ArticlePDF Available

ANT (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) RECORDS FROM SHRI SHIVAJI SCIENCE COLLEGE CAMPUS, AMRAVATI, INDIA

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Department of Zoology, Shri Shivaji Science College, Morshi Road, Amravati. 444603, India.

PDFARDI
ISSN : 2249-8346
RNI: MAHENG12834
SCIENCE COLLEGE CAMPUS, AMRAVATI, INDIA
ABSTRACT
During a survey on 16 to 22 September
five subfamilies (Ponerinae
,
Formicinae) and 14 genera from Shri Shivaji Science College, Amravati Campus. Among
them three species were new records for
Tetraponera aitkenii (Forel),
Technomyrmex albipes
KEYWORDS
:
Formicidae, Ant, Amravati.
Amravati
is a city in the state of
populated metropolitan city in
Maharashtra
77.75°E
. It has an average elevation of 343
of Nagpur
, and serves as the administrative center of
Revenue Division
. Amravati has a
from March to June.
In India, a few reports on ants ecology and diversity exist. (Gunawardene
published work on ants of the Western Ghats
reported the ant fauna from some areas of Bangalore City. Recently a list of 591 species of
ants in India was released by (Bharti
of Amravati city and allied region, India, was by
species in 20 genera belonging to five subfamilies.
Department of Zoology, Shri Shivaji Science College, Morshi Road, Amravati. 444603, India.
PDFARDI
J [PRINT] 2012, 3(12);(P) 114–117
Available online at
www.pgspcf.org
ISSN : 2249

Applied Research
Development Institute Journal
ANT (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) RECORDS FROM SHRI SHIVAJI
SCIENCE COLLEGE CAMPUS, AMRAVATI, INDIA
Dr. Jayashree Dhote
During a survey on 16 to 22 September
2001, 16 species of ants were collected from
,
Pseudomyrmecinae, Myrmicinae, Dolichoderinae and
Formicinae) and 14 genera from Shri Shivaji Science College, Amravati Campus. Among
them three species were new records for
Amravati (Odontoponera
sp. (F. Smith),
Technomyrmex albipes
(F. Smith,).
Formicidae, Ant, Amravati.
INTRODUCTION
is a city in the state of
Maharashtra, India
and it is the seventh most
Maharashtra
. Amravati is located at 20°56N
77°45
. It has an average elevation of 343
meters (1125 feet). It lies 156
km (97 miles) west
, and serves as the administrative center of
Amravati District
and of
. Amravati has a
tropical wet and dry climate
with hot and dry summers
In India, a few reports on ants ecology and diversity exist. (Gunawardene
published work on ants of the Western Ghats
SriLanka hotspot. (Kumar
reported the ant fauna from some areas of Bangalore City. Recently a list of 591 species of
ants in India was released by (Bharti
et al., 2007) The first comprehens
ive study on the ants
of Amravati city and allied region, India, was by
(Chavhan et al.,
2010) who recorded 34
species in 20 genera belonging to five subfamilies.
Department of Zoology, Shri Shivaji Science College, Morshi Road, Amravati. 444603, India.
P a g e | 114
ISSN : 2249
-8346

Applied Research
And
Development Institute Journal
ANT (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) RECORDS FROM SHRI SHIVAJI
2001, 16 species of ants were collected from
Pseudomyrmecinae, Myrmicinae, Dolichoderinae and
Formicinae) and 14 genera from Shri Shivaji Science College, Amravati Campus. Among
sp. (F. Smith),
and it is the seventh most
77°45
E20.93°N
km (97 miles) west
and of
Amravati
with hot and dry summers
In India, a few reports on ants ecology and diversity exist. (Gunawardene
et al., 2007)
SriLanka hotspot. (Kumar
et al., 1997)
reported the ant fauna from some areas of Bangalore City. Recently a list of 591 species of
ive study on the ants
2010) who recorded 34
Dr. Jayashree Dhote
 PDFARDIJ [PRINT] 2012, 3(12);(P) 114 – 117 
The areas are highly altered due to urbanization and industrialization, and only a few
patches of natural vegetation still remain. The aim of this study was to clarify the ant fauna of
the area, and add new records to the list of Indian ants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ant Sampling:
In the present study ants were collected from the ground and various trees at the sites.
Ants were more readily visible on trees than on the ground, but also collected from the
ground when seen. No gyne or male was collected in the present study as no nest was dug to
collect samples. Ants were collected from 11 to 22 September, 2011between 10:00 and
15:00h using a sieve, tray and forceps and kept in small plastic vials containing 70 % alcohol.
Ants identification
The collected ants were identified up to the genus level by using Stemi DV4 stereo
microscope based on Taxonomic keys of Bolton (1994); Bingham (1903) and Holldobler
(1990). Species level identification of the ant were made base on morphological character
using taxanomic key of Tiwari, et al (1998), Mathew and Tiwari, (2000)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 1: Ant species (Formicidae) collected from the study sites at Shri Shivaji Science
College Campus, Amravati, India in September 2011.
Subfamily Species Stratum Collection
Ponerinae Odontoponera sp. (F. Smith,1858)) Fruit tree N
Diacamma sp. (Santschi, 1920)) Fruit tree
Pseudomyrmecinae Tetraponera allaborans (Walker, 1859) Mango trees
Tetraponera aitkenii (Forel, 1902) Mango trees N
Myrmicinae Crematogaster rothneyi (forel 1878) ground
Crematogaster sp. ground
Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus, 1758) ground
Pheidologeton diversus (Jerdon, 1851) ground
Dolichoderinae Dolichoderus sp. (Emery, 1889) tree2
Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793 ground
Technomyrmex albipes (F. Smith, 1861) ground N
Formicinae Oecophyla smaragdina (Fabricius, 1775) tree
Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille, 1802) ground
Dr. Jayashree Dhote
 PDFARDIJ [PRINT] 2012, 3(12);(P) 114 – 117 
Plagiolepis sp. tree2
Camponotus rufoglaucus (Jerdon, 1851) Ficus tree
Polyrhachis (Myrmhopla) caligata Emery, 1895 Ficus tree
Note: N- new records for the region.
The ant species (Formicidae) found during the survey are listed in Table 1. A total of
16 species were collected from the area in five subfamilies (Ponerinae, Pseudomyrmecinae,
Myrmicinae, Dolichoderinae and Formicinae) and 14 genera. Three species are new records
for the region; including the present records the current total number of ant species identified
in India is approximately 600 species from 81 genera (http://antbase.org, dated 05 Oct, 2011).
As mentioned this survey is a part of a continued effort that will collect from all habitats of
the study; therefore a comprehensive inventory of the ants of India is ultimately envisaged.
Odontoponera sp. (F. Smith) is a new record in this region, but is widespread in the Oriental
region, especially in disturbed areas. Tetraponera allaborans is found throughout Country
Mathew and Tiwari (2000). The species is widespread in tropical Asia and Australia
(Bingham 1903; Ward 2001). Tetraponera aitkenii (Forel) is new to this region. This species
is known from southern India, and once in Malaysia (Ward 2001).
Monomorium pharaonis (Linnaeus) is a tramp species found all over India Tiwari et
al. (1998). Bingham (1903) noted the species is widespread throughout the tropical regions of
both hemispheres. Pheidologeton diversus (Jerdon) is common all over India (Tiwari 2000,
Bolton 1995).
Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius) is widespread in tropical and subtropical
regions of the world (Bingham 1903). Technomyrmex albipes (F. Smith) is new to the area,
and possibly to Maharashtra Stae. The species is found widely in tropical Asia. Oecophylla
smaragdina (Fabricius) is widely distributed in India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka. The range of
this species extends through the Malayan subregion to Australia and New Guinea (Bingham
1903). Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille) is another pantropical species that has been
recorded in the present study. Plagiolepis sp. was collected from a tree. Plagiolepis dichroa
Forel is common throughout India (Tiwari et al 1998), but it is not certain that the present
record is of this species.
Foragers of Camponotus rufoglaucus (Jerdon) were also recorded before for this
region (Arvind et al) and other part of country (Bingham 1903). This species is found in
various parts of Myanmar (Bingham 1903). The species has a very wide range of occurrence
from Australia to Africa. Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) sp. foragers were collected from a
Ficus tree. This may be the first record of a Tanaemyrmex species for this region. Some of
Dr. Jayashree Dhote
 PDFARDIJ [PRINT] 2012, 3(12);(P) 114 – 117 
the species that were collected in the disturbed areas are tramp or pantropical species, which
implies the survey site, was severely altered by human activities, even some patchy
vegetation still remained.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Author grateful to Mr. Aravind Chavhan, (JRF) UGC-MRP, Department of Zoology,
Shri Shivaji Science College, Amravati for his help in the identification of ant up to species
level. Author grateful to Mr. Suraj Pawar, Mr. Prashant Mankar and Mr. Rahul Sartape, P.G.
Students, Department of Zoology, Shri Shivaji Science College, Amravati for their help in
ants collection.
REFERENCES
1. AB Chavhan; SS Pawar. 2011, 6 (4): 395-400.
2. H Bharti; GD Alper, 2007. Ants of India. Downloaded from www.antdiversity.com/ 26
December 2007.
3. CT Bingham 1903, Hymenoptera 2: 506 pp.
4. B Bolton, 1995. A New General Catalogue of the Ants of the World. Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, 504 pp.
5. NR Gunawardene; AE Daniels;G Dulip; CV Gunatilleke; PV Karunakaran;KG Nayak, S
Prasad; P Puyravaud; BR Ramesh; KA Subramanian and G Vasanthy, 2007. Current
Science 93 (11): 1567-1572.
6. B Holldobler; E.O. Wilson, 1990. The Ants. Springer-Verlag.
7. R. Mathew;RN Tiwari, 2000. State Fauna Series 4, Zoological Survey of India Fauna of
Meghalaya 7 : 251-409.
8. S Kumar; M Shrihari; KT Nair; P Varghese;R Gadagkar, 1997. Insect Environment 3(1):
3-5.
9. RN Tiwari;BG Kundu;S RoyChoudhury; SN Ghosh, 1998. State Fauna Series 3,
Zoological Survey of India, Fauna of West Bengal 8: 211-294.
10. PS Ward, 2001. Invertebrate Taxonomy 15: 589-665.
***** *****
... Andaman and Nicobar Islands (12,161,189,254,315) Tapinoma Tapinoma andamanense Forel, 1903 (E) Andaman and Nicobar Islands (114,161,189,254,315) Tapinoma annandalei (Wheeler, 1928) (7,124,125,178,205,206,214,260,262,287,306,315,335,337,340,342,352,362), Kerala (225), Maharashtra (129,178,229,257,335,337,340,342), Manipur (1), Meghalaya (1), Mizoram (1), Nagaland (1), Orissa (257,335,337,340,342), Punjab (29,79,342), Rajasthan (331,333,334,335,337,338,340,342,343,344), Sikkim (1), Tamil Nadu (178,205,206,286,289,293,335,337,340,342,352), Tripura (1), Uttar Pradesh (2, 3, 326), Uttarakhand (1), West Bengal (1) Tapinoma wroughtonii Forel, 1904 Haryana (408), Jammu & Kashmir (7,114,161,162,192,315), Karnataka (352), West Bengal (352) Aenictus dentatus Maharashtra ( Andaman and Nicobar Islands (254,352,355), Arunachal Pradesh (1), Assam (1), Goa (7), Gujarat (158,184,261,352,355,399), Karnataka (7,12,114,158,184,261,287,399), Kerala (7,12,114,158,184,261,352,355,391,399), Maharashtra (355), Meghalaya (1), Nagaland (1), Sikkim (1), Tamil Nadu (7,213,352,399), West Bengal (1) Aenictus gleadowii Forel, 1901 (E) Andaman and Nicobar Islands (191), Karnataka (7,114,158,184,352), West Bengal (352) Aenictus hodgsoni Andaman and Nicobar Islands (189) ...
... (1), Uttarakhand (1) Nylanderia taylori (Forel, 1894) Assam (1) Gujarat (338,340,344), Himachal Pradesh (46) (125,205,260,262,264,264,265,287,288,306,327,357,362), Kerala (294,305), Maharashtra (115,129,177,214,229,257,335,342), Manipur (1), Meghalaya (1), Mizoram (1), Nagaland (1), Orissa (205,257,335,342,357), Punjab (29,79,214), Rajasthan (334,335,342) Forel, 1904 Himachal Pradesh (190,192), Jammu & Kashmir (1), Punjab (1), Sikkim (1), Uttarakhand (1) Polyrhachis moeschi Forel, 1912 Andaman and Nicobar Islands (297) Polyrhachis mutata Smith, 1858 Meghalaya (1) ...
... Monomorium atomum Arunachal Pradesh (1), Assam (1), Goa (411,412), Karnataka (262,335,362), Maharashtra (186,188,262,331,335), Orissa (186,188), Punjab (335), Rajasthan (331,334,335,338,344), Sikkim (1), West Bengal (1) Monomorium atomum integrium Forel, 1902 (E) Maharashtra (186,188,194) Monomorium biroi Forel, 1907 (E) Tamil Nadu (194) Monomorium carbonarium (Smith, 1858) (I) Kerala (188) Monomorium dichroum Karnataka (186,188,265,287,288), Maharashtra (7,186,188), Tamil Nadu (186,188,352), Uttar Pradesh (200) (262,265,287,288,306,335,336,337,340,342), Maharashtra (7,194,195,287,331,335,336,337,340,342,352), Manipur (1), Orissa (415), Punjab (29,79,214,287,331,335,336,337,340,342,352), Rajasthan (116,331,332,334,335,335,336,337,338,339,340,342,344), Sikkim (1), Tamil Nadu (194,331,335,336,337,340,342,352), Uttar Pradesh (214) Arunachal Pradesh (1), Assam (1), Karnataka (92,188,265,287,288), Kerala (294), Maharashtra (188,214), Manipur (1), Orissa (188,205,335,357), Rajasthan (331,334,335,338,344), Sikkim (1), Tamil Nadu (92,194,205,289,335,352,357), Uttar Pradesh (3, 326), Uttarakhand (1), West Bengal (1) Monomorium longi Arunachal Pradesh (1), Assam (1), Meghalaya (1), Rajasthan (332,334,335), Tripura (247, 250, 335) Monomorium luisae Forel, 1904 Jammu & Kashmir (166) Monomorium monomorium Bolton, 1987 (410,411,412), Gujarat (335,336,340,342), Haryana (114,335,336,340,342), Himachal Pradesh (335,336,340,342), Jammu & Kashmir (80), Karnataka (125,205,262,265,287,288,306,336,340,352), Kerala (92), Maharashtra (129,229), Manipur (1), Meghalaya (1), Mizoram (1), Nagaland (1), Orissa (415), Punjab (79,335,336,340,342), Rajasthan (331,334,335,336,338,342,344), Sikkim (1), Tamil Nadu (286), Uttar Pradesh (335, 336, 340, 342), Uttarakhand (1), West Bengal (1) Monomorium rugifrons (Smith, 1858) India (no further state, 32) Monomorium sagei Andaman and Nicobar Islands (254,257), Himachal Pradesh (186,188,192,257,272,332,342), Jammu & Kashmir (80), Karnataka (335,342), Rajasthan (332, 334, 335, 342) Monomorium schurri Kerala (249,352), Madhya Pradesh (188) Himachal Pradesh (7, 34) Myrmica aimonissabaudiae Menozzi, 1939 Arunachal Pradesh (1), Himachal Pradesh (280), Jammu & Kashmir (7,80,280), Meghalaya (1), Sikkim (1), West Bengal (1) Myrmica cachmiriensis Forel, 1904 Himachal Pradesh (1), Jammu & Kashmir (7,80,190,190,192 Jammu & Kashmir (7,80,190,192,280,281,283,375) Myrmica hecate Weber, 1947 Arunachal Pradesh (1) Himachal Pradesh (1), Jammu & Kashmir (7,80,279,280,283) Myrmica ordinaria Radchenko & Elmes, 1999 Jammu & Kashmir (7,80,279,280,283) Myrmica pachei Forel, 1906 Arunachal Pradesh ( ...
Article
Full-text available
As one of the 17 megadiverse countries of the world and with four biodiversity hotspots represented in its borders, India is home to an impressive diversity of life forms. However, much work remains to document and catalogue the species of India and their geographic distributions, especially for diverse invertebrate groups. In the present study, a comprehensive and critical list of Indian ant species is provided with up-to- date state-wise distribution. A total of 828 valid species and subspecies names belonging to 100 genera are listed from India. Potential erroneous data, misidentifications and dubious distributional records that may exist in the literature are also identified. Te present exhaustive listing of Indian ants will provide a holistic view about diversity and distribution and will also help to identify major undersampled areas where future sampling and taxonomic efforts should be directed.
Article
We investigate the dynamics of ant biodiversity patterns and community structure from the Eocene until the present. Our goal is to empirically test hypotheses regarding the similarities in composition and structure of fossil and modern ant faunas to understand the historical processes influencing modern global biodiversity patterns.LocationGlobal.Methods We integrated two recently developed databases of the geographical distributions of fossil and modern ant genera and analysed the evolution of diversity and composition since the Eocene, c. 55 Ma. We assembled a third new database on community structure of ants, and used it to compare community structure of fossil assemblages with modern communities in different bioregions.ResultsThe analyses of generic composition and community structure were congruent, supporting a strong affinity between the Western Palaearctic ant fauna and modern Indomalayan and Australasian assemblages, and of a widespread Holarctic ant palaeofauna, and affinity between fossil Caribbean and modern Neotropical faunas. In addition, neither generic composition nor community structure of fossil assemblages showed evidence of taphonomic bias towards arboreal taxa.Main Conclusions The aggregated fossil record reveals the dynamic nature of macroecological patterns in ant biodiversity during the Cenozoic, with continental-scale generic extinctions common and important in shaping modern ant assemblages. Our results suggest major compositional changes for the Western Palaearctic bioregion and the Caribbean bioregions. The ant palaeofauna of the Western Palaearctic bioregion was then very similar in composition and structure to the one observed now in the Indomalayan bioregion, supporting the notion that modern-day ‘tropical’ biomes were historically much more widespread, while temperate biotas are more recently evolved. Our results underscore the importance of a palaeogeographical perspective in understanding modern-day macroecological patterns.
Article
The dominance of ants in the terrestrial biosphere has few equals among animals today, but this was not always the case. The oldest ants appear in the fossil record 100 million years ago, but given the scarcity of their fossils, it is presumed they were relatively minor components of Mesozoic insect life. The ant fossil record consists of two primary types of fossils, each with inherent biases: as imprints in rock and as inclusions in fossilized resins (amber). New imaging technology allows ancient ant fossils to be examined in ways never before possible. This is particularly helpful because it can be difficult to distinguish true ants from non-ants in Mesozoic fossils. Fossil discoveries continue to inform our understanding of ancient ant morphological diversity, as well as provide insights into their paleobiology.
Article
Full-text available
The study tried to explore the distribution ants in forest, grassland and human habitats located around Amravati city. In this area, thirty four species of ants in twenty genera were identified. These ant species belong to five subfamily; Formicinae, Myrmicinae, Ponerinae, Dolichoderinae and Pseudomyrmicinae. The dominant genus was Crematogaster followed by the genera Pheidole and Camponotus. Among these three habitats, the similarity index of ant species between forest and human habitat was the highest. The indices of dominance in forest and human habitat indicate that the genera Crematogaster is most adapted genera in forest and human habitat. The ant, Oecophylla smaragdina is firstly recorded in the Amravati region.
State Fauna Series 3, Zoological Survey of India
  • Rn Tiwari
  • Kundu
  • Roychoudhury
  • Ghosh
RN Tiwari;BG Kundu;S RoyChoudhury; SN Ghosh, 1998. State Fauna Series 3, Zoological Survey of India, Fauna of West Bengal 8: 211-294.
  • R Mathew
  • Tiwari
R. Mathew;RN Tiwari, 2000. State Fauna Series 4, Zoological Survey of India Fauna of Meghalaya 7 : 251-409.
  • R Gadagkar
R Gadagkar, 1997. Insect Environment 3(1): 3-5.
  • P S Ward
PS Ward, 2001. Invertebrate Taxonomy 15: 589-665.