An Example from the Sky Islands HE WILDLANDS PROJECT WAS ORGANIZED to coordinate conservation area design throughout North America, with a special focus on large carnivores and wilderness. During the last decade, we have learned a great deal about the scientific underpinnings of con-servation area design and the on-the-ground steps necessary to carry out such a design and plan. Since its first issue, Wild Earth has been home to the practical discussion of how to design con-servation areas so they are better able to protect species, ecosystems, and ecological processes. Early on, we decided we needed direct experience with conservation area design in order to learn how to do it. Only then would we feel we could help others. The Sky Islands Wildlands Network Conservation Plan is the result of that work. We have learned much from the process as well as from the scientific workshop organized by Michael Soulé and John Terborgh in 1997. The book resulting from that workshop, Continental Conservation: Scientific Foundations of Regional Reserve Networks (Soulé and Terborgh 1999), is the single most important source for understand-ing the theoretical and applied science behind conservation area design. Here, we share the dif-ferent pieces or elements that should be included in each conservation area design in the United States if it is to be comprehensive and contribute to real world conservation. Different regions of North America will emphasize certain of these elements over others, but most of these elements should be included in a thorough wildlands network proposal for any region. The Name of the Thing As science-based reserve design and conservation area plan-ning has evolved, many names have been used to describe the process and the product. Some words carry negative baggage in specific regions among certain groups with whom we would like to work. Reserve is such a word, with negative connotations for tribal groups and in Mexico. Because of this, we use conserva-tion area design for the process (Jeo et al. 1999). Since the mid-1980s, conservation area design to protect ecological values has been based on healing the fragmentation and degradation of the landscape with a complex of protected core areas, corridors, and buffer zones (Noss 1987). For this con-nected complex of protected areas, the product of the conserva-tion planning process, we use wildlands network. The word wild-lands has come to mean a range of natural and semi-natural landscapes. Network refers both to a network of conservation areas and to a network of people and communities who care about the land and are working together to protect (and use) it (Soulé 1995, 2000). A wildlands network is a proposed system of cores, linkages, and compatible use zones in an ecologically defined area, thus the Sky Islands Wildlands Network (SIWN, pronounced sigh-win). Rewilding a landscape requires more than a mapped wild-lands network, however. Reintroduction of extirpated species, ecological restoration, management guidelines, and compatible economic use standards are also necessary. When these man-agement efforts are combined with a wildlands network, a con-servation plan for the area is created. Therefore, conservation area design leads to a Wildlands Network Conservation Plan.