As an ecological process fire plays a global role in structuring ecosystems and their constituent fauna and flora. Fire is also regularly applied as a landscape management tool and altered fire regimes affect global biodiversity. Fire can have a marked influence on vegetation composition and structure with resultant flow on impacts on faunal communities. However, faunal responses to fire are often quite varied and management recommendations of appropriate fire regimes therefore generally include utilising a fire mosaic approach to fire management. This thesis investigates the relationship between variable fire regimes, vegetation composition, condition and structure, and ground-dwelling vertebrate faunal communities.
The literature review (Chapter 1) revealed several gaps in current knowledge. This included a lack of detailed knowledge on the effects of variable fire regimes, including repeated management burns and fire mosaics, representative of multiple fire parameters (time since fire, number of fires, fire interval and fire type), on ecosystem biota. This was particularly evident for subtropical ecosystems. To analyse the effects of repeated burns, fire exclusion and wildfire, this study targeted one of the longest running fire experiments in Australia, at Bauple State Forest, where fire treatments have been applied annually since 1952 and triennially since 1973. Additional dry eucalypt forest sites at St Mary and Tiaro State Forests were included that represented variable fire management practices. Detailed fauna trapping surveys and vegetation assessments were completed on 35 plots across eight fire treatments at all three sites. Additionally, a broader scale GIS analysis of fire history was done across the three forests with surveys undertaken at an additional 74 sites allowing a comparison of reptile communities, forest condition and structure among variable fire regimes at multiple scales.
To quantify the structural and compositional influences that fire has on vegetation communities in subtropical systems, Chapter 3 involved a detailed analysis of the communities within the three dry eucalypt forests. Fire treatments significantly altered vegetation community diversity, structure and composition. Annual burning resulted in reduced floral diversity among all strata and reduced structural heterogeneity in the ground and shrub layers. Long unburned areas were more diverse but had lower canopy heterogeneity. Wildfires did not significantly impact the vegetation community.Consistent with previous research, this chapter found that frequent, repeated burning can reduce the diversity and structural complexity of forests.
The effects of disturbance (fire and logging) on forest condition and forest variables across the landscape were investigated in Chapter 4 using a biodiversity condition assessment toolkit among 63 plots. Forest variables and overall condition were correlated with historical disturbance patterns, derived from GIS, among Regional Ecosystems (RE), including time since fire, number of fires, fire interval, fire type and years since logging. The majority of forest variables were negatively affected by more frequent (61.5% of variables), or recent fire disturbances (76.9% of variables). The most pronounced negative impacts occurred for tree species richness, and two key habitat attributes for fauna including coarse woody debris and litter cover, which were maximised in long unburned areas highlighting the importance of maintaining long unburned refuges in the landscape.
Chapter 5 investigated the response of reptile and anuran communities, surveyed at 35 trapping plots, to different fire regimes and habitat characteristics quantified in Chapter 3. Reptiles were more vulnerable to fire impacts than anurans, particularly frequent fires (annual burning) which reduced the abundance of several species; however, species were generally not affected by wildfire. Species such as Lampropholis delicata and Eulamprus martini favoured long unburned areas, however, other species, i.e. Carlia p. pectoralis, preferred frequently and recently burned sites. Anurans, on the other hand appeared to be resilient to fires, corroborating previous studies on this taxon as they are able to retreat into moist microhabitats to survive. The ‘risk’ and ‘impact’ of fires to individual species was interpreted using a conceptual model that was able to categorise species as either tolerant or resilient to fire. These species-specific responses are important considerations when planning fire management guidelines that advocate frequent burning, as some species may be negatively affected.
In a parallel analysis, Chapter 6 assessed small mammal communities across the three sites and their response to variable fire regimes and habitat parameters. Mammals generally were not strongly influenced by fire but had highly variable responses which made it difficult to determine the factors influencing either species richness or abundance. It therefore appears likely that small mammal communities are not being negatively affected by repeated burning practices or infrequent wildfire. However, species were often correlated with habitat heterogeneity characteristics, highlighting the importance of maintaining a structurally diverse habitat that supports a variety of mammal species. As such, the indirect effects of fires may lead to a reduction in ideal habitat for certain mammals.
In Chapter 7, reptile communities were assessed across the landscape and correlated with various fire parameters and forest variables from Chapter 4. Number of fires, time since fire and fire type were key predictors for overall reptile abundance, as well as the abundance of four of the seven common study species. Overall abundance was negatively affected by number of fires and it also altered the overall reptile assemblage, while at a species level Carlia spp. were negatively associated with time since fire. Fire was generally a stronger predictor of reptile responses than habitat parameters with only shrub cover found to be negatively associated with Carlia spp. A reduction in total number of fires of some areas and increase in variability of burn intervals may support a greater diversity and abundance of reptiles in parts of the landscape where the total number of fires is high.
Fire heterogeneity was quantified within fire regimes across multiple scales in Chapter 8, using the variation in time since fire, number of fires, fire interval and unique (combination) fire mosaic regimes derived from GIS. Heterogeneity at the patch, local and site scales calculated from the Shannon-Wiener diversity index was weakly correlated with reptile communities and the heterogeneity measures appeared to be a poor surrogate of ‘fire diversity’. While this heterogeneity measure could not explain patterns in reptile communities, it is important to note that it captures only one element of landscape ‘pyrodiversity’. As other fire parameters including fire type revealed significant responses amongst reptiles, the specific nature of any biodiversity response to pyrodiversity appears linked to both scale and specific parameters used.
This thesis has demonstrated that aspects of the vegetation community as well as faunal species, favoured different fire regimes, where some species and structural characteristics preferred frequently burned areas while others (although more often than not) preferred infrequently burned or long unburned areas. Support is provided for the suggestion that a mix of frequently burned, infrequently burned and long unburned areas across the landscape will maximise floral and faunal communities, and help meet management goals of maintaining biodiversity. However, the scale of these unburned refuges is an important question that requires more research.