Content uploaded by Kjetil Bevanger
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kjetil Bevanger on Mar 18, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Nygård'
et#al.'2010.'BOU#Proceedings#–#Climate#Change#and#Birds.
'
http://www.bou.org.uk/bouproc‐net/ccb/nygard‐etal.pdf'
'
©'2010'BOU'&'The'Author(s)'
1
This paper forms part of the proceedings from the BOU conference C l i m a t e Ch a n g e and B i r d s .
Other papers from these proceedings can be viewed at www.BOUPROC.net.
A study of White-tailed Eagle
Haliaeetus albicilla
movements
and mortality at a wind farm in Norway
Tor g eir N yg å rd, 1* Kj e til B ev a n ge r , 1 E s p en L ie D ah l , 1 Ø y s tei n Fl a gst a d,1
Arn e Fo l l es t a d, 1 P er n i lle L un d Ho e l,2 R oel M ay 1 & Ole Re i t an1
1Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway
2
Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, NO-0301 Oslo, Norway
*Corresponding author.
Email: torgeir.nygard@nina.no
The wind power plant on the island of Smøla, western Norway, is currently the largest in Norway; it has 68
turbines with nominal capacity of 2–2.3 MW each, hub height of 70 m and rotor blade radius of 38–41 m,. It was
constructed in two phases between 2001 and 2005. Approximately 60 White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla
territories are found in the whole Smøla archipelago. Before construction there were 13 Eagle pairs holding
territories in the wind farm area and within 500 m of it, whereas in 2009 this was reduced to only five. Since
1996, baseline data on the White-tailed Eagle population size and reproduction have been collected.
In a post-construction study, 50 fledglings were satellite-tagged during 2003–2009, of which 45 provided more
than 80 000 GPS positions in total. In addition to the geographical location, data on altitude and flight speed
were provided by the transmitters (Microwave Telemetry, Inc., Columbia, MD, USA). Juveniles of both sexes
stayed within the Smøla archipelago during their first winter. Most individuals moved away from the area during
spring in their second year (April–May). Females dispersed further than males, often more than 800 km during
summer, generally to the north. There was a return movement to the natal area during the second autumn. The
same pattern was repeated in the third and fourth years for females, while the males showed more philopatry
(Bevanger et al., 2009).
From August 2005 to May 2010, four of the satellite-tagged birds were killed by collisions with turbines, of 36
White-tailed Eagles in total, involving 20 adults, nine immatures and seven juveniles. April and May are the
months with the highest collision frequencies, with 13 (c. 36%) and nine (c. 25%) of the known fatalities.
Risk assessments were performed based on GPS positions during the different months of the year and the age of
the birds. The transmitters were programmed to transmit their positions at different intervals. Long time
intervals (up to 24 h) were used during winter, 3–6 h during spring and autumn, and 1–3 h during summer. An
analysis of moves showed that the birds changed positions on average 15 times per day, using a 100-m difference
between positions as an indicator of movement. Every change in position was considered to involve a collision
risk when the birds were at Smøla and its archipelago. Moves when they were elsewhere were not considered.
Monthly 95 and 50% utilization distributions (UDs) (Worton 1989) were produced using the positions from the
Smøla archipelago only, with all birds in each month and age-class pooled. The expected number of moves by
each bird was estimated by weighing the number of obtained positions by a factor equal to 15 divided by the pre-
programmed number of positions taken for each transmitter and month. The total number of expected moves
(Me) was then obtained by summing over all birds for each calendar year and month. Kernel UD (95 and 50%)
areas by calendar year and month (Ak95 and Ak50) were produced via ArcView 3.3, by using cross-validation and
Nygård'
et#al.'2010.'BOU#Proceedings#–#Climate#Change#and#Birds.
'
http://www.bou.org.uk/bouproc‐net/ccb/nygard‐etal.pdf'
'
©'2010'BOU'&'The'Author(s)'
2
the default smoothing factors. The total rotor-swept area (RSA) (At95 and At50) of turbines that overlapped each
kernel area was found by multiplying the number of turbines by the RSA (r², where r is the radius of the rotor-
blades). The probability of each position being within an RSA was then calculated as At95/Ak95 and At50/Ak50 for
each calendar year and month. The expected number of positions within an RSA was then calculated as Me*0.95
At/Ak and Me*0.5 At/Ak for the 95 and 50% kernel areas, respectively, for each calendar year and month.
Based on information from 34 birds for which the altitude was known (birds in their nests), a standard deviation
of altitude of 7.8 m was found. This was considered sufficient to produce an estimate of the fraction of the
flights within rotor height. Using only the data from positions when the birds were assumed to be flying (speed
> 0), we found that on average 24% of the flights in the wind farm were within rotor height. Calculations with
and without this figure as an adjustment factor were used. Figure 1 shows the expected number of positions
within an RSA per calendar year and month based on 95 and 50% UDs, and the number of actual kills of tagged
birds was registered.
Figure 1. The expected number of positions of satellite-tagged young White-tailed Eagles within the rotor-swept area at
Smøla wind farm by calendar year and month. Calculations were based on 50% kernel UDs (unadjusted for altitude = solid line,
adjusted = open dashed line) and 95% kernel UDs adjusted for altitude (= densely dashed line). Actual recorded kills of tagged
birds are shown as black dots. Note that the number of birds with working tags is decreasing with age, so the graph does not
indicate individual risk rate over time.
The method seems to be able to correctly identify the periods of the year and age-classes associated with the
greatest hazard rate, judged from the recorded casualties. Calculations based on the unadjusted 50% UDs seemed
to be the best predictor. It is worth noting that no avoidance rate was assumed, and that no adults were included.
Nygård'
et#al.'2010.'BOU#Proceedings#–#Climate#Change#and#Birds.
'
http://www.bou.org.uk/bouproc‐net/ccb/nygard‐etal.pdf'
'
©'2010'BOU'&'The'Author(s)'
3
The widely used Band method for collision risk assessment (Band et al. 2007) is often used in conjunction with
an avoidance factor based on observations and recorded kills. We did not attempt to calculate an avoidance rate,
as sufficient observational data from the field were not available. Furthermore, the number of moves per day was
based on estimations, and any movement may involve a combination of circling and directional flight at different
altitudes, and could involve risks connected with several of the 68 turbines. One should also bear in mind that
the studied birds had an affinity to the area, being their natal place. Thus, our findings are probably only typical
to juvenile White-tailed Eagles relatively close to their natal area; nevertheless, they are relevant for large parts of
the Norwegian coast. Displacement was probably negligible or small in our case, as all birds were born within or
close to the wind farm. On this basis, we suggest that the proposed avoidance rate proposed for Golden Eagles
Aquila chrysaetos (c. 99%) at other wind farms (Whitfield 2009) is not applicable to White-tailed Eagles in
connection with wind farms close to their breeding-sites. We are currently developing other risk assessment
methods based on GPS position data using the method of ‘Brownian bridges’ (May and Nygård, 2009) and by
using ground-truthed bird radar tracks.
Studies on Smøla have shown that White-tailed Eagles seem to use the air space inside and outside the wind farm
area similarly (Hoel, 2009). Several observers have noted that White-tailed Eagles at Smøla often circle close to
and around turbines, possibly induced by the extra wind energy created by the turbulence. The satellite-tagged
victims were either killed in the first autumn (two in September) or in the following spring (two in April). The
first autumn incidents may be influenced by lack of agility and experience, their naivety making them more prone
to collisions. The incidents during spring in their second calendar year coincide with an overall greater turbine-
related mortality rate during spring of all age-classes, possibly caused by increased territorial activity and good
thermal conditions.
A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the additional mortality caused by the wind farm at Smøla was c.
10%, reducing the cumulative survival through their third year of life from 0.84 to 0.74. A full population model
including adults is now under way, involving the use of DNA analysis of moulted feathers from nesting pairs to
estimate adult turnover rates.
References
Band, W., Madders, M. & Whitfield, D.P. 2007. Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at
wind farms. In: de Lucas, M., Janss, G.F.E. & Ferrer, M. (eds) Birds and Wind Farms. Risk Assessment and Mitigation: 259–
275. Madrid: Servicios Informativos Ambientales/Quercus.
Bevanger, K., Berntsen, F., Clausen, S., Dahl, E.L., Flagstad, Ø., Follestad, A., Halley, D., Hanssen, F., Hoel, P.L., Johnsen,
L., Kvaløy, P., May, R., Nygård, T., Pedersen, H.C., Reitan, O., Steinheim, Y. & Vang, R. 2009. Pre- and post-
construction studies of conflicts between birds and wind turbines in coastal Norway (BirdWind). Progress Report 2009.
In NINA Report. 505. Trondheim: Norsk institutt for naturforskning.
Hoel, P.L. 2009. Do wind power developments affect the behaviour of White Tailed Sea Eagles on Smøla? Master of science thesis,
Department of Biotechnology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
May, R. & Nygård, T. 2009. Spatial assessment of white-tailed sea eagle collision risk at the onshore wind-power plant on
the island of Smøla. In: 2nd European Congress of Conservation Biology. Conservation biology and beyond: from science to practice.
Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague.
http://www.eccb2009.org/uploads/book_of_abstracts_errata.pdf
Whitfield, D.P. 2009. Collision avoidance of Golden Eagles at wind farms under the ‘Band’ collision risk model. Banchory, UK: Natural
Research, Ltd.
Worton, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.
CITATION:
Nygård, T., Bevanger, K., Dahl, E.L., Flagsted, Ø
., Follestad, A., Hoel, P.H., May, R. & Reitan, O.
Nygård'
et#al.'2010.'BOU#Proceedings#–#Climate#Change#and#Birds.
'
http://www.bou.org.uk/bouproc‐net/ccb/nygard‐etal.pdf'
'
©'2010'BOU'&'The'Author(s)'
4
2010. A study of White-tailed Eagle movements and mortality at a wind farm in Norway. BOU Proceedings –
Climate Change and Birds. http://www.bou.org.uk/bouproc-net/ccb/nygard-etal.pdf