Content uploaded by Kathy B. Sheehan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Kathy B. Sheehan on Mar 27, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
ECOLOGY
Thermotolerance Generated by
Plant/Fungal Symbiosis
Regina S. Redman,
1,2
Kathy B. Sheehan,
3,5
Richard G. Stout,
4,5
Russell J. Rodriguez,
1,2
* Joan M. Henson
3,5
All plants studied in natural ecosystems are
symbiotic with fungi (1), which obtain nu-
trients while either positively, negatively,
or neutrally affecting host fitness (2). Plant
adaptation to selective pressures is consid-
ered to be regulated by the plant genome
(3). To test whether mutualistic fungi con-
tribute to plant adaptation, we collected
200 Dichanthelium lanuginosum plants
from geothermal soils at 10 sites in Lassen
Volcanic (LVNP) and Yellowstone (YNP)
National Parks. These soils have annual
temperature fluctuations ranging from
about 20° to 50°C (4 ).
Plants and their roots were removed and as-
sessed for fungal colonization (5). A fungal
endophyte was isolat-
ed from the roots,
crowns, leaves, and
seed coats of all plants
collected. Cultures es-
tablished from single
spores were analyzed
by morphological (6)
and rDNA sequence
analyses (7) that sug-
gested that the endo-
phyte may be a new
species of Curvularia
(5). Soils from the
base of 30 plants in
YNP were devoid of
the Curvularia sp., al-
though other fungi
were abundant (4).
Moreover, axenically
cultured Curvularia
sp. was incapable of
mycelial growth, spore
germination, or surviv-
al at ⱖ40°C (5). Be-
cause geothermal soils
were above 40°C all
summer (4) and de-
void of the fungus, we conclude that this Curvu-
laria sp., like all known Curvularia species, is
exclusively associated with plants.
To assess the effect of the endophyte on
the thermotolerance of D. lanuginosum,we
removed seed coats and surface sterilized
seeds (8) to generate endophyte-free plants.
Treated seeds were planted in sterile ma-
genta boxes containing sand, and after 1
month, plants were either mock-inoculated
or inoculated with Curvularia sp. by pipet-
ting 10
5
spores between the crown and first
leaf. In the absence of thermal stress, en-
dophyte-colonized (symbiotic) and endo-
phyte-free (nonsymbiotic) plants showed
no measurable growth or developmental
differences. When root zones were heated
with thermal tape (Fig. S1), nonsymbiotic
plants (45/45) became shriveled and chlo-
rotic at 50°C (Fig. 1A). In contrast, symbi-
otic plants (45/45) tolerated constant 50°C
soil temperature for 3 days and intermittent
soil temperatures as high as 65°C for 10
days. All nonsymbiotic plants (45/45) died
during the 65°C heat regime, whereas sym-
biotic plants (45/45) survived. The endo-
phyte was reisolated from surface sterilized
roots and leaves of all surviving plants,
indicating that both the fungus and the host
were protected from thermal stress.
We also field-tested symbiotic and non-
symbiotic seedlings in pasteurized geother-
mal soil collected and returned to Amphi-
theater Springs (YNP) in May 2001 (Fig.
1B). By May 2002, symbiotic plants were
greener with greater root and leaf masses (Ta-
ble S2) than those of nonsymbiotic plants in
soils ⱕ40°C. In soils above 40°C, nonsymbi-
otic plants did not survive while symbiotic
plants thrived. The beneficial effect of fungal
symbiosis increased with soil temperatures,
demonstrating that Curvularia sp. provided
thermal protection for D. lanuginosum. We rei-
solated Curvularia sp. from D. lanuginosum
roots at 45°C field soil temperatures, indicat-
ing that thermal protection was also provided
to the fungus, which corroborated our labo-
ratory experiments.
In addition to thermotolerance, the basis of
mutualism in this system may involve other
benefits (e.g., nutrient acquisition by the fun-
gus). Several possible symbiotic mechanisms
could confer thermotolerance. In planta, the
fungal endophyte produces cell wall melanin
(Fig. S3) that may dissipate heat along the
hyphae and/or complex with oxygen radicals
generated during heat stress (9). Alternatively,
the endophyte may act as a “biological trigger”
allowing symbiotic plants to activate stress-
response systems more rapidly and strongly
than nonsymbiotic plants (10).
References and Notes
1. O. Petrini, in Microbiology of the Phyllosphere,N.J.
Fokkema, J. van den Heuvel, Eds. (Cambridge Univ.
Press, Cambridge, 1986), pp. 175–187.
2. D. H. Lewis, in The Biology of Mutualism,D.H.
Boucher, Ed. (Croom Helm, London, 1985), pp. 29 –
39.
3. M. F. Smallwood, C. M. Calvert, D. J. Bowles, Eds.,
Plant Responses to Environmental Stress (BIOS Scien-
tific Publishers, Oxford, 1999).
4. R. S. Redman, A. Litvintseva, K. B. Sheehan, J. M.
Henson, R. J. Rodriguez, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65,
5193 (1999).
5. Materials and Methods are available as supporting
material on Science Online.
6. A. Sivanesan, Mycol. Pap. 158, 104 (1987).
7. T. J. White, T. Bruns, S. Lee, J. Taylor, in PCR
Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications,
M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, T. J. White,
Eds. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1990), pp.
315–322.
8. R. S. Redman, D. D. Dunigan, R. J. Rodriguez, New
Phytol. 151, 705 (2001).
9. J. F. Davidson, B. Whyte, P. H. Bissinger, R. H. Schiestl,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 5116 (1996).
10. R. S. Redman et al., Plant Physiol. 119, 795 (1999).
11. We thank T. Al-Niemi, L. Brasche, M. Bateson, E.
Kuhn, A. Litvintseva, and J. Duda for technical and
field assistance. This project was made possible by
the permission, assistance, and guidelines of YNP and
LVNP. This work was supported by grants from the
U.S. Geological Survey, the NSF (9977922), the U.S.
Army Research Office (DAAHO4-96-1-01194), and
the MSU Thermal Biology Institute.
Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/298/5598/1581/
DC1
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 and S3
Table S2
1
U.S. Geological Survey, WFRC, 6505 NE 65th Street,
Seattle, WA 98115, USA.
2
Department of Botany,
University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
3
Department of Microbiology,
4
Department of Plant
Sciences, and
5
Thermal Biology Institute, Montana
State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-
mail: Rusty_Rodriguez@usgs.gov
Fig. 1. Representative symbiotic (with Curvularia sp.) and nonsymbiotic
D. lanuginosum plants with rhizosphere temperatures of 50°C for 3 days
or 65°C for 8 hours/day for 10 days under laboratory conditions (A) and
in 40° or 45°C soil under field conditions (B).
B REVIA
www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 298 22 NOVEMBER 2002 1581