Content uploaded by Zhao-Hua Cheng
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Zhao-Hua Cheng
Content may be subject to copyright.
Pressure enhancement of the giant magnetocaloric effect in LaFe11.6Si1.4
Young Suna兲
State Key Laboratory of Magnetism, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080,
China and Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China
Z. Arnold and J. Kamarad
Institute of Physics AS CR, Na Slovance 2, 182 21 Prague 8, Czech Republic
Guang-Jun Wang, Bao-Gen Shen, and Zhao-Hua Cheng
State Key Laboratory of Magnetism, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing 100080, China
共Received 26 June 2006; accepted 13 September 2006; published online 27 October 2006兲
The authors have studied the effects of pressure on the magnetocaloric effect in a polycrystalline
LaFe11.6Si1.4 sample. The Curie temperature TCof the sample rapidly decreases from 191 K at
ambient pressure to 80 K under 8.3 kbar pressure. The metamagnetic transition induced by field at
temperatures above TCbecomes extremely sharp under high pressure and the critical field Hcof the
transition increases fast with increasing temperature. As a result, the giant magnetocaloric effect in
LaFe11.6Si1.4 is greatly enhanced by pressure, especially at low magnetic fields. For a field variation
of 1 T only, the maximum value of the entropy change is as high as 34 J/kg K. © 2006 American
Institute of Physics.关DOI: 10.1063/1.2372584兴
Magnetic refrigeration based on the magnetocaloric ef-
fect 共MCE兲has become a promising competitive technology
for the conventional gas-compression/expansion technique.1
MCE is an intrinsic thermodynamic property of magnetic
materials that results from the coupling of a magnetic system
with a magnetic field. It manifests itself as an adiabatic tem-
perature change or an isothermal entropy change in response
to a variation of external magnetic fields. A variety of mate-
rials has been found to exhibit a large MCE at different tem-
perature ranges. Some of the good examples include Gd
element,2Gd5共SixGe1−x兲4,3Ni–Mn–Ga alloys,4MnAs,5
MnFeP1−xAsx,6LaFe13−xSix,7,8the perovskite manganites,9,10
and others.
Recently, it was found that the MCE in magnetic com-
pounds with strong spin-lattice coupling can be significantly
affected by external pressure.11–13 Morellon et al. first stud-
ied the effects of pressure on MCE in Tb5Si2Ge2.11 They
found that external pressure can tune the magnetic phase
transition and induce a giant MCE in this material. Mean-
while, Gama et al. recently reported the pressure-induced
colossal MCE in MnAs.12 The maximum value of ⌬Sin
MnAs under a pressure of 0.23 GPa reaches 267 J/ 共kg K兲,
far greater than the assumed magnetic entropy limit. More
recently, our group studied the effects of pressure on the
MCE in a La0.69Ca0.31MnO3manganite and found that the
MCE can be effectively tuned by external pressure.13 All
these studies have demonstrated successfully that the pres-
sure tuning of MCE in certain materials can open an impor-
tant and effective strategy for the development of magnetic
refrigeration based on MCE.
The LaFe13−xSixcompounds and their variants are
among the most promising candidates for magnetic
refrigeration.7,8Recent work has well confirmed that these
compounds exhibit a large magnetovolume effect accompa-
nying with the first-order paramagnetic to ferromagnetic
transition.14 Therefore, it is worthwhile to expect a signifi-
cant influence of external pressure on this phase transition in
LaFe13−xSixand recently, this has been also proven by pres-
sure experiments.15 Nevertheless, the effects of pressure on
the MCE in LaFe13−xSixhave not been reported so far. In this
work, we have performed such a study in a LaFe11.6Si1.4
sample. It is found that the giant MCE in LaFe11.6Si1.4 is
greatly enhanced by pressure. The magnetic entropy change
for a 1 T field variation exceeds 30 J/ kg K when under pres-
sures, which sets a record of low-field MCE.
Polycrystalline LaFe11.6Si1.4 samples were prepared by
arc melting in an atmosphere of ultrapure argon gas. The
purity of the starting elements was better than 99.9 wt %.
The ingots were remelted three times to ensure homogeneity,
annealed in vacuum at 1273 K for 50 days, and then
quenched in liquid nitrogen. The single phase with the
NaZn13-type structure of as-prepared samples was confirmed
by powder x-ray diffraction at room temperature. The mag-
netization measurements under high hydrostatic pressures
were performed using a superconducting quantum interfer-
ence device magnetometer 共Quantum Design Co.兲in mag-
netic fields up to 5 T. The sample was compressed in a min-
iature nonmagnetic CuBe pressure cell that was filled by a
mixture of mineral oils in a role of a liquid pressure-
transmitting medium. Pressure inside the cell was deter-
mined using the Pb pressure sensor. A decrease of pressure in
the clamped CuBe cell with decreasing temperature was
taken into account.16
Figure 1shows the temperature dependence of magneti-
zation of LaFe11.6Si1.4 under several hydrostatic pressures. In
zero pressure, the Curie temperaure TC, determined by the
inflection point in the low-field 共H=100 Oe兲M-Tcurve with
warming process, is 191 K, consistent with previous reports.
With increasing pressure, TCdecreases dramatically, from
191 K in zero pressure to 80 K in 8.3 kbar pressure. These
results verify the significant influence of pressure on the
phase transition in LaFe11.6Si1.4.
a兲Electronic mail: youngsun@aphy.iphy.ac.cn
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 89, 172513 共2006兲
0003-6951/2006/89共17兲/172513/3/$23.00 © 2006 American Institute of Physics89, 172513-1
Downloaded 27 Oct 2006 to 159.226.36.156. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jsp
We then studied the influence of pressure on the MCE in
LaFe11.6Si1.4. It is well known that the MCE can be evaluated
from the isothermal magnetization curves using a Maxwell
relation.1In order to calculate the entropy change, we mea-
sured the isothermal magnetization curves at a temperature
interval of 2.5 K in the vicinity of TCand an interval of 5 K
away from TC. Figures 2共a兲–2共c兲show the typical isothermal
magnetization curves of LaFe11.6Si1.4 under different pres-
sures. In zero pressure, a metamagnetic transition occurs at a
critical field in the paramagnetic state. The metamagnetic
transition decays with increasing temperature and the hyster-
esis eventually disappears at a temperature T0. These results
in zero pressure are similar to previous reports on
LaFe13−xSixcompounds.15 For a 4.5 kbar pressure in which
TCis reduced to 150 K, the magnetization curves become
peculiar above TC. As the field increases, the magnetization
increases slowly as expected for a paramagnetic state. Then,
a sudden jump of magnetization, evidencing a very sharp
metamagnetic transition, happens at a critical field Hc. The
amplitude of the magnetization jump, more than 100 emu / g,
is strikingly huge. With further increasing field, the magne-
tization saturates smoothly. When the field returns, the tran-
sition from the high magnetization to the low magnetization
is less sharp and occurs at a much lower field, which causes
a huge hysteresis. With increasing temperature, the critical
field increases rapidly. At 170 K, the magnetization remains
a low value until the maximum field 共5T兲, but it is expected
that the metamagnetic transition would happen at a higher
critical field. When the pressure is increased to 8.3 kbars in
which TCis reduced to 80 K, the magnetization of
LaFe11.6Si1.4 becomes more peculiar. Apparent curvature and
hysteresis in magnetization appear even below TC. At and
above TC, the magnetization exhibits very sharp jumps with
huge hysteresis. More interestingly, the magnetization under
8.3 kbars exhibits two separate transitions, one at a lower
critical field with a small magnetization jump and another at
a higher critical field with a big jump.
From Fig. 2, it is apparent that the metamagnetic transi-
tion is very sensitive to temperature. It appears immediately
at TCand the critical field shifts rapidly as temperature in-
creases. Because of the sharpness and the temperature sensi-
tivity of these metamagnetic transitions under pressure, a gi-
ant MCE would be expected, especially near TC. Figure 3
shows the calculated entropy change ⌬Susing the isothermal
magnetization curves. In zero pressure, the maximum values
of ⌬Sare about 12 and 24 J / 共kg K兲for 1 and 5 T field
variations, respectively. Under a 4.5 kbar pressure, ⌬Sshows
a giant peak at TC共150 K兲. For a small field variation of 1 T
only, the peak value of ⌬Sis as high as 34 J / 共kg K兲. This
value is strikingly high given the fact that the maximum of
⌬Sfor a 1 T field variation in typical materials showing a
giant MCE is less than 15 J/共kg K兲. However, the ⌬Sfor a
1 T field variation drops quickly to a low value when tem-
perature increases. This is due to the fact that 1 T field is not
FIG. 1. Low-field 共H= 100 Oe兲M-Tcurves of LaFe11.6Si1.4 under several
pressures.
FIG. 2. 共Color online兲Isothermal M-Hcurves of LaFe11.6Si1.4 around TC
under different pressures: 共a兲zero pressure, 共b兲4.5 kbars, and 共c兲8.3 kbars.
FIG. 3. 共Color online兲Entropy change for magnetic field changes of 1 and
5 T under several pressures in LaFe11.6Si1.4.
172513-2 Sun et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 172513 共2006兲
Downloaded 27 Oct 2006 to 159.226.36.156. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jsp
enough to cause a metamagnetic transition above TCso that
the magnetization remains a low value and the entropy
changes little as the field varies. For a 5 T field variation, the
peak value of ⌬Sreaches 38 J / 共kg K兲, a little higher than
that for a 1 T variation. Nevertheless, the shape of ⌬Sis
peculiar. After the peak at TC, a plateau of ⌬Sremains for a
broad temperature range above TC. When temperature is
higher than 167 K, ⌬Sdrops to a low value because 5 T field
is not enough to cause a metamagnetic transition above this
temperature. It is expected that the plateau of ⌬Swould last
to higher temperatures when a higher field variation 共H
⬎5T兲is applied. Under 8.3 kbar pressure, the shape of ⌬S
is similar to that in 4.5 kbars but the maximum value is more
giant, reaching 60 J/共kg K兲for a 5 T field variation.
These results for the first time demonstrate that the iso-
thermal entropy change in LaFe11.6Si1.4 can be greatly en-
hanced by pressure. Pressure enhancement of the entropy
change has recently been observed in MnAS and
Tb5Si2Ge2.11,12 It has been proposed that the enhancement of
MCE by pressure is due to the contribution from the lattice
entropy when there is strong magnetostructural coupling as-
sociated with the first-order magnetic phase transition. This
argument seems also true for LaFe11.6Si1.4 since a strong
magnetovolume effect accompanying with the first-order
metamagnetic transition in LaFe1−xSixhas been well
recognized.14 The significant enhancement of the low-field
MCE as well as the plateau shape of the high-field MCE may
have important impact on practical applications.
This work was supported by the State Key Project of
Fundamental Research and the National Natural Science
Foundation of China. The financial support from the Project
No. 202/06/0178 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic
is also acknowledged.
1V. K. Pecharsky and K. A. Gschneidner, Jr., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 200,
44 共1999兲.
2G. V. Brown, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 3673 共1976兲.
3V. K. Pecharsky and K. A. Gschneidner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4494 共1997兲.
4F. Hu, B. Shen, and J. Sun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3460 共2000兲.
5H. Wada and Y. Tanabe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3302 共2001兲.
6O. Tegus, E. Bruck, K. H. J. Buschow, and F. R. de Boer, Nature 共London兲
415, 150 共2002兲.
7Feng-Xia Hu, Bao-Gen Shen, Ji-Rong Sun, Zhao-Hua Cheng, Guang-Hui
Rao, and Xi-Xiang Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 3675 共2001兲.
8S. Fujieda, A. Fujiata, and K. Fukamichi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81,1276
共2002兲.
9Z. B. Guo, Y. W. Du, J. S. Zhu, H. Huang, W. P. Ding, and D. Feng, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 78, 1142 共1997兲.
10Young Sun, Xiaojun Xu, and Yuheng Zhang, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 219,
183 共2000兲.
11L. Morellon, Z. Arnold, C. Magen, C. Ritter, O. Prokhnenko, Y. Sko-
rokhod, P. A. Algarabel, M. R. Ibarra, and J. Kamarad, Phys. Rev. Lett.
93, 137201 共2004兲.
12Sergio Gama, Adelino A. Coelho, Ariana de Campos, A. Magnus G. Gar-
valho, Flavio C. G. Gandra, Pedro J. von Ranke, and Nilson A. de Ol-
iveira, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 237202 共2004兲.
13Young Sun, J. Kamarad, Z. Arnold, Zhi-Qi Kou, and Zhao-Hua Cheng,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 102505 共2006兲.
14A. Fujita, S. Fujieda, K. Fukamichi, H. Mitamura, and T. Goto, Phys. Rev.
B65, 014410 共2001兲.
15A. Fujita, K. Fukamichi, M. Yamada, and T. Goto, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 7263
共2003兲.
16J. Kamarad, Z. Machatova, and Z. Arnold, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75,5022
共2004兲.
172513-3 Sun et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 172513 共2006兲
Downloaded 27 Oct 2006 to 159.226.36.156. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jsp