ArticlePDF Available

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant for Multiple Myeloma

Authors:
1997 89: 2610
N. H. Russell, G. Miflin, C. Stainer, J. G. Mc Quaker, N. Bienz, A. P. Haynes and E. M. Bessell
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant for Multiple Myeloma
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/89/7/2610.full.html
Updated information and services can be found at:
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#repub_requests
Information about reproducing this article in parts or in its entirety may be found online at:
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/misc/rights.xhtml#reprints
Information about ordering reprints may be found online at:
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/site/subscriptions/index.xhtml
Information about subscriptions and ASH membership may be found online at:
Copyright 2011 by The American Society of Hematology; all rights reserved.
20036.
the American Society of Hematology, 2021 L St, NW, Suite 900, Washington DC
Blood (print ISSN 0006-4971, online ISSN 1528-0020), is published weekly by
For personal use only. by guest on July 14, 2011. bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.orgFrom
CORRESPONDENCE
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant for Multiple Myeloma
To the Editor: in CR from influenza A pneumonitis at 5 months posttransplant and
1 patient, who failed to achieve a CR posttransplant, eventually died
from progressive disease. This patient was transplanted 32 months
In a detailed analysis of 80 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) from diagnosis and had received 2 previous chemotherapy regimens.
undergoing allogeneic bone marrow tranplantation Bensinger et al
1
She was also the only patient to receive cyclophosphamide and TBI
concluded that future studies of this treatment modality in MM conditioning therapy.
should focus on the use of less toxic conditioning regimens applied From these results we would suggest that fractionated TBI and
earlier in the course of the disease. We would support these conclu- melphalan is a well tolerated conditioning regimen for patients with
sions based on our own analysis of a smaller group of 13 patients MM. The dose of melphalan used in our series (110 mg/m
2
) is lower
undergoing allogeneic transplantation in Nottingham since 1990. than is conventionally used with TBI in autologous PBSCT for MM
Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. As can be seen, the (140 mg/m
2
).
2
This lower dose melphalan was chosen in an attempt
majority of patients were tranplanted early in their disease, 6 patients to reduce regimen related toxicity and to minimize mortality in a
in first response and 7 in second response. The median time to predominantly older group of patients with a disease characterized
tranplantation was 19 months and of the 6 patients transplanted in by a high transplant related mortality (TRM).
3
The high rate of CR
first response, all were transplanted within 18 months of diagnosis. (10 out of 11 patients) and relatively low probability of day 100
The first patient received conditioning with fractionated total body nonrelapse mortality (15%) compared to other studies
1,3
would sug-
irradiation (TBI) (12 Gy in 6 fractions) and cyclophosphamide (120 gest that this is an effective and relatively nontoxic antimyeloma
mg/kg), with all subsequent patients receiving fractionated TBI and conditioning regimen. The group of patients reported here were gen-
melphalan (110 mg/m
2
). In addition, in the week before admission, erally transplanted earlier in their disease than the patients reported
patients received additional top up radiotherapy to sites of major by Bensinger et al
1
and no patient had received more than 2 lines
bone disease if evident on skeletal survey. All patients received of conventional therapy before proceeding to transplant. Thus the
cyclosporin and a short course of methotrexate (15 mg/m
2
on day high response rate, low relapse rate, and low TRM may also reflect
/
1 and 10 mg/m
2
on day
/
3,
/
6, and
/
11) for prevention of graft- this. The EBMT experience has also shown that patients transplanted
versus-host disease (GVHD). Twelve patients were transplanted following just 1 line of chemotherapy have a superior CR rate and
from HLA-identical sibling donors; however, 1 patient in second overall survival compared with patients transplanted with more ad-
response was transplanted from a 1 HLA-B mismatched sister. vanced disease.
4
Finally, the results reported here and elsewhere,
1,3
Twelve patients received bone marrow (BM) and 1 patient was which suggest that some patients with MM undergoing allogeneic
transplanted with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized bone marrow transplant may be cured of their disease, means that
peripheral blood stem cells. Of the 13 patients transplanted 11 were we continue to evaluate allogeneic transplantation in preference to
evaluable posttranplant of whom 10 achieved a complete remission autologous PBSCT for all newly diagnosed MM patients
õ
50 years
(CR) defined as a normal BM aspirate and trephine biopsy with with poor prognostic features who have a fully matched sibling
a complete absence of monoclonal protein in blood or urine by donor.
immunofixation. No patient has relapsed and currently 9 are surviv-
ing, disease-free, ranging from 7 to 70 months posttransplant. Of
the 6 patients tranplanted in first response, all within 18 months of
diagnosis, 5 are in CR. The overall disease-free survival for all
patients transplanted is shown in Fig 1. Four patients have died, 3
from transplant related causes. Of these, 2 patients died before day
100, 1 from acute GVHD (grade IV), and 1 from multiorgan failure;
both patients were transplanted in second response. No other patient
developed more than grade I acute GVHD. One further patient died
Table 1. Patient Characteristics (n Å13)
Median age (range) at transplantation 49 yr (44-47)
Sex (M:F) 6:7
Stage at diagnosis
I1
II 3*
III 9†
No. of previous lines of treatment
16
27
Median time (range) from diagnosis to transplant 19 mo (5-53)
* One patient had systemic amyloidosis complicating myeloma.
Fig 1. Event-free survival of 13 patients transplanted with MM.
One patient had plasma cell leukemia with a peripheral blood
plasma cell count of 72 110
9
/L at presentation.
2610
Blood,
Vol 89, No 7 (April 1), 1997: pp 2610-2617
AID Blood 0053 / 5h31$$1041 03-10-97 15:40:46 bldas WBS: Blood
For personal use only. by guest on July 14, 2011. bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.orgFrom
CORRESPONDENCE 2611
N. H. Russell bone marrow transplantation for multiple myeloma. An analysis of
risk factors on outcome. Blood 88:2787, 1996
G. Miflin 2. Jagannath S, Barlogie B, Dicke K, Alexanian R, Zagars G,
C. Stainer Cheson B, Lemaistre FC, Smallwood L, Pruitt K, Dixon DO: Autolo-
J. G. M
C
Quaker gous bone marrow transplantation in multiple myeloma: Identifica-
N. Bienz tion of prognostic factors. Blood 76:1860, 1990
A. P. Haynes 3. Gahton G, Ture S, Ljungman P, Belanger C, Brandt L, Cavo
E. M. Bessell M, Facon T, Granena A, Gratwohl A, Lowenberg B, Nikoskelainen
Department of Haematology and J, Reiffers J, Samson D, Selby P, Volin L: for the European Group
Department of Clinical Oncology for Blood and Marrow Transplantation: Allogeneic bone marrow
Nottingham City Hospital transplantation in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 325:1267, 1991
Nottingham, UK 4. Gahrton G, Ture S, Ljungman P, Blade J, Brandt L, Cavo M,
Facon T, Gratwohl A, Hagenbeek A, Jacobs P, De Laurenzi A, Van
REFERENCES
Lint M, Michallet N, Nikoskelainen J, Reiffers J, Samson D, Verdonck
1. Bensinger WI, Buckner CD, Anasetti C, Clift R, Storb R, L, De Witt T, Volin L: Prognostic factors in allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 13:1312, 1995Barnett T, Chauncey T, Shulman H, Appelbaum FR: Allogeneic
Can Ferritin Provide Iron for Hemoglobin Synthesis?
To the Editor: of erythroid cells on Tf-bound Fe. Interestingly, in 1962 Bessis and
Breton-Gorius themselves reviewed critically their original hypothe-
We have read with great interest a recent report by Gelvan et al
1
sis, and did not exclude the possibility that the phenomenon of
attempting to resurrect an old idea that immature erythroid cells ‘‘rhopheocytosis’’ takes place in the opposite direction, ie, ‘‘the
obtain iron (Fe) from ferritin. We wish to comment on one single and erythroblast imparts the ferritin to the reticular cell.’’
14
extremely important issue in this report, viz, that Fe from internalized Ferritin is not only an improbable source of Fe for the erythroid
ferritin can be used for hemoglobin synthesis. We believe that neither cells, but it is also an unlikely mediator involved in intracellular
the results of previous studies nor experiments presented by Gelvan translocation of Fe for heme synthesis. Although ferritin has been
et al
1
provide adequate evidence supporting this claim. postulated to act as an intermediate for heme synthesis in erythroid
In 1957 Bessis and Breton-Gorius
2
presented electron micrographs cells,
15,16
several studies failed to show that
59
Fe from
59
Fe-ferritin
depicting erythroblastic islands in the bone marrow, in which a could be incorporated into hemoglobin.
17,18
When heme synthesis
central reticulum cell (‘‘nurse cell’’) was surrounded by a ring of was inhibited in erythroid cells incubated with
59
Fe-transferrin, very
erythroblasts. In the region of contact between these cells the authors little
19,20
or no
21 59
Fe accumulates in ferritin. More importantly, when
observed ferritin and proposed that it was transferred from the reticu- heme synthesis is restored in these cells, no
59
Fe in ferritin was used
lum cell to the erythroblasts by a form of micropinocytosis termed for heme synthesis.
20
These findings concur with observations that
‘‘rhopheocytosis’’ (for review see ref 3). Somewhat later, Jandl, the intracellular Fe release from ferritin may require its catabolism,
22
Katz, and coworkers
4,5
showed that immature erythroid cells take and suggests limited availability of ferritin Fe for metabolic pur-
up Fe from plasma Fe-binding protein, transferrin (Tf), and sug- poses.
gested the existence of a membrane-bound Tf receptor which may The evidence from previous studies showing that Tf and not ferri-
be involved in Fe uptake. The many studies and discussions that tin is the Fe donor for hemoglobin synthesis must now be considered
followed have led to a general consensus that Tf, not ferritin, is with the recent investigation by Gelvan et al.
1
In this latter study
the source of Fe for hemoglobin synthesis, and this view has been the authors have incubated erythroid precursors with
59
Fe-labeled
supported by the following evidence. First, under normal conditions ferritin for 21 hours, at which time they detected some
59
Fe in the
all plasma Fe is associated with Tf, and ferrokinetic studies have cells and in heme. Unfortunately, a number of technical flaws prevent
provided clear evidence that all Fe used for hemoglobin synthesis the conclusion that
59
Fe found in heme comes from
59
Fe in the
passes through the plasma.
6
Hence, if the reticulum cell ferritin was ferritin core. To prepare
59
Fe-labeled ferritin, Gelvan and associates
the source of hemoglobin Fe, these cells would have to acquire it have exposed apoferritin to a mixture of 5%
59
Fe(III) (as
59
FeCl
3
)
from Tf. However, virtually no Fe enters the reticuloendothelial and 95%
56
Fe(II) in an oxygenated buffer at pH 7.0. It is essential
system from plasma Tf.
7
Second, it should also be pointed out that to point out that apoferritin shells can be loaded with Fe(II), whereas
plasma ferritin has a very low Fe content, and no ferrokinetic evi- attempts to load Fe(III) into the core have failed.
23
In their study,
dence supports its role in Fe transport.
7
Third, a specific relationship Gelvan et al probably presumed that
59
Fe(III), in the presence of a
between Tf and erythroid cells is documented by in vitro studies large excess of unlabeled Fe(II), would be converted to
59
Fe(II).
showing that this molecule is the only physiologically relevant Fe However, in the absence of Fe-binding ligands such a conversion
complex capable of providing Fe for hemoglobin synthesis.
8
Fourth, has been shown to occur only at an extremely low pH (
õ
1.0, ref
normally developing erythroid cells take up 26 mg Fe/d from plasma 24). From method description
1
it is not apparent what ligand was
Tf,
7
a rate that matches almost perfectly with the daily production present in the MOPS buffer that would stabilize both Fe(II) and
of hemoglobin (
Ç
6.2 g). The final and most convincing evidence Fe(III) in aqueous solution at pH 7.0 to allow electron self-exchange
of an absolute requirement for Tf by erythroid cells comes from between the two redox states of Fe to occur. MOPS buffers are
observations that both humans and mice with hereditary atransferri- sometimes supplemented with EDTA (although this is not specified
nemia have severe hypochromic microcytic anemias.
9-11
Further- in ref 1) which, however, has almost 11 orders of magnitude higher
more, when compared with wild-type animals, hypotransferrinemic formation constant for Fe(III) than for Fe(II).
25
Hence, under aerobic
mice show an extremely restricted uptake of
59
Fe by the erythron.
12,13
conditions the Fe(II)-EDTA complex should be rapidly oxidized to
Fe(III)-EDTA complex, but no reduction of
59
Fe(III)-EDTA wouldCollectively, the above studies document the stringent dependency
AID Blood 0053 / 5h31$$1041 03-10-97 15:40:46 bldas WBS: Blood
For personal use only. by guest on July 14, 2011. bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.orgFrom
Chapter
Immunotherapy has been adopted into standard of care for myeloma, while novel approaches in development appear promising and may change the future landscape. Antibody therapy targets myeloma-associated antigens to enhance innate immunity via cell-mediated and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and elotuzumab have demonstrated efficacy in combination with several agents in relapsed disease while checkpoint inhibitors were associated with excessive toxicity. The addition of daratumumab to up-front therapy is being investigated with results to date demonstrating deeper responses with potential to translate into more durable initial response. In the most heavily pretreated patients, use of cellular therapies such as BCMA CAR T cells has demonstrated impressive responses albeit with risk of CRS and CRES. Durability of engineered T-cell therapies remains unknown with relapses occurring due to tumor escape by antigen downregulation and development of T-cell anergy. Antibody drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies can provide more precise delivery of cytotoxic agents or approximation of tumor and effector cells. Myeloma vaccines can induce the expansion of cytotoxic T cells that target tumor-specific antigens with minimal toxicity. Use of vaccines post-stem cell transplant is in late-phase testing and is a novel strategy to induce a memory response. The success of immunotherapy in myeloma relies on reversal of immune dysregulation leading to enhanced myeloma-specific effector cell responses. While curative therapies largely remain elusive, knowing the optimal combination strategies and the ideal time points to employ immunotherapy such as minimal residual disease after induction holds promise for long-term disease eradication.
Article
Cellular immunotherapy for myeloma has the unique potential both to potently kill the malignant clone and to evoke a memory response to protect from relapse. Understanding the complex interactions between the malignant clone and the microenvironment that promote immune escape is critical to evoke effective antimyeloma immunity. Tremendous progress has been made in the area of cancer vaccines and adoptive T-cell therapy in recent years. Careful study of the mechanisms of response and of immune escape will be critical to developing novel combination therapies and ultimately to improve outcomes for patients with myeloma.
Chapter
Although high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation confer a survival benefit in multiple myeloma [1,2], eventual disease progression is almost universal and few patients are cured [1-3]. Disease recurrence rates after purged autografts do not appear to be different from those seen with unpurged grafts [4], and relapse rates after syngeneic transplantation are also high [5,6]. This situation is unlike that in hematological malignancies such as the acute leukemias and the lymphomas, where a number of patients are cured with autologous or syngeneic transplantation [7], suggesting that currently available conditioning regimens alone are incapable of eradicating myeloma. Although relapse rates are high after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in myeloma [8-10], some patients do attain sustained molecular remissions [11] and become long-term disease-free survivors [8-10,12,13]. This suggests that an immunological graft-versus-tumor effect similar to the well-characterized graft-versus-leukemia [GVL] reactions [14] operates in the setting of allogeneic transplantation for myeloma.
Chapter
Multiple myeloma is a disorder characterized by the neoplastic proliferation of a single clone of plasma cells. The annual incidence of multiple myeloma in the United States is approx 4 per 100,000 (1). Approximately 14,400 new cases will be diagnosed in the year 2001 in the United States with 11,200 deaths attributable to multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma represents slightly over 1% of all malignancies and 13% of all hematologic malignancies. It is predominantly a disease of older people with a median age at diagnosis of 66 yr However, approx 80% of patients are under the age of 70 and 18% are less than 50 yr of age (2).
Chapter
Allogeneic transplantation has proved to be the treatment of choice for many hematologic malignancies in patients younger than 50 to 55 yr. Randomized studies and studies based on the availability of a compatible donor have shown that allogeneic transplantation is superior to both autologous transplantation and conventional chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia during the first remission (1). Cures have apparently been obtained in approx 50 to 60% of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia, a disease that so far has not been curable using any other treatment modalities (2,3). Subgroups of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (4,5), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (6,7), myelodysplastic syndrome (8,9), and myelofibrosis (10) are also candidates for allogeneic transplantation.
Chapter
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation became an established method for treatment of hematological malignancies in the early 1970s.1, 2 The rationale for allogeneic transplantation is firstly that the bone marrow ablative therapy may have the potential to eradicate the malignant disease. The patient is thereafter saved from the consequences of ablating the marrow by infusion of normal cells from a donor. Secondly, the donor cells per se have a graft-versus-tumor effect.3,4 The exact nature of this effect is not known. However, it is well documented for chronic myelocytic leukemia,4,5 acute leukemia,4,5 and multiple myeloma.6-8 The graft-versus-tumor effect may be different from, but is associated with, graft-versus-host disease.
Article
In this case report we present a 35-year-old male patient with IgA multiple myeloma. The patient was treated with standard as well as high-dose chemotherapy including autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation with subsequent donor lymphocyte infusion. Unfortunately all treatment modalities showed only transient effect. Short time after each therapy schedule was completed, symptoms of active disease with severe bone pain reappeared. After ineffective double donor lymphocyte infusion therapy with thalidomide and dexamethasone was instituted. It resulted in dramatic clinical improvement with increase of hemoglobin concentration and decrease of monoclonal protein and plasma cell percentage in the marrow. However 48 weeks after initiation of thalidomide, symptoms of active myeloma started to reappear. The patient expired of pneumonia, 76 weeks after initiation of thalidomide, due to advanced and progressive disease. Nevertheless in this patient's case thalidomide was the most effective therapeutic agent of all known treatment modalities.
Article
The advent of biologic-based therapies for multiple myeloma has resulted in improved patient outcomes over the last decade. However, curative outcomes remain elusive. There has been an increased appreciation of the critical role host immunity plays in the evolution of disease and the potential therapeutic efficacy of immune-based therapies. These treatment approaches hold the potential promise of selective targeting of the malignant clone, disruption of stromal-plasma cell interactions, and generation of sustained antitumor immunity and durable response. However, the development of clinically efficacious immunotherapy is dependent on achieving greater understanding of the complex interactions between the immunologic milieu and disease. A number of antigens have been identified on malignant plasma cell that may be targeted by both humoral and cell-mediated immunotherapeutic strategies, and encouraging results have been demonstrated both preclinically and in clinical trials. In this chapter we summarize the immunotherapeutic strategies for multiple myeloma together with the most up-to-date clinical trial outcomes.
Article
Multiple myeloma remains a universally fatal malignancy with a median survival time not exceeding 3 years. A clinical trial was undertaken to determine feasibility and efficacy of marrow-ablative chemoradiotherapy supported by unpurged autologous bone marrow (ABMT) and to define prognostic variables. Total body irradiation and either melphalan or thiotepa were administered to 55 patients (median age 53 years; range 20 to 66 years). The group of 21 patients with resistance to standard melphalan-prednisone and to continuous infusions of vincristine and Adriamycin with high dose dexamethasone (VAD) included 7 with primary unresponsive disease and 14 with resistant relapse; among the 34 patients achieving remission with the VAD regimen, 14 were in first and 20 in a subsequent remission. Marked cytoreduction by greater than or equal to 75% was observed among all 21 patients with refractory myeloma, whereas further cytoreduction of this magnitude was noted in only 56% of the 34 patients already in remission after VAD. Five of the 6 early deaths among all 55 patients occurred in the 14 patients with resistant relapse, none of whom achieved complete remission and who, as a group, had median durations of relapse-free and overall survival of only 8 and 7 months, respectively. Among the 41 remaining patients, there was only one early death, and 27% achieved complete remission including a 36% incidence among the 14 patients treated in first remission; their projected 4-year survival rate was 82% regardless of their disease status (first or later remission or primary resistance). When information about sensitivity to prior therapy is unavailable, the presence before ABMT of both high beta-2-microglobulin levels (greater than 3 mg/L) and non-IgG isotype helped identify 9 among the 55 patients with a very poor prognosis: all 8 responders relapsed within 9 months, and 8 patients died within 15 months. By contrast, a 4-year projected survival rate of over 70% for the other patients (about 80% of this series) justifies further investigation of this novel treatment approach in comparison with standard dose regimens. Our results indicate that marrow-ablative therapy cannot be recommended for myeloma patients with resistant relapse or those with a combination of risk factors (advanced tumor burden, absence of IgG isotype). The apparent lack of an adverse effect of even marked plasmacytosis in autografts (up to 30%) emphasizes the need for better cytoreduction rather than bone marrow purging.
Article
Multiple myeloma remains a universally fatal malignancy with a median survival time not exceeding 3 years. A clinical trial was undertaken to determine feasibility and efficacy of marrow-ablative chemoradiotherapy supported by unpurged autologous bone marrow (ABMT) and to define prognostic variables. Total body irradiation and either melphalan or thiotepa were administered to 55 patients (median age 53 years; range 20 to 66 years). The group of 21 patients with resistance to standard melphalan-prednisone and to continuous infusions of vincristine and Adriamycin with high dose dexamethasone (VAD) included 7 with primary unresponsive disease and 14 with resistant relapse; among the 34 patients achieving remission with the VAD regimen, 14 were in first and 20 in a subsequent remission. Marked cytoreduction by greater than or equal to 75% was observed among all 21 patients with refractory myeloma, whereas further cytoreduction of this magnitude was noted in only 56% of the 34 patients already in remission after VAD. Five of the 6 early deaths among all 55 patients occurred in the 14 patients with resistant relapse, none of whom achieved complete remission and who, as a group, had median durations of relapse-free and overall survival of only 8 and 7 months, respectively. Among the 41 remaining patients, there was only one early death, and 27% achieved complete remission including a 36% incidence among the 14 patients treated in first remission; their projected 4-year survival rate was 82% regardless of their disease status (first or later remission or primary resistance). When information about sensitivity to prior therapy is unavailable, the presence before ABMT of both high beta-2-microglobulin levels (greater than 3 mg/L) and non-IgG isotype helped identify 9 among the 55 patients with a very poor prognosis: all 8 responders relapsed within 9 months, and 8 patients died within 15 months. By contrast, a 4-year projected survival rate of over 70% for the other patients (about 80% of this series) justifies further investigation of this novel treatment approach in comparison with standard dose regimens. Our results indicate that marrow-ablative therapy cannot be recommended for myeloma patients with resistant relapse or those with a combination of risk factors (advanced tumor burden, absence of IgG isotype). The apparent lack of an adverse effect of even marked plasmacytosis in autografts (up to 30%) emphasizes the need for better cytoreduction rather than bone marrow purging.
Article
To analyze prognostic factors for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in multiple myeloma. One hundred sixty-two reports of allogeneic matched sibling-donor transplants in multiple myeloma received by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry between 1983 and early 1993 were analyzed for prognostic factors. End points were complete remission, survival, and duration of complete remission. Following BMT, 44% of all patients and 60% of assessable patients entered complete remission. The overall actuarial survival rate was 32% at 4 years and 28% at 7 years. The overall relapse-free survival rate of 72 patients who were in complete remission after BMT was 34% at 6 years. Favorable pretransplant prognostic factors for survival were female sex (41% at 4 years), stage I disease at diagnosis (52% at 4 years), one line of previous treatment (42% at 4 years), and being in complete remission before conditioning (64% at 3 years). The subtype immunoglobulin A (IgA) myeloma and a low beta 2-microglobulin level (< 4 g/L) also tended to have a favorable prognostic impact. The most important post-transplant prognostic factor was to enter a complete remission. Grade III to IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was associated with poor survival. Patients with a low tumor burden who respond to treatment before BMT and are transplanted after first-line therapy have the best prognosis following BMT.
Article
Between September 1987 and December 1994, 80 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) received high-dose busulfan and cyclophosphamide without (n = 57) or with modified total body irradiation (n = 23) followed by marrow from allogeneic donors. At transplant, 71% of the patients had disease that was refractory to chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients died of transplant-related causes within 100 days and 11 deaths occurred later. The actuarial probabilities of survival and progression-free survival were .24 +/- 0.17 and .20 +/- 0.10 at 4.5 years. Complete remissions were obtained in 36% of patients who had actuarial probabilities of survival and event-free survival of .50 +/- 0.21 and .43 +/- 0.17 at 4.5 years. In a multivariate analysis, adverse risk factors for outcome endpoints included: transplantation greater than 1 year from diagnosis; beta-2 microglobulin > 2.5 at transplant; female patients transplanted from male donors; patients who had received greater than eight cycles of chemotherapy before transplant and Durie stage 3 disease at the time of transplant. These results indicate that allografting for patients with MM can result in long-term disease-free survival for a minority of patients. Efforts to reduce transplant-related mortality should focus on earlier transplantation, less toxic treatment regimens, better supportive care, and improved prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).