Content uploaded by Ana Claudia Swarca
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ana Claudia Swarca
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Mauro Nirchio
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Mauro Nirchio
Content may be subject to copyright.
Cytogenetic Characterization of Thalassophryne maculosa Gu¨ nther,
1861 (Pisces: Batrachoididae) from Margarita Island, Venezuela
M. NIRCHIO
1
,A.S.FENOCCHIO
2
,A.C.SWARC¸A
3
,A.L.DIAS
3
,L.GIULIANO−CAETANO
3
,
E. R
ON
1
,J.I.GAVIRIA
1
, AND J. E. PE
´
REZ
4
1
Escuela de Ciencias Aplicadas del Mar. Universidad de Oriente, Isla de Margarita, Venezuela.
Phone: ++58-295-2626003. Corresponding author: nirchio@cantv.net
2
Universidade Federal do Parana´, Departamento de Gene´tica, Centro Polite´cnico, Curitiba, Brazil.
afenocch@fceqyn.unam.edu.ar
3
Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Caixa Postal 6001, CEP 86051-990,
Londrina, PR, Brasil. szwarcy@sercomtel.com.br
4
Instituto Oceanogra´fico de Venezuela, Universidad de Oriente, Apartado 243, Cumana´, Venezuela. jperez@telcel.net.ve
A
BSTRACT.—A cytogenetic analysis by conventional Giemsa staining, C-banding, G-banding, Silver stain-
ing, and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) was carried out on Thalassophryne maculosa from Mar-
garita Island, Venezuela. T. maculosa exhibits a diploid complement 2n = 46, consisting of 12 metacentrics,
6 submetacentrics, 20 subtelocentrics and 8 acrocentrics with an NF of 84. Constitutive heterochromatin was
not abundant and was located only in the centromeric region in all chromosomes. A clear G-band pattern that
aids in a better chromosome pairing was obtained. Localization of Nucleolus Organiser Regions (NORs) on
the short arms of a medium-sized subtelocentric chromosome pair was detected with Ag-staining and was
also confirmed by FISH, using probes of 18S rDNA (from fish) and 45S rDNA (plant origin).
K
EYWORDS.—cytogenetics, marine fishes, chromosome banding, FISH
INTRODUCTION
Thalassophryne maculosa belongs to the
family Batrachoididae (Order Batrachoidi-
formes), a small group known as toadfishes
that contains over 70 species, with 21 gen-
era and three subfamilies (Greenfield et al.
1994; Greenfield 1997; Collette 2001; Froese
and Pauly 2003). T. maculosa is distributed
on the northern coast of South America off
Colombia and Venezuela, Aruba, Curac¸ao,
Margarita, Cubagua, Trinidad, and To-
bago, but not extending into the Antilles
(Collette 1966). It is one of the five recog-
nized species of toadfish reported for Ven-
ezuela and is common along sandy beaches
on the leeward side of Cubagua Island, and
on the southern side of Margarita Island
(Cervigo´n 1993).
Details about the karyotype of toadfishes
have been reported for Porichthys notatus
(Chen 1967; in Gold et al. 1980), Halobatra-
chus didactylus (Palazo´n et al. 2003), Ba-
trachoides pacifici (Nirchio et al. 2001), Am-
phichthys cryptocentrus, Batrachoides manglae,
Thalassophryne maculosa (Nirchio et al. 2002)
and Porichthys porosissimus (Brum et al.
2001). Most of these chromosomal studies
dealt with karyotype determined by Gi-
emsa staining, a conventional method that
allows describing chromosome number
and types. The use of special techniques
has not been extensively applied in this
group. Our objective was to determine con-
stitutive heterochromatin, G-Band pattern
and NOR localization and number of T.
maculosa using silver impregnation and
Fluorescence in situ Hybridization.
M
ATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed nine adult specimens (2 fe-
males and 4 males) of T. maculosa caught
near Margarita Island, Venezuela. Voucher
specimens were deposited at the Ichthyol-
ogy Collection of the Escuela de Ciencias
Aplicadas del Mar, Universidad de Ori-
ente. Chromosome preparation was per-
formed according to Nirchio et al. (2002)
Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 40, No. 2, 218-222, 2004
Copyright 2004 College of Arts and Sciences
University of Puerto Rico, Mayagu¨ez
218
but exposure time to colchicine was re-
duced from 5 to 3 hours. Conventional
karyotype was visualized by staining the
preparation for 20 minutes with a 10% Gi-
emsa solution in a phosphate buffer, pH
6.88. NOR silver staining was performed
using the method of Howell and Black
(1980). C- and G-banding were performed
using the methods of Sumner (1972) and
Cano et al. (1996), respectively. FISH with
18S rDNA probes from Oreochromis niloti-
cus and 45S from Triticum was performed
following Swarc¸a et al. (2001). At least 10
well-spread mitotic metaphases from each
individual were examined for each cytoge-
netical method applied.
Chromosomes were photographed
using a Nikon COOLPIX® 995 Digital
Camera following the microscopy set-
tings recommended by the manufac-
turer. (http://www.nikonusa.com/pdf/
CoolpixSeriesMtngInstructions.pdf). Im-
ages were stored as *.tif files and digitally
processed with ADOBE PHOTOSHOP
v.7.0. This software was also used for mea-
suring long arm (L), short arm (S) and con-
structing karyograms. Chromosomes were
classified according to the arm ratio criteria
(Levan et al. 1964).
R
ESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The chromosomes (2n = 46) were ar-
ranged in decreasing size and centromere
position and distributed in four types: 12M,
6SM, 20ST, 8A (NF = 84) (Fig. 1). These data
do not agree with Nirchio et al. (2002) who
reported 2n = 46 but 8M, 6SM, 32A (NF =
60). For classifying the karyotype of T.
maculosa, Nirchio et al. (2002) used a con-
ventional caliper (precision = 0.05 mm), to
measure chromosome arm length, whereas
in the present report, these lengths were
obtained with the measure tool (precision =
0.01 mm) of the software used for process-
ing the digitalized images of metaphase
spreads. Additionally, the reduction in ex-
position time to colchicine (see materials
and methods), produced better chromo-
some preparations, morphology identifica-
tion and arms length determination. These
features explain the differences in the com-
position of chromosome types, mainly in
FIG.1. Thalassophryne maculosa: Conventional Giemsa stained karyotype A: male, B: female. In box: Ag-stained
NOR-bearing chromosomes identified by sequential staining.
KARYOLOGY OF THALASSOPHRYNE MACULOSA 219
the number of bi-armed (metacentrics, sub-
telocentrics) elements, and consequently,
the NF values.
The C-bands were present in centromeric
regions in almost all chromosomes; the
band pattern indicated the presence of het-
erochromatic regions restricted to centro
meres (Fig. 2). As far as we know, Porichthys
porosissimus (2n = 44), a toadfish recently
karyotyped by Brum et al. (2001), is the
only species whose chromosomes were also
C-banded and the bands appeared as pale
pericentromeric blocks, except for the two
larger chromosome pairs in which a large
heterochromatic segment along both arms
was present, beside the centromeric region.
This different feature between Talasophryne
and Porichthys suggests that C-bands could
be a good cytotaxonomic marker in the
family Batrachoididae.
An accurate classification of homologous
chromosomes, using only Giemsa staining,
is not always possible because differences
in chromosome size and arm ratios are of-
ten small between adjacent pairs within a
size-graded series. In these cases G-
banding is helpful to improve pairing. A
consistent G-band pattern that allowed
pairing practically all chromosomes (Fig. 3)
was obtained in T. maculosa. This result
suggests the existence of genome compart-
mentalization in this species, but chromo-
some types, arranged in decreasing size or-
der, were difficult to identify. G-banding
has been reported for several fish species
(Gold and Li 1990; Abuı´n et al. 1996; Ber-
tollo et al. 1997), which indicates that fail-
ure to obtain it could be due to technical
problems in the use of banding protocols
rather than to total absence of structural
compartmentalization in the fish genome
as proposed by Saitoh and Laemmli (1994)
and Maistro et al. (1999). As in most tel-
eostean fish (Gold and Amemiya 1987; Vit-
turi et al. 1995), Ag-stained metaphases
from T. maculosa exhibited positive signals
in only one chromosome pair (N° 16) of
medium-sized subtelocentric chromo-
somes; the black dots were located termi-
nally on the short arms of these chromo-
somes (Fig. 1). Palazo´n et al. (2003) also
reported in Halobatrachus didactylus a single
pair of NOR-bearing chromosomes but
submetacentric instead of subtelocentric.
Brum (2001) attempted to describe the
NOR patterns of P. porosissimus but, al-
though no satisfactory results were ob-
tained, they inferred the occurrence of
more than a single NOR-bearing pair on
the base of the presence of one to three
nucleoli per nucleus when the silver nitrate
technique was applied.
FIG.2. Thalassophryne maculosa: C-banded karyotype
M. NIRCHIO ET AL.220
Silver staining is a method, which only
demonstrates the residues of the Ag stain-
able rRNAprotein complex synthesized by
the active NORs in the preceding inter-
phase (Howell and Black 1980), thus, the
Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)
approach was applied in the chromosomes
of this group of fish, and bright signals
were obtained. FISH applied to study the
NORs using probes of 18S rDNA from fish
(Oreochromis niloticus) and of 45S rDNA
from plants (Triticum) revealed fluorescent
signals in the same regions on the short
arms of the two subtelocentric chromo-
somes identified using silver salts (Fig. 4),
and demonstrates that T. maculosa does not
possess additional NORs. The strongest
signal was obtained when the 45S rDNA
probe was applied probably because the
plant probe is constituted by the entire
gene sequence, a longer probe, whereas the
fish obtained probe (18S rDNA) is only the
sequence of the ribosomal gene.
The present report represents the first cy-
FIG.3. Thalassophryne maculosa: G-banded karyotype
FIG.4. Thalassophryne maculosa: FISH with 18S rDNA from fish (A) and 45S rDNA from a plant (B).
KARYOLOGY OF THALASSOPHRYNE MACULOSA 221
togenetic study that used banding, fluores-
cent and molecular techniques of a marine
Neotropical fish species. It could contribute
to cytotaxonomic and evolutionary studies.
Acknowledgements.—The authors are
grateful for the valuable comments and
suggestions on the manuscript given by Dr.
Angelo Libertini (CNR-ISMAR − Sezione di
Venezia) and Dr. Claudio Oliveira (Univer-
sidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Bra-
zil). This work was supported by Consejo
de Investigacio´n of Universidad de Oriente
and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvim-
ento Cientı´fico e Tecnolo´gico (CNPq) and
to CAPES for fellow to ACS.
L
ITERATURE CITED
Abuı´n, M., P. Martı´nez, and L. Sa´nchez. 1996. G- like
banding pattern in two salmonids species: Onko-
rhynchus mykiss and Onkorhynchus kisutch. Chromo-
some Research 4:471-473.
Bertollo, L. A. C., M. S. Fontes, A. S. Fenocchio, and J.
Cano. 1997. The X1X2Y sex chromosome system in
the fish Hoplias malabaricus. I G-, C- and chromo-
some replication banding. Chromosome Research 5:
493-499.
Brum, M. J. I., P. R. A. M. Affonso, L. C. G. Mota, E.
Pauls, and M. R. C. B. Netto. 2001. Cytogenetic
characterization of Porichthys porosissimus (Valenci-
ennes, 1857) (Batrachoididae, Batrachoidiformes)
from the Rio de Janeiro Coast, Brazil. Chromosome
Science 5:15-18.
Cano, J., A. Pretel, S. Melendez, F. Garcia, V. Caputo,
A. S. Fenocchio, and L. A. C. Bertollo. 1996. Deter-
mination of early stages of sex chromosome differ-
ention in the sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax L. (Pi-
sces, Perciformes). Cytobios 87:45-59.
Cervigo´ n, F. 1993. Los peces marinos de Venezuela. 2ª
ed. Volumen II. Caracas, Venezuela: Fundacio´n Ci-
entı´fica Los Roques.
Chen, T. T. 1967. Comparative Karyology of selected
deep-sea and shallow water teleost fishes. Ph. D.
diss., Yale University. (Cited from Gold et al.,
1980).
Collette, B. B. 1966. A review of the venomous toad-
fishes, subfamily Thalassophryninae. Copeia 4:846-
864.
Collette, B. B. 2001. Opsanus dichrostomus, a new toad-
fish (Teleostei: Batrachoididae) from the western
Caribbean Sea and southern Gulf of Mexico. Occa-
sional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of
Michigan. 731:16 p.
Froese, R., and D. Pauly, Editors. 2003. FishBase.
World Wide Web electronic publication. www.
fishbase.org , version 24 september 2003.
Gold, J. R., and C. T. Amemiya. 1987. Genome size
variation in North American minnows (Cyprini-
dae). II. Variation among 20 species. Genome 29:
481-489.
Gold, J. R., and Y. C. Li. 1990. Trypsin G-banding of
North American cyprinid chromosomes: phyloge-
netics considerations, implications for fish chromo-
somes structure and chromosomal polymorphism.
Cytologia 56:199-208.
Gold, J. R., W. J. Karel, and M. R. Strand. 1980. Chro-
mosome Formulae of North American Fishes. The
Progressive Fish-Culturist 42(1):10-23.
Greenfield, D. W. 1997. Allenbatrachus, a new genus of
Indo-Pacific toadfish (Batrachoididae). Pacific Sci-
ence 51:306-313.
Greenfield, D. W., J. K. L. Mee, and J. E. Randall. 1994.
Bifax lacinaia, a new genus and species of toadfish
(Batrachoididae) from the south coast of Oman.
Fauna Saudia Arabia 14:276-281.
Howell, W. M., and D. A. Black. 1980. Controlled sil-
ver staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a
protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method.
Experientia 3:1014-1015.
Levan, A., K. Fredga, and A. A. Sandberg. 1964. No-
menclature for centromeric position on chromo-
somes. Hereditas 52:201-220.
Maistro, E. L., F. Foresti, and C. Oliveira., 1999. R- and
G-band patterns in Astyanax scabiprinnis paranae
(Pisces, Characiformes, Characidae). Genetics and
Molecular Biology 22(2):201-204.
Nirchio, M., J. A. Go´mez, and J. Villalaz. 2001. Cari-
otipo del pez sapo Batrachoides pacifici (Batrachoi-
didae: Teleostei) de la costa del Pacı´fico de
Panama´. Saber 13(1):82-84.
Nirchio, M., B. J. Turner, J. E. Pe´rez, J. I. Gaviria, and
H. Cequea. 2002. Karyotypes of three species of
toadfish (Batrachoididae: Teleostei) from Mar-
garita Island, Venezuela. Scientia Marina 66(1):3-4.
Palazo´ n, J. L., M. Nirchio, and C. Sarasquete. 2003.
Conventional karyotype and nucleolar organiser
regions of the toadfish Halobatrachus didactylus
(Schneider, 1801) (Pisces: Batrachoididae). Scientia
Marina 67(4):445-449.
Saitoh, Y., and U. K. Laemmli. 1994. Metaphase chro-
mosome structure: bands arise from a differential
folding path of the highly AT-rich scaffold. Cell
76:609-622.
Sumner, A. T. 1972. A simple technique for demon-
strating centromeric heterochromatin. Experimental
Cell Research 75:304-306.
Swarc¸a, A. C., M. M. Cestari, L. Giuliano-Caetano, and
A. L. Dias. 2001. Cytogenetic Characterization of
the Large South American Siluriform Fish Species
Zungaro zungaro (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Chromosome
Science 5:51-55.
Vitturi, R., E. Catalano, M. S. Colomba, L. Mon-
tagnino, and L. Pellerito, 1995. Karyotype analysis
of Aphanius fasciatus (Pisces, Cyprinodontiformes)
Ag-NORs and C-band polymorphism in four
populations from Sicily. Biologisches Zentralblatt.
114:392-402.
M. NIRCHIO ET AL.222