Content uploaded by Gurudatt Thakkar
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Gurudatt Thakkar on Oct 25, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Rare disease
Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of holoprosencephaly
and associated anomalies
Hemang D Chaudhari, Gurudatt Thakkar, Parth Darji, Pratik Khokhani
Department of Radiology, Smt. S.C.L. Municipal General Hospital, Smt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Correspondence to Dr Hemang D Chaudhari, drhdc1@yahoo.com
Summary
Holoprosencephaly is a rare spectrum of cerebral and facial malformations resulting from incomplete division of the embryonic forebrain
(prosencephalon) into distinct lateral cerebral hemisphere. Holoprosencephaly spectrum in the fetus is often associated with other
anomalies, particularly of the face and extremities. Here we present three different cases of patients with holoprosencephaly who failed to
attain routine sonography during 11–20 weeks owing to some unavoidable circumstances. Two of them were diagnosed during the third
trimester and one in the late second trimester. Ultrasound findings of associated anomalies were confirmed after a clinical examination of
the delivered fetuses.
BACKGROUND
Holoprosencephaly is estimated to occur in 1 of 10 000–
20 000 live births. It is divided into alobar, semilobar and
lobar forms, although there are no clear-cut defining fea-
tures. A series of facial anomalies are frequently asso-
ciated, owing to the common origin of the embryonic
forebrain and mid-face from the prechordal mesoderm,
along with some other anomalies. We report the three
selected cases for their rarity and different anomalies
associated with them, in addition to holoprosencephaly.
This case report evaluates the importance of early ultra-
sound in prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly and
associated anomalies in a fetus and the dreaded outcome
if diagnosed late.
CASE PRESENTATION
Case 1
A 27-year-old primigravida with natural conception was
referred in the third trimester for fetal well-being. A previ-
ous ultrasonography was done at 6 weeks for confirm-
ation of pregnancy and showed a single intrauterine
gestational sac with fetal pole with cardiac activity.
Crown rump length was 4.2 mm, consistent with a
6-week 2-day maturity. After that, she came for an ultra-
sonography examination directly in the third trimester.
Case 2
A 36-year-old woman, gravida 5, para 3, abortion 1, live
issues 3, was admitted with labour pains and referred for
sonography for the first time at 35 weeks of gestation for
fetal well-being and advanced maternal age in her fifth
pregnancy. She did not have any previous sonography
available with her. She had three normal children and one
abortion at 9 weeks in her second pregnancy, because of
some unknown cause.
Case 3
A 22-year-old Indian woman, gravida 1 para 0, came for
the first time in the second trimester of her pregnancy for
sonographic confirmation of gestational age.
In all the above-mentioned cases, rest of the medial and
family histories were unremarkable.
Physical examinations and all other laboratory investi-
gations were within normal limits.
INVESTIGATIONS
Case 1
Ultrasonography revealed a single monoventricular cavity
with partial agenesis of the corpus callosum and fused
thalami suggestive of semilobar-type holoprosencephaly.
A mild degree of hypotelorism was noted. In addition, the
Figure 1 Two different sections of fetal skull showing a large monovetricular cavity.
BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6129 1of6
fetus had a cleft lip. The fetal spine did not reveal
any abnormality. Fetal parameters were consistent with a
32–33-week maturity of the fetus (figures 1–4).
Case 2
Ultrasonography revealed a single intrauterine live fetus.
Biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and femur
length were consistent with the clinically estimated gesta-
tional age of 34–35 weeks. Axial sonograms of the fetal
head showed a dilated, large monoventricle with a periph-
eral rim of the cortex and fused thalami. Falx cerebri
was present. The fetal spine showed meningomyelocoele
in the lower lumbar region. Extrarenal pelvis was noted
in the right kidney, an incidental finding. No facial or
extremity anomalies were noted (figures 5–8).
Case 3
Case 3 Sonographic examination of the uterus revealed a
single living fetus. Axial sonograms of the fetal head
showed dilated cerebral ventricles and fused thalami. The
spine showed meningomyelocoele in the lumbar region.
Fetal biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference and
femur length were consistent with the clinically estimated
gestational age of 26–27 weeks. Mild polyhydramnios was
noted (figures 9–11).
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
Case 1
A male child was born by vaginal delivery after induction.
A clinical examination revealed the presence of a cleft lip
and a mild degree of hypotelorism. The neonate also had
limb abnormalities that were not documented on sonog-
raphy because of the abnormal position and slightly less
amount of liquor (9–10 amniotic fluid index). (However,
we had informed the gynaecologist about this possibility.)
The neonate died several hours after birth.
Case 2
A male child was born by vaginal delivery. A clinical exam-
ination revealed the presence of meningomyelocoele in the
lower lumbar region. The neonate was admitted to the
neonatal intensive care unit and died 2 days after birth.
Case 3
Subsequent sonographies at 30 and 34 weeks were done.
The sonogram at 34 weeks confirmed the suspected fetal
Figure 2 Semilobar type of holoprosencephaly showing fused
thalami.
Figure 3 Profile view of face showing cleft lip.
Figure 4 Postnatal image of neonate showing cleft lip and limb abnormalities.
2of6 BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6129
demise. The female child showed meningocoele in the
lumbar region on postnatal examination.
DISCUSSION
Holoprosencephaly arises from disruption of the normal
induction and patterning of the rostral neural tube during
early embryogenesis.
1–6
The primary brain vesicles, the prosencephalon, mesen-
cephalon and rhombencephalon, are formed by the third
embryonic week. Separate lateral telencephalic and
diencephalic structures develop from a single prosencepha-
lic vesicle, normally beginning by the fifth embryonic
week of gestation.
6
Holoprosencephaly results from incomplete cleavage
of the prosencephalon, occurring between the 18th and
the 28th day of gestation and affecting the forebrain
and the face. Deficiencies in embryonic forebrain cleav-
age range from the most severe or alobar forms to the
Figure 7 Meningomyelocoele in the lower lumbar spine.
Figure 6 Fetal skull showing fused thalami and falx crebri.
Figure 5 Axial section of fetal skull showing a large monoventricular cavity and a peripheral thin rim of brain parenchyma.
BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6129 3of6
least severe or lobar forms and middle interhemispheric
variant.
13
Distinctive midline facial malformations occur in most
cases. These malformations are correlated with the degree
of holoprosencephaly and have prognostic importance.
78
This includes:
▸Cyclopia, in which a single, midline, fused eye exists in
a single orbit below a proboscis.
▸Ethmocephaly, in which ocular hypotelorism is present
with an interorbital proboscis.
Figure 8 Axial section of the abdomen showing extrarenal pelvis in the right kidney, an incidental finding.
Figure 9 Semilobar type of holoprosencephaly showing a large monoventricular cavity and fused thalami.
Figure 10 Meningomyelocoele in the lumbar spine.
4of6 BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6129
▸Cebocephaly, in which ocular hypotelorism is present
with a single-nostril nose.
▸Ocular hypotelorism and midline clefting.
▸Ocular hypotelorism and bilateral clefting.
13
Other malformations include arhinencephaly (absent
olfactory bulbs and tracts), absent thalami, hydrocephalus
and neural migration abnormalities. In case 1, ocular
hypotelorism and midline clefting were present.
The frequency of holoprosencephaly is 1 in 10 000–
20 000 live newborn. During the early embryonic period,
the frequency is 1 in 250 but progressively declines
because of high fetal death rates.
4910
Researches into the aetiology of holoprosencephaly
have revealed multiple teratogenic and genetic causes
(chromosomal and single gene). The involvement of mul-
tiple genes has been implicated in ventral forebrain induc-
tion; their products include the Sonic Hedgehog (Shh)
protein and the Hedgehog signal transduction proteins
patched (Ptc),
11
as well as proteins in the Gli family and
cholesterol biosynthesis pathways.
12
Prenatal diagnosis of holoprosencephaly is based on
transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasonography and
MRI to identify most cases of alobar or semilobar
holoprosencephaly.
In our cases, diagnosis was based on transabdominal
ultrasonography and clinical examination.
Treatment in severe forms of holoprosencephaly is
symptomatic and supportive, and requires a multidiscip-
linary management. The outcome of the child depends on
the severity of holoprosencephaly and the associated
medical and neurological complications.
Learning points
▸Holoprosencephaly can be diagnosed even in the first
trimester after 11–12 weeks. So, routine prenatal
ultrasound should be carried out in all patients during
this period.
▸Ultrasound is a good modality for prenatal diagnosis of
holoprosencephaly that is frequently associated with
midline face deformity such as cleft lip and palate, as
mentioned earlier in case 1.
▸In addition to facial anomalies, anomalies of the spine
and extremities are frequently associated with it and
one must look for them, such as meningomyelocoele in
case 2 and case 3 and limb abnormalities in case 1.
▸The radiologist should remain vigilant in suspected
patients who have a history of a child with
holoprosencephaly, or in high-risk patients such as
elderly gravida.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
REFERENCES
1. Cohen HL, Sivit CJ. Holoprosencephaly. In: Cohen HL, Sivit CJ, eds. Fetal and
pediatric ultrasound: a casebook approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001:12–16.
2. Muenke M, Beachy PA. Holoprosencephaly. In: Scriver CR, Sly WS, Childs B,
et al. eds. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. 8th edn.
New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2001:6203–30.
3. Tegay DH, Cohen HL, Rosovsky M. Holoprosencephaly imaging, Medscape
Reference. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/409265-overview, 2008.
4. Muenke M, Beachy P. Genetics of ventral forebrain development and
holoprosencephaly. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2000;10:262–9.
5. Lewis AJ, Simon EM, Barkovich AJ, et al. Middle interhemispheric variant of
holoprosencephaly: a distinct cliniconeuroradiologic subtype. Neurology 2002;
59:1860–5.
6. Jones K. Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformations. 6th edn.
Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2006:701–3.
7. DeMyer W, Zeman W, Palmer CG. The face predicts the brain: diagnostic
significance of median face anomalies for holoprosencephaly(arhinencephaly).
Pediatrics 1964;34:256–63.
8. Plawner LL, Delgado MR, Miller VS, et al. Neuroanatomy of
holoprosencephaly as predictor of function: beyond the face predicting the
brain. Neurology 2002;59:1058–66.
9. Leoncini E, Baranello G, Orioli IM, et al. Frequency of holoprosencephaly in the
International Clearinghouse Birth Defects Surveillance Systems: searching for
population variations. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2008;82:585–91.
10. Dubourg C, Bendavid C, Pasquier L, et al. Holoprosencephaly. Orphanet J
Rare Dis 2007;2:8.
11. Nanni L, Ming JE, Bocian M, et al. The mutational spectrum of the Sonic
Hedgehog gene in holoprosencephaly: SHH mutations cause a significant
proportion of autosomal dominant holoprosencephaly. Hum Mol Genet
1999;8:2479–88.
12. Roessler E, Du YZ, Mullor JL, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the human
GLI2 gene are associated with pituitary anomalies and holoprosencephaly-like
features. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13424–9.
Figure 11 Postnatal image of neonate showing
meningomyelocoele.
BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6129 5of6
This pdf has been created automatically from the final edited text and images.
Copyright 2012 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved. For permission to reuse any of this content visit
http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BMJ Case Report Fellows may re-use this article for personal use and teaching without any further permission.
Please cite this article as follows (you will need to access the article online to obtain the date of publication).
Chaudhari HD, Thakkar G, Darji P, Khokhani P. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of holoprosencephaly and associated anomalies. BMJ Case Reports 2012;10.1136/
bcr-03-2012-6129, Published XXX
Become a Fellow of BMJ Case Reports today and you can:
▸Submit as many cases as you like
▸Enjoy fast sympathetic peer review and rapid publication of accepted articles
▸Access all the published articles
▸Re-use any of the published material for personal use and teaching without further permission
For information on Institutional Fellowships contact consortiasales@bmjgroup.com
Visit casereports.bmj.com for more articles like this and to become a Fellow
6of6 BMJ Case Reports 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-03-2012-6129