... The requirement to determine consistently and rapidly the global free energy minimum on the binding energy landscape addresses a kinetic aspect in computational studies of ligand–protein binding. Recent advances in computational structure prediction of ligand–protein complexes utilize a diverse range of energetic models, based on either surface complementarity (Shoichet and Kuntz, 1991; Wang, 1991; Jiang and Kim, 1991; Walls and Sternberg, 1992; Katchalski-Katzir et al., 1992; Stoddard and Koshland, 1993; Desjarlais and Dixon, 1994; Vakser and Aflalo, 1994; Lin et al., 1994; Jackson and Sternberg, 1995; Fisher et al., 1995; Norel et al., 1995; Sobolev et al., 1996) or atom–atom representations of the intermolecular interactions (Friedman et al., 1994; Gehlhaar et al., 1995; Luty et al., 1995; Rarey et al., 1996 Rarey et al., , 1997 Welch et al., 1996). These energetic models combined with stochastic optimization techniques (Goodsell and Olson, 1990; Yue, 1990; Cherfils et al., 1991; Caflish et al., 1992; Hart and Read, 1992; Di Nola et al., 1994; Clark and Ajay, 1995; Oshiro et al., 1995; Gehlhaar et al., 1995; Jones et al., 1997; Westhead et al., 1997; Apostolakis et al., 1998) have led to a number of powerful strategies for computational structure prediction of ligand–protein complexes. ...