ChapterPDF Available

Carbamates: Human Exposure and Health Effects

Authors:

Abstract

The extensive use of carbamate pesticides in modern agriculture has raised serious public concern regarding the environment and food safety. Due to their broad spectrum of biological activity, carbamates can be used as insecticides, fungicides, nematocides, acaracides, molluscicides sprout inhibitors or herbicides. Contamination of fruits and vegetables may result from treatment as well as from conditions such as improper use of pesticides, residues from preceding treatments in the soil and cross-contamination. Sources of residues in products of animal origin include contaminated water or feed, pesticide-treated housing, and contaminated milk. The presence of pesticide residues is a concern for consumers because carbamates are known to have potential harmful effects to other non-targeted organisms than pests and diseases. The major concerns are their toxic effects such as interfering with the reproductive systems and foetal development. In this chapter, the more relevant contributions, of the last ten years, to the current knowledge on several aspects regarding carbamate pesticides, such as mode of action, effects on human health, legislation, monitoring, human exposure to carbamate residues, risk and exposure assessment will be discussed.
21
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Carbamates: Human Exposure and Health Effects
Simone Morais, Elsa Dias and Maria de Lourdes Pereira
ABSTRACT
The extensive use of carbamate pesticides in modern agriculture has raised serious
public concern regarding the environment and food safety. Due to their broad
spectrum of biological activity, carbamates can be used as insecticides, fungicides,
nematocides, acaracides, molluscicides sprout inhibitors or herbicides.
Contamination of fruits and vegetables may result from treatment as well as from
conditions such as improper use of pesticides, residues from preceding treatments in
the soil and cross-contamination. Sources of residues in products of animal origin
include contaminated water or feed, pesticide-treated housing, and contaminated
milk. The presence of pesticide residues is a concern for consumers because
carbamates are known to have potential harmful effects to other non-targeted
organisms than pests and diseases. The major concerns are their toxic effects such as
interfering with the reproductive systems and foetal development. In this chapter,
the more relevant contributions, of the last ten years, to the current knowledge on
several aspects regarding carbamate pesticides, such as mode of action, effects on
human health, legislation, monitoring, human exposure to carbamate residues, risk
and exposure assessment will be discussed.
INTRODUCTION
Pesticides are of vital importance in the fight against diseases, for the production
and storage of food being widely used for pest control in agriculture, gardening,
homes and soil treatment (Crespo-Corral et al., 2008, Janssen, 1997). In spite of
their extensive use, an average of 35% of the produce is lost worldwide (Janssen,
1997). Carbamates represent one of the main category of synthetic organic
pesticides since their introduction into the agrochemical market in the 1950s
(Tomlin, 1997) and are used annually on a large scale worldwide (Paíga et al.
2009a). They constitute a versatile class of compounds used as insecticides,
fungicides, nematocides, acaracides, molluscicides, sprout inhibitors or herbicides.
Classification of pesticides to functionalities and chemical properties is available on
several informative website (www.epa.gov/pesticides/about/types.htm and
http://www.alanwood.net/pesticides). Although carbamates present low
bioaccumulation potentials and short-term toxicity (relatively short biological half-
lives and are fairly rapidly metabolized and excreted), they are considered
hazardous to the environment and human health being included in the priority list
released by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA, 1992).
Apart from their pesticide properties, the role of three carbamate insecticides
(carbaryl, baygon and carbofuran), as possible cancer chemotherapeutic agents was
22
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
recently explored on preliminary studies in vitro using trypsinized squamous cell
carcinoma, since they inhibit cellular metabolism including energy, protein, and
nucleic acid metabolism, thereby, causing cell regression and death (Amanullah and
Hari, 2011).
Three classes of carbamate compounds are known: i) the ester derivatives; ii) those
with the general structure R1NHC(O)OR2, in which R1 and R2 are aromatic and/or
aliphatic moieties, and iii) those containing a benzimidazole group (IPCS, 1986).
In this chapter, the more relevant contributions, of the last ten years, to the current
knowledge on several aspects regarding carbamate pesticides, such as mode of
action, effects on human health, legislation, monitoring, human exposure to
carbamate residues, risk and exposure assessment will be discussed.
MODE OF ACTION AND TOXICOLOGY
The mechanism of carbamates poisoning, except herbicidal carbamates, involves
carbamylating of the active site of acetylcholinesterase leading to the inactivation of
this essential enzyme which has an important role in nervous system of humans, and
other animal species (Ecobichon, 2001). Carbamate compounds are often called
anticholinesterases. In the presence of inhibitors, acetylcholinesterase becomes
progressively inhibited and is not further capable of hydrolyzing acetylcholine to
choline and acetic acid (Jokanovic, 2009; Jokanovic and Maksimovic, 1997).
Consequently, acetylcholine accumulates at cholinergic receptor sites and produces
effects equivalent to excessive stimulation of cholinergic receptors throughout the
central and peripheral nervous system. Inhibited enzyme can be spontaneously
reactivated, with reversal of inhibition occurring typically with half-time of an hour
or less after exposure (Jokanovic, 2009). This fact may reduce the possible period of
intoxication in situations of accidental overexposure or suicide attempts. The
inhibition of other esterases may also occur (Thompson, 1999).
Herbicidal carbamates (such as carbetamide) which are a limited number of
compounds are not inhibitors of cholinesterase and are cell division inhibitors
(Tomlin, 1997). Plants can metabolize carbamates in which arylhydroxylation and
conjugation, or hydrolytic breakdown are the main routes of detoxification. The
results of a number of studies suggest that carbamates are exclusively distributed via
the apoplastic system in plants (IPCS, 1986).
The acute toxicity of the different carbamates ranges from highly toxic to only
slightly toxic or practically non-toxic (IPCS, 1986). Concerning the main carbamate
insecticides in use, their relative toxic potency estimated human values, (Erdman,
2003) vary from high toxicity (LD50 <50 mg/kg; for aldicarb, aldoxycarb,
aminocarb, bendiocarb, carbofuran, dimetan, dimetilan, dioxacarb formetanate,
methiocarb, methomyl, oxamyl and propoxur) to moderate toxicity (LD50 = 50-200
mg/kg; bufencarb, carbosulfan, pirimicarb, promecarb, thiodicarb, trimethacarb) and
to low toxicity (LD50 > 200 mg/kg; fenocarb, carbaryl, isoprocarb, MPMC
(Meobal), MTMC (Metacrate, Tsumacide), XMC (Cosban)).
23
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
The acute dermal toxicity of carbamates is generally low to moderate; an exception
is aldicarb, which is highly toxic. Data are available for only a limited number of
substances (IPCS, 1986).
Short- and long-term toxicity studies have been carried out. Some carbamates are
very toxic and others are less toxic in long-term studies. For many years, long-term
toxicity data on carbamates have been evaluated by the FAO/WHO Joint Meeting
on Pesticide Residues (JMPR), and a number of ADI (the estimate of the amount of
a substance in food, mg/kg body weight/day, that can be ingested daily over a
lifetime without appreciable health risk to the consumer (WHO 1997)) for
carbamates have been established (IPCS, 1986).
Among other pesticides, carbamates have been included in the list of known
endocrine disruptor compounds (Schulte-Oehlmann et al., 2011). In this well-
designed review authors provide a databanks of a wide range of pesticides with
potentially endocrine-disrupting properties, discussion on some key questions
regarding the multiplicity of variables involved.
The onset of clinical effects subsequent to carbamate exposure depends on the dose,
route of exposure, type of carbamate involved, use of protective gear, and the
premorbid state of the victim (Rosman et al., 2009). Ingestion or inhalation of
carbamates results in a more rapid onset of clinical effects as compared with dermal
exposure. Acute carbamate poisoning episodes were recently described among
pesticide sprayers due to inadequate personal protection (Jensen et al., 2010). There
is an increase of pesticide exposure and poisoning in children around the world with
consequent morbidity and mortality (El-Naggar 2009; Balme et al., 2010; Jayashree
et al., 2011) Clinical manifestations for carbamates (excluding herbicides) result
from accumulation of ACh in the synapses and overstimulation of muscarinic and
nicotinic receptors throughout target organs. The main clinical manifestations of the
carbamate intoxication are muscarinic signs (miosis, salivation, sweating,
lacrimation, rhinorrhea, abdominal cramping, vomiting, diarrhea, urinary
incontinence, bronchospasm, dyspnea, hypoxemia, bradycardia, bronchial
secretions, pulmonary edema and respiratory failure), nicotinic signs (less frequent;
muscular twitching, fasciculations, muscle weakens including the respiratory
muscles, paralysis, tachycardia, hypertension) and central nervous system signs
(rare) (Rosman et al., 2009). The large demand for educational materials that
summarize the acute toxicity of pesticides is illustrated by the publication of five
editions of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Recognition and Management of
Pesticide Poisonings (US EPA, 1999; Frazier, 2007).
The medical management of carbamate poisoning consists of supportive measures
and specific antidotal treatment, that is, the anticholinergic compound atropine
(Rosman et al., 2009). Recovery without medical treatment of cases of accidental
overexposure with various carbamate pesticides spontaneously occurred, generally,
within 4 h of exposure that caused symptoms of headache, dizziness, weakness,
excessive salivation, nausea, or vomiting. For accidental or intentional poisoning
that produced symptoms such as visual disturbances, profuse sweating, abdominal
pain, incoordination, fasciculations, breathing difficulties, or changes in pulse rate,
treatment with atropine combined with general supportive treatment, such as
artificial respiration and administration of fluids, has resulted in recovery of
24
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
individuals within 1 day (Jokanovic, 2009). Deaths occurred only in severe cases
where treatment was delayed and/or insufficient atropine was administered.
Furthermore, oximes have been tested in experimental studies and have been shown
to be beneficial, alone and/or with atropine, in countering the toxicity of the
carbamates isolan, thimetilan, pyramat, dimetilan, aldicarb, neostigmine,
physostigmine, pyridostigmine and others (Dawson, 1995). Only carbaryl toxicity
reacted inversely and was increased by oxime (Dawson, 1995; Jokanovic, 2009).
Rosman et al. (2009) developed a simple decision-making algorithm for the medical
first responders in a mass casualties event (such as the use of carbamates
compounds by terrorists as a weapon), suspected to be caused by a cholinergic
substance (organophosphate or carbamate). According to the proposed algorithm,
treatment should consist of atropine and oxime regardless of the exact toxic
compound involved. They speculated that in a mass casualties event, the benefits of
using oximes outweigh the low level of potential risks (Rosman et al., 2009).
Health problems from pesticides in the absence of acute poisoning are also clinically
important. Several carbamates are rated as probable or possible carcinogens in
humans, according to the classification of USEPA (2004) and the IARC (IARC,
1991). Epidemiologic studies of pesticide exposure and cancer incidence was
recently reviewed by Weichenthal and colleagues (2010). This survey illustrates that
carbamates may induce different types of cancer at occupational levels. For
example, applicators with the highest LDs of exposure to aldicarb demonstrated
high incidence of colon cancer, when compared to nonexposed workers. However,
melanoma was associated to carbaryl exposed applicators.
The evidence available today shows that both men and women can experience
adverse reproductive effects from carbamate pesticides. When women are
sufficiently exposed to certain pesticides, several types of adverse reproductive
outcomes may occur, and developmental problems in their children may result.
According to Frazier (2007), the main adverse reproductive effects associated to
female exposures are neurodevelopmental or childhood behavioral problems
(carbaryl), and possible childhood leukemia (propoxur). However, no significant
effect on gestation, fertility and parturition indices, and average birth weight was
demonstrated on experimental studies with rats exposed to propoxur (Ngoula et al.,
2007). Regarding, male exposures associated with adverse reproductive effects, they
are related with carbaryl, carbosulfan and carbofuran and consist in sperm
aneuploidy and abnormal morphology in manufacturing workers (carbaryl); DNA
fragmentation in men treated for infertility (carbaryl); chromosome aberrations and
abnormal head morphology in mice spermatozoa (carbosulfan, carbofuran) (Giri et
al., 2002; Meeker et al., 2004; Xia et al., 2005).
LEGISLATION
In recent decades, significant analytical developments have been achieved in
pesticide residue analysis and, in many cases, focus has been put towards sample
preparation and analytical detection (Soler et al., 2004). This has allowed maximum
residue limits (MRLs) to become more and more stringent in food commodities and
25
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
in water (Codex alimentarius. 2009; Hamilton et al., 2003). Hamilton et al. (2003),
in a IUPAC Technical Report, presented an interesting overview of regulatory limits
for pesticides in water issued by WHO, Australia, the US, New Zealand, Japan,
Canada, the European Union and Taiwan. The European Union has set new
Directives for pesticides in fruits and vegetables in order to meet health concerns
(Regulation EC no. 396/2005 that introduces changes to the European Directive
91/414/EEC) (European Comission, 2005). Typically, MRLs for carbamates range
from 0.01 0.05 mg/kg depending on the commodity and the pesticide (European
Union, 2008). If a pesticide is not included in any of the above mentioned lists, the
default MRL of 0.01 mg/kg applies (Art 18(1b) of Reg. (EC) No 396/2005).
Recently, regulation (EC) No 901/2009 has been produced concerning a coordinated
multiannual Community control programme for 2010 to 2012 to ensure compliance
with MRLs and to assess the consumer exposure to pesticide residues in and on food
of plant and animal origin (Morais et al., 2011). The Member States shall, during
2010 - 2012 analyze samples for the product/pesticide residue combinations. When
pesticides are applied according to good agricultural practices, MRLs are not
exceeded, but their incorrect application may leave harmful residues, which involve
possible health risk and environmental pollution (Hassanzadeh et al., 2010)
ANALYTICAL METHODS
Pesticides comprise a large group of substances with the only common characteristic
of being effective against a pest and constituting a challenge to the analyst (Soler et
al., 2004; Paíga et al., 2009a, 2009b). Carbamates have been analyzed for various
application areas such as environmental analysis, food safety, toxicology, and
occupational health. Currently, most interest in the analysis of pesticides is in the
field of food safety, thus especially in various types of vegetables and fruits. In
addition, pesticides are analyzed in environmental samples, such as different water
compartments, soil, sediments, sludge, and animal tissue like fish, and in human
body fluids and tissues (Niessen, 2010). The presence of pesticide residues and/or
their degradation products, which sometimes are more toxic than their precursors in
the environment and in foodstuffs, calls for the use of very sensitive analytical
methods, capable of determining these compounds at concentration levels equal or
lower than the MRLs established by international organizations (Crespo-Corral et
al., 2008). Different techniques have been employed for carbamates determination
(Caetano et al., 2008; Wu et al., 2009; Somerset et al., 2011; Van Dyk and
Pletschke, 2011; Llorent-Martínez et al., 2011) but the most efficient approaches
involve the use of chromatographic methods. Liquid chromatography (LC) coupled
with mass spectrometry (LC/MS) is one of the most powerful techniques for
monitoring carbamates that are thermally unstable and hence do not perform well
easily in a gas chromatography MS multimethod (Sagratini et al., 2007; Chung and
Chan, 2010; Park et al., 2010). In particular, it has been shown that, in combination
with tandem mass spectrometry (ion trap or triple quadrupole), LC is a very
sensitive technique to reveal carbamates and other pesticides residues in fruits
(Granby et al., 2004; Soler et al., 2005; Niessen, 2010). Instruments with either
26
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation (APCI) or electrospray ionisation (ESI)
are the most commonly used (Granby et al., 2004; Kruve et al., 2011).
Regarding sample preparation (Chen et al., 2008; Paíga et al., 2009a, 2009b), it
traditionally involves an extraction with an organic solvent such as include matrix
solid-phase dispersion, solid-phase extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, solid-
phase microextraction, stir bar sorptive extraction and more recently the ‘quick,
easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe’ (QuECheRS) method (Anastassiades et al.,
2003; Wilkowska et al., 2011).
Nowadays, several rapid, relatively inexpensive, sensitive screening analytical
biosensors that need little sample pre-treatment are constantly being developed for
the identification and quantification of carbamate compounds (Caetano et al., 2008;
Wu et al., 2009; Somerset et al., 2011; Van Dyk and Pletschke, 2011). Biosensors
are based on the intimate contact between a bio-recognition element that interacts
with the analyte of interest and a transducer element that converts the bio-
recognition event into a measurable signal. Among the different types of biosensors,
the electrochemical sensors are of special interest due to the high sensitivity inherent
to the electrochemical detection and the possibility to miniaturize the required
instrumentation, thereby making the construction of compact and portable analysis
devices possible (Campàs et al., 2009; Somerset et al., 2011). Somerset et al. (2011)
reported detection limit of 0.880 nmol/L for carbaryl, 0.249 nmol/L for carbofuran
and 0.111 nmol/L for methomyl using a mercaptobenzothiazole-on-gold biosensor
system. From the literature reviewed by Van Dyk and Pletschke (2011), the lower
detection limits are also in the range of 0.1 nmol/L (for carbofuran, Ciucu et al.,
2003) being clear that enzymatic methods, and biosensors, usually are not able to
achieve the sensitivity of chromatographic methods. However, authors claimed that
they can serve as a tool for screening of hundreds of samples in a short period of
time complementing the existing methods and allowing for a more rapid assessment
of problematic environments. Each method has unique advantages which can
complement each other (Rodriguez-Mozaz et al., 2007; Van Dyk and Pletschke,
2011).
CARBAMATE BIOMARKERS
Biomonitoring is defined as the repeated, controlled measurement of chemical or
biological markers in fluids, tissues or other accessible samples from subjects
exposed or exposed in the past or to be exposed to chemical, physical or biological
risk factors in the workplace and/or the general environment (Manno et al., 2010).
Some bioindicators are commonly used since they can reflect the effect of
contaminants on cellular metabolism and global homeostasis (Tan et al., 2011).
González-Fernández et al. (2008) focused on a wide range of conventional
biomarkers and explored a preliminary working scheme for the integration of the
triple -omic approach (transcriptomics, proteomics, and metallomics) in
environmental monitoring. These authors found them useful and a comprehensive
alternative in the study of environmental issues and the diagnosis of contamination
threats. The expansion of omic technologies in recent years have contributed to
27
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
occupational environmental health research through the look at the complete
complement of genes its expression and regulation, proteins and metabolites
(Vlaanderen et al., 2010). These authors explored in a well design review the
currently fields (genotyping, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics and
metabolomics) pointing for new insights in the near future. George and Shukla
(2011) provided also a complete review of the research activities in the area of
toxicoproteomics focusing on the effects of carcinogenic pesticides, namely
carbamates. Although these authors considered proteomic technologies as relevant
tools in this domain, other issues were also important to elucidate the sequential
steps of pesticide-induced carcinogenesis (e.g. the analysis of metabolic activation
of chemicals, genome analysis, mRNA measurements, and classical biochemical
analysis). In their point of view a better dialogue among those areas and a
transdiciplinary approach is needed to better understand the impact of these
chemicals on oncology research.
The measurement of current perception threshold (CPT) using Neurometer
CPT/Eagle, on the index finger and the great toe can be used as a biomarker to
monitor the effects of carbamate exposure among exposed workers (Lubis et al.,
2008). By using three neuroselective frequencies range (2000, 250, and 5 Hz) the
CPT values were prominent among farmers on both the medial and peroneal nerves.
Sams and co-workers (2010) proposed the quantification of 5,6-dimethyl-2-
(methylamino)pyrimidin-4-ol (MDHP) in urine, as a sensitive and specific
biomarker of exposure to pirimicarb. Using liquid chromatography with mass
spectrometry detection (LCMS), these authors quantified this secondary metabolite
in urine of exposed volunteers.
The osmotic fragility of erythrocytes as a potential biomarker of oxidative
membrane damage in carbamate pesticide-induced damage to erythrocytes was
recently described (Sharma et al., 2010).
As reported previously, several carbamates may reduce male fertility inducing
alterations on testicular morphology. For this reason, the selection of
histopathological markers is highly dependent upon the toxicant mechanism of
action, dose, and duration of exposure (Moffit et al., 2007). These authors discussed
the example of carbendanzim, a well known Sertoli cell toxicant, which was used to
underline the role of cytoskeleton alterations as markers of testicular injury. These
authors pointed also to multiple histopathological endpoints (e.g. seminiferous
tubule diameter, sloughing and vacuolization of seminiferous epithelium, spermatid
head retention, and germ cell apoptosis) for a better understanding of the the loss of
testicular function.
HUMAN EXPOSURE TO CARBAMATE RESIDUES
The presence of pesticide residues is a concern for consumers because carbamates
are known to have potential harmful effects to other non-targeted organisms than
pests and diseases (Gilden et al., 2010). People have environmental exposures to
pesticides mainly through diet. Human intake due to pesticide residues in food
commodities is usually much higher than those related to water consumption and air
28
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
inhalation (except for occupational exposure or at home application, e.g. home
gardens or the handling with domestic animals). The evaluation of pesticide residues
in food is nowadays a priority objective to ensure food quality and to protect
consumers against possible health risks (Sagratini et al., 2007).
Fruits and vegetables are important components of the human diet since they
provide essential nutrients that are required for most of the reactions occurring in the
body. A high intake of fruits and vegetables (five or more servings per day) has
been encouraged not only to prevent consequences due to vitamin deficiency but
also to reduce the incidence of major diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular
diseases and obesity (Keikotlhaile et al., 2011). Contamination of fruits and
vegetables may result from treatment as well as from conditions such as improper
use of pesticides, residues from preceding treatments in the soil and cross-
contamination (particularly during harvesting) (Janssen, 1997; Shi et al., 2011). Due
to their high solubility in water, carbamates are distributed in aqueous food such as
fruit and related derivatives. Sources of residues in products of animal origin include
contaminated water or feed, pesticide-treated housing, and contaminated milk.
Carbaryl is one of the residues most frequently reported in previous studies (Rawn
et al., 2006; Paíga et al., 2009a, 2009b; Jensen et al., 2009; Hassanzadeh et al.,
2010). Carbaryl controls a great number of species of insects on fruits, and other
crops, forests, as well as on poultry, farm animals, and pets (US EPA, 2003).
Hassanzadeh et al. (2010) studied the residue content of carbaryl applied on
greenhouse cucumbers from Iran and its reduction by duration of a pre-harvest
interval and post-harvest household processing. Carbaryl residues were detected in
concentration ranges of 0.224.91 mg/kg indicating that residues in cucumber were
higher than its European Union MRL (0.05 mg/kg) value 14 days after application.
They suggested that a waiting period of more than 14 days should be observed
before harvesting or consumption of cucumbers, in order to protect consumer health.
They concluded that household processing, such as washing and peeling and
refrigeration storage, was effective in reducing the carbaryl residue levels being
peeling the most effective way to reduce the carbaryl residues of the cucumber
samples.
Paíga et al. (2009a) analyzed a total number of 28 different fresh tomato samples
and 6 processed tomato products from different locations in Northern Portugal.
Although S-ethyl-N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC) was not authorized for use in
tomato cultures, it was detected in all fresh samples at the estimated level of about 4
g/kg. Butylate was detected in tomato pulp and tinned tomato, at estimated levels
of 4 g/kg.
Caldas et al. (2011) characterized the dietary risks of organophosphorus and
dithiocarbamate pesticides in a total diet study at a Brazilian university restaurant.
They observed that dithiocarbamat reach a value of 0.08 mg/kg corresponding to an
intake by fruit consumption of 0.112 µg/kg body weight per day.
Kobayashi et al. (2011) performed a survey of pesticide residues in 595 imported
frozen products on the Tokyo market from April 1989 to March 2008. Carbaryl was
detected in berries (blueberry, raspberry and strawberry) and methomyl in okra and
spinach at the level of 0.005-0.01 mg/kg.
29
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Jensen et al. (2009) assessed the cumulative acute exposure of the population of
Denmark to 25 organophosphorus and carbamate pesticide residues from the
consumption of fruit, vegetables and cereals. Residue data obtained from the Danish
monitoring programme carried out in the period 20042007, which included 6704
samples of fruit, vegetables and cereals were used in the calculations. Exotic fruits,
including passion fruit, mango, guava, carambola, kaki, rambutan and kumquat had
the highest detection frequency (13.9%), followed by cherry (12.5%), mandarin
(9.9%), lemon (8.6%), asparagus (7.7%), peach/nectarines (7.6%), rice (7.3%),
grapefruit (6.9%), and pineapple (6.9%). Commodities with the highest mean
concentrations were basil followed by lemon, grapefruit, dates, oranges and
mandarin. Carbaryl was detected at concentrations ranging from 0.0018 mg/kg (in
mushrooms) to 0.1369 mg/kg (in grape table) Jensen et al. (2009).
Rawn et al. (2006) determined seven parent N-methyl carbamate insecticides, in
addition to two transformation products of aldicarb (aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb
sulfone), and a single transformation product of carbofuran (3-hydroxycarbofuran)
in infant and junior foods available on the Canadian retail market between 2001 and
2003. Carbaryl was the most frequently (7.6%) detected compound and
concentrations ranged from 0.6 to 18 ng/g. Detectable levels of carbaryl were most
frequently found in foods prepared with fruit. Methomyl was detected (0.8 ng/g) in
one chicken with broth sample analyzed in the present study. In all cases, the
concentrations observed were orders of magnitude below the maximum residue
limits established for these compounds in the corresponding raw food commodities
in Canada (Rawn et al., 2006). Dietary intakes of carbaryl and methomyl based on
the consumption of infant foods tested ranged between 0.2343 and 0.42.0 ng/kg
body weight per day, respectively (Rawn et al., 2006). These authors (Rawn et al.
2004) also quantified the N-methyl carbamate concentrations for apple and grape
juices available on the retail market in Canada. Carbaryl was the most frequently
(58.6%) detected carbamate in juice samples studied. It was observed more
frequently in grape juices than in apple or mixed juices. Oxamyl and methomyl
were detected in apple juice samples, although they were below detection limits in
all grape and mixed juice samples analysed. Maximum levels of carbaryl, methomyl
and oxamyl were 93, 6.7 and 4.6 ng/L, respectively.
Kumari et al. (2004) reported the monitoring of pesticidal contamination of
farmgate vegetables from Hisar, India. A total of 84 farm gate samples of seasonal
vegetables was analyzed for organophosphates, synthetic pyrethroids,
organochlorines and carbamates. Only aldicarb among the carbamates was detected
in potato (at the range of 0.003-0.082 µg/g).
RISK ASSESSMENT
Common exposed professionals include pesticide applicators, and harvesting crops,
and farmers. However, humans may be also exposed to carbamates through over-
exposure at home application (e.g. home gardens, the handling with domestic
animals). Biological and environmental monitoring are the main tools presently
available for the “in-the-field” pesticide risk assessment, although some limitations
30
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
must be considered, since effective activities occurs in an open air (Colosio et al.,
2011). For this reason, Colosio et al. (2011) developed an integrated user-friendly
tool for risk assessment and management in agriculture, in which the computational
modelling was added to biological, and environmental monitoring.
Most of the population may be exposed to carbamates through dietary (e.g.
consumption of treated fruits, vegetables and contaminated water) (Lu et al., 2010).
Hazard characterization involves comparing the pesticide exposure concentration
with the ADI or the ARfD (the estimate of the amount of a substance in food that
can be ingested over a short period of time, usually during one meal or one day,
without appreciable health risk to the consumer) (WHO 1997; Keikotlhaile et al.,
2011). In exposure assessment, the potential intake or consumption of pesticide
residues is divided by the body weight and compared to ADI or ARfD (Exposure =
(Concentration of pesticide residue x Food consumed)/ body weight) (Keikotlhaile
et al., 2011).
Long-term averaged daily intake of contaminants such as pesticide residues in food
may be estimated using NORMTOX (Ragas and Huijbregts, 1998; Ragas et al.,
2009). Schulte-Oehlmann et al. (2011) reviewed the monitoring data over a 10-year
period and revealed that although the percentage of foodstuff without detectable
pesticide residues in Germany has continuously decreased from 64 to 51.5%, for
carbaryl ARfDs were exceeded substantially. Among other pesticides, carbamates
were also rated as endocrine-active factors (Schulte-Oehlmann et al., 2011). In view
of the probable health risk of a wide range of pesticides, a new EU regulation is
being prepared, including the test criteria for these chemicals to be finalized by
2013.
Humans are sequentially or simultaneously exposed to a wide range of pollutants,
instead to only one. Due to the main limitations and complex approach to certainly
evaluate the health effects of complex mixtures few studies were undertaken to
explore this complexity. Recently, Ragas and co-workers (2011) have investigated
the cumulative health risk effects of a wide range of stressors, including pesticides,
on different target groups (young children, working adults and elderly). This survey
was based on the time spent in different microenvironments, the outdoor movement,
and food consumption patterns. Different scenarios for assessing mixture effects for
a better understanding of mechanism of action, and interactions (antagonistic or
synergistic) were considered. In conclusion, this review underlines the need for
person-oriented exposure models that can simulate the cumulative exposure history
of individuals based on realistic activity and consumption patterns; in addition, a
better mechanistic understanding of the effects of cumulative stressors is relevant.
CONCLUSIONS
The increase of carbamate applications makes the implications for the
environmental and biomedical research communities a significant endeavor. Diet,
and principally fruit and fruit juices, is the major carbamates source for non-
occupationally exposed population. The dietary acute intake of some carbamates
(AChE inhibitors) as previously evaluated by the FAO/WHO Joint Meeting on
31
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Pesticide Residues indicated a possible risk to health, which has restrained the
Codex Alimentarius Committee from setting a maximum residue level for many of
these compounds. As already stated by other authors (Van Dyk and Pletschke,
2011), an effective strategy for dealing with pesticide contamination in the
environment has to commence with an assessment of the extent of the problem.
However, monitoring programs for pesticides are scarce, particularly in developing
countries. Furthermore, more research is needed in order to characterize the
cumulative and synergistic effects of these pesticides, as well as, the interaction
among those contaminants and other pollutants.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Authors wish to the Research Centre on Ceramic and Composite Materials
(CICECO) from Aveiro University. This work was also supported by the Fundação
para a Ciência e a Tecnologia through the grant no. PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011.
REFERENCES
Amanullah M, and Hari BY (2011). Evaluation of carbamate insecticides as
chemotherapeutic agents for cancer”, Indian J Cancer, 48, pp 74-79.
Anastassiades M, Lehotay S J, Stajnbaher D, and Schenck FJ (2003). “Fast and easy
multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and dispersive
solid-phase extraction for the determination of pesticide residues in produce”, J
AOAC International, 86, pp 412-431.
Balme KH, Roberts JC, Glasstone M, Curling L, Rother HA, London L, Zar H, and
Mann MD (2010). Pesticide poisonings at a tertiary children's hospital in South
Africa: an increasing problem”, Clin Toxicol (Phila), 48(9), pp 928-934.
Caetano J and Machado SAS (2008). “Determination of carbaryl in tomato in natura
using an amperometric biosensor based on the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase
activity”, Sensors and Actuators B, 129, pp 40-46.
Caldas ED, De Souza MV, and Jardim ANO (2011). Dietary risk assessment of
organophosphorus and dithiocarbamate pesticides in a total diet study at a Brazilian
university restaurant”, Food Addit Contam, Vol 28, No 1, pp 71-79.
Campàs M, Prieto-Simón B and Marty J-L (2009). A review of the use of
genetically engineered enzymes in electrochemical biosensors”, Semin Cell Dev
Biol, 20, pp 3-9.
Chen Y, Guo Z, Wang X, and Qiu C (2008). “Sample preparation: a Review”, J
Chromatogr A, 1084, pp 191-219.
32
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Chung SWC and Chan BTP (2010). “Validation and use of a fast sample
preparation method and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in
analysis of ultra-trace levels of 98 organophosphorus pesticide and carbamate
residues in a total diet study involving diversified food types”, J Chromatogr A,
1217, pp 4815-4824.
Ciucu, AA, Negulescu C, and Baldwin RP (2003). “Detection of pesticides using an
amperometric biosensor based on ferophthalocyanine chemically modified carbon
paste electrode and immobilized bienzymatic system”, Biosens, Bioelectron, 18, pp
303-310.
Codex alimentarius. (2009). Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides, available in
http://www.codexalimentarius.net.
Colosio C, Rubino FM, Alegakis A, Ariano E, Brambilla G, Mandic-Rajcevic S,
Metruccio F, Minoia C, Moretto A, Somaruga C, Tsatsakis A, Turci R, and Vellere
F (2011). “Integration of biological monitoring, environmental monitoring and
computational modelling into the interpretation of pesticide exposure data:
Introduction to a proposed approach”, Toxicol Lett,
doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.08.018.
Crespo-Corral E, Santos-Delgado MJ, Polo-Diez LM and Soria AC (2008).
“Determination of carbamate, phenylurea and phenoxy acid herbicide residues by
gas chromatography after potassium tert-butoxide/dimethyl sulphoxide/ethyl iodide
derivatization reaction”, J Chromatogr A, 1209, pp 22-28.
Dawson RM (1995). “Oxime effects on the rate constants of carbamylation and
decarbamylation of acetylcholinesterase for pyridine, physostigmine and insecticidal
carbamates”, Neurochem, 26, pp 643-654.
Ecobichon DJ (2001). “Carbamate insecticides”, Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology,
Academic Press, Krieger, San Diego, pp 1087-1106.
El-Naggar Ael-R, Abdalla MS, El-Sebaey AS and Badawy SM (2009). Clinical
findings and cholinesterase levels in children of organophosphates and carbamates
poisoning. Eur J Pediatr, 168(8), pp 951-956.
Erdman AR (2003). “Pesticides—insecticides” In: Dart RC, Medical toxicology. 3rd
ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp 1487-1492.
European Comission Regulation (2005) No. 396/2005 of the European Parliament
and of the Council, Brussels, Off. J. Eur. Union L70, 3rd, pp 1-16.
European Union, MRLs sorted by pesticide. European Union (2008). [Online]
Available: http://ec.europa.eu/sanco pesticides/public/index.cfm.
33
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Frazier L M MD, MPH (2007). “Reproductive Disorders Associated with Pesticide
Exposure”, J Agromedicine, 12:1, pp 27-37.
George J and Shukla Y (2011). “Pesticides and cancer: Insights into
toxicoproteomic-based findings”, J Proteomics 74(12) pp, 2713-2722.
Giri S, Giri A, Sharma GD, and Prasad SB (2002). “Mutagenic effects of
carbosulfan, a carbamate pesticide”, Mutat Res, 26, 519 (1-2), pp 75-82.
González-Fernández M, García-Barrera T, Jurado J, Prieto-Álamo M J, Pueyo C,
Juan López-Barea, and Gómez-Ariza J L (2008). Integrated application of
transcriptomics, proteomics, and metallomics in environmental studies”, Pure Appl
Chem, Vol 80, No 12, pp 2609-2626.
Granby K, Andersen JH, and Christensen HB (2004). “Analysis of pesticides in fruit,
vegetables and cereals using methanolic extraction and detection by liquid
chromatographytandem mass spectrometry”, Anal Chim Acta, 520, pp 165176.
Hamilton D J, Ambrus A, Dieterle R M, Felsot A S, Harris C A, Holland PT,
Katayama A, Kuriharan N, Linders J, Unsworth J, and Wong SS (2003).
Regulatory limits for pesticide residues in water” (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure
Appl Chem 75 (8), pp 1123-1155.
Hassanzadeh N, Bahramifara N, and Esmaili-Saria A (2010). “Residue content of
carbaryl applied on greenhouse cucumbers and its reduction by duration of a pre-
harvest interval and post-harvest household processing”, J Sci Food Agric, 90, pp
2249-2253.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC; 1991) Working Group.
Occupational exposures in spraying and application of insecticides. IARC Monogr
Eval Carcinog Risk Chem Hum;53, pp 4592.
International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS, 1986), Environmental Health
Criteria 64, Carbamate Pesticides: a General Introduction, World Health
Organization, Geneva,
http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc64.htm#subsectionnumber:1.1.7.
Janssen MMT (1997). “Contaminants In: Food Safety and Toxicity”, Vries, J. (Ed.),
CRC Press LLC, ISBN 0-8493-9488-0, first edition, Boca Raton, USA, pp. 61-71.
Jayashree M, and Singhi S. (2011). “Changing trends and predictors of outcome in
patients with acute poisoning admitted to the intensive careJ Trop Pediatr, 57(5),
pp 340-346.
34
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Jensen BH, Petersen A, and Christensen T (2009). “Probabilistic assessment of the
cumulative dietary acute exposure of the population of Denmark to
organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides”, Food Addit Contam, Vol 26, No 7, pp
1038-104.
Jensen HK, Konradsen F, Jørs E, Petersen JH, and Dalsgaard A (2010). Pesticide
Use and Self-Reported Symptoms of Acute Pesticide Poisoning among Aquatic
Farmers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, J Toxicol, 2011; Doi 10.1155/2011/639814.
Jokanovic M (2009). “Medical treatment of acute poisoning with organophosphorus
and carbamate pesticides, Toxicol Lett, 190, pp 107-115.
Jokanovic M, and Maksimovic M (1997). “Abnormal cholinesterase activity:
understandingand interpretation”, Eur. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 35, pp 11-16.
Keikotlhaile B M, and Spanoghe P (2011). Chapter 13-Pesticide Residues in Fruits
and Vegetables, in Pesticides - Strategies for Pesticides Analysis” (Ed. Margarita
Stoytcheva; ISBN: 978-953-307-460-3), InTech, Rijeka, pp 243-252.
Kobayashi M, Ohtsuka K, Tamura, Y, Tomizawa S, Kamijo K, Iwakoshi K,
Kageyama Y, Nagayama T, and Takano I (2011). “Survey of Pesticide Residues in
Imported Frozen Vegetables and Fruits (1989-2008)”, J Food Hyg, Soc. Japan, pp
121-129.
Kruve A, Haapala M, Saarela V, Franssila S, Kostiainen R, Kotiaho T, and Ketola
RA (2011). “Feasibility of capillary liquid chromatography-microchip-atmospheric
pressure photoionization-mass spectrometry for pesticide analysis in tomato”, Anal
Chim Acta, 696, pp 77-83.
Kumari B, Madan VK, Singh J, Singh S, and Kathpal TS (2004). “Monitoring of
pesticidal contamination of farm gate vegetables from hisar”, Environ Monit Assess,
90, pp 65-71.
Llorent-Martínez EJ, Ortega-Barrales P, Fernández-de Córdova ML, and Ruiz-
Medina A, (2011). “Trends in flow-based analytical methods applied to pesticide
detection: A review”, Analy Chim Acta, 684, pp 30-39.
Lu C, Schenck FJ, Pearson MA, and Wong JW (2010). Assessing children's dietary
pesticide exposure: direct measurement of pesticide residues in 24-hr duplicate food
samples”, Environ Health Perspect, 118, pp 1625-1630.
Lubis, SH, El Sersi, M, Hussein, SH, Sakian, NI, Salleh, R, Rafai, J, and Al
Khamesey K. (2008). “A biomarker for exposure to organophosphate and carbamate
pesticides”, Asia Pac J Public Health, Vol 20, pp162-165.
35
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Manno M, Viau C, Cocker J, Colosio C, Lowry L, Mutti A, Nordberg M, and Wang
S (2010). Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA)”,
Toxicol Lett, 192, pp 3-16.
Meeker JD, Singh NP, Ryan L, Duty SM, Barr DB, Herrick RF, Bennett DH, and
Hauser R. (2004). “Urinary levels of insecticide metabolites and DNA damage in
human sperm”, Hum Reprod, 19 (11), pp 2573-2580.
Moffit JS, Bryant BH, Hall SJ, and Boekelheide K (2007). “Dose-Dependent Effects
of Sertoli Cell Toxicants 2,5-Hexanedione, Carbendazim, and Mono-(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate in Adult Rat Testis”, Toxicol Pathol, 35, pp 719-727.
Morais S, Correia M, Domingues V and Delerue-Matos C (2011). “Chapter 10 -
Urea Pesticides”, in Pesticides - Strategies for Pesticides Analysis” (Ed. Margarita
Stoytcheva; ISBN: 978-953-307-460-3), InTech, Rijeka, pp 241-262.
Ngoula F, Watcho P, Bouseko TS, Kenfack A, Tchoumboué J, and Kamtchouing P
(2007). Effects of propoxur on the reproductive system of male rats”, Afr J Reprod
Health, 11(1), pp 125-132.
Niessen WMA (2010). “Group-specific fragmentation of pesticides and related
compounds in liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry”, J Chromatogr A,
1217, pp 4061-4070.
Paiga P, Morais S, Correia M, Alves A, and Delerue-Matos C (2009a). “ Screening
of Carbamates and Ureas in Fresh and Processed Tomato Samples using
Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Liquid Chromatography”, Anal Lett, 42, pp
265-283.
Paiga P, Morais S, Correia M, Delerue-Matos C, and Alves A (2009b).
“Determination of carbamate and urea pesticide residues in fresh vegetables using
microwave-assisted extraction and liquid chromatography”, Int J Environ Anal
Chem, 89, pp 199-210.
Park S, Lee SJ, Kim HG, Jeong WY, Shim J-H, Abd El-Aty AM, Jeong SW, Lee
WS, Kim ST and Shin SC (2010). “Residue analysis of multi-class pesticides in
watermelon by LC-MS/MS, J Sep Sci, 33, pp 493-501.
Ragas Ad MJ, Huijbregts MAJ, Jong IH, and Leuven RSEW (2009). “Uncertainty
in environmental risk assessment: implications for risk-based management of river
basins”, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5(1), pp 27-37.
Ragas Ad MJ, Oldenkamp R, Preeker NL, Wernicke J, and Schlink U (2011).
Cumulative risk assessment of chemical exposures in urban environments”,
Environm Internat, 37, pp 872-881.
36
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Ragas AMJ, and Huijbregts MAJ (1998). Evaluating the coherence between
environmental quality objectives and the acceptable or tolerable daily intake”,
Regul. Toxicol. Toxicol. Pharmacol, 27, pp 251-264.
Rawn DFK, Roscoe V, Krakalovich T, and Hanson C (2004). “N-methyl carbamate
concentrations and dietary intake estimates for apple and grape juices available on
the retail market in Canada”, Food Addit Contam, 21, pp 555-563.
Rawn DFK, Roscoe V, Trelka R, Hanson C, Krakalovich T, and Dabeka RW
(2006). “N-methyl carbamate pesticide residues in conventional and organic infant
foods available on the Canadian retail market, 2001–03”, Food Additives and
Contaminants, 23(7), pp 651-659.
Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Lopez de Alda MJ, and Barcelo D (2007). “Advantages and
limitations of on-line solid phase extraction coupled to liquid chromatographymass
spectrometry technologies versus biosensors for monitoring of emerging
contaminants in water”, J Chromatogr A, 1152, pp 97-115.
Rosman Y, Makarovsky I, Bentur Y, Shrot S, Dushnistky T, and Krivoy A (2009).
“Carbamate poisoning: treatment recommendations in the setting of a mass
casualties event”, Am J Emerg Med, 27, pp 1117-1124.
Sagratini G, Mañes J, Giardiná D, Damiani P, and Picó Y (2007). Analysis of
carbamate and phenylurea pesticide residues in fruit juices by solid-phase
microextraction and liquid chromatographymass spectrometry, J Chromatogr A,
1147, 135-143.
Sams C, Patel K, and Kate Jones K (2010). Biological monitoring for exposure to
pirimicarb: Method development and a human oral dosing study”, Toxicol Letters,
Vol 192, pp 56-60.
Schulte-Oehlmann U, Oehlmann J, and Keil F (2011). Before the curtain falls:
endocrine-active pesticides--a German contamination legacy”, Rev Environ Contam
Toxicol, 213, pp 137-159.
Sharma B, Rai DK, Rai PK, Rizvi SI, and Watal G (2010). “Determination of
erythrocyte fragility as a marker of pesticide-induced membrane oxidative damage”,
Methods Mol Biol, Vol 594, pp123-128.
Shi R, Jungang LV, and Feng J (2011). Assessment of Pesticide Pollution in
Suburban Soil in South Shenyang, China, Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 87, pp
567-573.
Soler C, Mañes J, and Picó Y, (2004). Liquid chromatographyelectrospray
quadrupole ion-trap mass spectrometry of nine pesticides in fruits”, J Chromatogr
A, Vol 1048, 1-3 pp 41-49.
37
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Soler C, Mañes J, and Picó Y, (2005). “Routine application using single quadrupole
liquid chromatographymass spectrometry to pesticides analysis in citrus fruit”, J
Chromatogr A, Vol 1088, 1-2, pp 224-233.
Somerset V, Baker P, and Iwuoha E (2011). Chapter 9 - Mercaptobenzothiazole-on-
Gold Organic Phase Biosensor Systems: 3. Thick-Film Biosensors for
Organophosphate and Carbamate Pesticide Determination, in Pesticides - Strategies
for Pesticides Analysis” (Ed. Margarita Stoytcheva; ISBN: 978-953-307-460-3),
InTech, Rijeka, pp 185-204.
Tan F, Wang L, Wang J, Wu X, Zhu H, Jiang L, Tao S, Zhao K, Yang Y, and Tang
X (2011). “Enhanced pesticide sensitivity of novel housefly actylcholinesterases: A
new tool for the detection of residual pesticide contamination”, Bioprocess Biosyst
Eng, 34, pp 305-314.
Thompson H M (1999). “Esterases as Markers of Exposure to Organophosphates
and Carbamates”, Ecotoxicology, 8, pp 369-384.
Tomlin, CDS, eds. (1997). The Pesticide Manual, 11th ed. Surrey, UK: British Crop
Protection Council.
US Environmental Protection Agency (1992). National Survey of Pesticides in
Drinking Water Wells, Phase II Report, EPA 570/8-91-020, National Technical
Information Service, Springfield, VA.
US Environmental Protection Agency (1999). Reigart JR, Roberts JR. Recognition
and Management of Pesticide Poisonings. Washington DC: Office of Pesticide
Programs. Available from:
http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/safety/healthcare/handbook/handbook.pdf
US Environmental Protection Agency (2003). Interim Reregistration Eligibility
Decision for Carbaryl. Case 0080. Washington, DC.
US Environmental Protection Agency (2004). Office of Pesticide Programs, Health
Effects Division, Science Information Management Branch. Chemicals evaluated
for carcinogenic potential.
Van Dyk J, Pletschke B (2011). “Review on the use of enzymes for the detection of
organochlorine, organophosphate and carbamate pesticides in the environment”,
Chemosphere, 82, pp 291-307.
Vlaanderen, J, Moore, LE, Smith, MT, Qing Lan, Luoping Zhang, Skibola, CF,
Rothman, N, and Vermeulen, R. (2010). “Application of Omics Technologies in
Occupational and Environmental Health Research; Current Status and Projections”.
Occup Environ Med, Vol 67, pp 136-143.
38
AcademyPublish.org - The Impact of Pesticides
Weichenthal S, Moase C, and Chan P (2010). A Review of Pesticide Exposure and
Cancer Incidence in the Agricultural Health Study Cohort”, Environ Health
Perspect, 118, pp 1117-1125.
WHO (1997). Guidelines for predicting dietary intake of pesticide residues. WHO,
Switzerland.
Wilkowska A, and Biziuk M (2011). “Determination of pesticide residues in food
matrices using the QuEChERS methodology: Review”, Food Chem, 125, pp 803-
812.
Wu HZ, Lee YC, Lin TK, Shih HC, Chang FL, and Lin HPP (2009). “Development
of an amperometric micro-biodetector for pesticide monitoring and detection”, J
Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, Vol 40, 2 pp 113-122.
Xia Y, Cheng S, Bian Q, Xu L, Collins MD, Chang HC, Song L, Liu J, Wang S, and
Wang X (2005). “Genotoxic effects on spermatozoa of carbaryl-exposed workers”,
Toxicol Sci, 85(1), pp 615-623.
... However, the toxicity symptoms subsided after 24 to 48 h in carbamateinduced intoxication as compared to organophosphates. This is because during the phosphorylation of organophosphates to acetylcholinesterase carbamatecholinesterase bond hydrolyse rapidly within hours [28][29][30]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Toxicology, rooted in ancient civilizations and evolving through pivotal historical figures like Paracelsus and Alice Hamilton, has become a multidisciplinary field encompassing various branches such as pharmacology, medical, forensic, and environmental toxicology. This exploration embarks on a journey through time and science, unravelling the intricate interplay between chemicals, pollutants, and their profound impacts on human, animal, and environmental well-being. Spanning from ancient practices like the use of hemlock in Greek capital punishment to modern-day concerns surrounding industrial chemicals and pesticides, the review delves into the mechanisms by which toxins disrupt biochemical pathways and induce organ dysfunctions. From heavy metals and pesticides persistent effects on the nervous and reproductive systems to the carcinogenic properties of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The review highlights the diverse range of toxicants and their widespread impact on human health. Additionally, the review underscores the importance of proactive measures to mitigate exposure to harmful substances, advocating for the development of antidotes, bioremediation techniques, and stricter environmental regulations. By addressing the urgent need for comprehensive strategies to combat toxicological hazards, this review aims to contribute to ongoing efforts to safeguard public health and environmental sustainability in the face of evolving chemical threats.
... them in their priority list (Boujelbane et al., 2022) because they are probable carcinogens for humans. Several studies revealed carbamates as responsible for altering the normal functioning of neurological, reproductive and immune systems (Morais et al., 2012). They are also highly toxic to birds, fish and benthic macroinvertebrates (Guarda et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Groundwater is an important source for drinking water supply, agricultural irrigation and industrial uses in the Middle East and North Africa region. Due to the growing need for groundwater use, groundwater quality studies on the presence of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) and pesticides have gained attention. The Wadi El Bey is one of the most polluted areas in Tunisia. However, very limited data on CECs infiltration into aquifers has been described, in comparison to industrialized countries where groundwater contamination has been comprehensively addressed. To gain early insight into potential contamination, groundwater wells in northeast Tunisia, an area with high population density and intensive agricultural activity were sampled during two seasons and were analyzed with two high resolution mass spectrometry approaches: target and suspect screening. The latter was used for screening banned pesticides. A selection of 116 CECs of which 19 are transformation products (TPs) and 20 pesticides previously prioritized by suspect screening were screened in the groundwater samples. The results showed the presence of 69 CECs and 1 TP and 20 pesticides at concentrations per well, ranging between 43 and 7384 ng L−1 and 7.3 and 80 ng L−1, respectively. CECs concentrations in Tunisian groundwater do not differ from those in industrialized countries. WWTPs were considered the main source of pollution, where the main classes detected were analgesics, antihypertensives and artificial sweeteners and especially caffeine, salicylic acid and ibuprofen were found to be ubiquitous. Regarding pesticides, triazines herbicides and carbamates insecticides pose the highest concern due to their ubiquitous presence, high leachability potential for most of them and high toxicity. The environmental risk assessment (ERA) highlighted the high risk that caffeine, ibuprofen, and propoxur may pose to the environment, and consequently, to non-target organisms. This study provides occurrence and ERA analysis of CECs and pesticides in Tunisian groundwater.
... them in their priority list (Boujelbane et al., 2022) because they are probable carcinogens for humans. Several studies revealed carbamates as responsible for altering the normal functioning of neurological, reproductive and immune systems (Morais et al., 2012). They are also highly toxic to birds, fish and benthic macroinvertebrates (Guarda et al., 2020). ...
... These days, this pesticide is used on a number of agricultural crops to eliminate a wide range of pests and insects, such as moths, beetles, cockroaches, ants, ticks, and mosquitoes [3]. Carbaryl is classified as a highly hazardous substance because it inhibits the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme after repeated exposure over an extended period of time, primarily through ingestion and inhalation [4]. The damaging properties of pesticides after human ingestion of pesticides contaminated food lead to a variety of issues which needs to be addressed. ...
Article
Conventional spectroscopic methods like IR, and Raman are not very effective at detecting low levels of pesticides or harmful chemicals in food matrices. A quick, highly accurate approach that can identify pesticides present in different food products at lower levels must be developed in order to address this problem and ensure food safety. In this study, a highly sensitive and uniform wafer-scale Au nanogap surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrate was used for the quantitative analysis of carbaryl pesticide levels in standard solution, mango juice, and milk samples using chemometrics. Carbaryl was detected up to 3 ppb concentration levels for all three group of samples. However, due to the higher sensitivity, uniformity, and enhancement factors of the SERS substrate used in this investigation, the limit of detection (LOD) values for the standard solution, mango juice, and milk were 0.37 ppb, 0.57 ppb, and 0.15 ppb at 1380 cm−1, 1380 cm−1, and 1364 cm−1 wavenumber ranges. In order to predict different carbaryl concentrations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 ppb), the variable importance in projection (VIP) method combined with partial least squares regression (PLSR) and attained the coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.994, 0.989, and 0.978 along with minimum root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.112, 0.190, and 0.278 ppb for the prediction datasets. Furthermore, PLS-DA was able to distinguish between pure and adulterated samples with the highest classification accuracy of 100 % for a standard solution, and mango juice and 94.4 % for milk samples. Considering this, we can conclude that the SERS Au Nanogap substrate can rapidly and effectively detect carbaryl pesticides quantitatively and qualitatively in mango juice and milk.
... However, in mustard leaf, for 12 DAA, the residue level kept increasing sharply, and on 15 DAA, the residue level was found just below the critical point. The waiting period of Carbofuran was observed 15 days (Morais et al., 2012). In the case of Broccoli, the residue level kept increasing for 9 DAA when it was applied with stickers, and on 12 DAA, the vegetable was safe to consume. ...
Article
Full-text available
Insecticides applied on food crops and vegetables reduce the pest population and leave chemical residues that may result in serious health consequences. In Nepalese context, farmers use pesticides repeatedly to get rid of pests and also don’t consider the waiting period. The study was conducted to evaluate the amount of pesticide residue after application of different organophosphate and carbamate insecticides in vegetable crops. Five insecticides were used in seven different combinations (Dimethoate, Malathion, dichlorvos, Chlorpyriphos, Dimethoate + dichlorvos, Malathion + Chlorpyriphos and Carbofuran) and applied in mustard and broccoli. The residues were assessed using the “Rapid Bioassay of Pesticide Residue technique”. Results exhibited that Chlorpyriphos treated mustard leaves were edible in 3 DAA (Days after application) and in 6 DAA when sticker was applied with treatment. With or without sticker Dimethoate followed by Malathion applied mustard leaves were edible in 6 DAA. With or without sticker Dichlorvos took longest (12 DAA) to reach the safe limits for mustard leaves. In contrary the Dichlorvos treated broccoli was edible in 3 DAA but took 6 DAA when sticker was applied. Malathion treated broccoli, with and without sticker, was edible in 6 DAA. For both crops Carbofuran exhibited anomalous nature showing lower residue level in the beginning and higher later. When both vegetables were applied treatments with stickers, they showed significantly higher residue and longer time to reach edible limit. The applied insecticides took relatively longer to reach safe level in mustard leaf as compared to broccoli. The study suggests use of Chlorpyriphos for mustard leaves and Malathion for broccoli with at least 6 days of waiting period, with or without use of sticker.
... These days, this pesticide is used on a number of agricultural crops to eliminate a wide range of pests and insects, such as moths, beetles, cockroaches, ants, ticks, and mosquitoes [3]. Carbaryl is classified as a highly hazardous substance because it inhibits the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme after repeated exposure over an extended period of time, primarily through ingestion and inhalation [4]. The damaging properties of pesticides after human ingestion of pesticides contaminated food lead to a variety of issues which needs to be addressed. ...
... headaches, dizziness, fatigue, eye and skin irritation) and long-term health problems (e.g. cancer, cardiovascular complications, neurological and reproductive system disorders (Frazier 2007;Morais et al. 2012;Gupta et al. 2017;Kim et al. 2017;Chetty-Mhlanga et al. 2021;El-Nahhal and El-Nahhal 2021). ...
Article
Toddlers in agricultural areas may be athave risk from pesticide exposure . A cross-sectional study was conducted with 130 toddlers and their caregivers. Face-to-face interviews were done to gather information about exposure factors. A wipe sampling technique was used to collect carbamate residues on each toddler’s hands and feet. Results showed that there were carbamate residues on all wipe samples (100%), with a median concentration of 30.47 micrograms per sample (hands and feet). Carbamate residues detected on toddlers’ hands and feetwere significantly associated (p < 0.05) with many factors, including the toddlers’ relationships with caregivers, the education level of caregivers, the household incomes, the gender of toddlers, the frequency of following caregivers to farms, the frequency of foot washing, daytime activities, and playing durations. The health risk from dermal carbamate exposurewas above the acceptable range (HI = 3.244). Preventive measures should be considered to reduce toddlers’ pesticide exposure in agricultural areas.
Article
Full-text available
Phenolic compounds (PhCs) are ubiquitously distributed phytochemicals found in many plants, body fluids, food items, medicines, pesticides, dyes, etc. Many PhCs are priority pollutants that are highly toxic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic. Some of these are present in body fluids and affect metabolism, while others possess numerous bioactive properties such as retaining antioxidant and antimicrobial activity in plants and food products. Therefore, there is an urgency for developing an effective, rapid, sensitive, and reliable tool for the analysis of these PhCs to address their environmental and health concern. In this context, carbonaceous nanomaterials have emerged as a promising material for the fabrication of electrochemical biosensors as they provide remarkable characteristics such as lightweight, high surface: volume, excellent conductivity, extraordinary tensile strength, and biocompatibility. This review outlines the current status of the applications of carbonaceous nanomaterials (CNTs, graphene, etc.) based enzymatic electrochemical biosensors for the detection of PhCs. Efforts have also been made to discuss the mechanism of action of the laccase enzyme for the detection of PhCs. The limitations, advanced emerging carbon-based material, current state of artificial intelligence in PhCs detection, and future scopes have also been summarized.
Article
Bu çalışmada karbamatlı bir pestisit olan bendiocarb’ın (BND) ratların testis dokusunda oluşturabileceği histopatolojik değişiklikler, antioksidan enzim aktiviteleri ve malondialdehit (MDA) miktarındaki değişimler üzerine Vit. C ve E’nin koruyucu etkisi araştırılmıştır. Ratlar sekiz gruba ayrılmıştır; 1. grup: kontrol grubu, 2. grup: Vit. C (100 mg kg-1 gün-1 ), 3. grup: Vit. E (100 mg kg-1 gün-1 ), 4. grup: Vit. C+ E, 5. grup: BND (0.8 mg kg-1 gün-1 ), 6. grup: BND+Vit. C, 7. grup: BND +Vit. E ve 8. grup: BND +Vit. C+Vit. E muameleli grup. 28 gün boyunca yapılan uygulamadan sonra BND muameleli grup kontrol grup ile karşılaştırıldığında ratların testis dokularında MDA miktarında artış gözlenirken, antioksidan enzim aktivitelerinde [süperoksit dismutaz (SOD), katalaz (CAT), glutatyon-S-transferaz (GST), glutatyon peroksidaz (GPx)] istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir azalma gözlenmiştir. BND +Vit. C, BND +Vit. E ve BND +Vit. C+E muameleli gruplar BND muameleli grupla karşılaştırıldığında ratların testis dokularında MDA miktarında azalma gözlenirken, SOD, CAT, GST ve GPx enzim aktivitelerinde istatiksel olarak anlamlı bir artış gözlenmiştir. Histopatolojik incemelerde ise ratların testis dokusunda BND’ın sebep olduğu patolojik değişiklikleri vitamin C ve E’nin azalttığı tespit edilmiştir.
Article
Full-text available
Article
Full-text available
National governments introduced residue limits and guideline levels for pesticide residues in water when policies were implemented to minimize the contamination of ground and surface waters. Initially, the main attention was given to drinking water. Regulatory limits for pesticide residues in waters should have the following characteristics: definition of the type of water, definition of the residue, a suitable analytical method for the residues, and explanation for the basis for each limit. Limits may be derived by applying a safety factor to a no-effect-level, or from levels occurring when good practices are followed and also passing a safety assessment, or from the detection limit of an analytical method, or directly by legislative decision. The basis for limits and guideline values issued by WHO, Australia, the United States, New Zealand, Japan, Canada, European Union, and Taiwan is described, and examples of the limits are provided. Limits have been most commonly developed for drinking water, but values have also been proposed for environmental waters, effluent waters, irrigation waters, and livestock drinking waters. The contamination of ground water is of concern because it may be used as drinking water and act as a source of contamination for surface waters. Most commonly, drinking water standards have been applied to ground water. The same terminology may have different meanings in different systems. For example, guideline value (GV) in WHO means a value calculated from a toxicology parameter, whereas in Australia, a GV is at or about the analytical limit of determination or a maximum level that might occur if good practices are followed. In New Zealand, the GV is the concentration where aesthetic significance is influenced.The Australian health value (HV) is conceptually the same as the WHO GV. The New Zealand maximum acceptable value (MAV) and the Canadian maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) are also conceptually the same as the WHO GV. Each of the possible ways of defining the residues has its merits. A residue limit in water expressed as the sum of parent and toxicologically relevant transformation products makes sense where it is derived from the acceptable daily intake (ADI). For monitoring purposes, where it is best to keep the residue definition as simple as possible for the sake of practical enforcement and economy, theparent or a marker residue is preferable. It is also possible for parent and degradation products (hydrolysis and photolysis products and metabolites) to become physically separated as the water moves through soil strata, which suggests that separate limits should be set for parent and important degradation products. The Commission has made 12 recommendations for regulatory limits for pesticide residues in water. The recommendations will act as a checklist for authorities introducing or revising limits or guidelines for pesticide residues in water.
Article
Full-text available
Here we report a preliminary working scheme for the integrative application of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metallomic methodologies in environmental monitoring, by using as sentinel the wildlife species Mus spretus and as reference the gene/protein sequence databases from the key model species Mus musculus. We have demonstrated that the absolute transcript expression signatures quantified by reverse transcription (RT) and real-time poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) of selected key genes (e.g., those coding for biotransformation enzymes) in M. spretus is a useful and reliable novel biomonitoring end-point. The suitabil-ity of commercial M. musculus oligonucleotide arrays for genome-wide transcriptional pro-filing in M. spretus has been also shown. Transcriptomic studies indicate considerable gene sequence similarities between both mouse species. Based on these similarities, we have demonstrated the applicability in free-living M. spretus of high-throughput proteomic meth-ods, based on matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization with time-of-flight mass spectrom-etry (MALDI-TOFMS) analysis of tryptic 2D electrophoresis (2-DE) spot digest and peptide matching with M. musculus database. A metallomic approach based on size exclusion chromatography inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (SEC-ICP-MS) was applied to trace metal-biomolecule profiles. A preliminary integration of these three -omics has been addressed to M. musculus/M. spretus couple, two rodent species that separated 3 million years ago. The integrated application of transcriptomic and proteomic data and the bidirec-tional use of metallomics and proteomics for selective isolation of metal-biomolecules are covered in the working scheme MEPROTRANS-triple-OMIC reported in this study.
Article
Guidelines for submitting commentsPolicy: Comments that contribute to the discussion of the article will be posted within approximately three business days. We do not accept anonymous comments. Please include your email address; the address will not be displayed in the posted comment. Cell Press Editors will screen the comments to ensure that they are relevant and appropriate but comments will not be edited. The ultimate decision on publication of an online comment is at the Editors' discretion. Formatting: Please include a title for the comment and your affiliation. Note that symbols (e.g. Greek letters) may not transmit properly in this form due to potential software compatibility issues. Please spell out the words in place of the symbols (e.g. replace “α” with “alpha”). Comments should be no more than 8,000 characters (including spaces ) in length. References may be included when necessary but should be kept to a minimum. Be careful if copying and pasting from a Word document. Smart quotes can cause problems in the form. If you experience difficulties, please convert to a plain text file and then copy and paste into the form.
Article
The determination of pesticide residues in food matrices is a formidable challenge mainly because of the small quantities of analytes and large amounts of interfering substances which can be co-extracted with analytes and, in most cases, adversely affect the results of an analysis. However, safety concerns require that pesticides of the wide range of chemical properties (including acidic, basic and neutral) should be monitored. Because of the wide variety of food matrices, the sample must initially be cleaned up before final analysis. That is why the analytical chemist is faced with the need to devise new methodologies for determining such residues to be determined in a single analytical run. To accomplish the goal, QuEChERS methodology has been developed. It is a streamlined and effective extraction and cleanup approach for the analysis of diverse analyte residues in food matrices. So far, there have been achieved promising results by liquid or gas chromatography analysis, including pesticides, but also acrylamide, pharmaceuticals and veterinary drugs.
Article
An analytical method, based on microwave-assisted extraction and liquid chromatography with diode array detection, for the determination of six carbamate and three urea pesticides in fresh and processed tomato samples is described. Significant parameters affecting extraction efficiency were optimized. Under optimum microwave-assisted extraction conditions (20 mL acetonitrile, for 10 minutes, at 60°C), pesticides were extracted with recoveries ranging from 57.6 to 102% (RSDs Keywords: Carbamates; Pesticides; liquid chromatography; microwave-assisted extraction; tomato; ureas Document Type: Research Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00032710802585717 Affiliations: 1: REQUIMTE, Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto, Rua Dr. Antonio Bernardino de Almeida, Porto, Portugal 2: LEPÆ-Laboratory of Process, Environment and Energy Engineering/Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto, Portugal Publication date: January 1, 2009 $(document).ready(function() { var shortdescription = $(".originaldescription").text().replace(/\\&/g, '&').replace(/\\, '<').replace(/\\>/g, '>').replace(/\\t/g, ' ').replace(/\\n/g, ''); if (shortdescription.length > 350){ shortdescription = "" + shortdescription.substring(0,250) + "... more"; } $(".descriptionitem").prepend(shortdescription); $(".shortdescription a").click(function() { $(".shortdescription").hide(); $(".originaldescription").slideDown(); return false; }); }); Related content In this: publication By this: publisher By this author: Paiga, Paula ; Morais, Simone ; Correia, Manuela ; Alves, Arminda ; Delerue-Matos, Cristina GA_googleFillSlot("Horizontal_banner_bottom");
Article
An analytical multiresidue method for the simultaneous determination of seven pesticides in fresh vegetable samples, namely, courgette (Cucurbita pepo), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), lettuce (Lactuca sativa, Romaine and Iceberg varieties) and peppers (Capsicum sp.) is described. The procedure, based on microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and analysis by liquid chromatography– photodiode array (LC–PDA) detection was applied to four carbamates (carbofuran, carbaryl, chlorpropham and EPTC) and three urea pesticides (monolinuron, metobromuron and linuron). Extraction solvent and the addition of anhydrous sodium sulphate to fresh vegetable homogenate before MAE were the parameters optimised for each commodity. Recovery studies were performed using spiked samples in the range 250–403 mg kg À1 in each pesticide. The pesticide residues were extracted using 20 mL acetonitrile at 60 C, for 10 min. Acceptable recoveries and RSDs were attained (overall average recovery of 77.2% and RSDs are lower than 11%). Detection limits ranged between 5.8 mg kg À1 for carbaryl to 12.3 mg kg À1 for carbofuran. The analytical protocol was applied for quality control of 41 fresh vegetable samples bought in Oporto Metropolitan Area (North Portugal). None of the samples contained any detectable amounts of the studied compounds.
Article
This work reports the utilization of two methodologies for carbaryl determination in tomatoes. The measurements were carried out using an amperometric biosensor technique based on the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity due to carbaryl adsorption and a HPLC procedure. The electrochemical experiments were performed in 0.1 mol L−1 phosphate buffer solutions at pH 7.4 with an incubation time of 8 min. The analytical curve obtained in pure solutions showed excellent linearity in the 5.0 × 10−5 to 75 × 10−5 mol L−1 range, with the limit of detection at 0.4 × 10−3 g L−1. The application of such a methodology in tomato samples involved solely liquidising the samples, which were spiked with 6.0 × 10−6 and 5.0 × 10−5 mol L−1 carbaryl. Recovery in such samples presented values of 99.0 and 92.4%, respectively. In order to obtain a comparison, HPLC experiments were also conducted under similar conditions. However, the tomato samples have to be manipulated by an extraction procedure (MSPD), which yielded much lower recovery values (78.3 and 84.8%, respectively). On the other hand, the detection limit obtained was much lower than that for the biosensor, i.e., 3.2 × 10−6 g L−1. Finally, the biosensor methodology was employed to analyze carbaryl directly inside the tomato, without any previous manipulation. In this case, the biosensor was immersed in the tomato pulp, which had previously been spiked with the pesticide for 8 min, removed and inserted in the electrochemical cell. A recovery of 83.4% was obtained, showing very low interference of the matrix constituents.