Content uploaded by Chicgoua Noubactep
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Chicgoua Noubactep on Dec 06, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
On the Operating Mode of Bimetallic Systems for Environmental 1
Remediation 2
Noubactep C. 3
Angewandte Geologie, Universität Göttingen, Goldschmidtstraße 3, D - 37077 Göttingen, Germany. 4
e-mail: cnoubac@gwdg.de; Tel. +49 551 39 3191, Fax: +49 551 399379 5
6
Abstract 7
This letter challenges the concept that Fe0/Me0 bimetallic systems enhance contaminant 8
reduction on Me0 surfaces. It is shown on a pure thermodynamic perspective that any 9
enhancement of contaminant reduction by Fe0 in the presence of a second more 10
electropositive elemental metal (Me0) is the result of an indirect process resulting from iron 11
corrosion. This demonstration validates the concept that aqueous contaminant removal in the 12
presence of Fe0 mostly occurs within an in-situ generated oxide film on Fe0. 13
14
Keywords: Adsorption; Bimetallic system; Co-precipitation, Zerovalent iron; Reduction. 15
16
A metallic surface can be involved in chemical reactions in various ways: a metallic material 17
can serve as a redox agent or catalyst, facilitating a reaction, or it can release metal species 18
into the system [1,2]. Elemental iron (Fe0) and Fe0/Me0 bimetallic systems used in water 19
remediation (Fe0-H2O systems) are typical systems were all these three reaction paths might 20
be involved: (i) Fe0 might serve as reducing agent (direct reduction), (ii) Fe0 surface might 21
serve a catalyst for instance for the reduction through molecular (H2) or atomic hydrogen (H) 22
and (iii) Fe0 might release FeII and H/H2 into the system. A Fe0/Me0 system is a system where 23
the metallic surface should serve as a catalyst for contaminant reduction through hydrogen 24
(H/H2). 25
A survey of the voluminous literature on environmental remediation with Fe0 shows that all 26
factors increasing Fe0 oxidation enhance contaminant removal. These factors include (i) the 27
presence of molecular oxygen [3], (ii) the addition of a second more electropositive metal 28
(e.g. Ag0, Co0, Cu0, Ni0, Pd0, Pt0, Ru0) yielding bimetallic systems [4,5], and (iii) increasing 29
the surface area of iron by reducing its particle size [4]. Increasing Fe0 oxidation is directly 30
correlated with increased generation of iron corrosion products (e.g. iron oxyhydroxides) 31
which are well-known for their adsorptive capacity for both organic and inorganic compounds 32
[6]. Iron corrosion products are formed as an oxide film at the Fe0 surface. To reach the 33
underlying Fe0 surface a contaminant molecule should migrate across the film. 34
In discussing aqueous contaminant removal in the presence of Fe0, reduction at the Fe0 35
surface and adsorption onto iron corrosion products have traditionally been evaluated as 36
separate, independent processes that occur simultaneously or sequentially. Thereby the 37
dynamic nature of the formation of the oxide film on Fe0 [8] has been almost overseen. 38
However, during their formation and transformation iron corrosion products likely sequestrate 39
foreign species, including contaminants [9]. Therefore, the author of ref. [9] has revisited the 40
concept of reductive transformations [3,10] and introduced a new concept considering 41
adsorption and co-precipitation of contaminants with iron corrosion products as primordial 42
removal mechanism. The present letter shows that the conception that bimetallic systems 43
enhance reductive transformation by Fe0 is incompatible with the premise that Fe0 is the 44
reducing agent in Fe0-H2O systems (statement 1). It has been reported that the presence of 45
Pd0 speeds up the reduction reaction as follows: on the Pd0 surface, molecular hydrogen (H2) 46
from iron corrosion is adsorbed and dissociated into more reducing atomic H; atomic H 47
attacks chlorinated contaminants (R-X) and transforms them to R-H and Cl- [11]. Therefore, 48
the better well-dispersed the Pd0 in the Fe0/Pd0 system, the higher the catalytic effect. But, as 49
recalled above, an universal oxide film shields the bimetallic surface [9,12]. Catalytic 50
hydrodehalogenation is a well-known decontamination process [13]; it differs from the 51
reductive dehalogenation reactions by Fe0 and Fe0/Pd0 systems in that the catalytic surface 52
(Pd0) and the electron donor (H2) are supplied as two separate reagents. 53
To demonstrate the absurdity of statement 1, lets consider the bimetallic system Fe0/Pd0 and 54
a chlorinated hydrocarbon (RCl) to be reduced by the bimetallic. The involved electrode 55
potentials (E0) are: 0.915 V for the couple PdII/Pd0, 0.41 to 0.59 V for the couple RCl/R° [14], 56
and –0.44 V for the couple FeII/Fe0. The higher the E0 value, the stronger the reducing 57
capacity of Fe0 for the oxidant of a couple. Comparing the three E0 values, it is evident that 58
PdII and RCl are concurrent oxidants for Fe0, PdII been the strongest. Therefore, if any RCl 59
removal enhancement is observed in the presence of PdII it is indirectly related to Fe0 60
oxidation. Thus enhanced contaminant reduction by bimetallics [4,5,15] is an argument for 61
indirect reduction (by FeII or H/H2 within the oxide film on Fe0) [12]. Because of the 62
omnipresence of the oxide film, even if the reducing agent is H/H2, the reduction is not likely 63
to occur at the Pd0 surface. On the other hand FeII adsorbed onto the oxide film (FeII(s) or 64
structural FeII) has been shown to be a very strong reducing agent [16]. 65
For illustration, consider an ideal redox indicator for the titration of Fe0 by PdII (Eq. 1) having 66
a standard potential of 0.238 V. The redox half-reaction of the indicator is described by 67
equation 2 [17], where Indox
is the coloured oxidized form of the indicator, Indred is the 68
corresponding colourless reduced form, n is the number of electrons transferred (typically 1 or 69
2), and m is the number of protons transferred (typically 0, 1 or 2) and is dependent on the 70
pH. 71
Fe0 + Pd2+ ⇔ Fe2+ + Pd0 (1) 72
Indox
+ ne- + m H+ ⇔ Indred (2) 73
Indred + Pd2+ ⇔ Indox
+ Pd0 (3) 74
The end of the titration (Fe0 depletion) is detected by the appearance of a colour in the 75
solution. This colouration of the solution corresponds to the oxidation of the reduced form of 76
the indicator to the oxidized form (Eq. 3) by Pd2+ ions. To obtain accurate results, the lowest 77
possible amount of indicator should be used. In the titration context, no one can claim that 78
PdII enhances the reduction of Indox
by Fe0. PdII oxidizes both Indox
and Fe0. In this 79
competition Fe0 is the stronger electron donor. Therefore, if any Indox
reduction enhancement 80
is observed in the presence of PdII, it can only indirectly be related to Fe0 oxidation. It is true 81
that the surface of Pd0 and not dissolved PdII is the catalyst for contaminant reduction by 82
H/H2. The Pd0 surface is however, shielded as a rule, and dissolved PdII will (at least partly) 83
co-precipitate with iron hydroxides and will no more be available for catalytic activity. 84
In conclusion, Pd0 and other bimetallic elements (Co0, Cu0, Ni0, Pt, Ru0…) can not 85
significantly enhance contaminant reduction by elemental iron (electron from Fe0 or from 86
H/H2). Consequently, the reported increased contaminant removal by bimetallic systems is a 87
result of secondary redox processes within the oxide film on Fe0 (electron from FeII or from 88
H/H2). This conclusion is a further negation of the well-established concept of direct reductive 89
transformations as major decontamination process [9, 12]. 90
For the further development of the iron reactive wall technology target experiments should be 91
performed to investigate the influence of hydrodynamic shear stress on the transport, transfer 92
and reaction rates within the oxide film, as well as film detachment under experimental 93
conditions pertinent to natural situations. This means that experiments must be performed 94
under conditions which favour oxide film formation and transformation. Redox processes 95
within a film on iron is well documented in the context of microbiologically influenced 96
corrosion [18]. 97
Acknowledgments 98
Thoughtful comments provided by Angelika Schöner (Martin-Luther-University of Halle, 99
Germany) on the draft manuscript are gratefully acknowledged. 100
References 101
[1] M. Haukka, M. Jakonen, T. Nivajärvi, M. Kallinen, The subtle effects of iron-containing 102
metal surfaces on the reductive carbonylation of RuCl3. Dalton Trans. 26 (2006), 3212–3220. 103
[2] A.N. Nesmeyanov, R.Kh. Freidlina, E.C. Chukovskaya, R.G. Petrova, A.B. Belyavsky, 104
Addition, substitution, and telomerization reactions of olefins in the presence of metal 105
carbonyls or colloidal iron. Tetrahedron 17 (1962), 61–68. 106
[3] L.J. Matheson, P.G. Tratnyek, Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated methanes by iron 107
metal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28 (1994), 2045–2053. 108
[4] C.J. Lin, S.L. Lo, Y.H. Liou, Dechlorination of trichloroethylene in aqueous solution by 109
noble metal-modified iron. J. Hazard. Mater. 116 (2004), 219–228. 110
[5] R. Muftikian, Q. Fernando, N. Korte, A method for the rapid dechlorination of low 111
molecular weight chlorinated hydrocarbons in water. Water Res. 29 (1995), 2434–2439. 112
[6] G.E. Brown Jr., V.E. Henrich, W.H. Casey, D.L. Clark, C. Eggleston, A. Felmy, D.W. 113
Goodman, M. Grätzel, G. Maciel, M.I. McCarthy, K.H. Nealson, D.A. Sverjensky, M.F. 114
Toney, J.M. Zachara, Metal oxide surfaces and their interactions with aqueous solutions and 115
microbial organisms. Chem. Rev. 99 (1999), 77–174. 116
[7] S. Rakshit, C.J. Matocha, G.R. Haszler, Nitrate reduction in the presence of wüstite. J. 117
Environ. Qual. 34 (2005), 1286–1292. 118
[8] P. Schmuki, From Bacon to barriers: a review on the passivity of metals and alloys. J. 119
Solid State Electrochem. 6 (2002), 145–164. 120
[9] C. Noubactep, Processes of contaminant removal in “Fe0-H2O” systems revisited. The 121
importance of co-precipitation. Open Environ. J. 1 (2007), 9–13. 122
[10] E.J. Weber, Iron-mediated reductive transformations: investigation of reaction 123
mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 (1996), 716–719. 124
[11] Y. Liu, F.L. Yang, P.L. Yue, G. Chen, Dechlorination of Chlorophenols by 125
Palladium/Iron. Water Res. 35 (2001), 1887–1890. 126
[12] C. Noubactep, A critical review on the mechanism of contaminant removal in Fe0-H2O 127
systems. Environ. Technol. 29 (2008), 909–920. 128
[13] C.G. Schreier, M. Reinhard, Catalytic hydrodehalogenation of chlorinated ethylenes 129
using palladium and hydrogen for the treatment of contaminated water. Chemosphere 31 130
(1995), 3475–3487. 131
[14] A.L. Roberts, L.A. Totten, W.A. Arnold, D.R. Burris, T.J. Campbell, Reductive 132
elimination of chlorinated ethylenes by zero-valent metals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 (1996), 133
2654–2659. 134
[15] D.M. Cwiertny, S.T. Bransfield, A.L. Roberts, Influence of oxidizing species on the 135
reactivity of iron-based bimetallic reductants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (2007), 3734–3740. 136
[16] A.F. White, M.L. Peterson, Reduction of aqueous transition metal species on the surfaces 137
of Fe(II)-containing oxides. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60 (1996), 3799–3814. 138
[17] B.D. Jones, J.D. Ingle, Evaluation of redox indicators for determining sulfate-reducing 139
and dechlorinating conditions. Water Res. 39 (2005), 4343–4354. 140
[18] B. Little, P. Wagner, F. Mansfeld, An overview of microbiologically influenced 141
corrosion. Electrochim. Acta 37 (1992), 2185–2194. 142