Three smallholder villages located in typical communal (from 1948), old (1987) and new
(2002) resettlement areas, on loamy sand, sandy loam and clay soils, respectively, were
selected to explore differences on natural resource management and land productivity. Focus
group discussions and surveys were carried out with farmers. Additionally, farmers in three
wealth classes per village were chosen for a detailed assessment of their main production
systems. Maize grain yields (t ha-1) in the communal (1.5-4.0) and new resettlement areas
(1.9-4.3) were similar but significantly higher than in the old resettlement area (0.9-2.7),
despite lower soil quality in the communal area. Nutrient input use was the main factor
controlling maize productivity in the three areas (R2=59-83%), while soil quality accounted
for up to 12%. Partial N balances (kg ha-1 yr-1) were significantly lower in the new
resettlement (-9.1 to +14.3) and old resettlement (+7.4 to +9.6) than in the communal area
(+2.1 to +59.6) due to lower nutrient applications. Averaged P balances were usually
negative. Consistently, maize yields, nutrient applications and partial N balances were higher
in the high wealth class than in poorer classes. This study found that most farmers in the new
resettlement area were exploiting the inherent soil nutrient stocks more than farmers in the
other two areas. We argue that effective policies supporting an efficient fertilizer distribution
and improved soil management practices, with clearer rights to land, are necessary to avoid
future land degradation and to improve food security in Zimbabwe, particularly in the
resettlement areas.