The impacts of the two most widespread introduced herbivores in New
Zealand (red deer and possums) were investigated to compare the relative
importance of arboreal and terrestrial browsers, and to determine the likely
relationships between pest density and their impacts. The study was conducted
between 1990 and 1993 in podocarp-hardwood forest west of Lake Taupo,
where the density, diet, and forage use of the two species was quantified and
compared with quantitative estimates of forest composition, forage availability
and production, and stem diameter and seedling height distributions. Deer
density was stable at about c. 6 deer/km2
, and annual faecal output for deer was
estimated at 14 kg (dry weight)/ha/yr. Possum density increased during the
study to reach c. 3 possums/ha in 1993, with an estimated faecal output of 44
kg/ha/yr for that year. In the forest, pepperwood (Pseudowintera colorata)
and Neomyrtus pedunculata were most abundant, but podocarps comprised
nearly half the total basal area of 73 m2
/ha. About 2.5 tonnes/ha of foliage were
produced annually, suggesting that c. 5 tonnes/ha of foliage were available to
possums. In contrast, only 288 kg/ha of forage was available within the deer
browse tier with just 9 kg/ha of that being comprised of the seven foods most
important to deer. Deer and possums ate much the same range of about 100
plant species, but there was very little overlap in the main food used by each
species. For deer, woody plants comprised 70% of the annual diet, ferns 17%,
and grasses 10%, with broadleaf (Griselinia littoralis) and lancewood
(Pseudopanax crassifolius) being the two most important foods. Most deer
forage consisted of adult tree foliage, much of it obtained as litterfall. Woody
plants also predominated (c. 80%) in possum diet, followed by herbs and ferns
(c. 5% each). Possums relied heavily on fruit at times, but the foliage of Hall’s
totara (Podocarpus hallii) was their main food. Overall, possums and deer
consumed about 88 and 30 kg of forage/ha/yr, respectively, equating to 3.3% of
total annual foliage production (AFP) for possums and just 1.1% of AFP for deer.
Possums used 16 of the 40 most common species or species groups, but ate
less than 12% of AFP for all but three of those. Deer consumed far greater
proportions of the much smaller quantities of AFP available to them and, as a
consequence, prevented regeneration for many of their preferred species. In
contrast, possums appeared to have relatively little influence on the seedling
heights (i.e., regeneration) of common species. Overall, there appeared to be
little competition for food between the species, and possum impacts were
focused on fewer woody plants than were deer impacts. Deer had a greater
impact on regeneration patterns within the browse tier than did possums on
the forest as a whole. Because neither species removed much of the total
annual foliage production, major dieback or changes in abundance of the most
common species appeared unlikely. However, most podocarps (excluding
Hall’s totara) and other unpalatable species appeared likely to increase and
many of the palatable species likely to decrease while deer and possums
remained uncontrolled. A major reduction in deer density (i.e., to <2 deer/km2
)
would be required to significantly alter present regeneration patterns. If deer
numbers remain above this level, intensive possum control would have little
6
effect on regeneration patterns, but should benefit established specimens of
Hall’s totara and other possum-preferred species not accessible to deer. These
results suggest the Department of Conservation should reassess present
priorities in possum and ungulate (deer and goat) control for vegetation
protection, giving greater consideration to the dominant influence of ungulates
on patterns of ground-level regeneration.