Caenorhabditis briggsae is a member of the 'elegans group', a monophyletic clade of seven species within Caenorhabditis (Sudhaus & Kiontke, 1996). Species iden-ti cations within this group are dif cult. C. briggsae and C. elegans can be distinguished in that they are her-maphroditic whereas other members of the elegans group are gonochoristic (Maupas, 1900; Nigon & Dougherty, 1949; Sudhaus & Kiontke, 1996). C. briggsae and C. clavopapillata can be distinguished from other elegans group members based on their patterns of caudal papillae (Kreis & Faust, 1933; Nigon & Dougherty, 1949; Fried-man et al., 1977). Despite the general utility of caudal papillae patterns as diagnostic characters, their use to discriminate between C. briggsae and C. elegans came into question when a strain of C. briggsae, PB800, was obtained that displayed an elegans pattern at a high frequency. The canonical C. briggsae arrangement of caudal papillae is a 2/4+3 pattern with the third and fourth pair frequently being fused together (Nigon & Dougherty, 1949; Fig. 1A). This pattern also was reported for a second C. briggsae strain, AF16 (Fodor et al., 1983). The C. briggsae arrangement differs from those of C. elegans and C. remanei which have a 2+(1)+3+3 pattern (Maupas, 1900; Sudhaus, 1974; Baird et al., 1994; Fig. 1B, C). Immediately after its establishment, 70% of PB800 males displayed an elegans pattern on both sides. With subsequent inbreeding, this frequency decreased but still remained relatively high (see below). To address their use as diagnostic characters, caudal papillae patterns of AF16, PB800 and three additional C. briggsae strains, HK104, HK105, and VT847, were determined by microscopic observations using differential interference contrast optics (magni cation 400£). These strains were established from collections at disparate lo- cations and should each represent a genetically distinct population (Table 1). Identi cations of PB800, HK104, HK105, and VT847 as C. briggsae were con rmed by mating tests with AF16 (data not shown). These tests were scored as positive if the frequency of males approached 50% in the F1 generation. In the absence of mating, male frequencies resulting from self-fertilisation are less than 1% (Nigon & Dougherty, 1949). For PB800, additional mating tests with AF16 were conducted with sperm-depleted hermaphrodites (Baird et al., 1992). These mat-ing tests were scored as positive if any F1 progeny were obtained. Among and within the C. briggsae strains AF16, PB800, HK104, HK105 and VT847, considerable varia-tion in caudal papillae pattern was observed (Figs 1, 2). In AF16 and VT847, 2/4+3 patterns predominated with more than 85% of males exhibiting this briggsae pattern on both sides. (Expression of caudal papillae patterns on left and right sides was independent, hence the frequency of males exhibiting a single pattern on both sides was equal to the square of the overall frequency of that pattern.) In PB800, HK104, and HK105, frequencies of 2/4+3 and 2+(1)+3+3 patterns were approximately equal. In these strains, ap-proximately 25% of males exhibited a briggsae pattern on both sides and approximately 25% an elegans pattern on both sides. Among the observed 2/4+3 patterns, the frequency with which caudal papillae 3 and 4 were fused also varied from strain to strain. This variation was corre-lated with the overall frequency of 2/4+3 patterns; fusions of caudal papillae 3 and 4 were most frequent in AF16 and VT847 and least frequent in PB800, HK104, and HK105. Other patterns also were observed at lower frequencies in PB800 and HK105. These included a 2+(2)+2+3 pat-tern, a 'sixless' pattern in which caudal papillae assumed a cylindrical morphology and was displaced anteriorly (see c ° Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2001 373