Content uploaded by Martin Breitenseher
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Martin Breitenseher
Content may be subject to copyright.
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Localization of the mandibular neurovascular bundle using dental
magnetic resonance imaging
C Nas
Ï
el
1
, A Gahleitner
1
, M Breitenseher
1
, C Czerny
1
, C Glaser
2
, P Solar
3
and H Imhof
1
1
Department of Radiology, University of Vienna;
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Vienna;
3
Department
of Oral Surgery, University of Vienna, Wa
È
hringergu
È
rtel, Austria
Objective: To assess the reliabilty of a commercially available 3D-MPR MRI program for the
jaws for imaging the mandibular neurovascular bundle.
Methods: A gradient echo sequence (TR: 49 ms/TE: 6.3 ms/¯ip angle: 258/excitations: 3)
with a spectral fat suppression pre-impulse and a voxel size of 0.960.960.8 mm was
designed. Cross-sectional and panoramic reconstruction of the whole mandible were
performed from the axial scans using Easy Vision (Philips, Best, The Netherlands) software
package. The ability to dierentiate the mandibular neu rovascular bundle was assessed in 11
patients.
Results: The mandibular neurovascular bundle was clearly visualized in all cases.
Conclusion: Dental MRI is a possible alternative to plain ®lms or CT for patients requiring
surgery near the mandibular canal.
Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging; mandibular nerve; mandible; image processing,
computer-assisted
Introduction
Location of the mandibular canal is crucial for certain
surgical pro cedures to avoid injury to the neurovas-
cular bundle. Plain ®lm radiography and CT are
currently used to demonstrate the bony margins of the
mandibular canal,
1,2,3
but in some cases they cannot be
suciently dierentiated. MRI has been shown to
demonstrate the contents of the mandibular canal
directly.
4,5
A high resolution gradient echo sequence,
designed for dental imaging and showing good
contrast between the mandibular neurovascular
bundle and the surrounding tissues was designed by
the authors. The axial slices from this sequence are
accessible on a workstation with commercially
available dental imaging software which gives images
comparable to those obtained with other 3D-MPR
programs available for den tal CT. The aim of this
paper is to report the validity of this MR procedure
for the assessment of the mandibular neurovascular
bundle.
Materials and methods
A 1T MR-scanner (Gyroscan 10 T NT, Philips, Best,
The Netherlands) was used with a standard neck-quad
coil. The whole mandible was examined in a single
gradient echo sequence with 49 ms/6.3 ms/258/3 (TR/
TE/¯ip angle/excitations) with a spectral fat suppres-
sion pre-impulse. The slice thickness was 1.6 mm with
50% overlap resulting in a calculated thickness of
0.8 mm. A ®eld of view of 120 mm and a scan matrix
of 1286128 voxels was used. The scan time for 51
slices was 5 min 40 s. Scanning was performed in the
axial plane. Panoramic and cross-sectional multiplanar
reconstructions were performed subsequently on a
workstation (Easy Vision, CT/MR Version 2.1,
Philips, Best, The Netherlands) which was equipped
with the dental software package provided by the
manufacturer (Philips, Best, The Netherlands). This
procedure will be called dental MRI in this report. The
study was based on 11 patients aged between 32 and 57
years who complained of dysaesthesia in the ¯oor of
the mouth at the time of their follow up MR
examination, 6 ± 12 months after resection of a
pharyngeal tumour.
All images were read by two radiologists indepen-
dently for the ability to dierentiate the mandibular
neurovascular bundle and scored on a 2-point scale:
Grade 0: not dierentiable and grade 1: accurately
Correspondence to: C Nas
Ï
el, MD, Department of Radiology, University of
Vienna, Wa
È
hringergu
È
rtel 18 ± 20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Received 23 February 1998; accepted 19 June 1998
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (1998) 27, 305 ± 307
1998 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0250 ± 832X/98 $12.00
http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/dmfr
dierentiable. If there was any doubt it was scored
grade 0.
Results and Discussion
The contents of the mandibular canal were clearly
depicted in all subjects. The neurovascular bundle
showed a moderately hyperintense signal which gives
an excellen t contrast to the low signal from
surrounding bone (Figure 1). Therefore, the neuro-
vascular structures can also be recognized easily on
the panoramic reconstructions (Figure 2). Landmarks
such as the mental foramen and the relationship of
the neurovascular bundle to the inferior cortex were
reliably demon strated on the cross-sectional recon-
structions in all cases (Figure 3a and b). In those
cases where the cortex of the mandibular canal was
present it could also be readily dierentiated.
Susceptibility artefacts from the bone/tissue interface
did not cause signi®cant interference. Spatial distor-
tion could be kept to a minimum with the scan
parameters and the voxel size used. Furtherm ore,
using this technique the scan time can be kept shorter
than 6 min. Additionally, movement of the jaw can
be avoided by using a bite block during the
examination.
Neural and vascular structures within the mandibu-
lar canal could not be identi®ed separat ely. Occasion-
ally, branches of the inferior dental plexus arising from
the neurovascular bundle were identi®ed. This is not a
disadvantage, as far as treatment is concerned,
although the ability to assess the vascularization of
the mandible after trauma would be of clinical interest.
Since the proposed sequence is compatible with
intravenous MR contrast agents, contrast-enhanced
dental MRI could be helpful.
Metallic restorations in the teeth did not interfere,
since imaging was performed in the axial plane and the
anatomical structures of interest lie below the occlusal
plane. Possible interference from fatty bone marrow
Figure 1 Axial MR-scan of the mandible about 3 mm above the
inferior cortex using a high resolution gradient echo sequence with
49 ms/6.3 ms/258/3 (TR/TE/¯ip angle/excitations) and a spectral fat
suppression pre-impulse. The neurovascular bundle is clearly shown
as a hyperintense structure (black arrows). The complete set of axial
scans constitutes the raw data for the panoramic and cross-sectional
reconstructions
Figure 2 Panoramic reconstruction showing the course of the
neurovascular bundle on both sides of the mandible as a band of
bright signal (black arrows). Additionally, the relationship of the
neurovascular bundle to the root of the lower right ®rst premolar
(open arrow) can be seen. The dental pulp shows a bright signal,
while the surrounding dentin presents as a signal void
a
b
Figure 3 (a) Cross-sectional reconstruction showing the contents of
the mandibular canal (arrow) are seen in relation to the buccal and
lingual cortices. (b) Cross-sectional reconstruction showing the exit of
neurovascular bundle at the mental foramen (small black arrow)
Mandibular nerve
CNasÏel et al
306
was suppressed by the spectral fat suppression pre-
impulse, which increased the contrast between the bone
and neurovascular structures.
In conclusion, due to the reliable demonstration of
the whole neurovascular bundle on both sides of the
mandible, independence of adjacent bony structures,
short examination time and sucient spatial resolution
for planning oral surgery, dental MRI could become a
viable alternative to plain ®lms or similar 3D-MPR CT
programs.
References
1. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular
canal: comparison of macroscopic ®ndings conventional radio-
graphy, a nd computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac
Implants 1989; 4: 327 ± 332.
2. Miller CS, Nummikoski PV, Barnett DA, Langlais RP. Cross-
sectional tomography. A diagnosti c technique for determining
the buccolingual relationship of impacted mandibular third
molars and t he inferior alveolar n eurovascular bundle. Oral Surg
Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990; 70: 791 ± 797.
3. Torres JH, Nomdedeu H, Leboucq N. Localiz ation of the
mandibular canal: experimental comparison of four types of
radiological examinations. Actual Odontostomatol 1991; 45:
191 ± 198.
4. Ikeda K, Ho KC, Nowicki BH, Haughton VM. Multiplanar MR
and anatomic study of the mandibular canal. AJNR Am J
Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 579 ± 584.
5. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Pre-surgical dental i mplant
assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Implantol
1996; 22: 147 ± 153.
Mandibular nerve
CNasÏel et al
307