Content uploaded by Guillaume Lebreton
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Guillaume Lebreton on Apr 03, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Cardiopulmonary bypass model in the rat: a new minimal invasive
model with a low flow volume
†
Guillaume Lebretona,b,*, Fabienne Tamionb, Jean-Paul Bessoub,c and Fabien Doguetb,c
a
Department of Thoracic and CardioVascular Surgery, University Hospital, CHU Pierre Zobda Quitmann, Martinique, France
b
INSERM U644, University Medical School, Rouen, France
c
Department of Thoracic and CardioVascular Surgery, University Hospital, Rouen, France
* Corresponding author. Tel: +596-5-96552271; e-mail: guillaumelebreton@live.fr (G. Lebreton).
Received 16 January 2011; received in revised form 2 August 2011; accepted 5 September 2011
Abstract
Numerous cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) models in the rat have already been described, but these models often have an important
mortality and differ a lot from human clinical conditions thus making them hardly usable.
The CPB model in the rat we describe allows a femoro-femoral support CPB with a low priming volume, minimal surgical approach
and excellent peroperative survival. This CPB model in the rat allows evaluating extracorporeal circulation effects.
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary bypass •Experimental surgery •Animal model
INTRODUCTION
Numerous CPB models in the rat have already been described
[1–7] with various cannulation sites, circuits, priming volumes
(12–120 ml), products used for priming, temperature and out-
flows. Often, these models differ from human clinical conditions
thus making them hardly usable.
We here describe a model allowing a femoro-femoral support
CPB with a low priming volume, minimal surgical approach and
excellent peroperative survival.
TECHNIQUE
This CPB model was performed in Wistar male rats (450–500 g),
divided into two groups of 10 rats each (Sham group, femoral
cannulation without CPB and CPB group, femoral cannulation
with CPB). All rats were housed in individual cages and received
care in accordance with the ‘Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals’(www.nap.edu/catalog/5140.html).
Extracorporeal circulation (Fig. 1)
We use a 16 G catheter (Introcan Safety BRAUN
®
) as a venous
cannula and a 22 G one as an arterial cannula. Arterial and
venous tubings as well as the pump are in PVC (internal diam-
eter: 2.5 mm. length = 20 cm). ‘Cardiotomy’reservoir is made of
a sterile 5 ml syringe (TERUMO
®
) connected to two consecutive
3-way taps, screwed to the pump. We use an occlusive roller
pump (GAMBRO®).
The oxygenator is a ‘Micro 1’(Kewei Medical Instrument Inc,
Shenzhen, China) with a 0.05 m
2
exchange surface which has
already been the subject of several publications [5–7] validating
its oxygenation capacities. The circuit is aseptically set-up and
‘freed of air bubbles’with Gelofusine
®
at 4% (BRAUN). Circuit
priming volume is 10 ml (Gelofusine
®
4%).
Operative protocol
After anaesthesia (intra-peritoneal injection of Chlorpromazine
Chlorhydrate (2 mg/kg) and Ketamine (80 mg/kg)), a heparinized
3F catheter is introduced into the left carotid. This approach is
used as an injection access and allows for a continuous pressure
monitoring. Heparin (500 UI/kg) and pancuronium bromide
(1 mg/kg) are injected through this access.
After orotracheal intubation (Arkansas no.18 cannula), con-
tinuous mechanical ventilator support is set-up at a 75 cycles/
min rate, a 10 ml/kg circulating volume and a 100% FiO
2
outside
CPB (21% during CPB). Further to intubation, a pancuronium
bromide injection is achieved through the left carotid.
The femoral vein is cannulated with a 16G catheter, and the
artery with a 22G catheter. The rat is placed upon a hotplate
with a 30° proclive positioning to ease venous drainage.
In the CPB group, cannulae are connected to the circuit after
a 2 ml Gelofusine® filling. CPB outflow is progressively increased
to 100 ml/kg/min. Vascular filling is achieved with Gelofusine®,
in compensation for diuresis, in order to maintain a MAP ≥70
mmHg and an adequate venous drainage for CPB. Rats not sub-
jected to CPB (sham group) were monitored for 150 min after
cannulation before being sacrificed.
†
Presented at the 60th International Congress of the European Society for
Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Moscow, Russia, 20–22 May 2011.
© The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 14 (2012) 642–644 BRIEF COMMUNICATION
doi:10.1093/icvts/ivr051 Advance Access publication 17 February 2012
During the entire experiment, tensional, rhythm, thermal and
diuresis monitoring were performed (Fig. 1). Diuresis was mea-
sured with a graded collector set against the urinary meatus.
Breathing and oxygenator parameters (O
2
outflow) were adjusted
according to gasometry so as to obtain a pH = 7.35, a PaO
2
=30
KPa and a PaCO
2
= 5 KPa. Arterial gasometry monitoring was
performed 20 min after femoral canulation and then after every
breathing parameter modification and at CPB discontinuation.
Blood samples (2 ml) were collected at cannulation (T0) and
at the time of sacrifice of the rats (T1 = T0 + 150 min), and imme-
diately centrifuged at 500 × g. Plasma samples were stored at
−80°C for measurement of serum tumour necrosis factor
(TNF)-αusing an ultrasensitive kit specific for rat TNF-α
(Cytoscreen; Biosource International, USA). The assay was per-
formed by measuring optical density at 450 nm. Each sample
was measured in duplicate and compared with a known concen-
tration range of TNF-α. The limit of detection was 0.7 pg/ml.
The rats were euthanized at the end of the study.
Data analysis
All results are presented with a mean ± standard deviation.
Results were compared with the Student’st-test. A P< 0.05 value
is considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was
performed with Statview
®
computer program.
RESULTS
None of the rats died during the procedure.
Figure 1: The cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and its monitoring. 1, blood
pressure and electrocardiogram; 2, temperature; 3, diuresis; 4, CPB flow
pump.
Figure 2: Blood pressure, heart rate and TNF-αvalues during the procedure.
EXPERIMENTAL
G. Lebreton et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 643
Mean arterial pressure analysis during the experiment (Fig. 2)
reveals a higher MAP (P< 0.0001) at post-cannulation 20th,
40th and 60th min in the CPB group compared with the sham
group. Observed heart rates do not significantly vary between
the two groups. Vascular filling and diuresis are significant
(P< 0.0001) in the CPB group.
TNF-αvalues (Fig. 2) at T1 are significantly higher in the CPB
group (P< 0.0001), and above those measured at T0 for both
groups in which they are very low.
DISCUSSION
Studying inflammation process requires reduced surgical aggres-
sion, which led us to use a femoral cannulation (closed chest).
Consequently, the observed inflammatory response is induced
by the one caused by blood contact with CPB circuit. Indeed, in
human clinical evaluation, the role played by the surgical trauma
in complement activation has been well established [8]. In our
model, it was mild.
Furthermore, our model offers the advantage of a low priming
volume not requiring transfusion and without raising the issue of
venous drainage. To avoid this problem, we used rats weighing
between 450 and 500 g (larger volemia). Besides, diuresis moni-
toring enables compensating it with the inflow. Lastly, placing
the rat in a 30° proclive position 15 cm above cardiotomy reser-
voir level improves venous drainage and a stable 100 ml/kg/min
CPB output is obtained.
Since it is a circulatory assistance without cardiac arrest,
we observe increased mean pressures during extracorporeal
circulation. MAP difference after CPB is probably due to
the filling variation between the control and the CPB groups,
as well as to the returned part of circuit volume at the end of CPB.
CONCLUSION
This CPB model in the rat allows evaluating extracorporeal circu-
lation effects. It has the advantages of CPB circuit low volume,
peripheral cannulation and reduced surgical aggression together
with low mortality.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
REFERENCES
[1] Ballaux PK, Gourlay T, Ratnatunga CP, Taylor KM. A literature
review of cardiopulmonary bypass models for rats. Perfusion 1999;14:
411–7.
[2] Doguet F, Litzler PY, Tamion F, Richard V, Hellot MF, Thuillez C et al.
Changes in mesenteric vascular reactivity and inflammatory response
after cardiopulmonary bypass in a rat model. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:
2130–7; author reply 2137.
[3] Fabre O, Zegdi R, Vincentelli A, Cambillaud M, Prat A, Carpentier A et al.
A recovery model of partial cardiopulmonary bypass in the rat. Perfusion
2001;16:215–20.
[4] Cresce GD, Walpoth BH, Mugnai D, Innocente F, Rungatscher A, Luciani
GB et al. Validation of a rat model of cardiopulmonary bypass
with a new miniaturized hollow fiber oxygenator. ASAIO J 2008;54:
514–8.
[5] Shao H, Shen Y, Liu H, Dong G, Qiang J, Jing H. Simvastatin suppresses
lung inflammatory response in a rat cardiopulmonary bypass model. Ann
Thorac Surg 2007;84:2011–8.
[6] Shen Z, Wang Z, Zhang J, Jing H. Hepatic injury in a rat cardiopulmonary
bypass model. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:18–22.
[7] Huang H, Yin R, Zhu J, Feng X, Wang C, Sheng Y et al. Protective effects
of melatonin and N-acetylcysteine on hepatic injury in a rat cardiopul-
monary bypass model. J Surg Res 2007;142:153–61.
[8] Gu YJ, Mariani MA, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, van Oeveren W.
Complement activation in coronary artery bypass grafting patients
without cardiopulmonary bypass: the role of tissue injury by surgical inci-
sion. Chest 1999;116:892–8.
G. Lebreton et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery644