca, 1982;Wołoszyn, 1987;1989;Cyrek et al., 2000;Ochman e Wołoszyn, 2003), Austria (Bauer, 1973), ex Jugoslavia (Malez, 1963;Marković e Pavlović, 1991;Dimitrijević, 1997;Rabeder et al., 2004) e Ucraina (Tatarinov, 1965;Madeyska, 2002), e dell'Olocene antico anche in Spagna (Altuna, 1972;Perez Ripoll, 1986;Peman, 1989), Svizzera (Blant et al., 2004), Germania (Horáček, 1976), Polonia (Wołoszyn, 1970;1987;1989;Nadachowski et al., 1989;Ochman, 2003;Ochman e Wołoszyn, 2000;, ex Cecoslovacchia (Horáček, 1976;Obuch, 2006) e Ungheria (Topál, 1959;Kordos, 1980;1983). Resti ossei riferiti a M. myotis vel blythii, infine, sono presenti a Grotta Breuil, Grotta Continenza e Grotta della Madonna (Tab. ...
... 2) ed è presente anche nel Pleistocene superiore dell'Isola di Palmaria (Tozzi, 1967, fide Kotsakis, 1987). Più numerose le segnalazioni nel resto d'Europa: nel Pleistocene superiore in Spagna (Sevilla García, 1988), Francia (Schreuder, 1959;Sevilla, 1990;Desclaux e Defleur, 1997), Germania (Horáček, 1976), Austria (Rabeder, 1973), Polonia (Kowalski, 1972;Wołoszyn, 1987;1989;Madeyska, 2002;Ochman, 2003;Ochman e Wołoszyn, 2003), ex Cecoslovacchia (Horáček, 1976;, ex Jugoslavia (Toškan, 2003;Rabeder et al., 2004), Bulgaria (Wołoszyn, 1982), Ucraina (Madeyska, 2002) e Russia (Rossina et al., 2006); nell'Olocene antico in Spagna (Peman, 1989;Nadal, 2000), Germania (Koenigswald e Rahle, 1975;Horáček, 1976), Polonia (Alexandrowicz et al., 1985;Wołoszyn, 1970;1987;1989;Nadachowski et al., 1989;Dagnan-Ginter et al., 1992;Ochman, 2003;Ochman e Wołoszyn, 2000;, ex Cecoslovacchia (Horáček, 1976;Obuch, 2006) e Ungheria (Topál, 1959;1964;Kordos, 1980;. L'odierno areale di distribuzione comprende buona parte dell'Europa, tranne le regioni più settentrionali, la Turchia, il Caucaso, il Marocco, le Isole Canarie e, forse, il Senegal (Mitchell-Jones et al., 1999;Horáček et al., 2000). ...
I chirotteri del Pleistocene superiore e Olocene antico di alcune grotte dell'Italia centro-meridionale
Article
Full-text available
  • Nov 2009
Bats of the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene from some caves of Central and Southern Italy - In this paper we expose the data on the remains of bats recovered from some caves of Central and Southern Italy. In the last 30 years in these caves there were archaeological excavations: Grotta dei Cocci (Umbria), Grotta Continenza and Grotta di Pozzo (Abruzzo), Grotta Barbara, Grotta Breuil and Grotta Mora di Cavorso (Latium), Grotta Santuario della Madonna (Calabria), Grotta delle Mura, Grotta Paglicci and Grotta Santa Maria di Agnano (Apulia). The age of the sites cover a time interval of about 40,000 years, including between the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene. For each species recognized some notes on the current ecological distribution, some osteometrical measures are exposed, and a reconnaissance attendance fossil referred to Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene reported in the Western Palaearctic, particularly with regard to Italy.
View
... Capreolus capreolus and Sus scrofa, Mauch Lenardi c et al., 2018). In Slovenia, two main sites related to the Late Pleistocene are Divje Babe 1 and Poto cka Zijalka (Rabeder et al., 2004;To skan and Kry stufek, 2007), the former chronologically assigned from MIS 5 to MIS 3 and the latter to MIS 3. Divje Babe 1 is characterized by an assemblage dominated by Clethrionomys glareolus and Chionomys nivalis, while Sicista subtilis is evidenced in a layer correlated to MIS 5. At Poto cka Zijalka, Microtus oeconomus has been identified in the upper layers. ...
Changes in the Late Pleistocene small-mammal distribution in the Italian Peninsula
Article
  • Dec 2019
  • QUATERNARY SCI REV
Recent studies of the Late Pleistocene small-mammal sequences of the Italian Peninsula have provided a more detailed context that sheds light on numerous aspects of the faunal communities in this area. A georeferenced database with 51 Italian Peninsula sites has been built in order to investigate changes in the species range distribution and the evolution of the small-mammal community during the Late Pleistocene, with a special focus on the late Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3) to Late Glacial assemblages. From the early Late Pleistocene, the Italian Peninsula was divided into two biotic macroregions: the northern Italian Peninsula and the southern Italian Peninsula. The former was characterized by the presence of eastern European species, the latter by the presence of the endemic Savi’s vole (Microtus (Terricola) savii) and the Roman mole (Talpa romana). Three sub-regions have been recognized on the basis of the presence of Dinaromys bogdanovi (northeastern Italian Peninsula) and the presence or absence of Glis glis (southern Tyrrhenian side and southern Adriatic side, respectively). Major oscillations corresponding to Dansgaard-Oeschger (DO) cycles and Heinrich Events (HE or H) have been identified in both macroregions. In particular, the Bølling-Allerød Interstadial can be considered a moment of major faunal renewal for the small-mammal communities of the Italian Peninsula. Finally, the small-mammal communities of the Italian Peninsula follow the same general path as that recognized throughout Mediterranean Europe during the Late Pleistocene: this is characterized by variations in the spread of eastern European taxa in relation to mountain barriers and by the absence of these taxa in the southern areas of the Italian and Iberian Peninsulas, compensated by the presence of endemic species.
View
... This cave, frequented by humans during the Early Upper Paleolithic, has yielded several osseous projectile points mostly fabricated from ursid bones (Hofreiter and Pacher 2004;Jéquier 2016), associated to a small Protoaurignacian lithic assemblage (Moreau et al. 2015). The zooarcheological record was mainly represented by ursids (in particular Ursus spelaeus, sensu lato), but its accumulation was in most cases natural (Pacher 2001;Pacher and Marinelli 2004;Rabeder et al. 2004). Nevertheless, the identification of a cave Fig. 12 PCA performed on the sample. ...
Archeological bone injuries by lithic backed projectiles: new evidence on bear hunting from the Late Epigravettian site of Cornafessa rock shelter (Italy)
Article
Full-text available
  • May 2019
Despite the widespread application of high-resolution quantitative methods in bone taphonomy, very few studies have focused on projectile impact marks. Therefore, in a previous work, we explored the potential of 3D microscopy in distinguishing bone hunting injuries from other taphonomic marks, developing a widely-applicable diagnostic framework based on experimental data and focused on Late Epigravettian projectiles. This paper aims to continue that research by applying 3D morphometrical analysis to zooarchaeological bone surfaces, in order to verify the validity and feasibility of this method and evaluate the reliability of the experimental record. Here we present the detailed analysis of a projectile impact mark, found on a rib of Ursus arctos from the Late Epigravettian site of Cornafessa rock shelter. The injury, located on the rib’s external surface, consists of a drag with several flint fragments embedded. X-ray µCT volume rendering and SEM imaging allowed us to analyze bone microstructure and drag’s qualitative features, while 3D measurements, processed through statistic, confirmed the interpretation of this mark as a hunting injury. The drag’s morphometric features are consistent with the experimental ones, connecting this mark to Late Epigravettian composite projectiles and declaring this evidence as the first direct proof of a bear hunted by using bow and arrow
View
The incised bone points from the Early Aurignacian of Potočka zijalka (Slovenia), hafting system or ornament?
Article
  • Jan 2015
  • QUATERN INT
The Upper Palaeolithic site of Potočka zijalka, located in the Carnic Alps at 1630 m a.s.l. in northern Slovenia has yielded a conspicuous amount of fauna throughout its 8 main layers. The faunal spectrum is mainly composed of Ursus speleaus, although a few Ungulates such as Cervus elaphus and Bos/Bison have been identified. The lithic industry is very poor and only one Dufour point was discovered. In layer 7 at the front of the cave, seven combustion structures were identified.The cave also contained, in its main 8 layers, 125 hard osseous artefacts, mainly made of bone (only three elements were identified as antler and the raw material of two is unidentified). Typologically, the corpus is composed of 12 points, two roughout of spear points and 111 elements of spear points. From the faunal reconstitution, it is probable that most are made out of Ursus sp. shafts, as is also partially confirmed by the DNA analysis previously conducted. This paper aims to reconstruct the chaîne opératoire of the simple-based spear points from a technological standpoint and to propose a functional interpretation for the incised pieces that were recovered in the cave.
View
DIEDRICH, C. 2015. “Neanderthal bone flutes“ – simply products of Ice Age spotted hyena scavenging activities on cave bear cubs in European cave bear dens. - Royal Society Open Science, 2, 14002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140022
Article
Full-text available
  • Apr 2015
Punctured extinct cave bear femora were misidentified in southeastern Europe (Hungary/Slovenia) as ‘Palaeolithic bone flutes’ and the ‘oldest Neanderthal instruments’. These are not instruments, nor human made, but products of the most important cave bear scavengers of Europe, hyenas. Late Middle to Late Pleistocene (Mousterian to Gravettian) Ice Age spotted hyenas of Europe occupied mainly cave entrances as dens (communal/cub raising den types), but went deeper for scavenging into cave bear dens, or used in a few cases branches/diagonal shafts (i.e. prey storage den type). In most of those dens, about 20% of adult to 80% of bear cub remains have large carnivore damage. Hyenas left bones in repeating similar tooth mark and crush damage stages, demonstrating a butchering/bone cracking strategy. The femora of subadult cave bears are intermediate in damage patterns, compared to the adult ones, which were fully crushed to pieces. Hyenas produced round–oval puncture marks in cub femora only by the bone-crushing premolar teeth of both upper and lower jaw. The punctures/tooth impact marks are often present on both sides of the shaft of cave bear cub femora and are simply a result of non-breakage of the slightly calcified shaft compacta. All stages of femur puncturing to crushing are demonstrated herein, especially on a large cave bear population from a German cave bear den.
View
Potočka zijalka, visoko-alpska postaja aurignacienskih lovcev (Potočka zijalka – eine hochalpine Aurignacjäger-Station). — Dela 1 in 4
  • 1-213
  • S Brodar
  • M Brodar
BRODAR, S. & BRODAR, M., 1983. Potočka zijalka, visoko-alpska postaja aurignacienskih lovcev (Potočka zijalka – eine hochalpine Aurignacjäger-Station). — Dela 1 in 4. razr. SAZU, 24:1–213, Ljubljana
Die pleistozäne Höhlenfundstelle Potočka zijalka in Slowenien
  • Jan 1998
  • 67-76
PACHER, M., 1998. Die pleistozäne Höhlenfundstelle Potočka zijalka in Slowenien. — Geol.-Paläont. Mitt. Innsbruck, 23:67–76, Innsbruck.
Gulo gulo (Mustelidae, Mammalia) im Jungpleistozän Mitteleuropas
  • Jan 2001
  • 1-95
DÖPPES, D., 2001. Gulo gulo (Mustelidae, Mammalia) im Jungpleistozän Mitteleuropas. — Beitr. Paläont., 26:1–95, Wien.
Razvoj kvatarne sesalske favne v Sloveniji
  • Jan 1975
  • 225-270
RAKOVEC, I., 1975. Razvoj kvatarne sesalske favne v Sloveniji. — Arh. vest., 24:225–270, Ljubljana.