... Sap flow measurements are the most useful technique for obtaining transpiration data, because other techniques such as the eddy covariance method cannot provide reliable measurements during and after rainfall (Mizutani et al., 1997); in contrast, sap flow measurements have the advantage that the instrumentation can be easily installed at accessible points on the tree, such as at the base of the stem. Since 1990s, the sap flow technique has been widely used to measure plant transpiration (e.g., Barrett et al., 1995;Schiller and Cohen, 1995;Edwards and Jèermák, 1996;Hall et al., 1998;MacNish et al., 2000;Green et al., 2003;O'Brien et al., 2004;Nicolas et al., 2005;Chang et al., 2006;Kume et al., 2006;Kigalu, 2007;McDowell et al., 2008;Xia et al., 2008;Yue et al., 2008). Sap flow data are generally obtained using two main measurement methods to quantify plant transpiration (Swanson, 1994;Kigalu, 2007): the heatpulse velocity, based on heat compensation theory, can measure the upstream xylem sap velocity and sapflow rate within a stem section (Dugas, 1990), but this technique is invasive and may damage the plant; the stem heat-balance method is less invasive, and estimates sap velocity (Steinberg et al., 1989;Ishida et al., 1991;Batho et al., 1994;Boersma and Weibel, 1995) using a small heater wrapped around the plant's stem or a branch to supply heat to that section of the plant, and therefore creates less damage to the plants (Kigalu, B. LIU, W. ZHAO AND B. JIN 2007). ...