ArticlePublisher preview available

Relationship Between Linguistic Antonyms in Momentary and Retrospective Ratings of Happiness and Sadness

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Momentary ratings of affective states with a pair of strict antonyms (“happy” vs. “sad”) were studied with an experience-sampling method in a group of 110 participants during 14 consecutive days at 7 randomly determined occasions per day. Before and after the experimental session participants also retrospectively rated how happy or sad they had been during the previous 2 weeks. Multilevel analysis showed that, at the level of single measurement trials, the momentary ratings of happiness and sadness were moderately negatively correlated (r = –.32, p < .001). A between-subject correlation of the two antonyms, however, was in a positive direction (r = .13, p = .123). Participants experienced mixed feelings during a considerable number of measurement trials, whereas the tendency to feel mixed emotions was predicted by all Big Five personality traits except Agreeableness. A configural frequency analysis (CFA) demonstrated that, although there was no strict bipolarity between momentary ratings of happiness and sadness, they were nevertheless used in an exclusive manner in many occasions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
L.Köötset al.: Happiness and SadnessJournal of IndividualDifferences2012; Vol. 33(1):43–53© 2012HogrefePublishing
Original Article
Relationship Between Linguistic
Antonyms in Momentary
and Retrospective Ratings
of Happiness and Sadness
Liisi Kööts, Anu Realo, and Jüri Allik
University of Tartu, Department of Psychology, Tartu, Estonia
Abstract. Momentary ratings of affective states with a pair of strict antonyms (“happy” vs. “sad”) were studied with an experience-
sampling method in a group of 110 participants during 14 consecutive days at 7 randomly determined occasions per day. Before and
after the experimental session participants also retrospectively rated how happy or sad they had been during the previous 2 weeks.
Multilevel analysis showed that, at the level of single measurement trials, the momentary ratings of happiness and sadness were
moderately negatively correlated (r= –.32, p< .001). A between-subject correlation of the two antonyms, however, was in a positive
direction (r= .13, p= .123). Participants experienced mixed feelings during a considerable number of measurement trials, whereas the
tendency to feel mixed emotions was predicted by all Big Five personality traits except Agreeableness. A configural frequency analysis
(CFA) demonstrated that, although there was no strict bipolarity between momentary ratings of happiness and sadness, they were
nevertheless used in an exclusive manner in many occasions.
Keywords: happiness, sadness, mixed emotions, personality
Native speakers have strong intuitions about which pairs of
words are good examples of antonyms. Probably all Eng-
lish speakers would agree, for example, that happy is the
opposite of sad, very much like cold is the opposite of hot
(Cruse, 1986). Accordingly, “when you are happy, you are
not sad and when you are sad, you are not happy” (Russell
& Carroll, 1999, p. 25). It was therefore a surprising dis-
covery that individuals tend to characterize their momen-
tary or recent affective experience in two relatively inde-
pendent ways: A person’s degree of happiness does not pre-
dict their degree of sadness, even if both judgments are
made practically at the same time (Diener & Emmons,
1985; Watson & Tellegen, 1985). Very often, retrospective
or momentary measures of affect demonstrate only a weak
negative correlation between positive and negative emo-
tions (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988). In Estonian, for
example, linguistic antonyms such as happy (rõõmus) and
sad (kurb) are not true opposites when they are used retro-
spectively to rate recent emotional experience (Allik &
Realo, 1997). This means that people report positive and
negative feelings at the same time, and that these two af-
fective states are not polar opposites. Although paradoxi-
cal, the separability of positive and negative affect has ac-
quired remarkable popularity among researchers. For ex-
ample, a short measure of positive and negative affect
PANAS (Watson et al., 1988) – has been cited 5,819 times
(Web of Science, May 9, 2011) since its publication 23
years ago.
As expected, such an idea, contradicting as it does lin-
guistic intuition, did not take long to bring about heated
discussion. Green, Goldman, and Salovey (1993) chal-
lenged the idea, claiming that a nonrandom measurement
error can mask bipolarity. They argued that, after adjusting
for random and systematic error in positive and negative
affect, a correlation between the two affects that may be
close to 0 becomes closer to –1, indicating that the relation-
ship between the two variables is mutually exclusive. Al-
though systematic error can attenuate the observed corre-
lation between positive and negative affect, it still does not
explain why measures of positive and negative emotions
behave in many situations as if they were relatively inde-
pendent (Rafaeli & Revelle, 2006; Schimmack, 2001; Tel-
legen, Watson, & Clark, 1999).
Another challenge to the separability of positive and
negative emotions comes from Russell (2003), who char-
acterizes a prototypical emotional episode by two basic di-
mensions: feeling good or bad and energized or lethargic.
These states called core affect – are supposed to have an
DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000061
© 2012 Hogrefe Publishing Journal of Individual Differences 2012; Vol. 33(1):43–53
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... However, studies that have constrained the definition of mixed emotions to include only specific pairs of emotions (e.g. happiness and sadness; Kööts, Realo, & Allik, 2012) or co-occurrences of PA and NA only at moderate-to-high intensities (e.g. Riediger, Schmiedek, Wagner, & Lindenberger, 2009;Riediger, Wrzus, & Wagner, 2014;Schneider & Stone, 2015;Watson & Stanton, 2017) have yielded lower prevalence rates of around 5-15%. ...
... Consider the minimum statistic (MIN), which has been argued to best capture co-occurrences of PA and NA (Larsen et al., 2017;Schimmack, 2001). MIN and binary indices utilising a MIN based cut-off have been used in several daily life studies of mixed emotions (Kööts et al., 2012;Riediger et al., 2009;Riediger et al., 2014;Schneider & Stone, 2015;Scott et al., 2014;Trampe et al., 2015;Watson & Stanton, 2017). This measure is calculated as the intensity value of the lesser of the two co-occurring emotions (e.g. if PA is rated as 5 out of 10 and NA is rated as 3 out of 10, then MIN is also 3). ...
... Verduyn & Brans, 2012;Watson & Tellegen, 1985). Further, Neuroticism has already been associated with more frequent mixed happy and sad emotional experiences in daily life (Kööts et al., 2012) as well as with higher scores on a dispositional measure of the tendency to experience mixed emotions (Barford & Smillie, 2016). In this latter study, we found that the association between Neuroticism and trait mixed emotions was explained by trait negative affectivity-that is, the tendency to experience more frequent NA. ...
Article
In this study, we examine how daily life fluctuations in positive affect (PA) and negative afect (NA) relate to mixed emotions—that is, simultaneous positive and negative feelings. We utilised three experience sampling studies (total N = 275), in which participants reported their affect 10 times each day for up to 14 days. Because people generally experience fairly stable moderate levels of PA in daily life, we proposed that mixed emotions would typically occur when NA increases and overlaps with, but does not entirely eliminate, PA. Accordingly, within individuals, we found that mixed emotions in daily life were more strongly predicted by changes in NA and the occurrence of negative events than by changes in PA and positive events. At the between‐person level, individuals with more variable NA, more stable PA, and higher trait Neuroticism scores experienced higher average levels of mixed emotions. Further, we found evidence that the average magnitude of NA increases may partially mediate the association between Neuroticism and mixed emotions. We also found that positive predictors of mixed emotions are negative predictors of individuals' within‐person PA/NA correlations—that is, affective synchrony. Our findings elucidate trait predictors and affective dynamics of daily life mixed emotions, which appear closely intertwined with NA variability. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology
... Two recent studies have related individual differences in the experience of mixed emotions to the 'Big Five' trait domains of personality (see John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008), which each hierarchically subsume two narrower trait aspects, as well as six or more trait facets (see DeYoung et al., 2007). In the first study, Kööts, Realo, & Allik (2012) sampled participants' daily-life affective experiences multiple times over a two week period. They found that the Extraversion, Openness/Intellect, and Neuroticism domains were associated with greater incidence of mixed emotions, while Conscientiousness predicted fewer mixed emotional experiences. ...
... First, Pleasing- Upsetting appraisal scores indicated the overlap between ratings of pleasing and upsetting, which were the clearest pair of antonyms among the available valenced appraisals. This was of interest because some approaches to the measurement of mixed experiences have placed importance on the use of ratings that are clear semantic opposites (e.g., Kööts et al., 2012;Russell & Carroll, 1999). Second, the overlap between beautiful and disgusting appraisals was computed. ...
... The observed positive relations between mixed appraisals and Openness/Intellect are consistent with our reasoning that individuals who tend to feel more mixed emotions (Barford & Smillie, 2016;Kööts et al., 2012) will also tend to make more mixed appraisals. This prediction drew on Shuman et al.'s (2013) theory that mixed emotions arise from conflict among micro-valences that arise during the process of evaluating a stimulus. ...
Article
Openness/Intellect, a trait domain reflecting a tendency towards cognitive exploration, is positively associated with the tendency to experience mixed emotions (i.e., simultaneous positive and negative feelings). This study examined whether this trait is also positively associated with mixed appraisals (i.e., concurrent positive and negative stimulus evaluations). Participants (N = 225) appraised 18 visual artworks. Higher Openness/Intellect predicted stronger mixed appraisals, particularly of the artworks rated as more mixed on average. Openness/Intellect also predicted stronger within-person positive relations between artwork viewing time and mixed appraisals, though this finding was less consistent across measures. It also appeared that Neuroticism might predict a lesser tendency to make mixed appraisals. This study provides a foundation for future research examining individual differences in mixed appraisals.
... Several studies reported that individuals experience mixed emotions in 30 to 50% of occurrences (Scott et al., 2014;Trampe et al., 2015), suggesting a very high prevalence of mixed emotions in everyday life. When considering only specific pairs of emotions such as happy and sad, and occurrences of moderate-to-high emotions, studies found a lower rate of about 5-15% (Kööts et al., 2012;Riediger et al., 2009Riediger et al., , 2014Schneider & Stone, 2015;Watson & Stanton, 2017). Beyond the bare level of co-occurrence, some combinations are more likely than others. ...
... This finding further supports the bivariate hypothesis of emotions (Cacioppo & Berntson, 1994;Larsen & McGraw, 2014;Watson et al., 1999). Third, our results contrast with previous research that showed how relatively infrequent were instances of mixed emotions in daily life (Kööts et al., 2012;Riediger et al., 2009Riediger et al., , 2014Schneider & Stone, 2015;Watson & Stanton, 2017). Our findings showed that a large proportion of individuals experienced mixed future-oriented emotions. ...
Thesis
Full-text available
Most future educational and career transitions represent major life events that individuals anticipate to a considerable extent, possibly with multiple emotions at the same time. However, few studies have examined the emotions that individuals experience when they anticipate a future educational or career transition, imagine how it will occur, the consequences it will have for them, and visualize their coping efforts. The aims of the present dissertation are fourfold. First, we explore individuals’ combinations of multiple future-oriented emotions at the prospect of three major educational and career transitions: (a) the transition from high school to higher education, (b) the transition from higher education to the job market, and (c) the transition from unemployment to employment. Due to the rather exploratory nature of our first research question, our second objective pertains to the replication of these combinations and the investigation of similarities between several groups of individuals based on (a) gender, (b) institutional context, and (c) the temporal distance before the transition. Third, we examine several antecedents of individuals’ combinations of future-oriented emotions. These antecedents ranged from career-related constructs such as career decidedness and career adaptability to affective mechanisms such as cognitive appraisals, trait affect, and emotion regulation. Finally, we examine the behavioral effects of future-oriented emotions in terms of anticipated vocational planning and effort. Overall, the present dissertation brings several implications in highlighting the combinations of future-oriented emotions that individuals experience when anticipating important vocational transitions, a research strand that is scarce both in vocational and emotion research. From a practical point of view, the evidence of several combinations—and the differences and similarities among several groups or contexts—carries practical implications for designing and implementing career-related interventions. Finally, examining antecedents and outcomes of future-oriented emotions combinations underlines the importance of taking emotional anticipation processes into account when individuals prepare for and cope with major educational and career transitions.
... Negative events elicited more mixed emotions than positive events overall, but trait dialectical thinking (i.e., the tendency to balance evaluations and tolerate contradictions) positively predicted mixed emotional responses to positive events. A more recent study (Koots, Realo, & Allik, 2012) explored relations between mixed emotions and the five basic personality domains (the Big Five, see John, Naumann, & Soto, 2008). Extraversion (i.e., sociability and boldness) and Openness/ Intellect (i.e., curiosity and imagination) positively predicted simultaneous positive and negative emotion states in daily-life samples, whereas Conscientiousness (i.e., orderliness and reliability) was a negative predictor. ...
... The sparse individual differences research on mixed emotions is difficult to synthesise, given the focus on somewhat idiosyncratic traits (e.g., dialectical thinking, construal level, etc.), and inconsistent mixed emotions measures (e.g., affective synchrony, etc.). Like Koots et al. (2012), we employed the Big Five personality taxonomy: a comprehensive yet parsimonious organising framework for personality traits (John et al., 2008). Because these broad domains hierarchically subsume narrower personality traits (DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007), understanding their relations with trait mixed emotions may help synthesise research associating mixed emotions with narrower traits. ...
Article
Despite accumulating evidence for concurrent feelings of positivity and negativity (e.g., simultaneous happiness and sadness), little is known about individual differences in these mixed emotions experiences. We examined relations between a novel measure of dispositional mixed emotions (the Trait Mixed Emotions Scale; TMES) and the Big Five trait domains and aspects. We derived two a-priori predictions: (1) Openness/Intellect—reflecting cognitive flexibility and exploration—would predict the TMES, and (2) Extraversion and Neuroticism—reflecting susceptibility to positive and negative emotions, respectively—would jointly predict the TMES. Results showed that two measures of the Openness aspect of Openness/Intellect positively predicted TMES scores. Extraversion and Neuroticism did not jointly predict the TMES. Neuroticism positively predicted the TMES, but this reflected the relation of Neuroticism with dispositional negative emotions. The Volatility aspect of Neuroticism, however, was a positive predictor of the TMES beyond its relation with trait negativity. Our findings inform further study of differential mixed emotions experiences, and may help consolidate the previous fragmented literature in this area.
... This study is a part of a broader research project exploring emotion experience in daily life (see also Kööts et al., 2011Kööts et al., , 2012Mill et al., 2016). The sample consisted of 110 participants (70 females and 40 males) with ages ranging from 19 to 84 years. ...
Article
Full-text available
The main aim of the current study was to examine the role of co-occurring emotions and their interactive effects with the Big Five personality traits in anger expression. Everyday anger expression (“anger-in” and “anger-out” behavior) was studied with the experience-sampling method in a group of 110 participants for 14 consecutive days on 7 random occasions per day. Our results showed that the simultaneously co-occurring emotions that buffer against anger expression are sadness, surprise, disgust, disappointment, and irritation for anger-in behavior, and fear, sadness and disappointment for anger-out reactions. While previous studies have shown that differentiating one's current affect into discrete emotion categories buffers against anger expression (Pond et al., 2012), our study further demonstrated the existence of specific interactive effects between the experience of momentary emotions and personality traits that lead to higher levels of either suppression or expression of anger behavior (or both). For example, the interaction between the trait Openness and co-occurring surprise, in predicting anger-in behavior, indicates that less open people hold their anger back more, and more open people use less anger-in behavior. Co-occurring disgust increases anger-out reactions in people low in Conscientiousness, but decreases anger-out reactions in people high in Conscientiousness. People high in Neuroticism are less likely to engage in anger-in behavior when experiencing disgust, surprise, or irritation alongside anger, but show more anger out in the case of co-occurring contempt. The results of the current study help to further clarify the interactions between the basic personality traits and the experience of momentary co-occurring emotions in determining anger behavior.
... This study is a part of a larger research project concerning emotion experience in daily life (see also Kööts, Realo, & Allik, 2011, 2012. The sample of this project consisted of 110 participants (70 women and 40 men) with ages ranging from 19 to 84 years. ...
Article
Full-text available
Intraindividual variability, along with the more frequently studied between-person variability, has been argued to be one of the basic building blocks of emotional experience. The aim of the current study is to examine whether intraindividual variability in affect predicts tiredness in daily life. Intraindividual variability in affect was studied with the experience sampling method in a group of 110 participants (aged between 19 and 84 years) during 14 consecutive days on seven randomly determined occasions per day. The results suggest that affect variability is a stable construct over time and situations. Our findings also demonstrate that intraindividual variability in affect has a unique role in predicting increased levels of tiredness at the momentary level as well at the level of individuals.
... than in an age-and gender-comparable sample of 55 individuals (mean age 68.2 years; SD = 5.5, 76 % women; mean PA score = 24.5, SD = 6.0) who were recruited for an experience sampling study (Kööts et al. 2011(Kööts et al. , 2012 from two day centers in Tartu (Estonia) that provide activities and lunches for older people. The scores of NA at both T1 (M = 18.7, ...
Article
Full-text available
The main aim of the current study is to examine the changes in the components of subjective well-being (SWB) over time in patients with osteoarthritis who have undergone total hip or knee replacement surgery (arthroplasty). We are also interested in determining whether pre-operative ratings of self-reported health (SRH) status, as well as change in health status, can serve as predictors for postoperative levels of SWB. To this end, 50 participants who had been admitted to a hospital for arthroplasty completed the measures twice—first at the clinic one day before the surgery, and then at home approximately 4.5 months after the surgery. Despite the fact that there were substantial improvements in participants’ health and physical functioning after the arthroplasty, there were no changes in their ratings of general SRH, life satisfaction (LS), or negative affect (NA). The only change in SWB scores was in the level of positive affect (PA), which was significantly higher after surgery compared with the pre-operative measurement. LS, NA, and PA scores after arthroplasty were differentially predicted by health ratings, showing that, it is the cognitive-evaluative component of SWB (i.e., LS) that is mostly responsible for the association between general SRH and SWB while affective components (i.e., NA and PA) are primarily related to more specific health indicators. Our findings can assist physicians in their efforts to provide more realistic expectations for their patients undergoing surgery in terms of the physical and psychological outcome.
... This study is a part of a larger research project concerning emotion experience in daily life (see also Kööts et al., 2011Kööts et al., , 2012. The sample of this project consisted of 110 participants (70 women and 40 men), with ages ranging from 19 to 84 years. ...
Article
Full-text available
Remembering the emotions we have experienced in the past is the core of one's unique life-experience. However, there are many factors, both at the state and trait level that can affect the way past feelings are seen. The main aim of the current study was to examine the impact of individual differences on systematic biases in retrospective ratings compared to the momentary experience of basic emotions such as sadness, fear, happiness, and anger. To this end, an experience sampling study across 2 weeks was conducted using a younger and an older age-group; the experience of momentary emotions was assessed on 7 randomly determined occasions per day, the retrospective ratings being collected at the end of each day about that day, as well as at the end of the study about the previous 2 weeks. The results indicated that age and daily tiredness have significant effects on retrospective emotion ratings over a 1-day period (state level), enhancing the retrospective ratings of negative emotions and decreasing the ratings of felt happiness. Whereas personality traits influence the more long-term emotion experience (trait level), with all Big Five personality traits having selective impact on retrospective emotion ratings of fear, sadness, happiness, and anger. Findings provide further evidence about the systematic biases in retrospective emotion ratings, suggesting that, although retrospective ratings are based on momentary experience, daily tiredness and personality traits systematically influence the way in which past feelings are seen.
Article
Mixed emotions are defined as the co-occurrence of positive and negative emotions. In recent years, research has often focused on individual differences in the experience of mixed emotions. In this study, we conducted two studies to develop the Japanese version of the Trait Mixed Emotions Scale (TMES) which can assess the tendency to experience mixed emotions in daily life. Study 1 revealed that the Japanese version of TMES has certain level of internal consistency and that the pattern of correlational relationships of the Japanese version of TMES with explicit variables are consistent with previous studies and theoretical assumptions. Furthermore, Study 1 suggested that the TMES can be interpreted with three subscales. Study 2 revealed that the Japanese version of TMES has acceptable test-retest reliability and that the factor structure of TMES in Study 1 was replicated. Finally, some issues and prospects for future research on mixed emotions were discussed.
Article
Purpose of the study: The current study deals with a close examination of the linguistic and cultural characteristics of proverbs describing family relations in the paradigm of peculiarities of the German linguistic picture of the world. The purpose of this article is to study and analyze German proverbs describing family relations. Methodology: While conducting the present research work such scientific methods were used: the method of theoretical analysis of literature on the topic under consideration, the method of semantic and structural analysis of German proverbs, the method of lexical and semantic group description, the comparative method. In the course of our study, 180 proverbs were analyzed (describing family relations with the following components: Mann, Frau, Mutter, Vater, Kind, Bruder, Schwester, Sohn, Tochter, Verwandte), reflecting, to varying degrees, the specifics of family relationships. Among these proverbs, thematic groups were distinguished. Main Findings: The semantic features of German proverbs about the family have been distinguished. The classification of German proverbs about the family to the semantic groups was done: the role of women in the family, the role of men in the family, the characteristics of the relationship between wife and husband, etc. Applications of this study: The study may be used for close browsing of the current state of investigations in this scientific area as well as for further investigations of linguistic and cultural characteristics of proverbs describing family relations in the German linguistic picture of the world. Novelty/Originality of this study: When considering the connotation of German proverbs about the family, the author discovered the following regularity: most German proverbs about the family have a positive connotation. The author conducts a semantic analysis of proverbs, during which he identifies specific features that characterize family life in Russian linguoculture. Such findings were firstly done in the current survey.
Article
Full-text available
The authors compared the Big 5 factors of personality with the facets or traits of personality that constitute those factors on their ability to predict 40 behavior criteria. Both the broad factors and the narrow facets predicted substantial numbers of criteria, but the latter did noticeably better in that regard, even when the number of facet predictors was limited to the number of factor predictors. Moreover, the criterion variance accounted for by the personality facets often included large portions not predicted by the personality factors. The narrow facets, therefore, were able to substantially increase the maximum prediction achieved by the broad factors. The results of this study are interpreted as supporting a more detailed approach to personality assessment, one that goes beyond the measurement of the Big 5 factors alone.
Article
Full-text available
At the heart of emotion, mood, and any other emotionally charged event are states experienced as simply feeling good or bad, energized or enervated. These states - called core affect - influence reflexes, perception, cognition, and behavior and are influenced by many causes internal and external, but people have no direct access to these causal connections. Core affect can therefore be experienced as free-floating (mood) or can be attributed to some cause (and thereby begin an emotional episode). These basic processes spawn a broad framework that includes perception of the core-affect-altering properties of stimuli, motives, empathy, emotional meta-experience, and affect versus emotion regulation; it accounts for prototypical emotional episodes, such as fear and anger, as core affect attributed to something plus various nonemotional processes.
Article
Full-text available
Evaluative processes refer to the operations by which organisms discriminate threatening from nurturant environments. Low activation of positive and negative evaluative processes by a stimulus reflects neutrality, whereas high activation of such processes reflects maximal conflict. Attitudes, an important class of manifestations of evaluative processes, have traditionally been conceptualized as falling along a bipolar dimension, and the positive and negative evaluative processes underlying attitudes have been conceptualized as being reciprocally activated, making the bipolar rating scale the measure of choice. Research is reviewed suggesting that this bipolar dimension is insufficient to portray comprehensively positive and negative evaluative processes and that the question is not whether such processes are reciprocally activated but under what conditions they are reciprocally, nonreciprocally, or independently activated. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
Article
The authors compared the Big 5 factors of personality with the facets or traits of personality that constitute those factors on their ability to predict 40 behavior criteria. Both the broad factors and the narrow facets predicted substantial numbers of criteria, but the latter did noticeably better in that regard, even when the number of facet predictors was limited to the number of factor predictors. Moreover, the criterion variance accounted for by the personality facets often included large portions not predicted by the personality factors. The narrow facets, therefore, were able to substantially increase the maximum prediction achieved by the broad factors. The results of this study are interpreted as supporting a more detailed approach to personality assessment, one that goes beyond the measurement of the Big 5 factors alone.
Article
In this article we studied relations between self-rated emotional experience and the five-factor model of personality. Replicating previous findings we found that two dominant dimensions of emotional experience, Negative Affect and Positive Affect (that accounted for three to five times more total variance among Estonian emotion-related terms than any other factors) are selectively related to Neuroticism and Extraversion. Data supported the hierarchical taxonomy scheme proposed by Watson and Clark (1992) in which two broad higher order affective states were each composed of several correlated but still clearly distinguishable moods with their specific content. The content of specific emotions mapped systematically onto measures of personality: Affect scales explained 40% to 50% of the total variance of Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Conscientiousness, approximately 20% of the total variance of Agreeableness, and only 13% of Openness to Experience. Besides the replication of the hierarchical bipartite structure of emotion terms itself in a non-Indo-European language, our data demonstrated that the general pattern of associations between affect and personality domains is also generalizable across languages and cultures.